Development and validation of a Modified Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment as a nutritional assessment tool in cancer patients
Background Completing Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG‐SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an easy‐to‐use modified PG‐SGA (mPG‐SGA) for cancer patients. Methods Seventy professionals assessed the content validity, comprehensibility, and d...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 343 - 354 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.02.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Completing Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG‐SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an easy‐to‐use modified PG‐SGA (mPG‐SGA) for cancer patients.
Methods
Seventy professionals assessed the content validity, comprehensibility, and difficulty of the full PG‐SGA. A survey including the PG‐SGA and other questionnaires was completed by 34 071 adult hospitalized cancer patients with first cancer diagnosis or recurrent disease with any tumour comorbidities from the INSCOC study. Among them, 1558 patients were followed for 5 years after admission. Reliability and rank correlation were estimated to assess the consistency between PG‐SGA items and to select mPG‐SGA items. The external and internal validity, test–retest reliability, and predictive validity were tested for the mPG‐SGA via comparison with both the PG‐SGA and abridged PG‐SGA (abPG‐SGA).
Results
After deleting items that more than 50% of professionals considered difficult to evaluate (Worksheet 4) and items with an item‐total correlation <0.1, the mPG‐SGA was constructed. Nutritional status was categorized using mPG‐SGA scores as well‐nourished (0 points) or mildly (1–2 points), moderately (3–6 points), or severely malnourished (≥7 points) based on the area under curve (0.962, 0.989, and 0.985) and maximal sensitivity (0.924, 0.918, and 0.945) and specificity (1.000, 1.000, and 0.938) of the cut‐off scores. The external and internal validity and test–retest reliability were good. Significant median overall survival differences were found among nutritional status groups categorized by the mPG‐SGA: 24, 18, 14, and 10 months for well‐nourished, mildly malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished, respectively (all Ps < 0.05). Neither the PG‐SGA nor the abridged PG‐SGA could discriminate the median overall survival differences between the well‐nourished and mildly malnourished groups.
Conclusions
We systematically developed and validated the mPG‐SGA as an easier‐to‐use nutritional assessment tool for cancer patients. The mPG‐SGA appears to have better predictive validity for survival than the PG‐SGA and abridged PG‐SGA. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background
Completing Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG‐SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an easy‐to‐use modified PG‐SGA (mPG‐SGA) for cancer patients.
Methods
Seventy professionals assessed the content validity, comprehensibility, and difficulty of the full PG‐SGA. A survey including the PG‐SGA and other questionnaires was completed by 34 071 adult hospitalized cancer patients with first cancer diagnosis or recurrent disease with any tumour comorbidities from the INSCOC study. Among them, 1558 patients were followed for 5 years after admission. Reliability and rank correlation were estimated to assess the consistency between PG‐SGA items and to select mPG‐SGA items. The external and internal validity, test–retest reliability, and predictive validity were tested for the mPG‐SGA via comparison with both the PG‐SGA and abridged PG‐SGA (abPG‐SGA).
Results
After deleting items that more than 50% of professionals considered difficult to evaluate (Worksheet 4) and items with an item‐total correlation <0.1, the mPG‐SGA was constructed. Nutritional status was categorized using mPG‐SGA scores as well‐nourished (0 points) or mildly (1–2 points), moderately (3–6 points), or severely malnourished (≥7 points) based on the area under curve (0.962, 0.989, and 0.985) and maximal sensitivity (0.924, 0.918, and 0.945) and specificity (1.000, 1.000, and 0.938) of the cut‐off scores. The external and internal validity and test–retest reliability were good. Significant median overall survival differences were found among nutritional status groups categorized by the mPG‐SGA: 24, 18, 14, and 10 months for well‐nourished, mildly malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished, respectively (all Ps < 0.05). Neither the PG‐SGA nor the abridged PG‐SGA could discriminate the median overall survival differences between the well‐nourished and mildly malnourished groups.
Conclusions
We systematically developed and validated the mPG‐SGA as an easier‐to‐use nutritional assessment tool for cancer patients. The mPG‐SGA appears to have better predictive validity for survival than the PG‐SGA and abridged PG‐SGA. Completing Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an easy-to-use modified PG-SGA (mPG-SGA) for cancer patients. Seventy professionals assessed the content validity, comprehensibility, and difficulty of the full PG-SGA. A survey including the PG-SGA and other questionnaires was completed by 34 071 adult hospitalized cancer patients with first cancer diagnosis or recurrent disease with any tumour comorbidities from the INSCOC study. Among them, 1558 patients were followed for 5 years after admission. Reliability and rank correlation were estimated to assess the consistency between PG-SGA items and to select mPG-SGA items. The external and internal validity, test-retest reliability, and predictive validity were tested for the mPG-SGA via comparison with both the PG-SGA and abridged PG-SGA (abPG-SGA). After deleting items that more than 50% of professionals considered difficult to evaluate (Worksheet 4) and items with an item-total correlation <0.1, the mPG-SGA was constructed. Nutritional status was categorized using mPG-SGA scores as well-nourished (0 points) or mildly (1-2 points), moderately (3-6 points), or severely malnourished (≥7 points) based on the area under curve (0.962, 0.989, and 0.985) and maximal sensitivity (0.924, 0.918, and 0.945) and specificity (1.000, 1.000, and 0.938) of the cut-off scores. The external and internal validity and test-retest reliability were good. Significant median overall survival differences were found among nutritional status groups categorized by the mPG-SGA: 24, 18, 14, and 10 months for well-nourished, mildly malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished, respectively (all Ps < 0.05). Neither the PG-SGA nor the abridged PG-SGA could discriminate the median overall survival differences between the well-nourished and mildly malnourished groups. We systematically developed and validated the mPG-SGA as an easier-to-use nutritional assessment tool for cancer patients. The mPG-SGA appears to have better predictive validity for survival than the PG-SGA and abridged PG-SGA. Abstract Background Completing Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG‐SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an easy‐to‐use modified PG‐SGA (mPG‐SGA) for cancer patients. Methods Seventy professionals assessed the content validity, comprehensibility, and difficulty of the full PG‐SGA. A survey including the PG‐SGA and other questionnaires was completed by 34 071 adult hospitalized cancer patients with first cancer diagnosis or recurrent disease with any tumour comorbidities from the INSCOC study. Among them, 1558 patients were followed for 5 years after admission. Reliability and rank correlation were estimated to assess the consistency between PG‐SGA items and to select mPG‐SGA items. The external and internal validity, test–retest reliability, and predictive validity were tested for the mPG‐SGA via comparison with both the PG‐SGA and abridged PG‐SGA (abPG‐SGA). Results After deleting items that more than 50% of professionals considered difficult to evaluate (Worksheet 4) and items with an item‐total correlation <0.1, the mPG‐SGA was constructed. Nutritional status was categorized using mPG‐SGA scores as well‐nourished (0 points) or mildly (1–2 points), moderately (3–6 points), or severely malnourished (≥7 points) based on the area under curve (0.962, 0.989, and 0.985) and maximal sensitivity (0.924, 0.918, and 0.945) and specificity (1.000, 1.000, and 0.938) of the cut‐off scores. The external and internal validity and test–retest reliability were good. Significant median overall survival differences were found among nutritional status groups categorized by the mPG‐SGA: 24, 18, 14, and 10 months for well‐nourished, mildly malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished, respectively (all Ps < 0.05). Neither the PG‐SGA nor the abridged PG‐SGA could discriminate the median overall survival differences between the well‐nourished and mildly malnourished groups. Conclusions We systematically developed and validated the mPG‐SGA as an easier‐to‐use nutritional assessment tool for cancer patients. The mPG‐SGA appears to have better predictive validity for survival than the PG‐SGA and abridged PG‐SGA. Completing Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an easy-to-use modified PG-SGA (mPG-SGA) for cancer patients.BACKGROUNDCompleting Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an easy-to-use modified PG-SGA (mPG-SGA) for cancer patients.Seventy professionals assessed the content validity, comprehensibility, and difficulty of the full PG-SGA. A survey including the PG-SGA and other questionnaires was completed by 34 071 adult hospitalized cancer patients with first cancer diagnosis or recurrent disease with any tumour comorbidities from the INSCOC study. Among them, 1558 patients were followed for 5 years after admission. Reliability and rank correlation were estimated to assess the consistency between PG-SGA items and to select mPG-SGA items. The external and internal validity, test-retest reliability, and predictive validity were tested for the mPG-SGA via comparison with both the PG-SGA and abridged PG-SGA (abPG-SGA).METHODSSeventy professionals assessed the content validity, comprehensibility, and difficulty of the full PG-SGA. A survey including the PG-SGA and other questionnaires was completed by 34 071 adult hospitalized cancer patients with first cancer diagnosis or recurrent disease with any tumour comorbidities from the INSCOC study. Among them, 1558 patients were followed for 5 years after admission. Reliability and rank correlation were estimated to assess the consistency between PG-SGA items and to select mPG-SGA items. The external and internal validity, test-retest reliability, and predictive validity were tested for the mPG-SGA via comparison with both the PG-SGA and abridged PG-SGA (abPG-SGA).After deleting items that more than 50% of professionals considered difficult to evaluate (Worksheet 4) and items with an item-total correlation <0.1, the mPG-SGA was constructed. Nutritional status was categorized using mPG-SGA scores as well-nourished (0 points) or mildly (1-2 points), moderately (3-6 points), or severely malnourished (≥7 points) based on the area under curve (0.962, 0.989, and 0.985) and maximal sensitivity (0.924, 0.918, and 0.945) and specificity (1.000, 1.000, and 0.938) of the cut-off scores. The external and internal validity and test-retest reliability were good. Significant median overall survival differences were found among nutritional status groups categorized by the mPG-SGA: 24, 18, 14, and 10 months for well-nourished, mildly malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished, respectively (all Ps < 0.05). Neither the PG-SGA nor the abridged PG-SGA could discriminate the median overall survival differences between the well-nourished and mildly malnourished groups.RESULTSAfter deleting items that more than 50% of professionals considered difficult to evaluate (Worksheet 4) and items with an item-total correlation <0.1, the mPG-SGA was constructed. Nutritional status was categorized using mPG-SGA scores as well-nourished (0 points) or mildly (1-2 points), moderately (3-6 points), or severely malnourished (≥7 points) based on the area under curve (0.962, 0.989, and 0.985) and maximal sensitivity (0.924, 0.918, and 0.945) and specificity (1.000, 1.000, and 0.938) of the cut-off scores. The external and internal validity and test-retest reliability were good. Significant median overall survival differences were found among nutritional status groups categorized by the mPG-SGA: 24, 18, 14, and 10 months for well-nourished, mildly malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished, respectively (all Ps < 0.05). Neither the PG-SGA nor the abridged PG-SGA could discriminate the median overall survival differences between the well-nourished and mildly malnourished groups.We systematically developed and validated the mPG-SGA as an easier-to-use nutritional assessment tool for cancer patients. The mPG-SGA appears to have better predictive validity for survival than the PG-SGA and abridged PG-SGA.CONCLUSIONSWe systematically developed and validated the mPG-SGA as an easier-to-use nutritional assessment tool for cancer patients. The mPG-SGA appears to have better predictive validity for survival than the PG-SGA and abridged PG-SGA. BackgroundCompleting Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an easy-to-use modified PG-SGA (mPG-SGA) for cancer patients.MethodsSeventy professionals assessed the content validity, comprehensibility, and difficulty of the full PG-SGA. A survey including the PG-SGA and other questionnaires was completed by 34 071 adult hospitalized cancer patients with first cancer diagnosis or recurrent disease with any tumour comorbidities from the INSCOC study. Among them, 1558 patients were followed for 5 years after admission. Reliability and rank correlation were estimated to assess the consistency between PG-SGA items and to select mPG-SGA items. The external and internal validity, test–retest reliability, and predictive validity were tested for the mPG-SGA via comparison with both the PG-SGA and abridged PG-SGA (abPG-SGA).ResultsAfter deleting items that more than 50% of professionals considered difficult to evaluate (Worksheet 4) and items with an item-total correlation <0.1, the mPG-SGA was constructed. Nutritional status was categorized using mPG-SGA scores as well-nourished (0 points) or mildly (1–2 points), moderately (3–6 points), or severely malnourished (≥7 points) based on the area under curve (0.962, 0.989, and 0.985) and maximal sensitivity (0.924, 0.918, and 0.945) and specificity (1.000, 1.000, and 0.938) of the cut-off scores. The external and internal validity and test–retest reliability were good. Significant median overall survival differences were found among nutritional status groups categorized by the mPG-SGA: 24, 18, 14, and 10 months for well-nourished, mildly malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished, respectively (all Ps < 0.05). Neither the PG-SGA nor the abridged PG-SGA could discriminate the median overall survival differences between the well-nourished and mildly malnourished groups.ConclusionsWe systematically developed and validated the mPG-SGA as an easier-to-use nutritional assessment tool for cancer patients. The mPG-SGA appears to have better predictive validity for survival than the PG-SGA and abridged PG-SGA. |
Author | Zhang, Qi Li, Zeng‐Ning Wang, Chang Li, Wei Shi, Han‐Ping Cong, Ming‐Hua Zhuang, Cheng‐Le Xu, Hong‐Xia Li, Tao Weng, Min Li, Zhao‐Ping Song, Chun‐Hua Zhang, Rui Wang, Kun‐Hua Fu, Zhenming Guo, Zeng‐Qing |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 Department of Comprehensive Oncology National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China 6 Department of Nutrition The First Hospital, Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang China 10 Department of Epidemiology College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China 12 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China 14 Beijing International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition Beijing China 4 Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine UESTC Chengdu China 8 Cancer Center The First Hospital, Jilin University Changchun China 9 Department of Clinical Nutrition Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) Chongqing China 1 Cancer Center Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan China 11 |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Cancer Center Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan China – name: 6 Department of Nutrition The First Hospital, Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang China – name: 13 Department of Oncology Capital Medical University Beijing China – name: 9 Department of Clinical Nutrition Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) Chongqing China – name: 2 Department of Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University Kunming China – name: 11 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai China – name: 5 Department of Medical Oncology Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital Fuzhou China – name: 12 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China – name: 8 Cancer Center The First Hospital, Jilin University Changchun China – name: 4 Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine UESTC Chengdu China – name: 3 Department of Comprehensive Oncology National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China – name: 7 Center for Human Nutrition David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles CA USA – name: 14 Beijing International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition Beijing China – name: 10 Department of Epidemiology College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Zhenming orcidid: 0000-0003-2416-9591 surname: Fu fullname: Fu, Zhenming organization: Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University – sequence: 2 givenname: Rui surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Rui organization: Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University – sequence: 3 givenname: Kun‐Hua surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Kun‐Hua organization: The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University – sequence: 4 givenname: Ming‐Hua surname: Cong fullname: Cong, Ming‐Hua organization: National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College – sequence: 5 givenname: Tao surname: Li fullname: Li, Tao organization: UESTC – sequence: 6 givenname: Min surname: Weng fullname: Weng, Min organization: The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University – sequence: 7 givenname: Zeng‐Qing surname: Guo fullname: Guo, Zeng‐Qing organization: Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital – sequence: 8 givenname: Zeng‐Ning surname: Li fullname: Li, Zeng‐Ning organization: The First Hospital, Hebei Medical University – sequence: 9 givenname: Zhao‐Ping surname: Li fullname: Li, Zhao‐Ping organization: David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA – sequence: 10 givenname: Chang surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Chang organization: The First Hospital, Jilin University – sequence: 11 givenname: Hong‐Xia surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Hong‐Xia organization: Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) – sequence: 12 givenname: Chun‐Hua surname: Song fullname: Song, Chun‐Hua organization: College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University – sequence: 13 givenname: Cheng‐Le surname: Zhuang fullname: Zhuang, Cheng‐Le organization: Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University – sequence: 14 givenname: Qi surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Qi organization: Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University – sequence: 15 givenname: Wei surname: Li fullname: Li, Wei email: drweili@yahoo.com organization: The First Hospital, Jilin University – sequence: 16 givenname: Han‐Ping surname: Shi fullname: Shi, Han‐Ping email: shihp@ccmu.edu.cn organization: Beijing International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34862759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kt1qFDEUgAep2Fp74wPIgDcibE0ymUxyI5RV10qLQvU6JJmTmiWbrMnMSu98AcFn9EnMdtZqi5ibhHO-8-XvPKz2QgxQVY8xOsYIkRdLk1fHmPCO3KsOCBZoxhASe7t1KwTer45yXqIyKMOsRQ-q_YZyRrpWHFTfX8EGfFyvIAy1Cn29Ud71anAx1NHWqj6PvbMO-vpDCRbo57cfCwiQ1FBiF6NeghncBuqFj1r5-iRnyHmy5VIexiG5ra3k1J_cEKOvXaiNCgZSvZ7c-VF13yqf4Wg3H1af3rz-OH87O3u_OJ2fnM1MiymZWaYoNkbTxlJrrOCGWW11p1uDG0Q5Eq1l3FDVg6Gttkwz1lHcaaGJ6Dk0h9Xp5O2jWsp1ciuVrmRUTl4HYrqUKg3OeJC0oS1RvMEGcdqRjltNMAEsKO1BI1JcLyfXetQr6E25R1L-lvR2JrjP8jJuJOeYtwIVwbOdIMUvI-RBrlw24L0KEMcsCUNMENp0272e3kGXcUzlbbcUaQXh5V8L9eTvE90c5fevF-D5BJgUc05gbxCM5Lar5Lar5HVXFRjdgY0brhuk3Mb5f5fgqeSr83D1H7l8N784n2p-AWmd4pY |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_jhn_70012 crossref_primary_10_34175_jno202201004 crossref_primary_10_1123_jpah_2023_0622 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11427_022_2292_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clnu_2023_04_021 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_023_2808_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clnu_2024_03_008 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2024_1402328 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00520_024_09085_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00520_025_09267_2 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcsm_13368 crossref_primary_10_1002_ncp_11140 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soncn_2024_151794 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X 10.1177/1758835919880084 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.05.001 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.08.026 10.1007/s12032-010-9534-z 10.2147/PPA.S204188 10.1007/s00520-016-3196-0 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.10.001 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.1916 10.1007/s00520-019-4637-3 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.011 10.1016/0899-9007(95)00067-4 10.1016/j.jand.2013.09.027 10.1007/s00520-014-2304-2 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.4.1249 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.06.001 10.1177/0884533617725071 10.1093/ajcn/nqy244 10.1080/01635581.2013.755554 10.1002/jcsm.12501 10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000505 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110643 10.1002/ncp.10313 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders. 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders. – notice: 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
CorporateAuthor | The INSCOC Study Group INSCOC Study Group |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: The INSCOC Study Group – name: INSCOC Study Group |
DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1002/jcsm.12872 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: 7X7 name: Health & Medical Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Development and validation of a modified PG‐SGA |
EISSN | 2190-6009 |
EndPage | 354 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_43452a831c0847278fb212e1944deb02 PMC8818590 34862759 10_1002_jcsm_12872 JCSM12872 |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: The National Science Foundation of China funderid: 81773555 – fundername: The National Key Research and Development Program: The key technology of palliative care and nursing for cancer patients funderid: 2017YFC1309200 – fundername: ; grantid: 81773555 – fundername: The National Key Research and Development Program: The key technology of palliative care and nursing for cancer patients grantid: 2017YFC1309200 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 1OC 24P 2VQ 4.4 40G 53G 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAHHS AAKDD AAZKR ABUWG ACCFJ ACCMX ACXQS ADBBV ADINQ ADKYN ADPDF ADRAZ ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AENEX AEQDE AFKRA AHBYD AHSBF AIWBW AJBDE ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMKLP AOIJS AVUZU AZFZN BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU DIK EBS EJD EMOBN FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH ITC KQ8 M48 M~E O9- OK1 OVD OVEED PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RPM RSV SMD SOJ U2A UKHRP WIN ZOVNA AAFWJ AAYXX AFPKN CITATION PHGZM PHGZT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5142-f6a41ccb43f4fcf98c6fbfb7b5c13048095f68c4adec45bf6b667417b9b29d8e3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2190-5991 2190-6009 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 00:59:02 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:17:49 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:12:52 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 03:51:49 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:09:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:51:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:13:17 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:27:17 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Nutritional assessment tool Cancer patient Patient-generated subjective global assessment mPG-SGA PG-SGA |
Language | English |
License | Attribution 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5142-f6a41ccb43f4fcf98c6fbfb7b5c13048095f68c4adec45bf6b667417b9b29d8e3 |
Notes | Wei Li and Han‐Ping Shi contributed equally as senior authors. Zhenming Fu and Rui Zhang contributed equally as first authors. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-2416-9591 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/43452a831c0847278fb212e1944deb02 |
PMID | 34862759 |
PQID | 2625928862 |
PQPubID | 4370305 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43452a831c0847278fb212e1944deb02 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8818590 proquest_miscellaneous_2606924372 proquest_journals_2625928862 pubmed_primary_34862759 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcsm_12872 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jcsm_12872 wiley_primary_10_1002_jcsm_12872_JCSM12872 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | February 2022 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2022 text: February 2022 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Germany |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Germany – name: Heidelberg – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc – name: Wiley |
References | 2019; 71 2017; 1 2013; 65 2018; 108 2019; 11 2019; 10 2019; 13 2019; 35 2011; 30 2018; 41 2016; 15 2014; 114 2014; 22 1996; 12 2005; 24 2018; 6 2018; 3 2016; 1 2020; 2 2019; 20 2010; 28 2020; 72 2017; 32 2017; 13 2018; 92 2019; 27 2019; 119 2014 2011; 28 2018; 37 2016; 24 e_1_2_9_31_1 e_1_2_9_11_1 e_1_2_9_10_1 e_1_2_9_13_1 e_1_2_9_32_1 e_1_2_9_12_1 Zhenming F (e_1_2_9_19_1) 2016; 1 Bahl A (e_1_2_9_30_1) 2017; 1 e_1_2_9_15_1 e_1_2_9_17_1 e_1_2_9_16_1 Shahvazi S (e_1_2_9_21_1) 2017; 13 Zhenming F (e_1_2_9_20_1) 2018; 3 e_1_2_9_22_1 e_1_2_9_24_1 e_1_2_9_23_1 e_1_2_9_8_1 e_1_2_9_7_1 e_1_2_9_6_1 e_1_2_9_5_1 e_1_2_9_4_1 e_1_2_9_3_1 e_1_2_9_2_1 e_1_2_9_9_1 Xu H (e_1_2_9_14_1) 2020; 2 e_1_2_9_26_1 e_1_2_9_25_1 e_1_2_9_28_1 e_1_2_9_27_1 Hanping S (e_1_2_9_18_1) 2014 e_1_2_9_29_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 13 start-page: 514 year: 2017 end-page: 518 article-title: Assessment of nutritional status using abridged scored patient‐generated subjective global assessment in cancer patient publication-title: J Cancer Res Ther – volume: 1 start-page: 61 year: 2017 end-page: 63 article-title: Pre‐treatment nutritional status and radiotherapy outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers publication-title: Gulf J Oncolog – volume: 32 start-page: 675 year: 2017 end-page: 681 article-title: Performance of patient‐generated subjective global assessment (PG‐SGA) in patients with advanced cancer in palliative care publication-title: Nutr Clin Pract – volume: 3 start-page: 182 issue: 4 year: 2018 end-page: 188 article-title: Validity of the Chinese version of the patient‐generated subjective global assessment (PG‐SGA) in gastric cancer patients publication-title: J Nutr Oncol – volume: 119 start-page: 35 year: 2019 end-page: 43 article-title: Evaluation of two nutritional scores' association with systemic treatment toxicity and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: an AGEO prospective multicentre study publication-title: Eur J Cancer – volume: 65 start-page: 234 year: 2013 end-page: 239 article-title: Use of an abridged scored patient‐generated subjective global assessment (abPG‐SGA) as a nutritional screening tool for cancer patients in an outpatient setting publication-title: Nutr Cancer – volume: 28 start-page: 689 year: 2011 end-page: 696 article-title: Comparison of PG‐SGA, SGA and body‐composition measurement in detecting malnutrition among newly diagnosed lung cancer patients in stage IIIB/IV and benign conditions publication-title: Med Oncol – volume: 13 start-page: 1391 year: 2019 end-page: 1400 article-title: Patient interpretation of the patient‐generated subjective global assessment (PG‐SGA) short form publication-title: Patient Prefer Adherence – volume: 27 start-page: 3499 year: 2019 end-page: 3507 article-title: Tri‐country translation, cultural adaptation, and validity confirmation of the scored patient‐generated subjective global assessment publication-title: Support Care Cancer – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2020 end-page: 9 article-title: Investigation on nutrition status and clinical outcome of patients with common cancers in Chinese patients: a multicenter prospective study protocol publication-title: Int J Clin Trials – volume: 37 start-page: 1505 year: 2018 end-page: 1511 article-title: Different nutritional assessment tools as predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection publication-title: Clin Nutr – volume: 41 start-page: 450 year: 2018 end-page: 462 article-title: Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored patient‐generated subjective global assessment: an interdisciplinary nutritional instrument appropriate for Dutch cancer patients publication-title: Cancer Nurs – year: 2014 – volume: 20 start-page: 1249 year: 2019 end-page: 1255 article-title: Validation of the scored patient‐generated subjective global assessment (PG‐SGA) in Thai setting and association with nutritional parameters in cancer patients publication-title: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev – volume: 10 start-page: 1143 year: 2019 end-page: 1145 article-title: Ethical guidelines for publishing in the : update 2019 publication-title: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle – volume: 6 start-page: e555 year: 2018 end-page: e567 article-title: Changing cancer survival in China during 2003–15: a pooled analysis of 17 population‐based cancer registries publication-title: Lancet Glob Health – volume: 11 year: 2019 article-title: From guidelines to clinical practice: a roadmap for oncologists for nutrition therapy for cancer patients publication-title: Ther Adv Med Oncol – volume: 22 start-page: 2997 year: 2014 end-page: 3005 article-title: Intensive nutritional counseling improves PG‐SGA scores and nutritional symptoms during and after radiotherapy in Korean cancer patients publication-title: Support Care Cancer – volume: 71 start-page: 898 year: 2019 end-page: 907 article-title: Nutritional screening tools used and validated for cancer patients: a systematic review publication-title: Nutr Cancer – volume: 72 year: 2020 article-title: Sensitive and practical screening instrument for malnutrition in patients with chronic kidney disease publication-title: Nutrition – volume: 92 start-page: 34 year: 2018 end-page: 42 article-title: Assessing the feasibility of a mobile health‐supported clinical decision support system for nutritional triage in oncology outpatients using Arden syntax publication-title: Artif Intell Med – volume: 1 start-page: 52 issue: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 59 article-title: Validity of the Chinese version of the patient‐generated subjective global assessment (PG‐SGA) in lung cancer patients publication-title: J Nutr Oncol – volume: 35 start-page: 353 year: 2019 end-page: 362 article-title: Self‐completion of the patient‐generated subjective global assessment short form is feasible and is associated with increased awareness on malnutrition risk in patients with head and neck cancer publication-title: Nutr Clin Pract – volume: 24 start-page: 3883 year: 2016 end-page: 3887 article-title: Patient‐generated subjective global assessment short form (PG‐SGA SF) is a valid screening tool in chemotherapy outpatients publication-title: Support Care Cancer – volume: 108 start-page: 1196 year: 2018 end-page: 1208 article-title: Validated screening tools for the assessment of cachexia, sarcopenia, and malnutrition: a systematic review publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr – volume: 28 start-page: 4376 year: 2010 end-page: 4383 article-title: Prognostic factors in patients with advanced cancer: use of the patient‐generated subjective global assessment in survival prediction publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 30 start-page: 724 year: 2011 end-page: 729 article-title: Development and validation of a nutrition screening tool for hospitalized cancer patients publication-title: Clin Nutr – volume: 15 start-page: 155 year: 2016 end-page: 163 article-title: A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research publication-title: J Chiropr Med – volume: 12 start-page: S15 year: 1996 end-page: S19 article-title: Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology publication-title: Nutrition – volume: 114 start-page: 1088 year: 2014 end-page: 1098 article-title: The abridged patient‐generated subjective global assessment is a useful tool for early detection and characterization of cancer cachexia publication-title: J Acad Nutr Diet – volume: 24 start-page: 801 year: 2005 end-page: 814 article-title: An epidemiological evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition in Spanish patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer publication-title: Clin Nutr – volume: 1 start-page: 52 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_9_19_1 article-title: Validity of the Chinese version of the patient‐generated subjective global assessment (PG‐SGA) in lung cancer patients publication-title: J Nutr Oncol – ident: e_1_2_9_27_1 doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X – ident: e_1_2_9_17_1 doi: 10.1177/1758835919880084 – ident: e_1_2_9_16_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 – volume: 3 start-page: 182 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_9_20_1 article-title: Validity of the Chinese version of the patient‐generated subjective global assessment (PG‐SGA) in gastric cancer patients publication-title: J Nutr Oncol – ident: e_1_2_9_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.05.001 – volume: 13 start-page: 514 year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_9_21_1 article-title: Assessment of nutritional status using abridged scored patient‐generated subjective global assessment in cancer patient publication-title: J Cancer Res Ther – ident: e_1_2_9_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.08.026 – volume-title: Nutrition screening and assessment year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_9_18_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_29_1 doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9534-z – ident: e_1_2_9_12_1 doi: 10.2147/PPA.S204188 – ident: e_1_2_9_13_1 doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3196-0 – ident: e_1_2_9_31_1 doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.10.001 – ident: e_1_2_9_6_1 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.1916 – volume: 1 start-page: 61 year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_9_30_1 article-title: Pre‐treatment nutritional status and radiotherapy outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers publication-title: Gulf J Oncolog – ident: e_1_2_9_10_1 doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-4637-3 – ident: e_1_2_9_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.011 – ident: e_1_2_9_15_1 doi: 10.1016/0899-9007(95)00067-4 – ident: e_1_2_9_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.09.027 – ident: e_1_2_9_24_1 doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2304-2 – ident: e_1_2_9_4_1 doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.4.1249 – ident: e_1_2_9_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.06.001 – ident: e_1_2_9_5_1 doi: 10.1177/0884533617725071 – ident: e_1_2_9_7_1 doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy244 – ident: e_1_2_9_11_1 doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.755554 – ident: e_1_2_9_32_1 doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12501 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_1 doi: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045 – ident: e_1_2_9_23_1 doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000505 – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2020 ident: e_1_2_9_14_1 article-title: Investigation on nutrition status and clinical outcome of patients with common cancers in Chinese patients: a multicenter prospective study protocol publication-title: Int J Clin Trials – ident: e_1_2_9_25_1 doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110643 – ident: e_1_2_9_22_1 doi: 10.1002/ncp.10313 |
SSID | ssj0000461650 |
Score | 2.3530095 |
Snippet | Background
Completing Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG‐SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an... Completing Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an easy-to-use... BackgroundCompleting Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an... Abstract Background Completing Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG‐SGA) questionnaires is time consuming. This study aimed to develop and... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 343 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Boxes Cancer Cancer patient Hemoglobin Humans Malnutrition Malnutrition - diagnosis Malnutrition - etiology mPG‐SGA Neoplasms - complications Neoplasms - diagnosis Nutrition Nutrition Assessment Nutritional assessment tool Nutritional Status Original Original : Clinical Patients Patient‐generated subjective global assessment PG‐SGA Professionals Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Validity |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Nb9QwELWgSIgL4ptAQUZwASk0cRzbOaFSUVWVFiFBpb1F9sSGrUpSdre_gj_NjONNu6LqLYonkZ0Zz7zY4zeMvQMREHVTcqtHNchQ1rnxQedl2TgnC-8cxATZr-roRB7P63lacFultMqNT4yOuhuA1sj3BAF1YRCAfzr_k1PVKNpdTSU0brM7RF1GKV16rqc1FiITV7FIq6AT0zVioYmhVOydwur3R3TPWmzFpEjdfx3e_D9t8iqcjfHo8AG7n4Ak3x81_5Dd8v0jdneWtsofs79X0oG47TuOJrUYCyjxIXDLZ0O3CAhA-beRWjUfGagRgXL0JqejI-RjTQC-PxF4crvCh_sNiT-22cu29TCc8UXPgWxpyRNp6-oJOzn88uPgKE-VF3JAACXyoKwsAZysggwQGgMquOC0qwFjnjSIy4IyIG3nQdYuKKcUQhPtGieazvjqKdvph94_Z1wWEiSUxpYVSGeE1crXynn8DQWtg8nY-823byHRklN1jLN2JFQWLempjXrK2NtJ9nwk47hW6jOpcJIgAu14Y1j-bNN8bGUla2FNVUKB8VloExwGcV82UnbeFfiS3Y0BtGlWr9pLG8zYm6kZ5yNtstjeDxckU6iGWB5R5tloL1NPKmmIFLrJmN6ypK2ubrf0i1-R89sQsGqKjH2INnfD8Nvjg--zePXi5jG8ZPcEneWIKei7bGe9vPCvEGGt3es4jf4BCi0m3g priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3ditQwFA7LCuKNrP_VVSJ6o9C1TU-T9EJkXVyWhRFBB_auJGmis4ztOjMLeucLCD6jT-JJ0tYZHLzyrjQnJU3Ozxdy8h1CnhrmEHX75FaLywAuL1NpnUjzvNIaMqu1CQmyb_nJFE7PyrMdMtTv7CdwuXVr5-tJTRfzg69fvr1Cg3_ZE4i-ODfLzwfoZwW64isYkYQ30EkP84NHBp7zUKyV-ZvTJWKikal0vftGbAoU_ttw59_pk-uwNsSl4z1yvQeU9DBqwA2yY9ub5OqkPzK_RX6spQVR1TYUVWsWCynRzlFFJ10zcwhE6btIsfrr-8_IRY1YlKJfOY8ukcbqAPRwpPKkaond24HOH9vUn7ZV183prKXGa9WC9vSty9tkevzmw9FJ2tdgSA1CKZY6riA3RkPhwBlXScOddlro0mD0A4kIzXFpQDXWQKkd15wjSBG60qxqpC3ukN22a-09QiEDAyaXKi8MaMmU4Lbk2uKG1AjhZEKeDbNfm56g3NfJmNeRWpnVfqXqsFIJeTLKXkRajq1Sr_0ijhKeSju86BYf694yayigZEoWuckwUjMhncZwbvMKoLE6w4_sDypQD-pZM79tZBK3gwl5PDajZfrjFtXa7tLLZLzyfI8oczdqzDiSAqSnh64SIjZ0aWOomy3t7FNg_5YeYlVZQp4HrfvH79enR-8n4en-_5iIB-Qa83c_Qsr6PtldLS7tQ0RkK_0omNtv4dI3Ag priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal – databaseName: Wiley Online Library Open Access dbid: 24P link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1fa9UwFA9jgvgi83_dlIi-KNS16Wmagi9zOMbgykAHeytJmugds5Xbu3e_gOBn9JN4TtLbu4tD8K00p6Xt-fdLevI7jL2ywiPqpuJWh2oAn5epcr5K87w2BjJnjA0Fsh_l8RmcnJfnW-zdai9M5IeYFtzIM0K8JgfXZthfk4Ze2OHbW4yuFQbgW7S3lpjzBZxOKyxEJS5Di1ZB-6VLREITP6nYX1--kZECcf9NaPPvosnrYDZko6MddneEkfwg6v0e23LdfXZ7Nv4of8B-XisG4rprORrUPLZP4r3nms_6du4RfvLTSKz6-8evyECNCJRjNLmIgZDHngD8YCLw5HrAy7sViT-O6fXYsu8v-bzjlmxpwUfS1uEhOzv68PnwOB07L6QWAZRIvdSQW2ug8OCtr5WV3nhTmdJizgOFuMxLZUG3zkJpvDRSIjSpTG1E3SpXPGLbXd-5J4xDBhZsrnReWDBK6Eq6UhqH01BbVV4l7PXq6zd2pCWn7hiXTSRUFg1pqgmaStjLSfZ7JOO4Ueo9KXGSIALtcKJffGlGf2yggFJoVeQ2w_wsKuUNJnGX1wCtMxneZG9lAs3o1UMjaLIoFE4CE_ZiGkZ_pJ8sunP9FclksiaWR5R5HC1mepICFJFC1wmrNmxp41E3R7r518D5rQhY1VnC3gSr-8frNyeHn2bh6On_CO-yO4J2doSC9D22vVxcuWeIt5bmeXCrP9wXKc8 priority: 102 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
Title | Development and validation of a Modified Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment as a nutritional assessment tool in cancer patients |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjcsm.12872 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34862759 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2625928862 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2606924372 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8818590 https://doaj.org/article/43452a831c0847278fb212e1944deb02 |
Volume | 13 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Na9wwEBVtCqWX0vTTabKotJcW3NjyWJKPSUgIgQ1L28DejCRLZENql-zmnj9Q6G_sL-lI8jq7JLSXXoyxxiBLT6M3aPyGkA-GOWTdPrnV4jSAy8tUWifSPK-0hsxqbUKC7Ck_PoOTaTldKfXlc8KiPHAcuF0ooGRKFrnJ0JEyIZ1Gb2sx9obG6igjiXveSjAVfDDwnIfyrMz_K10iCxq0SdnuhZl__4yOWbC13SiI9t_HNO8mTK4S2bATHT0jT3sKSfdi1zfJA9s-J4_H_SH5C_JzJRGIqrahCKZZLJ1EO0cVHXfNzCH1pJMoqvr75ldUn0b2SdGTXEQnSGM9ALo3iHdSNcfX26WAP7ap27ZF113SWUuNx9EV7QVb5y_J2dHht4PjtK-6kBokTyx1XEFujIbCgTOukoY77bTQpcH9DiRyMselAdVYA6V2XHOOtEToSrOqkbZ4RTbarrVvCIUMDJhcqrwwoCVTgtuSa4shqBHCyYR8XI5-bXpJcl8Z47KOYsqs9jNVh5lKyPvB9kcU4rjXat9P4mDhxbPDA4RU3UOq_hekErK9hEDdr-h5zXygyCQGgAl5NzTjWvQHLKq13bW3yXjlFR7R5nVEzNCTAqQXhK4SItawtNbV9ZZ2dh70vqUnVVWWkE8BdX_5_Prk4Os43G39j4F4S54w_7dHSFLfJhuLq2u7gxxsoUfkIYMJXsVUjMij_cPTyZdRWIJ4HYP8A0nSM8Y |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtQwEB2VrQS8IO4EChgBDyCFJo7jOA8ItaXV9rKrClqpb2ns2O1WJSmbrRDfwL_wjYydS7ui6lvfongSJZnJ-NgenwPwTlGDqNsWt2p0AzNh7AttEj8MUylZoKVUrkB2zIf7bOsgPliAv91eGFtW2eVEl6iLStk58mVqgToVCMC_nP30rWqUXV3tJDSasNjWv3_hkK3-vPkV_fue0o31vbWh36oK-ArBAfUNz1molGSRYUaZVChupJGJjBXmcyYQcxguFMsLrVgsDZecY7ebyFTStBA6wvvegkUW4VBmAIur6-Pdb_2sjqUv504Wlto92jGir54TlS6fqPrHJ-wQEjrXCzqxgKsQ7v-FmpcBtOsBN-7DvRa6kpUm1h7Agi4fwu1Ruzj_CP5cKkAieVkQDOJJI9lEKkNyMqqKiUHIS3YbMle_4bxGzEswf500qZc0KgRkpacMJXmNF5edbAC25Rdts6o6JZOSKBu9U9LSxNaPYf9GvPIEBmVV6mdAWMAUU6HIw0gxKWiecB1zqXHgq5LECA8-dN8-Uy0RutXjOM0aCmeaWT9lzk8evO1tzxr6jyutVq0LewtL2e1OVNOjrM0AGYtYTHMRhSpAREATYSTCBh2mjBVaBniTpS4AsjaP1NlF1Hvwpm_GDGCXdfJSV-fWJuCp5ZVEm6dNvPRPEjFhaahTD5K5SJp71PmWcnLsWMaFhXJp4MFHF3PXvH62tfZ95I6eX_8Or-HOcG-0k-1sjrdfwF1qd5K4AvglGMym5_ol4ruZfNX-VAQOb_o__gdM8WZp |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwELVKkSouiG8CBYyAA0hhE8exnQNCpWXVD7aqBJX2ZmLHhq1KUjZbIX4D_4hfx9hO0q6oeustiidRkhmPn-Pxewi91MQC6nbFrQbcQG2ax8JYHqdpoRRNjFLaF8jus-1DujvNpyvob78XxpVV9jnRJ-qq0e4f-Yg4oE4EAPCR7coiDrbG709-xk5Byq209nIaIUT2zO9fMH1r3-1sga9fETL--GVzO-4UBmINQIHElpU01VrRzFKrbSE0s8oqrnINuZ0KwB-WCU3LymiaK8sUYzAEc1UoUlTCZHDfa-g6z_LU9TE-5cP_HUdkzrxALHG7tXPAYQM7Khkd6fbHWxgaOFkaD71swEVY9_-SzfNQ2o-F41voZgdi8UaIuttoxdR30NqkW6a_i_6cK0XCZV1hCOdZEG_CjcUlnjTVzAL4xQeB1jUO7NeAfjFksqOQhHHQI8AbA3koLlu4uO4FBKCtPGtbNM0xntVYuzie444wtr2HDq_EJ_fRat3U5iHCNKGa6lSUaaapEqTkzORMGZgCa86tiNDr_ttL3VGiO2WOYxnInIl0fpLeTxF6MdieBCKQC60-OBcOFo68259o5t9klwskzWhOSpGlOgFsQLiwCgCESQtKK6MSuMl6HwCyyyitPIv_CD0fmiEXuAWesjbNqbNJWOEYJsHmQYiX4UkyKhwhdREhvhRJS4-63FLPvnu-ceFAXZFE6I2PuUteX-5ufp74o0eXv8MztAa9V37a2d97jG4Qt6XEV8Kvo9XF_NQ8AaC3UE99j8Lo61V34X_Nnmk5 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development+and+validation+of+a+Modified+Patient%E2%80%90Generated+Subjective+Global+Assessment+as+a+nutritional+assessment+tool+in+cancer+patients&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cachexia%2C+sarcopenia+and+muscle&rft.au=Zhenming+Fu&rft.au=Rui+Zhang&rft.au=Kun%E2%80%90Hua+Wang&rft.au=Ming%E2%80%90Hua+Cong&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.pub=Wiley&rft.issn=2190-5991&rft.eissn=2190-6009&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=354&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjcsm.12872&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_43452a831c0847278fb212e1944deb02 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2190-5991&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2190-5991&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2190-5991&client=summon |