Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. Objective To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 15 - 16 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
30.01.2025
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1743-0003 1743-0003 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8 |
Cover
Abstract | Background
Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation.
Objective
To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants.
Methods
A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up.
Results
Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (− 0.97 mV) and the sham group (− 3.39 mV) at follow-up.
Conclusions
The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166). |
---|---|
AbstractList | Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation.BACKGROUNDAlthough transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation.To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants.OBJECTIVETo determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants.A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up.METHODSA randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up.Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up.RESULTSAlthough no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up.The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166).CONCLUSIONSThe outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166). Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. Objective To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. Methods A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Results Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up. Conclusions The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166). Keywords: Spinal cord injury, Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Lokomat, Robotic-assisted gait training, Motor function, Gait rehabilitation Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up. The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. Objective To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. Methods A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Results Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (− 0.97 mV) and the sham group (− 3.39 mV) at follow-up. Conclusions The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166). Abstract Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. Objective To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. Methods A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Results Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (− 0.97 mV) and the sham group (− 3.39 mV) at follow-up. Conclusions The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166). Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation. To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up. Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up. The outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166). |
ArticleNumber | 15 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Serrano-Muñoz, Diego Gómez-Soriano, Julio Moreno, Juan C. del-Ama, Antonio J. Alcobendas-Maestro, Mónica López-López, Esther Gil-Agudo, Ángel Megía-García, Álvaro Avendaño-Coy, Juan Comino-Suárez, Natalia |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Natalia surname: Comino-Suárez fullname: Comino-Suárez, Natalia organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio – sequence: 2 givenname: Juan C. surname: Moreno fullname: Moreno, Juan C. email: jc.moreno@csic.es organization: BioRobotics Group, Center for Automation and Robotics, CSIC-UPM, Spanish National Research Council, Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Function (HNP-SESCAM), Associated Unit of R&D&I to the CSIC – sequence: 3 givenname: Álvaro surname: Megía-García fullname: Megía-García, Álvaro organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha – sequence: 4 givenname: Antonio J. surname: del-Ama fullname: del-Ama, Antonio J. organization: Bioengineering Systems and Technologies Research Group, School of Science and Technology, Rey Juan Carlos University – sequence: 5 givenname: Diego surname: Serrano-Muñoz fullname: Serrano-Muñoz, Diego organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha – sequence: 6 givenname: Juan surname: Avendaño-Coy fullname: Avendaño-Coy, Juan organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha – sequence: 7 givenname: Ángel surname: Gil-Agudo fullname: Gil-Agudo, Ángel organization: Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Function (HNP-SESCAM), Associated Unit of R&D&I to the CSIC, Biomechanics and Technical Aids Unit, National Hospital for Paraplegics – sequence: 8 givenname: Mónica surname: Alcobendas-Maestro fullname: Alcobendas-Maestro, Mónica organization: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Hospital for Paraplegics – sequence: 9 givenname: Esther surname: López-López fullname: López-López, Esther organization: Department of Physical Therapy, National Hospital for Paraplegics – sequence: 10 givenname: Julio surname: Gómez-Soriano fullname: Gómez-Soriano, Julio organization: Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39885542$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9Ustu3SAQtapUzaP9gS4qpG66cQq2sXE3VRT1EalSN-kaYRh8ucJwCzjR7S_3J4rjpMqtqggkRsM5Z2bgnBZHzjsoitcEnxPC2veRVD1rSlzREhPa0JI9K05I19Qlxrg-ehQfF6cxbnPQYNq8KI7rnjFKm-qk-H0dhItyTsKBnyOKO-OERdIHhWIy02xFMt7lxDQYBwrdmrRBwQ8-GVmKGE1MOTt4tUe3YMZNKuO82_mwZFMAoSZjbY6EccaNCNxGOAkRTT75gGIuBEg4hUZhEgog_Q2EPTIu71xzZyHBQVPGbeew_4AEUn4eLJSDNZmep1B-Mr9yVeldCt7aJcx3RoqlvhH2ZfFcCxvh1f15Vvz4_On68mv57fuXq8uLb6WkBKdSMF2RWjako7prB10NNcYdawdMWzVoSWqtNe4JZgB1y3RPQLdK404BJZo19VlxteoqL7Z8F8wkwp57YfhdwoeRi5CfzwJvqhYIZUILphoFoq9bqlij-1ZjUlGStT6uWrt5mEBJyLMJeyB6eOPMho_-hhPSMZxXVnh3rxD8zxli4pOJEqxdf5zXpCU9oV1FM_TtCh1F7s047bOkXOD8glW0pXVdVxl1_h9UXgomkx8ftMn5A8KbxzP8bf7BhRnAVoAMPsYAmkuT7ny3-MZygvlieL4anmfD8zvD82W66h_qg_qTpHolxQx2IwS-9XPIFotPsf4AbOcaVA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2025_e42597 |
Cites_doi | 10.1038/s41393-018-0063-5 10.1515/BMT-2013-4014/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS 10.1038/SC.2017.31 10.3390/JCM10153278 10.1016/J.PMR.2020.03.005 10.3390/JCM10061167 10.1089/NEU.2018.5956 10.1080/10790268.2021.2000200 10.3390/BRAINSCI11040472 10.1002/MUS.20700 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2834339 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3049133 10.1212/WNL.54.8.1574 10.1016/J.MEDCLI.2010.09.034 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2374-19.2020 10.33588/rn.5504.2012229 10.3389/fnins.2017.00333 10.1038/SC.2010.158 10.1089/NEU.2015.4008 10.1177/1545968312438437 10.1111/AOR.12615 10.1093/PTJ/67.2.206 10.3389/FNINS.2020.00416 10.3390/JCM9103275 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0260166 10.1080/09638280601046302 10.1310/SCI1802-106 10.1177/1545968306295556 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90213-1 10.1186/S12984-017-0271-9/FIGURES/6 10.1089/NEU.2011.2226 10.1177/1545968319893298 10.1038/s41582-019-0280-3 10.1016/J.PMRJ.2010.01.004 10.1038/SJ.SC.3102007 10.1186/S12984-019-0591-Z 10.1016/J.JOCN.2021.07.019 10.1038/S41393-019-0242-Z 10.1177/1545968307301880 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1421::aid-sim266>3.0.co;2-h 10.1111/cns.12530 10.3389/FPHYS.2021.756200 10.1038/s41394-020-00359-1 10.1186/S12984-017-0232-3 10.1016/J.APMR.2004.02.010 10.3390/BIOMEDICINES11020589 10.3109/10601331003777444 10.3390/BIOENGINEERING10050528 10.2340/16501977-0525 10.1177/1545968315591706 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90131-7 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0189734 10.1016/J.FT.2023.06.001 10.1089/NEU.2019.6588 10.1152/JN.00532.2005 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0192013 10.1038/s41598-018-33123-5 10.3389/FNINS.2024.1372222 10.1038/SJ.SC.3102134 10.1038/S41393-021-00734-1 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000149 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2025 2025. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2025 – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Engineering Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation Physical Therapy |
EISSN | 1743-0003 |
EndPage | 16 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_426e158afa8d4dea9365d84f96f01251 PMC11780808 A825653332 39885542 10_1186_s12984_025_01545_8 |
Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Spain |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Spain |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC) |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29L 2QV 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 7RV 7X7 88E 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE I-F IAO IHR INH INR IPY ITC KQ8 L6V LK8 M0T M1P M48 M7P M7S ML0 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW XSB ~8M AAYXX ALIPV CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-a8f213c4175f76bf2b300786b056dbfc13fff09108ee368f91ef6df07de51f843 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1743-0003 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:17:41 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:38:11 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 18:07:00 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:01:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:01:19 EDT 2025 Sun Jun 29 01:31:17 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:20:03 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:30 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:18:51 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Robotic-assisted gait training Gait rehabilitation Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation Lokomat Spinal cord injury Motor function |
Language | English |
License | 2025. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c510t-a8f213c4175f76bf2b300786b056dbfc13fff09108ee368f91ef6df07de51f843 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8 |
PMID | 39885542 |
PQID | 3161915725 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_426e158afa8d4dea9365d84f96f01251 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11780808 proquest_miscellaneous_3161915725 gale_infotracmisc_A825653332 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A825653332 pubmed_primary_39885542 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12984_025_01545_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_025_01545_8 springer_journals_10_1186_s12984_025_01545_8 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-01-30 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-01-30 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2025 text: 2025-01-30 day: 30 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | J NeuroEngineering Rehabil |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neuroeng Rehabil |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
References | F Inanici (1545_CR48) 2018; 26 K Minassian (1545_CR7) 2016; 22 F Inanici (1545_CR54) 2021; 29 JA Petersen (1545_CR27) 2012; 26 RW Bohannon (1545_CR34) 1987; 67 A Curt (1545_CR57) 1998; 79 M Itzkovich (1545_CR39) 2007; 29 K Minassian (1545_CR13) 2007; 35 D Serrano-Muñoz (1545_CR65) 2017 US Hofstoetter (1545_CR24) 2014; 37 RJA Little (1545_CR43) 2020 K Minassian (1545_CR19) 2016; 30 KE James (1545_CR44) 1996; 15 KY Nam (1545_CR4) 2017 A Megía García (1545_CR10) 2020; 34 L García-Alén (1545_CR31) 2023 S Estes (1545_CR20) 2021; 10 1545_CR2 US Hofstoetter (1545_CR11) 2018 H Bang (1545_CR41) 2010; 27 S Tajali (1545_CR29) 2024 RH De Paz (1545_CR8) 2019 CY Fang (1545_CR63) 2021 US Hofstoetter (1545_CR15) 2015; 39 1545_CR32 FD Benavides (1545_CR56) 2020; 40 P Gad (1545_CR21) 2017; 11 J Gómez-Soriano (1545_CR12) 2023; 45 US Hofstoetter (1545_CR50) 2021 US Hofstoetter (1545_CR14) 2013 HJ Van Hedel (1545_CR38) 2005; 86 N Aravind (1545_CR61) 2019; 57 C Taylor (1545_CR26) 2021 KL Sainani (1545_CR42) 2010; 2 US Hofstoetter (1545_CR53) 2020; 37 AR Alashram (1545_CR25) 2023; 46 LP Hiersemenzel (1545_CR52) 2000; 54 J Benito (1545_CR9) 2012; 18 J Gómez-Soriano (1545_CR55) 2012; 55 JF Ditunno (1545_CR40) 2007; 21 G Scivoletto (1545_CR62) 2013; 49 RL Waters (1545_CR47) 1994; 75 JM Hope (1545_CR51) 2023 TH Hutson (1545_CR28) 2019; 15 JW Fawcett (1545_CR30) 2007; 45 A Cobos-Carbó (1545_CR33) 2011; 137 Y Freyvert (1545_CR49) 2018 LA Simpson (1545_CR3) 2012; 29 J Mehrholz (1545_CR6) 2017; 55 SL Thomas (1545_CR59) 2005; 94 EA Bye (1545_CR64) 2022; 60 JC Shin (1545_CR45) 2011; 49 EY Shapkova (1545_CR22) 2020 LV McHugh (1545_CR23) 2020 DG Sayenko (1545_CR18) 2019; 36 T Lam (1545_CR60) 2008; 46 H Kumru (1545_CR66) 2021 YP Gerasimenko (1545_CR17) 2015; 32 AR Alashram (1545_CR5) 2021; 91 PB Mills (1545_CR35) 2018; 56 B Dobkin (1545_CR46) 2007; 21 PK Bedi (1545_CR16) 2016; 12 S Kirshblum (1545_CR37) 2020; 31 M Wessels (1545_CR1) 2010; 42 Á Megía-García (1545_CR36) 2020; 9 E Bravo-Esteban (1545_CR58) 2017; 14 |
References_xml | – volume: 56 start-page: 569 year: 2018 ident: 1545_CR35 publication-title: Spinal Cord doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0063-5 – year: 2013 ident: 1545_CR14 publication-title: Biomed Tech (Berl) doi: 10.1515/BMT-2013-4014/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS – volume: 55 start-page: 722 year: 2017 ident: 1545_CR6 publication-title: Spinal Cord doi: 10.1038/SC.2017.31 – year: 2021 ident: 1545_CR66 publication-title: J Clin Med doi: 10.3390/JCM10153278 – volume: 31 start-page: 319 year: 2020 ident: 1545_CR37 publication-title: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am doi: 10.1016/J.PMR.2020.03.005 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2021 ident: 1545_CR20 publication-title: J Clin Med doi: 10.3390/JCM10061167 – volume: 36 start-page: 1435 year: 2019 ident: 1545_CR18 publication-title: J Neurotrauma doi: 10.1089/NEU.2018.5956 – volume: 46 start-page: 582 year: 2023 ident: 1545_CR25 publication-title: J Spinal Cord Med doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.2000200 – year: 2021 ident: 1545_CR50 publication-title: Brain Sci doi: 10.3390/BRAINSCI11040472 – volume: 35 start-page: 327 year: 2007 ident: 1545_CR13 publication-title: Muscle Nerve doi: 10.1002/MUS.20700 – ident: 1545_CR32 – volume: 26 start-page: 1272 year: 2018 ident: 1545_CR48 publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2834339 – volume: 29 start-page: 310 year: 2021 ident: 1545_CR54 publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3049133 – volume: 54 start-page: 1574 year: 2000 ident: 1545_CR52 publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/WNL.54.8.1574 – volume: 137 start-page: 213 year: 2011 ident: 1545_CR33 publication-title: Med Clin (Barc) doi: 10.1016/J.MEDCLI.2010.09.034 – volume: 40 start-page: 2633 year: 2020 ident: 1545_CR56 publication-title: J Neurosci doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2374-19.2020 – volume: 55 start-page: 217 year: 2012 ident: 1545_CR55 publication-title: Rev Neurol doi: 10.33588/rn.5504.2012229 – volume: 11 start-page: 333 year: 2017 ident: 1545_CR21 publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00333 – volume: 49 start-page: 529 year: 2011 ident: 1545_CR45 publication-title: Spinal Cord doi: 10.1038/SC.2010.158 – volume: 32 start-page: 1968 issue: 24 year: 2015 ident: 1545_CR17 publication-title: J Neurotrauma doi: 10.1089/NEU.2015.4008 – volume: 26 start-page: 388 year: 2012 ident: 1545_CR27 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968312438437 – volume: 39 start-page: E176 year: 2015 ident: 1545_CR15 publication-title: Artif Organs doi: 10.1111/AOR.12615 – volume: 67 start-page: 206 year: 1987 ident: 1545_CR34 publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/PTJ/67.2.206 – year: 2020 ident: 1545_CR22 publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/FNINS.2020.00416 – volume: 9 start-page: 1 year: 2020 ident: 1545_CR36 publication-title: J Clin Med doi: 10.3390/JCM9103275 – ident: 1545_CR2 – year: 2021 ident: 1545_CR26 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0260166 – volume: 29 start-page: 1926 year: 2007 ident: 1545_CR39 publication-title: Disabil Rehabil doi: 10.1080/09638280601046302 – volume: 18 start-page: 106 year: 2012 ident: 1545_CR9 publication-title: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil doi: 10.1310/SCI1802-106 – volume: 21 start-page: 25 year: 2007 ident: 1545_CR46 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968306295556 – volume: 79 start-page: 81 year: 1998 ident: 1545_CR57 publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90213-1 – volume: 14 start-page: 1 year: 2017 ident: 1545_CR58 publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil doi: 10.1186/S12984-017-0271-9/FIGURES/6 – volume: 29 start-page: 1548 year: 2012 ident: 1545_CR3 publication-title: J Neurotrauma doi: 10.1089/NEU.2011.2226 – volume: 34 start-page: 3 year: 2020 ident: 1545_CR10 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968319893298 – volume: 15 start-page: 732 year: 2019 ident: 1545_CR28 publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0280-3 – volume: 2 start-page: 209 year: 2010 ident: 1545_CR42 publication-title: PM R doi: 10.1016/J.PMRJ.2010.01.004 – volume: 45 start-page: 190 year: 2007 ident: 1545_CR30 publication-title: Spinal Cord doi: 10.1038/SJ.SC.3102007 – year: 2019 ident: 1545_CR8 publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil doi: 10.1186/S12984-019-0591-Z – volume: 91 start-page: 260 year: 2021 ident: 1545_CR5 publication-title: J Clin Neurosci doi: 10.1016/J.JOCN.2021.07.019 – volume: 57 start-page: 449 year: 2019 ident: 1545_CR61 publication-title: Spinal Cord doi: 10.1038/S41393-019-0242-Z – volume: 21 start-page: 539 year: 2007 ident: 1545_CR40 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968307301880 – volume: 15 start-page: 1421 year: 1996 ident: 1545_CR44 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1421::aid-sim266>3.0.co;2-h – volume: 22 start-page: 262 year: 2016 ident: 1545_CR7 publication-title: CNS Neurosci Ther doi: 10.1111/cns.12530 – year: 2021 ident: 1545_CR63 publication-title: Front Physiol doi: 10.3389/FPHYS.2021.756200 – year: 2020 ident: 1545_CR23 publication-title: Spinal Cord Ser Cases doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-00359-1 – year: 2017 ident: 1545_CR4 publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil doi: 10.1186/S12984-017-0232-3 – volume: 86 start-page: 190 year: 2005 ident: 1545_CR38 publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/J.APMR.2004.02.010 – volume-title: Statistical analysis with missing data year: 2020 ident: 1545_CR43 – year: 2023 ident: 1545_CR31 publication-title: Biomedicines doi: 10.3390/BIOMEDICINES11020589 – volume: 49 start-page: 373 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 1545_CR62 publication-title: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med – volume: 27 start-page: 42 year: 2010 ident: 1545_CR41 publication-title: Clin Res Regul Aff doi: 10.3109/10601331003777444 – year: 2023 ident: 1545_CR51 publication-title: Bioengineering (Basel) doi: 10.3390/BIOENGINEERING10050528 – volume: 42 start-page: 513 year: 2010 ident: 1545_CR1 publication-title: J Rehabil Med doi: 10.2340/16501977-0525 – volume: 30 start-page: 233 year: 2016 ident: 1545_CR19 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968315591706 – volume: 75 start-page: 756 year: 1994 ident: 1545_CR47 publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90131-7 – year: 2017 ident: 1545_CR65 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0189734 – volume: 45 start-page: 237 year: 2023 ident: 1545_CR12 publication-title: Fisioterapia doi: 10.1016/J.FT.2023.06.001 – volume: 37 start-page: 481 year: 2020 ident: 1545_CR53 publication-title: J Neurotrauma doi: 10.1089/NEU.2019.6588 – volume: 12 start-page: 69 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 1545_CR16 publication-title: J Exerc Sci Physiother – volume: 94 start-page: 2844 year: 2005 ident: 1545_CR59 publication-title: J Neurophysiol doi: 10.1152/JN.00532.2005 – year: 2018 ident: 1545_CR11 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0192013 – year: 2018 ident: 1545_CR49 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33123-5 – year: 2024 ident: 1545_CR29 publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/FNINS.2024.1372222 – volume: 46 start-page: 246 year: 2008 ident: 1545_CR60 publication-title: Spinal Cord doi: 10.1038/SJ.SC.3102134 – volume: 60 start-page: 491 year: 2022 ident: 1545_CR64 publication-title: Spinal Cord doi: 10.1038/S41393-021-00734-1 – volume: 37 start-page: 202 year: 2014 ident: 1545_CR24 publication-title: J Spinal Cord Med doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000149 |
SSID | ssj0034054 |
Score | 2.3991518 |
Snippet | Background
Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies... Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have... Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies... Abstract Background Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 15 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Biomedicine Body Weight Care and treatment Clinical trials Comparative analysis Double-Blind Method Exercise therapy Exercise Therapy - methods Feasibility Studies Female Gait disorders Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation Gait rehabilitation Humans Lokomat Male Methods Middle Aged Motor function Muscle Strength - physiology Neurology Neurosciences Recovery of Function - physiology Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Medicine Robotic-assisted gait training Robotics - methods Robots Spinal cord injuries Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation Spinal cord injury Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation Treadmills (Exercise equipment) Treatment Outcome Walking |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELbQHhAceJRXYUGDxOMA0SZx4jjcFsRqhQRCaFfam2XHNlvUJlXTCi1_mT_BjJNUzSItF25VY7eO883MN8nkG8ZeVKm23EkRGV9pTFAKjTbnZJRzb0xskKHqUOX7RRyfZp_O8rOdVl9UE9bJA3cbd4ARxCU4w2tpM-t0yUVuZeZL4WMKzuR94zIekqnOB3OkIdnwiowUBy1GNZlF1Lo1cIZIjsJQUOv_2yfvBKXLBZOXnpqGYHR0h93qWSQcdqu_y665esJu7mgLTtj1z_1T8wl7uSslDCedjgC8gm8jle4Ju_21v2jDmHvsd4hl1QYppGs2LbRL6qIFlLICOodF3_wLv1hgiu0s0H1dWDWmwZVFSMwJRRZMYy_gZ7gLG7WbZRBTt0BF7pbaHsHQqAJcfU4wbAER1KygJZFN0LWF73q2Bsre0fQuYFYDqUqQsvHajRY1q38gSt6BBttszNxFBnm0BTwL2yxmv_Bf--L8OX3sXwuF0LvkPjs9-njy4Tjq-0NEFXqSdaSlTxNeZciAfCGMTw0nxiMMkjqL2Eu49574kHSOC-nLxHlhfVxYlydeZvwB26ub2j1iUFgtEi08p3QXQapxWmYT_FGEa1oWU5YMcFFVf1loa-YqJFFSqA5iCiGmAsSUnLI32znLTjrkytHvCYXbkST7Hb5AY1C9Mah_GcOUvSYMK3JOuLxK9-9Y4EmSzJc6lMhwkeDzdMr2RyPRqVSjw88HK1B0iCrxAs4UxxShTPIizafsYWcV2zXzUlLVI86WI3sZndT4SD07D5rmSVKQwiluw9vBtFTvTdsrdu3x_9i1J-xG2rmGiMf7bG-92rinSDXX5lnwKn8A4zqBdw priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFLZgSAgeuJRbYaCDxOUBIuo4cRzexsQ0IYEQ2qS9WU5ss6I2qZpWaPxl_gTnuM7UDDSJtyqxU9v5zvF3Yvs7jL2oU2OFUzKpfG0wQCkM2pxTSS58VU0qZKgm7PL9Ig-Ps08n-UmUyaGzMNvr91zJdx3ORypLKOlqmO0TdZVdy7mQYWFW7vdeVyDxyPpDMf-sN5h4gj7_3154axq6uEXywjppmH4O7rBbkTfC3uZF32VXXDNiN7fUBEfs-ue4Tj5iL7fFg-FooxwAr-DbQJd7xG5_ja-pL3OP_Q6zV71G0ujadQfdgvJmAQWpgO5gHtN94YU5BtXOAn3JhWVbtdiyBKk44cZC1doz-Bm-uybdehHk0y3QtnZLiY6gT00Brjkl4HWAmGmX0JGsJpjGwnczXQHF62hsZzBtgHQkSMt45QaNmjY_EBfvwYBt19XMJRUyZwvYC9vOp7_wX-N2_Bn9jAdBIWQruc-ODz4e7R8mMSNEUqPvWCVG-ZSLOkPO4wtZ-bQSxHFkhTTOItq48N4TA1LOCal8yZ2X1k8K63LuVSYesJ2mbdwjBoU1khvpBQW4CEuD1TLL8aEI0LQsxoz3cNF1fC00NDMdwiYl9QZiGiGmA8S0GrM353UWG7GQS0t_IBSelySh73AB8a-j39BIoBxHg_FG2cw6UwqZW5X5UvoJcdMxe00Y1uSOsHm1iacqsJMk7KX3FHJapPQiHbPdQUl0I_Xg9vPeCjTdor13AWdaYFBQ8rxI8zF7uLGK8zaLUtE-R6ytBvYy6NTwTjM9DSrmnBekaYrD8LY3LR39Z3fJqD3-v-JP2I104wQSMdllO6vl2j1FGrmqngX_8QfshHIX priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39885542 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3161915725 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11780808 https://doaj.org/article/426e158afa8d4dea9365d84f96f01251 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZ2kRA8cCm3wqgOEpcHCDRx6rhICHXTyjRp0zQ2aW-WE9tbUZeMphWMv8yf4Bw3qZox7YGXtkrsxnG-c_wd2_kOY6-ySBtupQhSl2kMUBKNNmdl0OMuTbspMlTtd_nui53jePekd7LC6nRHVQeW14Z2lE_qeDL-8OvH5Rc0-M_e4KX4WOKYJeOAErN6RhDIVbaOI5OgYGwvXqwqcCQncf3izLX1GoOT1_D_11MvDVVXt1FeWUv1Q9TwPrtbcUsYzMHwgK3YvMXuLCkOttitvWotvcVeLwsMw9FcXQDewGFDu7vF7h1Uj7Iu85D98SNcNkNiaYtZCeUF5dYCCmQBXcZ5lRIMD5xj4G0N0GwvTIq0wJYFSNcJWwbSwlzCTz83G5SzCy-xboC2vhtKhgR1-gqw-RmBswTEVTGBkqQ3QecGTvVoChTTo0FewigH0pogveOpbTRqlH9H7HwCDaaYpWMbpMiuDeBdmOJ89BuvWm3ZH9PP6mVR8BlNHrHj4fbR1k5QZY0IMvQv00BLF4U8i5EXuUSkLko58SCRItUziMiQO-eIJUlruZCuH1onjOsmxvZCJ2P-mK3lRW6fMkiMFqEWjlMQjNDVWC02If4pgjjqJ20W1nBRWfVYqGvGyodWUqg5xBRCTHmIKdlm7xZ1LuaCIjeW3iQULkqSGLg_UExOVeVbFJIsG6JROS1NbKzuc9EzMnZ94brEX9vsLWFYkRFh8zJdvXmBN0niX2ogkfci7edRm200SqKryRqnX9ZWoOgU7c_zOFMcA4d-2EuiXps9mVvFos28L2kvJNaWDXtp3FTzTD4680rnYZiQ7il2w_vatFTtIm7otWf_f6Xn7HY0dwgB726wtelkZl8g7ZymHbaanCT4KYdfO2x9MNj9tovfm9v7B4d4dEtsdfyETsf7nL_ySY77 |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFLagk7g8cCm3woCDBOwBIpo4TVzeCmIqZZsQdNLeLCe2t6I2qZpWaPxl_gTnuE7VDDSJtyqxUyf-zvF3kuPvMPYyj5TmRiRBZnOFAUqq0OaMCHrcZlk3Q4aqXJbvUTI8jkcnvRO_Kayqs93rT5LOUzuzFsm7ClcmEQdUftWt-4G4ynYEspG4xXYGg9H3Ue2BOZKQuN4g88-ejUXIafX_7ZG3lqSL6ZIXvpm6pWj_DrvlOSQM1pN-l10xRZvd3FIWbLNrh_6beZu92hYShvFaRQBew7eGRneb3f7qp6xuc4_9ditZvkICacpVBdWcamgBBayArmHmS3_hgRkG2EYDvdWFRZmVOLIAaTlhSENW6nP46d7BBtVq7qTUNVCKu6aiR1CXqQBTnBEIK0D8lAuoSGITVKHhVE2WQLE7Gt45TAogTQnSNV6axqAmxQ_EyHtQoMtVNjVBhjOtAe9Cl7PJL_xXn5o_pZ9-Uyi4yiX32fH-p_HHYeCrQwQ5-pFloISNQp7HyH9smmQ2yjjxnSRDSqcReSG31hIbEsbwRNh-aGyibTfVphdaEfMHrFWUhXnEINUqCVViOQW7CFGF3WId4kURrFE_7bCwhovM_bTQo5lKF0KJRK4hJhFi0kFMig57s-kzXwuHXNr6A6Fw05JEv92BcnEqvQ-RSKZMiMZjldCxNqrPk54Wse0ntks8tcP2CMOSXBMOL1d-hwXeJIl8yYFAfov0nkcdtttoiS4lb5x-UVuBpFOUh-dwJjkGCP2wl0a9Dnu4torNmHlfUM4j9hYNe2ncVPNMMTlziuZhmJK-KT6Gt7VpSe9Lq0ue2uP_a_6cXR-ODw_kweejL0_YjWjtEALe3WWt5WJlniK9XGbPvDf5A5OWenU |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFLZgSBM8cCm3woCDxOUBojVx4ri8jUE1btOENmlvlhPbW1GbVE0qNP4yf4JznGRqBprEW9XYrRN_5_g78fF3GHuRR9pwK0WQuVxjgJJqtDkrg4S7LBtlyFC1z_LdF3tH8efj5HjtFL_Pdu-2JJszDaTSVNTbC-MaE5diu8JVSsYBlWL1HCCQV9m1mJY-2q4Vu50v5khH4u6ozD_79ZYjr9r_t29eW5wuJk5e2D31i9LkNrvZsknYaab_DrtiiwG7saYxOGCb39rd8wF7uS4pDIeNngC8gu89te4Bu3XQTl7X5i777de0fIVU0parCqoFVdMCCl0BncS8LQKGX8wx1LYG6P0uLMusxJEFSNAJTQay0pzBT_82NqhWCy-qboCS3Q2VP4KuYAXY4pTgWAEiqVxCRWKboAsDJ3paA0XxaIJnMC2A1CVI4bi2vUFNix-IlnegwZSrbGaDDOfcAN6FKefTX_ivbZL-jD62x0PB1zC5x44mHw9394K2TkSQo0epAy1dFPI8RibkUpG5KOPEfESG5M4gBkPunCNwSGu5kG4cWieMG6XGJqGTMb_PNoqysA8ZpEaLUAvHKexFsGrsFpsQfxRhG43TIQs7uKi8nRZ6NDPlgykpVAMxhRBTHmJKDtmb8z6LRkLk0tbvCYXnLUn-239RLk9U600U0iobohk5LU1srB5zkRgZu7FwI2KsQ_aaMKzISeHwct2etcCbJLkvtSOR6SLR59GQbfVaonPJe5efd1ag6BJl5HmcKY6hwjhM0igZsgeNVZyPmY8lZT9ib9mzl95N9a8U01OvbR6GKSmd4mN425mWar1qdclTe_R_zZ-xzYMPE_X10_6Xx-x61PiDgI-22Ea9XNknyDPr7Kl3JX8AdoR9Sw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcutaneous+spinal+cord+stimulation+combined+with+robotic-assisted+body+weight-supported+treadmill+training+enhances+motor+score+and+gait+recovery+in+incomplete+spinal+cord+injury%3A+a+double-blind+randomized+controlled+clinical+trial&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neuroengineering+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Comino-Su%C3%A1rez%2C+Natalia&rft.au=Moreno%2C+Juan+C.&rft.au=Meg%C3%ADa-Garc%C3%ADa%2C+%C3%81lvaro&rft.au=del-Ama%2C+Antonio+J.&rft.date=2025-01-30&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft.volume=22&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12984-025-01545-8&rft.externalDocID=PMC11780808 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |