Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was effective across a range of dysglycaemia and body mass index categories in the DUAL V randomized trial

This study assessed the efficacy of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) vs insulin glargine U100 (IGlar) across categories of baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; ≤7.5%, >7.5% to ≤8.5% and >8.5%), body mass index (BMI; <30, ≥30 to <35 and ≥35 kg/m2) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes, obesity & metabolism Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 200 - 205
Main Authors Lingvay, Ildiko, Harris, Stewart, Jaeckel, Elmar, Chandarana, Keval, Ranthe, Mattis F., Jódar, Esteban
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2018
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study assessed the efficacy of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) vs insulin glargine U100 (IGlar) across categories of baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; ≤7.5%, >7.5% to ≤8.5% and >8.5%), body mass index (BMI; <30, ≥30 to <35 and ≥35 kg/m2) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG; <7.2 and ≥7.2 mmol/L) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on basal insulin, using post hoc analyses of the DUAL V 26‐week trial. With IDegLira, mean HbA1c was reduced across all baseline HbA1c (1.0%‐2.5%), FPG (1.5%‐1.9%) and BMI categories (1.8%‐1.9%), with significantly greater reductions compared with IGlar U100. For all HbA1c, FPG and BMI categories, IDegLira resulted in weight loss and IGlar U100 in weight gain; hypoglycaemia rates were lower for IDegLira vs IGlar U100. More patients achieved HbA1c <7% with IDegLira than IGlar U100 across all HbA1c (59%‐87% vs 31%‐66%), FPG (71%‐74% vs 40%‐51%) and BMI categories (71%‐73% vs 40%‐54%). IDegLira improved glycaemic control and induced weight loss in patients with T2D previously uncontrolled on basal insulin, across the categories of baseline HbA1c, FPG or BMI that were tested.
Bibliography:Funding information This study was funded by Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk was involved in the trial design and protocol development, provided logistical support, and obtained the data, which were evaluated jointly by the authors and the sponsor. The writing of this paper was supported by Novo Nordisk A/S
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.13043