Revisiting the relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular–arterial coupling

The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–art...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inESC Heart Failure Vol. 7; no. 5; pp. 2214 - 2222
Main Authors Mihaileanu, Serban, Antohi, Elena‐Laura
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.10.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice.
AbstractList The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice.
Abstract The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range . The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice.
Abstract The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice.
The aim of this article was to analyse in-depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF-VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single-beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF - 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ - 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same-direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non-linear time-varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in-depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice.
The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range . The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice.
The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice.
Author Mihaileanu, Serban
Antohi, Elena‐Laura
AuthorAffiliation 3 University for Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Carol Davila’ Bucharest Romania
2 Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases ‘C.C. Iliescu’ Bucharest Romania
1 Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Paris France
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Paris France
– name: 2 Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases ‘C.C. Iliescu’ Bucharest Romania
– name: 3 University for Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Carol Davila’ Bucharest Romania
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Serban
  surname: Mihaileanu
  fullname: Mihaileanu, Serban
  organization: Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Elena‐Laura
  surname: Antohi
  fullname: Antohi, Elena‐Laura
  email: laura.antohi@gmail.com
  organization: University for Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Carol Davila’
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ktFqFDEUhoNUbK298QFkwBsRtk0yyUzmRpDS2kJBKHodkszJbpZssiYzW3rnO_iGPomZTi1bL7zKIfn4-M_JeY0OQgyA0FuCTwnG9AxWlp4SKgR-gY4o5nzBBaUHe_UhOsl5jTEmvCGcslfosKaNaGrSHKH1LexcdoMLy2pYQZXAq8HFkFduW2kY7gBC5cEO1Q7CkJwZvUoVrMFMVGWTmgsV-n3i989fKg2QnPKViePWF_8b9NIqn-Hk8TxG3y8vvp1fLW6-frk-_3yzMJwwvKDQdULrjlDdCaEUGMOg6YhiDDOwhNY9x6KxRmnTa9Io3VramR63hjSM8PoYXc_ePqq13Ca3UeleRuXkw0VMS1myOeNBUiugFRY3QCzjQmiDmRa1BdMSIxgrrk-zazvqDfRm6lD5Z9LnL8Gt5DLuZFsGTVlXBB8eBSn-GCEPcuOyAe9VgDhmWSjOO8paUtD3_6DrOKZQRlUo1uIaEzIl-jhTJsWcE9inMATLaSPktBHyYSMK_G4__hP69_8LQGbgznm4_49KXlxd0ln6B3PHxWA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_pan_14277
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40635_024_00642_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atherosclerosis_2023_04_010
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2022_948231
crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_16285
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hlc_2023_12_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejphar_2022_175014
crossref_primary_10_1142_S2810958923300032
crossref_primary_10_1177_10781552221118530
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacadv_2023_100431
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2021_750965
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40560_024_00730_6
crossref_primary_10_47803_rjc_2021_31_2_351
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.085
10.1161/01.CIR.86.2.513
10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00374-X
10.1161/01.CIR.94.10.2497
10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01651-5
10.1152/physiol.00056.2018
10.1161/01.RES.65.2.483
10.1155/2013/235194
10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02270-2
10.1016/0002-8703(93)90756-Y
10.1097/00000542-199101000-00026
10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.094
10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.019
10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061916
10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.061
10.1093/ehjci/jev014
10.1136/openhrt-2016-000524
10.15420/cfr.2017:4:2
10.1016/j.hfc.2007.10.001
10.1016/j.ccl.2011.06.004
10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.050
10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.041
10.1152/ajpheart.00138.2005
10.1152/ajpheart.00760.2011
10.1002/ejhf.1436
10.1016/j.euje.2005.06.010
10.1111/echo.12264
10.1093/ehjci/jew142
10.1152/ajpheart.1983.245.5.H773
10.1136/openhrt-2016-000465
10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.164
10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.013
10.1161/01.RES.54.5.595
10.1007/s00134-016-4351-2
10.1093/eurheartj/ehz550
10.1093/ehjci/jeaa018
10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.07.395
10.1152/japplphysiol.90600.2008
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology
2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology
– notice: 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
– notice: 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
WIN
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7X7
7XB
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
PIMPY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1002/ehf2.12880
DatabaseName Wiley Open Access
Wiley Online Library
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database
CrossRef

PubMed


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: 7X7
  name: ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库
  url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate LVEF and VAC relationship
EISSN 2055-5822
EndPage 2222
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_2f8e78f06e1f4588bc04b83fec71c844
10_1002_ehf2_12880
32686316
EHF212880
Genre reviewArticle
Journal Article
Review
GroupedDBID 0R~
1OC
24P
53G
5VS
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AAHHS
ABUWG
ACCFJ
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADKYN
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AFKRA
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AOIJS
AVUZU
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
DIK
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
FYUFA
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
KQ8
M~E
OK1
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RPM
UKHRP
WIN
ITC
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5140-2e998bb912b988aaecc4e691a4404ef123d5086fcabcdb16ab7f29cd07c164153
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 2055-5822
IngestDate Thu Jul 04 21:07:31 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 17 21:25:29 EDT 2024
Fri Jun 28 16:50:08 EDT 2024
Fri Sep 13 02:49:24 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 19:05:58 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 08:26:15 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 01:36:28 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Effective arterial elastance
Left ventricle elastance
Phi number
Ventricular-arterial coupling
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5140-2e998bb912b988aaecc4e691a4404ef123d5086fcabcdb16ab7f29cd07c164153
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524249/
PMID 32686316
PQID 2447030114
PQPubID 4368362
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2f8e78f06e1f4588bc04b83fec71c844
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7524249
proquest_miscellaneous_2425592471
proquest_journals_2447030114
crossref_primary_10_1002_ehf2_12880
pubmed_primary_32686316
wiley_primary_10_1002_ehf2_12880_EHF212880
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2020
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2020
  text: October 2020
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle ESC Heart Failure
PublicationTitleAlternate ESC Heart Fail
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
– name: Wiley
References 2004; 44
2015; 16
2017; 3
1989; 65
2017; 4
2020; 41
1991; 74
2013; 62
2019; 34
2017; 23
1985; 6
1996; 94
2006; 7
2008; 105
2008; 4
1993; 125
2011; 150
1996; 10
2011; 301
1983; 245
2009; 54
2016; 3
2013; 2013
2019; 21
2005; 289
2002; 40
1984; 54
2018; 255
2013; 30
2015; 198
2016; 42
2016; 84
2001; 38
2017; 18
2020; 21
1992; 86
1998; 32
2011; 29
2009; 103
2007; 49
e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_29_1
Migliore R (e_1_2_8_33_1) 2016; 84
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_25_1
e_1_2_8_26_1
e_1_2_8_27_1
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
Cohen‐Solal A (e_1_2_8_38_1) 1996; 10
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
e_1_2_8_21_1
e_1_2_8_42_1
e_1_2_8_22_1
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_41_1
e_1_2_8_40_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_39_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_36_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_35_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_37_1
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_34_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_30_1
References_xml – volume: 34
  start-page: 250
  year: 2019
  end-page: 263
  article-title: Ratiology and a complementary class of metrics for cardiovascular investigations
  publication-title: Physiology (Bethesda)
– volume: 301
  start-page: H1916
  year: 2011
  end-page: H1923
  article-title: Noninvasive quantification of left ventricular elastance and ventricular–arterial coupling using three‐dimensional echocardiography and arterial tonometry
  publication-title: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
– volume: 38
  start-page: 2028
  year: 2001
  end-page: 2034
  article-title: Noninvasive single‐beat determination of left ventricular end‐systolic elastance in humans
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1528
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1534
  article-title: Heart rate reduction with esmolol is associated with improved arterial elastance in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study
  publication-title: Intensive Care Med
– volume: 54
  start-page: 410
  year: 2009
  end-page: 418
  article-title: Contractility and ventricular systolic stiffening in hypertensive heart disease insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 44
  start-page: 611
  year: 2004
  end-page: 617
  article-title: Age and gender affect ventricular–vascular coupling during aerobic exercise
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 18
  start-page: 990
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1000
  article-title: Impact of age and sex on left ventricular function determined by coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the prospective multicentre CONFIRM study
  publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 150
  start-page: 239
  year: 2011
  end-page: 242
  article-title: The human heart: application of the golden ratio and angle
  publication-title: Int J Cardiol
– volume: 2013
  year: 2013
  article-title: End‐systolic elastance and ventricular–arterial coupling reserve predict cardiac events in patients with negative stress echocardiography
  publication-title: Biomed Res Int
– volume: 84
  start-page: 304
  year: 2016
  end-page: 309
  article-title: Ventricular–arterial coupling in severe aortic stenosis: relation with symptoms and heart failure
  publication-title: Arget J Cardiol TBC
– volume: 289
  start-page: H501
  year: 2005
  end-page: H512
  article-title: Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure–volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers
  publication-title: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
– volume: 29
  start-page: 447
  year: 2011
  end-page: 459
  article-title: Ventricular–vascular interaction in heart failure
  publication-title: Cardiol Clin
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1249
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1257
  article-title: Routinely reported ejection fraction and mortality in clinical practice: where does the nadir of risk lie?
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– volume: 86
  start-page: 513
  year: 1992
  end-page: 521
  article-title: Effective arterial elastance as index of arterial vascular load in humans
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1431
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1436
  article-title: Physiologic limits of left ventricular hypertrophy in elite junior athletes: relevance to differential diagnosis of athlete's heart and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 54
  start-page: 595
  year: 1984
  end-page: 602
  article-title: Effect of arterial impedance changes on the end‐systolic pressure–volume relation
  publication-title: Circ Res
– volume: 198
  start-page: 85
  year: 2015
  end-page: 86
  article-title: Left ventricular diameters as a reflection of “extreme and mean ratio”
  publication-title: Int J Cardiol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 402
  year: 2019
  end-page: 424
  article-title: The role of ventricular–arterial coupling in cardiac disease and heart failure: assessment, clinical implications and therapeutic interventions. A consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Aorta & Peripheral Vascular Diseases, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, and Heart Failure Association
  publication-title: Eur J Heart Fail
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1143
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1150
  article-title: Age‐ and gender‐dependent left ventricular remodeling
  publication-title: Echocardiography
– volume: 49
  start-page: 972
  year: 2007
  end-page: 981
  article-title: Ventricular structure and function in hypertensive participants with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction: the Cardiovascular Health Study
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 94
  start-page: 2497
  year: 1996
  end-page: 2506
  article-title: Single‐beat estimation of end‐systolic pressure–volume relation in humans. A new method with the potential for noninvasive application
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 3
  year: 2016
  article-title: Importance of length and external diameter in left ventricular geometry. Normal values from the HUNT Study
  publication-title: Open Heart
– volume: 21
  start-page: 375
  year: 2020
  end-page: 377
  article-title: Insights from physiology applied to interpretation of supranormal ejection fraction in women
  publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 4
  start-page: 23
  year: 2008
  end-page: 36
  article-title: Ventricular–vascular interaction in heart failure
  publication-title: Heart Fail Clin
– volume: 245
  start-page: H773
  year: 1983
  end-page: H780
  article-title: Left ventricular interaction with arterial load studied in isolated canine ventricle
  publication-title: Am J Physiol
– volume: 10
  start-page: 111
  year: 1996
  end-page: 116
  article-title: Effects of aging on left ventricular–arterial coupling in man: assessment by means of arterial effective and left ventricular elastances
  publication-title: J Hum Hypertens
– volume: 6
  start-page: 647
  year: 1985
  end-page: 655
  article-title: Range of normal values for left and right ventricular ejection fraction at rest and during exercise assessed by radionuclide angiocardiography
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1659
  year: 1993
  end-page: 1666
  article-title: Left ventricular–arterial coupling relations in the normal human heart
  publication-title: Am Heart J
– volume: 4
  year: 2017
  article-title: Cardiac mechanics and dysfunction with anthracyclines in the community: results from the PREDICT study
  publication-title: Open Heart
– volume: 23
  start-page: 659
  year: 2017
  end-page: 665
  article-title: Measures of ventricular–arterial coupling and incident heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a matched case–control analysis
  publication-title: J Card Fail
– volume: 255
  start-page: 105
  year: 2018
  end-page: 110
  article-title: Ejection fraction as related to basic components in the left and right ventricular volume domains
  publication-title: Int J Cardiol
– volume: 7
  start-page: 293
  year: 2006
  end-page: 297
  article-title: What is a “normal” right ventricle?
  publication-title: Eur J Echocardiogr
– volume: 16
  start-page: 233
  year: 2015
  end-page: 270
  article-title: Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging
  publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 62
  start-page: 1165
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1172
  article-title: Ventricular–arterial coupling, remodeling, and prognosis in chronic heart failure
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1221
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1227
  article-title: Coupled systolic–ventricular and vascular stiffening with age: implications for pressure regulation and cardiac reserve in the elderly
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 103
  start-page: 845
  year: 2009
  end-page: 851
  article-title: Comparison of ventricular structure and function in Chinese patients with heart failure and ejection fractions >55% versus 40% to 55% versus <40%
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
– volume: 74
  start-page: 172
  year: 1991
  end-page: 183
  article-title: Ejection fraction revisited
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
– volume: 105
  start-page: 1342
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1351
  article-title: Arterial‐ventricular coupling: mechanistic insights into cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise
  publication-title: J Appl Physiol (1985)
– volume: 65
  start-page: 483
  year: 1989
  end-page: 493
  article-title: Ventriculoarterial coupling in normal and failing heart in humans
  publication-title: Circ Res
– volume: 3
  start-page: 12
  year: 2017
  end-page: 18
  article-title: Ventricular–arterial coupling in chronic heart failure
  publication-title: Card Fail Rev
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.085
– volume: 84
  start-page: 304
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  article-title: Ventricular–arterial coupling in severe aortic stenosis: relation with symptoms and heart failure
  publication-title: Arget J Cardiol TBC
  contributor:
    fullname: Migliore R
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.86.2.513
– ident: e_1_2_8_42_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00374-X
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.10.2497
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01651-5
– ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
  doi: 10.1152/physiol.00056.2018
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1161/01.RES.65.2.483
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1155/2013/235194
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02270-2
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90756-Y
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-199101000-00026
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.094
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.019
– ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061916
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.061
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000524
– ident: e_1_2_8_41_1
  doi: 10.15420/cfr.2017:4:2
– volume: 10
  start-page: 111
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_8_38_1
  article-title: Effects of aging on left ventricular–arterial coupling in man: assessment by means of arterial effective and left ventricular elastances
  publication-title: J Hum Hypertens
  contributor:
    fullname: Cohen‐Solal A
– ident: e_1_2_8_40_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2007.10.001
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.06.004
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.050
– ident: e_1_2_8_39_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.041
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00138.2005
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00760.2011
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1436
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2005.06.010
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  doi: 10.1111/echo.12264
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew142
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1983.245.5.H773
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000465
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.164
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.013
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1161/01.RES.54.5.595
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4351-2
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz550
– ident: e_1_2_8_37_1
  doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa018
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.07.395
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90600.2008
SSID ssj0001561524
Score 2.2514791
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used...
The aim of this article was to analyse in-depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used...
Abstract The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly...
Abstract The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2214
SubjectTerms Effective arterial elastance
Ejection fraction
Heart failure
Left ventricle elastance
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Phi number
Review
Reviews
Sepsis
Ventricular–arterial coupling
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09b9swED0UGYIuRZP0Q01SsGinAmpMWiKlMQlsGAXcoWiAbARJkXWCQg5ce89_yD_ML8kdKRsyWiRLNkHiQPGJvHfiu0eAL0iBy6Z0MjeGi7xwSuYYhmTODa6WyIhrE886nP6Qk4vi-2V52TvqizRhyR44DdyJCJVXVRhIzwNVVVo3KGw1DN4p7qoiOYHyspdMdfXBGJiKjR-pOPGzIL7hYkz-j70IFI36_8cu_xVJ9slrjD7j1_Cqo43sNHV3D174dh92p93G-AFc_4xV4qRhZkjp2GKtcZtd3bBOi8X--LBkpG-MP_3MgvnrKMRqWVik-gZm2qbf4v72Lmo-8SNlbr6i6t3fb-BiPPp1Psm7YxRyV5J4U3hMqaytubB1VRmDoBVe1tyQNaAPGLoaZGkyOGNdY7k0VgVRu2agHOZSuCK-hZ123vr3wAamLIK0btg42jJVxnqOQZA3pjCi8jKDz-uh1TfJLUMnX2ShCQAdAcjgjEZ904IcruMNxF13uOuncM_gaI2Z7qbdX41cRaUcL4NPm8c4YWgXxLR-vqI2lEVh53kG7xLEm54gl63kkON7qC3wt7q6_aS9mkVTblVSoU2dwdf4mTzy-no0GYt49eE5BuIQXgr6BxAFhkews1ys_DESpaX9GOfEAz6BEzk
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NatwwEB7SFEovIf13mxaV9lRwd6W1JfsUkpJlKaSH0sDehCRL2YRgb53de9-hb9gn6Yxsb3Zpyc3YAkua0cyn0TcjgI8IgfMqdzI1hos0c0qm6IZkyg1aS0TEpYl3HZ5_k7OL7Os8n-_BbMiFIVrlYBOjoa4aRzHyEboh1cH3kbEUBXCr0fHyZ0r3R9E5a3-ZxgN4yAXCCtRsNVd30RaECbnINvVJxcgvgviMxpnqQW55pFi4_39o81_S5DaYjd5oeggHPYxkJ53cn8Cer5_Co_P-oPwZXH-PWePEaWYI8Vg7cN4WV0vWc7PYjQ8rRnzHGAQ0LfPXkZhVs9B2-Q7M1NV2iz-_fkcOKCotc82asnkvn8PF9OzHl1naX6uQupzInMLjFsvakgtbFoUxKMTMy5IbKhXoA7qyClGbDM5YV1kujVVBlK4aK4d7K7SQL2C_bmr_CtjY5FmQ1k0qR0eoyljP0SnyymRGFF4m8GGYWr3sqmfork6y0CQAHQWQwCnN-qYFVbyOL5r2UvcLSItQeFWEsfQ8UHatxT_aYhK8U9wVWZbA0SAz3S_DW32nNAm833zGBUSnIqb2zZra0K4KO88TeNmJeNMTxLaFnHAch9oR_k5Xd7_UV4tYpFvllHhTJvApqsk9w9dns6mIT6_vH8MbeCxotx-phEewv2rX_i1CopV9F7X9L-N5DhU
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Wiley Open Access
  dbid: 24P
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1di9QwFL0sK4gv4rfVVSL6JNSdZJqPgi8qOwzCiogL-xaSNNnZZeks3Zl3_4P_0F_ivWmns4Mi-FamGZr25uaem5x7AvAGIbBsZFClc1yUVdCqxDCkSu5wtkREXLt81uHxFzU_qT6fytM9eL-phen1IcYFN_KMPF-Tgzt_fbgVDY2LJN7h7GowYb-FuMbQmBbV1-0KC0IDmU-1FRMpS4l9GPVJxeH27zsRKQv3_w1t_kmavAlmczSa3YO7A4xkH3q734e92D6A28fDRvlDuPiWq8aJ08wQ4rFuw3lbnF-xgZvFLmNaMeI75kVA17F4kYlZLUtdX-_AXNvcbPHrx8_MAcVBy8JyTdW8Z4_gZHb0_dO8HI5VKIMkMqeImGJ5X3Pha2OcQyNWUdXckVRgTBjKGkRtKgXnQ-O5cl4nUYdmogPmVjhDPob9dtnGp8AmTlZJ-TBtAm2haucjx6DIG1c5YaIq4PXm09qrXj3D9jrJwpIBbDZAAR_pq48tSPE6_7DszuzgQFYkE7VJExV5oupaj0_0Zppi0DyYqirgYGMzO7jhtUXsovucr4BX4210INoVcW1crqkNZVXYeV7Ak97EY08Q2xo15fgeesf4O13dvdOeL7JIt5ZUeFMX8DYPk3-8vj2az0S-evY_jZ_DHUG5fyYWHsD-qlvHFwiQVv5l9oPf_iQM4w
  priority: 102
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
Title Revisiting the relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular–arterial coupling
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fehf2.12880
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686316
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2447030114/abstract/
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2425592471
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7524249
https://doaj.org/article/2f8e78f06e1f4588bc04b83fec71c844
Volume 7
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NitswEB42Wyi9lP6v221QaU8FJ5FsS_KxuySEQpawdCE3I8nSJsuuE9zk3nfoG_ZJOpLtkNDSQy_GWALJmpHmG-mbEcAnhMBZmRkeK0VZnBrBYzRDPKYKV0tExLkKdx3Orvj0Jv26yBYnkHWxMIG0b_RqUN0_DKrVMnArNw9m2PHEhvPZpch8UEM-7EFPJMmBi96GBqNNSvepSNnQLh0b4Dos_bVvCFckT_z15gd2KKTr_xvG_JMqeQhhgw2aPIOnLXgkX5pOPocTW72Ax7P2ePwl3F2HWHHPZCYI7EjdMd2Wqw1pGVnk3rot8SzHsPWnamLvAh2rIq5uohyIqsrDGr9-_AzMT1RVYtY7H8N7-wpuJuNvl9O4vUwhNpmncDKLjpXWOWU6l1IpFF1qeU6VTxBoHRqwErEad0ZpU2rKlRaO5aYcCYMeFa6Lr-G0Wlf2DMhIZanj2iSl8QenQmlL0RTSUqWKScsj-NgNbbFpcmYUTXZkVnhZFEEWEVz4Ud_X8Hmuw4d1fVu00i6Yk1ZIN-KWOh9Tq7FFLRNnjaBGpmkE553MinbyfS8QsYjG04vgw74Yp40_C1GVXe98He9LYedpBG8aEe970qlIBOJI-EddPS5BTQ2puVvNjOBzUJN__H4xnk5YeHv73828gyfMu_-BW3gOp9t6Z98jRtrqPvRYOsenWIg-PLoYX82v-2G_oR9my2_RnRfG
link.rule.ids 230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,11589,12083,21416,27957,27958,31754,31755,33779,33780,43345,43840,46087,46511,50849,50958,53827,53829,74102,74659
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1fb9MwED9BJwEvE39HxgAjeEIKq13HSZ4QQ60KrBWaNmlvlu3Y6yaUlKx95zvwDfkknB23awXaW5RYiu2z7353_t0Z4B1C4KzKjEiVoizlJhcpmiGRUoXaEhFxqcJdh5OpGJ_xr-fZeQy4XUda5UonBkVdNcbHyA_RDOUdfP84_5n6W6P86Wq8QuMu7PABuio92DkaTr-f3ERZEB5kjK_rkrJDO3PsAyplXwdywxKFgv3_Q5n_kiU3QWywQqOHsBvhI_nUyfsR3LH1Y7g3iQfkT-DqJGSLey4zQWhH2hXXbXY5J5GTRX5YtyCe5xiCf6ol9ioQsmri2i7Pgai62mzx59fvwP3ExUpMs_RZvBdP4Ww0PP08TuN1CqnJPImTWXSttC4p02VRKIXC41aUVPkSgdahCasQrQlnlDaVpkLp3LHSVP3coE-FmvEZ9Oqmts-B9FXGndBmUBl_dJorbSkaQ1oprlhhRQJvV1Mr513VDNnVR2bSC0AGASRw5Gd93cJXug4vmvZCxo0jmStsXri-sNT5rFqNf9TFwFmTU1NwnsDBSmYybr9rebNYEniz_owbx5-GqNo2S9_Ge1PYeZrAXifidU8Q0xZiQHEc-Zbwt7q6_aW-nIXi3HnmE27KBN6HZXLL8OVwPGLhaf_2MbyG--PTybE8_jL99gIeMO_xBzrhAfQW7dK-RFi00K_i2v8LgWwOrg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwEB5BkSouiHdTChjBCSns2pvYyQnx6Gp5tEKISnuLbMfutkLJNt298x_4h_wSZhzvdleg3qLEUmzPeOaz_c0MwCuEwHmdW5lqzUWaWSVTdEMy5RqtJSLiUodah0fHcnKSfZ7m08h_uoy0ypVNDIa6bi2dkQ_QDakevg98pEV8-zh-O79IqYIU3bTGcho34RZ6ySFVM1BTdXXegkAhF9k6Q6kYuJkXb9A8U0bIDZ8UUvf_D2_-S5vchLPBH43vwp0IJNm7XvL34IZr7sPuUbwqfwDn30PcOLGaGYI81q1Yb7OzOYvsLPbT-QUjxmM4BtQdc-eBmtUw3_URD0w39WaLP79-BxYoqi2z7ZLieU8fwsn48MeHSRoLK6Q2JzqncLjJMqbkwpRFoTWKMXOy5JqSBTqPzqxG3Ca91cbWhkttlBelrYfK4u4KbeQj2Gnaxu0BG-o889LYUW3pElVp4zi6RV7rTIvCyQRerqa2mvf5M6o-U7KoSABVEEAC72nW1y0o53V40XanVVxClfCFU4UfSsc9xdca_KMpRt5ZxW2RZQkcrGRWxYV4WV2pTQIv1p9xCdG9iG5cu6Q2tK_CzvMEHvciXvcE0W0hRxzHobaEv9XV7S_N2Syk6VY5hd6UCbwOanLN8KvDyViEp_3rx_AcdlHpq6-fjr88gduCtv6BV3gAO4tu6Z4iPlqYZ0Hx_wJfixF0
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting+the+relationship+between+left+ventricular+ejection+fraction+and+ventricular-arterial+coupling&rft.jtitle=ESC+Heart+Failure&rft.au=Mihaileanu%2C+Serban&rft.au=Antohi%2C+Elena-Laura&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.eissn=2055-5822&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fehf2.12880&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32686316&rft.externalDocID=32686316
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2055-5822&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2055-5822&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2055-5822&client=summon