Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 22; no. 34; pp. 7797 - 7805
Main Authors Hu, Bing-Yang, Wan, Tao, Zhang, Wen-Zhi, Dong, Jia-Hong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 14.09.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1007-9327
2219-2840
2219-2840
DOI10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7797

Cover

Loading…
Abstract AIM To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.RESULTS A total of 269(49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy,including 71(13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula,178(33.02%) cases of grade B,and 20(3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) and the following factors: age,hypertension,alcohol consumption,smoking,history of upper abdominal surgery,preoperative jaundice management,preoperative bilirubin,preoperative albumin,pancreatic duct drainage,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,intraoperative blood transfusion,Braun anastomosis,and pancreaticoduodenectomy(with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely,a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender(male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%,P = 0.008),diabetes(non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%,P = 0.047),body mass index(BMI)(≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%,P = 0.024),blood glucose level(≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%,P = 0.002),pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique(pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-tomucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%,P = 0.000),diameter of the pancreatic duct(≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%,P = 0.000),and pancreatic texture(soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%,P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender(male),BMI > 25,pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis,pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm,and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.CONCLUSION Gender(male),BMI > 25,pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis,pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm,and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
AbstractList AIM To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.RESULTS A total of 269(49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy,including 71(13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula,178(33.02%) cases of grade B,and 20(3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) and the following factors: age,hypertension,alcohol consumption,smoking,history of upper abdominal surgery,preoperative jaundice management,preoperative bilirubin,preoperative albumin,pancreatic duct drainage,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,intraoperative blood transfusion,Braun anastomosis,and pancreaticoduodenectomy(with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely,a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender(male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%,P = 0.008),diabetes(non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%,P = 0.047),body mass index(BMI)(≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%,P = 0.024),blood glucose level(≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%,P = 0.002),pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique(pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-tomucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%,P = 0.000),diameter of the pancreatic duct(≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%,P = 0.000),and pancreatic texture(soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%,P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender(male),BMI > 25,pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis,pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm,and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.CONCLUSION Gender(male),BMI > 25,pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis,pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm,and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.AIMTo analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.A total of 269 (49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy, including 71 (13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula, 178 (33.02%) cases of grade B, and 20 (3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and the following factors: age, hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, history of upper abdominal surgery, preoperative jaundice management, preoperative bilirubin, preoperative albumin, pancreatic duct drainage, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, intraoperative blood transfusion, Braun anastomosis, and pancreaticoduodenectomy (with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely, a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender (male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%, P = 0.008), diabetes (non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%, P = 0.047), body mass index (BMI) (≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%, P = 0.024), blood glucose level (≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%, P = 0.002), pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique (pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%, P = 0.000), diameter of the pancreatic duct (≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%, P = 0.000), and pancreatic texture (soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%, P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.RESULTSA total of 269 (49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy, including 71 (13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula, 178 (33.02%) cases of grade B, and 20 (3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and the following factors: age, hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, history of upper abdominal surgery, preoperative jaundice management, preoperative bilirubin, preoperative albumin, pancreatic duct drainage, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, intraoperative blood transfusion, Braun anastomosis, and pancreaticoduodenectomy (with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely, a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender (male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%, P = 0.008), diabetes (non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%, P = 0.047), body mass index (BMI) (≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%, P = 0.024), blood glucose level (≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%, P = 0.002), pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique (pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%, P = 0.000), diameter of the pancreatic duct (≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%, P = 0.000), and pancreatic texture (soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%, P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.CONCLUSIONGender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at our hospital from March 2012 to October 2015. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 269 (49.9%) cases of pancreatic fistula occurred after pancreaticoduodenectomy, including 71 (13.17%) cases of grade A pancreatic fistula, 178 (33.02%) cases of grade B, and 20 (3.71%) cases of grade C. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and the following factors: age, hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, history of upper abdominal surgery, preoperative jaundice management, preoperative bilirubin, preoperative albumin, pancreatic duct drainage, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, intraoperative blood transfusion, Braun anastomosis, and pancreaticoduodenectomy (with or without pylorus preservation). Conversely, a significant correlation was observed between POPF and the following factors: gender (male vs female: 54.23% vs 42.35%, P = 0.008), diabetes (non-diabetic vs diabetic: 51.61% vs 39.19%, P = 0.047), body mass index (BMI) (≤ 25 vs > 25: 46.94% vs 57.82%, P = 0.024), blood glucose level (≤ 6.0 mmol/L vs > 6.0 mmol/L: 54.75% vs 41.14%, P = 0.002), pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique (pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis vs pancreatic-jejunum single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis: 57.54% vs 35.46%, P = 0.000), diameter of the pancreatic duct (≤ 3 mm vs > 3 mm: 57.81% vs 38.36%, P = 0.000), and pancreatic texture (soft vs hard: 56.72% vs 29.93%, P = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gender (male), BMI > 25, pancreatic duct-jejunum double-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm, and soft pancreas were risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Author Bing-Yang Hu Tao Wan Wen-Zhi Zhang Jia-Hong Dong
AuthorAffiliation Institute and Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Chinese PLA General Hospital;Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center,Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Bing-Yang
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Bing-Yang
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tao
  surname: Wan
  fullname: Wan, Tao
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Wen-Zhi
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Wen-Zhi
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jia-Hong
  surname: Dong
  fullname: Dong, Jia-Hong
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kclv3CAYxVGVqJmkvfdU-diLp-xLD5WiqJsUqVKUnBHGMCH1gAP2VPPfFyeTdDmUCwje7z30vVNwFFN0ALxBcE0Ele9_3m3WO4zXgdC1EEq8ACuMkWqxpPAIrBCEolUEixNwWsodhJgQhl-CEyy4kISTFYhXofxovLFTyqXxKTdjKlMaXTZT2LlmNNFmV8-28aFM82A-NOfRDPsSSpN8w4hqymytK2WRW1Pcw_1vLvVz6l10NWG7fwWOvRmKe33Yz8DN50_XF1_by-9fvl2cX7aWQT61vlNSGsEg89IrK1BvCO4R6TCFnVUWcyuFUx4jL7HnhEPWCYY6yVVPBffkDHx89B3nbut66-KUzaDHHLYm73UyQf_9EsOt3qSdZhBxImE1eHcwyOl-dmXS21CsGwYTXZqLRhJTRpnEskrf_pn1HPI05CrgjwKbUynZeW3DVEeTlugwaAT10qauberapq5t6qXNCsJ_wCfv_yDkgNymuLkPcfPMKCiXpRikkqr6ecTww4mTX-yYte4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2018_02_057
crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S238599
crossref_primary_10_3390_life11111216
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_6186
crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v9_i12_270
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_023_01978_9
crossref_primary_10_1097_FS9_0000000000000127
crossref_primary_10_11569_wcjd_v28_i18_914
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04285_y
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_17673
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2024_05_526
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_020_00755_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2024_05_527
crossref_primary_10_1515_iss_2020_0021
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10585_020_10029_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000029757
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_019_2136_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2023_05_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2022_101897
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000009245
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2020_10_034
crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v15_i9_1901
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2022_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000022714
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_024_02671_1
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_020_02067_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_24873
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_5691_25_10620_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_020_02036_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00595_019_01932_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_020_05462_w
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_16408
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04164_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2022_03_030
crossref_primary_10_11569_wcjd_v29_i23_1341
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000012151
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000003664
crossref_primary_10_4329_wjr_v15_i6_170
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2018_08_011
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06913_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_017_3660_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2024_04_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2018_07_047
crossref_primary_10_4251_wjgo_v12_i10_1133
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_023_02248_4
crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_1367238
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_019_01018_w
crossref_primary_10_9738_INTSURG_D_20_00020_1
crossref_primary_10_14701_ahbps_22_098
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04274_1
crossref_primary_10_4174_astr_2022_102_3_139
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_023_02758_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2017_10_035
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_024_02559_0
crossref_primary_10_14423_SMJ_0000000000001800
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v25_i28_3722
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hbpd_2020_04_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2020_04_006
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_27417
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10102181
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2018_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004855
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sipas_2021_100051
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2024_10_009
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0043_1776340
crossref_primary_10_2147_RMHP_S305332
crossref_primary_10_2739_kurumemedj_MS7034001
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_022_02128_w
crossref_primary_10_12677_ACM_2024_142541
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hbpd_2019_06_008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_020_02552_w
crossref_primary_10_4174_astr_2020_99_1_18
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12092547
crossref_primary_10_1159_000495406
crossref_primary_10_1177_1457496919840960
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2020_08_021
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2021_06_033
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_018_3725_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2020_01637
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2019_09_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2017_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_024_04026_9
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2020_0703
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers17030502
crossref_primary_10_4329_wjr_v14_i6_165
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_968897
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2019_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijso_2022_100509
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_26227
crossref_primary_10_1089_sur_2020_082
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_14262
crossref_primary_10_7438_JSURG_2021_02_05
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2023_1043329
crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_70053
crossref_primary_10_1080_00015458_2019_1610258
crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605211001984
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04211_2
crossref_primary_10_4174_astr_2020_98_2_72
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_08255_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2024_07_003
crossref_primary_10_3892_mco_2019_1812
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_018_4718_3
crossref_primary_10_4097_kja_21096
crossref_primary_10_1177_0300060520943422
crossref_primary_10_1002_wjs_12173
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_080605
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_022_01500_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_019_01762_5
crossref_primary_10_3348_kjr_2018_0557
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0243515
Cites_doi 10.1002/bjs.5407
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821219af
10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00239.x
10.1001/jamasurg.2014.151
10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004
10.1111/hpb.12063
10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.041
10.1002/bjs.9362
10.1002/bjs.9584
10.1007/s00268-015-3211-5
10.1007/s11605-013-2320-4
10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2456
10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00331-4
10.1007/s13304-011-0067-6
10.1007/s00268-013-2149-8
10.1186/s12893-015-0011-7
10.1016/j.surg.2009.12.005
10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001
10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.03.002
10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.012
10.1016/j.pan.2015.11.004
10.1155/2009/404520
10.1007/s11605-007-0270-4
10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17491
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.011
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.010
10.1007/s00423-008-0324-4
10.1007/s00423-013-1061-x
10.5754/hge121172
10.4174/astr.2016.90.2.64
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.026
10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.035
10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5
10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00423-2
10.1007/s11605-013-2337-8
10.1002/14651858
10.1007/s00534-011-0373-x
10.1097/MD.0000000000001152
10.1097/SLA.0000000000000997
10.1186/1477-7819-11-131
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.014
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.018
10.4240/wjgs.v7.i11.335
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2016
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2016
DBID 2RA
92L
CQIGP
~WA
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7797
DatabaseName 维普期刊资源整合服务平台
中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点
中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台
中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy
EISSN 2219-2840
EndPage 7805
ExternalDocumentID PMC5016380
27678363
10_3748_wjg_v22_i34_7797
90888889504849545152484956
Genre Journal Article
Observational Study
GroupedDBID ---
123
29R
2B.
2C~
2RA
2WC
36B
53G
5VR
8WL
92F
92I
92L
93N
93R
AAKDD
ACGFO
AENEX
AFUIB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CCEZO
CHBEP
CIEJG
CQIGP
CS3
CW9
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMB
F5P
FA0
FRP
GX1
HYE
M~E
OK1
P2P
RNS
RPM
SV3
TCJ
TGQ
TR2
WFFXF
XSB
~WA
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-fb988a7505f8f9c71da32d13b240bc9c26c87e9f21f82f63605b751b869d476f3
ISSN 1007-9327
2219-2840
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:30:40 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 03:05:53 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:03:21 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:11:28 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:21 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 14 10:15:14 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 34
Keywords Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Pancreatic fistula
Complications
Pancreatic duct
Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis
Language English
License This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c506t-fb988a7505f8f9c71da32d13b240bc9c26c87e9f21f82f63605b751b869d476f3
Notes Bing-Yang Hu;Tao Wan;Wen-Zhi Zhang;Jia-Hong Dong;Institute and Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Chinese PLA General Hospital;Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center,Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Correspondence to: Dr. Jia-Hong Dong, Institute and Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, 168 Litang Road, Beijing 102218, China. zhangwenzhi301301@163.com
Author contributions: Hu BY and Dong JH contributed equally to this work; Hu BY and Dong JH designed the research; Hu BY collected and analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; Zhang WZ and Wan T contributed analytical tools; all authors have read and approved the final version to be published.
Telephone: +86-10-66938331 Fax: +86-10-68241383
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5016380
PMID 27678363
PQID 1824545828
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5016380
proquest_miscellaneous_1824545828
pubmed_primary_27678363
crossref_citationtrail_10_3748_wjg_v22_i34_7797
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i34_7797
chongqing_primary_90888889504849545152484956
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-09-14
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-09-14
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-09-14
  day: 14
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle World journal of gastroenterology : WJG
PublicationTitleAlternate World Journal of Gastroenterology
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
References ref13
ref35
ref12
ref34
ref15
ref37
ref14
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref11
ref33
ref10
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref39
ref16
ref38
ref19
ref18
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref42
ref41
ref22
ref44
ref21
ref43
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
References_xml – ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.5407
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821219af
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00239.x
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.151
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1111/hpb.12063
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.041
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.9362
– ident: ref41
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.9584
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3211-5
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2320-4
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2456
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00331-4
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1007/s13304-011-0067-6
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2149-8
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0011-7
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.12.005
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.03.002
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.012
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.11.004
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1155/2009/404520
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0270-4
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17491
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.011
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.010
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0324-4
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1061-x
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.5754/hge121172
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.2.64
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.026
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.035
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00423-2
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2337-8
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1002/14651858
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0373-x
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001152
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000997
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-131
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.014
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.018
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i11.335
SSID ssj0023352
Score 2.5214276
Snippet AIM To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of...
To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 539 successive cases of...
To analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.AIMTo analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
chongqing
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 7797
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Anastomosis, Surgical - methods
anastomosis;Pancreatic
Blood Loss, Surgical
Body Mass Index
Diabetes Complications
duct;Complications
Female
fistula;Pancreaticojejunal
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Observational Study
Operative Time
Pancreas - surgery
Pancreatectomy - adverse effects
Pancreatic Fistula - etiology
Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects
Pancreaticoduodenectomy;Pancreatic
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Period
Preoperative Period
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Title Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy
URI http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/84123X/201634/90888889504849545152484956.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678363
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1824545828
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5016380
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9NAEF6F8sILAnGFS0ZiH5Bxaq-9F29xDkWV4AGlauHF8rFugoodaAwS_4n_yIztxElpJUoURdYedrTfeK6dnSHkte8xkXHlOSbLcieITQp8MGeODlIQGNpLeIYHhd9_ELPj4OiUn_Z6v3eilqp1Mkh_XXmu5H9QhTbAFU_J3gDZ7U2hAa4BX_gFhOH3nzD-iHHhm4o5GC-4wjQZK9Nm84YXvdEJUzsHNKvzuHEDdmlIuK_ti6qumYgTUhBpdXs3s8yqElgT-va_7u0A00lAQ0W1oBNJNadqRCeKKh-_eMHo0K27JFWcTjgdjukQBguqx9gLLeEUeydTGo6oHtazQhp69RhBlcTpSlO1jbYNQc46n-LizJ5V9jwu7RPgTiemcD4vlnbt-raPlrEzw_pJ47KVya1LwxMYf9EcJW25MPpPQbFsJLGp2xiwVgdkqbtDlK0btGG9Umq5I8axVsNVIgLT7QCuP7-cDX4wNlj6waCbuZd4GyPA4KM5MDkwIwPQ_Fh9JW6R2wysErZxDrX2PR5fqzfX23_f7IrjAw8vPw4zeSxgHb7Buu1rRH-ZOZejdXfUn_k9cre1W6xhQ4T3Sc8UD0iBBGi1BGgBAVp7BGh1ZGS1BPjO2pCfVeYWkJ_VkZ9Vkx-2X0N-D8nxdDIfzZy2gIeTclesnTzRSsWgk_Jc5TqVXhb7LPP8BNTIJNUpE6mSRufMyxXLMXMdTyT3EiV0FkiR-4_IQVEW5gmx3ITzTAQmCFITYOVikTCV-7ERUrrSxH3ydrug0apJ1BJdj2CfHG7WPErbZPhYk-U8AqMYEYsAsQgQiwCxCBHrkzfbGZv7Xz_21QbGCLg1bsHFhSmriwis-aDZqu6Txw2s27sxKfBIld8ncg_w7QDMBL_fUywXdUZ47qJZ5T692SI8I3e6t-85OVh_r8wLULHXycuasP8ALNzB7Q
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk+factors+for+postoperative+pancreatic+fistula%3A+Analysis+of+539+successive+cases+of+pancreaticoduodenectomy&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E8%83%83%E8%82%A0%E7%97%85%E5%AD%A6%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88&rft.au=Bing-Yang+Hu+Tao+Wan+Wen-Zhi+Zhang+Jia-Hong+Dong&rft.date=2016-09-14&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft.issue=34&rft.spage=7797&rft.epage=7805&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748%2Fwjg.v22.i34.7797&rft.externalDocID=90888889504849545152484956
thumbnail_s http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F84123X%2F84123X.jpg