Revisiting the relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular–arterial coupling
The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–art...
Saved in:
Published in | ESC Heart Failure Vol. 7; no. 5; pp. 2214 - 2222 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.10.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice. Abstract The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range . The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice. Abstract The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice. The aim of this article was to analyse in-depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF-VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single-beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF - 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ - 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same-direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non-linear time-varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in-depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice. The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range . The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice. The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used formulas for the calculation of LV elastance (Ees), volume intercept at 0 mmHg pressure (V0), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) as are validated today. We analyse the mathematical resulting consequences, raising the question on the physiological validity. To our knowledge, some of the following mathematical consequences have never been published. On the basis of studies demonstrating that normal LV dimensions and LVEF have a Gaussian unimodal distribution, we considered that the normal modal LVEF is 62% or very close to it. Expressed as a fraction, it is 0.62, that is, the reciprocal of the Phi number (namely, 1/Φ ~ 0.618). Applying Euclid's mathematical law on the extreme and mean ratio (the golden ratio), we studied the LVEF–VAC relationship in normal hearts. The simplification of the VAC formula (with V0 = 0) leads to false physiological results; V0 extraction from single‐beat Chen's formula leads to high negative results in normal subjects; based on the Euclid law, LVEF and Ea/Ees will be equal for a ratio value of 0.618 (62%) where V0 cannot be different from 0 mL; LVEF and VAC inverse relationship formula (Ea/Ees = 1/LVEF − 1) is reducible to a fundamental property of Phi: 1/Φ = (Φ − 1), being valid only if LVEF = VAC at a 0.618 value; according to this restriction, Vo can only be 0 mL, thus describing a very limited range. The Ea/Ees ratio, owing to its mathematical more dynamic behaviour, can be more sensitive than LVEF, being a valuable clinical tool in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced EF, acute unstable haemodynamic situations, where Ees and Ea variations are disproportionate. However, the application is doubtful in HF with preserved EF where Ees and Ea may have same‐direction augmentation. The modified VAC formula suffers from oversimplification, reducing it to a dimensionless ratio, which is supposed to approximate non‐linear time‐varying functions. Thus, we advocate for caution and in‐depth understanding when using simplified formulas in clinical practice. |
Author | Mihaileanu, Serban Antohi, Elena‐Laura |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 University for Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Carol Davila’ Bucharest Romania 2 Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases ‘C.C. Iliescu’ Bucharest Romania 1 Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Paris France |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Paris France – name: 2 Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases ‘C.C. Iliescu’ Bucharest Romania – name: 3 University for Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Carol Davila’ Bucharest Romania |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Serban surname: Mihaileanu fullname: Mihaileanu, Serban organization: Institut Mutualiste Montsouris – sequence: 2 givenname: Elena‐Laura surname: Antohi fullname: Antohi, Elena‐Laura email: laura.antohi@gmail.com organization: University for Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Carol Davila’ |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ktFqFDEUhoNUbK298QFkwBsRtk0yyUzmRpDS2kJBKHodkszJbpZssiYzW3rnO_iGPomZTi1bL7zKIfn4-M_JeY0OQgyA0FuCTwnG9AxWlp4SKgR-gY4o5nzBBaUHe_UhOsl5jTEmvCGcslfosKaNaGrSHKH1LexcdoMLy2pYQZXAq8HFkFduW2kY7gBC5cEO1Q7CkJwZvUoVrMFMVGWTmgsV-n3i989fKg2QnPKViePWF_8b9NIqn-Hk8TxG3y8vvp1fLW6-frk-_3yzMJwwvKDQdULrjlDdCaEUGMOg6YhiDDOwhNY9x6KxRmnTa9Io3VramR63hjSM8PoYXc_ePqq13Ca3UeleRuXkw0VMS1myOeNBUiugFRY3QCzjQmiDmRa1BdMSIxgrrk-zazvqDfRm6lD5Z9LnL8Gt5DLuZFsGTVlXBB8eBSn-GCEPcuOyAe9VgDhmWSjOO8paUtD3_6DrOKZQRlUo1uIaEzIl-jhTJsWcE9inMATLaSPktBHyYSMK_G4__hP69_8LQGbgznm4_49KXlxd0ln6B3PHxWA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_pan_14277 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40635_024_00642_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atherosclerosis_2023_04_010 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2022_948231 crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_16285 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hlc_2023_12_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejphar_2022_175014 crossref_primary_10_1142_S2810958923300032 crossref_primary_10_1177_10781552221118530 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacadv_2023_100431 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2021_750965 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40560_024_00730_6 crossref_primary_10_47803_rjc_2021_31_2_351 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.085 10.1161/01.CIR.86.2.513 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00374-X 10.1161/01.CIR.94.10.2497 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01651-5 10.1152/physiol.00056.2018 10.1161/01.RES.65.2.483 10.1155/2013/235194 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02270-2 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90756-Y 10.1097/00000542-199101000-00026 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.094 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.019 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061916 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.061 10.1093/ehjci/jev014 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000524 10.15420/cfr.2017:4:2 10.1016/j.hfc.2007.10.001 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.06.004 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.050 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.041 10.1152/ajpheart.00138.2005 10.1152/ajpheart.00760.2011 10.1002/ejhf.1436 10.1016/j.euje.2005.06.010 10.1111/echo.12264 10.1093/ehjci/jew142 10.1152/ajpheart.1983.245.5.H773 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000465 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.164 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.013 10.1161/01.RES.54.5.595 10.1007/s00134-016-4351-2 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz550 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa018 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.07.395 10.1152/japplphysiol.90600.2008 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology – notice: 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. – notice: 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | 24P WIN NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1002/ehf2.12880 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Open Access Wiley Online Library PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: 7X7 name: ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库 url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | LVEF and VAC relationship |
EISSN | 2055-5822 |
EndPage | 2222 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_2f8e78f06e1f4588bc04b83fec71c844 10_1002_ehf2_12880 32686316 EHF212880 |
Genre | reviewArticle Journal Article Review |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 1OC 24P 53G 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAHHS ABUWG ACCFJ ACXQS ADBBV ADKYN ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AFKRA AIWBW AJBDE ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AOIJS AVUZU BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU DIK EBS EJD EMOBN FYUFA GODZA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH KQ8 M~E OK1 PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RPM UKHRP WIN ITC NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5140-2e998bb912b988aaecc4e691a4404ef123d5086fcabcdb16ab7f29cd07c164153 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2055-5822 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 04 21:07:31 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:25:29 EDT 2024 Fri Jun 28 16:50:08 EDT 2024 Fri Sep 13 02:49:24 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 19:05:58 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:26:15 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 01:36:28 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | Effective arterial elastance Left ventricle elastance Phi number Ventricular-arterial coupling Left ventricular ejection fraction |
Language | English |
License | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5140-2e998bb912b988aaecc4e691a4404ef123d5086fcabcdb16ab7f29cd07c164153 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524249/ |
PMID | 32686316 |
PQID | 2447030114 |
PQPubID | 4368362 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2f8e78f06e1f4588bc04b83fec71c844 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7524249 proquest_miscellaneous_2425592471 proquest_journals_2447030114 crossref_primary_10_1002_ehf2_12880 pubmed_primary_32686316 wiley_primary_10_1002_ehf2_12880_EHF212880 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | October 2020 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2020 text: October 2020 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Oxford – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | ESC Heart Failure |
PublicationTitleAlternate | ESC Heart Fail |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc – name: Wiley |
References | 2004; 44 2015; 16 2017; 3 1989; 65 2017; 4 2020; 41 1991; 74 2013; 62 2019; 34 2017; 23 1985; 6 1996; 94 2006; 7 2008; 105 2008; 4 1993; 125 2011; 150 1996; 10 2011; 301 1983; 245 2009; 54 2016; 3 2013; 2013 2019; 21 2005; 289 2002; 40 1984; 54 2018; 255 2013; 30 2015; 198 2016; 42 2016; 84 2001; 38 2017; 18 2020; 21 1992; 86 1998; 32 2011; 29 2009; 103 2007; 49 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 Migliore R (e_1_2_8_33_1) 2016; 84 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 Cohen‐Solal A (e_1_2_8_38_1) 1996; 10 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_42_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_41_1 e_1_2_8_40_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_39_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_37_1 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_30_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 34 start-page: 250 year: 2019 end-page: 263 article-title: Ratiology and a complementary class of metrics for cardiovascular investigations publication-title: Physiology (Bethesda) – volume: 301 start-page: H1916 year: 2011 end-page: H1923 article-title: Noninvasive quantification of left ventricular elastance and ventricular–arterial coupling using three‐dimensional echocardiography and arterial tonometry publication-title: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol – volume: 38 start-page: 2028 year: 2001 end-page: 2034 article-title: Noninvasive single‐beat determination of left ventricular end‐systolic elastance in humans publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 42 start-page: 1528 year: 2016 end-page: 1534 article-title: Heart rate reduction with esmolol is associated with improved arterial elastance in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study publication-title: Intensive Care Med – volume: 54 start-page: 410 year: 2009 end-page: 418 article-title: Contractility and ventricular systolic stiffening in hypertensive heart disease insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 44 start-page: 611 year: 2004 end-page: 617 article-title: Age and gender affect ventricular–vascular coupling during aerobic exercise publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 18 start-page: 990 year: 2017 end-page: 1000 article-title: Impact of age and sex on left ventricular function determined by coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the prospective multicentre CONFIRM study publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging – volume: 150 start-page: 239 year: 2011 end-page: 242 article-title: The human heart: application of the golden ratio and angle publication-title: Int J Cardiol – volume: 2013 year: 2013 article-title: End‐systolic elastance and ventricular–arterial coupling reserve predict cardiac events in patients with negative stress echocardiography publication-title: Biomed Res Int – volume: 84 start-page: 304 year: 2016 end-page: 309 article-title: Ventricular–arterial coupling in severe aortic stenosis: relation with symptoms and heart failure publication-title: Arget J Cardiol TBC – volume: 289 start-page: H501 year: 2005 end-page: H512 article-title: Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure–volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers publication-title: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol – volume: 29 start-page: 447 year: 2011 end-page: 459 article-title: Ventricular–vascular interaction in heart failure publication-title: Cardiol Clin – volume: 41 start-page: 1249 year: 2020 end-page: 1257 article-title: Routinely reported ejection fraction and mortality in clinical practice: where does the nadir of risk lie? publication-title: Eur Heart J – volume: 86 start-page: 513 year: 1992 end-page: 521 article-title: Effective arterial elastance as index of arterial vascular load in humans publication-title: Circulation – volume: 40 start-page: 1431 year: 2002 end-page: 1436 article-title: Physiologic limits of left ventricular hypertrophy in elite junior athletes: relevance to differential diagnosis of athlete's heart and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 54 start-page: 595 year: 1984 end-page: 602 article-title: Effect of arterial impedance changes on the end‐systolic pressure–volume relation publication-title: Circ Res – volume: 198 start-page: 85 year: 2015 end-page: 86 article-title: Left ventricular diameters as a reflection of “extreme and mean ratio” publication-title: Int J Cardiol – volume: 21 start-page: 402 year: 2019 end-page: 424 article-title: The role of ventricular–arterial coupling in cardiac disease and heart failure: assessment, clinical implications and therapeutic interventions. A consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Aorta & Peripheral Vascular Diseases, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, and Heart Failure Association publication-title: Eur J Heart Fail – volume: 30 start-page: 1143 year: 2013 end-page: 1150 article-title: Age‐ and gender‐dependent left ventricular remodeling publication-title: Echocardiography – volume: 49 start-page: 972 year: 2007 end-page: 981 article-title: Ventricular structure and function in hypertensive participants with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction: the Cardiovascular Health Study publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 94 start-page: 2497 year: 1996 end-page: 2506 article-title: Single‐beat estimation of end‐systolic pressure–volume relation in humans. A new method with the potential for noninvasive application publication-title: Circulation – volume: 3 year: 2016 article-title: Importance of length and external diameter in left ventricular geometry. Normal values from the HUNT Study publication-title: Open Heart – volume: 21 start-page: 375 year: 2020 end-page: 377 article-title: Insights from physiology applied to interpretation of supranormal ejection fraction in women publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging – volume: 4 start-page: 23 year: 2008 end-page: 36 article-title: Ventricular–vascular interaction in heart failure publication-title: Heart Fail Clin – volume: 245 start-page: H773 year: 1983 end-page: H780 article-title: Left ventricular interaction with arterial load studied in isolated canine ventricle publication-title: Am J Physiol – volume: 10 start-page: 111 year: 1996 end-page: 116 article-title: Effects of aging on left ventricular–arterial coupling in man: assessment by means of arterial effective and left ventricular elastances publication-title: J Hum Hypertens – volume: 6 start-page: 647 year: 1985 end-page: 655 article-title: Range of normal values for left and right ventricular ejection fraction at rest and during exercise assessed by radionuclide angiocardiography publication-title: Eur Heart J – volume: 125 start-page: 1659 year: 1993 end-page: 1666 article-title: Left ventricular–arterial coupling relations in the normal human heart publication-title: Am Heart J – volume: 4 year: 2017 article-title: Cardiac mechanics and dysfunction with anthracyclines in the community: results from the PREDICT study publication-title: Open Heart – volume: 23 start-page: 659 year: 2017 end-page: 665 article-title: Measures of ventricular–arterial coupling and incident heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a matched case–control analysis publication-title: J Card Fail – volume: 255 start-page: 105 year: 2018 end-page: 110 article-title: Ejection fraction as related to basic components in the left and right ventricular volume domains publication-title: Int J Cardiol – volume: 7 start-page: 293 year: 2006 end-page: 297 article-title: What is a “normal” right ventricle? publication-title: Eur J Echocardiogr – volume: 16 start-page: 233 year: 2015 end-page: 270 article-title: Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging – volume: 62 start-page: 1165 year: 2013 end-page: 1172 article-title: Ventricular–arterial coupling, remodeling, and prognosis in chronic heart failure publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 32 start-page: 1221 year: 1998 end-page: 1227 article-title: Coupled systolic–ventricular and vascular stiffening with age: implications for pressure regulation and cardiac reserve in the elderly publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 103 start-page: 845 year: 2009 end-page: 851 article-title: Comparison of ventricular structure and function in Chinese patients with heart failure and ejection fractions >55% versus 40% to 55% versus <40% publication-title: Am J Cardiol – volume: 74 start-page: 172 year: 1991 end-page: 183 article-title: Ejection fraction revisited publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 105 start-page: 1342 year: 2008 end-page: 1351 article-title: Arterial‐ventricular coupling: mechanistic insights into cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise publication-title: J Appl Physiol (1985) – volume: 65 start-page: 483 year: 1989 end-page: 493 article-title: Ventriculoarterial coupling in normal and failing heart in humans publication-title: Circ Res – volume: 3 start-page: 12 year: 2017 end-page: 18 article-title: Ventricular–arterial coupling in chronic heart failure publication-title: Card Fail Rev – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.085 – volume: 84 start-page: 304 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 article-title: Ventricular–arterial coupling in severe aortic stenosis: relation with symptoms and heart failure publication-title: Arget J Cardiol TBC contributor: fullname: Migliore R – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.86.2.513 – ident: e_1_2_8_42_1 doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00374-X – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.10.2497 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01651-5 – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 doi: 10.1152/physiol.00056.2018 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1161/01.RES.65.2.483 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1155/2013/235194 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02270-2 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90756-Y – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1097/00000542-199101000-00026 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.094 – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.019 – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061916 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.061 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000524 – ident: e_1_2_8_41_1 doi: 10.15420/cfr.2017:4:2 – volume: 10 start-page: 111 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 article-title: Effects of aging on left ventricular–arterial coupling in man: assessment by means of arterial effective and left ventricular elastances publication-title: J Hum Hypertens contributor: fullname: Cohen‐Solal A – ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2007.10.001 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.06.004 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.050 – ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.041 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00138.2005 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00760.2011 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1436 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2005.06.010 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1111/echo.12264 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew142 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1983.245.5.H773 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000465 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.164 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.013 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1161/01.RES.54.5.595 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4351-2 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz550 – ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa018 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.07.395 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90600.2008 |
SSID | ssj0001561524 |
Score | 2.2514791 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used... The aim of this article was to analyse in-depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly used... Abstract The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly... Abstract The aim of this article was to analyse in‐depth the relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) and the most commonly... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed wiley |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 2214 |
SubjectTerms | Effective arterial elastance Ejection fraction Heart failure Left ventricle elastance Left ventricular ejection fraction Phi number Review Reviews Sepsis Ventricular–arterial coupling |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09b9swED0UGYIuRZP0Q01SsGinAmpMWiKlMQlsGAXcoWiAbARJkXWCQg5ce89_yD_ML8kdKRsyWiRLNkHiQPGJvHfiu0eAL0iBy6Z0MjeGi7xwSuYYhmTODa6WyIhrE886nP6Qk4vi-2V52TvqizRhyR44DdyJCJVXVRhIzwNVVVo3KGw1DN4p7qoiOYHyspdMdfXBGJiKjR-pOPGzIL7hYkz-j70IFI36_8cu_xVJ9slrjD7j1_Cqo43sNHV3D174dh92p93G-AFc_4xV4qRhZkjp2GKtcZtd3bBOi8X--LBkpG-MP_3MgvnrKMRqWVik-gZm2qbf4v72Lmo-8SNlbr6i6t3fb-BiPPp1Psm7YxRyV5J4U3hMqaytubB1VRmDoBVe1tyQNaAPGLoaZGkyOGNdY7k0VgVRu2agHOZSuCK-hZ123vr3wAamLIK0btg42jJVxnqOQZA3pjCi8jKDz-uh1TfJLUMnX2ShCQAdAcjgjEZ904IcruMNxF13uOuncM_gaI2Z7qbdX41cRaUcL4NPm8c4YWgXxLR-vqI2lEVh53kG7xLEm54gl63kkON7qC3wt7q6_aS9mkVTblVSoU2dwdf4mTzy-no0GYt49eE5BuIQXgr6BxAFhkews1ys_DESpaX9GOfEAz6BEzk priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NatwwEB7SFEovIf13mxaV9lRwd6W1JfsUkpJlKaSH0sDehCRL2YRgb53de9-hb9gn6Yxsb3Zpyc3YAkua0cyn0TcjgI8IgfMqdzI1hos0c0qm6IZkyg1aS0TEpYl3HZ5_k7OL7Os8n-_BbMiFIVrlYBOjoa4aRzHyEboh1cH3kbEUBXCr0fHyZ0r3R9E5a3-ZxgN4yAXCCtRsNVd30RaECbnINvVJxcgvgviMxpnqQW55pFi4_39o81_S5DaYjd5oeggHPYxkJ53cn8Cer5_Co_P-oPwZXH-PWePEaWYI8Vg7cN4WV0vWc7PYjQ8rRnzHGAQ0LfPXkZhVs9B2-Q7M1NV2iz-_fkcOKCotc82asnkvn8PF9OzHl1naX6uQupzInMLjFsvakgtbFoUxKMTMy5IbKhXoA7qyClGbDM5YV1kujVVBlK4aK4d7K7SQL2C_bmr_CtjY5FmQ1k0qR0eoyljP0SnyymRGFF4m8GGYWr3sqmfork6y0CQAHQWQwCnN-qYFVbyOL5r2UvcLSItQeFWEsfQ8UHatxT_aYhK8U9wVWZbA0SAz3S_DW32nNAm833zGBUSnIqb2zZra0K4KO88TeNmJeNMTxLaFnHAch9oR_k5Xd7_UV4tYpFvllHhTJvApqsk9w9dns6mIT6_vH8MbeCxotx-phEewv2rX_i1CopV9F7X9L-N5DhU priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Wiley Open Access dbid: 24P link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1di9QwFL0sK4gv4rfVVSL6JNSdZJqPgi8qOwzCiogL-xaSNNnZZeks3Zl3_4P_0F_ivWmns4Mi-FamGZr25uaem5x7AvAGIbBsZFClc1yUVdCqxDCkSu5wtkREXLt81uHxFzU_qT6fytM9eL-phen1IcYFN_KMPF-Tgzt_fbgVDY2LJN7h7GowYb-FuMbQmBbV1-0KC0IDmU-1FRMpS4l9GPVJxeH27zsRKQv3_w1t_kmavAlmczSa3YO7A4xkH3q734e92D6A28fDRvlDuPiWq8aJ08wQ4rFuw3lbnF-xgZvFLmNaMeI75kVA17F4kYlZLUtdX-_AXNvcbPHrx8_MAcVBy8JyTdW8Z4_gZHb0_dO8HI5VKIMkMqeImGJ5X3Pha2OcQyNWUdXckVRgTBjKGkRtKgXnQ-O5cl4nUYdmogPmVjhDPob9dtnGp8AmTlZJ-TBtAm2haucjx6DIG1c5YaIq4PXm09qrXj3D9jrJwpIBbDZAAR_pq48tSPE6_7DszuzgQFYkE7VJExV5oupaj0_0Zppi0DyYqirgYGMzO7jhtUXsovucr4BX4210INoVcW1crqkNZVXYeV7Ak97EY08Q2xo15fgeesf4O13dvdOeL7JIt5ZUeFMX8DYPk3-8vj2az0S-evY_jZ_DHUG5fyYWHsD-qlvHFwiQVv5l9oPf_iQM4w priority: 102 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
Title | Revisiting the relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular–arterial coupling |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fehf2.12880 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686316 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2447030114/abstract/ https://search.proquest.com/docview/2425592471 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7524249 https://doaj.org/article/2f8e78f06e1f4588bc04b83fec71c844 |
Volume | 7 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NitswEB42Wyi9lP6v221QaU8FJ5FsS_KxuySEQpawdCE3I8nSJsuuE9zk3nfoG_ZJOpLtkNDSQy_GWALJmpHmG-mbEcAnhMBZmRkeK0VZnBrBYzRDPKYKV0tExLkKdx3Orvj0Jv26yBYnkHWxMIG0b_RqUN0_DKrVMnArNw9m2PHEhvPZpch8UEM-7EFPJMmBi96GBqNNSvepSNnQLh0b4Dos_bVvCFckT_z15gd2KKTr_xvG_JMqeQhhgw2aPIOnLXgkX5pOPocTW72Ax7P2ePwl3F2HWHHPZCYI7EjdMd2Wqw1pGVnk3rot8SzHsPWnamLvAh2rIq5uohyIqsrDGr9-_AzMT1RVYtY7H8N7-wpuJuNvl9O4vUwhNpmncDKLjpXWOWU6l1IpFF1qeU6VTxBoHRqwErEad0ZpU2rKlRaO5aYcCYMeFa6Lr-G0Wlf2DMhIZanj2iSl8QenQmlL0RTSUqWKScsj-NgNbbFpcmYUTXZkVnhZFEEWEVz4Ud_X8Hmuw4d1fVu00i6Yk1ZIN-KWOh9Tq7FFLRNnjaBGpmkE553MinbyfS8QsYjG04vgw74Yp40_C1GVXe98He9LYedpBG8aEe970qlIBOJI-EddPS5BTQ2puVvNjOBzUJN__H4xnk5YeHv73828gyfMu_-BW3gOp9t6Z98jRtrqPvRYOsenWIg-PLoYX82v-2G_oR9my2_RnRfG |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,11589,12083,21416,27957,27958,31754,31755,33779,33780,43345,43840,46087,46511,50849,50958,53827,53829,74102,74659 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1fb9MwED9BJwEvE39HxgAjeEIKq13HSZ4QQ60KrBWaNmlvlu3Y6yaUlKx95zvwDfkknB23awXaW5RYiu2z7353_t0Z4B1C4KzKjEiVoizlJhcpmiGRUoXaEhFxqcJdh5OpGJ_xr-fZeQy4XUda5UonBkVdNcbHyA_RDOUdfP84_5n6W6P86Wq8QuMu7PABuio92DkaTr-f3ERZEB5kjK_rkrJDO3PsAyplXwdywxKFgv3_Q5n_kiU3QWywQqOHsBvhI_nUyfsR3LH1Y7g3iQfkT-DqJGSLey4zQWhH2hXXbXY5J5GTRX5YtyCe5xiCf6ol9ioQsmri2i7Pgai62mzx59fvwP3ExUpMs_RZvBdP4Ww0PP08TuN1CqnJPImTWXSttC4p02VRKIXC41aUVPkSgdahCasQrQlnlDaVpkLp3LHSVP3coE-FmvEZ9Oqmts-B9FXGndBmUBl_dJorbSkaQ1oprlhhRQJvV1Mr513VDNnVR2bSC0AGASRw5Gd93cJXug4vmvZCxo0jmStsXri-sNT5rFqNf9TFwFmTU1NwnsDBSmYybr9rebNYEniz_owbx5-GqNo2S9_Ge1PYeZrAXifidU8Q0xZiQHEc-Zbwt7q6_aW-nIXi3HnmE27KBN6HZXLL8OVwPGLhaf_2MbyG--PTybE8_jL99gIeMO_xBzrhAfQW7dK-RFi00K_i2v8LgWwOrg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwEB5BkSouiHdTChjBCSns2pvYyQnx6Gp5tEKISnuLbMfutkLJNt298x_4h_wSZhzvdleg3qLEUmzPeOaz_c0MwCuEwHmdW5lqzUWaWSVTdEMy5RqtJSLiUodah0fHcnKSfZ7m08h_uoy0ypVNDIa6bi2dkQ_QDakevg98pEV8-zh-O79IqYIU3bTGcho34RZ6ySFVM1BTdXXegkAhF9k6Q6kYuJkXb9A8U0bIDZ8UUvf_D2_-S5vchLPBH43vwp0IJNm7XvL34IZr7sPuUbwqfwDn30PcOLGaGYI81q1Yb7OzOYvsLPbT-QUjxmM4BtQdc-eBmtUw3_URD0w39WaLP79-BxYoqi2z7ZLieU8fwsn48MeHSRoLK6Q2JzqncLjJMqbkwpRFoTWKMXOy5JqSBTqPzqxG3Ca91cbWhkttlBelrYfK4u4KbeQj2Gnaxu0BG-o889LYUW3pElVp4zi6RV7rTIvCyQRerqa2mvf5M6o-U7KoSABVEEAC72nW1y0o53V40XanVVxClfCFU4UfSsc9xdca_KMpRt5ZxW2RZQkcrGRWxYV4WV2pTQIv1p9xCdG9iG5cu6Q2tK_CzvMEHvciXvcE0W0hRxzHobaEv9XV7S_N2Syk6VY5hd6UCbwOanLN8KvDyViEp_3rx_AcdlHpq6-fjr88gduCtv6BV3gAO4tu6Z4iPlqYZ0Hx_wJfixF0 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting+the+relationship+between+left+ventricular+ejection+fraction+and+ventricular-arterial+coupling&rft.jtitle=ESC+Heart+Failure&rft.au=Mihaileanu%2C+Serban&rft.au=Antohi%2C+Elena-Laura&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.eissn=2055-5822&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fehf2.12880&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32686316&rft.externalDocID=32686316 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2055-5822&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2055-5822&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2055-5822&client=summon |