Ensemble prediction of air quality using the WRF/CMAQ model system for health effect studies in China
Accurate exposure estimates are required for health effect analyses of severe air pollution in China. Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used to provide spatial distribution, chemical composition, particle size fractions, and source origins of air pollutants. The accuracy of air quality pre...
Saved in:
Published in | Atmospheric chemistry and physics Vol. 17; no. 21; pp. 13103 - 13118 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
07.11.2017
Copernicus Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Accurate exposure estimates are required for health effect analyses of severe air pollution in China. Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used to provide spatial distribution, chemical composition, particle size fractions, and source origins of air pollutants. The accuracy of air quality predictions in China is greatly affected by the uncertainties of emission inventories. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model with meteorological inputs from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were used in this study to simulate air pollutants in China in 2013. Four simulations were conducted with four different anthropogenic emission inventories, including the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC), the Emission Inventory for China by School of Environment at Tsinghua University (SOE), the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), and the Regional Emission inventory in Asia version 2 (REAS2). Model performance of each simulation was evaluated against available observation data from 422 sites in 60 cities across China. Model predictions of O3 and PM2.5 generally meet the model performance criteria, but performance differences exist in different regions, for different pollutants, and among inventories. Ensemble predictions were calculated by linearly combining the results from different inventories to minimize the sum of the squared errors between the ensemble results and the observations in all cities. The ensemble concentrations show improved agreement with observations in most cities. The mean fractional bias (MFB) and mean fractional errors (MFEs) of the ensemble annual PM2.5 in the 60 cities are −0.11 and 0.24, respectively, which are better than the MFB (−0.25 to −0.16) and MFE (0.26–0.31) of individual simulations. The ensemble annual daily maximum 1 h O3 (O3-1h) concentrations are also improved, with mean normalized bias (MNB) of 0.03 and mean normalized errors (MNE) of 0.14, compared to MNB of 0.06–0.19 and MNE of 0.16–0.22 of the individual predictions. The ensemble predictions agree better with observations with daily, monthly, and annual averaging times in all regions of China for both PM2.5 and O3-1h. The study demonstrates that ensemble predictions from combining predictions from individual emission inventories can improve the accuracy of predicted temporal and spatial distributions of air pollutants. This study is the first ensemble model study in China using multiple emission inventories, and the results are publicly available for future health effect studies. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Accurate exposure estimates are required for health effect analyses of severe air pollution in China. Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used to provide spatial distribution, chemical composition, particle size fractions, and source origins of air pollutants. The accuracy of air quality predictions in China is greatly affected by the uncertainties of emission inventories. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model with meteorological inputs from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were used in this study to simulate air pollutants in China in 2013. Four simulations were conducted with four different anthropogenic emission inventories, including the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC), the Emission Inventory for China by School of Environment at Tsinghua University (SOE), the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), and the Regional Emission inventory in Asia version 2 (REAS2). Model performance of each simulation was evaluated against available observation data from 422 sites in 60 cities across China. Model predictions of O3 and PM2.5 generally meet the model performance criteria, but performance differences exist in different regions, for different pollutants, and among inventories. Ensemble predictions were calculated by linearly combining the results from different inventories to minimize the sum of the squared errors between the ensemble results and the observations in all cities. The ensemble concentrations show improved agreement with observations in most cities. The mean fractional bias (MFB) and mean fractional errors (MFEs) of the ensemble annual PM2.5 in the 60 cities are −0.11 and 0.24, respectively, which are better than the MFB (−0.25 to −0.16) and MFE (0.26–0.31) of individual simulations. The ensemble annual daily maximum 1 h O3 (O3-1h) concentrations are also improved, with mean normalized bias (MNB) of 0.03 and mean normalized errors (MNE) of 0.14, compared to MNB of 0.06–0.19 and MNE of 0.16–0.22 of the individual predictions. The ensemble predictions agree better with observations with daily, monthly, and annual averaging times in all regions of China for both PM2.5 and O3-1h. The study demonstrates that ensemble predictions from combining predictions from individual emission inventories can improve the accuracy of predicted temporal and spatial distributions of air pollutants. This study is the first ensemble model study in China using multiple emission inventories, and the results are publicly available for future health effect studies. Accurate exposure estimates are required for health effect analyses of severe air pollution in China. Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used to provide spatial distribution, chemical composition, particle size fractions, and source origins of air pollutants. The accuracy of air quality predictions in China is greatly affected by the uncertainties of emission inventories. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model with meteorological inputs from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were used in this study to simulate air pollutants in China in 2013. Four simulations were conducted with four different anthropogenic emission inventories, including the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC), the Emission Inventory for China by School of Environment at Tsinghua University (SOE), the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), and the Regional Emission inventory in Asia version 2 (REAS2). Model performance of each simulation was evaluated against available observation data from 422 sites in 60 cities across China. Model predictions of O3 and PM2.5 generally meet the model performance criteria, but performance differences exist in different regions, for different pollutants, and among inventories. Ensemble predictions were calculated by linearly combining the results from different inventories to minimize the sum of the squared errors between the ensemble results and the observations in all cities. The ensemble concentrations show improved agreement with observations in most cities. The mean fractional bias (MFB) and mean fractional errors (MFEs) of the ensemble annual PM2.5 in the 60 cities are -0.11 and 0.24, respectively, which are better than the MFB (-0.25 to -0.16) and MFE (0.26–0.31) of individual simulations. The ensemble annual daily maximum 1 h O3 (O3-1h) concentrations are also improved, with mean normalized bias (MNB) of 0.03 and mean normalized errors (MNE) of 0.14, compared to MNB of 0.06–0.19 and MNE of 0.16–0.22 of the individual predictions. The ensemble predictions agree better with observations with daily, monthly, and annual averaging times in all regions of China for both PM2.5 and O3-1h. The study demonstrates that ensemble predictions from combining predictions from individual emission inventories can improve the accuracy of predicted temporal and spatial distributions of air pollutants. This study is the first ensemble model study in China using multiple emission inventories, and the results are publicly available for future health effect studies. Accurate exposure estimates are required for health effect analyses of severe air pollution in China. Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used to provide spatial distribution, chemical composition, particle size fractions, and source origins of air pollutants. The accuracy of air quality predictions in China is greatly affected by the uncertainties of emission inventories. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model with meteorological inputs from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were used in this study to simulate air pollutants in China in 2013. Four simulations were conducted with four different anthropogenic emission inventories, including the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC), the Emission Inventory for China by School of Environment at Tsinghua University (SOE), the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), and the Regional Emission inventory in Asia version 2 (REAS2). Model performance of each simulation was evaluated against available observation data from 422 sites in 60 cities across China. Model predictions of O3 and PM2.5 generally meet the model performance criteria, but performance differences exist in different regions, for different pollutants, and among inventories. Ensemble predictions were calculated by linearly combining the results from different inventories to minimize the sum of the squared errors between the ensemble results and the observations in all cities. The ensemble concentrations show improved agreement with observations in most cities. The mean fractional bias (MFB) and mean fractional errors (MFEs) of the ensemble annual PM2.5 in the 60 cities are −0.11 and 0.24, respectively, which are better than the MFB (−0.25 to −0.16) and MFE (0.26–0.31) of individual simulations. The ensemble annual daily maximum 1 h O3 (O3-1h) concentrations are also improved, with mean normalized bias (MNB) of 0.03 and mean normalized errors (MNE) of 0.14, compared to MNB of 0.06–0.19 and MNE of 0.16–0.22 of the individual predictions. The ensemble predictions agree better with observations with daily, monthly, and annual averaging times in all regions of China for both PM2.5 and O3-1h. The study demonstrates that ensemble predictions from combining predictions from individual emission inventories can improve the accuracy of predicted temporal and spatial distributions of air pollutants. This study is the first ensemble model study in China using multiple emission inventories, and the results are publicly available for future health effect studies. Accurate exposure estimates are required for health effect analyses of severe air pollution in China. Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used to provide spatial distribution, chemical composition, particle size fractions, and source origins of air pollutants. The accuracy of air quality predictions in China is greatly affected by the uncertainties of emission inventories. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model with meteorological inputs from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were used in this study to simulate air pollutants in China in 2013. Four simulations were conducted with four different anthropogenic emission inventories, including the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC), the Emission Inventory for China by School of Environment at Tsinghua University (SOE), the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), and the Regional Emission inventory in Asia version 2 (REAS2). Model performance of each simulation was evaluated against available observation data from 422 sites in 60 cities across China. Model predictions of O.sub.3 and PM.sub.2.5 generally meet the model performance criteria, but performance differences exist in different regions, for different pollutants, and among inventories. Ensemble predictions were calculated by linearly combining the results from different inventories to minimize the sum of the squared errors between the ensemble results and the observations in all cities. The ensemble concentrations show improved agreement with observations in most cities. The mean fractional bias (MFB) and mean fractional errors (MFEs) of the ensemble annual PM.sub.2.5 in the 60 cities are -0.11 and 0.24, respectively, which are better than the MFB (-0.25 to -0.16) and MFE (0.26-0.31) of individual simulations. The ensemble annual daily maximum 1 h O.sub.3 (O.sub.3 -1h) concentrations are also improved, with mean normalized bias (MNB) of 0.03 and mean normalized errors (MNE) of 0.14, compared to MNB of 0.06-0.19 and MNE of 0.16-0.22 of the individual predictions. The ensemble predictions agree better with observations with daily, monthly, and annual averaging times in all regions of China for both PM.sub.2.5 and O.sub.3 -1h. The study demonstrates that ensemble predictions from combining predictions from individual emission inventories can improve the accuracy of predicted temporal and spatial distributions of air pollutants. This study is the first ensemble model study in China using multiple emission inventories, and the results are publicly available for future health effect studies. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Zhang, Hongliang Li, Xun Hu, Jianlin Zhang, Qiang Huang, Lin Zhao, Bin Ying, Qi Wang, Shuxiao |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Hu, Jianlin – sequence: 2 fullname: Li, Xun – sequence: 3 fullname: Huang, Lin – sequence: 4 fullname: Ying, Qi – sequence: 5 fullname: Zhang, Qiang – sequence: 6 fullname: Zhao, Bin – sequence: 7 fullname: Wang, Shuxiao – sequence: 8 fullname: Zhang, Hongliang |
BookMark | eNp9kk1rGzEQhpeSQpM0P6A3QU89bKLZ1X7oaEzSGlJKk0COQh8jW2Z35UhaiP99lbg0NZSig8TwzPsOo_esOJn8hEXxCehlA5xdSb0roSuhBlqXFYXuXXEKbU_Lrq7YyV_vD8VZjFtKq4YCOy3weoo4qgHJLqBxOjk_EW-JdIE8zXJwaU_m6KY1SRskj3c3V8vvi59k9AYHEvcx4UisD2SDckgbgtaiTiSm2TiMxE1kuXGT_Fi8t3KIePH7Pi8ebq4flt_K2x9fV8vFbakbgFRa5D2aTjKloLe9RmY7hayue94abWteI5e0b_tOK60bpoBaQy1vlKy0MvV5sTrIGi-3YhfcKMNeeOnEa8GHtZAhOT2gkHlP2alTqgXWW87RVNnb8FbZbKSz1ueD1i74pxljEls_hylPLyoGrKIN67r_UcDbPCoD6N-otczWbrI-BalHF7VYNFC3nEFfZeryH1Q-Bken83dbl-tHDV-OGjKT8Dmt5RyjWN3fHbNwYHXwMQa0f9YDVLwkSOQECejEa4LES4LqX7JOuOw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2022_114196 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_22_4615_2022 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_21_2725_2021 crossref_primary_10_5194_gmd_15_7791_2022 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41370_024_00658_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_155231 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10546_019_00483_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2023_120116 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2021_116793 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2022_119446 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2023_120231 crossref_primary_10_1029_2022JD038360 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_172606 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_uclim_2022_101185 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2022_120926 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos13040538 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_21_6365_2021 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsta_2019_0325 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2021_106482 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_135620 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11869_021_01023_9 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_19_5905_2019 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11427_021_2098_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2023_120269 crossref_primary_10_1029_2022JD038373 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43856_024_00557_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2020_118087 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apr_2021_101211 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_10_174 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_136801 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_20_7531_2020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2020_105927 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2021_105620 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2024_141548 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_19_8339_2019 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_021_21305_1 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2022_872249 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos11070733 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2023_123183 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2023_107861 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_0c02958 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2020_118131 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oneear_2023_04_006 crossref_primary_10_1029_2021GL093668 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_19_12413_2019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2021_112498 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jes_2021_08_048 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos14020393 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2023_108200 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115480 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos12080983 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2023_116326 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jes_2023_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40808_024_02086_0 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_0c05815 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2020_118022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jes_2022_07_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_144796 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_1c01567 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2020_117896 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijheh_2021_113912 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_151459 |
Cites_doi | 10.1021/es404810z 10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.034 10.1029/2002JD003093 10.1021/acs.est.7b03193 10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.021 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.034 10.5194/acp-13-11019-2013 10.1289/ehp.1510133 10.1021/es201656f 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.037 10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016 10.1115/1.2128636 10.1098/rsta.2007.2076 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.052 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.011 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.165 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.056 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.012 10.5194/acp-14-9787-2014 10.5194/acp-11-2295-2011 10.5194/acp-11-4105-2011 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.062 10.5194/acp-12-4429-2012 10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012 10.5194/acp-17-5379-2017 10.5194/acp-17-6393-2017 10.1021/acs.est.5b02514 10.1021/es404809j 10.1289/ehp.1408565 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.012 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.011 10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.016 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.054 10.5194/acp-14-5617-2014 10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024031 10.1021/es502965b 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087 10.5194/acp-11-931-2011 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.019 10.5194/acp-10-3273-2010 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.020 10.5194/acp-12-481-2012 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.10.038 10.1038/nature15371 10.1038/nature02771 10.1029/2004JD004718 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.054 10.5194/acp-15-3445-2015 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.060 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.108 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.014 10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011 10.1073/pnas.1404727111 10.5194/acp-17-77-2017 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.267 10.1038/srep14884 10.1021/acs.est.5b03709 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2017 Copernicus GmbH Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2017 2017. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2017 Copernicus GmbH – notice: Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2017 – notice: 2017. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION ISR 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD 8FE 8FG ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W GNUQQ H8D H96 HCIFZ KL. L.G L7M P5Z P62 PATMY PCBAR PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PYCSY DOA |
DOI | 10.5194/acp-17-13103-2017 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Gale In Context: Science Aqualine Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central Continental Europe Database Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts ProQuest Central Student Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Collection Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central Aerospace Database Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Technology Collection Continental Europe Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Aqualine Environmental Science Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Meteorology & Climatology Public Health |
EISSN | 1680-7324 |
EndPage | 13118 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_a103d7a7bb6148f99ed28edd96bff39c A513694182 10_5194_acp_17_13103_2017 |
GeographicLocations | China Asia |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China – name: Asia |
GroupedDBID | 23N 2WC 3V. 4P2 5GY 5VS 6J9 7XC 8FE 8FG 8FH 8R4 8R5 AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG ACGFO ADBBV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHGZY AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARAPS ATCPS BBORY BCNDV BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION D1K E3Z EBS EDH EJD FD6 GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HCIFZ HH5 IAO IEA IPNFZ ISR ITC K6- KQ8 M~E OK1 P2P P62 PATMY PCBAR PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PYCSY Q2X RIG RKB RNS TR2 XSB ~02 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD AZQEC C1K DWQXO F1W GNUQQ H8D H96 KL. L.G L7M PQEST PQUKI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-fe98ed7a4bb18f8ce4f7be433896dcf393e9a08687cbcc54b10fd0f95ba2cbd3 |
IEDL.DBID | 8FG |
ISSN | 1680-7324 1680-7316 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 04 21:11:42 EDT 2024 Mon Oct 07 13:01:31 EDT 2024 Fri Sep 13 02:17:08 EDT 2024 Thu Feb 22 23:47:46 EST 2024 Wed Oct 25 09:15:20 EDT 2023 Thu Aug 01 20:00:09 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 00:58:31 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 21 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c511t-fe98ed7a4bb18f8ce4f7be433896dcf393e9a08687cbcc54b10fd0f95ba2cbd3 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7709-439X 0000-0002-1797-2311 0000-0001-8438-9188 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1960864118/abstract/?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PQID | 1960864118 |
PQPubID | 105744 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a103d7a7bb6148f99ed28edd96bff39c proquest_journals_2414205477 proquest_journals_1960864118 gale_infotracmisc_A513694182 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A513694182 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A513694182 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_17_13103_2017 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-11-07 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-11-07 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2017 text: 2017-11-07 day: 07 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationTitle | Atmospheric chemistry and physics |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Copernicus GmbH Copernicus Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: Copernicus GmbH – name: Copernicus Publications |
References | ref13 ref57 ref12 ref56 ref15 ref59 ref14 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref11 ref55 ref10 ref54 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref39 ref38 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref64 ref63 ref22 ref21 ref65 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref60 ref62 ref61 |
References_xml | – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1021/es404810z – ident: ref5 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.034 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1029/2002JD003093 – ident: ref43 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03193 – ident: ref56 doi: 10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009 – ident: ref62 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.021 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.034 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.5194/acp-13-11019-2013 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1289/ehp.1510133 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1021/es201656f – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.037 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1115/1.2128636 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2007.2076 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.052 – ident: ref6 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.011 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.165 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.056 – ident: ref61 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.012 – ident: ref64 doi: 10.5194/acp-14-9787-2014 – ident: ref63 doi: 10.5194/acp-11-2295-2011 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.5194/acp-11-4105-2011 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.062 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.5194/acp-12-4429-2012 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.5194/acp-17-5379-2017 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.5194/acp-17-6393-2017 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02514 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1021/es404809j – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408565 – ident: ref55 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.012 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.011 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.016 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.054 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.5194/acp-14-5617-2014 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014 – ident: ref60 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024031 – ident: ref7 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1021/es502965b – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.5194/acp-11-931-2011 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.019 – ident: ref32 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.5194/acp-10-3273-2010 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.020 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.5194/acp-12-481-2012 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.10.038 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1038/nature15371 – ident: ref38 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1038/nature02771 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.1029/2004JD004718 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.054 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.5194/acp-15-3445-2015 – ident: ref65 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.060 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.108 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.014 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404727111 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.5194/acp-17-77-2017 – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.267 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.1038/srep14884 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03709 |
SSID | ssj0025014 |
Score | 2.52866 |
Snippet | Accurate exposure estimates are required for health effect analyses of severe air pollution in China. Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used to... |
SourceID | doaj proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 13103 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy Air pollution Air pollution effects Air quality Air quality models Analysis Anthropogenic factors Atmospheric models Atmospheric research Bias Chemical composition Chemical pollution Chemical transport Cities Composition Computer simulation Emission analysis Emission inventories Emissions Errors Health Health aspects Industrial plant emissions Numerical weather prediction Outdoor air quality Particle size distribution Particulate matter Pollutants Pollution dispersion Pollution effects Predictions Public health Regions Simulation Spatial distribution Studies Weather forecasting |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Li9RAEG5kT17EJ0ZXKUQUhDBJupNOH8dhh1VYwXXFvTX9XAZ2M8Nk9uC_t6o7ow4oXjwmqUPyVT--Sld9xdhrz3vf8oaXrqldKWqLU4oLWQrcij2VOnKb1D4_dadfxcfL9vK3Vl-UE5blgTNwM1NX3EsjrSXJyqhU8E0fvFedjZErl1bfut0HU1OoRadlFGp1fVVSb6Z8nolsRcyM25S4MtfUYAvHSOpU9mtHSsL9f1ue056zvM_uTWQR5vklH7A7YXjIijPkuett-h0Ob2BxvULSma4esXAyjOHGXgfYbOkEhlCHdQSz2kIun_wOlOl-Bcj74Nv5crY4m3-G1A4HsqgzIIuFXB0JOdkDxpxrCKsBUrvtx-xieXKxOC2nRgqlQz61K2NQCJk0wtq6j70LIkobBEanqvMOUeRBGYxteumsc62wdRV9FVVrTeOs50_Y0bAewlMGTYNOEJZb4SohfVCx73nXopVUwfBYsHd7LPUmy2VoDDMIeI3A61rqBLwm4Av2ntD-aUhK1-kG-l9P_tf_8n_BXpGvNGlZDJQsc2Vux1F_-HKu523NqU63bwr2djKK693WODPVHuBHkfzVgeXxgSVONnf4eD8k9DTZR42LGIInMFT742PkSKJBZizls__xwc_ZXQIv1UPKY3a0296GF0iMdvZlmgM_AEUICRo priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Ensemble prediction of air quality using the WRF/CMAQ model system for health effect studies in China |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1960864118/abstract/ https://www.proquest.com/docview/2414205477/abstract/ https://doaj.org/article/a103d7a7bb6148f99ed28edd96bff39c |
Volume | 17 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9swEBdd-7KXsU-WrQtijA0GxrElW_bTSEO8bJCyZh3tm9BnCHR2ZqcP--93JzstgW1PxvYZrNNJ-p109ztC3llW2IylLDJpYiKeaBhSjIuIw1JsMdWR6cD2eZ4vfvCv19n1EVnsc2EwrHI_J4aJ2jYG98hjsBRA3xzwcKw07gKYXfxp-yvC-lF4zjoU03hAThLkxMOc8erzneuFp2foeuXFJMJaTf35JqAXHiuzjWCmTrDgFthMqFx2v0IFIv9_TddhDaoek0cDeKTTvrefkCNXPyWjJeDepg3b4_Q9nd1sAISGu2fEzevO_dQ3jm5bPJHBXqCNp2rT0j6d8jfFyPc1BRxIr1ZVPFtOL2goj0N7kmcKqJb22ZK0D_6gXR97SDc1DeW3n5PLan45W0RDYYXIAL7aRd6VhbNCca2TwhfGcS-04-Ctlrk1npXMlQq0XQijjcm4TibeTnyZaZUabdkLclw3tXtJaJqCO8U109xMuLCu9EXB8gykROkU8yPyca9Lue3pMyS4Hah4CYqXiZBB8RIVPyJnqO07QWS-Dg-adi2HgSQVSMOvC62RwtSXpbMpNMaWufbw52ZE3mJfSeS2qDF4Zq1uu05--b6S0yxhmLdbpCPyYRDyDZqSGnIRoFFIh3UgeXogCYPPHL7em4QcBn8n7031r68BM_EUkLIQr_7_9WvyENUSMh_FKTnetbfuDUCgnR4H6x6Tk7P5-bcVXqvlxdU4bCj8AQFPBzA |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,870,2115,12792,21416,27957,27958,33408,33779,43635,43840,74392,74659 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1bb9MwFLZgPMAL4ioyBlgIgYQUtYmdOH5CpVrpYJ3EKGJvlq9VpZGUpHvg33OOk26qBDwmOZHsz8f2d-xzIeSNY5UrWM5Sm2c25ZmBKcW4SDlsxQ5DHZmJ2T7Pyvl3_vmiuBgO3LrBrXK3JsaF2jUWz8hHoCnAvjnw4Q-bXylWjcLb1aGExm1yhzPYOjFSfPbp2uDCOzM0uMpqnGKFpv5WEzgLH2m7SWF9zrDMFmhKrFd2sy_F9P3_WqTjzjN7QO4PlJFO-jF-SG75-hFJFsB2mzYeitO3dHq5BuoZnx4Tf1x3_qe59HTT4j0MYk-bQPW6pX0Q5W-K_u4rCuyP_jifjaaLyVcai-LQPrUzBS5L-xhJ2rt80K73OKTrmsai20_Icna8nM7ToZxCaoFVbdPgZeWd0NyYrAqV9TwI4znYqLJ0NjDJvNSAcSWssbbgJhsHNw6yMDq3xrGn5KBuav-M0DwHI4obZrgdc-G8DFXFygKkhPSahYS832GpNn3SDAXGBgKvAHiVCRWBVwh8Qj4i2teCmO86vmjalRqmj9IgDU0XxmDi0iCldzl0xsnSBGi5TchrHCuFGS1qdJlZ6auuUyffztWkyBhG61Z5Qt4NQqHZttrqIQIBOoVJsPYkj_YkYcrZ_c87lVDDlO_UjYL-9TMwJZ4DPxbi8P9_vyJ358vFqTo9OfvynNxDiGLsozgiB9v2yr8AErQ1L6Om_wFbbAIv |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELdgkxAvaHyJwgALIZCQojaxEydPqCutNmDVKEPszfJnVWkkXdI98N9z57ibKgGPSS6SfT6ff-f7IuStZaXNWcYSk6Um4amGLcW4SDgcxRZTHZkO1T7nxfEP_vkiv4jxT10Mq9zqxKCobWPwjnwIkgLomwMeHvoYFnH2afZxfZVgByn0tMZ2GnfJvuBFDhK-fzSdny1uzC_0oKH5VZSjBPs19T5OQDB8qMw6AW2dYtMtkJvQvez2lArF_P-lssM5NDsgDyKApON-xR-SO65-RAangH2bNlyR03d0crkCIBqeHhM3rTv3S186um7RK4MrQRtP1aqlfUrlb4rR70sKWJD-XMyGk9PxNxpa5NC-0DMFZEv7jEnaB4DQro8_pKuahhbcT8j5bHo-OU5ic4XEAMbaJN5VpbNCca3T0pfGcS-042CxVoU1nlXMVQo4Xgqjjcm5TkfejnyVa5UZbdlTslc3tXtGaJaBScU109yMuLCu8mXJihyoROUU8wPyYctLue5LaEgwPZDxEhgvUyED4yUyfkCOkNs3hFj9Orxo2qWMm0kqoIahC62xjKmvKmczmIytCu1h5GZA3uBaSaxvUaOkLNV118mT7ws5zlOGubtlNiDvI5FvNq0yKuYjwKSwJNYO5eEOJWxAs_t5KxIyKoBO3orrXz8DbuIZoGUhnv__79fkHoi5_Hoy__KC3EcOhURIcUj2Nu21ewmIaKNfRVH_AxG1B9I |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ensemble+prediction+of+air+quality+using+the+WRF%2FCMAQ+model+system+for+health+effect+studies+in+China&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric+chemistry+and+physics&rft.au=Hu%2C+Jianlin&rft.au=Li%2C+Xun&rft.au=Huang%2C+Lin&rft.au=Qi%2C+Ying&rft.date=2017-11-07&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1680-7316&rft.eissn=1680-7324&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=13103&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Facp-17-13103-2017&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |