A novel diagnostic nomogram based on serological and ultrasound findings for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses

To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGynecologic oncology Vol. 160; no. 3; pp. 704 - 712
Main Authors Guo, Yunyun, Jiang, Tengjia, Ouyang, Linglong, Li, Xiaohui, He, Weipeng, Zhang, Zuwei, Shen, Hongwei, You, Zeshan, Yang, Guofen, Lai, Huiling
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model. Overall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920–0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896–0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer. The cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages. •A novel diagnostic nomogram based on age, CA125, FAR, MLR, and ultrasound result accurately predicts malignancy in patients with ovarian masses•This nomogram is easily accessible and has a higher diagnostic efficiency than ROMA, CPH-I, and RMI•Our model also has good diagnostic performance in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer
AbstractList To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model. Overall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920–0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896–0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer. The cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages. •A novel diagnostic nomogram based on age, CA125, FAR, MLR, and ultrasound result accurately predicts malignancy in patients with ovarian masses•This nomogram is easily accessible and has a higher diagnostic efficiency than ROMA, CPH-I, and RMI•Our model also has good diagnostic performance in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer
To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.OBJECTIVETo develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model.METHODSIn total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model.Overall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920-0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896-0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer.RESULTSOverall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920-0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896-0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer.The cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages.CONCLUSIONThe cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages.
AbstractObjectiveTo develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. MethodsIn total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model. ResultsOverall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920–0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896–0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer. ConclusionThe cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages.
To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model. Overall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920-0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896-0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer. The cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages.
Author He, Weipeng
Lai, Huiling
Li, Xiaohui
You, Zeshan
Shen, Hongwei
Zhang, Zuwei
Yang, Guofen
Ouyang, Linglong
Guo, Yunyun
Jiang, Tengjia
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yunyun
  surname: Guo
  fullname: Guo, Yunyun
  organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tengjia
  surname: Jiang
  fullname: Jiang, Tengjia
  organization: State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Linglong
  surname: Ouyang
  fullname: Ouyang, Linglong
  organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Xiaohui
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Xiaohui
  organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Weipeng
  surname: He
  fullname: He, Weipeng
  organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Zuwei
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Zuwei
  organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Hongwei
  surname: Shen
  fullname: Shen, Hongwei
  organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Zeshan
  surname: You
  fullname: You, Zeshan
  organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Guofen
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Guofen
  email: yangguof@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Huiling
  surname: Lai
  fullname: Lai, Huiling
  email: laihling@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkstu1TAQhi1URE8LT4CEvGSTgy-5WQikquImVWIBrC3HHgcfEjvYyUF5DZ4Yh9NuKkFXtkf_N9b8_1ygMx88IPSckj0ltH512K_96sOeEZYrbE9I_QjtKBFVUbeVOEM7QgQpWla15-gipQMhhBPKnqBzznnViErs0O8r7MMRBmyc6n1Is9O5MIY-qhF3KoHBweMEMQyhd1oNWHmDl2GOKoUlX63zxvk-YRsiniKECaKa3RG2h3F6dpkPFo9qcL1XXq_YeTxlCfg54V9u_o7DUUWnfNakBOkpemzVkODZ7XmJvr1_9_X6Y3Hz-cOn66ubQleUzgW1QhBVVhZs29StLoVlrBM1K7tczAaZtqQlq1hDjNCV7QxXNbeKKtIpCy2_RC9PfacYfi6QZjm6pGEYlIewJMnKhpdE1KLO0he30qUbwcgpulHFVd75mAXiJNAxpBTBSu1mtc2ejXKDpERumcmD_JuZ3DKTlMmcWWb5Pfau_f-pNycKskVHB1EmnS3V2fMIepYmuAf4t_d4PTi_JfwDVkiHsESf3ZdUpgzIL9subavECC9p02wjv_53gwe__wMqYd4g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1159_000531939
crossref_primary_10_3390_curroncol29040220
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_025_04842_x
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_5952296
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2589_7500_23_00245_5
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_66509_9
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines10112683
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_7425
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14153719
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13048_023_01116_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_022_02272_z
Cites_doi 10.3322/caac.21456
10.21037/atm.2019.04.78
10.1002/cncr.26241
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.031
10.1186/s12885-017-3220-x
10.1038/sj.bjc.6606092
10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.004
10.1590/S1516-31801999000200008
10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068
10.1038/s41568-020-0267-9
10.1111/eci.12917
10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.021
10.3322/caac.21590
10.1097/IGC.0000000000001233
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02448.x
10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70357-1
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821b5118
10.1371/journal.pone.0182383
10.1515/CCLM.2011.075
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.041
10.1186/s13048-019-0527-z
10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70273-5
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000303
10.1038/nrc2644
10.1001/jama.2017.12126
10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9791
10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00287.x
10.1002/ijgo.12949
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 The Author(s)
The Authors
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 The Author(s)
– notice: The Authors
– notice: Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic


PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1095-6859
EndPage 712
ExternalDocumentID 33357959
10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006
S0090825820341779
1_s2_0_S0090825820341779
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29I
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADFGL
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CAG
COF
CS3
DM4
DU5
EBS
EFBJH
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HED
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IH2
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
LG5
M29
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OQ.
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PH~
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UDS
UHS
UV1
WUQ
X7M
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZMT
ZU3
ZXP
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-1f990a45fef8768c49f22b9624b45f016d841425270d9c5fbd3a63fa1a0bafe83
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0090-8258
1095-6859
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 05:43:58 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:03:55 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:08:14 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:33 EDT 2025
Sun Apr 06 06:58:50 EDT 2025
Tue Feb 25 20:12:32 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 17:12:30 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Ovarian mass
Risk of malignancy
Diagnosis
Nomogram
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c511t-1f990a45fef8768c49f22b9624b45f016d841425270d9c5fbd3a63fa1a0bafe83
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825820341779
PMID 33357959
PQID 2473409696
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2473409696
pubmed_primary_33357959
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0090825820341779
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Gynecologic oncology
PublicationTitleAlternate Gynecol Oncol
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Jacobs, Oram, Fairbanks, Turner, Frost, Grudzinskas (bb0105) 1990; 97
Tian, Song, Tian, Sun (bb0075) 2018; 48
Marchetti, Romito, Musella, Santo, Palaia, Perniola (bb0150) 2018; 28
Van Gorp, Cadron, Despierre, Daemen, Leunen, Amant (bb0120) 2011; 104
Gong, Jiang, Shu, Hu, Huang, Liu (bb0140) 2019; 12
Alba, Agoritsas, Walsh, Hanna, Iorio, Devereaux (bb0155) 2017; 318
Siegel, Miller, Jemal (bb0010) 2020; 70
Timmerman, Valentin, Bourne, Collins, Verrelst, Vergote (bb0085) 2000; 16
Tavares Murta, Machado, Zaparoli, Lara, Murta (bb0145) 1999; 117
Seebacher, Aust, D’Andrea, Grimm, Reiser, Tiringer (bb0135) 2017; 12
Torre, Trabert, DeSantis, Miller, Samimi, Runowicz (bb0005) 2018; 68
Montagnana, Danese, Ruzzenente, Bresciani, Nuzzo, Gelati (bb0110) 2011; 49
Iasonos, Schrag, Raj, Panageas (bb0090) 2008; 26
Moore, Pfeiffer, Zhang, Lu, Fung, Bast (bb0130) 2012; 118
Goonewardene, Hall, Rustin (bb0045) 2007; 8
Man, Wang, Hao, Liu, Liu, Zhu (bb0060) 2015; 25
Bast (bb0035) 2003; 21
Karlsen, Høgdall, Christensen, Borgfeldt, Kalapotharakos, Zdrazilova-Dubska (bb0100) 2015; 138
Liu, Chen, Zheng, Ding, Zhang, Wang (bb0065) 2017; 17
Sevinc, Adli, Kalender, Camci (bb0040) 2007; 8
Cao, Ni, Wang, Wang, Yuan, Gan (bb0080) 2019; 7
Nasioudis, Sisti, Kanninen, Holcomb, Di Tommaso, Fambrini (bb0015) 2016; 141
Timmerman, Ameye, Fischerova, Epstein, Melis, Guerriero (bb0025) 2010; c6839
Moore, McMeekin, Brown, DiSilvestro, Miller, Allard (bb0095) 2009; 112
Bast, Hennessy, Mills (bb0020) 2009; 9
de Bono, Guo, Gurel, De Marzo, Sfanos, Mani (bb0050) 2020; 20
Van Calster, Van Hoorde, Valentin, Testa, Fischerova, Van Holsbeke (bb0030) 2014; g5920
Hefler-Frischmuth, Lafleur, Hefler, Polterauer, Seebacher, Reinthaller (bb0055) 2015; 136
Chen, Wang, Shu, Xu, Wu, Yu (bb0070) 2019; 147
Aslan, Onan, Yilmaz, Bukan, Erdem (bb0115) 2020; 49
Ueland, Desimone, Seamon, Miller, Goodrich, Podzielinski (bb0125) 2011; 117
Hefler-Frischmuth (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0055) 2015; 136
Chen (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0070) 2019; 147
Gong (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0140) 2019; 12
Cao (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0080) 2019; 7
Torre (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0005) 2018; 68
Sevinc (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0040) 2007; 8
Alba (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0155) 2017; 318
Man (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0060) 2015; 25
Van Calster (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0030) 2014; g5920
Timmerman (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0025) 2010; c6839
Moore (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0130) 2012; 118
Iasonos (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0090) 2008; 26
Nasioudis (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0015) 2016; 141
Moore (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0095) 2009; 112
Aslan (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0115) 2020; 49
Tavares Murta (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0145) 1999; 117
Tian (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0075) 2018; 48
Seebacher (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0135) 2017; 12
Liu (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0065) 2017; 17
Ueland (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0125) 2011; 117
Marchetti (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0150) 2018; 28
Bast (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0035) 2003; 21
de Bono (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0050) 2020; 20
Siegel (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0010) 2020; 70
Goonewardene (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0045) 2007; 8
Jacobs (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0105) 1990; 97
Karlsen (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0100) 2015; 138
Van Gorp (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0120) 2011; 104
Bast (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0020) 2009; 9
Montagnana (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0110) 2011; 49
Timmerman (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0085) 2000; 16
References_xml – volume: 9
  start-page: 415
  year: 2009
  end-page: 428
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation
  publication-title: Nat. Rev. Cancer
– volume: 21
  year: 2003
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening
  publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol.
– volume: 8
  start-page: 813
  year: 2007
  end-page: 821
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: Management of asymptomatic patients on follow-up for ovarian cancer with rising CA-125 concentrations
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
– volume: 136
  start-page: 567
  year: 2015
  end-page: 570
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Plasma fibrinogen levels in patients with benign and malignant ovarian tumors
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
– volume: 318
  start-page: 1377
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1384
  ident: bb0155
  article-title: Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: Users’ guides to the medical literature
  publication-title: JAMA.
– volume: 17
  start-page: 285
  year: 2017
  ident: bb0065
  article-title: The prognostic value of the preoperative c-reactive protein/albumin ratio in ovarian cancer
  publication-title: BMC Cancer
– volume: 70
  start-page: 7
  year: 2020
  end-page: 30
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: Cancer statistics, 2020
  publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin.
– volume: 97
  start-page: 922
  year: 1990
  end-page: 929
  ident: bb0105
  article-title: A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer
  publication-title: Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 24
  year: 2015
  end-page: 32
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: Pretreatment plasma D-dimer, fibrinogen, and platelet levels significantly impact prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer independently of venous thromboembolism
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
– volume: 48
  start-page: e12917
  year: 2018
  ident: bb0075
  article-title: Prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Eur. J. Clin. Investig.
– volume: c6839
  start-page: 341
  year: 2010
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 117
  start-page: 87
  year: 1999
  end-page: 92
  ident: bb0145
  article-title: The relationship of host immune cells, cytokine and nitric oxide production to tumor cells in ovarian carcinoma
  publication-title: Sao Paulo Med. J.
– volume: 20
  start-page: 455
  year: 2020
  end-page: 469
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: Prostate carcinogenesis: inflammatory storms
  publication-title: Nat. Rev. Cancer
– volume: 138
  start-page: 640
  year: 2015
  end-page: 646
  ident: bb0100
  article-title: A novel diagnostic index combining HE4, CA125 and age may improve triage of women with suspected ovarian cancer - an international multicenter study in women with an ovarian mass
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
– volume: 112
  start-page: 40
  year: 2009
  end-page: 46
  ident: bb0095
  article-title: A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
– volume: 49
  year: 2020
  ident: bb0115
  article-title: Comparison of HE 4, CA 125, ROMA score and ultrasound score in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses
  publication-title: J. Gynecol. Obstetr. Hum. Reprod.
– volume: 117
  start-page: 1289
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1297
  ident: bb0125
  article-title: Effectiveness of a multivariate index assay in the preoperative assessment of ovarian tumors
  publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol.
– volume: 68
  start-page: 284
  year: 2018
  end-page: 296
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018
  publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 51
  year: 2019
  ident: bb0140
  article-title: Prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: J. Ovarian Res.
– volume: 118
  start-page: 91
  year: 2012
  end-page: 100
  ident: bb0130
  article-title: Proteomic biomarkers in combination with CA 125 for detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using prediagnostic serum samples from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial
  publication-title: Cancer.
– volume: 141
  start-page: 128
  year: 2016
  end-page: 133
  ident: bb0015
  article-title: Epidemiology and outcomes of squamous ovarian carcinoma; a population-based study
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
– volume: 147
  start-page: 212
  year: 2019
  end-page: 218
  ident: bb0070
  article-title: Diagnostic value of serum D-dimer, CA125, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in differentiating ovarian cancer and endometriosis
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1364
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1370
  ident: bb0090
  article-title: How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis
  publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol.
– volume: g5920
  start-page: 349
  year: 2014
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1054
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1055
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: Benign causes of increased serum CA-125 concentration
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
– volume: 49
  start-page: 521
  year: 2011
  end-page: 525
  ident: bb0110
  article-title: The ROMA (risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful?
  publication-title: Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.
– volume: 104
  start-page: 863
  year: 2011
  end-page: 870
  ident: bb0120
  article-title: HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm
  publication-title: Br. J. Cancer
– volume: 28
  start-page: 939
  year: 2018
  end-page: 944
  ident: bb0150
  article-title: Combined plasma fibrinogen and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in ovarian cancer prognosis may play a role?
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
– volume: 16
  start-page: 500
  year: 2000
  end-page: 505
  ident: bb0085
  article-title: Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) group
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.
– volume: 7
  start-page: 242
  year: 2019
  ident: bb0080
  article-title: Clinical and prognostic significance of combined plasma fibrinogen concentrations and the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ovarian cancer
  publication-title: Ann. Transl. Med.
– volume: 12
  year: 2017
  ident: bb0135
  article-title: Development of a tool for prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with adnexal masses: value of plasma fibrinogen
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 68
  start-page: 284
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0005
  article-title: Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018
  publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin.
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21456
– volume: 7
  start-page: 242
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0080
  article-title: Clinical and prognostic significance of combined plasma fibrinogen concentrations and the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ovarian cancer
  publication-title: Ann. Transl. Med.
  doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.78
– volume: 118
  start-page: 91
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0130
  article-title: Proteomic biomarkers in combination with CA 125 for detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using prediagnostic serum samples from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.26241
– volume: 112
  start-page: 40
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0095
  article-title: A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.031
– volume: 17
  start-page: 285
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0065
  article-title: The prognostic value of the preoperative c-reactive protein/albumin ratio in ovarian cancer
  publication-title: BMC Cancer
  doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3220-x
– volume: 104
  start-page: 863
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0120
  article-title: HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm
  publication-title: Br. J. Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606092
– volume: 141
  start-page: 128
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0015
  article-title: Epidemiology and outcomes of squamous ovarian carcinoma; a population-based study
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.004
– volume: 117
  start-page: 87
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0145
  article-title: The relationship of host immune cells, cytokine and nitric oxide production to tumor cells in ovarian carcinoma
  publication-title: Sao Paulo Med. J.
  doi: 10.1590/S1516-31801999000200008
– volume: 21
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0035
  article-title: Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening
  publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068
– volume: 20
  start-page: 455
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0050
  article-title: Prostate carcinogenesis: inflammatory storms
  publication-title: Nat. Rev. Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0267-9
– volume: 48
  start-page: e12917
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0075
  article-title: Prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Eur. J. Clin. Investig.
  doi: 10.1111/eci.12917
– volume: 138
  start-page: 640
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0100
  article-title: A novel diagnostic index combining HE4, CA125 and age may improve triage of women with suspected ovarian cancer - an international multicenter study in women with an ovarian mass
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.021
– volume: 70
  start-page: 7
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0010
  article-title: Cancer statistics, 2020
  publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin.
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21590
– volume: 28
  start-page: 939
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0150
  article-title: Combined plasma fibrinogen and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in ovarian cancer prognosis may play a role?
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
  doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001233
– volume: 97
  start-page: 922
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0105
  article-title: A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer
  publication-title: Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02448.x
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1054
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0040
  article-title: Benign causes of increased serum CA-125 concentration
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70357-1
– volume: 117
  start-page: 1289
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0125
  article-title: Effectiveness of a multivariate index assay in the preoperative assessment of ovarian tumors
  publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol.
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821b5118
– volume: 12
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0135
  article-title: Development of a tool for prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with adnexal masses: value of plasma fibrinogen
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182383
– volume: 49
  start-page: 521
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0110
  article-title: The ROMA (risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful?
  publication-title: Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.
  doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.075
– volume: g5920
  start-page: 349
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0030
  article-title: Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 136
  start-page: 567
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0055
  article-title: Plasma fibrinogen levels in patients with benign and malignant ovarian tumors
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.041
– volume: 12
  start-page: 51
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0140
  article-title: Prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: J. Ovarian Res.
  doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0527-z
– volume: 8
  start-page: 813
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0045
  article-title: Management of asymptomatic patients on follow-up for ovarian cancer with rising CA-125 concentrations
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70273-5
– volume: 25
  start-page: 24
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0060
  article-title: Pretreatment plasma D-dimer, fibrinogen, and platelet levels significantly impact prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer independently of venous thromboembolism
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
  doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000303
– volume: 9
  start-page: 415
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0020
  article-title: The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation
  publication-title: Nat. Rev. Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/nrc2644
– volume: 318
  start-page: 1377
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0155
  article-title: Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: Users’ guides to the medical literature
  publication-title: JAMA.
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126
– volume: 49
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0115
  article-title: Comparison of HE 4, CA 125, ROMA score and ultrasound score in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses
  publication-title: J. Gynecol. Obstetr. Hum. Reprod.
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1364
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0090
  article-title: How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis
  publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9791
– volume: c6839
  start-page: 341
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0025
  article-title: Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 16
  start-page: 500
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0085
  article-title: Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) group
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.
  doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00287.x
– volume: 147
  start-page: 212
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0070
  article-title: Diagnostic value of serum D-dimer, CA125, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in differentiating ovarian cancer and endometriosis
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.
  doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12949
SSID ssj0003012
Score 2.4070115
Snippet To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were...
AbstractObjectiveTo develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. MethodsIn total, 1277 patients with...
To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.OBJECTIVETo develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 704
SubjectTerms Diagnosis
Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Medicine
Nomogram
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovarian mass
Risk of malignancy
Title A novel diagnostic nomogram based on serological and ultrasound findings for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0090825820341779
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0090825820341779
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357959
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2473409696
Volume 160
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR3LahsxUIQUSi-l77qPoEKP3carxz6OJjS4NcmhNDQ3oadxcbTGawd86Uf0izuj3XUpTVPoaVkxg3Y1o5mR5kXIW2usGWvnMyd1nQkZbGbqUmY6OM3ATKpl8p6fnRfTC_HpUl4ekJMhFwbDKnvZ38n0JK37keN-NY9XiwXm-GK7bgkqDCRxWWISnxAlcvn777_CPICBu4rhKWVaVkPloRTjtZvvImYAsnG6E8S2Rzdrp79Zn0kLnT4g93vzkU66L3xIDnx8RO6e9Q7yx-THhMbm2i-p60LoAAwGrlIMFkWN5WgTKbDdIPOojo5ul5u1brHBEk0-7DhvKRizdLX2zcp3tcHxxS1SFgRtAr0C-32OxTp2dBFpX521pXitS5trOIDrCDDoUX5CLk4_fDmZZn3bhcyC9bXJ8gAaSgPZfABRWVlRB8ZMXTBhYBAWzlUih63OyrGrrQzGcV3woHM9Njr4ij8lh7GJ_jmhdWV1MKYCRWkEt8KMuQzOGl4aDoZFPiJsWG5l-5rk2BpjqYbgs28q0UghjVTOFNBoRN7tkVZdSY7bwcVARzVkm4J8VKAybkcrb0Lzbb_HW5WrFiDVH3w4IsUe8zdW_veUbwY2U7DJ0XOjo2-2rWKi5HAQL2qAedbx3_7XOecSG8a_-N9pX5J7DAN1UmDdK3K4WW_9a7C0NuYobaUjcmfycTY9x-fs89fZT6fULaA
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkYBLxbMsTyPBjdDEjzwOHCqg2tJuT63Um7Fje7Vo66w2u632wo_gr_AHGTvOIkQpElKPscZ5eMbfjDMvhF7Xqlap1CbRXFYJ47ZOVFXwRFotCZhJFQ_e89FRPjxhn0_56Qb60efC-LDKiP0dpge0jiM7cTV3ZpOJz_H17bo5qDBA4qKoYmTlgVldwLmtfb__EZj8hpC9T8cfhklsLZDUYGEskswCCkt4NWMBDsqaVZYQVeWEKRgEM0iXLANxJkWqq5pbpanMqZWZTJW0pqRw3xvoJgO48G0T3n37FVcCO6YrUR5ytHnZlzoKQWWr8cr5lEOShp-Qvs_S5erwb-ZuUHt7d9FWtFfxbrck99CGcffRrVH0yD9A33exa87NFOsuZg_IYOAsBH1hryI1bhwGOe9BFkun8XK6mMvWd3TCwWnuxi0G6xnP5qaZma4Yub_Qk5B2gRuLz-DAMPbVQVZ44nAsB9ti_x8ZN-dw4pcOaLwL-yE6uRZmPEKbrnHmMcJVWUurVAmaWTFaM5VSbnWtaKEoWDLZAJF-uUUdi6D7XhxT0Ue7fRWBR8LzSGREAI8G6O160qyrAXI1Oev5KPr0VgBkATrq6mnFZdNMG0GlFZlogVL8IfgDlK9n_rZ3_v3IV72YCUAV7yqSzjTLVhBWUDj55xXQbHfyt_50Sin3Heqf_O9jX6Lbw-PRoTjcPzp4iu4QHyUUovqeoc3FfGmeg5m3UC_CtsLoy3Xv45_oAWdn
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+novel+diagnostic+nomogram+based+on+serological+and+ultrasound+findings+for+preoperative+prediction+of+malignancy+in+patients+with+ovarian+masses&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic+oncology&rft.au=Guo%2C+Yunyun&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Tengjia&rft.au=Ouyang%2C+Linglong&rft.au=Li%2C+Xiaohui&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ygyno.2020.12.006&rft.externalDocID=S0090825820341779
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon