Retrieval of rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) oocytes by ultrasound-guided needle aspiration: Problems and solutions

Oocytes of nonhuman primates such as rhesus monkeys are excellent models for diverse studies on developmental biology, epigenetics, human reproduction, and assisted reproductive technologies, as well as on transgenics. Such studies require numerous oocytes that can be retrieved after controlled ovar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular reproduction and development Vol. 76; no. 9; pp. 890 - 896
Main Authors Rodriguez, Nancy A., Si, Wei, Emmi, Adelina M., Layman, Lawrence C., Eroglu, Ali
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.09.2009
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Oocytes of nonhuman primates such as rhesus monkeys are excellent models for diverse studies on developmental biology, epigenetics, human reproduction, and assisted reproductive technologies, as well as on transgenics. Such studies require numerous oocytes that can be retrieved after controlled ovarian stimulation. Currently, most primate centers use laparoscopic aspiration or laparotomy followed by aspiration to collect rhesus oocytes, although the ultrasound‐guided needle aspiration is more advantageous due to reduced infection risk, less injury, and a shorter recovery period. Yet, some initial difficulties associated with the ultrasound‐guided needle aspiration limit its broader application. The objective of the present study was to address these obstacles. By presenting practical solutions to the initial difficulties, results from our study show that it is possible to collect a mean number of 38 ± 10 rhesus oocytes per hormonally stimulated female. These results compare favorably to the average number of rhesus oocytes collected using the laparoscopic approach and suggest that when initial obstacles are overcome, the ultrasound‐guided oocyte retrieval represents a good alternative to more invasive approaches. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 76: 890–896, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:MRD21060
ark:/67375/WNG-6B975288-4
istex:38BCE803059234F511167BCE80B3E651D6FBF295
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1040-452X
1098-2795
DOI:10.1002/mrd.21060