Smart Cybersecurity Framework for IoT-Empowered Drones: Machine Learning Perspective

Drone advancements have ushered in new trends and possibilities in a variety of sectors, particularly for small-sized drones. Drones provide navigational interlocation services, which are made possible by the Internet of Things (IoT). Drone networks, on the other hand, are subject to privacy and sec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 22; no. 7; p. 2630
Main Authors Aldaej, Abdulaziz, Ahanger, Tariq Ahamed, Atiquzzaman, Mohammed, Ullah, Imdad, Yousufudin, Muhammad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 29.03.2022
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Drone advancements have ushered in new trends and possibilities in a variety of sectors, particularly for small-sized drones. Drones provide navigational interlocation services, which are made possible by the Internet of Things (IoT). Drone networks, on the other hand, are subject to privacy and security risks due to design flaws. To achieve the desired performance, it is necessary to create a protected network. The goal of the current study is to look at recent privacy and security concerns influencing the network of drones (NoD). The current research emphasizes the importance of a security-empowered drone network to prevent interception and intrusion. A hybrid ML technique of logistic regression and random forest is used for the purpose of classification of data instances for maximal efficacy. By incorporating sophisticated artificial-intelligence-inspired techniques into the framework of a NoD, the proposed technique mitigates cybersecurity vulnerabilities while making the NoD protected and secure. For validation purposes, the suggested technique is tested against a challenging dataset, registering enhanced performance results in terms of temporal efficacy (34.56 s), statistical measures (precision (97.68%), accuracy (98.58%), recall (98.59%), F-measure (99.01%), reliability (94.69%), and stability (0.73).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s22072630