The treatment of textile wastewater including chromium(VI) and reactive dye by sulfate-reducing bacterial enrichment

Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) that could grow on modified Postgate C medium (PC) containing chromium(VI) were isolated from industrial wastewaters and their chromium(VI) reduction capacities were investigated as a function of changes in the initial pH values, chromium, sulfate, NaCl and reactive d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of environmental management Vol. 88; no. 1; pp. 76 - 82
Main Authors CRETIN, Demet, DÖNMEZ, Sedat, DÖNMEZ, Gönül
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2008
Elsevier
Academic Press Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) that could grow on modified Postgate C medium (PC) containing chromium(VI) were isolated from industrial wastewaters and their chromium(VI) reduction capacities were investigated as a function of changes in the initial pH values, chromium, sulfate, NaCl and reactive dye concentrations. The optimum pH value at 50 mg l −1 initial chromium(VI) concentration was determined to be 8. Chromium(VI) reduction by SRB was investigated at 22.7–98.4 mg l −1 initial chromium(VI) concentrations. At the end of the experiments, the mixed cultures of SRB were found to reduce within 2–6 days more than 99% of the initial chromium(VI) levels, which ranged from 22.7 to 74.9 mg l −1. The effects of the initial 0–9.0 g l −1 concentrations of disodium sulfate and 0–6% (w/v) concentrations of NaCI to chromium reduction showed that the lowest concentrations of sulfate and NaCI were the best for chromium reduction in the PC medium including 50 mg l −1 chromium(VI). Chromium(VI) reduction in 50 mg l −1 and 25–100 mg l −1 Remazol Blue, Reactive Black B or Reactive Red RB containing media were also investigated. In the experiments, 25–30% of the initial dye concentrations and 95% of the chromium(VI) was removed from the medium at the end of 72-h and 24-h incubation periods, respectively.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.019
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0301-4797
1095-8630
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.019