Novel Technology Allowing Cone Beam Computed Tomography in 6 Seconds: A Patient Study of Comparative Image Quality

• Published in: Practical radiation oncology Vol. 14; no. 3; p. 277
• Main Authors: Robar, James L, Cherpak, Amanda, MacDonald, Robert Lee, Yashayaeva, Abigail, McAloney, David, McMaster, Natasha, Zhan, Kenny, Cwajna, Slawa, Patil, Nikhilesh, Dahn, Hannah
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2024
• Subjects: Adult; Algorithms; Breath Holding; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods; Female; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Neoplasms - radiotherapy
• ISSN: 1879-8519
• DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.10.014

The goal of this study was to evaluate the image quality provided by a novel cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) platform (HyperSight, Varian Medical Systems), a platform with enhanced reconstruction algorithms as well as rapid acquisition times. Image quality was compared with both status quo CBCT for image guidance, and to fan beam CT (FBCT) acquired on a CT simulator (CTsim). In a clinical study, 30 individuals were recruited for whom either deep inspiration (DIBH) or deep exhalation breath hold (DEBH) was used during imaging and radiation treatment of tumors involving liver, lung, breast, abdomen, chest wall, and pancreatic sites. All subjects were imaged during breath hold with CBCT on a standard image guidance platform (TrueBeam 2.7, Varian Medical Systems) and FBCT CT (CTsim, GE Optima). HyperSight imaging with both breath hold (HSBH) and free breathing (HSFB) was performed in a single session. The 4 image sets thus acquired were registered and compared using metrics quantifying artifact index, image nonuniformity, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio, and difference of Hounsfield unit (HU) from CTsim. HSBH provided less severe artifacts compared with both HSFB and TrueBeam. The severity of artifacts in HSBH images was similar to that in CTsim images, with statistically similar artifact index values. CTsim provided the best image uniformity; however, HSBH provided improved uniformity compared with both HSFB and TrueBeam. CTsim demonstrated elevated contrast compared with HyperSight imaging, but both HSBH and HSFB imaging showed superior contrast-to-noise ratio characteristics compared with TrueBeam. The median HU difference of HSBH from CTsim was within 1 HU for muscle/fat tissue, 12 HU for bone, and 14 HU for lung. The HyperSight system provides 6-second CBCT acquisition with image artifacts that are significantly reduced compared with TrueBeam and comparable to those in CTsim FBCT imaging. HyperSight breath hold imaging was of higher quality compared with free breathing imaging on the same system. The median HU value in HyperSight breath hold imaging is within 15 HU of that in CTsim imaging for muscle, fat, bone, and lung tissue types, indicating the utility of image data for direct dose calculation in adaptive workflows.