Rumen fermentation parameters and papillae development in Simmental growing bulls with divergent residual feed intake
•Residual feed intake is an attractive trait for the livestock sector.•Residual feed intake affects propionate production but not methane.•A small part of ruminal bacteria differs between the feed efficiency groups.•Macroscopic changes in ruminal papillae morphology were observed.•The main causes of...
Saved in:
Published in | Animal (Cambridge, England) Vol. 18; no. 5; p. 101149 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier B.V
01.05.2024
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | •Residual feed intake is an attractive trait for the livestock sector.•Residual feed intake affects propionate production but not methane.•A small part of ruminal bacteria differs between the feed efficiency groups.•Macroscopic changes in ruminal papillae morphology were observed.•The main causes of animal feed efficiency differences remain unknown.
Residual feed intake (RFI), a widespread index used to measure animal feed efficiency, is influenced by various individual biological factors related to inter-animal variation that need to be assessed. Herein, 30 Simmental bulls, raised under the same farm conditions, were divided on the basis of RFI values into a high efficient group (HE, RFI = − 1.18 ± 0.33 kg DM/d, n = 15) and a low efficient group (LE, RFI = 0.92 ± 0.35 kg DM/d, n = 15). Subsequently, bulls were slaughtered at an average BW of 734 ± 39.4 kg. Their ruminal fermentation traits were analysed immediately after slaughtering and after 24 h of in vitro incubation. Furthermore, ruminal micro-biota composition and ruminal papillae morphology were examined. The LE group exhibited a higher propionate concentration as a percentage of total volatile fatty acids (17.3 vs 16.1%, P = 0.04) in the rumen fluid collected during slaughtering, which was also confirmed after in vitro fermentation (16.6 vs 15.4% respectively for LE and HE, P = 0.01). This phenomenon resulted in a significant alteration in the acetate−to−propionate ratio (A:P) with higher values for the HE group, both after slaughter (4.01 vs 3.66, P = 0.02) and after in vitro incubation (3.78 vs 3.66, P = 0.02). Methane production was similar in both groups either as absolute production (227 vs 218 mL for HE and LE, respectively) or expressed as a percentage of total gas (approximately 22%). Even if significant differences (P < 0.20) in the relative abundance of some bacterial genera were observed for the two RFI groups, no significant variations were observed in the alpha (Shannon index) and beta (Bray–Curtis index) diversity. Considering the papillae morphology, the LE subjects have shown higher length values (6.26 vs 4.90 mm, P < 0.01) while HE subjects have demonstrated higher papillae density (46.4 vs 40.5 n/cm2, P = 0.02). Histo-morphometric analysis did not reveal appreciable modifications in the total papilla thickness, boundaries or surface between the experimental groups. In conclusion, our results contribute to efforts to analyse the factors affecting feed efficiency at the ruminal level. Propionate production, papillae morphology and a few bacterial genera certainly play a role in this regard, although not a decisive one. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Residual feed intake (RFI), a widespread index used to measure animal feed efficiency, is influenced by various individual biological factors related to inter-animal variation that need to be assessed. Herein, 30 Simmental bulls, raised under the same farm conditions, were divided on the basis of RFI values into a high efficient group (HE, RFI = - 1.18 ± 0.33 kg DM/d, n = 15) and a low efficient group (LE, RFI = 0.92 ± 0.35 kg DM/d, n = 15). Subsequently, bulls were slaughtered at an average BW of 734 ± 39.4 kg. Their ruminal fermentation traits were analysed immediately after slaughtering and after 24 h of in vitro incubation. Furthermore, ruminal micro-biota composition and ruminal papillae morphology were examined. The LE group exhibited a higher propionate concentration as a percentage of total volatile fatty acids (17.3 vs 16.1%, P = 0.04) in the rumen fluid collected during slaughtering, which was also confirmed after in vitro fermentation (16.6 vs 15.4% respectively for LE and HE, P = 0.01). This phenomenon resulted in a significant alteration in the acetate-to-propionate ratio (A:P) with higher values for the HE group, both after slaughter (4.01 vs 3.66, P = 0.02) and after in vitro incubation (3.78 vs 3.66, P = 0.02). Methane production was similar in both groups either as absolute production (227 vs 218 mL for HE and LE, respectively) or expressed as a percentage of total gas (approximately 22%). Even if significant differences (P < 0.20) in the relative abundance of some bacterial genera were observed for the two RFI groups, no significant variations were observed in the alpha (Shannon index) and beta (Bray-Curtis index) diversity. Considering the papillae morphology, the LE subjects have shown higher length values (6.26 vs 4.90 mm, P < 0.01) while HE subjects have demonstrated higher papillae density (46.4 vs 40.5 n/cm2, P = 0.02). Histo-morphometric analysis did not reveal appreciable modifications in the total papilla thickness, boundaries or surface between the experimental groups. In conclusion, our results contribute to efforts to analyse the factors affecting feed efficiency at the ruminal level. Propionate production, papillae morphology and a few bacterial genera certainly play a role in this regard, although not a decisive one.Residual feed intake (RFI), a widespread index used to measure animal feed efficiency, is influenced by various individual biological factors related to inter-animal variation that need to be assessed. Herein, 30 Simmental bulls, raised under the same farm conditions, were divided on the basis of RFI values into a high efficient group (HE, RFI = - 1.18 ± 0.33 kg DM/d, n = 15) and a low efficient group (LE, RFI = 0.92 ± 0.35 kg DM/d, n = 15). Subsequently, bulls were slaughtered at an average BW of 734 ± 39.4 kg. Their ruminal fermentation traits were analysed immediately after slaughtering and after 24 h of in vitro incubation. Furthermore, ruminal micro-biota composition and ruminal papillae morphology were examined. The LE group exhibited a higher propionate concentration as a percentage of total volatile fatty acids (17.3 vs 16.1%, P = 0.04) in the rumen fluid collected during slaughtering, which was also confirmed after in vitro fermentation (16.6 vs 15.4% respectively for LE and HE, P = 0.01). This phenomenon resulted in a significant alteration in the acetate-to-propionate ratio (A:P) with higher values for the HE group, both after slaughter (4.01 vs 3.66, P = 0.02) and after in vitro incubation (3.78 vs 3.66, P = 0.02). Methane production was similar in both groups either as absolute production (227 vs 218 mL for HE and LE, respectively) or expressed as a percentage of total gas (approximately 22%). Even if significant differences (P < 0.20) in the relative abundance of some bacterial genera were observed for the two RFI groups, no significant variations were observed in the alpha (Shannon index) and beta (Bray-Curtis index) diversity. Considering the papillae morphology, the LE subjects have shown higher length values (6.26 vs 4.90 mm, P < 0.01) while HE subjects have demonstrated higher papillae density (46.4 vs 40.5 n/cm2, P = 0.02). Histo-morphometric analysis did not reveal appreciable modifications in the total papilla thickness, boundaries or surface between the experimental groups. In conclusion, our results contribute to efforts to analyse the factors affecting feed efficiency at the ruminal level. Propionate production, papillae morphology and a few bacterial genera certainly play a role in this regard, although not a decisive one. Residual feed intake (RFI), a widespread index used to measure animal feed efficiency, is influenced by various individual biological factors related to inter-animal variation that need to be assessed. Herein, 30 Simmental bulls, raised under the same farm conditions, were divided on the basis of RFI values into a high efficient group (HE, RFI = − 1.18 ± 0.33 kg DM/d, n = 15) and a low efficient group (LE, RFI = 0.92 ± 0.35 kg DM/d, n = 15). Subsequently, bulls were slaughtered at an average BW of 734 ± 39.4 kg. Their ruminal fermentation traits were analysed immediately after slaughtering and after 24 h of in vitro incubation. Furthermore, ruminal micro-biota composition and ruminal papillae morphology were examined. The LE group exhibited a higher propionate concentration as a percentage of total volatile fatty acids (17.3 vs 16.1%, P = 0.04) in the rumen fluid collected during slaughtering, which was also confirmed after in vitro fermentation (16.6 vs 15.4% respectively for LE and HE, P = 0.01). This phenomenon resulted in a significant alteration in the acetate−to−propionate ratio (A:P) with higher values for the HE group, both after slaughter (4.01 vs 3.66, P = 0.02) and after in vitro incubation (3.78 vs 3.66, P = 0.02). Methane production was similar in both groups either as absolute production (227 vs 218 mL for HE and LE, respectively) or expressed as a percentage of total gas (approximately 22%). Even if significant differences (P < 0.20) in the relative abundance of some bacterial genera were observed for the two RFI groups, no significant variations were observed in the alpha (Shannon index) and beta (Bray–Curtis index) diversity. Considering the papillae morphology, the LE subjects have shown higher length values (6.26 vs 4.90 mm, P < 0.01) while HE subjects have demonstrated higher papillae density (46.4 vs 40.5 n/cm2, P = 0.02). Histo-morphometric analysis did not reveal appreciable modifications in the total papilla thickness, boundaries or surface between the experimental groups. In conclusion, our results contribute to efforts to analyse the factors affecting feed efficiency at the ruminal level. Propionate production, papillae morphology and a few bacterial genera certainly play a role in this regard, although not a decisive one. •Residual feed intake is an attractive trait for the livestock sector.•Residual feed intake affects propionate production but not methane.•A small part of ruminal bacteria differs between the feed efficiency groups.•Macroscopic changes in ruminal papillae morphology were observed.•The main causes of animal feed efficiency differences remain unknown. Residual feed intake (RFI), a widespread index used to measure animal feed efficiency, is influenced by various individual biological factors related to inter-animal variation that need to be assessed. Herein, 30 Simmental bulls, raised under the same farm conditions, were divided on the basis of RFI values into a high efficient group (HE, RFI = − 1.18 ± 0.33 kg DM/d, n = 15) and a low efficient group (LE, RFI = 0.92 ± 0.35 kg DM/d, n = 15). Subsequently, bulls were slaughtered at an average BW of 734 ± 39.4 kg. Their ruminal fermentation traits were analysed immediately after slaughtering and after 24 h of in vitro incubation. Furthermore, ruminal micro-biota composition and ruminal papillae morphology were examined. The LE group exhibited a higher propionate concentration as a percentage of total volatile fatty acids (17.3 vs 16.1%, P = 0.04) in the rumen fluid collected during slaughtering, which was also confirmed after in vitro fermentation (16.6 vs 15.4% respectively for LE and HE, P = 0.01). This phenomenon resulted in a significant alteration in the acetate−to−propionate ratio (A:P) with higher values for the HE group, both after slaughter (4.01 vs 3.66, P = 0.02) and after in vitro incubation (3.78 vs 3.66, P = 0.02). Methane production was similar in both groups either as absolute production (227 vs 218 mL for HE and LE, respectively) or expressed as a percentage of total gas (approximately 22%). Even if significant differences (P < 0.20) in the relative abundance of some bacterial genera were observed for the two RFI groups, no significant variations were observed in the alpha (Shannon index) and beta (Bray–Curtis index) diversity. Considering the papillae morphology, the LE subjects have shown higher length values (6.26 vs 4.90 mm, P < 0.01) while HE subjects have demonstrated higher papillae density (46.4 vs 40.5 n/cm2, P = 0.02). Histo-morphometric analysis did not reveal appreciable modifications in the total papilla thickness, boundaries or surface between the experimental groups. In conclusion, our results contribute to efforts to analyse the factors affecting feed efficiency at the ruminal level. Propionate production, papillae morphology and a few bacterial genera certainly play a role in this regard, although not a decisive one. Residual feed intake (RFI), a widespread index used to measure animal feed efficiency, is influenced by various individual biological factors related to inter-animal variation that need to be assessed. Herein, 30 Simmental bulls, raised under the same farm conditions, were divided on the basis of RFI values into a high efficient group (HE, RFI = - 1.18 ± 0.33 kg DM/d, n = 15) and a low efficient group (LE, RFI = 0.92 ± 0.35 kg DM/d, n = 15). Subsequently, bulls were slaughtered at an average BW of 734 ± 39.4 kg. Their ruminal fermentation traits were analysed immediately after slaughtering and after 24 h of in vitro incubation. Furthermore, ruminal micro-biota composition and ruminal papillae morphology were examined. The LE group exhibited a higher propionate concentration as a percentage of total volatile fatty acids (17.3 vs 16.1%, P = 0.04) in the rumen fluid collected during slaughtering, which was also confirmed after in vitro fermentation (16.6 vs 15.4% respectively for LE and HE, P = 0.01). This phenomenon resulted in a significant alteration in the acetate-to-propionate ratio (A:P) with higher values for the HE group, both after slaughter (4.01 vs 3.66, P = 0.02) and after in vitro incubation (3.78 vs 3.66, P = 0.02). Methane production was similar in both groups either as absolute production (227 vs 218 mL for HE and LE, respectively) or expressed as a percentage of total gas (approximately 22%). Even if significant differences (P < 0.20) in the relative abundance of some bacterial genera were observed for the two RFI groups, no significant variations were observed in the alpha (Shannon index) and beta (Bray-Curtis index) diversity. Considering the papillae morphology, the LE subjects have shown higher length values (6.26 vs 4.90 mm, P < 0.01) while HE subjects have demonstrated higher papillae density (46.4 vs 40.5 n/cm , P = 0.02). Histo-morphometric analysis did not reveal appreciable modifications in the total papilla thickness, boundaries or surface between the experimental groups. In conclusion, our results contribute to efforts to analyse the factors affecting feed efficiency at the ruminal level. Propionate production, papillae morphology and a few bacterial genera certainly play a role in this regard, although not a decisive one. Residual feed intake (RFI), a widespread index used to measure animal feed efficiency, is influenced by various individual biological factors related to inter-animal variation that need to be assessed. Herein, 30 Simmental bulls, raised under the same farm conditions, were divided on the basis of RFI values into a high efficient group (HE, RFI = − 1.18 ± 0.33 kg DM/d, n = 15) and a low efficient group (LE, RFI = 0.92 ± 0.35 kg DM/d, n = 15). Subsequently, bulls were slaughtered at an average BW of 734 ± 39.4 kg. Their ruminal fermentation traits were analysed immediately after slaughtering and after 24 h of in vitro incubation. Furthermore, ruminal micro-biota composition and ruminal papillae morphology were examined. The LE group exhibited a higher propionate concentration as a percentage of total volatile fatty acids (17.3 vs 16.1%, P = 0.04) in the rumen fluid collected during slaughtering, which was also confirmed after in vitro fermentation (16.6 vs 15.4% respectively for LE and HE, P = 0.01). This phenomenon resulted in a significant alteration in the acetate−to−propionate ratio (A:P) with higher values for the HE group, both after slaughter (4.01 vs 3.66, P = 0.02) and after in vitro incubation (3.78 vs 3.66, P = 0.02). Methane production was similar in both groups either as absolute production (227 vs 218 mL for HE and LE, respectively) or expressed as a percentage of total gas (approximately 22%). Even if significant differences (P < 0.20) in the relative abundance of some bacterial genera were observed for the two RFI groups, no significant variations were observed in the alpha (Shannon index) and beta (Bray–Curtis index) diversity. Considering the papillae morphology, the LE subjects have shown higher length values (6.26 vs 4.90 mm, P < 0.01) while HE subjects have demonstrated higher papillae density (46.4 vs 40.5 n/cm², P = 0.02). Histo-morphometric analysis did not reveal appreciable modifications in the total papilla thickness, boundaries or surface between the experimental groups. In conclusion, our results contribute to efforts to analyse the factors affecting feed efficiency at the ruminal level. Propionate production, papillae morphology and a few bacterial genera certainly play a role in this regard, although not a decisive one. |
ArticleNumber | 101149 |
Author | Braidot, M. Beraldo, P. Spanghero, M. Romanzin, A. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: A. surname: Romanzin fullname: Romanzin, A. – sequence: 2 givenname: M. surname: Braidot fullname: Braidot, M. email: matteo.braidot@uniud.it – sequence: 3 givenname: P. surname: Beraldo fullname: Beraldo, P. – sequence: 4 givenname: M. surname: Spanghero fullname: Spanghero, M. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38663151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkktv1TAQhS1URB_wDxDyks292PErYYGEqgKVKiHxkNhZjj2--JLEwU5uxb_HadouumhXtkffOWOdmVN0NMQBEHpNyZYSKt_tt2YIvem2Fan4UqK8eYZOqBJ0o1j16-j-TukxOs15T4hoKOcv0DGrpWRU0BM0f5t7GLCHVI7JTCEOeDTJ9DBBytgMrjzH0HUGsIMDdHFcQBwG_D30N5oO71K8DsMOt3PXZXwdpt_YhQOk3UImyMHNhfIArugm8wdeoufedBle3Z5n6Oenix_nXzZXXz9fnn-82lhB1LSRyvLKNLUHCjXwSrG2AkIZ9YowykhjHBOmrilQyWzTSu6ZMdISJj23TrAzdLn6umj2ekwlr_RPRxP0TSGmnTZpCrYDLWvqSyO3dOM1gxYqp5SrfMVMrUhdvN6uXmOKf2fIk-5DtlCSGSDOWZc8mRBKSPE0SrhqeEXrpqBvbtG57cHd__FuQgV4vwI2xZwTeG3DOqcpmdBpSvSyDnqv13XQyzrodR2KmD8Q3_k_IfuwyqDM5hAg6WwDDBZcSGCnEl543OA__hbRYA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anifeedsci_2025_116273 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40813_024_00391_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_jpn_14092 |
Cites_doi | 10.2527/jas.2013-7438 10.1093/jas/skz080 10.1128/AEM.00061-17 10.1186/2049-1891-5-41 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.02.007 10.1111/jpn.13818 10.3168/jds.2017-14278 10.1186/s40104-018-0283-8 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100558 10.2527/jas1963.222486x 10.2527/jas.2015-0080 10.1128/AEM.00720-15 10.1128/AEM.05114-11 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02648 10.1017/S1751731118001489 10.1017/S1751731119003252 10.1186/s40104-021-00599-7 10.3390/ani12151966 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1119887 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104761 10.3168/jds.2009-2929 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01343.x 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.002 10.3168/jds.2016-12206 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.12.001 10.1126/science.1205760 10.2527/jas.2011-4245 10.1071/EA02220 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115471 10.1079/AHRR200237 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73283-X 10.2527/jas.2016-0579 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01229 10.2527/jas.2013-6956 10.3390/microorganisms7100410 10.2527/jas.2010-3774 10.1186/1751-0147-55-9 10.3390/microorganisms8081160 10.1093/jas/skz195 10.2527/1995.7382483x 10.1371/journal.pone.0091864 10.1186/s40168-022-01453-2 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00123 10.1111/jpn.13780 10.1017/S0021859600086305 10.1080/1828051X.2022.2146006 10.3168/jds.2014-8374 10.1371/journal.pone.0236118 10.1128/AEM.07759-11 10.1093/tas/txad054 10.1017/S1751731113000888 10.1016/j.animal.2023.101013 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.004 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01981 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03217 10.1128/AEM.02815-08 10.1017/S1751731119003100 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02526 10.1080/1745039X.2023.2282348 10.1071/AN20344 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104525 10.2527/2006.841145x 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.02.001 10.3168/jds.2017-12675 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01842 10.1017/S1751731118000976 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.12.024 10.1017/S1751731117002750 10.3168/jds.2015-9837 10.3168/jds.2013-6700 10.3168/jds.2021-21591 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.04.035 10.3390/microorganisms9122625 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01116 10.1080/17450390109386185 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 The Author(s) Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 The Author(s) – notice: Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 7S9 L.6 DOA |
DOI | 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed AGRICOLA |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1751-732X |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_681f8fed98fe483ebe2d77d2f23a8708 38663151 10_1016_j_animal_2024_101149 S1751731124000806 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -E. .FH 0E1 0R~ 0SF 23M 3V. 4.4 5GY 5VS 6I. 74X 74Y 7X7 7~V 88A 88E 8CJ 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AAAZR AABES AABWE AACJH AAEDW AAEED AAFTH AAFWJ AAGFV AAKTX AARAB AATID AAUKB AAXUO ABBXD ABFBI ABKKG ABKMT ABMWE ABQTM ABROB ABUWG ABWCF ABZCX ACBEK ACBMC ACCHT ACGFS ACIMK ACPRK ACQFJ ACQPF ACREK ACUIJ ACUYZ ACWGA ACZBM ACZUX ADBBV ADFEC ADGEJ ADOCW ADOVH AEBAK AEHGV AENEX AENGE AEXQZ AEYYC AFFUJ AFKQG AFKRA AFLOS AFLVW AFPKN AFRAH AFUTZ AGOOT AHLTW AHMBA AHQXX AIGNW AIHIV AIOIP AISIE AJ7 AJCYY AJPFC AJQAS AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWZO AMRAJ ANPSP ARABE ATUCA AUXHV AZGZS BBLKV BBNVY BENPR BGHMG BHPHI BMAJL BPHCQ BRIRG BVXVI C0O CAG CBIIA CCPQU CFAFE COF CS3 CTKSN D1J DC4 DIK DOHLZ EBS EJD F5P FDB FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ HG- HMCUK HST HZ~ I.6 IH6 IOEEP IS6 I~P J36 J38 J3A JHPGK JKPOH JQKCU JVRFK KCGVB KFECR L98 LK8 LW7 M-V M0L M1P M7P NIKVX O9- PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X RAMDC RCA RR0 S6- S6U SAAAG SY4 T9M TR2 UKHRP UT1 UU6 WQ3 WXY WYP Y6R ZYDXJ ~KM AAHBH AALRI AAYWO AAYXX ABGDZ ABVKB ACVFH ADCNI ADVLN AEUPX AEUYN AFJKZ AFPUW AIGII AITUG AKBMS AKYEP ALIPV APXCP CITATION PHGZM PHGZT NPM 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-67c42a98fe1e8e4273b2e0131f7031309ad35a881e163c9b64f3aa6c036f4cd53 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1751-7311 1751-732X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:26:34 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:52:07 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:49:28 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:06:43 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:47:45 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:10 EDT 2025 Sat Apr 27 15:44:13 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | Fermentative traits Beef cattle Feed efficiency Ruminal microbiota Histo-morphometry |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article under the CC BY license. Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c507t-67c42a98fe1e8e4273b2e0131f7031309ad35a881e163c9b64f3aa6c036f4cd53 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/681f8fed98fe483ebe2d77d2f23a8708 |
PMID | 38663151 |
PQID | 3047942189 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_681f8fed98fe483ebe2d77d2f23a8708 proquest_miscellaneous_3153557565 proquest_miscellaneous_3047942189 pubmed_primary_38663151 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_animal_2024_101149 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2024_101149 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_animal_2024_101149 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2024 text: 2024-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Animal (Cambridge, England) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Animal |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V – name: Elsevier |
References | Levy, Jami (b0230) 2018; 9 Costa-Roura, Mata, Blanco, Casasús, Balcells, Seradj (b0075) 2021; 62 Romanzin, Florit, Degano, Spanghero (b0360) 2022; 21 Spanghero, Mason, Zanfi, Nikulina (b0365) 2017; 196 Cantalapiedra-Hijar, Abo-Ismail, Carstens, Guan, Hegarty, Kenny, McGee, Plastow, Relling, Ortigues-Marty (b0055) 2018; 12 Auffret, Stewart, Dewhurst, Duthie, Watson, Roehe (b0015) 2020; 11 Lesmeister, Tozer, Heinrichs (b0225) 2004; 87 Makkar, H.P.S., Beeve, D., 2013. Optimization of feed use efficiency in ruminant production systems. In: Proceedings of the FAO Symposium, 27 November 2012, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1-93. Hobson, Stewart (b0160) 1997 Lam, Munro, Zhou, Guan, Schenkel, Steele, Miller, Montanholi (b0210) 2018; 12 Mentschel, Leiser, Mülling, Pfarrer, Claus (b0295) 2001; 55 Dieho, Bannink, Geurts, Schonewille, Gort, Dijkstra (b0095) 2016; 99 Koch, Swiger, Chambers, Gregory (b0195) 1963; 22 Zhong, Xue, Liu (b0415) 2018; 9 Liu, Wu, Liu, Chai, Meng, Zhou (b0245) 2019; 10 McGovern, Kenny, McCabe, Fitzsimons, McGee, Kelly, Waters (b0280) 2018; 9 Menke, Raab, Salewski, Steingass, Fritz, Schneider (b0290) 1979; 93 Welch, Lourenço, Seidel, Krause, Rothrock, Pringle, Callaway (b0390) 2021; 9 Zhang, Yang, Xu, Wang, Li, Li, Yao (b0410) 2023; 13 Qiu, Gao, Gao, Rahman, He, Cao, Su (b0340) 2019; 7 Krueger, Carstens, Gomez, Bourg, Lancaster, Slay, Miller, Anderson, Horrocks, Kreuger, Forbes (b0200) 2009; 87 Lin, Lai, Zhang, Zhu, Mao (b0240) 2023; 11 Guarnido-Lopez, Marty, Salis, Chantelauze, Bes, Nozière, Cantalapiedra-Hijar (b0140) 2022; 16 Carberry, Kenny, Han, McCabe, Waters (b0060) 2012; 78 McDonnell, Hart, Boland, Kelly, McGee, Kenny (b0275) 2016; 94 Steele, Garcia, Lowerison, Gordon, Metcalf, Hurtig (b0380) 2014; 97 Newbold, Ramos-Morales (b0305) 2020; 14 Fitzsimons, Kenny, Deighton, Fahey, McGee (b0115) 2013; 91 Firkins, Yu, Park, Plank (b0110) 2020; 11 Wang, Zhang, Yu, Xu, Zheng, Zhao, Huang, Wang (b0385) 2021; 7 Berry, Crowley (b0035) 2012; 90 Braidot, Sarnataro, Romanzin, Spanghero (b0040) 2023; 107 Zhang, Li, Chen, Guan (b0405) 2022; 12 . Dehority (b0090) 2003 Elolimy, Abdel-Hamied, Hu, McCann, Shike, Loor (b0105) 2019; 97 Fregulia, Neves, Dias, Campos (b0125) 2021; 254 Spanghero, Braidot, Sarnataro, Fabro, Piani, Gallo (b0375) 2023; 107 Gäbel, Aschenbach, Müller (b0130) 2002; 3 Yu, Cai, Zhang, Yang, Wang, Zhang, Guan, Qi (b0400) 2020; 8 Rehemujiang, Yusuf, Ma, Diao, Kong, Kang, Tu (b0350) 2023; 14 Guan, Nkrumah, Basarab, Moore (b0135) 2008; 288 Beauchemin, Ungerfeld, Eckard, Wang (b0030) 2020; 14 Bannik, France, Lopez, Gerrits, Kebreab, Tamminga, Dijkstra (b0020) 2008; 143 Malhi, Gui, Yao, Aschenbach, Gäbel, Shen (b0265) 2013; 96 Cabezas-Garcia, Krizsan, Shingfield, Huhtanen (b0050) 2017; 100 Jewell, McCormick, Odt, Weimer, Suen (b0170) 2015; 81 Fitzsimons, Kenny, Fahey, McGee (b0120) 2014; 92 Johnson, Carstens, Krueger, Lancaster, Brown, Tedeschi, Anderson, Johnson, Brosh (b0175) 2019; 97 Herd, Archer, Arthur (b0145) 2003; 81 Pereira, Cruz, De Beni Arrigoni, Rigueiro, Silva, Carrara, Santos, Cursino, Millen (b0330) 2016; 94 Braidot, Sarnataro, Spanghero (b0045) 2023; 77 Montanholi, Fontoura, Swanson, Coomber, Yamashiro, Miller (b0300) 2013; 55 Lopes, De Souza Duarte, La Reau, Chaves, Mendes, Detmann, Bento, Mercadante, Bonilha, Suen, Mantovani (b0255) 2021; 12 Coppa, Martin, Bes, Ragionieri, Ravanetti, Lund, Cantalapiedra-Hijar, Nozière (b0070) 2023; 17 Lage, Coelho, Neto, Malacco, Rodrigues, Sacramento, Teixeira, Machado, Pereira, Tomich, Campos (b0205) 2020; 15 Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., O'Hara, B., Simpson, G., Solymos, P., Stevens, H., Wagner, H., 2015. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. Version 2.5-6. Retrieved 5 July 2019 from Romanzin, Degano, Vicario, Spanghero (b0355) 2021; 249 Basarab, Beauchemin, Baron, Ominski, Guan, Miller, Crowley (b0025) 2013; 7 Yan, Mayne, Gordon, Porter, Agnew, Patterson, Ferris, Kilpatrick (b0395) 2010; 93 Li, Guan (b0235) 2017; 83 Danielsson, Ramin, Bertilsson, Lund, Huhtanen (b0085) 2017; 100 Lawrence, Kenny, Earley, McGee (b0220) 2013; 152 Johnson, Johnson (b0180) 1995; 73 McLoughlin, Spillane, Claffey, Smith, O’Rourke, Diskin, Waters (b0285) 2020; 11 McCann, Wiley, Forbes, Rouquette, Tedeschi (b0270) 2014; 9 Zhou, Hernandez-Sanabria, Guan (b0420) 2009; 75 Alves, Granja-Salcedo, Messana, De Souza, Ganga, Colovate, Kishi, Berchielli (b0005) 2021; 67 Pope, Smith, Denman, Tringe, Barry, Hugenholtz, McSweeney, McHardy, Morrison (b0335) 2011; 333 Elolimy, Abdelmegeid, McCann, Shike, Loor (b0100) 2018; 9 Kenny, Fitzsimons, Waters, McGee (b0185) 2018; 12 Nkrumah, Okine, Mathison, Schmid, Li, Basarab, Price, Wang, Moore (b0310) 2006; 84 Carberry, Kenny, Kelly, Waters (b0065) 2014; 5 Perea, Perz, Olivo, Williams, Lachman, Ishaq, Thomson, Yeoman (b0325) 2017; 95 Olijhoek, Løvendahl, Lassen, Hellwing, Höglund, Weisbjerg, Noel, Mclean, Højberg, Lund (b0320) 2018; 101 Idowu, Taiwo, Sidney, Olanrewaju, Pech-Cervantes, Estrada-Reyes, Wilson, Ogunade (b0165) 2023; 7 Hernandez-Sanabria, Goonewardene, Wang, Durunna, Moore, Guan (b0155) 2012; 78 Liu, Wu, Chen, Liu, Meng, Zhou (b0250) 2022; 9 Spanghero, Braidot, Fabro, Romanzin (b0370) 2022; 293 Ragionieri, Cacchioli, Ravanetti, Botti, Ivanovska, Panu, Righi, Quarantelli, Gazza (b0345) 2016; 207 Kern, Lindholm-Perry, Freetly, Kuehn, Rule, Ludden (b0190) 2016; 187 Herd, Oddy, Richardson (b0150) 2004; 44 Arce-Cordero, Fan, Monteiro, Dai, Jeong, Faciola (b0010) 2022; 105 Dai, Faciola (b0080) 2019; 10 Lawrence, Kenny, Earley, Crews, McGee (b0215) 2011; 89 Alves (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0005) 2021; 67 Lesmeister (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0225) 2004; 87 McGovern (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0280) 2018; 9 Fitzsimons (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0115) 2013; 91 McDonnell (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0275) 2016; 94 Levy (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0230) 2018; 9 McLoughlin (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0285) 2020; 11 Rehemujiang (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0350) 2023; 14 Spanghero (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0370) 2022; 293 Lawrence (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0215) 2011; 89 Lawrence (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0220) 2013; 152 Pereira (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0330) 2016; 94 Romanzin (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0360) 2022; 21 Dai (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0080) 2019; 10 Koch (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0195) 1963; 22 Guarnido-Lopez (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0140) 2022; 16 Carberry (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0060) 2012; 78 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0315 Johnson (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0175) 2019; 97 Coppa (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0070) 2023; 17 Firkins (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0110) 2020; 11 Kern (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0190) 2016; 187 Zhang (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0410) 2023; 13 Hernandez-Sanabria (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0155) 2012; 78 Johnson (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0180) 1995; 73 Braidot (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0040) 2023; 107 Gäbel (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0130) 2002; 3 Elolimy (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0105) 2019; 97 Yu (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0400) 2020; 8 Fitzsimons (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0120) 2014; 92 Menke (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0290) 1979; 93 Cantalapiedra-Hijar (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0055) 2018; 12 Kenny (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0185) 2018; 12 Zhou (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0420) 2009; 75 Costa-Roura (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0075) 2021; 62 Fregulia (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0125) 2021; 254 Spanghero (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0365) 2017; 196 Dieho (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0095) 2016; 99 Braidot (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0045) 2023; 77 Herd (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0145) 2003; 81 Dehority (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0090) 2003 Liu (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0250) 2022; 9 Steele (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0380) 2014; 97 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0260 Hobson (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0160) 1997 Bannik (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0020) 2008; 143 Berry (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0035) 2012; 90 Danielsson (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0085) 2017; 100 Mentschel (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0295) 2001; 55 Jewell (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0170) 2015; 81 Lin (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0240) 2023; 11 Zhang (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0405) 2022; 12 Elolimy (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0100) 2018; 9 Wang (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0385) 2021; 7 Auffret (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0015) 2020; 11 Carberry (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0065) 2014; 5 Beauchemin (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0030) 2020; 14 Lam (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0210) 2018; 12 Yan (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0395) 2010; 93 Lopes (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0255) 2021; 12 Ragionieri (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0345) 2016; 207 Newbold (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0305) 2020; 14 McCann (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0270) 2014; 9 Pope (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0335) 2011; 333 Herd (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0150) 2004; 44 Olijhoek (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0320) 2018; 101 Zhong (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0415) 2018; 9 Montanholi (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0300) 2013; 55 Welch (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0390) 2021; 9 Malhi (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0265) 2013; 96 Lage (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0205) 2020; 15 Basarab (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0025) 2013; 7 Romanzin (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0355) 2021; 249 Cabezas-Garcia (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0050) 2017; 100 Perea (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0325) 2017; 95 Guan (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0135) 2008; 288 Liu (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0245) 2019; 10 Spanghero (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0375) 2023; 107 Nkrumah (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0310) 2006; 84 Li (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0235) 2017; 83 Arce-Cordero (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0010) 2022; 105 Qiu (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0340) 2019; 7 Idowu (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0165) 2023; 7 Krueger (10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0200) 2009; 87 |
References_xml | – volume: 83 start-page: e00061 year: 2017 end-page: e117 ident: b0235 article-title: Metatranscriptomic profiling reveals linkages between the active rumen microbiome and feed efficiency in beef cattle publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology – volume: 14 start-page: s78 year: 2020 end-page: s86 ident: b0305 article-title: Review: ruminal microbiome and microbial metabolome: effects of diet and ruminant host publication-title: Animal – volume: 55 start-page: 85 year: 2001 end-page: 102 ident: b0295 article-title: Butyric acid stimulates rumen mucosa development in the calf mainly by a reduction of apoptosis publication-title: Archiv Für Tierernährung – volume: 93 start-page: 2630 year: 2010 end-page: 2638 ident: b0395 article-title: Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – year: 1997 ident: b0160 publication-title: The Rumen microbial ecosystem – volume: 12 start-page: 1966 year: 2022 ident: b0405 article-title: The effects of breed and residual feed intake divergence on the abundance and active population of rumen microbiota in beef cattle publication-title: Animals – volume: 187 start-page: 24 year: 2016 end-page: 30 ident: b0190 article-title: Rumen papillae morphology of beef steers relative to gain and feed intake and the association of volatile fatty acids with kallikrein gene expression publication-title: Livestock Science – reference: Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., O'Hara, B., Simpson, G., Solymos, P., Stevens, H., Wagner, H., 2015. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. Version 2.5-6. Retrieved 5 July 2019 from: – volume: 97 start-page: 7691 year: 2014 end-page: 7696 ident: b0380 article-title: Technical note: three-dimensional imaging of rumen tissue for morphometric analysis using micro-computed tomography publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 9 start-page: 1842 year: 2018 ident: b0280 article-title: 16S RRNA sequencing reveals relationship between potent cellulolytic genera and feed efficiency in the rumen of bulls publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 14 start-page: s2 year: 2020 end-page: s16 ident: b0030 article-title: Review: fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation publication-title: Animal – volume: 207 start-page: 97 year: 2016 end-page: 108 ident: b0345 article-title: Effect of the supplementation with a blend containing short and medium chain fatty acid monoglycerides in milk replacer on rumen papillae development in weaning calves publication-title: Annals of Anatomy – volume: 3 start-page: 15 year: 2002 end-page: 30 ident: b0130 article-title: Transfer of energy substrates across the ruminal epithelium: implications and limitations publication-title: Animal Health Research Reviews – volume: 13 start-page: 289 year: 2023 end-page: 301 ident: b0410 article-title: Active dry yeast supplementation benefits ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, blood immunoglobulins, and growth performance in young dairy goats, but not for intermittent supplementation publication-title: Animal Nutrition – volume: 97 start-page: 2181 year: 2019 end-page: 2187 ident: b0105 article-title: Rapid Communication: residual feed intake in beef cattle is associated with differences in protein turnover and nutrient transporters in ruminal epithelium publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 21 start-page: 1611 year: 2022 end-page: 1621 ident: b0360 article-title: Feeding efficiency and behaviour of growing bulls from the main Italian dual-purpose breeds publication-title: Italian Journal of Animal Science – volume: 67 year: 2021 ident: b0005 article-title: Rumen bacterial diversity in relation to nitrogen retention in beef cattle publication-title: Anaerobe – volume: 11 start-page: 10 year: 2023 ident: b0240 article-title: The gastrointestinal microbiome in dairy cattle is constrained by the deterministic driver of the region and the modified effect of diet publication-title: Microbiome – volume: 96 start-page: 7603 year: 2013 end-page: 7616 ident: b0265 article-title: Increased papillae growth and enhanced short-chain fatty acid absorption in the rumen of goats are associated with transient increases in cyclin D1 expression after ruminal butyrate infusion publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 7 start-page: txad054 year: 2023 ident: b0165 article-title: The differential plasma and ruminal metabolic pathways and ruminal bacterial taxa associated with divergent residual body weight gain phenotype in crossbred beef steers publication-title: Translational Animal Science – volume: 12 start-page: 1442 year: 2018 end-page: 1450 ident: b0210 article-title: Associations of rumen parameters with feed efficiency and sampling routine in beef cattle publication-title: Animal – volume: 8 start-page: 1160 year: 2020 ident: b0400 article-title: Effects of thymol supplementation on goat rumen fermentation and rumen microbiota in vitro publication-title: Microorganisms – volume: 11 start-page: 1229 year: 2020 ident: b0015 article-title: Identification of microbial genetic capacities and potential mechanisms within the rumen microbiome explaining differences in beef cattle feed efficiency publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 78 start-page: 1203 year: 2012 end-page: 1214 ident: b0155 article-title: Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology – volume: 78 start-page: 4949 year: 2012 end-page: 4958 ident: b0060 article-title: Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology – volume: 73 start-page: 2483 year: 1995 end-page: 2492 ident: b0180 article-title: Methane emissions from cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 15 start-page: e0236118 year: 2020 ident: b0205 article-title: Relationship between feed efficiency indexes and thermography, blood, and ruminal parameters in pre-weaning dairy heifers publication-title: PLOS ONE – volume: 62 start-page: 1344 year: 2021 end-page: 1352 ident: b0075 article-title: Ruminal microbiota is associated with feed-efficiency phenotype of fattening bulls fed high-concentrate diets publication-title: Animal Production Science – volume: 107 start-page: 747 year: 2023 end-page: 753 ident: b0040 article-title: A new equipment for continuous measurement of methane production in a batch in vitro rumen system publication-title: Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition – volume: 11 start-page: 1981 year: 2020 ident: b0285 article-title: Rumen microbiome composition is altered in sheep divergent in feed efficiency publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 12 start-page: 1815 year: 2018 end-page: 1826 ident: b0185 article-title: Invited review: improving feed efficiency of beef cattle – the current state of the art and future challenges publication-title: Animal – volume: 81 start-page: E9 year: 2003 end-page: E17 ident: b0145 article-title: Reducing the cost of beef production through genetic improvement in residual feed intake: opportunity and challenges to application publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 84 start-page: 145 year: 2006 end-page: 153 ident: b0310 article-title: Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 288 start-page: 85 year: 2008 end-page: 91 ident: b0135 article-title: Linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle’s feed efficiency publication-title: FEMS Microbiology Letters – volume: 91 start-page: 5789 year: 2013 end-page: 5800 ident: b0115 article-title: Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 12 start-page: 79 year: 2021 ident: b0255 article-title: Assessing the relationship between the rumen microbiota and feed efficiency in Nellore steers publication-title: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology – volume: 9 start-page: e91864 year: 2014 ident: b0270 article-title: Relationship between the rumen microbiome and residual feed intake-efficiency of brahman bulls stocked on bermudagrass pastures publication-title: PLOS ONE – volume: 55 start-page: 9 year: 2013 ident: b0300 article-title: Small intestine histomorphometry of beef cattle with divergent feed efficiency publication-title: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica – volume: 101 start-page: 9926 year: 2018 end-page: 9940 ident: b0320 article-title: Methane production, rumen fermentation, and diet digestibility of Holstein and Jersey dairy cows being divergent in residual feed intake and fed at 2 forage-to-concentrate ratios publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 44 start-page: 423 year: 2004 ident: b0150 article-title: Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. review of potential mechanisms publication-title: Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture – volume: 333 start-page: 646 year: 2011 end-page: 648 ident: b0335 article-title: Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae implicated in low methane emissions from Tammar wallabies publication-title: Science – volume: 14 start-page: 1119887 year: 2023 ident: b0350 article-title: Fermented cottonseed and rapeseed meals outperform soybean meal in improving performance, rumen fermentation, and bacterial composition in Hu sheep publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 97 start-page: 3550 year: 2019 end-page: 3561 ident: b0175 article-title: Associations between residual feed intake and apparent nutrient digestibility, in vitro methane-producing activity, and volatile fatty acid concentrations in growing beef cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 11 start-page: 123 year: 2020 ident: b0110 article-title: Extending Burk Dehority’s perspectives on the role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 17 year: 2023 ident: b0070 article-title: Relationship between residual feed intake and digestive traits of fattening bulls fed grass silage- or maize silage-based diets publication-title: Animal – volume: 254 year: 2021 ident: b0125 article-title: A review of rumen parameters in bovines with divergent feed efficiencies: what do these parameters tell us about improving animal productivity and sustainability? publication-title: Livestock Science – volume: 196 start-page: 14 year: 2017 end-page: 21 ident: b0365 article-title: Effect of diets differing in protein concentration (low vs medium) and nitrogen source (urea vs soybean meal) on in vitro rumen fermentation and on performance of finishing Italian Simmental bulls publication-title: Livestock Science – volume: 5 start-page: 41 year: 2014 ident: b0065 article-title: Quantitative analysis of ruminal methanogenic microbial populations in beef cattle divergent in phenotypic residual feed intake (RFI) offered contrasting diets publication-title: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology – volume: 9 start-page: 2526 year: 2018 ident: b0230 article-title: Exploring the prokaryotic community associated with the rumen ciliate protozoa population publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 249 year: 2021 ident: b0355 article-title: Feeding efficiency and behaviors of Simmental bulls selected for high growth capacity: comparison of bulls with high vs. low residual feed intake publication-title: Livestock Science – volume: 9 start-page: 3217 year: 2018 ident: b0415 article-title: Composition of rumen bacterial community in dairy cows with different levels of somatic cell counts publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 75 start-page: 6524 year: 2009 end-page: 6533 ident: b0420 article-title: Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology – year: 2003 ident: b0090 article-title: Rumen Microbiology – volume: 107 start-page: 1311 year: 2023 end-page: 1319 ident: b0375 article-title: In vitro aflatoxins recovery after changing buffer or protozoa concentrations in the rumen fermentation fluid publication-title: Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition – volume: 7 start-page: 49 year: 2021 end-page: 55 ident: b0385 article-title: Ruminal microbiota–host interaction and its effect on nutrient metabolism publication-title: Animal Nutrition – volume: 105 start-page: 4128 year: 2022 end-page: 4143 ident: b0010 article-title: Effects of choline chloride on the ruminal microbiome at 2 dietary neutral detergent fiber concentrations in continuous culture publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 99 start-page: 2339 year: 2016 end-page: 2352 ident: b0095 article-title: Morphological adaptation of rumen papillae during the dry period and early lactation as affected by rate of increase of concentrate allowance publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 87 start-page: 1336 year: 2004 end-page: 1344 ident: b0225 article-title: Development and analysis of a rumen tissue sampling procedure publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 7 start-page: 303 year: 2013 end-page: 315 ident: b0025 article-title: Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production publication-title: Animal – volume: 9 start-page: 67 year: 2018 ident: b0100 article-title: Residual feed intake in beef cattle and its association with carcass traits, ruminal solid-fraction bacteria, and epithelium gene expression publication-title: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology – volume: 87 start-page: 129 year: 2009 ident: b0200 article-title: Relationships between residual feed intake and apparent nutrient digestibility, in vitro methane producing activity and VFA concentrations in growing Brangus heifers publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 9 year: 2022 ident: b0250 article-title: Rumen microbiome and metabolome of high and low residual feed intake Angus Heifers publication-title: Frontiers in Veterinary Science – volume: 152 start-page: 154 year: 2013 end-page: 166 ident: b0220 article-title: Intake of conserved and grazed grass and performance traits in beef suckler cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake publication-title: Livestock Science – volume: 10 start-page: 1116 year: 2019 ident: b0245 article-title: Dynamic alterations in yak rumen bacteria community and metabolome characteristics in response to feed type publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 81 start-page: 4697 year: 2015 end-page: 4710 ident: b0170 article-title: Ruminal bacterial community composition in dairy cows is dynamic over the course of two lactations and correlates with feed efficiency publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology – volume: 93 start-page: 217 year: 1979 end-page: 222 ident: b0290 article-title: The estimation of the digestibility and metabolisable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor publication-title: Journal of Agricultural Science – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2019 end-page: 16 ident: b0080 article-title: Evaluating strategies to reduce ruminal protozoa and their impacts on nutrient utilization and animal performance in ruminants – a meta-analysis publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 12 start-page: s321 year: 2018 end-page: s335 ident: b0055 article-title: Review: biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle publication-title: Animal – volume: 9 start-page: 2625 year: 2021 ident: b0390 article-title: The impact of Pre-Slaughter fasting on the ruminal microbial population of commercial angus steers publication-title: Microorganisms – volume: 95 start-page: 2585 year: 2017 ident: b0325 article-title: Feed efficiency phenotypes in lambs involve changes in ruminal, colonic, and small-intestine-located microbiota publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 94 start-page: 4287 year: 2016 end-page: 4296 ident: b0330 article-title: Relationships of feedlot performance, feeding behavior, rumen morphometrics, and carcass characteristics of Nellore cattle differing in phenotypic residual feed intake publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 77 start-page: 512 year: 2023 end-page: 523 ident: b0045 article-title: Dynamics of in vitro rumen methane production after nitrate addition publication-title: Archives of Animal Nutrition – reference: . – volume: 22 start-page: 486 year: 1963 end-page: 494 ident: b0195 article-title: Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 7 start-page: 410 year: 2019 ident: b0340 article-title: Temporal dynamics in rumen bacterial community composition of finishing steers during an adaptation period of three months publication-title: Microorganisms – reference: Makkar, H.P.S., Beeve, D., 2013. Optimization of feed use efficiency in ruminant production systems. In: Proceedings of the FAO Symposium, 27 November 2012, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1-93. – volume: 293 year: 2022 ident: b0370 article-title: A meta-analysis on the relationship between rumen fermentation parameters and protozoa counts in in vitro batch experiments publication-title: Animal Feed Science and Technology – volume: 16 year: 2022 ident: b0140 article-title: Protein metabolism, body composition and oxygen consumption in young bulls divergent in residual feed intake offered two contrasting forage-based diets publication-title: Animal – volume: 100 start-page: 8881 year: 2017 end-page: 8894 ident: b0085 article-title: Evaluation of a gas in vitro system for predicting methane production in vivo publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 92 start-page: 2170 year: 2014 end-page: 2181 ident: b0120 article-title: Feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation, and performance of pregnant beef cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake offered grass silage publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 89 start-page: 3248 year: 2011 end-page: 3261 ident: b0215 article-title: Grass silage intake, rumen and blood variables, ultrasonic and body measurements, feeding behavior, and activity in pregnant beef heifers differing in phenotypic residual feed intake publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 100 start-page: 4409 year: 2017 end-page: 4424 ident: b0050 article-title: Between-cow variation in digestion and rumen fermentation variables associated with methane production publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 143 start-page: 3 year: 2008 end-page: 26 ident: b0020 article-title: Modelling the implications of feeding strategy on rumen fermentation and functioning of the rumen wall publication-title: Animal Feed Science and Technology – volume: 90 start-page: 109 year: 2012 end-page: 115 ident: b0035 article-title: Residual intake and body weight gain: a new measure of efficiency in growing cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 94 start-page: 1179 year: 2016 end-page: 1193 ident: b0275 article-title: Effect of divergence in phenotypic residual feed intake on methane emissions, ruminal fermentation, and apparent whole-tract digestibility of beef heifers across three contrasting diets publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 92 start-page: 2170 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0120 article-title: Feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation, and performance of pregnant beef cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake offered grass silage publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7438 – volume: 97 start-page: 2181 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0105 article-title: Rapid Communication: residual feed intake in beef cattle is associated with differences in protein turnover and nutrient transporters in ruminal epithelium publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.1093/jas/skz080 – volume: 83 start-page: e00061 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0235 article-title: Metatranscriptomic profiling reveals linkages between the active rumen microbiome and feed efficiency in beef cattle publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology doi: 10.1128/AEM.00061-17 – ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0315 – volume: 5 start-page: 41 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0065 article-title: Quantitative analysis of ruminal methanogenic microbial populations in beef cattle divergent in phenotypic residual feed intake (RFI) offered contrasting diets publication-title: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-5-41 – volume: 187 start-page: 24 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0190 article-title: Rumen papillae morphology of beef steers relative to gain and feed intake and the association of volatile fatty acids with kallikrein gene expression publication-title: Livestock Science doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.02.007 – volume: 107 start-page: 1311 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0375 article-title: In vitro aflatoxins recovery after changing buffer or protozoa concentrations in the rumen fermentation fluid publication-title: Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition doi: 10.1111/jpn.13818 – volume: 101 start-page: 9926 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0320 article-title: Methane production, rumen fermentation, and diet digestibility of Holstein and Jersey dairy cows being divergent in residual feed intake and fed at 2 forage-to-concentrate ratios publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14278 – volume: 9 start-page: 67 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0100 article-title: Residual feed intake in beef cattle and its association with carcass traits, ruminal solid-fraction bacteria, and epithelium gene expression publication-title: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0283-8 – volume: 16 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0140 article-title: Protein metabolism, body composition and oxygen consumption in young bulls divergent in residual feed intake offered two contrasting forage-based diets publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100558 – volume: 22 start-page: 486 year: 1963 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0195 article-title: Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/jas1963.222486x – volume: 94 start-page: 1179 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0275 article-title: Effect of divergence in phenotypic residual feed intake on methane emissions, ruminal fermentation, and apparent whole-tract digestibility of beef heifers across three contrasting diets publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0080 – volume: 87 start-page: 129 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0200 article-title: Relationships between residual feed intake and apparent nutrient digestibility, in vitro methane producing activity and VFA concentrations in growing Brangus heifers publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 81 start-page: 4697 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0170 article-title: Ruminal bacterial community composition in dairy cows is dynamic over the course of two lactations and correlates with feed efficiency publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology doi: 10.1128/AEM.00720-15 – volume: 78 start-page: 1203 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0155 article-title: Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology doi: 10.1128/AEM.05114-11 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0080 article-title: Evaluating strategies to reduce ruminal protozoa and their impacts on nutrient utilization and animal performance in ruminants – a meta-analysis publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02648 – volume: 12 start-page: s321 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0055 article-title: Review: biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1017/S1751731118001489 – volume: 14 start-page: s78 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0305 article-title: Review: ruminal microbiome and microbial metabolome: effects of diet and ruminant host publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1017/S1751731119003252 – ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0260 – volume: 12 start-page: 79 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0255 article-title: Assessing the relationship between the rumen microbiota and feed efficiency in Nellore steers publication-title: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00599-7 – volume: 12 start-page: 1966 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0405 article-title: The effects of breed and residual feed intake divergence on the abundance and active population of rumen microbiota in beef cattle publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani12151966 – volume: 67 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0005 article-title: Rumen bacterial diversity in relation to nitrogen retention in beef cattle publication-title: Anaerobe – volume: 14 start-page: 1119887 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0350 article-title: Fermented cottonseed and rapeseed meals outperform soybean meal in improving performance, rumen fermentation, and bacterial composition in Hu sheep publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1119887 – volume: 254 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0125 article-title: A review of rumen parameters in bovines with divergent feed efficiencies: what do these parameters tell us about improving animal productivity and sustainability? publication-title: Livestock Science doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104761 – volume: 93 start-page: 2630 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0395 article-title: Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2929 – volume: 288 start-page: 85 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0135 article-title: Linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle’s feed efficiency publication-title: FEMS Microbiology Letters doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01343.x – volume: 143 start-page: 3 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0020 article-title: Modelling the implications of feeding strategy on rumen fermentation and functioning of the rumen wall publication-title: Animal Feed Science and Technology doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.002 – volume: 9 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0250 article-title: Rumen microbiome and metabolome of high and low residual feed intake Angus Heifers publication-title: Frontiers in Veterinary Science – volume: 100 start-page: 4409 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0050 article-title: Between-cow variation in digestion and rumen fermentation variables associated with methane production publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12206 – volume: 7 start-page: 49 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0385 article-title: Ruminal microbiota–host interaction and its effect on nutrient metabolism publication-title: Animal Nutrition doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.12.001 – volume: 333 start-page: 646 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0335 article-title: Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae implicated in low methane emissions from Tammar wallabies publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1205760 – volume: 90 start-page: 109 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0035 article-title: Residual intake and body weight gain: a new measure of efficiency in growing cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4245 – volume: 44 start-page: 423 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0150 article-title: Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. review of potential mechanisms publication-title: Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture doi: 10.1071/EA02220 – volume: 293 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0370 article-title: A meta-analysis on the relationship between rumen fermentation parameters and protozoa counts in in vitro batch experiments publication-title: Animal Feed Science and Technology doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115471 – volume: 3 start-page: 15 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0130 article-title: Transfer of energy substrates across the ruminal epithelium: implications and limitations publication-title: Animal Health Research Reviews doi: 10.1079/AHRR200237 – volume: 87 start-page: 1336 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0225 article-title: Development and analysis of a rumen tissue sampling procedure publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73283-X – volume: 94 start-page: 4287 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0330 article-title: Relationships of feedlot performance, feeding behavior, rumen morphometrics, and carcass characteristics of Nellore cattle differing in phenotypic residual feed intake publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0579 – volume: 11 start-page: 1229 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0015 article-title: Identification of microbial genetic capacities and potential mechanisms within the rumen microbiome explaining differences in beef cattle feed efficiency publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01229 – volume: 91 start-page: 5789 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0115 article-title: Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6956 – volume: 7 start-page: 410 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0340 article-title: Temporal dynamics in rumen bacterial community composition of finishing steers during an adaptation period of three months publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100410 – volume: 89 start-page: 3248 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0215 article-title: Grass silage intake, rumen and blood variables, ultrasonic and body measurements, feeding behavior, and activity in pregnant beef heifers differing in phenotypic residual feed intake publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3774 – volume: 55 start-page: 9 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0300 article-title: Small intestine histomorphometry of beef cattle with divergent feed efficiency publication-title: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-55-9 – volume: 8 start-page: 1160 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0400 article-title: Effects of thymol supplementation on goat rumen fermentation and rumen microbiota in vitro publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8081160 – volume: 97 start-page: 3550 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0175 article-title: Associations between residual feed intake and apparent nutrient digestibility, in vitro methane-producing activity, and volatile fatty acid concentrations in growing beef cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.1093/jas/skz195 – volume: 73 start-page: 2483 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0180 article-title: Methane emissions from cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/1995.7382483x – volume: 9 start-page: e91864 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0270 article-title: Relationship between the rumen microbiome and residual feed intake-efficiency of brahman bulls stocked on bermudagrass pastures publication-title: PLOS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091864 – volume: 11 start-page: 10 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0240 article-title: The gastrointestinal microbiome in dairy cattle is constrained by the deterministic driver of the region and the modified effect of diet publication-title: Microbiome doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01453-2 – volume: 11 start-page: 123 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0110 article-title: Extending Burk Dehority’s perspectives on the role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00123 – volume: 107 start-page: 747 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0040 article-title: A new equipment for continuous measurement of methane production in a batch in vitro rumen system publication-title: Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition doi: 10.1111/jpn.13780 – volume: 93 start-page: 217 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0290 article-title: The estimation of the digestibility and metabolisable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor publication-title: Journal of Agricultural Science doi: 10.1017/S0021859600086305 – volume: 21 start-page: 1611 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0360 article-title: Feeding efficiency and behaviour of growing bulls from the main Italian dual-purpose breeds publication-title: Italian Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2022.2146006 – volume: 97 start-page: 7691 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0380 article-title: Technical note: three-dimensional imaging of rumen tissue for morphometric analysis using micro-computed tomography publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8374 – volume: 15 start-page: e0236118 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0205 article-title: Relationship between feed efficiency indexes and thermography, blood, and ruminal parameters in pre-weaning dairy heifers publication-title: PLOS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236118 – volume: 78 start-page: 4949 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0060 article-title: Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology doi: 10.1128/AEM.07759-11 – volume: 7 start-page: txad054 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0165 article-title: The differential plasma and ruminal metabolic pathways and ruminal bacterial taxa associated with divergent residual body weight gain phenotype in crossbred beef steers publication-title: Translational Animal Science doi: 10.1093/tas/txad054 – volume: 7 start-page: 303 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0025 article-title: Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1017/S1751731113000888 – volume: 17 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0070 article-title: Relationship between residual feed intake and digestive traits of fattening bulls fed grass silage- or maize silage-based diets publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.101013 – volume: 196 start-page: 14 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0365 article-title: Effect of diets differing in protein concentration (low vs medium) and nitrogen source (urea vs soybean meal) on in vitro rumen fermentation and on performance of finishing Italian Simmental bulls publication-title: Livestock Science doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.004 – volume: 11 start-page: 1981 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0285 article-title: Rumen microbiome composition is altered in sheep divergent in feed efficiency publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01981 – volume: 9 start-page: 3217 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0415 article-title: Composition of rumen bacterial community in dairy cows with different levels of somatic cell counts publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03217 – year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0160 – volume: 75 start-page: 6524 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0420 article-title: Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology doi: 10.1128/AEM.02815-08 – volume: 14 start-page: s2 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0030 article-title: Review: fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1017/S1751731119003100 – volume: 9 start-page: 2526 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0230 article-title: Exploring the prokaryotic community associated with the rumen ciliate protozoa population publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02526 – volume: 77 start-page: 512 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0045 article-title: Dynamics of in vitro rumen methane production after nitrate addition publication-title: Archives of Animal Nutrition doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2023.2282348 – volume: 62 start-page: 1344 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0075 article-title: Ruminal microbiota is associated with feed-efficiency phenotype of fattening bulls fed high-concentrate diets publication-title: Animal Production Science doi: 10.1071/AN20344 – volume: 81 start-page: E9 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0145 article-title: Reducing the cost of beef production through genetic improvement in residual feed intake: opportunity and challenges to application publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 95 start-page: 2585 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0325 article-title: Feed efficiency phenotypes in lambs involve changes in ruminal, colonic, and small-intestine-located microbiota publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 249 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0355 article-title: Feeding efficiency and behaviors of Simmental bulls selected for high growth capacity: comparison of bulls with high vs. low residual feed intake publication-title: Livestock Science doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104525 – volume: 84 start-page: 145 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0310 article-title: Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/2006.841145x – volume: 13 start-page: 289 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0410 article-title: Active dry yeast supplementation benefits ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, blood immunoglobulins, and growth performance in young dairy goats, but not for intermittent supplementation publication-title: Animal Nutrition doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.02.001 – volume: 100 start-page: 8881 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0085 article-title: Evaluation of a gas in vitro system for predicting methane production in vivo publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12675 – volume: 9 start-page: 1842 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0280 article-title: 16S RRNA sequencing reveals relationship between potent cellulolytic genera and feed efficiency in the rumen of bulls publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01842 – volume: 12 start-page: 1815 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0185 article-title: Invited review: improving feed efficiency of beef cattle – the current state of the art and future challenges publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1017/S1751731118000976 – volume: 152 start-page: 154 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0220 article-title: Intake of conserved and grazed grass and performance traits in beef suckler cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake publication-title: Livestock Science doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.12.024 – volume: 12 start-page: 1442 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0210 article-title: Associations of rumen parameters with feed efficiency and sampling routine in beef cattle publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1017/S1751731117002750 – volume: 99 start-page: 2339 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0095 article-title: Morphological adaptation of rumen papillae during the dry period and early lactation as affected by rate of increase of concentrate allowance publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9837 – volume: 96 start-page: 7603 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0265 article-title: Increased papillae growth and enhanced short-chain fatty acid absorption in the rumen of goats are associated with transient increases in cyclin D1 expression after ruminal butyrate infusion publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6700 – volume: 105 start-page: 4128 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0010 article-title: Effects of choline chloride on the ruminal microbiome at 2 dietary neutral detergent fiber concentrations in continuous culture publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21591 – volume: 207 start-page: 97 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0345 article-title: Effect of the supplementation with a blend containing short and medium chain fatty acid monoglycerides in milk replacer on rumen papillae development in weaning calves publication-title: Annals of Anatomy doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.04.035 – year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0090 – volume: 9 start-page: 2625 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0390 article-title: The impact of Pre-Slaughter fasting on the ruminal microbial population of commercial angus steers publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122625 – volume: 10 start-page: 1116 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0245 article-title: Dynamic alterations in yak rumen bacteria community and metabolome characteristics in response to feed type publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01116 – volume: 55 start-page: 85 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149_b0295 article-title: Butyric acid stimulates rumen mucosa development in the calf mainly by a reduction of apoptosis publication-title: Archiv Für Tierernährung doi: 10.1080/17450390109386185 |
SSID | ssj0059144 |
Score | 2.3776798 |
Snippet | •Residual feed intake is an attractive trait for the livestock sector.•Residual feed intake affects propionate production but not methane.•A small part of... Residual feed intake (RFI), a widespread index used to measure animal feed efficiency, is influenced by various individual biological factors related to... |
SourceID | doaj proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 101149 |
SubjectTerms | animals Beef cattle farms feed conversion Feed efficiency feed intake feeds fermentation Fermentative traits Histo-morphometry methane production propionic acid rumen fermentation Ruminal microbiota Simmental slaughter |
Title | Rumen fermentation parameters and papillae development in Simmental growing bulls with divergent residual feed intake |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101149 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38663151 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3047942189 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153557565 https://doaj.org/article/681f8fed98fe483ebe2d77d2f23a8708 |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT9wwELYqTvSAgFLY8pArcY26fiXOERAIIdFDAYmbZcc2Wto1iN39_52xky09wF64RErkxI5n4vkmnvmGkGMpvdas5hX3LlRSgYPiwOxV2o6ZttqPY4c7utc_68s7eXWv7l-V-sKYsEIPXCbuR61Z1DH4Fg5SC-iT-6bxPHJhQddymi_YvMGZKmuwalku4wq2kVWNYGxImsuRXTZNpha3HbjESwx5NF8Zpczd_59tegt7Zht0sUk2evBIT8qgt8inkLbJ55OHl55AI3whi1-w2CQaYcHts4oSRXrvKYa9zKhNHk6fsdRQoP5fwBCdJHozmRamf_oAvjmYNOrAP51R_FVLPcZvYBoWBf88J3BBH8HDfXP7O-yQu4vz27PLqi-tUHUAAOdV3XSSW5xTFnSQgGEcD0i9E5HPXoxb64WyIMUAeK1rXS2jsLbuwN5F2XklvpK19JTCHqFcCe5bCW6PC1K56GrFpW5dZL4NSvMREcPcmq7nHcfyF3_MEGD2aIpEDErEFImMSLW867nwbqxof4piW7ZF1ux8AXTJ9LpkVunSiDSD0E0PQAqwgEdNVnT_fdARA98nbrrYFJ4WMyMyhz8AqffagNlRgJtrNSK7RcGWLyI0YEKAZd8-4gX3yToOugRsHpC1-csiHAKomruj_P38BSLkHsw |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rumen+fermentation+parameters+and+papillae+development+in+Simmental+growing+bulls+with+divergent+residual+feed+intake&rft.jtitle=Animal+%28Cambridge%2C+England%29&rft.au=Romanzin%2C+A&rft.au=Braidot%2C+M&rft.au=Beraldo%2C+P&rft.au=Spanghero%2C+M&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.issn=1751-732X&rft.eissn=1751-732X&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=101149&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.animal.2024.101149&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1751-7311&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1751-7311&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1751-7311&client=summon |