Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for subphrenic hepatocellular carcinoma

• Published in: Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 543 - 552
• Main Authors: Kwak, Min Hwan, Lee, Min Woo, Ko, Seong Eun, Rhim, Hyunchul, Kang, Tae Wook, Song, Kyoung Doo, Kim, Jong Man, Choi, Gyu-Seong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 01.07.2022; 대한초음파의학회
• Subjects: Ablation; Clinical outcomes; diaphragm; Electrodes; hepatocellular carcinoma; Hospitals; Laparoscopy; Liver cancer; local tumor progression; Magnetic resonance imaging; Original; Patients; radiofrequency ablation; Tumors; 방사선과학; Local tumor progression; Radiofrequency ablation; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Laparoscopy; Diaphragm
• ISSN: 2288-5919; 2288-5943
• DOI: 10.14366/usg.21241

Purpose: Radiofrequency ablation is a curative treatment option for very early-stage or earlystage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) for subphrenic tumors is technically challenging. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) has been used to overcome this disadvantage. This study compared the treatment outcomes between LRFA and PRFA for subphrenic HCC.Methods: This retrospective study screened patients who underwent PRFA or LRFA for subphrenic HCC between 2013 and 2018. Therapeutic outcomes, including local tumor progression (LTP), intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR), extrahepatic metastasis (EM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between the two groups.Results: Thirty patients in the PRFA group and 23 patients in the LRFA group were included. LTP was observed in six patients in the PRFA group (20%), but in no patients in the LRFA group. The cumulative LTP rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 3.7%, 23.4%, and 23.4%, respectively, in the PRFA group and 0.0% in the LRFA group (P=0.015). The IDR, EM, and DFS rates were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.304, P=0.175, and P=0.075, respectively). The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96.6%, 85.7%, and 71.6%, respectively, in the PRFA group and 100%, 95.7%, and 95.7%, respectively, in the LRFA group (P=0.049).Conclusion: LRFA demonstrated better therapeutic outcomes than did PRFA for subphrenic tumors in terms of LTP and OS. Therefore, LRFA can be considered as the first-line treatment option for subphrenic HCC.