Neural oscillatory responses to performance monitoring differ between high‐ and low‐impulsive individuals, but are unaffected by TMS

• Published in: Human brain mapping Vol. 42; no. 8; pp. 2416 - 2433
• Main Authors: Barth, Beatrix, Rohe, Tim, Deppermann, Saskia, Fallgatter, Andreas Jochen, Ehlis, Ann‐Christine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.06.2021
• Subjects: Adult; Attention - physiology; Cerebral Cortex - physiology; Clustering; Cognitive ability; Double-Blind Method; EEG; Electroencephalography; Executive Function - physiology; Female; Humans; Impulsive behavior; Impulsive Behavior - physiology; Impulsivity; intertrial phase coherence; Male; Monitoring; Neurophysiology; performance monitoring; Phase coherence; Prefrontal cortex; Psychomotor Performance - physiology; Reaction time; Reaction Time - physiology; Reaction time task; single‐trial phase behavior coupling; Stimulation; Theta Rhythm - physiology; time‐frequency analysis; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Young Adult; impulsivity; intertrial phase coherence; single-trial phase behavior coupling; transcranial magnetic stimulation; performance monitoring; time-frequency analysis

Higher impulsivity may arise from neurophysiological deficits of cognitive control in the prefrontal cortex. Cognitive control can be assessed by time‐frequency decompositions of electrophysiological data. We aimed to clarify neuroelectric mechanisms of performance monitoring in connection with impu...