Indirect functional connectivity does not predict overall survival in glioblastoma

Lesion network mapping (LNM) is a popular framework to assess clinical syndromes following brain injury. The classical approach involves embedding lesions from patients into a normative functional connectome and using the corresponding functional maps as proxies for disconnections. However, previous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurobiology of disease Vol. 196; p. 106521
Main Authors Pini, Lorenzo, Lombardi, Giuseppe, Sansone, Giulio, Gaiola, Matteo, Padovan, Marta, Volpin, Francesco, Denaro, Luca, Corbetta, Maurizio, Salvalaggio, Alessandro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.06.2024
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Lesion network mapping (LNM) is a popular framework to assess clinical syndromes following brain injury. The classical approach involves embedding lesions from patients into a normative functional connectome and using the corresponding functional maps as proxies for disconnections. However, previous studies indicated limited predictive power of this approach in behavioral deficits. We hypothesized similarly low predictiveness for overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma (GBM). A retrospective dataset of patients with GBM was included (n = 99). Lesion masks were registered in the normative space to compute disconnectivity maps. The brain functional normative connectome consisted in data from 173 healthy subjects obtained from the Human Connectome Project. A modified version of the LNM was then applied to core regions of GBM masks. Linear regression, classification, and principal component (PCA) analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between disconnectivity and OS. OS was considered both as continuous and categorical (low, intermediate, and high survival) variable. The results revealed no significant associations between OS and network disconnection strength when analyzed at both voxel-wise and classification levels. Moreover, patients stratified into different OS groups did not exhibit significant differences in network connectivity patterns. The spatial similarity among the first PCA of network maps for each OS group suggested a lack of distinctive network patterns associated with survival duration. Compared with indirect structural measures, functional indirect mapping does not provide significant predictive power for OS in patients with GBM. These findings are consistent with previous research that demonstrated the limitations of indirect functional measures in predicting clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for more comprehensive methodologies and a deeper understanding of the factors influencing clinical outcomes in this challenging disease. [Display omitted] •This study challenges the predictive power of network mapping in glioblastoma.•We found a lack of distinctive functional network patterns associated with survival.•The clinical value of indirect brain functional tools needs further investigation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0969-9961
1095-953X
1095-953X
DOI:10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106521