Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy
AIM To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with...
Saved in:
Published in | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 22; no. 34; pp. 7797 - 7805 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
14.09.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1007-9327 2219-2840 2219-2840 |
DOI | 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7797 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | AIM To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.RESULTS A total of 269(49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy,including 71(13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula,178(33.02%) cases of grade B,and 20(3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) and the following factors: age,hypertension,alcohol consumption,smoking,history of upper abdominal surgery,preoperative jaundice management,preoperative bilirubin,preoperative albumin,pancreatic duct drainage,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,intraoperative blood transfusion,Braun anastomosis,and pancreaticoduodenectomy(with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely,a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender(male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%,P = 0.008),diabetes(non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%,P = 0.047),body mass index(BMI)(≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%,P = 0.024),blood glucose level(≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%,P = 0.002),pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique(pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-tomucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%,P = 0.000),diameter of the pancreatic duct(≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%,P = 0.000),and pancreatic texture(soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%,P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender(male),BMI > 25,pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis,pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm,and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.CONCLUSION Gender(male),BMI > 25,pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis,pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm,and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. |
---|---|
AbstractList | AIM To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.RESULTS A total of 269(49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy,including 71(13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula,178(33.02%) cases of grade B,and 20(3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) and the following factors: age,hypertension,alcohol consumption,smoking,history of upper abdominal surgery,preoperative jaundice management,preoperative bilirubin,preoperative albumin,pancreatic duct drainage,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,intraoperative blood transfusion,Braun anastomosis,and pancreaticoduodenectomy(with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely,a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender(male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%,P = 0.008),diabetes(non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%,P = 0.047),body mass index(BMI)(≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%,P = 0.024),blood glucose level(≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%,P = 0.002),pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique(pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-tomucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%,P = 0.000),diameter of the pancreatic duct(≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%,P = 0.000),and pancreatic texture(soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%,P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender(male),BMI > 25,pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis,pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm,and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.CONCLUSION Gender(male),BMI > 25,pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis,pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm,and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.AIMTo analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.A total of 269 (49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy, including 71 (13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula, 178 (33.02%) cases of grade B, and 20 (3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and the following factors: age, hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, history of upper abdominal surgery, preoperative jaundice management, preoperative bilirubin, preoperative albumin, pancreatic duct drainage, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, intraoperative blood transfusion, Braun anastomosis, and pancreaticoduodenectomy (with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely, a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender (male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%, P = 0.008), diabetes (non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%, P = 0.047), body mass index (BMI) (≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%, P = 0.024), blood glucose level (≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%, P = 0.002), pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique (pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%, P = 0.000), diameter of the pancreatic duct (≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%, P = 0.000), and pancreatic texture (soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%, P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.RESULTSA total of 269 (49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy, including 71 (13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula, 178 (33.02%) cases of grade B, and 20 (3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and the following factors: age, hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, history of upper abdominal surgery, preoperative jaundice management, preoperative bilirubin, preoperative albumin, pancreatic duct drainage, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, intraoperative blood transfusion, Braun anastomosis, and pancreaticoduodenectomy (with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely, a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender (male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%, P = 0.008), diabetes (non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%, P = 0.047), body mass index (BMI) (≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%, P = 0.024), blood glucose level (≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%, P = 0.002), pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique (pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%, P = 0.000), diameter of the pancreatic duct (≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%, P = 0.000), and pancreatic texture (soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%, P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.CONCLUSIONGender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 269 (49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy, including 71 (13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula, 178 (33.02%) cases of grade B, and 20 (3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and the following factors: age, hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, history of upper abdominal surgery, preoperative jaundice management, preoperative bilirubin, preoperative albumin, pancreatic duct drainage, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, intraoperative blood transfusion, Braun anastomosis, and pancreaticoduodenectomy (with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely, a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender (male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%, P = 0.008), diabetes (non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%, P = 0.047), body mass index (BMI) (≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%, P = 0.024), blood glucose level (≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%, P = 0.002), pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique (pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%, P = 0.000), diameter of the pancreatic duct (≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%, P = 0.000), and pancreatic texture (soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%, P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. |
Author | Bing-Yang Hu Tao Wan Wen-Zhi Zhang Jia-Hong Dong |
AuthorAffiliation | Institute and Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Chinese PLA General Hospital;Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center,Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Bing-Yang surname: Hu fullname: Hu, Bing-Yang – sequence: 2 givenname: Tao surname: Wan fullname: Wan, Tao – sequence: 3 givenname: Wen-Zhi surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Wen-Zhi – sequence: 4 givenname: Jia-Hong surname: Dong fullname: Dong, Jia-Hong |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kclv3CAYxVGVqJmkvfdU-diLp-xLD5WiqJsUqVKUnBHGMCH1gAP2VPPfFyeTdDmUCwje7z30vVNwFFN0ALxBcE0Ele9_3m3WO4zXgdC1EEq8ACuMkWqxpPAIrBCEolUEixNwWsodhJgQhl-CEyy4kISTFYhXofxovLFTyqXxKTdjKlMaXTZT2LlmNNFmV8-28aFM82A-NOfRDPsSSpN8w4hqymytK2WRW1Pcw_1vLvVz6l10NWG7fwWOvRmKe33Yz8DN50_XF1_by-9fvl2cX7aWQT61vlNSGsEg89IrK1BvCO4R6TCFnVUWcyuFUx4jL7HnhEPWCYY6yVVPBffkDHx89B3nbut66-KUzaDHHLYm73UyQf_9EsOt3qSdZhBxImE1eHcwyOl-dmXS21CsGwYTXZqLRhJTRpnEskrf_pn1HPI05CrgjwKbUynZeW3DVEeTlugwaAT10qauberapq5t6qXNCsJ_wCfv_yDkgNymuLkPcfPMKCiXpRikkqr6ecTww4mTX-yYte4 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2018_02_057 crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S238599 crossref_primary_10_3390_life11111216 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_6186 crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v9_i12_270 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_023_01978_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_FS9_0000000000000127 crossref_primary_10_11569_wcjd_v28_i18_914 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04285_y crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_17673 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2024_05_526 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_020_00755_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2024_05_527 crossref_primary_10_1515_iss_2020_0021 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10585_020_10029_z crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000029757 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_019_2136_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2023_05_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2022_101897 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000009245 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2020_10_034 crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v15_i9_1901 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2022_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000022714 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_024_02671_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_020_02067_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_24873 crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_5691_25_10620_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_020_02036_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00595_019_01932_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_020_05462_w crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_16408 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04164_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2022_03_030 crossref_primary_10_11569_wcjd_v29_i23_1341 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000012151 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000003664 crossref_primary_10_4329_wjr_v15_i6_170 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2018_08_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06913_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_017_3660_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2024_04_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2018_07_047 crossref_primary_10_4251_wjgo_v12_i10_1133 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_023_02248_4 crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_1367238 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_019_01018_w crossref_primary_10_9738_INTSURG_D_20_00020_1 crossref_primary_10_14701_ahbps_22_098 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04274_1 crossref_primary_10_4174_astr_2022_102_3_139 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_023_02758_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2017_10_035 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_024_02559_0 crossref_primary_10_14423_SMJ_0000000000001800 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v25_i28_3722 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hbpd_2020_04_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2020_04_006 crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_27417 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10102181 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2018_01_008 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004855 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sipas_2021_100051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2024_10_009 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0043_1776340 crossref_primary_10_2147_RMHP_S305332 crossref_primary_10_2739_kurumemedj_MS7034001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_022_02128_w crossref_primary_10_12677_ACM_2024_142541 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hbpd_2019_06_008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_020_02552_w crossref_primary_10_4174_astr_2020_99_1_18 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12092547 crossref_primary_10_1159_000495406 crossref_primary_10_1177_1457496919840960 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2020_08_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2021_06_033 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_018_3725_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2020_01637 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2019_09_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2017_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_024_04026_9 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2020_0703 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers17030502 crossref_primary_10_4329_wjr_v14_i6_165 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_968897 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2019_06_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijso_2022_100509 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_26227 crossref_primary_10_1089_sur_2020_082 crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_14262 crossref_primary_10_7438_JSURG_2021_02_05 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2023_1043329 crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_70053 crossref_primary_10_1080_00015458_2019_1610258 crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605211001984 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04211_2 crossref_primary_10_4174_astr_2020_98_2_72 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_08255_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2024_07_003 crossref_primary_10_3892_mco_2019_1812 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_018_4718_3 crossref_primary_10_4097_kja_21096 crossref_primary_10_1177_0300060520943422 crossref_primary_10_1002_wjs_12173 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_080605 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_022_01500_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_019_01762_5 crossref_primary_10_3348_kjr_2018_0557 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0243515 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/bjs.5407 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821219af 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00239.x 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.151 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004 10.1111/hpb.12063 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.041 10.1002/bjs.9362 10.1002/bjs.9584 10.1007/s00268-015-3211-5 10.1007/s11605-013-2320-4 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2456 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00331-4 10.1007/s13304-011-0067-6 10.1007/s00268-013-2149-8 10.1186/s12893-015-0011-7 10.1016/j.surg.2009.12.005 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.03.002 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.012 10.1016/j.pan.2015.11.004 10.1155/2009/404520 10.1007/s11605-007-0270-4 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17491 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.011 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.010 10.1007/s00423-008-0324-4 10.1007/s00423-013-1061-x 10.5754/hge121172 10.4174/astr.2016.90.2.64 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.026 10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.035 10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00423-2 10.1007/s11605-013-2337-8 10.1002/14651858 10.1007/s00534-011-0373-x 10.1097/MD.0000000000001152 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000997 10.1186/1477-7819-11-131 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.014 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.018 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i11.335 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2016 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2016 |
DBID | 2RA 92L CQIGP ~WA AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7797 |
DatabaseName | 维普期刊资源整合服务平台 中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点 中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台 中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点 CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy |
EISSN | 2219-2840 |
EndPage | 7805 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5016380 27678363 10_3748_wjg_v22_i34_7797 90888889504849545152484956 |
Genre | Journal Article Observational Study |
GroupedDBID | --- 123 29R 2B. 2C~ 2RA 2WC 36B 53G 5VR 8WL 92F 92I 92L 93N 93R AAKDD ACGFO AENEX AFUIB ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CCEZO CHBEP CIEJG CQIGP CS3 CW9 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EMB F5P FA0 FRP GX1 HYE M~E OK1 P2P RNS RPM SV3 TCJ TGQ TR2 WFFXF XSB ~WA AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-fb988a7505f8f9c71da32d13b240bc9c26c87e9f21f82f63605b751b869d476f3 |
ISSN | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:30:40 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 03:05:53 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:03:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:11:28 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:21 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 14 10:15:14 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 34 |
Keywords | Pancreaticoduodenectomy Pancreatic fistula Complications Pancreatic duct Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis |
Language | English |
License | This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c506t-fb988a7505f8f9c71da32d13b240bc9c26c87e9f21f82f63605b751b869d476f3 |
Notes | Bing-Yang Hu;Tao Wan;Wen-Zhi Zhang;Jia-Hong Dong;Institute and Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Chinese PLA General Hospital;Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center,Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Correspondence to: Dr. Jia-Hong Dong, Institute and Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, 168 Litang Road, Beijing 102218, China. zhangwenzhi301301@163.com Author contributions: Hu BY and Dong JH contributed equally to this work; Hu BY and Dong JH designed the research; Hu BY collected and analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; Zhang WZ and Wan T contributed analytical tools; all authors have read and approved the final version to be published. Telephone: +86-10-66938331 Fax: +86-10-68241383 |
OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5016380 |
PMID | 27678363 |
PQID | 1824545828 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5016380 proquest_miscellaneous_1824545828 pubmed_primary_27678363 crossref_citationtrail_10_3748_wjg_v22_i34_7797 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i34_7797 chongqing_primary_90888889504849545152484956 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-09-14 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-09-14 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2016 text: 2016-09-14 day: 14 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG |
PublicationTitleAlternate | World Journal of Gastroenterology |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref39 ref16 ref38 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref42 ref41 ref22 ref44 ref21 ref43 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 |
References_xml | – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1002/bjs.5407 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821219af – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00239.x – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.151 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1111/hpb.12063 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.041 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1002/bjs.9362 – ident: ref41 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1002/bjs.9584 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3211-5 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2320-4 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2456 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00331-4 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1007/s13304-011-0067-6 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2149-8 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0011-7 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.12.005 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.03.002 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.012 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.11.004 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1155/2009/404520 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0270-4 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17491 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.011 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.010 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0324-4 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1061-x – ident: ref30 doi: 10.5754/hge121172 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.2.64 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.026 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.035 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00423-2 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2337-8 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1002/14651858 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0373-x – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001152 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000997 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-131 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.014 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.018 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i11.335 |
SSID | ssj0023352 |
Score | 2.5214276 |
Snippet | AIM To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of... To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of... To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.AIMTo analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref chongqing |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 7797 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Anastomosis, Surgical - methods anastomosis;Pancreatic Blood Loss, Surgical Body Mass Index Diabetes Complications duct;Complications Female fistula;Pancreaticojejunal Humans Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Observational Study Operative Time Pancreas - surgery Pancreatectomy - adverse effects Pancreatic Fistula - etiology Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects Pancreaticoduodenectomy;Pancreatic Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Period Preoperative Period Retrospective Studies Risk Factors |
Title | Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy |
URI | http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/84123X/201634/90888889504849545152484956.html https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678363 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1824545828 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5016380 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9NAEF6F8sILAnGFS0ZiH5Bxaq-9F29xDkWV4AGlauHF8rFugoodaAwS_4n_yIztxElpJUoURdYedrTfeK6dnSHkte8xkXHlOSbLcieITQp8MGeODlIQGNpLeIYHhd9_ELPj4OiUn_Z6v3eilqp1Mkh_XXmu5H9QhTbAFU_J3gDZ7U2hAa4BX_gFhOH3nzD-iHHhm4o5GC-4wjQZK9Nm84YXvdEJUzsHNKvzuHEDdmlIuK_ti6qumYgTUhBpdXs3s8yqElgT-va_7u0A00lAQ0W1oBNJNadqRCeKKh-_eMHo0K27JFWcTjgdjukQBguqx9gLLeEUeydTGo6oHtazQhp69RhBlcTpSlO1jbYNQc46n-LizJ5V9jwu7RPgTiemcD4vlnbt-raPlrEzw_pJ47KVya1LwxMYf9EcJW25MPpPQbFsJLGp2xiwVgdkqbtDlK0btGG9Umq5I8axVsNVIgLT7QCuP7-cDX4wNlj6waCbuZd4GyPA4KM5MDkwIwPQ_Fh9JW6R2wysErZxDrX2PR5fqzfX23_f7IrjAw8vPw4zeSxgHb7Buu1rRH-ZOZejdXfUn_k9cre1W6xhQ4T3Sc8UD0iBBGi1BGgBAVp7BGh1ZGS1BPjO2pCfVeYWkJ_VkZ9Vkx-2X0N-D8nxdDIfzZy2gIeTclesnTzRSsWgk_Jc5TqVXhb7LPP8BNTIJNUpE6mSRufMyxXLMXMdTyT3EiV0FkiR-4_IQVEW5gmx3ITzTAQmCFITYOVikTCV-7ERUrrSxH3ydrug0apJ1BJdj2CfHG7WPErbZPhYk-U8AqMYEYsAsQgQiwCxCBHrkzfbGZv7Xz_21QbGCLg1bsHFhSmriwis-aDZqu6Txw2s27sxKfBIld8ncg_w7QDMBL_fUywXdUZ47qJZ5T692SI8I3e6t-85OVh_r8wLULHXycuasP8ALNzB7Q |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk+factors+for+postoperative+pancreatic+fistula%3A+Analysis+of+539+successive+cases+of+pancreaticoduodenectomy&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E8%83%83%E8%82%A0%E7%97%85%E5%AD%A6%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88&rft.au=Bing-Yang+Hu+Tao+Wan+Wen-Zhi+Zhang+Jia-Hong+Dong&rft.date=2016-09-14&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft.issue=34&rft.spage=7797&rft.epage=7805&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748%2Fwjg.v22.i34.7797&rft.externalDocID=90888889504849545152484956 |
thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F84123X%2F84123X.jpg |