Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for pain relief after caesarean section: a meta-analysis

•TAP blocks are effective in providing acute pain relief after caesarean section.•TAP blocks show their greatest analgesic effect in women not having intrathecal morphine.•Intrathecal morphine and TAP blocks treat pain at rest with similar effect. The effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of obstetric anesthesia Vol. 28; pp. 45 - 60
Main Authors Champaneria, R., Shah, L., Wilson, M.J., Daniels, J.P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0959-289X
1532-3374
1532-3374
DOI10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009

Cover

Loading…
Abstract •TAP blocks are effective in providing acute pain relief after caesarean section.•TAP blocks show their greatest analgesic effect in women not having intrathecal morphine.•Intrathecal morphine and TAP blocks treat pain at rest with similar effect. The effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for acute pain relief after caesarean section, in comparison to normal practice, remains uncertain. Electronic literature databases were searched from inception to May 2016 for randomised controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of TAP blocks following caesarean section. Trials were eligible if comparisons were made against no block or placebo, and/or intrathecal morphine. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Data for consistent outcomes were subject, where possible, to meta-analysis and presented as either mean differences with 95% confidence intervals or incidence of a particular event. Twenty published studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. TAP blocks significantly reduced pain at rest both when compared with placebo or no TAP blocks (−0.96, 95% CI −1.67 to −0.25, P=0.008) and intrathecal morphine (1.10, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.60, P<0.0001). Both these comparisons showed the greatest improvement with pain on movement, (−1.58, 95% CI −2.69 to −0.47, P=0.005 and 1.35, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.94, respectively, P<0.00001). Morphine consumption was significantly reduced with TAP blocks when compared to placebo or no TAP blocks (−15.88, 95% CI −22.02 to −9.73, P<0.00001). This significance was lost when TAP blocks were both compared to intrathecal morphine (0.89, 95% CI −0.64 to 2.43, P=0.25) and given in co-administration (0.00, 95% CI −0.10 to 0.10, P=1.00). TAP blocks provide effective analgesia after caesarean section; however, additional benefits are more difficult to demonstrate when long-acting intrathecal opioids are administered.
AbstractList Highlights • TAP blocks are effective in providing acute pain relief after caesarean section. • TAP blocks show their greatest analgesic effect in women not having intrathecal morphine. • Intrathecal morphine and TAP blocks treat pain at rest with similar effect.
•TAP blocks are effective in providing acute pain relief after caesarean section.•TAP blocks show their greatest analgesic effect in women not having intrathecal morphine.•Intrathecal morphine and TAP blocks treat pain at rest with similar effect. The effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for acute pain relief after caesarean section, in comparison to normal practice, remains uncertain. Electronic literature databases were searched from inception to May 2016 for randomised controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of TAP blocks following caesarean section. Trials were eligible if comparisons were made against no block or placebo, and/or intrathecal morphine. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Data for consistent outcomes were subject, where possible, to meta-analysis and presented as either mean differences with 95% confidence intervals or incidence of a particular event. Twenty published studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. TAP blocks significantly reduced pain at rest both when compared with placebo or no TAP blocks (−0.96, 95% CI −1.67 to −0.25, P=0.008) and intrathecal morphine (1.10, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.60, P<0.0001). Both these comparisons showed the greatest improvement with pain on movement, (−1.58, 95% CI −2.69 to −0.47, P=0.005 and 1.35, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.94, respectively, P<0.00001). Morphine consumption was significantly reduced with TAP blocks when compared to placebo or no TAP blocks (−15.88, 95% CI −22.02 to −9.73, P<0.00001). This significance was lost when TAP blocks were both compared to intrathecal morphine (0.89, 95% CI −0.64 to 2.43, P=0.25) and given in co-administration (0.00, 95% CI −0.10 to 0.10, P=1.00). TAP blocks provide effective analgesia after caesarean section; however, additional benefits are more difficult to demonstrate when long-acting intrathecal opioids are administered.
The effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for acute pain relief after caesarean section, in comparison to normal practice, remains uncertain.BACKGROUNDThe effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for acute pain relief after caesarean section, in comparison to normal practice, remains uncertain.Electronic literature databases were searched from inception to May 2016 for randomised controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of TAP blocks following caesarean section. Trials were eligible if comparisons were made against no block or placebo, and/or intrathecal morphine. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Data for consistent outcomes were subject, where possible, to meta-analysis and presented as either mean differences with 95% confidence intervals or incidence of a particular event.METHODSElectronic literature databases were searched from inception to May 2016 for randomised controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of TAP blocks following caesarean section. Trials were eligible if comparisons were made against no block or placebo, and/or intrathecal morphine. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Data for consistent outcomes were subject, where possible, to meta-analysis and presented as either mean differences with 95% confidence intervals or incidence of a particular event.Twenty published studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. TAP blocks significantly reduced pain at rest both when compared with placebo or no TAP blocks (-0.96, 95% CI -1.67 to -0.25, P=0.008) and intrathecal morphine (1.10, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.60, P<0.0001). Both these comparisons showed the greatest improvement with pain on movement, (-1.58, 95% CI -2.69 to -0.47, P=0.005 and 1.35, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.94, respectively, P<0.00001). Morphine consumption was significantly reduced with TAP blocks when compared to placebo or no TAP blocks (-15.88, 95% CI -22.02 to -9.73, P<0.00001). This significance was lost when TAP blocks were both compared to intrathecal morphine (0.89, 95% CI -0.64 to 2.43, P=0.25) and given in co-administration (0.00, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.10, P=1.00).RESULTSTwenty published studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. TAP blocks significantly reduced pain at rest both when compared with placebo or no TAP blocks (-0.96, 95% CI -1.67 to -0.25, P=0.008) and intrathecal morphine (1.10, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.60, P<0.0001). Both these comparisons showed the greatest improvement with pain on movement, (-1.58, 95% CI -2.69 to -0.47, P=0.005 and 1.35, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.94, respectively, P<0.00001). Morphine consumption was significantly reduced with TAP blocks when compared to placebo or no TAP blocks (-15.88, 95% CI -22.02 to -9.73, P<0.00001). This significance was lost when TAP blocks were both compared to intrathecal morphine (0.89, 95% CI -0.64 to 2.43, P=0.25) and given in co-administration (0.00, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.10, P=1.00).TAP blocks provide effective analgesia after caesarean section; however, additional benefits are more difficult to demonstrate when long-acting intrathecal opioids are administered.CONCLUSIONTAP blocks provide effective analgesia after caesarean section; however, additional benefits are more difficult to demonstrate when long-acting intrathecal opioids are administered.
The effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for acute pain relief after caesarean section, in comparison to normal practice, remains uncertain. Electronic literature databases were searched from inception to May 2016 for randomised controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of TAP blocks following caesarean section. Trials were eligible if comparisons were made against no block or placebo, and/or intrathecal morphine. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Data for consistent outcomes were subject, where possible, to meta-analysis and presented as either mean differences with 95% confidence intervals or incidence of a particular event. Twenty published studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. TAP blocks significantly reduced pain at rest both when compared with placebo or no TAP blocks (-0.96, 95% CI -1.67 to -0.25, P=0.008) and intrathecal morphine (1.10, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.60, P<0.0001). Both these comparisons showed the greatest improvement with pain on movement, (-1.58, 95% CI -2.69 to -0.47, P=0.005 and 1.35, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.94, respectively, P<0.00001). Morphine consumption was significantly reduced with TAP blocks when compared to placebo or no TAP blocks (-15.88, 95% CI -22.02 to -9.73, P<0.00001). This significance was lost when TAP blocks were both compared to intrathecal morphine (0.89, 95% CI -0.64 to 2.43, P=0.25) and given in co-administration (0.00, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.10, P=1.00). TAP blocks provide effective analgesia after caesarean section; however, additional benefits are more difficult to demonstrate when long-acting intrathecal opioids are administered.
Author Wilson, M.J.
Daniels, J.P.
Champaneria, R.
Shah, L.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: R.
  surname: Champaneria
  fullname: Champaneria, R.
  email: r.champaneria@bham.ac.uk
  organization: Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: L.
  surname: Shah
  fullname: Shah, L.
  organization: Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: M.J.
  surname: Wilson
  fullname: Wilson, M.J.
  organization: School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
– sequence: 4
  givenname: J.P.
  surname: Daniels
  fullname: Daniels, J.P.
  organization: Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27717634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkk9rGzEQxUVJaRy3X6CHomN6WFe7sv5sKIVgkrYQaKEp9CbG8izIWUuuZm0w_fJdYecSaHrSHN57Yn5vLthZTBEZe1uLWS1q_WE9C-sEs2acZ8LMhGhfsEmtZFNJaeZnbCJa1VaNbX-dswuitRgV0upX7LwxpjZazifsz6IPMXjoOXYd-iHsMSIRTx0fMkTaY6YdcViu0mYUEt_2EJFf3l9_f8-XffIPxLuU-RZC5Bn7gB2HbsDMPSBBRoicSm6KVxz4BgeoIEJ_oECv2csOesI3p3fKft7e3C--VHffPn9dXN9VXgk9VNZrY6xvzbIDr-dWSG2V1iBt14JWEnEplFGtrLWxc6W7WkvwAjwIUI2ycsouj7nbnH7vkAa3CeSxL5ukHbnaSiWNFaZI352ku-UGV26bwwbywT0CGwX2KPA5EWXsnA8DlPVGXKF3tXClG7d2pRtXunHCuEJ-ypon1sf0Z00fjyYcAe0DZkc-YPS4CnnE6lYpPG__9MTuT30_4AFpnXZ5LGNE4Khxwv0oF1MOZkQohJ6Xfa_-HfC_3_8CZMDQuQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000004517
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_27701
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e20878
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anclin_2021_08_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2017_04_007
crossref_primary_10_18231_j_ijca_2021_039
crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605221102092
crossref_primary_10_18231_j_ijca_2021_118
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2024_10_003
crossref_primary_10_36106_paripex_8100231
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18137034
crossref_primary_10_4097_kja_d_18_00269
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2023_101273
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00101_020_00809_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_16173
crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_15160
crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000002842
crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000002648
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2023_03_013
crossref_primary_10_1097_AJP_0000000000001014
crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_1948261
crossref_primary_10_31636_pmjua_v8i3_4_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2020_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aan_2020_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oxy_2020_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_020_01818_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2018_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2022_02_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_15233
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2016_12_001
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18073500
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2019_06_025
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0375_9393_21_15354_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2018_04_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jopan_2024_03_027
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_2156918
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000001422
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_accpm_2016_11_001
crossref_primary_10_1136_rapm_2020_101909
crossref_primary_10_1515_jpm_2022_0232
crossref_primary_10_4103_ija_ija_931_22
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_15699
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clp_2019_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1097_EJA_0000000000001013
crossref_primary_10_1097_EJA_0000000000001453
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2020_100281
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2024_111589
crossref_primary_10_1097_EJA_0000000000001379
crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000000590
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2019_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semperi_2019_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_020_02822_7
crossref_primary_10_1186_s42269_021_00588_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2018_04_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nwh_2023_03_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_AIA_0000000000000321
crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000003760
crossref_primary_10_1186_s44158_023_00106_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjane_2022_05_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_jog_14881
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40140_021_00436_7
crossref_primary_10_1136_rapm_2019_100752
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjao_2023_100242
crossref_primary_10_1177_0748806819868336
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2017_11_084
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aan_2018_07_007
crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_15339
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2017_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000041159
crossref_primary_10_2217_pmt_2018_0017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2024_104259
crossref_primary_10_3892_etm_2019_7540
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_13871
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2065_7660
Cites_doi 10.1177/0310057X0903700418
10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181933ec3
10.1093/bja/aen384
10.1007/s12630-012-9729-1
10.1007/s00540-012-1336-3
10.1001/jama.2009.1268
10.1016/j.redar.2012.09.024
10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b4c922
10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.03.003
10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02279-40.x
10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834f015f
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06184_2.x
10.4103/0019-5049.179451
10.1007/s12630-014-0162-5
10.1093/bja/aer061
10.5005/jp-journals-10027-1002
10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.05.004
10.1213/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3
10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005
10.1093/bja/aes279
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e30b9f
10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
10.1097/AAP.0b013e318259ce35
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05817.x
10.1093/bja/aep235
10.4103/1658-354X.154732
10.1213/ANE.0000000000000967
10.1213/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f
10.1097/ACO.0b013e328360fa16
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60831-5
10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.04.004
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1532-3374
EndPage 60
ExternalDocumentID 27717634
10_1016_j_ijoa_2016_07_009
S0959289X16300644
1_s2_0_S0959289X16300644
Genre Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CAG
COF
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HDV
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LX1
M29
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
O90
OAUVE
OL-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UV1
WUQ
Z5R
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-8c6778c97bfac6480368566a38f9a653eeb0575931678456f163ac0aca0a52583
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0959-289X
1532-3374
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 00:25:43 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:56:05 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:28:21 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:05 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:28:16 EST 2024
Tue Feb 25 19:55:42 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 17:37:05 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Caesarean section
TAP block
Transversus abdominis plane block
Language English
License Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c506t-8c6778c97bfac6480368566a38f9a653eeb0575931678456f163ac0aca0a52583
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://research.birmingham.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/clinical-effectiveness-of-transversus-abdominis-plane-tap-blocks-for-pain-relief-after-caesarean-section(82cdd81b-61ca-4b13-a48b-9c50c456fbeb).html
PMID 27717634
PQID 1835378078
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1835378078
pubmed_primary_27717634
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijoa_2016_07_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2016_07_009
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijoa_2016_07_009
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0959289X16300644
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijoa_2016_07_009
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
PublicationTitle International journal of obstetric anesthesia
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Obstet Anesth
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Ripolles, Marmana Mezquita, Abad, Calvo (b0195) 2015; 65
Gehling, Tryba (b0020) 2009; 64
Baaj, Alsatli, Majaj, Babay, Thallaj (b0070) 2010; 20
Kagwa, Hoeft, Firth, Ttendo, Modest (b0155) 2015; 385
Puddy E, Edwards B, Wrench I, Roberts F. Does the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block improve analgesia following subarachnoid anaesthesia with intrathecal diamorphine? A randomised double blinded control trial. Anaesthesia Conference: Annual Congress of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland Liverpool United Kingdom Conference Start: 20090923 Conference End: 20090925 Conference Publication: 65 (pp 95): January.
Mankikar, Sardesai, Ghodki (b0165) 2016; 60
Tan, Teoh, Woo, Ocampo, Shah, Sia (b0115) 2012; 29
Abdallah, Halpern, Margarido (b0175) 2012; 109
McMorrow, Ni Mhuircheartaigh, Ahmed (b0110) 2011; 106
Khan, Kunz, Kleijn, Antes (b0060) 2003
Eslamian, Jalili, Jamal, Marsoosi, Movafegh (b0090) 2012; 26
Bollag, Richebe, Siaulys, Ortner, Gofeld, Landau (b0080) 2012; 37
Mishriky, George, Habib (b0180) 2012; 59
Srivastava, Verma, Singh (b0145) 2015; 9
Canovas, Lopez, Castro, Rodriguez, Perez (b0085) 2013; 60
Baeriswyl, Kirkham, Kern, Albrecht (b0200) 2015; 121
Hospital Episode Statistics Analysis HSCIC. NHS Maternity Statistics - England, 2013-14. 2015. Available at
Daniels, Gray, Hills (b0170) 2009; 302
Liu, Ngeow, Yadeau (b0025) 2009; 34
NHS. Medicines Q&A. UK Medicines Information. UKMI. What are the equivalent doses of oral morphine to other oral opioids when used as analgesics in adult pallative care? 2009. Available at
Pan (b0005) 2006; 15
Fusco, Scimia, Paladini (b0190) 2015; 81
Belavy, Cowlishaw, Howes, Phillips (b0075) 2009; 103
McDonnell, O’Donnell, Curley, Heffernan, Power, Laffey (b0040) 2007; 104
Hoydonckx Y, Van de Velde M. The analgesic efficacy of the tap block compared with patient controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean section: A randomized double-blind trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med Conference: 29th Annual European Society of Regional Anaesthesia, ESRA Congress 2010 Porto Portugal Conference Start: 20100908 Conference End: 20100911. 2010;35:E45.
Singh, Dhir, Marmai, Rehou, Silva, Bradbury (b0140) 2013; 22
Lee, Palte, Chehade, Arheart, Ranasinghe, Penning (b0135) 2013; 25
Kanazi, Aouad, Abdallah (b0120) 2010; 111
Abrahams, Aziz, Fu, Horn (b0030) 2009; 102
Sharkey, Finnerty, McDonnell (b0185) 2013; 26
McKeen, George, Boyd, Allen, Pink (b0105) 2014; 61
Moher, Cook, Eastwood, Olkin, Rennie, Stroup (b0055) 1999; 354
Loane, Preston, Douglas, Massey, Papsdorf, Tyler (b0125) 2012; 21
McDonnell, Keating, Muchatuta, Pavy, Paech (b0015) 2009; 37
Sriramka, Sahoo, Panigrahi (b0150) 2012; 1
[accessed July 2016].
Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, Altman, PRISMA Group (b0050) 2009; 6
Costello, Moore, Wieczorek, Macarthur, Balki, Carvalho (b0130) 2009; 34
Rafi (b0035) 2001; 56
Charlton, Cyna, Middleton, Griffiths (b0045) 2010; 12
McDonnell, Curley, Carney (b0100) 2008; 106
Belavy (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0075) 2009; 103
Singh (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0140) 2013; 22
Lee (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0135) 2013; 25
Mishriky (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0180) 2012; 59
Moher (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0055) 1999; 354
Rafi (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0035) 2001; 56
Charlton (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0045) 2010; 12
Srivastava (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0145) 2015; 9
Gehling (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0020) 2009; 64
Abdallah (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0175) 2012; 109
10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0010
Sharkey (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0185) 2013; 26
McDonnell (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0015) 2009; 37
10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0095
Eslamian (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0090) 2012; 26
Baeriswyl (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0200) 2015; 121
Moher (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0050) 2009; 6
Mankikar (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0165) 2016; 60
Kanazi (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0120) 2010; 111
Costello (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0130) 2009; 34
Bollag (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0080) 2012; 37
McKeen (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0105) 2014; 61
Baaj (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0070) 2010; 20
Ripolles (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0195) 2015; 65
Loane (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0125) 2012; 21
Abrahams (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0030) 2009; 102
10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0065
Tan (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0115) 2012; 29
McDonnell (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0100) 2008; 106
10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0160
Daniels (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0170) 2009; 302
McDonnell (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0040) 2007; 104
Fusco (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0190) 2015; 81
Pan (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0005) 2006; 15
Sriramka (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0150) 2012; 1
McMorrow (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0110) 2011; 106
Canovas (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0085) 2013; 60
Liu (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0025) 2009; 34
Khan (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0060) 2003
Kagwa (10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0155) 2015; 385
References_xml – volume: 59
  start-page: 766
  year: 2012
  end-page: 778
  ident: b0180
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Can J Anesth
– volume: 34
  start-page: 47
  year: 2009
  end-page: 59
  ident: b0025
  article-title: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and analgesia: a qualitative systematic review
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
– volume: 65
  start-page: 255
  year: 2015
  end-page: 280
  ident: b0195
  article-title: Analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided blockade of the transversus abdominis plane – a systematic review
  publication-title: Rev Bras Anestesiol
– volume: 102
  start-page: 408
  year: 2009
  end-page: 417
  ident: b0030
  article-title: Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
– volume: 302
  start-page: 955
  year: 2009
  end-page: 961
  ident: b0170
  article-title: Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation for alleviating chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: JAMA
– reference: Hospital Episode Statistics Analysis HSCIC. NHS Maternity Statistics - England, 2013-14. 2015. Available at:
– volume: 37
  start-page: 539
  year: 2009
  end-page: 551
  ident: b0015
  article-title: Analgesia after caesarean delivery
  publication-title: Anaesth Intensive Care
– volume: 103
  start-page: 726
  year: 2009
  end-page: 730
  ident: b0075
  article-title: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
– volume: 81
  start-page: 195
  year: 2015
  end-page: 204
  ident: b0190
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery. A systematic review
  publication-title: Minerva Anestesiol
– volume: 121
  start-page: 1640
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1654
  ident: b0200
  article-title: The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in adult patients: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 12
  start-page: CD007705
  year: 2010
  ident: b0045
  article-title: Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 61
  start-page: 631
  year: 2014
  end-page: 640
  ident: b0105
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block does not improve early or late pain outcomes after Cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
– volume: 354
  start-page: 1896
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1900
  ident: b0055
  article-title: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 22
  start-page: 188
  year: 2013
  end-page: 193
  ident: b0140
  article-title: Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a double-blind, dose-comparison, placebo-controlled randomized trial
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
– volume: 106
  start-page: 186
  year: 2008
  end-page: 191
  ident: b0100
  article-title: The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 6
  start-page: e1000097
  year: 2009
  ident: b0050
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
  publication-title: PLoS Med
– volume: 21
  start-page: 112
  year: 2012
  end-page: 118
  ident: b0125
  article-title: A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
– volume: 60
  start-page: 253
  year: 2016
  end-page: 257
  ident: b0165
  article-title: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section
  publication-title: Indian J Anaesth
– reference: [accessed July 2016].
– volume: 1
  start-page: 5
  year: 2012
  end-page: 8
  ident: b0150
  article-title: Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block following Caesarean section
  publication-title: Int J Perioperative Ultrasound Appl Technol
– reference: Puddy E, Edwards B, Wrench I, Roberts F. Does the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block improve analgesia following subarachnoid anaesthesia with intrathecal diamorphine? A randomised double blinded control trial. Anaesthesia Conference: Annual Congress of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland Liverpool United Kingdom Conference Start: 20090923 Conference End: 20090925 Conference Publication: 65 (pp 95): January.
– volume: 385
  start-page: S36
  year: 2015
  ident: b0155
  article-title: Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane versus sham blocks after caesarean section in an Ugandan village hospital: a prospective, randomised, double-blinded, single-centre study
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1024
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1026
  ident: b0035
  article-title: Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
– volume: 26
  start-page: 334
  year: 2012
  end-page: 338
  ident: b0090
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anesthetic
  publication-title: J Anesth
– reference: NHS. Medicines Q&A. UK Medicines Information. UKMI. What are the equivalent doses of oral morphine to other oral opioids when used as analgesics in adult pallative care? 2009. Available at:
– volume: 29
  start-page: 88
  year: 2012
  end-page: 94
  ident: b0115
  article-title: A randomised trial of the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia
  publication-title: Eur J Anaesthesiol
– volume: 34
  start-page: 586
  year: 2009
  end-page: 589
  ident: b0130
  article-title: The transversus abdominis plane block, when used as part of a multimodal regimen inclusive of intrathecal morphine, does not improve analgesia after cesarean delivery
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
– volume: 64
  start-page: 643
  year: 2009
  end-page: 651
  ident: b0020
  article-title: Risks and side-effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
– volume: 25
  start-page: 475
  year: 2013
  end-page: 482
  ident: b0135
  article-title: Ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane blocks in conjunction with intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia
  publication-title: J Clin Anesth
– volume: 106
  start-page: 706
  year: 2011
  end-page: 712
  ident: b0110
  article-title: Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal morphine for pain relief after Caesarean section
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
– volume: 37
  start-page: 508
  year: 2012
  end-page: 514
  ident: b0080
  article-title: Effect of transversus abdominis plane block with and without clonidine on post-cesarean delivery wound hyperalgesia and pain
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
– volume: 20
  start-page: 821
  year: 2010
  end-page: 826
  ident: b0070
  article-title: Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postcesarean section delivery analgesia–a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study
  publication-title: Middle East J Anesthesiol
– volume: 60
  start-page: 124
  year: 2013
  end-page: 128
  ident: b0085
  article-title: Contribution to post-caesarean analgesia of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block
  publication-title: Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim
– volume: 9
  start-page: 298
  year: 2015
  end-page: 302
  ident: b0145
  article-title: Efficacy of trans abdominis plane block for post cesarean delivery analgesia: a double-blind, randomized trial
  publication-title: Saudi J Anaesth
– volume: 109
  start-page: 679
  year: 2012
  end-page: 687
  ident: b0175
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
– year: 2003
  ident: b0060
  article-title: Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. How to review and apply findings of healthcare research
– volume: 104
  start-page: 193
  year: 2007
  end-page: 197
  ident: b0040
  article-title: The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 26
  start-page: 268
  year: 2013
  end-page: 272
  ident: b0185
  article-title: Role of transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean delivery
  publication-title: Curr Opin Anaesthesiol
– volume: 15
  start-page: 185
  year: 2006
  end-page: 188
  ident: b0005
  article-title: Post cesarean delivery pain management: multimodal approach
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
– volume: 111
  start-page: 475
  year: 2010
  end-page: 481
  ident: b0120
  article-title: The analgesic efficacy of subarachnoid morphine in comparison with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– reference: Hoydonckx Y, Van de Velde M. The analgesic efficacy of the tap block compared with patient controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean section: A randomized double-blind trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med Conference: 29th Annual European Society of Regional Anaesthesia, ESRA Congress 2010 Porto Portugal Conference Start: 20100908 Conference End: 20100911. 2010;35:E45.
– volume: 37
  start-page: 539
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0015
  article-title: Analgesia after caesarean delivery
  publication-title: Anaesth Intensive Care
  doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700418
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0095
– volume: 34
  start-page: 47
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0025
  article-title: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and analgesia: a qualitative systematic review
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
  doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181933ec3
– year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0060
– volume: 102
  start-page: 408
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0030
  article-title: Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aen384
– volume: 59
  start-page: 766
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0180
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Can J Anesth
  doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9729-1
– volume: 20
  start-page: 821
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0070
  article-title: Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postcesarean section delivery analgesia–a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study
  publication-title: Middle East J Anesthesiol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 334
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0090
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anesthetic
  publication-title: J Anesth
  doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1336-3
– volume: 302
  start-page: 955
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0170
  article-title: Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation for alleviating chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1268
– volume: 60
  start-page: 124
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0085
  article-title: Contribution to post-caesarean analgesia of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block
  publication-title: Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim
  doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.09.024
– volume: 81
  start-page: 195
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0190
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery. A systematic review
  publication-title: Minerva Anestesiol
– volume: 6
  start-page: e1000097
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0050
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
  publication-title: PLoS Med
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
– volume: 34
  start-page: 586
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0130
  article-title: The transversus abdominis plane block, when used as part of a multimodal regimen inclusive of intrathecal morphine, does not improve analgesia after cesarean delivery
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
  doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b4c922
– volume: 22
  start-page: 188
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0140
  article-title: Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a double-blind, dose-comparison, placebo-controlled randomized trial
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.03.003
– volume: 65
  start-page: 255
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0195
  article-title: Analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided blockade of the transversus abdominis plane – a systematic review
  publication-title: Rev Bras Anestesiol
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1024
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0035
  article-title: Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02279-40.x
– volume: 29
  start-page: 88
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0115
  article-title: A randomised trial of the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia
  publication-title: Eur J Anaesthesiol
  doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834f015f
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0160
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06184_2.x
– volume: 60
  start-page: 253
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0165
  article-title: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section
  publication-title: Indian J Anaesth
  doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.179451
– volume: 61
  start-page: 631
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0105
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block does not improve early or late pain outcomes after Cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0162-5
– volume: 106
  start-page: 706
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0110
  article-title: Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal morphine for pain relief after Caesarean section
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aer061
– volume: 1
  start-page: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0150
  article-title: Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block following Caesarean section
  publication-title: Int J Perioperative Ultrasound Appl Technol
  doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10027-1002
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0065
– volume: 25
  start-page: 475
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0135
  article-title: Ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane blocks in conjunction with intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia
  publication-title: J Clin Anesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.05.004
– volume: 106
  start-page: 186
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0100
  article-title: The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0010
– volume: 21
  start-page: 112
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0125
  article-title: A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005
– volume: 109
  start-page: 679
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0175
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aes279
– volume: 12
  start-page: CD007705
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0045
  article-title: Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 111
  start-page: 475
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0120
  article-title: The analgesic efficacy of subarachnoid morphine in comparison with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e30b9f
– volume: 354
  start-page: 1896
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0055
  article-title: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
– volume: 37
  start-page: 508
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0080
  article-title: Effect of transversus abdominis plane block with and without clonidine on post-cesarean delivery wound hyperalgesia and pain
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
  doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318259ce35
– volume: 64
  start-page: 643
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0020
  article-title: Risks and side-effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05817.x
– volume: 103
  start-page: 726
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0075
  article-title: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aep235
– volume: 9
  start-page: 298
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0145
  article-title: Efficacy of trans abdominis plane block for post cesarean delivery analgesia: a double-blind, randomized trial
  publication-title: Saudi J Anaesth
  doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.154732
– volume: 121
  start-page: 1640
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0200
  article-title: The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in adult patients: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000967
– volume: 104
  start-page: 193
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0040
  article-title: The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f
– volume: 26
  start-page: 268
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0185
  article-title: Role of transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean delivery
  publication-title: Curr Opin Anaesthesiol
  doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328360fa16
– volume: 385
  start-page: S36
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0155
  article-title: Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane versus sham blocks after caesarean section in an Ugandan village hospital: a prospective, randomised, double-blinded, single-centre study
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60831-5
– volume: 15
  start-page: 185
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009_b0005
  article-title: Post cesarean delivery pain management: multimodal approach
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.04.004
SSID ssj0009386
Score 2.3953805
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet •TAP blocks are effective in providing acute pain relief after caesarean section.•TAP blocks show their greatest analgesic effect in women not having...
Highlights • TAP blocks are effective in providing acute pain relief after caesarean section. • TAP blocks show their greatest analgesic effect in women not...
The effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for acute pain relief after caesarean section, in comparison to normal practice, remains...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 45
SubjectTerms Abdominal Muscles - drug effects
Adult
Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
Caesarean section
Cesarean Section
Female
Humans
Nerve Block - methods
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Pregnancy
TAP block
Transversus abdominis plane block
Treatment Outcome
Title Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for pain relief after caesarean section: a meta-analysis
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0959289X16300644
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0959289X16300644
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27717634
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1835378078
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBYhhdJLaZM23T6CAj20FHdt62G7tyU0bFsSCk1gb2IkS7B52EvsPRX626uR5S2haQI92kjI1mPmk_TNN4S8dQBQOmYS0LJOuLZ5ArVxibWuBgFcQ0gGc3wi52f860IstsjhGAuDtMpo-webHqx1fDONvTldLZfTH3iC5bcLiwxVo7xbxwh2XiCt7-OvPzSPioVsj-G4C0vHwJmB47U8b1F7KBsEPJGUeLtz-hf4DE7o6Al5HNEjnQ0f-JRs2WaHPDyO9-O75GeU-bykA08jmjLaOtqjU0IOxrqjoOs2aIrQFXJd6bvT2ff3VHu_dtFRj2LpCpYNvbYenzoasohTA7YDDzAb2gXyVvOJAr2yPSQQZU2ekbOjz6eH8ySmV0iMSGWflAbF40xVaAdG8jJFLXopgZWuAimYtRrBXIWx8qXHWc53NJgUDKQgclGy52S7aRv7glBWZzLnWqQWESAXmme1Kf1eD6UoWS0nJBv7VZmoPY4pMC7VSDI7VzgWCsdCpXglXk3Ih02d1aC8cWdpNg6XGmNKvRVU3jHcWau4rZbt4kLuVKa6XKXqr8k2IWJT88Z8vbfFg3EuKb-Q8XbGj3O79i15LMwKlP-fkL1hkm3-Oy_8rlsy_vI_W31FHuHTQMN5Tbb767V948FUr_fDatknD2Zfvs1PfgOZVB4z
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swED-6FLa-jH222acGe9gYJrZlKc7eQllJ1yYMlkLexEmWIF1nh9p52j8_nS1njHUd7NX2IVsfdz9Zv_sdwFuHiLnjJkItiyjTNo2wMC6y1hUoMNPYFoOZL-TsIvu8Eqs9OO5zYYhWGXx_59Nbbx2ujEJvjjbr9egr_cHy24VVQqpRPqzfgX1Sp8oGsD89PZstfmnv8rbgY_vHiwxC7kxH81pfViQ_lHQansRLvDk-_Q1_tnHo5AHcDwCSTbt3fAh7tnwEd-fhiPwx_AhKn1eso2oEb8YqxxqKS0TD2NYMdVG1siJsQ3RX9m45_fKeaR_avtXMA1m2wXXJrq2HqI61hcSZQVujx5glq1v-VvmRIftuG4wwKJs8gYuTT8vjWRQqLERGxLKJckP6cWYy1g6NzPKY5OilRJ67CUrBrdWE5yaULp97qOV8X6OJ0WCMIhU5fwqDsirtETBeJDLNtIgtgcBM6CwpTO63e6RGyQs5hKTvV2WC_DhVwbhSPc_sUtFYKBoLFdOp-GQIH3Y2m05849aneT9cqk8r9Y5Q-dhwq9X4Jitbh7Vcq0TVqYrVH_NtCGJn-duU_WeLb_q5pPxapgMaP87V1rfk4TAfUwWAIRx2k2z33enYb7wlz579Z6uv4d5sOT9X56eLs-dwQHc6Vs4LGDTXW_vSY6tGvwpr5ydbzCDk
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+effectiveness+of+transversus+abdominis+plane+%28TAP%29+blocks+for+pain+relief+after+caesarean+section%3A+a+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+obstetric+anesthesia&rft.au=Champaneria%2C+R.&rft.au=Shah%2C+L.&rft.au=Wilson%2C+M.J.&rft.au=Daniels%2C+J.P.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0959-289X&rft.eissn=1532-3374&rft.volume=28&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=60&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijoa.2016.07.009&rft.externalDocID=S0959289X16300644
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F0959289X%2FS0959289X16X00064%2Fcov150h.gif