Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. Objective To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 15 - 16
Main Authors Comino-Suárez, Natalia, Moreno, Juan C., Megía-García, Álvaro, del-Ama, Antonio J., Serrano-Muñoz, Diego, Avendaño-Coy, Juan, Gil-Agudo, Ángel, Alcobendas-Maestro, Mónica, López-López, Esther, Gómez-Soriano, Julio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 30.01.2025
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1743-0003
1743-0003
DOI10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8

Cover

Abstract Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. Objective To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. Methods A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Results Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (− 0.97 mV) and the sham group (− 3.39 mV) at follow-up. Conclusions The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166).
AbstractList Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation.BACKGROUNDAlthough transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation.To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants.OBJECTIVETo determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants.A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up.METHODSA randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up.Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up.RESULTSAlthough no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up.The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166).CONCLUSIONSThe outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166).
Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. Objective To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. Methods A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Results Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up. Conclusions The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166). Keywords: Spinal cord injury, Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Lokomat, Robotic-assisted gait training, Motor function, Gait rehabilitation
Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up. The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up.
Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. Objective To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. Methods A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Results Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (− 0.97 mV) and the sham group (− 3.39 mV) at follow-up. Conclusions The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166).
Abstract Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. Objective To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. Methods A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Results Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (− 0.97 mV) and the sham group (− 3.39 mV) at follow-up. Conclusions The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166).
Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up. The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166).
ArticleNumber 15
Audience Academic
Author Serrano-Muñoz, Diego
Gómez-Soriano, Julio
Moreno, Juan C.
del-Ama, Antonio J.
Alcobendas-Maestro, Mónica
López-López, Esther
Gil-Agudo, Ángel
Megía-García, Álvaro
Avendaño-Coy, Juan
Comino-Suárez, Natalia
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Natalia
  surname: Comino-Suárez
  fullname: Comino-Suárez, Natalia
  organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Juan C.
  surname: Moreno
  fullname: Moreno, Juan C.
  email: jc.moreno@csic.es
  organization: BioRobotics Group, Center for Automation and Robotics, CSIC-UPM, Spanish National Research Council, Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Function (HNP-SESCAM), Associated Unit of R&D&I to the CSIC
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Álvaro
  surname: Megía-García
  fullname: Megía-García, Álvaro
  organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Antonio J.
  surname: del-Ama
  fullname: del-Ama, Antonio J.
  organization: Bioengineering Systems and Technologies Research Group, School of Science and Technology, Rey Juan Carlos University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Diego
  surname: Serrano-Muñoz
  fullname: Serrano-Muñoz, Diego
  organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Juan
  surname: Avendaño-Coy
  fullname: Avendaño-Coy, Juan
  organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Ángel
  surname: Gil-Agudo
  fullname: Gil-Agudo, Ángel
  organization: Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Function (HNP-SESCAM), Associated Unit of R&D&I to the CSIC, Biomechanics and Technical Aids Unit, National Hospital for Paraplegics
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Mónica
  surname: Alcobendas-Maestro
  fullname: Alcobendas-Maestro, Mónica
  organization: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Hospital for Paraplegics
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Esther
  surname: López-López
  fullname: López-López, Esther
  organization: Department of Physical Therapy, National Hospital for Paraplegics
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Julio
  surname: Gómez-Soriano
  fullname: Gómez-Soriano, Julio
  organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39885542$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Ustu3SAQtapUzaP9gS4qpG66cQq2sXE3VRT1EalSN-kaYRh8ucJwCzjR7S_3J4rjpMqtqggkRsM5Z2bgnBZHzjsoitcEnxPC2veRVD1rSlzREhPa0JI9K05I19Qlxrg-ehQfF6cxbnPQYNq8KI7rnjFKm-qk-H0dhItyTsKBnyOKO-OERdIHhWIy02xFMt7lxDQYBwrdmrRBwQ8-GVmKGE1MOTt4tUe3YMZNKuO82_mwZFMAoSZjbY6EccaNCNxGOAkRTT75gGIuBEg4hUZhEgog_Q2EPTIu71xzZyHBQVPGbeew_4AEUn4eLJSDNZmep1B-Mr9yVeldCt7aJcx3RoqlvhH2ZfFcCxvh1f15Vvz4_On68mv57fuXq8uLb6WkBKdSMF2RWjako7prB10NNcYdawdMWzVoSWqtNe4JZgB1y3RPQLdK404BJZo19VlxteoqL7Z8F8wkwp57YfhdwoeRi5CfzwJvqhYIZUILphoFoq9bqlij-1ZjUlGStT6uWrt5mEBJyLMJeyB6eOPMho_-hhPSMZxXVnh3rxD8zxli4pOJEqxdf5zXpCU9oV1FM_TtCh1F7s047bOkXOD8glW0pXVdVxl1_h9UXgomkx8ftMn5A8KbxzP8bf7BhRnAVoAMPsYAmkuT7ny3-MZygvlieL4anmfD8zvD82W66h_qg_qTpHolxQx2IwS-9XPIFotPsf4AbOcaVA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2025_e42597
Cites_doi 10.1038/s41393-018-0063-5
10.1515/BMT-2013-4014/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS
10.1038/SC.2017.31
10.3390/JCM10153278
10.1016/J.PMR.2020.03.005
10.3390/JCM10061167
10.1089/NEU.2018.5956
10.1080/10790268.2021.2000200
10.3390/BRAINSCI11040472
10.1002/MUS.20700
10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2834339
10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3049133
10.1212/WNL.54.8.1574
10.1016/J.MEDCLI.2010.09.034
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2374-19.2020
10.33588/rn.5504.2012229
10.3389/fnins.2017.00333
10.1038/SC.2010.158
10.1089/NEU.2015.4008
10.1177/1545968312438437
10.1111/AOR.12615
10.1093/PTJ/67.2.206
10.3389/FNINS.2020.00416
10.3390/JCM9103275
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0260166
10.1080/09638280601046302
10.1310/SCI1802-106
10.1177/1545968306295556
10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90213-1
10.1186/S12984-017-0271-9/FIGURES/6
10.1089/NEU.2011.2226
10.1177/1545968319893298
10.1038/s41582-019-0280-3
10.1016/J.PMRJ.2010.01.004
10.1038/SJ.SC.3102007
10.1186/S12984-019-0591-Z
10.1016/J.JOCN.2021.07.019
10.1038/S41393-019-0242-Z
10.1177/1545968307301880
10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1421::aid-sim266>3.0.co;2-h
10.1111/cns.12530
10.3389/FPHYS.2021.756200
10.1038/s41394-020-00359-1
10.1186/S12984-017-0232-3
10.1016/J.APMR.2004.02.010
10.3390/BIOMEDICINES11020589
10.3109/10601331003777444
10.3390/BIOENGINEERING10050528
10.2340/16501977-0525
10.1177/1545968315591706
10.1016/0003-9993(94)90131-7
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0189734
10.1016/J.FT.2023.06.001
10.1089/NEU.2019.6588
10.1152/JN.00532.2005
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0192013
10.1038/s41598-018-33123-5
10.3389/FNINS.2024.1372222
10.1038/SJ.SC.3102134
10.1038/S41393-021-00734-1
10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000149
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2025
2025. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
The Author(s) 2025 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2025
– notice: 2025. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic




MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Engineering
Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
EISSN 1743-0003
EndPage 16
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_426e158afa8d4dea9365d84f96f01251
PMC11780808
A825653332
39885542
10_1186_s12984_025_01545_8
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Spain
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Spain
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC)
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29L
2QV
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
7RV
7X7
88E
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABJCF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
AQUVI
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
I-F
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPY
ITC
KQ8
L6V
LK8
M0T
M1P
M48
M7P
M7S
ML0
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~8M
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-a8f213c4175f76bf2b300786b056dbfc13fff09108ee368f91ef6df07de51f843
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1743-0003
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:17:41 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:38:11 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 18:07:00 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:01:21 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:01:19 EDT 2025
Sun Jun 29 01:31:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:20:03 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:30 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:18:51 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Robotic-assisted gait training
Gait rehabilitation
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
Lokomat
Spinal cord injury
Motor function
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c510t-a8f213c4175f76bf2b300786b056dbfc13fff09108ee368f91ef6df07de51f843
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8
PMID 39885542
PQID 3161915725
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_426e158afa8d4dea9365d84f96f01251
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11780808
proquest_miscellaneous_3161915725
gale_infotracmisc_A825653332
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A825653332
pubmed_primary_39885542
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12984_025_01545_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_025_01545_8
springer_journals_10_1186_s12984_025_01545_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-01-30
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-01-30
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-01-30
  day: 30
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
PublicationTitleAbbrev J NeuroEngineering Rehabil
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neuroeng Rehabil
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References F Inanici (1545_CR48) 2018; 26
K Minassian (1545_CR7) 2016; 22
F Inanici (1545_CR54) 2021; 29
JA Petersen (1545_CR27) 2012; 26
RW Bohannon (1545_CR34) 1987; 67
A Curt (1545_CR57) 1998; 79
M Itzkovich (1545_CR39) 2007; 29
K Minassian (1545_CR13) 2007; 35
D Serrano-Muñoz (1545_CR65) 2017
US Hofstoetter (1545_CR24) 2014; 37
RJA Little (1545_CR43) 2020
K Minassian (1545_CR19) 2016; 30
KE James (1545_CR44) 1996; 15
KY Nam (1545_CR4) 2017
A Megía García (1545_CR10) 2020; 34
L García-Alén (1545_CR31) 2023
S Estes (1545_CR20) 2021; 10
1545_CR2
US Hofstoetter (1545_CR11) 2018
H Bang (1545_CR41) 2010; 27
S Tajali (1545_CR29) 2024
RH De Paz (1545_CR8) 2019
CY Fang (1545_CR63) 2021
US Hofstoetter (1545_CR15) 2015; 39
1545_CR32
FD Benavides (1545_CR56) 2020; 40
P Gad (1545_CR21) 2017; 11
J Gómez-Soriano (1545_CR12) 2023; 45
US Hofstoetter (1545_CR50) 2021
US Hofstoetter (1545_CR14) 2013
HJ Van Hedel (1545_CR38) 2005; 86
N Aravind (1545_CR61) 2019; 57
C Taylor (1545_CR26) 2021
KL Sainani (1545_CR42) 2010; 2
US Hofstoetter (1545_CR53) 2020; 37
AR Alashram (1545_CR25) 2023; 46
LP Hiersemenzel (1545_CR52) 2000; 54
J Benito (1545_CR9) 2012; 18
J Gómez-Soriano (1545_CR55) 2012; 55
JF Ditunno (1545_CR40) 2007; 21
G Scivoletto (1545_CR62) 2013; 49
RL Waters (1545_CR47) 1994; 75
JM Hope (1545_CR51) 2023
TH Hutson (1545_CR28) 2019; 15
JW Fawcett (1545_CR30) 2007; 45
A Cobos-Carbó (1545_CR33) 2011; 137
Y Freyvert (1545_CR49) 2018
LA Simpson (1545_CR3) 2012; 29
J Mehrholz (1545_CR6) 2017; 55
SL Thomas (1545_CR59) 2005; 94
EA Bye (1545_CR64) 2022; 60
JC Shin (1545_CR45) 2011; 49
EY Shapkova (1545_CR22) 2020
LV McHugh (1545_CR23) 2020
DG Sayenko (1545_CR18) 2019; 36
T Lam (1545_CR60) 2008; 46
H Kumru (1545_CR66) 2021
YP Gerasimenko (1545_CR17) 2015; 32
AR Alashram (1545_CR5) 2021; 91
PB Mills (1545_CR35) 2018; 56
B Dobkin (1545_CR46) 2007; 21
PK Bedi (1545_CR16) 2016; 12
S Kirshblum (1545_CR37) 2020; 31
M Wessels (1545_CR1) 2010; 42
Á Megía-García (1545_CR36) 2020; 9
E Bravo-Esteban (1545_CR58) 2017; 14
References_xml – volume: 56
  start-page: 569
  year: 2018
  ident: 1545_CR35
  publication-title: Spinal Cord
  doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0063-5
– year: 2013
  ident: 1545_CR14
  publication-title: Biomed Tech (Berl)
  doi: 10.1515/BMT-2013-4014/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS
– volume: 55
  start-page: 722
  year: 2017
  ident: 1545_CR6
  publication-title: Spinal Cord
  doi: 10.1038/SC.2017.31
– year: 2021
  ident: 1545_CR66
  publication-title: J Clin Med
  doi: 10.3390/JCM10153278
– volume: 31
  start-page: 319
  year: 2020
  ident: 1545_CR37
  publication-title: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am
  doi: 10.1016/J.PMR.2020.03.005
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 1545_CR20
  publication-title: J Clin Med
  doi: 10.3390/JCM10061167
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1435
  year: 2019
  ident: 1545_CR18
  publication-title: J Neurotrauma
  doi: 10.1089/NEU.2018.5956
– volume: 46
  start-page: 582
  year: 2023
  ident: 1545_CR25
  publication-title: J Spinal Cord Med
  doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.2000200
– year: 2021
  ident: 1545_CR50
  publication-title: Brain Sci
  doi: 10.3390/BRAINSCI11040472
– volume: 35
  start-page: 327
  year: 2007
  ident: 1545_CR13
  publication-title: Muscle Nerve
  doi: 10.1002/MUS.20700
– ident: 1545_CR32
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1272
  year: 2018
  ident: 1545_CR48
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2834339
– volume: 29
  start-page: 310
  year: 2021
  ident: 1545_CR54
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3049133
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1574
  year: 2000
  ident: 1545_CR52
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.54.8.1574
– volume: 137
  start-page: 213
  year: 2011
  ident: 1545_CR33
  publication-title: Med Clin (Barc)
  doi: 10.1016/J.MEDCLI.2010.09.034
– volume: 40
  start-page: 2633
  year: 2020
  ident: 1545_CR56
  publication-title: J Neurosci
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2374-19.2020
– volume: 55
  start-page: 217
  year: 2012
  ident: 1545_CR55
  publication-title: Rev Neurol
  doi: 10.33588/rn.5504.2012229
– volume: 11
  start-page: 333
  year: 2017
  ident: 1545_CR21
  publication-title: Front Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00333
– volume: 49
  start-page: 529
  year: 2011
  ident: 1545_CR45
  publication-title: Spinal Cord
  doi: 10.1038/SC.2010.158
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1968
  issue: 24
  year: 2015
  ident: 1545_CR17
  publication-title: J Neurotrauma
  doi: 10.1089/NEU.2015.4008
– volume: 26
  start-page: 388
  year: 2012
  ident: 1545_CR27
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968312438437
– volume: 39
  start-page: E176
  year: 2015
  ident: 1545_CR15
  publication-title: Artif Organs
  doi: 10.1111/AOR.12615
– volume: 67
  start-page: 206
  year: 1987
  ident: 1545_CR34
  publication-title: Phys Ther
  doi: 10.1093/PTJ/67.2.206
– year: 2020
  ident: 1545_CR22
  publication-title: Front Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/FNINS.2020.00416
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 1545_CR36
  publication-title: J Clin Med
  doi: 10.3390/JCM9103275
– ident: 1545_CR2
– year: 2021
  ident: 1545_CR26
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0260166
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1926
  year: 2007
  ident: 1545_CR39
  publication-title: Disabil Rehabil
  doi: 10.1080/09638280601046302
– volume: 18
  start-page: 106
  year: 2012
  ident: 1545_CR9
  publication-title: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil
  doi: 10.1310/SCI1802-106
– volume: 21
  start-page: 25
  year: 2007
  ident: 1545_CR46
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968306295556
– volume: 79
  start-page: 81
  year: 1998
  ident: 1545_CR57
  publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90213-1
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 1545_CR58
  publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil
  doi: 10.1186/S12984-017-0271-9/FIGURES/6
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1548
  year: 2012
  ident: 1545_CR3
  publication-title: J Neurotrauma
  doi: 10.1089/NEU.2011.2226
– volume: 34
  start-page: 3
  year: 2020
  ident: 1545_CR10
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968319893298
– volume: 15
  start-page: 732
  year: 2019
  ident: 1545_CR28
  publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol
  doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0280-3
– volume: 2
  start-page: 209
  year: 2010
  ident: 1545_CR42
  publication-title: PM R
  doi: 10.1016/J.PMRJ.2010.01.004
– volume: 45
  start-page: 190
  year: 2007
  ident: 1545_CR30
  publication-title: Spinal Cord
  doi: 10.1038/SJ.SC.3102007
– year: 2019
  ident: 1545_CR8
  publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil
  doi: 10.1186/S12984-019-0591-Z
– volume: 91
  start-page: 260
  year: 2021
  ident: 1545_CR5
  publication-title: J Clin Neurosci
  doi: 10.1016/J.JOCN.2021.07.019
– volume: 57
  start-page: 449
  year: 2019
  ident: 1545_CR61
  publication-title: Spinal Cord
  doi: 10.1038/S41393-019-0242-Z
– volume: 21
  start-page: 539
  year: 2007
  ident: 1545_CR40
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968307301880
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1421
  year: 1996
  ident: 1545_CR44
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1421::aid-sim266>3.0.co;2-h
– volume: 22
  start-page: 262
  year: 2016
  ident: 1545_CR7
  publication-title: CNS Neurosci Ther
  doi: 10.1111/cns.12530
– year: 2021
  ident: 1545_CR63
  publication-title: Front Physiol
  doi: 10.3389/FPHYS.2021.756200
– year: 2020
  ident: 1545_CR23
  publication-title: Spinal Cord Ser Cases
  doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-00359-1
– year: 2017
  ident: 1545_CR4
  publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil
  doi: 10.1186/S12984-017-0232-3
– volume: 86
  start-page: 190
  year: 2005
  ident: 1545_CR38
  publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  doi: 10.1016/J.APMR.2004.02.010
– volume-title: Statistical analysis with missing data
  year: 2020
  ident: 1545_CR43
– year: 2023
  ident: 1545_CR31
  publication-title: Biomedicines
  doi: 10.3390/BIOMEDICINES11020589
– volume: 49
  start-page: 373
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 1545_CR62
  publication-title: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
– volume: 27
  start-page: 42
  year: 2010
  ident: 1545_CR41
  publication-title: Clin Res Regul Aff
  doi: 10.3109/10601331003777444
– year: 2023
  ident: 1545_CR51
  publication-title: Bioengineering (Basel)
  doi: 10.3390/BIOENGINEERING10050528
– volume: 42
  start-page: 513
  year: 2010
  ident: 1545_CR1
  publication-title: J Rehabil Med
  doi: 10.2340/16501977-0525
– volume: 30
  start-page: 233
  year: 2016
  ident: 1545_CR19
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968315591706
– volume: 75
  start-page: 756
  year: 1994
  ident: 1545_CR47
  publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90131-7
– year: 2017
  ident: 1545_CR65
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0189734
– volume: 45
  start-page: 237
  year: 2023
  ident: 1545_CR12
  publication-title: Fisioterapia
  doi: 10.1016/J.FT.2023.06.001
– volume: 37
  start-page: 481
  year: 2020
  ident: 1545_CR53
  publication-title: J Neurotrauma
  doi: 10.1089/NEU.2019.6588
– volume: 12
  start-page: 69
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 1545_CR16
  publication-title: J Exerc Sci Physiother
– volume: 94
  start-page: 2844
  year: 2005
  ident: 1545_CR59
  publication-title: J Neurophysiol
  doi: 10.1152/JN.00532.2005
– year: 2018
  ident: 1545_CR11
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0192013
– year: 2018
  ident: 1545_CR49
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33123-5
– year: 2024
  ident: 1545_CR29
  publication-title: Front Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/FNINS.2024.1372222
– volume: 46
  start-page: 246
  year: 2008
  ident: 1545_CR60
  publication-title: Spinal Cord
  doi: 10.1038/SJ.SC.3102134
– volume: 60
  start-page: 491
  year: 2022
  ident: 1545_CR64
  publication-title: Spinal Cord
  doi: 10.1038/S41393-021-00734-1
– volume: 37
  start-page: 202
  year: 2014
  ident: 1545_CR24
  publication-title: J Spinal Cord Med
  doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000149
SSID ssj0034054
Score 2.3991518
Snippet Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies...
Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have...
Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies...
Abstract Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 15
SubjectTerms Adult
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Biomedicine
Body Weight
Care and treatment
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Double-Blind Method
Exercise therapy
Exercise Therapy - methods
Feasibility Studies
Female
Gait disorders
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation
Gait rehabilitation
Humans
Lokomat
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Motor function
Muscle Strength - physiology
Neurology
Neurosciences
Recovery of Function - physiology
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Medicine
Robotic-assisted gait training
Robotics - methods
Robots
Spinal cord injuries
Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology
Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation
Spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
Treadmills (Exercise equipment)
Treatment Outcome
Walking
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELbQHhAceJRXYUGDxOMA0SZx4jjcFsRqhQRCaFfam2XHNlvUJlXTCi1_mT_BjJNUzSItF25VY7eO883MN8nkG8ZeVKm23EkRGV9pTFAKjTbnZJRzb0xskKHqUOX7RRyfZp_O8rOdVl9UE9bJA3cbd4ARxCU4w2tpM-t0yUVuZeZL4WMKzuR94zIekqnOB3OkIdnwiowUBy1GNZlF1Lo1cIZIjsJQUOv_2yfvBKXLBZOXnpqGYHR0h93qWSQcdqu_y665esJu7mgLTtj1z_1T8wl7uSslDCedjgC8gm8jle4Ju_21v2jDmHvsd4hl1QYppGs2LbRL6qIFlLICOodF3_wLv1hgiu0s0H1dWDWmwZVFSMwJRRZMYy_gZ7gLG7WbZRBTt0BF7pbaHsHQqAJcfU4wbAER1KygJZFN0LWF73q2Bsre0fQuYFYDqUqQsvHajRY1q38gSt6BBttszNxFBnm0BTwL2yxmv_Bf--L8OX3sXwuF0LvkPjs9-njy4Tjq-0NEFXqSdaSlTxNeZciAfCGMTw0nxiMMkjqL2Eu49574kHSOC-nLxHlhfVxYlydeZvwB26ub2j1iUFgtEi08p3QXQapxWmYT_FGEa1oWU5YMcFFVf1loa-YqJFFSqA5iCiGmAsSUnLI32znLTjrkytHvCYXbkST7Hb5AY1C9Mah_GcOUvSYMK3JOuLxK9-9Y4EmSzJc6lMhwkeDzdMr2RyPRqVSjw88HK1B0iCrxAs4UxxShTPIizafsYWcV2zXzUlLVI86WI3sZndT4SD07D5rmSVKQwiluw9vBtFTvTdsrdu3x_9i1J-xG2rmGiMf7bG-92rinSDXX5lnwKn8A4zqBdw
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFLZgSAgeuJRbYaCDxOUBIuo4cRzexsQ0IYEQ2qS9WU5ss6I2qZpWaPxl_gTnuM7UDDSJtyqxU9v5zvF3Yvs7jL2oU2OFUzKpfG0wQCkM2pxTSS58VU0qZKgm7PL9Ig-Ps08n-UmUyaGzMNvr91zJdx3ORypLKOlqmO0TdZVdy7mQYWFW7vdeVyDxyPpDMf-sN5h4gj7_3154axq6uEXywjppmH4O7rBbkTfC3uZF32VXXDNiN7fUBEfs-ue4Tj5iL7fFg-FooxwAr-DbQJd7xG5_ja-pL3OP_Q6zV71G0ujadQfdgvJmAQWpgO5gHtN94YU5BtXOAn3JhWVbtdiyBKk44cZC1doz-Bm-uybdehHk0y3QtnZLiY6gT00Brjkl4HWAmGmX0JGsJpjGwnczXQHF62hsZzBtgHQkSMt45QaNmjY_EBfvwYBt19XMJRUyZwvYC9vOp7_wX-N2_Bn9jAdBIWQruc-ODz4e7R8mMSNEUqPvWCVG-ZSLOkPO4wtZ-bQSxHFkhTTOItq48N4TA1LOCal8yZ2X1k8K63LuVSYesJ2mbdwjBoU1khvpBQW4CEuD1TLL8aEI0LQsxoz3cNF1fC00NDMdwiYl9QZiGiGmA8S0GrM353UWG7GQS0t_IBSelySh73AB8a-j39BIoBxHg_FG2cw6UwqZW5X5UvoJcdMxe00Y1uSOsHm1iacqsJMk7KX3FHJapPQiHbPdQUl0I_Xg9vPeCjTdor13AWdaYFBQ8rxI8zF7uLGK8zaLUtE-R6ytBvYy6NTwTjM9DSrmnBekaYrD8LY3LR39Z3fJqD3-v-JP2I104wQSMdllO6vl2j1FGrmqngX_8QfshHIX
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39885542
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3161915725
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11780808
https://doaj.org/article/426e158afa8d4dea9365d84f96f01251
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZ2kRA8cCm3wqgOEpcHCDRx6rhICHXTyjRp0zQ2aW-WE9tbUZeMphWMv8yf4Bw3qZox7YGXtkrsxnG-c_wd2_kOY6-ySBtupQhSl2kMUBKNNmdl0OMuTbspMlTtd_nui53jePekd7LC6nRHVQeW14Z2lE_qeDL-8OvH5Rc0-M_e4KX4WOKYJeOAErN6RhDIVbaOI5OgYGwvXqwqcCQncf3izLX1GoOT1_D_11MvDVVXt1FeWUv1Q9TwPrtbcUsYzMHwgK3YvMXuLCkOttitvWotvcVeLwsMw9FcXQDewGFDu7vF7h1Uj7Iu85D98SNcNkNiaYtZCeUF5dYCCmQBXcZ5lRIMD5xj4G0N0GwvTIq0wJYFSNcJWwbSwlzCTz83G5SzCy-xboC2vhtKhgR1-gqw-RmBswTEVTGBkqQ3QecGTvVoChTTo0FewigH0pogveOpbTRqlH9H7HwCDaaYpWMbpMiuDeBdmOJ89BuvWm3ZH9PP6mVR8BlNHrHj4fbR1k5QZY0IMvQv00BLF4U8i5EXuUSkLko58SCRItUziMiQO-eIJUlruZCuH1onjOsmxvZCJ2P-mK3lRW6fMkiMFqEWjlMQjNDVWC02If4pgjjqJ20W1nBRWfVYqGvGyodWUqg5xBRCTHmIKdlm7xZ1LuaCIjeW3iQULkqSGLg_UExOVeVbFJIsG6JROS1NbKzuc9EzMnZ94brEX9vsLWFYkRFh8zJdvXmBN0niX2ogkfci7edRm200SqKryRqnX9ZWoOgU7c_zOFMcA4d-2EuiXps9mVvFos28L2kvJNaWDXtp3FTzTD4680rnYZiQ7il2w_vatFTtIm7otWf_f6Xn7HY0dwgB726wtelkZl8g7ZymHbaanCT4KYdfO2x9MNj9tovfm9v7B4d4dEtsdfyETsf7nL_ySY77
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFLagk7g8cCm3woCDBOwBIpo4TVzeCmIqZZsQdNLeLCe2t6I2qZpWaPxl_gTnuE7VDDSJtyqxUyf-zvF3kuPvMPYyj5TmRiRBZnOFAUqq0OaMCHrcZlk3Q4aqXJbvUTI8jkcnvRO_Kayqs93rT5LOUzuzFsm7ClcmEQdUftWt-4G4ynYEspG4xXYGg9H3Ue2BOZKQuN4g88-ejUXIafX_7ZG3lqSL6ZIXvpm6pWj_DrvlOSQM1pN-l10xRZvd3FIWbLNrh_6beZu92hYShvFaRQBew7eGRneb3f7qp6xuc4_9ditZvkICacpVBdWcamgBBayArmHmS3_hgRkG2EYDvdWFRZmVOLIAaTlhSENW6nP46d7BBtVq7qTUNVCKu6aiR1CXqQBTnBEIK0D8lAuoSGITVKHhVE2WQLE7Gt45TAogTQnSNV6axqAmxQ_EyHtQoMtVNjVBhjOtAe9Cl7PJL_xXn5o_pZ9-Uyi4yiX32fH-p_HHYeCrQwQ5-pFloISNQp7HyH9smmQ2yjjxnSRDSqcReSG31hIbEsbwRNh-aGyibTfVphdaEfMHrFWUhXnEINUqCVViOQW7CFGF3WId4kURrFE_7bCwhovM_bTQo5lKF0KJRK4hJhFi0kFMig57s-kzXwuHXNr6A6Fw05JEv92BcnEqvQ-RSKZMiMZjldCxNqrPk54Wse0ntks8tcP2CMOSXBMOL1d-hwXeJIl8yYFAfov0nkcdtttoiS4lb5x-UVuBpFOUh-dwJjkGCP2wl0a9Dnu4torNmHlfUM4j9hYNe2ncVPNMMTlziuZhmJK-KT6Gt7VpSe9Lq0ue2uP_a_6cXR-ODw_kweejL0_YjWjtEALe3WWt5WJlniK9XGbPvDf5A5OWenU
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFLZgSBM8cCm3woCDxOUBojVx4ri8jUE1btOENmlvlhPbW1GbVE0qNP4yf4JznGRqBprEW9XYrRN_5_g78fF3GHuRR9pwK0WQuVxjgJJqtDkrg4S7LBtlyFC1z_LdF3tH8efj5HjtFL_Pdu-2JJszDaTSVNTbC-MaE5diu8JVSsYBlWL1HCCQV9m1mJY-2q4Vu50v5khH4u6ozD_79ZYjr9r_t29eW5wuJk5e2D31i9LkNrvZsknYaab_DrtiiwG7saYxOGCb39rd8wF7uS4pDIeNngC8gu89te4Bu3XQTl7X5i777de0fIVU0parCqoFVdMCCl0BncS8LQKGX8wx1LYG6P0uLMusxJEFSNAJTQay0pzBT_82NqhWCy-qboCS3Q2VP4KuYAXY4pTgWAEiqVxCRWKboAsDJ3paA0XxaIJnMC2A1CVI4bi2vUFNix-IlnegwZSrbGaDDOfcAN6FKefTX_ivbZL-jD62x0PB1zC5x44mHw9394K2TkSQo0epAy1dFPI8RibkUpG5KOPEfESG5M4gBkPunCNwSGu5kG4cWieMG6XGJqGTMb_PNoqysA8ZpEaLUAvHKexFsGrsFpsQfxRhG43TIQs7uKi8nRZ6NDPlgykpVAMxhRBTHmJKDtmb8z6LRkLk0tbvCYXnLUn-239RLk9U600U0iobohk5LU1srB5zkRgZu7FwI2KsQ_aaMKzISeHwct2etcCbJLkvtSOR6SLR59GQbfVaonPJe5efd1ag6BJl5HmcKY6hwjhM0igZsgeNVZyPmY8lZT9ib9mzl95N9a8U01OvbR6GKSmd4mN425mWar1qdclTe_R_zZ-xzYMPE_X10_6Xx-x61PiDgI-22Ea9XNknyDPr7Kl3JX8AdoR9Sw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcutaneous+spinal+cord+stimulation+combined+with+robotic-assisted+body+weight-supported+treadmill+training+enhances+motor+score+and+gait+recovery+in+incomplete+spinal+cord+injury%3A+a+double-blind+randomized+controlled+clinical+trial&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neuroengineering+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Comino-Su%C3%A1rez%2C+Natalia&rft.au=Moreno%2C+Juan+C.&rft.au=Meg%C3%ADa-Garc%C3%ADa%2C+%C3%81lvaro&rft.au=del-Ama%2C+Antonio+J.&rft.date=2025-01-30&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft.volume=22&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12984-025-01545-8&rft.externalDocID=PMC11780808
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon