Navigating life after gastric cancer surgery: a qualitative exploration of the dyadic patient-caregiver perspective on quality of life outcomes
Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment pro...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC cancer Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 288 - 27 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
18.02.2025
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment process. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing QoL of GC patients and their family caregivers, to compare the interactions and similarities and differences between the two influences, and to construct a conceptual model of the influences on QoL of GC patients and their caregivers based on the results of the study.
This descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 at two branches of a tertiary hospital in China, and participants were recruited by adopting a purposive sampling approach, where participants were patients with GC who met the criteria recommended by gastrointestinal surgeons and nurses, and caregivers were designated by patients. The sample was selected considering maximum differentiation, such as age, gender, cancer stage, and disease duration of the respondents. The sample size was based on data saturation with no new themes emerging. Based on the results of the pre-interviews, we made some adjustments to the interview format, i.e., interviewing some informants individually and others jointly. We used semi-structured interviews for data collection for the qualitative study, where participants were informed about the study, their roles, the risks and benefits of the study, and signed an informed consent form before the interviews began. In addition, the quality of field notes was assessed after each session. The process was the same for all interviews. To ensure the accuracy of the information, all information transmitted on paper was reviewed while listening to the recorded voice. We used directed content analysis to analyze the content of the interviews.
A total of 30 patients and 26 caregivers were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the study, which were contextual factors (disease-specific factors, physical and social environments and individual and family characteristics), knowledge and belief factors (self symptom assessment and healthcare seeking behavior, health information delivery and accessibility, life priority adjustment), self-regulation factors (strategies for health behavior change, role adaptation and emotion regulation) and social facilitators (positive motivation and emotional support from family, friends, and society, missing companionship and challenges encountered by family and friends visiting the patient after surgery, caregiving burdens and challenges). In addition, the study confirmed a high correlation between the QoL of patients and caregivers.
Our results address past gaps in the understanding of QoL for families with GC and update the concept of QoL by constructing a conceptual model of the factors that influence QoL for GC survivors and caregivers, as well as outlining the changes needed to improve health outcomes and QoL for survivors and their caregivers. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Introduction Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment process. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing QoL of GC patients and their family caregivers, to compare the interactions and similarities and differences between the two influences, and to construct a conceptual model of the influences on QoL of GC patients and their caregivers based on the results of the study. Methods This descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 at two branches of a tertiary hospital in China, and participants were recruited by adopting a purposive sampling approach, where participants were patients with GC who met the criteria recommended by gastrointestinal surgeons and nurses, and caregivers were designated by patients. The sample was selected considering maximum differentiation, such as age, gender, cancer stage, and disease duration of the respondents. The sample size was based on data saturation with no new themes emerging. Based on the results of the pre-interviews, we made some adjustments to the interview format, i.e., interviewing some informants individually and others jointly. We used semi-structured interviews for data collection for the qualitative study, where participants were informed about the study, their roles, the risks and benefits of the study, and signed an informed consent form before the interviews began. In addition, the quality of field notes was assessed after each session. The process was the same for all interviews. To ensure the accuracy of the information, all information transmitted on paper was reviewed while listening to the recorded voice. We used directed content analysis to analyze the content of the interviews. Results A total of 30 patients and 26 caregivers were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the study, which were contextual factors (disease-specific factors, physical and social environments and individual and family characteristics), knowledge and belief factors (self symptom assessment and healthcare seeking behavior, health information delivery and accessibility, life priority adjustment), self-regulation factors (strategies for health behavior change, role adaptation and emotion regulation) and social facilitators (positive motivation and emotional support from family, friends, and society, missing companionship and challenges encountered by family and friends visiting the patient after surgery, caregiving burdens and challenges). In addition, the study confirmed a high correlation between the QoL of patients and caregivers. Conclusion Our results address past gaps in the understanding of QoL for families with GC and update the concept of QoL by constructing a conceptual model of the factors that influence QoL for GC survivors and caregivers, as well as outlining the changes needed to improve health outcomes and QoL for survivors and their caregivers. Keywords: Gastric cancer, Family caregiver, Quality of life, Health promotion, Qualitative study, Dyadic perspective Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment process. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing QoL of GC patients and their family caregivers, to compare the interactions and similarities and differences between the two influences, and to construct a conceptual model of the influences on QoL of GC patients and their caregivers based on the results of the study.INTRODUCTIONGastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment process. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing QoL of GC patients and their family caregivers, to compare the interactions and similarities and differences between the two influences, and to construct a conceptual model of the influences on QoL of GC patients and their caregivers based on the results of the study.This descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 at two branches of a tertiary hospital in China, and participants were recruited by adopting a purposive sampling approach, where participants were patients with GC who met the criteria recommended by gastrointestinal surgeons and nurses, and caregivers were designated by patients. The sample was selected considering maximum differentiation, such as age, gender, cancer stage, and disease duration of the respondents. The sample size was based on data saturation with no new themes emerging. Based on the results of the pre-interviews, we made some adjustments to the interview format, i.e., interviewing some informants individually and others jointly. We used semi-structured interviews for data collection for the qualitative study, where participants were informed about the study, their roles, the risks and benefits of the study, and signed an informed consent form before the interviews began. In addition, the quality of field notes was assessed after each session. The process was the same for all interviews. To ensure the accuracy of the information, all information transmitted on paper was reviewed while listening to the recorded voice. We used directed content analysis to analyze the content of the interviews.METHODSThis descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 at two branches of a tertiary hospital in China, and participants were recruited by adopting a purposive sampling approach, where participants were patients with GC who met the criteria recommended by gastrointestinal surgeons and nurses, and caregivers were designated by patients. The sample was selected considering maximum differentiation, such as age, gender, cancer stage, and disease duration of the respondents. The sample size was based on data saturation with no new themes emerging. Based on the results of the pre-interviews, we made some adjustments to the interview format, i.e., interviewing some informants individually and others jointly. We used semi-structured interviews for data collection for the qualitative study, where participants were informed about the study, their roles, the risks and benefits of the study, and signed an informed consent form before the interviews began. In addition, the quality of field notes was assessed after each session. The process was the same for all interviews. To ensure the accuracy of the information, all information transmitted on paper was reviewed while listening to the recorded voice. We used directed content analysis to analyze the content of the interviews.A total of 30 patients and 26 caregivers were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the study, which were contextual factors (disease-specific factors, physical and social environments and individual and family characteristics), knowledge and belief factors (self symptom assessment and healthcare seeking behavior, health information delivery and accessibility, life priority adjustment), self-regulation factors (strategies for health behavior change, role adaptation and emotion regulation) and social facilitators (positive motivation and emotional support from family, friends, and society, missing companionship and challenges encountered by family and friends visiting the patient after surgery, caregiving burdens and challenges). In addition, the study confirmed a high correlation between the QoL of patients and caregivers.RESULTSA total of 30 patients and 26 caregivers were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the study, which were contextual factors (disease-specific factors, physical and social environments and individual and family characteristics), knowledge and belief factors (self symptom assessment and healthcare seeking behavior, health information delivery and accessibility, life priority adjustment), self-regulation factors (strategies for health behavior change, role adaptation and emotion regulation) and social facilitators (positive motivation and emotional support from family, friends, and society, missing companionship and challenges encountered by family and friends visiting the patient after surgery, caregiving burdens and challenges). In addition, the study confirmed a high correlation between the QoL of patients and caregivers.Our results address past gaps in the understanding of QoL for families with GC and update the concept of QoL by constructing a conceptual model of the factors that influence QoL for GC survivors and caregivers, as well as outlining the changes needed to improve health outcomes and QoL for survivors and their caregivers.CONCLUSIONOur results address past gaps in the understanding of QoL for families with GC and update the concept of QoL by constructing a conceptual model of the factors that influence QoL for GC survivors and caregivers, as well as outlining the changes needed to improve health outcomes and QoL for survivors and their caregivers. IntroductionGastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment process. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing QoL of GC patients and their family caregivers, to compare the interactions and similarities and differences between the two influences, and to construct a conceptual model of the influences on QoL of GC patients and their caregivers based on the results of the study.MethodsThis descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 at two branches of a tertiary hospital in China, and participants were recruited by adopting a purposive sampling approach, where participants were patients with GC who met the criteria recommended by gastrointestinal surgeons and nurses, and caregivers were designated by patients. The sample was selected considering maximum differentiation, such as age, gender, cancer stage, and disease duration of the respondents. The sample size was based on data saturation with no new themes emerging. Based on the results of the pre-interviews, we made some adjustments to the interview format, i.e., interviewing some informants individually and others jointly. We used semi-structured interviews for data collection for the qualitative study, where participants were informed about the study, their roles, the risks and benefits of the study, and signed an informed consent form before the interviews began. In addition, the quality of field notes was assessed after each session. The process was the same for all interviews. To ensure the accuracy of the information, all information transmitted on paper was reviewed while listening to the recorded voice. We used directed content analysis to analyze the content of the interviews.ResultsA total of 30 patients and 26 caregivers were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the study, which were contextual factors (disease-specific factors, physical and social environments and individual and family characteristics), knowledge and belief factors (self symptom assessment and healthcare seeking behavior, health information delivery and accessibility, life priority adjustment), self-regulation factors (strategies for health behavior change, role adaptation and emotion regulation) and social facilitators (positive motivation and emotional support from family, friends, and society, missing companionship and challenges encountered by family and friends visiting the patient after surgery, caregiving burdens and challenges). In addition, the study confirmed a high correlation between the QoL of patients and caregivers.ConclusionOur results address past gaps in the understanding of QoL for families with GC and update the concept of QoL by constructing a conceptual model of the factors that influence QoL for GC survivors and caregivers, as well as outlining the changes needed to improve health outcomes and QoL for survivors and their caregivers. Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment process. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing QoL of GC patients and their family caregivers, to compare the interactions and similarities and differences between the two influences, and to construct a conceptual model of the influences on QoL of GC patients and their caregivers based on the results of the study. This descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 at two branches of a tertiary hospital in China, and participants were recruited by adopting a purposive sampling approach, where participants were patients with GC who met the criteria recommended by gastrointestinal surgeons and nurses, and caregivers were designated by patients. The sample was selected considering maximum differentiation, such as age, gender, cancer stage, and disease duration of the respondents. The sample size was based on data saturation with no new themes emerging. Based on the results of the pre-interviews, we made some adjustments to the interview format, i.e., interviewing some informants individually and others jointly. We used semi-structured interviews for data collection for the qualitative study, where participants were informed about the study, their roles, the risks and benefits of the study, and signed an informed consent form before the interviews began. In addition, the quality of field notes was assessed after each session. The process was the same for all interviews. To ensure the accuracy of the information, all information transmitted on paper was reviewed while listening to the recorded voice. We used directed content analysis to analyze the content of the interviews. A total of 30 patients and 26 caregivers were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the study, which were contextual factors (disease-specific factors, physical and social environments and individual and family characteristics), knowledge and belief factors (self symptom assessment and healthcare seeking behavior, health information delivery and accessibility, life priority adjustment), self-regulation factors (strategies for health behavior change, role adaptation and emotion regulation) and social facilitators (positive motivation and emotional support from family, friends, and society, missing companionship and challenges encountered by family and friends visiting the patient after surgery, caregiving burdens and challenges). In addition, the study confirmed a high correlation between the QoL of patients and caregivers. Our results address past gaps in the understanding of QoL for families with GC and update the concept of QoL by constructing a conceptual model of the factors that influence QoL for GC survivors and caregivers, as well as outlining the changes needed to improve health outcomes and QoL for survivors and their caregivers. Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment process. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing QoL of GC patients and their family caregivers, to compare the interactions and similarities and differences between the two influences, and to construct a conceptual model of the influences on QoL of GC patients and their caregivers based on the results of the study. This descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 at two branches of a tertiary hospital in China, and participants were recruited by adopting a purposive sampling approach, where participants were patients with GC who met the criteria recommended by gastrointestinal surgeons and nurses, and caregivers were designated by patients. The sample was selected considering maximum differentiation, such as age, gender, cancer stage, and disease duration of the respondents. The sample size was based on data saturation with no new themes emerging. Based on the results of the pre-interviews, we made some adjustments to the interview format, i.e., interviewing some informants individually and others jointly. We used semi-structured interviews for data collection for the qualitative study, where participants were informed about the study, their roles, the risks and benefits of the study, and signed an informed consent form before the interviews began. In addition, the quality of field notes was assessed after each session. The process was the same for all interviews. To ensure the accuracy of the information, all information transmitted on paper was reviewed while listening to the recorded voice. We used directed content analysis to analyze the content of the interviews. A total of 30 patients and 26 caregivers were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the study, which were contextual factors (disease-specific factors, physical and social environments and individual and family characteristics), knowledge and belief factors (self symptom assessment and healthcare seeking behavior, health information delivery and accessibility, life priority adjustment), self-regulation factors (strategies for health behavior change, role adaptation and emotion regulation) and social facilitators (positive motivation and emotional support from family, friends, and society, missing companionship and challenges encountered by family and friends visiting the patient after surgery, caregiving burdens and challenges). In addition, the study confirmed a high correlation between the QoL of patients and caregivers. Our results address past gaps in the understanding of QoL for families with GC and update the concept of QoL by constructing a conceptual model of the factors that influence QoL for GC survivors and caregivers, as well as outlining the changes needed to improve health outcomes and QoL for survivors and their caregivers. Abstract Introduction Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment process. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing QoL of GC patients and their family caregivers, to compare the interactions and similarities and differences between the two influences, and to construct a conceptual model of the influences on QoL of GC patients and their caregivers based on the results of the study. Methods This descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 at two branches of a tertiary hospital in China, and participants were recruited by adopting a purposive sampling approach, where participants were patients with GC who met the criteria recommended by gastrointestinal surgeons and nurses, and caregivers were designated by patients. The sample was selected considering maximum differentiation, such as age, gender, cancer stage, and disease duration of the respondents. The sample size was based on data saturation with no new themes emerging. Based on the results of the pre-interviews, we made some adjustments to the interview format, i.e., interviewing some informants individually and others jointly. We used semi-structured interviews for data collection for the qualitative study, where participants were informed about the study, their roles, the risks and benefits of the study, and signed an informed consent form before the interviews began. In addition, the quality of field notes was assessed after each session. The process was the same for all interviews. To ensure the accuracy of the information, all information transmitted on paper was reviewed while listening to the recorded voice. We used directed content analysis to analyze the content of the interviews. Results A total of 30 patients and 26 caregivers were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the study, which were contextual factors (disease-specific factors, physical and social environments and individual and family characteristics), knowledge and belief factors (self symptom assessment and healthcare seeking behavior, health information delivery and accessibility, life priority adjustment), self-regulation factors (strategies for health behavior change, role adaptation and emotion regulation) and social facilitators (positive motivation and emotional support from family, friends, and society, missing companionship and challenges encountered by family and friends visiting the patient after surgery, caregiving burdens and challenges). In addition, the study confirmed a high correlation between the QoL of patients and caregivers. Conclusion Our results address past gaps in the understanding of QoL for families with GC and update the concept of QoL by constructing a conceptual model of the factors that influence QoL for GC survivors and caregivers, as well as outlining the changes needed to improve health outcomes and QoL for survivors and their caregivers. |
| ArticleNumber | 288 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Xiang, Ziying Chen, Yanmei Ma, Xiuxiu Xin, Hanjia He, Chaozhu Gu, Yingying |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yingying surname: Gu fullname: Gu, Yingying – sequence: 2 givenname: Xiuxiu surname: Ma fullname: Ma, Xiuxiu – sequence: 3 givenname: Hanjia surname: Xin fullname: Xin, Hanjia – sequence: 4 givenname: Ziying surname: Xiang fullname: Xiang, Ziying – sequence: 5 givenname: Yanmei surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Yanmei – sequence: 6 givenname: Chaozhu surname: He fullname: He, Chaozhu |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39966806$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNptk9tu1DAQhiNURA_wAlygSEgILlLsHByHG1RVHFaqQOJwbU3scdZVNk5tZ7X7FLwy3t1SNgjlwvb4-3_bk5nz5GSwAybJc0ouKeXsrac551VG8iqjBWtYtnmUnNGypllekvrkaH6anHt_SwitOeFPktOiaRjjhJ0lv77A2nQQzNClvdGYgg7o0g58cEamEgYZl35yHbrtuxTSuwl6E6JgjSluxt66OLdDanUalpiqLaioG2MQh5BJcNhF1KUjOj-i3OsifrDZ7mT7Y-0UpF2hf5o81tB7fHY_XiQ_P374cf05u_n6aXF9dZPJipKQFZXOJbasqbjkjWKsrFkpoQVkusBW8xZK2XAsWamriucVbYmuaKNk3SqieHGRLA6-ysKtGJ1ZgdsKC0bsA9Z1AlwwskeBtaq1rIA0BEqNulVKct1yKpFgqXT0en_wGqd2hUrGhzvoZ6bzncEsRWfXIv7Foq7zMjq8vndw9m5CH8TKeIl9DwPayYuCMl40lNHdxV_-g97ayQ0xV5Gqq5LQirO_VAfxBWbQNh4sd6biiuecEJLTOlKX_6Hip3BlZCw2bWJ8JngzE0Qm4CZ0MHkvFt-_zdlXR-wSoQ9Lb_tpVy1-Dr44Tt9D3v4UaQTyAyCd9d6hfkAo2eWQiUMniNgJYt8JYlP8Bhpm_Us |
| Cites_doi | 10.3322/caac.21453 10.1136/jme.21.4.239 10.1038/nrc930 10.1111/jocn.12816 10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2515 10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.06.002 10.1111/ijn.12922 10.1155/2022/2607829 10.1080/0284186X.2022.2119098 10.1007/s10555-020-09925-3 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.029 10.1186/s12889-021-10861-2 10.3390/nu14132634 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1239410 10.1002/pon.3351 10.1177/1074840717745669 10.3389/fmed.2024.1394640 10.1007/s11764-022-01260-6 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101691 10.1002/cncr.28509 10.1007/s10865-022-00354-x 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4 10.1016/j.breast.2022.06.002 10.21037/jgo-23-248 10.1002/cncr.34164 10.3322/caac.21820 10.16771/j.cn43-1247/ts.2024.12.020 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37046 10.1177/1740774516665597 10.1002/cam4.6477 10.1007/s00520-023-07962-6 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220726-00432 10.1371/journal.pone.0209436 10.3390/ijerph19063626 10.1002/cam4.6911 10.1371/journal.pone.0278620 10.1186/s12955-018-1051-3 10.1089/jayao.2022.0034 10.3389/fpubh.2020.573003 10.2217/fon-2021-1449 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102152 10.1177/0269216308093839 10.3322/caac.21342 10.3322/caac.21834 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104179 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.022 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833176 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101860 10.1080/09638288.2019.1663946 10.1007/s00520-021-06683-y 10.1002/pon.4093 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.06.018 10.1002/pon.4834 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.003 10.1177/0269216317739806 10.3389/fpubh.2022.841102 10.1093/heapro/daad177 10.1038/bjc.2016.15 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004 10.1002/pon.6087 10.1111/1747-0080.12306 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101963 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1090623 10.1186/s12913-020-05423-y 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.018 10.1007/s10549-021-06304-6 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101996 10.3390/cancers15102759 10.1186/s12904-018-0376-3 10.1111/bjhp.12094 10.1136/fmch-2020-000351 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.05.009 10.3390/nu16111639 10.1007/s00520-022-07065-8 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1285419 10.1177/1049732309332692 10.1177/1049732310376520 10.1007/s11764-020-00975-8 10.1186/s12885-020-06759-8 10.1007/s00520-022-06976-w 10.1371/journal.pone.0236572 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.010 10.1186/s12939-017-0675-y 10.1007/s00520-023-07963-5 10.5230/jgc.2024.24.e10 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.06.007 10.1007/s00520-022-07468-7 10.3389/fpubh.2022.999745 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.09.009 10.1177/02692163231205130 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2025. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7TO 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-025-13696-x |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale in Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1471-2407 |
| EndPage | 27 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_e7d7fc5a090a4fefbddc8fb81ce0e4df PMC11837724 A828000217 39966806 10_1186_s12885_025_13696_x |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | China |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACMJI ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 LGEZI LOTEE M1P M48 M~E NADUK NXXTH O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7TO 7XB 8FK AZQEC COVID DWQXO H94 K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-35f2ceb6958c89d664764cabae6f3ebf8ba4c98e464f558251b0f519dc7bd0d83 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1471-2407 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:54 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:28:37 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:39:16 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 21:28:36 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:59:24 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:00:20 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 05:14:07 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:23:46 EDT 2025 Sat May 10 01:40:58 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:41:56 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Family caregiver Health promotion Qualitative study Gastric cancer Dyadic perspective Quality of life |
| Language | English |
| License | 2025. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c510t-35f2ceb6958c89d664764cabae6f3ebf8ba4c98e464f558251b0f519dc7bd0d83 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175401586?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 39966806 |
| PQID | 3175401586 |
| PQPubID | 44074 |
| PageCount | 27 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e7d7fc5a090a4fefbddc8fb81ce0e4df pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11837724 proquest_miscellaneous_3168391618 proquest_journals_3175401586 gale_infotracmisc_A828000217 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A828000217 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A828000217 gale_healthsolutions_A828000217 pubmed_primary_39966806 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_025_13696_x |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-02-18 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-02-18 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2025 text: 2025-02-18 day: 18 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC cancer |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Cancer |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | Y Lin (13696_CR12) 2020; 49 H Xiao (13696_CR20) 2022; 18 G Fan (13696_CR46) 2020; 20 Y Xia (13696_CR49) 2023; 11 J Choi (13696_CR24) 2022; 30 M Padilla-Ruiz (13696_CR44) 2022; 19 KE Elzinga (13696_CR67) 2016; 13 Y Cui (13696_CR47) 2024; 13 P Macía (13696_CR75) 2020; 15 13696_CR21 13696_CR17 J Hahne (13696_CR66) 2020; 103 T Matsuoka (13696_CR7) 2023; 29 D Sonkin (13696_CR2) 2024; 286-287 D Clausing (13696_CR82) 2023; 12 BT Xia (13696_CR93) 2022; 45 Q Li (13696_CR53) 2018; 16 C Ghaderi (13696_CR31) 2022; 10 L Ou (13696_CR3) 2024; 10 L O'Neill (13696_CR37) 2021; 43 ATHR Fenton (13696_CR26) 2022; 128 J McDonald (13696_CR25) 2018; 32 W Mao (13696_CR48) 2017; 16 LK Novilla (13696_CR55) 2020; 8 C Roumen (13696_CR76) 2022; 65 C Liu (13696_CR57) 2020; 8 L Fallowfield (13696_CR23) 2002; 2 Z Eisikovits (13696_CR28) 2010; 20 X Kong (13696_CR43) 2019; 11 F Bray (13696_CR6) 2024; 74 JK Triantafillidis (13696_CR33) 2024; 16 O Eymech (13696_CR78) 2022; 30 L McCauley (13696_CR42) 2021; 69 R Li (13696_CR5) 2023; 15 P Zanobini (13696_CR61) 2023; 38 EG Bouchard (13696_CR85) 2023; 32 HC Yiu (13696_CR56) 2020; 41 X Li (13696_CR52) 2021; 21 MC Rutan (13696_CR60) 2021; 60 J Phan (13696_CR69) 2023; 12 DSK Cheung (13696_CR54) 2018; 17 N Islam (13696_CR72) 2023; 18 C Moore (13696_CR64) 2021; 15 KS Lyons (13696_CR30) 2018; 24 E Law (13696_CR86) 2018; 13 A Miles (13696_CR45) 2017; 26 J Arndt (13696_CR74) 2014; 23 Bureau of Medical Administration, National Health Commission of the People′s Republic of China (13696_CR10) 2022; 21 CW Wei (13696_CR59) 2021; 27 R Ding (13696_CR41) 2020; 20 M Pape (13696_CR15) 2023; 31 A Almoajel (13696_CR65) 2022; 10 A Chambers (13696_CR80) 2022; 13 JL Oliffe (13696_CR89) 2009; 19 BK Edwards (13696_CR38) 2014; 120 Z Guo (13696_CR88) 1995; 21 H Wang (13696_CR22) 2021; 52 R McCauley (13696_CR87) 2023; 37 MJ Traa (13696_CR73) 2015; 20 H Zhang (13696_CR16) 2022; 2022 JN Portelli Tremont (13696_CR58) 2020; 220 A Naghavi (13696_CR68) 2023; 14 DK Teteh (13696_CR51) 2023; 11 L Fu (13696_CR14) 2022; 63 HM Wang (13696_CR34) 2022; 14 IR Kleckner (13696_CR35) 2021; 189 E Chong (13696_CR90) 2022; 31 M Van de Wiel (13696_CR70) 2021; 22 D Sarfati (13696_CR39) 2016; 66 AD Wagner (13696_CR11) 2017; 8 Y Li (13696_CR19) 2022; 127 BM Scarborough (13696_CR32) 2018; 68 I Ruiz-Rodríguez (13696_CR83) 2022; 13 SP Morgan (13696_CR91) 2022; 60 AT Gudina (13696_CR84) 2021; 74 JK Jun (13696_CR9) 2017; 152 RM Benzo (13696_CR40) 2023; 31 BC Goodwin (13696_CR62) 2018; 27 P Ryan (13696_CR29) 2009; 57 F Tao (13696_CR13) 2023; 14 F Xu (13696_CR27) 2024; 31 J Rowlands (13696_CR50) 2008; 22 MA Barrero-Mejias (13696_CR79) 2024; 11 RL Siegel (13696_CR1) 2024; 74 C Xiaoyun (13696_CR18) 2020; 44 A Schandl (13696_CR92) 2022; 61 KP Ko (13696_CR4) 2024; 24 C Vrinten (13696_CR77) 2016; 114 J Hong (13696_CR71) 2015; 24 Y Zhang (13696_CR63) 2023; 17 L Wang (13696_CR81) 2022; 30 RE Sexton (13696_CR8) 2020; 39 M Mak (13696_CR36) 2017; 74 |
| References_xml | – volume: 68 start-page: 182 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 13696_CR32 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21453 – volume: 21 start-page: 239 issue: 4 year: 1995 ident: 13696_CR88 publication-title: J Med Ethics. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.4.239 – ident: 13696_CR21 – volume: 2 start-page: 873 issue: 11 year: 2002 ident: 13696_CR23 publication-title: Nat Rev Cancer doi: 10.1038/nrc930 – volume: 24 start-page: 2439 issue: 17–18 year: 2015 ident: 13696_CR71 publication-title: J Clin Nurs doi: 10.1111/jocn.12816 – volume: 29 start-page: 2515 issue: 17 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR7 publication-title: World J Gastroenterol. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2515 – volume: 286-287 start-page: 18 year: 2024 ident: 13696_CR2 publication-title: Cancer Genet. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.06.002 – volume: 27 start-page: 10.1111/ijn.129 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR59 publication-title: Int J Nurs Pract. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12922 – volume: 2022 start-page: 2607829 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR16 publication-title: J Oncol doi: 10.1155/2022/2607829 – volume: 61 start-page: 1186 issue: 10 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR92 publication-title: Acta Oncol doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2022.2119098 – volume: 39 start-page: 1179 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR8 publication-title: Cancer Metastasis Rev doi: 10.1007/s10555-020-09925-3 – volume: 152 start-page: 1319 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 13696_CR9 publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.029 – volume: 21 start-page: 774 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR52 publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10861-2 – volume: 14 start-page: 2634 issue: 13 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR34 publication-title: Nutrients doi: 10.3390/nu14132634 – volume: 14 start-page: 1239410 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR68 publication-title: Front Psychol doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1239410 – volume: 23 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 13696_CR74 publication-title: Psychooncology doi: 10.1002/pon.3351 – volume: 24 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 13696_CR30 publication-title: J Fam Nurs doi: 10.1177/1074840717745669 – volume: 11 start-page: 1394640 year: 2024 ident: 13696_CR79 publication-title: Front Med (Lausanne). doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1394640 – volume: 17 start-page: 425 issue: 2 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR63 publication-title: J Cancer Surviv doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01260-6 – volume: 44 start-page: 101691 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR18 publication-title: Eur J Oncol Nurs doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101691 – volume: 120 start-page: 1290 issue: 9 year: 2014 ident: 13696_CR38 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.28509 – volume: 45 start-page: 935 issue: 6 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR93 publication-title: J Behav Med doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00354-x – volume: 8 start-page: CD004064 issue: 8 year: 2017 ident: 13696_CR11 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4 – volume: 65 start-page: 8 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR76 publication-title: Breast. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.06.002 – volume: 14 start-page: 952 issue: 2 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR13 publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-248 – volume: 128 start-page: 2015 issue: 10 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR26 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.34164 – volume: 74 start-page: 12 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 13696_CR1 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820 – volume: 31 start-page: 118 issue: 12 year: 2024 ident: 13696_CR27 publication-title: Furniture Interior Design doi: 10.16771/j.cn43-1247/ts.2024.12.020 – volume: 10 start-page: e37046 issue: 17 year: 2024 ident: 13696_CR3 publication-title: Heliyon. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37046 – volume: 13 start-page: 574 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 13696_CR67 publication-title: Clin Trials. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665597 – volume: 12 start-page: 19102 issue: 18 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR82 publication-title: Cancer Med doi: 10.1002/cam4.6477 – volume: 31 start-page: 496 issue: 8 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR40 publication-title: Support Care Cancer doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07962-6 – volume: 21 start-page: 1137 issue: 9 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR10 publication-title: Chin J Dig Surg. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220726-00432 – volume: 13 start-page: e0209436 issue: 12 year: 2018 ident: 13696_CR86 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209436 – volume: 19 start-page: 3626 issue: 6 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR44 publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063626 – volume: 13 start-page: e6911 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 13696_CR47 publication-title: Cancer Med. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6911 – volume: 18 start-page: e0278620 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR72 publication-title: PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278620 – volume: 16 start-page: 230 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 13696_CR53 publication-title: Health Qual Life Outcomes doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1051-3 – volume: 12 start-page: 389 issue: 3 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR69 publication-title: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol doi: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0034 – volume: 8 start-page: 573003 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR55 publication-title: Front Public Health. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.573003 – volume: 18 start-page: 1199 issue: 10 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR20 publication-title: Future Oncol. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-1449 – volume: 60 start-page: 102152 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR91 publication-title: Eur J Oncol Nurs doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102152 – volume: 22 start-page: 768 issue: 6 year: 2008 ident: 13696_CR50 publication-title: Palliat Med doi: 10.1177/0269216308093839 – volume: 66 start-page: 337 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 13696_CR39 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21342 – volume: 74 start-page: 229 issue: 3 year: 2024 ident: 13696_CR6 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834 – volume: 127 start-page: 104179 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR19 publication-title: Int J Nurs Stud. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104179 – volume: 103 start-page: 286 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR66 publication-title: Patient Educ Couns doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.022 – volume: 13 start-page: 833176 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR83 publication-title: Front Psychol. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833176 – volume: 49 start-page: 101860 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR12 publication-title: Eur J Oncol Nurs doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101860 – volume: 43 start-page: 1396 issue: 10 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR37 publication-title: Disabil Rehabil. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1663946 – volume: 30 start-page: 3215 issue: 4 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR24 publication-title: Support Care Cancer doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06683-y – volume: 26 start-page: 29 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 13696_CR45 publication-title: Psychooncology doi: 10.1002/pon.4093 – volume: 41 start-page: 885 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR56 publication-title: Geriatr Nurs doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.06.018 – volume: 27 start-page: 2374 issue: 10 year: 2018 ident: 13696_CR62 publication-title: Psychooncology doi: 10.1002/pon.4834 – volume: 63 start-page: 230 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR14 publication-title: J Pain Symptom Manage. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.003 – volume: 32 start-page: 69 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 13696_CR25 publication-title: Palliat Med doi: 10.1177/0269216317739806 – volume: 10 start-page: 841102 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR65 publication-title: Front Public Health. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.841102 – volume: 38 start-page: daad177 issue: 6 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR61 publication-title: Health Promot Int. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad177 – volume: 114 start-page: 597 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 13696_CR77 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.15 – volume: 57 start-page: 217 issue: 4 year: 2009 ident: 13696_CR29 publication-title: Nurs Outlook doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004 – ident: 13696_CR17 – volume: 32 start-page: 408 issue: 3 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR85 publication-title: Psychooncology doi: 10.1002/pon.6087 – volume: 74 start-page: 229 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 13696_CR36 publication-title: Nutr Diet doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12306 – volume: 52 start-page: 101963 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR22 publication-title: Eur J Oncol Nurs. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101963 – volume: 11 start-page: 1090623 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR49 publication-title: Front Public Health doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1090623 – volume: 20 start-page: 553 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR46 publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05423-y – volume: 60 start-page: e69 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR60 publication-title: Am J Prev Med. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.018 – volume: 189 start-page: 521 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR35 publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06304-6 – volume: 74 start-page: 101996 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR84 publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101996 – volume: 15 start-page: 2759 issue: 10 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR5 publication-title: Cancers (Basel). doi: 10.3390/cancers15102759 – volume: 17 start-page: 124 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 13696_CR54 publication-title: BMC Palliat Care doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0376-3 – volume: 20 start-page: 85 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 13696_CR73 publication-title: Br J Health Psychol doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12094 – volume: 8 start-page: e000351 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR57 publication-title: Fam Med Community Health. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000351 – volume: 220 start-page: 806 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR58 publication-title: Am J Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.05.009 – volume: 16 start-page: 1639 issue: 11 year: 2024 ident: 13696_CR33 publication-title: Nutrients. doi: 10.3390/nu16111639 – volume: 30 start-page: 6851 issue: 8 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR81 publication-title: Support Care Cancer doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07065-8 – volume: 11 start-page: 1285419 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR51 publication-title: Front Public Health doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1285419 – volume: 19 start-page: 432 issue: 4 year: 2009 ident: 13696_CR89 publication-title: Qual Health Res. doi: 10.1177/1049732309332692 – volume: 20 start-page: 1642 issue: 12 year: 2010 ident: 13696_CR28 publication-title: Qual Health Res doi: 10.1177/1049732310376520 – volume: 15 start-page: 825 issue: 6 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR64 publication-title: J Cancer Surviv doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00975-8 – volume: 20 start-page: 250 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR41 publication-title: BMC Cancer doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06759-8 – volume: 30 start-page: 5459 issue: 6 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR78 publication-title: Support Care Cancer. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06976-w – volume: 15 start-page: e0236572 issue: 7 year: 2020 ident: 13696_CR75 publication-title: PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236572 – volume: 22 start-page: e146 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR70 publication-title: Clin Lung Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.010 – volume: 16 start-page: 180 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 13696_CR48 publication-title: Int J Equity Health doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0675-y – volume: 31 start-page: 520 issue: 9 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR15 publication-title: Support Care Cancer doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07963-5 – volume: 24 start-page: 99 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 13696_CR4 publication-title: J Gastric Cancer. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2024.24.e10 – volume: 69 start-page: 720 issue: 5 year: 2021 ident: 13696_CR42 publication-title: Nurs Outlook doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.06.007 – volume: 31 start-page: 74 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR90 publication-title: Support Care Cancer doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07468-7 – volume: 10 start-page: 999745 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR31 publication-title: Front Public Health. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.999745 – volume: 13 start-page: 214 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 13696_CR80 publication-title: J Geriatr Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.09.009 – volume: 37 start-page: 1520 issue: 10 year: 2023 ident: 13696_CR87 publication-title: Palliat Med doi: 10.1177/02692163231205130 – volume: 11 start-page: 2632 issue: 5 year: 2019 ident: 13696_CR43 publication-title: Am J Transl Res |
| SSID | ssj0017808 |
| Score | 2.4571977 |
| Snippet | Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be... Introduction Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the... IntroductionGastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the... Abstract Introduction Gastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 288 |
| SubjectTerms | Adaptation, Psychological Adult Aged Analysis Beliefs, opinions and attitudes Cancer Cancer patients Cancer therapies Care and treatment Caregivers Caregivers - psychology Chemotherapy China Data collection Dyadic perspective Family Family caregiver Female Gastric cancer Health aspects Health insurance Health promotion Hospitals Humans Interviews Male Medical law Medical prognosis Medical research Middle Aged Oncology, Experimental Patient outcomes Patients Qualitative Research Qualitative study Quality of life Quality of Life - psychology Research methodology Social aspects Social environment Stomach cancer Stomach Neoplasms - psychology Stomach Neoplasms - surgery Surgery |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQD4gLojwDBQxC4oCsZjeOM-FWEFVBag9Apd4sP5dKKKma3ar9FfxlZuzsshEHLlzX4-zuvDwTz3zD2Bsr8QyezZ2oWqmEBBOFNTII4y04WUel0qvs4xN1dCq_nNVnW6O-qCYswwNnxu2HxjfR1aZsSyNjiNZ7B9HCzIUySB_J--KZt06mxvuDBkpYt8iA2h_QCwN1ItdiRgPsxPXkGEpo_X_75K1DaVowuXUCHd5jd8fQkR_kn7zLboXuPrt9PF6OP2C_TsxVAszoFvzneQw8zf_mC0OjORx3JN9LPuQ-6Pfc8NxQmZC_eUi1eElMvI8cw0Lubww-mo_Iq4JqxBZUxcEv_jRociTPj7mhbelr-9US1TgMD9np4afvH4_EOG9BOLTMpajqOHfBqrYGB61XSjZKOmNNULEKNgJK0bUQpJKxrqnn1ZYRI0DvGutLD9UjttP1XXjCeERKzBxbFRrMt3xpFN24YuwYAF2ktQV7t2a_vsiwGjqlI6B0FpZGYekkLH1dsA8koQ0lQWKnD1BR9Kgo-l-KUrCXJF-d-0s3hq0PMOcsU2pWsNeJgmAxOqq7WZjVMOjP375OiN6ORLFHXXBmbGPA_01IWhPKvQkl2q2bLq8VTY9-Y9AUzWHGW4Mq2KvNMu2kWrgu9CuiUUDt0jMo2OOslxvOVJS-Qom7YaKxE9ZNV7rzHwlVHHlfYaoln_4PZj9jd-ZkbTQ5B_bYzvJyFZ5j9La0L5Kh_gaTn0iN priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfR3LbtQw0IIiIS6INykFDELigKwmG8dxuKCCqApSewAq7c3yc6mEku1mF7VfwS8z43jTRkhc1-NkM--x50HIG8PBBhczy8qGC8alDsxo7pl2RlpeBSHiUfbxiTg65V_n1TwduPUprXKrE6Oidp3FM_J9tHMQC1RSfFieM5wahberaYTGTXILW5chV9fzMeAqapnLbaGMFPs96GKJ9cgVK3CMHbuYGKPYs_9fzXzNNE3TJq_ZocN75G5yIOnBQPH75IZvH5Dbx-mK_CH5c6J_x7YZ7YL-OguexingdKFxQIelFqm8ov1QDf2eajqUVcb-39THjLxILNoFCs4hdZcaHk1T_1WGmWILzOWgy6syTQrgw2MucVt8bbdZA2J9_4icHn7-8emIpakLzIJ8rllZhZn1RjSVtLJxQvBacKuN9iKU3gQJtLSN9FzwUFVY-WryAH6gs7VxuZPlY7LTdq1_SmgASIgfG-FriLpcrgXeu4IH6SUoSmMy8m6LfrUcmmuoGJRIoQZiKSCWisRSFxn5iBQaIbExdvyhWy1UkjPla1cHW-m8yTUPPhjnrAxGFtbnnruQkZdIXzVUmY7irQ4g8sxjgJaR1xECm2O0mH2z0Ju-V1--f5sAvU1AoQNesDoVM8B3Yz-tCeTeBBKk106Xt4ymkvbo1RWvZ-TVuIw7MSOu9d0GYYTEoulCZuTJwJcjZkoMYmUOu-WEYyeom660Zz9jb3HAfQkBF9_9__96Ru7MUI5wMo7cIzvr1cY_B-9sbV5EEfwLYFs87Q priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Navigating life after gastric cancer surgery: a qualitative exploration of the dyadic patient-caregiver perspective on quality of life outcomes |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39966806 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175401586 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168391618 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11837724 https://doaj.org/article/e7d7fc5a090a4fefbddc8fb81ce0e4df |
| Volume | 25 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjR1db9Mw0BqbhHhBfJMxikFIPKBA2jiOg4TQijYNpFaoUKnixfJnmTQlW9Oi9Vfwl7lz0m4Re-AlD_HZUe7Dd2ffByGvNQMd3B-YOC0Yj5lQPtaKuVhZLQzLPOfhKHs05idT9nWWzXbIpt1Ri8D6RtcO-0lNF2fvLi_Wn0DgPwaBF_x9DXuswDzjLO5je7oYbMo90Ew5djQYsatbhVyEDnV92JDxViHfJNHcuEZHUYV6_v_u2tfUVjek8pqOOr5H7rbGJT1suOE-2XHlA3J71F6fPyR_xup3KKlRzunZqXc0dAinc4XNOww1yAELWjeZ0h-ook3KZagNTl2I1guEpJWnYDhSu1awNG1rs8YYRTbHOA96fpXCSQG8WWaN08Jnq9USGN3Vj8j0-OjH55O47cgQG5DdZZxmfmCc5kUmjCgs5yznzCitHPep014AnU0hHOPMZxlmxerEg41oTa5tYkX6mOyWVemeEuoBEnzLgrscPDKbKI53smBdOgGbqNYRebtBvzxvCm_I4LAILhtiSSCWDMSSlxEZIoW2kFg0O7yoFnPZyqB0uc29yVRSJIp557W1Rngt-sYljlkfkRdIX9lkoG5FXx6CV5oE5y0irwIEFs4oMTJnrlZ1Lb98n3SA3rRAvgJeMKpNdID_xlpbHciDDiRItukObxhNbgRDor0HPnEmeERebodxJkbLla5aIQwXmFDdFxF50vDlFjMpOrgigdmiw7Ed1HVHytNfoe444D4FZ4zt_8eHn5E7AxQmbJ0jDsjucrFyz8F8W-oeuZXP8h7ZGx6Nv0164RCkF-QUnpPhz7-MXUjV |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLbGkIAXxJ3AYAaBeEDR0tZxHCSExmVq2boH2KS-eb6WSSgpTQvrr-Cf8Bs5x0m6RUi87bU-dhOfm7_4XAh5oRn44F7fxIOc8ZgJ5WOtmIuV1cKw1HMePmWPD_nwmH2epJMN8qfNhcGwytYmBkNtS4PfyHfQzwEWSAV_N_sRY9covF1tW2jUYrHvVr8AslVvRx-Bvy_7_b1PRx-GcdNVIDYgf4t4kPq-cZrnqTAit5yzjDOjtHLcD5z2Ap7V5MIxznyaYmanTjycc6zJtE2sGMC6V8hVcLwJgr1ssgZ4vUwkok3MEXynAtsvMP85jXvYNi8-6zi_0CPgX09wwRV2wzQv-L29W-Rmc2Clu7WE3SYbrrhDro2bK_m75Peh-hnKdBRT-v3UOxq6jtOpwoYghhqUqjmt6uzrN1TROo0z1BunLkQABuGgpadwGKV2pWBp2tR7jTEybYqxI3R2nhZKgbxeZoXTwt-WywUw0lX3yPGl8OM-2SzKwj0k1AMl4NWcuwxQnk0Ux3teOLE6AYZZ64i8brdfzupiHjKAIMFlzSwJzJKBWfIsIu-RQ2tKLMQdfijnU9notXSZzbxJVZIninnntbVGeC16xiWOWR-RbeSvrLNa1-ZE7gLSTQIgjMjzQIHFOAqM9pmqZVXJ0dcvHaJXDZEvQRaMapIn4L2xfleHcqtDCdbCdIdbQZONtarkuW5F5Nl6GGdiBF7hyiXScIFJ2j0RkQe1XK53ZoCgWSQwW3QktrN13ZHi9FuoZQ57PwCAxx79_7m2yfXh0fhAHowO9x-TG33UKezKI7bI5mK-dE_gZLjQT4M6UnJy2fr_F1Hcet4 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Navigating+life+after+gastric+cancer+surgery%3A+a+qualitative+exploration+of+the+dyadic+patient-caregiver+perspective+on+quality+of+life+outcomes&rft.jtitle=BMC+cancer&rft.au=Gu%2C+Yingying&rft.au=Ma%2C+Xiuxiu&rft.au=Xin%2C+Hanjia&rft.au=Xiang%2C+Ziying&rft.date=2025-02-18&rft.issn=1471-2407&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12885-025-13696-x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon |