Comparison of translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma: A meta-analysis

•To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients.•Potential studies were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched.•A total of 9 publications, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical neurology and neurosurgery Vol. 196; p. 105994
Main Authors Jun, Wu, Gao, Yun-long, Yu, Hai-guang, Huang, Qing-liang, Long, Xin-quan, Liu, Guo-hua, Ting, Xu, Zhong, Xiu-ying, Zhou, Yu-fan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.09.2020
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract •To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients.•Potential studies were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched.•A total of 9 publications, involving 2429 patients, of these 2429 cases with vestibular schwannomas, 1628 were from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 from the retrosigmoid approach group.•The results found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; P = 0.026).•We found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; P = 0.02) and cranial nerves deficits (OR = 2.946; P = 0.001). To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients. Potential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data. A total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167−6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562−5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071−0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139). Based on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion.
AbstractList •To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients.•Potential studies were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched.•A total of 9 publications, involving 2429 patients, of these 2429 cases with vestibular schwannomas, 1628 were from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 from the retrosigmoid approach group.•The results found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; P = 0.026).•We found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; P = 0.02) and cranial nerves deficits (OR = 2.946; P = 0.001). To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients. Potential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data. A total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167−6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562−5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071−0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139). Based on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion.
Highlights•To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients. •Potential studies were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. •A total of 9 publications, involving 2429 patients, of these 2429 cases with vestibular schwannomas, 1628 were from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 from the retrosigmoid approach group. •The results found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; P = 0.026). •We found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; P = 0.02) and cranial nerves deficits (OR = 2.946; P = 0.001).
BackgroundTo date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients.Material and MethodPotential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data.ResultsA total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167−6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562−5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071−0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139).ConclusionBased on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion.
To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients. Potential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data. A total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167-6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562-5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071-0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139). Based on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion.
To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients.BACKGROUNDTo date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients.Potential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data.MATERIAL AND METHODPotential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data.A total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167-6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562-5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071-0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139).RESULTSA total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167-6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562-5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071-0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139).Based on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion.CONCLUSIONBased on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion.
ArticleNumber 105994
Author Gao, Yun-long
Zhong, Xiu-ying
Jun, Wu
Zhou, Yu-fan
Huang, Qing-liang
Yu, Hai-guang
Long, Xin-quan
Ting, Xu
Liu, Guo-hua
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Wu
  surname: Jun
  fullname: Jun, Wu
  email: 1353330962@qq.com
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yun-long
  surname: Gao
  fullname: Gao, Yun-long
  email: 276133850@qq.com
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hai-guang
  surname: Yu
  fullname: Yu, Hai-guang
  email: 1045434956@qq.com
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Qing-liang
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Qing-liang
  email: doctorhuangql@sina.cn
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Xin-quan
  surname: Long
  fullname: Long, Xin-quan
  email: 552413635@qq.com
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Guo-hua
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Guo-hua
  email: 30737892@qq.com
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Xu
  surname: Ting
  fullname: Ting, Xu
  email: 45527889@qq.com
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Xiu-ying
  surname: Zhong
  fullname: Zhong, Xiu-ying
  email: 463796942@qq.com
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Yu-fan
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Yu-fan
  email: fuzhoushiyiyuan@163.com
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32540713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkktvEzEUhS1URNPAX6gssWEzwa95IYSoIl5SJRbA2rrxXDcOM3awZ4ry7_GQtossKCtb1nePj865F-TMB4-EXHK24oxXr3cr0zuPUwwrwcT8WLatekIWvKlFUbVVc0YWTDJZNKqqz8lFSjvGmJRV84ycS1EqVnO5IMM6DHuILgVPg6VjBJ962Byi8-M2f0DBdzTiGENyN0NwHYX9PgYwW2pDzDzC6PwNvcU0us3UQ6TJbH-D92GAN_SKDjhCAR76Q3LpOXlqoU_44u5ckh8fP3xffy6uv376sr66LkzJqrGQrFO2Np1gHDqFJbQWhBVYNhuFtrVtXSsrOrCl5UqVG0QjBQpuK4nCcpBL8uqom63-mrI1PbhksO_BY5iSFoorxqq6Zhl9eYLuwhSz35lSvCzFHNSSXN5R02bATu-jGyAe9H2QGaiOgMlJpYj2AeFMz43pnb5vTM-N6WNjefDtyaBxY840-NyF6x8ff38cxxznrcOok3HoDXYuohl1F9zjEu9OJGbMGeh_4gHTQxxcJ6GZ_jZv1bxUYr7Iv-H8Q-B_HPwB4dPiZQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_MAO_0000000000004013
crossref_primary_10_3390_audiolres12060061
crossref_primary_10_4236_ojmn_2022_121002
crossref_primary_10_1097_MAO_0000000000003285
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bas_2024_102909
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2022_10_017
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0044_1790517
crossref_primary_10_1002_ohn_1031
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10143_023_01956_y
crossref_primary_10_4103_0028_3886_359243
Cites_doi 10.1097/00129492-200405000-00029
10.1177/019459988809900408
10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.016
10.1097/00129492-200203000-00020
10.1097/00129492-200301000-00021
10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.055
10.3171/2017.2.JNS162287
10.1097/00005537-200403000-00022
10.1177/000348940411300412
10.1007/s10143-013-0485-7
10.1007/s10143-019-01213-1
10.1016/j.anl.2010.01.004
10.1097/00129492-200209000-00023
10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0217
10.1001/archotol.129.4.429
10.1016/j.otc.2012.02.001
10.1093/ons/opx071
10.1097/01.mao.0000217356.73463.e7
10.1097/00005537-200404000-00016
10.1288/00005537-199401000-00009
10.1055/s-0038-1668541
10.7874/jao.2018.00164
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V.
Elsevier B.V.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
2020. Elsevier B.V.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 Elsevier B.V.
– notice: Elsevier B.V.
– notice: Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
– notice: 2020. Elsevier B.V.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
88G
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
K9.
M0S
M1P
M2M
M2O
MBDVC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
Psychology Database
Research Library
Research Library (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

ProQuest One Psychology

PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1872-6968
EndPage 105994
ExternalDocumentID 32540713
10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994
S0303846720303371
1_s2_0_S0303846720303371
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29B
3O-
4.4
457
4CK
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
71M
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8P~
9JM
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXLA
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABCQJ
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABUWG
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGWIK
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRLJ
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
AZQEC
BENPR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CS3
DU5
DWQXO
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EMOBN
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
FYUFA
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HDW
HMCUK
HMK
HMO
HMQ
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LX8
M1P
M29
M2M
M2O
M2V
M41
MO0
MOBAO
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OQ-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PG~
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
PUEGO
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SNS
SPCBC
SSH
SSN
SSZ
SV3
T5K
UKHRP
UNMZH
WUQ
Z5R
ZGI
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
ALIPV
RIG
3V.
AADPK
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AFKWA
AJBFU
AJOXV
AMFUW
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
NPM
7TK
7XB
8FK
K9.
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-30d4f7cd201ad4e5a9fa2f2e58b4ef9f9774f2daf5f1445beec32e21f63e2f1a3
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0303-8467
1872-6968
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 01:37:39 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 09:14:02 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:45 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:08:56 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:48:08 EST 2024
Wed Apr 02 07:27:19 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:32:18 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Translabyrinthine
ORs
NOS
RCTs
PRISMA
CIs
Retrosigmoid
WMD
Vestibular schwannoma
Odds Ratios
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Randomized controlled trials
Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
Weighted Mean Difference
confidence intervals
Language English
License Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c506t-30d4f7cd201ad4e5a9fa2f2e58b4ef9f9774f2daf5f1445beec32e21f63e2f1a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 32540713
PQID 2441552071
PQPubID 1226360
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2414006770
proquest_journals_2441552071
pubmed_primary_32540713
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0303846720303371
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
– name: Assen
PublicationTitle Clinical neurology and neurosurgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Neurol Neurosurg
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Brennan, Rowed, Nedzelski, Chen (bib0095) 2001; 94
Stangerup, Caye-Thomasen, Tos, Thomsen (bib0005) 2006; 27
Sanna, Russo, Taibah, Falcioni, Agarwal (bib0040) 2004; 113
Huang, Xu, Xu (bib0100) 2017; 99
Zou, Zhao, Chen (bib0055) 2014; 37
Visagan, Hall, Bradford, Khalil, Saeed (bib0010) 2019; 80
Sanna, Taibah, Russo, Falcioni, Agarwal (bib0075) 2004; 25
Mamikoglu, Esquivel, Wiet (bib0050) 2003; 129
Gange, Kirchner, Thompson (bib0085) 2018; 14
Rameh, Magnan (bib0090) 2010; 37
Maurer, Frommeld, Mann (bib0105) 2002; 23
Elhammady, Telischi, Morcos (bib0020) 2012; 45
Mamikoglu, Wiet, Esquivel (bib0045) 2002; 23
Becker, Jackler, Pitts (bib0080) 2003; 24
Akhigbe, Zolnourian, Bulters (bib0060) 2017; 39
Kim, Cho, Seol (bib0065) 2019
Mangham (bib0110) 1988; 99
Darrouzet, Martel, Enée, Bébéar, Guérin (bib0015) 2004; 114
Fishman, Marrinan, Golfinos, Cohen, Roland (bib0025) 2004; 114
Hoffman (bib0070) 1994; 104
Obaid, Nikolaidis, Alzahrani, Moumdjian, Saliba (bib0030) 2018; 22
Schwartz, Lekovic, Miller, Slattery, Wilkinson (bib0035) 2018; 129
Obaid (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0030) 2018; 22
Schwartz (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0035) 2018; 129
Mangham (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0110) 1988; 99
Visagan (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0010) 2019; 80
Elhammady (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0020) 2012; 45
Hoffman (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0070) 1994; 104
Brennan (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0095) 2001; 94
Sanna (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0040) 2004; 113
Huang (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0100) 2017; 99
Sanna (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0075) 2004; 25
Maurer (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0105) 2002; 23
Zou (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0055) 2014; 37
Kim (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0065) 2019
Akhigbe (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0060) 2017; 39
Becker (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0080) 2003; 24
Mamikoglu (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0050) 2003; 129
Darrouzet (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0015) 2004; 114
Stangerup (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0005) 2006; 27
Fishman (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0025) 2004; 114
Mamikoglu (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0045) 2002; 23
Gange (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0085) 2018; 14
Rameh (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0090) 2010; 37
References_xml – volume: 22
  start-page: 236
  year: 2018
  end-page: 243
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: Morbidity rate of the retrosigmoid versus translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection
  publication-title: J. Audiol. Otol.
– year: 2019
  ident: bib0065
  article-title: Comparison between retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches for large vestibular schwannoma: focus on cerebellar injury and morbidities
  publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev.
– volume: 37
  start-page: 15
  year: 2014
  end-page: 21
  ident: bib0055
  article-title: Functional outcome and postoperative complications after the microsurgical removal of large vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev.
– volume: 80
  start-page: 310
  year: 2019
  end-page: 315
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: Is there a difference in hospital stay between patients undergoing translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid surgery for vestibular schwannoma stratified by tumor size?
  publication-title: J. Neurol. Surg. B Skull Base
– volume: 45
  start-page: 375
  year: 2012
  end-page: 397
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results
  publication-title: Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am.
– volume: 114
  start-page: 501
  year: 2004
  end-page: 505
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Prevention and management of cerebrospinal fluid leak following vestibular schwannoma surgery
  publication-title: Laryngoscope
– volume: 24
  start-page: 107
  year: 2003
  end-page: 112
  ident: bib0080
  article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: a comparison of the translabyrinthine, middle fossa, and retrosigmoid approaches
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
– volume: 104
  start-page: 40
  year: 1994
  end-page: 58
  ident: bib0070
  article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak following acoustic neuroma removal
  publication-title: Laryngoscope
– volume: 14
  start-page: 58
  year: 2018
  end-page: 65
  ident: bib0085
  article-title: Ophthalmic complications following acoustic neuroma resection
  publication-title: Oper. Neurosurg. Hagerstown (Hagerstown)
– volume: 129
  start-page: 429
  year: 2003
  end-page: 431
  ident: bib0050
  article-title: Comparison of facial nerve function results after translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach in medium-sized tumors
  publication-title: Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
– volume: 94
  start-page: 217
  year: 2001
  end-page: 223
  ident: bib0095
  article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: influence of tumor size and surgical approach on incidence and response to treatment
  publication-title: J. Neurosurg.
– volume: 113
  start-page: 319
  year: 2004
  end-page: 328
  ident: bib0040
  article-title: Enlarged translabyrinthine approach for the management of large and giant acoustic neuromas: a report of 175 consecutive cases
  publication-title: Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.
– volume: 37
  start-page: 546
  year: 2010
  end-page: 552
  ident: bib0090
  article-title: Quality of life of patients following stages III-IV vestibular schwannoma surgery using the retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches
  publication-title: Auris Nasus Larynx
– volume: 23
  start-page: 749
  year: 2002
  end-page: 754
  ident: bib0105
  article-title: Vestibular function after acoustic neuroma removal with preservation of one branch of the vestibular nerve
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
– volume: 27
  start-page: 547
  year: 2006
  end-page: 552
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: The natural history of vestibular schwannoma
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
– volume: 23
  start-page: 224
  year: 2002
  end-page: 227
  ident: bib0045
  article-title: Translabyrinthine approach for the management of large and giant vestibular schwannomas
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
– volume: 129
  start-page: 128
  year: 2018
  end-page: 136
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: Translabyrinthine microsurgical resection of small vestibular schwannomas
  publication-title: J. Neurosurg.
– volume: 114
  start-page: 681
  year: 2004
  end-page: 688
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: Vestibular schwannoma surgery outcomes: our multidisciplinary experience in 400 cases over 17 years
  publication-title: Laryngoscope
– volume: 25
  start-page: 379
  year: 2004
  end-page: 386
  ident: bib0075
  article-title: Perioperative complications in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
– volume: 39
  start-page: 45
  year: 2017
  end-page: 48
  ident: bib0060
  article-title: Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: review of literature
  publication-title: J. Clin. Neurosci.
– volume: 99
  start-page: 326
  year: 2017
  end-page: 335
  ident: bib0100
  article-title: Complications and management of large intracranial vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach
  publication-title: World Neurosurg.
– volume: 99
  start-page: 396
  year: 1988
  end-page: 400
  ident: bib0110
  article-title: Complications of translabyrinthine vs. Suboccipital approach for acoustic tumor surgery
  publication-title: Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 379
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0075
  article-title: Perioperative complications in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
  doi: 10.1097/00129492-200405000-00029
– volume: 99
  start-page: 396
  issue: 4
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0110
  article-title: Complications of translabyrinthine vs. Suboccipital approach for acoustic tumor surgery
  publication-title: Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg.
  doi: 10.1177/019459988809900408
– volume: 39
  start-page: 45
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0060
  article-title: Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: review of literature
  publication-title: J. Clin. Neurosci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.016
– volume: 23
  start-page: 224
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0045
  article-title: Translabyrinthine approach for the management of large and giant vestibular schwannomas
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
  doi: 10.1097/00129492-200203000-00020
– volume: 24
  start-page: 107
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0080
  article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: a comparison of the translabyrinthine, middle fossa, and retrosigmoid approaches
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
  doi: 10.1097/00129492-200301000-00021
– volume: 99
  start-page: 326
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0100
  article-title: Complications and management of large intracranial vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach
  publication-title: World Neurosurg.
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.055
– volume: 129
  start-page: 128
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0035
  article-title: Translabyrinthine microsurgical resection of small vestibular schwannomas
  publication-title: J. Neurosurg.
  doi: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS162287
– volume: 114
  start-page: 501
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0025
  article-title: Prevention and management of cerebrospinal fluid leak following vestibular schwannoma surgery
  publication-title: Laryngoscope
  doi: 10.1097/00005537-200403000-00022
– volume: 113
  start-page: 319
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0040
  article-title: Enlarged translabyrinthine approach for the management of large and giant acoustic neuromas: a report of 175 consecutive cases
  publication-title: Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.
  doi: 10.1177/000348940411300412
– volume: 37
  start-page: 15
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0055
  article-title: Functional outcome and postoperative complications after the microsurgical removal of large vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev.
  doi: 10.1007/s10143-013-0485-7
– year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0065
  article-title: Comparison between retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches for large vestibular schwannoma: focus on cerebellar injury and morbidities
  publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev.
  doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01213-1
– volume: 37
  start-page: 546
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0090
  article-title: Quality of life of patients following stages III-IV vestibular schwannoma surgery using the retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches
  publication-title: Auris Nasus Larynx
  doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2010.01.004
– volume: 23
  start-page: 749
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0105
  article-title: Vestibular function after acoustic neuroma removal with preservation of one branch of the vestibular nerve
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
  doi: 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00023
– volume: 94
  start-page: 217
  issue: 2
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0095
  article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: influence of tumor size and surgical approach on incidence and response to treatment
  publication-title: J. Neurosurg.
  doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0217
– volume: 129
  start-page: 429
  issue: 4
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0050
  article-title: Comparison of facial nerve function results after translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach in medium-sized tumors
  publication-title: Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
  doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.4.429
– volume: 45
  start-page: 375
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0020
  article-title: Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results
  publication-title: Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am.
  doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.02.001
– volume: 14
  start-page: 58
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0085
  article-title: Ophthalmic complications following acoustic neuroma resection
  publication-title: Oper. Neurosurg. Hagerstown (Hagerstown)
  doi: 10.1093/ons/opx071
– volume: 27
  start-page: 547
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0005
  article-title: The natural history of vestibular schwannoma
  publication-title: Otol. Neurotol.
  doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000217356.73463.e7
– volume: 114
  start-page: 681
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0015
  article-title: Vestibular schwannoma surgery outcomes: our multidisciplinary experience in 400 cases over 17 years
  publication-title: Laryngoscope
  doi: 10.1097/00005537-200404000-00016
– volume: 104
  start-page: 40
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0070
  article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak following acoustic neuroma removal
  publication-title: Laryngoscope
  doi: 10.1288/00005537-199401000-00009
– volume: 80
  start-page: 310
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0010
  article-title: Is there a difference in hospital stay between patients undergoing translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid surgery for vestibular schwannoma stratified by tumor size?
  publication-title: J. Neurol. Surg. B Skull Base
  doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668541
– volume: 22
  start-page: 236
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0030
  article-title: Morbidity rate of the retrosigmoid versus translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection
  publication-title: J. Audiol. Otol.
  doi: 10.7874/jao.2018.00164
SSID ssj0003368
Score 2.3159497
Snippet •To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients.•Potential...
Highlights•To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients....
To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was...
BackgroundTo date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 105994
SubjectTerms Cerebrospinal fluid
Confidence intervals
Cranial nerves
Facial nerve
Headache
Headaches
Hearing loss
Meningitis
Meta-analysis
Neurology
Neurosurgery
Retrosigmoid
Schwann cells
Skull
Systematic review
Tinnitus
Translabyrinthine
Tumors
Vestibular schwannoma
Vestibular system
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2013
  dbid: .~1
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwELZWHFAvFY8-tjxkpF7DJnacTbihFSuEBJcWiZvl-AFBbIJ2gyou_HZmHCcUVahVueUxjqOZsWdGnvmGkO9FZvK8VEmkWaGiFIu4wDlSkYlRpXNTuAyrkc8vstPL9OxKXI3IrK-FwbTKsPd3e7rfrcOTSeDm5L6qJj9APTlaT4YX3NeRp-kUtfzw6SXNg3NfDoc0EVL_ViV8e4jVh4iBAXEi8y1viyJ9y0C95YB6QzTfIB-DB0mPu5_cJCNbb5H183BGvk0Ws6G1IG0cbdEYgagfl1Xd3gAFVbWhS9vC7NX1oqkM7XHFKTiw1Geegz2jHn-jxCxVChHwL1XXzUId0WO6sK2KVAAz-UQu5yc_Z6dRaKoQaRFnbcRjk7qpNmD4lUmtUIVTzDEr8jK1rnDoDzpmlBMOYi1RWqs5syxxGbfMJYp_Jmt1U9uvhJYum5oSfA6NsIbAPFGKnGmteaJAM9iYiJ6TUgfEcWx8cSf71LJb2UtAogRkJ4ExmQzj7jvMjb-OmPaCkn1FKeyBEszC_420q7CUVzKRKyZj-Ye6jUkxjHylsf80626vTXKYiGFoK1iMnz4YXsNqxyMcVdvmAWkgIEbQv3hMvnRaOLCIMw-myL-948d2yAe865Lodslau3ywe-B1teW-X1bPJuotBQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Elsevier
Title Comparison of translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma: A meta-analysis
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0303846720303371
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0303846720303371
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32540713
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2441552071
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2414006770
Volume 196
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB7RVkJcEG8CZWUkrmkTO84mXNBStVpAXSGg0t4sx4-yFZuU3VSIC7-dmcQJXAqIUyIljiPP2PONPfMNwIsyt0VR6TQ2vNRxRklcCI50bBNS6cKWPqds5NNFPj_L3i7lMmy4bUNY5bAmdgu1bQztkR9yAv6So0V8dfk1pqpRdLoaSmjswB5Rl1FI13Q5OlyJEF0qHOqxiMnO_pYhfHFAmYfEf4E-Iu_K3ZZldp1xug58dkbo5A7cDuiRzXpx34Ubrr4HN0_D-fh9WB-NZQVZ41lLhgjF_H2zqtvP-AbTtWUb12Lvq_N1s7Js4BRnCF5ZF3WOtox13BsVRagy9H6_6bpu1volm7G1a3WsA5HJAzg7Of50NI9DQYXYyCRvY5HYzE-NRaOvbeakLr3mnjtZVJnzpScs6LnVXnr0s2TlnBHc8dTnwnGfavEQduumdo-BVT6f2grxhiFKQxw8WcmCG2NEqlEreARyGEllAts4Fb34ooawsgs1SECRBFQvgQgOx3aXPd_GX1tMB0GpIZsU1z-FJuH_WrptmMZblaotV4n6SBpECsTpRkzTCMqxZUAqPQL5p173B21SY0e_tDuC5-NjnOl0fKNr11zRO-gME-FfEsGjXgvHIRK8I1IUT_788adwi_6kj5Hbh912c-WeIahqqwnsHPxIJ938mcDe7M27-QKvr48X7z_8BP97Jqs
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrQRcEG8CLRgJjqEbO84mSKgqpdWWdlcIWqk34_gBW7FJ2U1V9U_xG5nJCy4FhNRbpMRx5BnPfBPPfAPwIktsmuY6Cg3PdBhTEReCIx3aIal0ajOfUDXyZJqMj-L3x_J4BX50tTCUVtnZxNpQ29LQP_INTsBfcvSIm6ffQ-oaRaerXQuNRi323cU5hmzLN3vvUL4vOd_dOdweh21XgdDIYVKFYmhjPzIWPZ-2sZM685p77mSax85nngCR51Z76THYkLlzRnDHI58Ix32kBb73GqzGAkOZAay-3Zl--NjbfiHq4jvcOSIkz_5bTfLJK6p1JMYNjEp53WA3y-LL3OFlcLd2e7u34VaLV9lWo2B3YMUVd-H6pD2Rvwfz7b6RISs9q8j1oWJdLGZF9RWfYLqwbOEqnH32ZV7OLOtYzBnCZVbnuaP3ZDXbR045sQzj7XNdFOVcv2ZbbO4qHeqWOuU-HF3JYj-AQVEW7hGw3CcjmyPCMUSiiIsnc5lyY4yINOohD0B2K6lMy29ObTa-qS6R7UR1ElAkAdVIIICNftxpw_Dx1xGjTlCqq19Fi6vQCf3fSLdsDcdSRWrJ1VB9Ig0iBeJ0IUZRAFk_ssVGDeb5p1nXOm1S_US_9lMAz_vbaFvowEgXrjyjZzD8JorBYQAPGy3sl0jwmrpRPP7zy5_BjfHh5EAd7E33n8BN-qomQ28NBtXizK0jpKvyp-0-YvD5qrfuT8moYsQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3da9RAEB9qheKL-N1o1RX0MV6ym82HIFJaj9baImjh3tZNdleveEm9Syn91_zrnEmy0ZeqCH07uGz22PnNzG9u5wPgeZGaPC91HFa80GFCRVxIjnRoIoJ0bgqXUjXy4VG6d5y8m8nZGvzwtTCUVultYmeoTVPRf-QTTsRfcvSIEzekRXzYnb45_R7SBCm6afXjNHqIHNiLcwzfVq_3d1HWLzifvv20sxcOEwbCSkZpG4rIJC6rDHpBbRIrdeE0d9zKvEysKxyRI8eNdtJh4CFLayvBLY9dKix3sRb43mtwPRMyJh3LZmOwFwnRleGhDomQfPxv1cknL6nqkXpvYHzKu1G7RZFc5hgvI76dA5zegpsDc2XbPdRuw5qt78DG4XA3fxcWO-NIQ9Y41pITRIhdLOd1-xWfYLo2bGlb3H3-ZdHMDfP9zBkSZ9ZlvKMfZV3fj5KyYxlG3ue6rpuFfsW22cK2OtRDE5V7cHwlR30f1uumtpvASpdmpkSuU1E7RTw8WcqcV1UlYo2I5AFIf5KqGjqd08CNb8qntJ0oLwFFElC9BAKYjOtO-14ff12ReUEpX8mKtlehO_q_lXY1mJCVitWKq0h9JAQRgDh9EFkcQDGuHFhSz37-adctjyY1bvRLswJ4Nn6NVoaujnRtmzN6BgNxajYYBfCgR-F4RIJ3TRzFwz-__ClsoMKq9_tHB4_gBv2oPlVvC9bb5Zl9jNyuLZ90SsTg81Vr7U8hG2WU
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+translabyrinthine+and+retrosigmoid+approach+for+treating+vestibular+schwannoma%3A+A+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical+neurology+and+neurosurgery&rft.au=Jun&rft.au=Yun-long%2C+Gao&rft.au=Yu%2C+Hai-guang&rft.au=Qing-liang%2C+Huang&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Limited&rft.issn=0303-8467&rft.eissn=1872-6968&rft.volume=196&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.clineuro.2020.105994&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F03038467%2FS0303846720X00072%2Fcov150h.gif