A novel diagnostic nomogram based on serological and ultrasound findings for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses
To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multiv...
Saved in:
Published in | Gynecologic oncology Vol. 160; no. 3; pp. 704 - 712 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.03.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.
In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model.
Overall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920–0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896–0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer.
The cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages.
•A novel diagnostic nomogram based on age, CA125, FAR, MLR, and ultrasound result accurately predicts malignancy in patients with ovarian masses•This nomogram is easily accessible and has a higher diagnostic efficiency than ROMA, CPH-I, and RMI•Our model also has good diagnostic performance in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer |
---|---|
AbstractList | To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.
In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model.
Overall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920–0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896–0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer.
The cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages.
•A novel diagnostic nomogram based on age, CA125, FAR, MLR, and ultrasound result accurately predicts malignancy in patients with ovarian masses•This nomogram is easily accessible and has a higher diagnostic efficiency than ROMA, CPH-I, and RMI•Our model also has good diagnostic performance in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.OBJECTIVETo develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model.METHODSIn total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model.Overall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920-0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896-0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer.RESULTSOverall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920-0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896-0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer.The cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages.CONCLUSIONThe cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages. AbstractObjectiveTo develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. MethodsIn total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model. ResultsOverall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920–0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896–0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer. ConclusionThe cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages. To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify valuable predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for ovarian cancer. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed. The performance of the nomogram model was assessed by its calibration and discrimination in a validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the model. Overall, 496 patients (38.8%) had ovarian cancer. Eighteen parameters were significantly different between the malignant and benign groups. Five parameters were identified as being most optimal for predicting malignancy, including age, carbohydrate antigen 125, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ultrasound result. These parameters were incorporated to establish a nomogram model, and this model exhibited an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920-0.954). The model was also well calibrated in the validation cohort and showed an AUC of 0.925 (95%CI, 0.896-0.953) at the cut-off point of 0.298. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model achieved the best clinical utility with almost the entire range of threshold probabilities. The model has demonstrated superior efficacy in predicting malignancy compared to currently available models, including the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, copenhagen index, and the risk of malignancy index. More importantly, the nomogram established here showed potential value in identification of early-stage ovarian cancer. The cost-effective and easily accessible nomogram model exhibited favorable accuracy for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses, even at early stages. |
Author | He, Weipeng Lai, Huiling Li, Xiaohui You, Zeshan Shen, Hongwei Zhang, Zuwei Yang, Guofen Ouyang, Linglong Guo, Yunyun Jiang, Tengjia |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yunyun surname: Guo fullname: Guo, Yunyun organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China – sequence: 2 givenname: Tengjia surname: Jiang fullname: Jiang, Tengjia organization: State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China – sequence: 3 givenname: Linglong surname: Ouyang fullname: Ouyang, Linglong organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China – sequence: 4 givenname: Xiaohui surname: Li fullname: Li, Xiaohui organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China – sequence: 5 givenname: Weipeng surname: He fullname: He, Weipeng organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China – sequence: 6 givenname: Zuwei surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Zuwei organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China – sequence: 7 givenname: Hongwei surname: Shen fullname: Shen, Hongwei organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China – sequence: 8 givenname: Zeshan surname: You fullname: You, Zeshan organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China – sequence: 9 givenname: Guofen surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Guofen email: yangguof@mail.sysu.edu.cn organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China – sequence: 10 givenname: Huiling surname: Lai fullname: Lai, Huiling email: laihling@mail.sysu.edu.cn organization: Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, PR China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkstu1TAQhi1URE8LT4CEvGSTgy-5WQikquImVWIBrC3HHgcfEjvYyUF5DZ4Yh9NuKkFXtkf_N9b8_1ygMx88IPSckj0ltH512K_96sOeEZYrbE9I_QjtKBFVUbeVOEM7QgQpWla15-gipQMhhBPKnqBzznnViErs0O8r7MMRBmyc6n1Is9O5MIY-qhF3KoHBweMEMQyhd1oNWHmDl2GOKoUlX63zxvk-YRsiniKECaKa3RG2h3F6dpkPFo9qcL1XXq_YeTxlCfg54V9u_o7DUUWnfNakBOkpemzVkODZ7XmJvr1_9_X6Y3Hz-cOn66ubQleUzgW1QhBVVhZs29StLoVlrBM1K7tczAaZtqQlq1hDjNCV7QxXNbeKKtIpCy2_RC9PfacYfi6QZjm6pGEYlIewJMnKhpdE1KLO0he30qUbwcgpulHFVd75mAXiJNAxpBTBSu1mtc2ejXKDpERumcmD_JuZ3DKTlMmcWWb5Pfau_f-pNycKskVHB1EmnS3V2fMIepYmuAf4t_d4PTi_JfwDVkiHsESf3ZdUpgzIL9subavECC9p02wjv_53gwe__wMqYd4g |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1159_000531939 crossref_primary_10_3390_curroncol29040220 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_025_04842_x crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_5952296 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2589_7500_23_00245_5 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_66509_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines10112683 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_7425 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14153719 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13048_023_01116_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_022_02272_z |
Cites_doi | 10.3322/caac.21456 10.21037/atm.2019.04.78 10.1002/cncr.26241 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.031 10.1186/s12885-017-3220-x 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606092 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.004 10.1590/S1516-31801999000200008 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068 10.1038/s41568-020-0267-9 10.1111/eci.12917 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.021 10.3322/caac.21590 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001233 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02448.x 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70357-1 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821b5118 10.1371/journal.pone.0182383 10.1515/CCLM.2011.075 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.041 10.1186/s13048-019-0527-z 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70273-5 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000303 10.1038/nrc2644 10.1001/jama.2017.12126 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9791 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00287.x 10.1002/ijgo.12949 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 The Author(s) The Authors Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 The Author(s) – notice: The Authors – notice: Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1095-6859 |
EndPage | 712 |
ExternalDocumentID | 33357959 10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006 S0090825820341779 1_s2_0_S0090825820341779 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29I 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADFGL ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CAG COF CS3 DM4 DU5 EBS EFBJH EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HED HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE J1W K-O KOM L7B LG5 M29 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OQ. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PH~ Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UDS UHS UV1 WUQ X7M XPP Z5R ZGI ZMT ZU3 ZXP ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG 6I. AAFTH AAYXX AGRNS CITATION NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-1f990a45fef8768c49f22b9624b45f016d841425270d9c5fbd3a63fa1a0bafe83 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 05:43:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:03:55 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:08:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:33 EDT 2025 Sun Apr 06 06:58:50 EDT 2025 Tue Feb 25 20:12:32 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 17:12:30 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Ovarian mass Risk of malignancy Diagnosis Nomogram |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c511t-1f990a45fef8768c49f22b9624b45f016d841425270d9c5fbd3a63fa1a0bafe83 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825820341779 |
PMID | 33357959 |
PQID | 2473409696 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2473409696 pubmed_primary_33357959 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0090825820341779 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_006 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-03-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2021 text: 2021-03-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Gynecologic oncology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Gynecol Oncol |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Jacobs, Oram, Fairbanks, Turner, Frost, Grudzinskas (bb0105) 1990; 97 Tian, Song, Tian, Sun (bb0075) 2018; 48 Marchetti, Romito, Musella, Santo, Palaia, Perniola (bb0150) 2018; 28 Van Gorp, Cadron, Despierre, Daemen, Leunen, Amant (bb0120) 2011; 104 Gong, Jiang, Shu, Hu, Huang, Liu (bb0140) 2019; 12 Alba, Agoritsas, Walsh, Hanna, Iorio, Devereaux (bb0155) 2017; 318 Siegel, Miller, Jemal (bb0010) 2020; 70 Timmerman, Valentin, Bourne, Collins, Verrelst, Vergote (bb0085) 2000; 16 Tavares Murta, Machado, Zaparoli, Lara, Murta (bb0145) 1999; 117 Seebacher, Aust, D’Andrea, Grimm, Reiser, Tiringer (bb0135) 2017; 12 Torre, Trabert, DeSantis, Miller, Samimi, Runowicz (bb0005) 2018; 68 Montagnana, Danese, Ruzzenente, Bresciani, Nuzzo, Gelati (bb0110) 2011; 49 Iasonos, Schrag, Raj, Panageas (bb0090) 2008; 26 Moore, Pfeiffer, Zhang, Lu, Fung, Bast (bb0130) 2012; 118 Goonewardene, Hall, Rustin (bb0045) 2007; 8 Man, Wang, Hao, Liu, Liu, Zhu (bb0060) 2015; 25 Bast (bb0035) 2003; 21 Karlsen, Høgdall, Christensen, Borgfeldt, Kalapotharakos, Zdrazilova-Dubska (bb0100) 2015; 138 Liu, Chen, Zheng, Ding, Zhang, Wang (bb0065) 2017; 17 Sevinc, Adli, Kalender, Camci (bb0040) 2007; 8 Cao, Ni, Wang, Wang, Yuan, Gan (bb0080) 2019; 7 Nasioudis, Sisti, Kanninen, Holcomb, Di Tommaso, Fambrini (bb0015) 2016; 141 Timmerman, Ameye, Fischerova, Epstein, Melis, Guerriero (bb0025) 2010; c6839 Moore, McMeekin, Brown, DiSilvestro, Miller, Allard (bb0095) 2009; 112 Bast, Hennessy, Mills (bb0020) 2009; 9 de Bono, Guo, Gurel, De Marzo, Sfanos, Mani (bb0050) 2020; 20 Van Calster, Van Hoorde, Valentin, Testa, Fischerova, Van Holsbeke (bb0030) 2014; g5920 Hefler-Frischmuth, Lafleur, Hefler, Polterauer, Seebacher, Reinthaller (bb0055) 2015; 136 Chen, Wang, Shu, Xu, Wu, Yu (bb0070) 2019; 147 Aslan, Onan, Yilmaz, Bukan, Erdem (bb0115) 2020; 49 Ueland, Desimone, Seamon, Miller, Goodrich, Podzielinski (bb0125) 2011; 117 Hefler-Frischmuth (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0055) 2015; 136 Chen (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0070) 2019; 147 Gong (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0140) 2019; 12 Cao (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0080) 2019; 7 Torre (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0005) 2018; 68 Sevinc (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0040) 2007; 8 Alba (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0155) 2017; 318 Man (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0060) 2015; 25 Van Calster (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0030) 2014; g5920 Timmerman (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0025) 2010; c6839 Moore (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0130) 2012; 118 Iasonos (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0090) 2008; 26 Nasioudis (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0015) 2016; 141 Moore (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0095) 2009; 112 Aslan (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0115) 2020; 49 Tavares Murta (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0145) 1999; 117 Tian (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0075) 2018; 48 Seebacher (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0135) 2017; 12 Liu (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0065) 2017; 17 Ueland (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0125) 2011; 117 Marchetti (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0150) 2018; 28 Bast (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0035) 2003; 21 de Bono (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0050) 2020; 20 Siegel (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0010) 2020; 70 Goonewardene (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0045) 2007; 8 Jacobs (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0105) 1990; 97 Karlsen (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0100) 2015; 138 Van Gorp (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0120) 2011; 104 Bast (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0020) 2009; 9 Montagnana (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0110) 2011; 49 Timmerman (10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0085) 2000; 16 |
References_xml | – volume: 9 start-page: 415 year: 2009 end-page: 428 ident: bb0020 article-title: The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation publication-title: Nat. Rev. Cancer – volume: 21 year: 2003 ident: bb0035 article-title: Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol. – volume: 8 start-page: 813 year: 2007 end-page: 821 ident: bb0045 article-title: Management of asymptomatic patients on follow-up for ovarian cancer with rising CA-125 concentrations publication-title: Lancet Oncol. – volume: 136 start-page: 567 year: 2015 end-page: 570 ident: bb0055 article-title: Plasma fibrinogen levels in patients with benign and malignant ovarian tumors publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. – volume: 318 start-page: 1377 year: 2017 end-page: 1384 ident: bb0155 article-title: Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: Users’ guides to the medical literature publication-title: JAMA. – volume: 17 start-page: 285 year: 2017 ident: bb0065 article-title: The prognostic value of the preoperative c-reactive protein/albumin ratio in ovarian cancer publication-title: BMC Cancer – volume: 70 start-page: 7 year: 2020 end-page: 30 ident: bb0010 article-title: Cancer statistics, 2020 publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin. – volume: 97 start-page: 922 year: 1990 end-page: 929 ident: bb0105 article-title: A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer publication-title: Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. – volume: 25 start-page: 24 year: 2015 end-page: 32 ident: bb0060 article-title: Pretreatment plasma D-dimer, fibrinogen, and platelet levels significantly impact prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer independently of venous thromboembolism publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer – volume: 48 start-page: e12917 year: 2018 ident: bb0075 article-title: Prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis publication-title: Eur. J. Clin. Investig. – volume: c6839 start-page: 341 year: 2010 ident: bb0025 article-title: Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group publication-title: BMJ – volume: 117 start-page: 87 year: 1999 end-page: 92 ident: bb0145 article-title: The relationship of host immune cells, cytokine and nitric oxide production to tumor cells in ovarian carcinoma publication-title: Sao Paulo Med. J. – volume: 20 start-page: 455 year: 2020 end-page: 469 ident: bb0050 article-title: Prostate carcinogenesis: inflammatory storms publication-title: Nat. Rev. Cancer – volume: 138 start-page: 640 year: 2015 end-page: 646 ident: bb0100 article-title: A novel diagnostic index combining HE4, CA125 and age may improve triage of women with suspected ovarian cancer - an international multicenter study in women with an ovarian mass publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. – volume: 112 start-page: 40 year: 2009 end-page: 46 ident: bb0095 article-title: A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. – volume: 49 year: 2020 ident: bb0115 article-title: Comparison of HE 4, CA 125, ROMA score and ultrasound score in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses publication-title: J. Gynecol. Obstetr. Hum. Reprod. – volume: 117 start-page: 1289 year: 2011 end-page: 1297 ident: bb0125 article-title: Effectiveness of a multivariate index assay in the preoperative assessment of ovarian tumors publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol. – volume: 68 start-page: 284 year: 2018 end-page: 296 ident: bb0005 article-title: Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018 publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin. – volume: 12 start-page: 51 year: 2019 ident: bb0140 article-title: Prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis publication-title: J. Ovarian Res. – volume: 118 start-page: 91 year: 2012 end-page: 100 ident: bb0130 article-title: Proteomic biomarkers in combination with CA 125 for detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using prediagnostic serum samples from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial publication-title: Cancer. – volume: 141 start-page: 128 year: 2016 end-page: 133 ident: bb0015 article-title: Epidemiology and outcomes of squamous ovarian carcinoma; a population-based study publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. – volume: 147 start-page: 212 year: 2019 end-page: 218 ident: bb0070 article-title: Diagnostic value of serum D-dimer, CA125, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in differentiating ovarian cancer and endometriosis publication-title: Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. – volume: 26 start-page: 1364 year: 2008 end-page: 1370 ident: bb0090 article-title: How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol. – volume: g5920 start-page: 349 year: 2014 ident: bb0030 article-title: Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study publication-title: BMJ – volume: 8 start-page: 1054 year: 2007 end-page: 1055 ident: bb0040 article-title: Benign causes of increased serum CA-125 concentration publication-title: Lancet Oncol. – volume: 49 start-page: 521 year: 2011 end-page: 525 ident: bb0110 article-title: The ROMA (risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful? publication-title: Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. – volume: 104 start-page: 863 year: 2011 end-page: 870 ident: bb0120 article-title: HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm publication-title: Br. J. Cancer – volume: 28 start-page: 939 year: 2018 end-page: 944 ident: bb0150 article-title: Combined plasma fibrinogen and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in ovarian cancer prognosis may play a role? publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer – volume: 16 start-page: 500 year: 2000 end-page: 505 ident: bb0085 article-title: Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) group publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. – volume: 7 start-page: 242 year: 2019 ident: bb0080 article-title: Clinical and prognostic significance of combined plasma fibrinogen concentrations and the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ovarian cancer publication-title: Ann. Transl. Med. – volume: 12 year: 2017 ident: bb0135 article-title: Development of a tool for prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with adnexal masses: value of plasma fibrinogen publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 68 start-page: 284 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0005 article-title: Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018 publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin. doi: 10.3322/caac.21456 – volume: 7 start-page: 242 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0080 article-title: Clinical and prognostic significance of combined plasma fibrinogen concentrations and the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ovarian cancer publication-title: Ann. Transl. Med. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.78 – volume: 118 start-page: 91 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0130 article-title: Proteomic biomarkers in combination with CA 125 for detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using prediagnostic serum samples from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial publication-title: Cancer. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26241 – volume: 112 start-page: 40 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0095 article-title: A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.031 – volume: 17 start-page: 285 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0065 article-title: The prognostic value of the preoperative c-reactive protein/albumin ratio in ovarian cancer publication-title: BMC Cancer doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3220-x – volume: 104 start-page: 863 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0120 article-title: HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm publication-title: Br. J. Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606092 – volume: 141 start-page: 128 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0015 article-title: Epidemiology and outcomes of squamous ovarian carcinoma; a population-based study publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.004 – volume: 117 start-page: 87 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0145 article-title: The relationship of host immune cells, cytokine and nitric oxide production to tumor cells in ovarian carcinoma publication-title: Sao Paulo Med. J. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31801999000200008 – volume: 21 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0035 article-title: Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068 – volume: 20 start-page: 455 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0050 article-title: Prostate carcinogenesis: inflammatory storms publication-title: Nat. Rev. Cancer doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0267-9 – volume: 48 start-page: e12917 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0075 article-title: Prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis publication-title: Eur. J. Clin. Investig. doi: 10.1111/eci.12917 – volume: 138 start-page: 640 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0100 article-title: A novel diagnostic index combining HE4, CA125 and age may improve triage of women with suspected ovarian cancer - an international multicenter study in women with an ovarian mass publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.021 – volume: 70 start-page: 7 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0010 article-title: Cancer statistics, 2020 publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590 – volume: 28 start-page: 939 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0150 article-title: Combined plasma fibrinogen and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in ovarian cancer prognosis may play a role? publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001233 – volume: 97 start-page: 922 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0105 article-title: A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer publication-title: Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02448.x – volume: 8 start-page: 1054 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0040 article-title: Benign causes of increased serum CA-125 concentration publication-title: Lancet Oncol. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70357-1 – volume: 117 start-page: 1289 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0125 article-title: Effectiveness of a multivariate index assay in the preoperative assessment of ovarian tumors publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821b5118 – volume: 12 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0135 article-title: Development of a tool for prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with adnexal masses: value of plasma fibrinogen publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182383 – volume: 49 start-page: 521 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0110 article-title: The ROMA (risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful? publication-title: Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.075 – volume: g5920 start-page: 349 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0030 article-title: Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study publication-title: BMJ – volume: 136 start-page: 567 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0055 article-title: Plasma fibrinogen levels in patients with benign and malignant ovarian tumors publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.041 – volume: 12 start-page: 51 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0140 article-title: Prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis publication-title: J. Ovarian Res. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0527-z – volume: 8 start-page: 813 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0045 article-title: Management of asymptomatic patients on follow-up for ovarian cancer with rising CA-125 concentrations publication-title: Lancet Oncol. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70273-5 – volume: 25 start-page: 24 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0060 article-title: Pretreatment plasma D-dimer, fibrinogen, and platelet levels significantly impact prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer independently of venous thromboembolism publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000303 – volume: 9 start-page: 415 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0020 article-title: The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation publication-title: Nat. Rev. Cancer doi: 10.1038/nrc2644 – volume: 318 start-page: 1377 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0155 article-title: Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: Users’ guides to the medical literature publication-title: JAMA. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126 – volume: 49 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0115 article-title: Comparison of HE 4, CA 125, ROMA score and ultrasound score in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses publication-title: J. Gynecol. Obstetr. Hum. Reprod. – volume: 26 start-page: 1364 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0090 article-title: How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9791 – volume: c6839 start-page: 341 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0025 article-title: Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group publication-title: BMJ – volume: 16 start-page: 500 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0085 article-title: Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) group publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00287.x – volume: 147 start-page: 212 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006_bb0070 article-title: Diagnostic value of serum D-dimer, CA125, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in differentiating ovarian cancer and endometriosis publication-title: Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12949 |
SSID | ssj0003012 |
Score | 2.4070115 |
Snippet | To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.
In total, 1277 patients with ovarian masses were... AbstractObjectiveTo develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. MethodsIn total, 1277 patients with... To develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.OBJECTIVETo develop a novel diagnostic nomogram model to... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 704 |
SubjectTerms | Diagnosis Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Medicine Nomogram Obstetrics and Gynecology Ovarian mass Risk of malignancy |
Title | A novel diagnostic nomogram based on serological and ultrasound findings for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0090825820341779 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0090825820341779 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.006 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357959 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2473409696 |
Volume | 160 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR3LahsxUIQUSi-l77qPoEKP3carxz6OJjS4NcmhNDQ3oadxcbTGawd86Uf0izuj3XUpTVPoaVkxg3Y1o5mR5kXIW2usGWvnMyd1nQkZbGbqUmY6OM3ATKpl8p6fnRfTC_HpUl4ekJMhFwbDKnvZ38n0JK37keN-NY9XiwXm-GK7bgkqDCRxWWISnxAlcvn777_CPICBu4rhKWVaVkPloRTjtZvvImYAsnG6E8S2Rzdrp79Zn0kLnT4g93vzkU66L3xIDnx8RO6e9Q7yx-THhMbm2i-p60LoAAwGrlIMFkWN5WgTKbDdIPOojo5ul5u1brHBEk0-7DhvKRizdLX2zcp3tcHxxS1SFgRtAr0C-32OxTp2dBFpX521pXitS5trOIDrCDDoUX5CLk4_fDmZZn3bhcyC9bXJ8gAaSgPZfABRWVlRB8ZMXTBhYBAWzlUih63OyrGrrQzGcV3woHM9Njr4ij8lh7GJ_jmhdWV1MKYCRWkEt8KMuQzOGl4aDoZFPiJsWG5l-5rk2BpjqYbgs28q0UghjVTOFNBoRN7tkVZdSY7bwcVARzVkm4J8VKAybkcrb0Lzbb_HW5WrFiDVH3w4IsUe8zdW_veUbwY2U7DJ0XOjo2-2rWKi5HAQL2qAedbx3_7XOecSG8a_-N9pX5J7DAN1UmDdK3K4WW_9a7C0NuYobaUjcmfycTY9x-fs89fZT6fULaA |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkYBLxbMsTyPBjdDEjzwOHCqg2tJuT63Um7Fje7Vo66w2u632wo_gr_AHGTvOIkQpElKPscZ5eMbfjDMvhF7Xqlap1CbRXFYJ47ZOVFXwRFotCZhJFQ_e89FRPjxhn0_56Qb60efC-LDKiP0dpge0jiM7cTV3ZpOJz_H17bo5qDBA4qKoYmTlgVldwLmtfb__EZj8hpC9T8cfhklsLZDUYGEskswCCkt4NWMBDsqaVZYQVeWEKRgEM0iXLANxJkWqq5pbpanMqZWZTJW0pqRw3xvoJgO48G0T3n37FVcCO6YrUR5ytHnZlzoKQWWr8cr5lEOShp-Qvs_S5erwb-ZuUHt7d9FWtFfxbrck99CGcffRrVH0yD9A33exa87NFOsuZg_IYOAsBH1hryI1bhwGOe9BFkun8XK6mMvWd3TCwWnuxi0G6xnP5qaZma4Yub_Qk5B2gRuLz-DAMPbVQVZ44nAsB9ti_x8ZN-dw4pcOaLwL-yE6uRZmPEKbrnHmMcJVWUurVAmaWTFaM5VSbnWtaKEoWDLZAJF-uUUdi6D7XhxT0Ue7fRWBR8LzSGREAI8G6O160qyrAXI1Oev5KPr0VgBkATrq6mnFZdNMG0GlFZlogVL8IfgDlK9n_rZ3_v3IV72YCUAV7yqSzjTLVhBWUDj55xXQbHfyt_50Sin3Heqf_O9jX6Lbw-PRoTjcPzp4iu4QHyUUovqeoc3FfGmeg5m3UC_CtsLoy3Xv45_oAWdn |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+novel+diagnostic+nomogram+based+on+serological+and+ultrasound+findings+for+preoperative+prediction+of+malignancy+in+patients+with+ovarian+masses&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic+oncology&rft.au=Guo%2C+Yunyun&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Tengjia&rft.au=Ouyang%2C+Linglong&rft.au=Li%2C+Xiaohui&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ygyno.2020.12.006&rft.externalDocID=S0090825820341779 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon |