Comparison of translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma: A meta-analysis
•To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients.•Potential studies were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched.•A total of 9 publications, i...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery Vol. 196; p. 105994 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2020
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | •To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients.•Potential studies were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched.•A total of 9 publications, involving 2429 patients, of these 2429 cases with vestibular schwannomas, 1628 were from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 from the retrosigmoid approach group.•The results found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; P = 0.026).•We found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; P = 0.02) and cranial nerves deficits (OR = 2.946; P = 0.001).
To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients.
Potential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data.
A total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167−6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562−5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071−0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139).
Based on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion. |
---|---|
AbstractList | •To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients.•Potential studies were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched.•A total of 9 publications, involving 2429 patients, of these 2429 cases with vestibular schwannomas, 1628 were from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 from the retrosigmoid approach group.•The results found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; P = 0.026).•We found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; P = 0.02) and cranial nerves deficits (OR = 2.946; P = 0.001).
To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients.
Potential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data.
A total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167−6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562−5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071−0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139).
Based on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion. Highlights•To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients. •Potential studies were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. •A total of 9 publications, involving 2429 patients, of these 2429 cases with vestibular schwannomas, 1628 were from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 from the retrosigmoid approach group. •The results found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; P = 0.026). •We found that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; P = 0.02) and cranial nerves deficits (OR = 2.946; P = 0.001). BackgroundTo date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients.Material and MethodPotential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data.ResultsA total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167−6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562−5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071−0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139).ConclusionBased on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion. To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients. Potential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data. A total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167-6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562-5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071-0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139). Based on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion. To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients.BACKGROUNDTo date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was limited. We aimed to evaluate postoperative complications between translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma patients.Potential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data.MATERIAL AND METHODPotential publications were selected from PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creation date of electronic engines to February 2020. STATA version 12.0 was exerted to process the pooled data.A total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167-6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562-5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071-0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139).RESULTSA total of 9 literature included in the study, involving 2429 patients, hails from the Germany, USA, Canada, Italy, and France. Of these 2429 patients with vestibular schwannoma, there were 1628 cases from the translabyrinthine approach group versus 801 cases from the retrosigmoid approach group. The results demonstrated that the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a lower rate of tinnitus (OR = 2.687; 95 %CI, 1.167-6.191; P = 0.02) and cranial nerve deficit (OR = 2.946; 95 %CI, 1.562-5.557; P = 0.001). And the translabyrinthine approach group was associated with a higher total resection rate (OR = 0.246; 95 %CI (0.071-0.848); P = 0.026). However, no statistic differences were found in the incidence of the near total (OR = 0.751; P = 0.351), subtotal resection (OR = 3.664; P = 0.109), postoperative facial nerve dysfunctions (OR, 0.763; P = 0.626), postoperative meningitis (OR = 2.7; P = 0.279), cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR = 1.225; P = 0.777), postoperative headache (OR = 1.412; P = 0.339), ophthalmic complications (OR = 0.87; P = 0.59), and vascular complications (OR = 2.501; P = 0.139).Based on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion.CONCLUSIONBased on current evidence, the translabyrinthine approach was associated with a higher rate of total resection and a lower rate of the tinnitus and cranial nerve deficit. But the risk of cranial nerve deficit was clearly affected by the preoperative status. And a translabyrintine approach could imply a complete sensorineural hearing loss, which contribute to the lower rate of postoperative tinnitus. Consequently, more evidence-based researches are needed to supplement this opinion. |
ArticleNumber | 105994 |
Author | Gao, Yun-long Zhong, Xiu-ying Jun, Wu Zhou, Yu-fan Huang, Qing-liang Yu, Hai-guang Long, Xin-quan Ting, Xu Liu, Guo-hua |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Wu surname: Jun fullname: Jun, Wu email: 1353330962@qq.com – sequence: 2 givenname: Yun-long surname: Gao fullname: Gao, Yun-long email: 276133850@qq.com – sequence: 3 givenname: Hai-guang surname: Yu fullname: Yu, Hai-guang email: 1045434956@qq.com – sequence: 4 givenname: Qing-liang surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Qing-liang email: doctorhuangql@sina.cn – sequence: 5 givenname: Xin-quan surname: Long fullname: Long, Xin-quan email: 552413635@qq.com – sequence: 6 givenname: Guo-hua surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Guo-hua email: 30737892@qq.com – sequence: 7 givenname: Xu surname: Ting fullname: Ting, Xu email: 45527889@qq.com – sequence: 8 givenname: Xiu-ying surname: Zhong fullname: Zhong, Xiu-ying email: 463796942@qq.com – sequence: 9 givenname: Yu-fan surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Yu-fan email: fuzhoushiyiyuan@163.com |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32540713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkktvEzEUhS1URNPAX6gssWEzwa95IYSoIl5SJRbA2rrxXDcOM3awZ4ry7_GQtossKCtb1nePj865F-TMB4-EXHK24oxXr3cr0zuPUwwrwcT8WLatekIWvKlFUbVVc0YWTDJZNKqqz8lFSjvGmJRV84ycS1EqVnO5IMM6DHuILgVPg6VjBJ962Byi8-M2f0DBdzTiGENyN0NwHYX9PgYwW2pDzDzC6PwNvcU0us3UQ6TJbH-D92GAN_SKDjhCAR76Q3LpOXlqoU_44u5ckh8fP3xffy6uv376sr66LkzJqrGQrFO2Np1gHDqFJbQWhBVYNhuFtrVtXSsrOrCl5UqVG0QjBQpuK4nCcpBL8uqom63-mrI1PbhksO_BY5iSFoorxqq6Zhl9eYLuwhSz35lSvCzFHNSSXN5R02bATu-jGyAe9H2QGaiOgMlJpYj2AeFMz43pnb5vTM-N6WNjefDtyaBxY840-NyF6x8ff38cxxznrcOok3HoDXYuohl1F9zjEu9OJGbMGeh_4gHTQxxcJ6GZ_jZv1bxUYr7Iv-H8Q-B_HPwB4dPiZQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_MAO_0000000000004013 crossref_primary_10_3390_audiolres12060061 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojmn_2022_121002 crossref_primary_10_1097_MAO_0000000000003285 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bas_2024_102909 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2022_10_017 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0044_1790517 crossref_primary_10_1002_ohn_1031 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10143_023_01956_y crossref_primary_10_4103_0028_3886_359243 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/00129492-200405000-00029 10.1177/019459988809900408 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.016 10.1097/00129492-200203000-00020 10.1097/00129492-200301000-00021 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.055 10.3171/2017.2.JNS162287 10.1097/00005537-200403000-00022 10.1177/000348940411300412 10.1007/s10143-013-0485-7 10.1007/s10143-019-01213-1 10.1016/j.anl.2010.01.004 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00023 10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0217 10.1001/archotol.129.4.429 10.1016/j.otc.2012.02.001 10.1093/ons/opx071 10.1097/01.mao.0000217356.73463.e7 10.1097/00005537-200404000-00016 10.1288/00005537-199401000-00009 10.1055/s-0038-1668541 10.7874/jao.2018.00164 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 Elsevier B.V. Elsevier B.V. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2020. Elsevier B.V. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 Elsevier B.V. – notice: Elsevier B.V. – notice: Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. – notice: 2020. Elsevier B.V. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7TK 7X7 7XB 88E 88G 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH K9. M0S M1P M2M M2O MBDVC PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PSYQQ Q9U 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Neurosciences Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student Research Library Prep ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database Psychology Database Research Library Research Library (Corporate) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest One Psychology Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest One Psychology PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1872-6968 |
EndPage | 105994 |
ExternalDocumentID | 32540713 10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994 S0303846720303371 1_s2_0_S0303846720303371 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29B 3O- 4.4 457 4CK 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8P~ 9JM AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AATTM AAXKI AAXLA AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABCQJ ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABUWG ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACIUM ACPRK ACRLP ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFKRA AFPUW AFRAH AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGUBO AGWIK AGYEJ AHHHB AHMBA AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRLJ AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN AZQEC BENPR BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CS3 DU5 DWQXO EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EMOBN EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN FYUFA G-2 G-Q GBLVA GNUQQ GUQSH HDW HMCUK HMK HMO HMQ HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LX8 M1P M29 M2M M2O M2V M41 MO0 MOBAO N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OQ- OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PG~ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ PUEGO Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SNS SPCBC SSH SSN SSZ SV3 T5K UKHRP UNMZH WUQ Z5R ZGI ~G- AACTN AFCTW ALIPV RIG 3V. AADPK AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AFKWA AJBFU AJOXV AMFUW EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION NPM 7TK 7XB 8FK K9. MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-30d4f7cd201ad4e5a9fa2f2e58b4ef9f9774f2daf5f1445beec32e21f63e2f1a3 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0303-8467 1872-6968 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 01:37:39 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 09:14:02 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:02:45 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:08:56 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:48:08 EST 2024 Wed Apr 02 07:27:19 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:32:18 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Translabyrinthine ORs NOS RCTs PRISMA CIs Retrosigmoid WMD Vestibular schwannoma Odds Ratios Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Randomized controlled trials Newcastle-Ottawa Scale Weighted Mean Difference confidence intervals |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c506t-30d4f7cd201ad4e5a9fa2f2e58b4ef9f9774f2daf5f1445beec32e21f63e2f1a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 32540713 |
PQID | 2441552071 |
PQPubID | 1226360 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2414006770 proquest_journals_2441552071 pubmed_primary_32540713 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0303846720303371 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2020_105994 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2020 text: 2020-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands – name: Assen |
PublicationTitle | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Neurol Neurosurg |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V Elsevier Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V – name: Elsevier Limited |
References | Brennan, Rowed, Nedzelski, Chen (bib0095) 2001; 94 Stangerup, Caye-Thomasen, Tos, Thomsen (bib0005) 2006; 27 Sanna, Russo, Taibah, Falcioni, Agarwal (bib0040) 2004; 113 Huang, Xu, Xu (bib0100) 2017; 99 Zou, Zhao, Chen (bib0055) 2014; 37 Visagan, Hall, Bradford, Khalil, Saeed (bib0010) 2019; 80 Sanna, Taibah, Russo, Falcioni, Agarwal (bib0075) 2004; 25 Mamikoglu, Esquivel, Wiet (bib0050) 2003; 129 Gange, Kirchner, Thompson (bib0085) 2018; 14 Rameh, Magnan (bib0090) 2010; 37 Maurer, Frommeld, Mann (bib0105) 2002; 23 Elhammady, Telischi, Morcos (bib0020) 2012; 45 Mamikoglu, Wiet, Esquivel (bib0045) 2002; 23 Becker, Jackler, Pitts (bib0080) 2003; 24 Akhigbe, Zolnourian, Bulters (bib0060) 2017; 39 Kim, Cho, Seol (bib0065) 2019 Mangham (bib0110) 1988; 99 Darrouzet, Martel, Enée, Bébéar, Guérin (bib0015) 2004; 114 Fishman, Marrinan, Golfinos, Cohen, Roland (bib0025) 2004; 114 Hoffman (bib0070) 1994; 104 Obaid, Nikolaidis, Alzahrani, Moumdjian, Saliba (bib0030) 2018; 22 Schwartz, Lekovic, Miller, Slattery, Wilkinson (bib0035) 2018; 129 Obaid (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0030) 2018; 22 Schwartz (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0035) 2018; 129 Mangham (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0110) 1988; 99 Visagan (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0010) 2019; 80 Elhammady (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0020) 2012; 45 Hoffman (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0070) 1994; 104 Brennan (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0095) 2001; 94 Sanna (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0040) 2004; 113 Huang (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0100) 2017; 99 Sanna (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0075) 2004; 25 Maurer (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0105) 2002; 23 Zou (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0055) 2014; 37 Kim (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0065) 2019 Akhigbe (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0060) 2017; 39 Becker (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0080) 2003; 24 Mamikoglu (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0050) 2003; 129 Darrouzet (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0015) 2004; 114 Stangerup (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0005) 2006; 27 Fishman (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0025) 2004; 114 Mamikoglu (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0045) 2002; 23 Gange (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0085) 2018; 14 Rameh (10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0090) 2010; 37 |
References_xml | – volume: 22 start-page: 236 year: 2018 end-page: 243 ident: bib0030 article-title: Morbidity rate of the retrosigmoid versus translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection publication-title: J. Audiol. Otol. – year: 2019 ident: bib0065 article-title: Comparison between retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches for large vestibular schwannoma: focus on cerebellar injury and morbidities publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev. – volume: 37 start-page: 15 year: 2014 end-page: 21 ident: bib0055 article-title: Functional outcome and postoperative complications after the microsurgical removal of large vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a meta-analysis publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev. – volume: 80 start-page: 310 year: 2019 end-page: 315 ident: bib0010 article-title: Is there a difference in hospital stay between patients undergoing translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid surgery for vestibular schwannoma stratified by tumor size? publication-title: J. Neurol. Surg. B Skull Base – volume: 45 start-page: 375 year: 2012 end-page: 397 ident: bib0020 article-title: Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results publication-title: Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. – volume: 114 start-page: 501 year: 2004 end-page: 505 ident: bib0025 article-title: Prevention and management of cerebrospinal fluid leak following vestibular schwannoma surgery publication-title: Laryngoscope – volume: 24 start-page: 107 year: 2003 end-page: 112 ident: bib0080 article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: a comparison of the translabyrinthine, middle fossa, and retrosigmoid approaches publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. – volume: 104 start-page: 40 year: 1994 end-page: 58 ident: bib0070 article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak following acoustic neuroma removal publication-title: Laryngoscope – volume: 14 start-page: 58 year: 2018 end-page: 65 ident: bib0085 article-title: Ophthalmic complications following acoustic neuroma resection publication-title: Oper. Neurosurg. Hagerstown (Hagerstown) – volume: 129 start-page: 429 year: 2003 end-page: 431 ident: bib0050 article-title: Comparison of facial nerve function results after translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach in medium-sized tumors publication-title: Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. – volume: 94 start-page: 217 year: 2001 end-page: 223 ident: bib0095 article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: influence of tumor size and surgical approach on incidence and response to treatment publication-title: J. Neurosurg. – volume: 113 start-page: 319 year: 2004 end-page: 328 ident: bib0040 article-title: Enlarged translabyrinthine approach for the management of large and giant acoustic neuromas: a report of 175 consecutive cases publication-title: Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. – volume: 37 start-page: 546 year: 2010 end-page: 552 ident: bib0090 article-title: Quality of life of patients following stages III-IV vestibular schwannoma surgery using the retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches publication-title: Auris Nasus Larynx – volume: 23 start-page: 749 year: 2002 end-page: 754 ident: bib0105 article-title: Vestibular function after acoustic neuroma removal with preservation of one branch of the vestibular nerve publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. – volume: 27 start-page: 547 year: 2006 end-page: 552 ident: bib0005 article-title: The natural history of vestibular schwannoma publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. – volume: 23 start-page: 224 year: 2002 end-page: 227 ident: bib0045 article-title: Translabyrinthine approach for the management of large and giant vestibular schwannomas publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. – volume: 129 start-page: 128 year: 2018 end-page: 136 ident: bib0035 article-title: Translabyrinthine microsurgical resection of small vestibular schwannomas publication-title: J. Neurosurg. – volume: 114 start-page: 681 year: 2004 end-page: 688 ident: bib0015 article-title: Vestibular schwannoma surgery outcomes: our multidisciplinary experience in 400 cases over 17 years publication-title: Laryngoscope – volume: 25 start-page: 379 year: 2004 end-page: 386 ident: bib0075 article-title: Perioperative complications in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. – volume: 39 start-page: 45 year: 2017 end-page: 48 ident: bib0060 article-title: Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: review of literature publication-title: J. Clin. Neurosci. – volume: 99 start-page: 326 year: 2017 end-page: 335 ident: bib0100 article-title: Complications and management of large intracranial vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach publication-title: World Neurosurg. – volume: 99 start-page: 396 year: 1988 end-page: 400 ident: bib0110 article-title: Complications of translabyrinthine vs. Suboccipital approach for acoustic tumor surgery publication-title: Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. – volume: 25 start-page: 379 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0075 article-title: Perioperative complications in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200405000-00029 – volume: 99 start-page: 396 issue: 4 year: 1988 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0110 article-title: Complications of translabyrinthine vs. Suboccipital approach for acoustic tumor surgery publication-title: Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. doi: 10.1177/019459988809900408 – volume: 39 start-page: 45 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0060 article-title: Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: review of literature publication-title: J. Clin. Neurosci. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.016 – volume: 23 start-page: 224 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0045 article-title: Translabyrinthine approach for the management of large and giant vestibular schwannomas publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200203000-00020 – volume: 24 start-page: 107 issue: 1 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0080 article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: a comparison of the translabyrinthine, middle fossa, and retrosigmoid approaches publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200301000-00021 – volume: 99 start-page: 326 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0100 article-title: Complications and management of large intracranial vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach publication-title: World Neurosurg. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.055 – volume: 129 start-page: 128 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0035 article-title: Translabyrinthine microsurgical resection of small vestibular schwannomas publication-title: J. Neurosurg. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS162287 – volume: 114 start-page: 501 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0025 article-title: Prevention and management of cerebrospinal fluid leak following vestibular schwannoma surgery publication-title: Laryngoscope doi: 10.1097/00005537-200403000-00022 – volume: 113 start-page: 319 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0040 article-title: Enlarged translabyrinthine approach for the management of large and giant acoustic neuromas: a report of 175 consecutive cases publication-title: Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. doi: 10.1177/000348940411300412 – volume: 37 start-page: 15 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0055 article-title: Functional outcome and postoperative complications after the microsurgical removal of large vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a meta-analysis publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev. doi: 10.1007/s10143-013-0485-7 – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0065 article-title: Comparison between retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches for large vestibular schwannoma: focus on cerebellar injury and morbidities publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01213-1 – volume: 37 start-page: 546 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0090 article-title: Quality of life of patients following stages III-IV vestibular schwannoma surgery using the retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches publication-title: Auris Nasus Larynx doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2010.01.004 – volume: 23 start-page: 749 issue: 5 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0105 article-title: Vestibular function after acoustic neuroma removal with preservation of one branch of the vestibular nerve publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00023 – volume: 94 start-page: 217 issue: 2 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0095 article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: influence of tumor size and surgical approach on incidence and response to treatment publication-title: J. Neurosurg. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0217 – volume: 129 start-page: 429 issue: 4 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0050 article-title: Comparison of facial nerve function results after translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach in medium-sized tumors publication-title: Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.4.429 – volume: 45 start-page: 375 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0020 article-title: Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results publication-title: Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.02.001 – volume: 14 start-page: 58 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0085 article-title: Ophthalmic complications following acoustic neuroma resection publication-title: Oper. Neurosurg. Hagerstown (Hagerstown) doi: 10.1093/ons/opx071 – volume: 27 start-page: 547 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0005 article-title: The natural history of vestibular schwannoma publication-title: Otol. Neurotol. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000217356.73463.e7 – volume: 114 start-page: 681 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0015 article-title: Vestibular schwannoma surgery outcomes: our multidisciplinary experience in 400 cases over 17 years publication-title: Laryngoscope doi: 10.1097/00005537-200404000-00016 – volume: 104 start-page: 40 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0070 article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leak following acoustic neuroma removal publication-title: Laryngoscope doi: 10.1288/00005537-199401000-00009 – volume: 80 start-page: 310 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0010 article-title: Is there a difference in hospital stay between patients undergoing translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid surgery for vestibular schwannoma stratified by tumor size? publication-title: J. Neurol. Surg. B Skull Base doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668541 – volume: 22 start-page: 236 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994_bib0030 article-title: Morbidity rate of the retrosigmoid versus translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection publication-title: J. Audiol. Otol. doi: 10.7874/jao.2018.00164 |
SSID | ssj0003368 |
Score | 2.3159497 |
Snippet | •To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients.•Potential... Highlights•To roughly evaluate the efficacy and safety between trans-labyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannomas patients.... To date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular schwannoma was... BackgroundTo date, the literature directly comparing the translabyrinthine approach and retrosigmoid approach in the operation of patients with vestibular... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 105994 |
SubjectTerms | Cerebrospinal fluid Confidence intervals Cranial nerves Facial nerve Headache Headaches Hearing loss Meningitis Meta-analysis Neurology Neurosurgery Retrosigmoid Schwann cells Skull Systematic review Tinnitus Translabyrinthine Tumors Vestibular schwannoma Vestibular system |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2013 dbid: .~1 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwELZWHFAvFY8-tjxkpF7DJnacTbihFSuEBJcWiZvl-AFBbIJ2gyou_HZmHCcUVahVueUxjqOZsWdGnvmGkO9FZvK8VEmkWaGiFIu4wDlSkYlRpXNTuAyrkc8vstPL9OxKXI3IrK-FwbTKsPd3e7rfrcOTSeDm5L6qJj9APTlaT4YX3NeRp-kUtfzw6SXNg3NfDoc0EVL_ViV8e4jVh4iBAXEi8y1viyJ9y0C95YB6QzTfIB-DB0mPu5_cJCNbb5H183BGvk0Ws6G1IG0cbdEYgagfl1Xd3gAFVbWhS9vC7NX1oqkM7XHFKTiw1Geegz2jHn-jxCxVChHwL1XXzUId0WO6sK2KVAAz-UQu5yc_Z6dRaKoQaRFnbcRjk7qpNmD4lUmtUIVTzDEr8jK1rnDoDzpmlBMOYi1RWqs5syxxGbfMJYp_Jmt1U9uvhJYum5oSfA6NsIbAPFGKnGmteaJAM9iYiJ6TUgfEcWx8cSf71LJb2UtAogRkJ4ExmQzj7jvMjb-OmPaCkn1FKeyBEszC_420q7CUVzKRKyZj-Ye6jUkxjHylsf80626vTXKYiGFoK1iMnz4YXsNqxyMcVdvmAWkgIEbQv3hMvnRaOLCIMw-myL-948d2yAe865Lodslau3ywe-B1teW-X1bPJuotBQ priority: 102 providerName: Elsevier |
Title | Comparison of translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma: A meta-analysis |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0303846720303371 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0303846720303371 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32540713 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2441552071 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2414006770 |
Volume | 196 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB7RVkJcEG8CZWUkrmkTO84mXNBStVpAXSGg0t4sx4-yFZuU3VSIC7-dmcQJXAqIUyIljiPP2PONPfMNwIsyt0VR6TQ2vNRxRklcCI50bBNS6cKWPqds5NNFPj_L3i7lMmy4bUNY5bAmdgu1bQztkR9yAv6So0V8dfk1pqpRdLoaSmjswB5Rl1FI13Q5OlyJEF0qHOqxiMnO_pYhfHFAmYfEf4E-Iu_K3ZZldp1xug58dkbo5A7cDuiRzXpx34Ubrr4HN0_D-fh9WB-NZQVZ41lLhgjF_H2zqtvP-AbTtWUb12Lvq_N1s7Js4BRnCF5ZF3WOtox13BsVRagy9H6_6bpu1volm7G1a3WsA5HJAzg7Of50NI9DQYXYyCRvY5HYzE-NRaOvbeakLr3mnjtZVJnzpScs6LnVXnr0s2TlnBHc8dTnwnGfavEQduumdo-BVT6f2grxhiFKQxw8WcmCG2NEqlEreARyGEllAts4Fb34ooawsgs1SECRBFQvgQgOx3aXPd_GX1tMB0GpIZsU1z-FJuH_WrptmMZblaotV4n6SBpECsTpRkzTCMqxZUAqPQL5p173B21SY0e_tDuC5-NjnOl0fKNr11zRO-gME-FfEsGjXgvHIRK8I1IUT_788adwi_6kj5Hbh912c-WeIahqqwnsHPxIJ938mcDe7M27-QKvr48X7z_8BP97Jqs |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrQRcEG8CLRgJjqEbO84mSKgqpdWWdlcIWqk34_gBW7FJ2U1V9U_xG5nJCy4FhNRbpMRx5BnPfBPPfAPwIktsmuY6Cg3PdBhTEReCIx3aIal0ajOfUDXyZJqMj-L3x_J4BX50tTCUVtnZxNpQ29LQP_INTsBfcvSIm6ffQ-oaRaerXQuNRi323cU5hmzLN3vvUL4vOd_dOdweh21XgdDIYVKFYmhjPzIWPZ-2sZM685p77mSax85nngCR51Z76THYkLlzRnDHI58Ix32kBb73GqzGAkOZAay-3Zl--NjbfiHq4jvcOSIkz_5bTfLJK6p1JMYNjEp53WA3y-LL3OFlcLd2e7u34VaLV9lWo2B3YMUVd-H6pD2Rvwfz7b6RISs9q8j1oWJdLGZF9RWfYLqwbOEqnH32ZV7OLOtYzBnCZVbnuaP3ZDXbR045sQzj7XNdFOVcv2ZbbO4qHeqWOuU-HF3JYj-AQVEW7hGw3CcjmyPCMUSiiIsnc5lyY4yINOohD0B2K6lMy29ObTa-qS6R7UR1ElAkAdVIIICNftxpw_Dx1xGjTlCqq19Fi6vQCf3fSLdsDcdSRWrJ1VB9Ig0iBeJ0IUZRAFk_ssVGDeb5p1nXOm1S_US_9lMAz_vbaFvowEgXrjyjZzD8JorBYQAPGy3sl0jwmrpRPP7zy5_BjfHh5EAd7E33n8BN-qomQ28NBtXizK0jpKvyp-0-YvD5qrfuT8moYsQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3da9RAEB9qheKL-N1o1RX0MV6ym82HIFJaj9baImjh3tZNdleveEm9Syn91_zrnEmy0ZeqCH07uGz22PnNzG9u5wPgeZGaPC91HFa80GFCRVxIjnRoIoJ0bgqXUjXy4VG6d5y8m8nZGvzwtTCUVultYmeoTVPRf-QTTsRfcvSIEzekRXzYnb45_R7SBCm6afXjNHqIHNiLcwzfVq_3d1HWLzifvv20sxcOEwbCSkZpG4rIJC6rDHpBbRIrdeE0d9zKvEysKxyRI8eNdtJh4CFLayvBLY9dKix3sRb43mtwPRMyJh3LZmOwFwnRleGhDomQfPxv1cknL6nqkXpvYHzKu1G7RZFc5hgvI76dA5zegpsDc2XbPdRuw5qt78DG4XA3fxcWO-NIQ9Y41pITRIhdLOd1-xWfYLo2bGlb3H3-ZdHMDfP9zBkSZ9ZlvKMfZV3fj5KyYxlG3ue6rpuFfsW22cK2OtRDE5V7cHwlR30f1uumtpvASpdmpkSuU1E7RTw8WcqcV1UlYo2I5AFIf5KqGjqd08CNb8qntJ0oLwFFElC9BAKYjOtO-14ff12ReUEpX8mKtlehO_q_lXY1mJCVitWKq0h9JAQRgDh9EFkcQDGuHFhSz37-adctjyY1bvRLswJ4Nn6NVoaujnRtmzN6BgNxajYYBfCgR-F4RIJ3TRzFwz-__ClsoMKq9_tHB4_gBv2oPlVvC9bb5Zl9jNyuLZ90SsTg81Vr7U8hG2WU |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+translabyrinthine+and+retrosigmoid+approach+for+treating+vestibular+schwannoma%3A+A+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical+neurology+and+neurosurgery&rft.au=Jun&rft.au=Yun-long%2C+Gao&rft.au=Yu%2C+Hai-guang&rft.au=Qing-liang%2C+Huang&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Limited&rft.issn=0303-8467&rft.eissn=1872-6968&rft.volume=196&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.clineuro.2020.105994&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F03038467%2FS0303846720X00072%2Fcov150h.gif |