Non-surgical treatment of post-surgical bile duct injury: Clinical implications and outcomes
AIM:To investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries(BDIs).METHODS:The study patients were enrolled from the pancreatobiliary units of a tertiary teaching hospital for the treatment of BDIs after hepat...
Saved in:
Published in | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 20; no. 22; pp. 6924 - 6931 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
14.06.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | AIM:To investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries(BDIs).METHODS:The study patients were enrolled from the pancreatobiliary units of a tertiary teaching hospital for the treatment of BDIs after hepatobiliary tract surgeries,excluding operations for liver transplantation andmalignancies,from January 1999 to August 2010.A total of 5167 patients underwent operations,and 77patients had BDIs following surgery.The primary end point was the treatment success rate according to different types of BDIs sustained using endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches.The type of BDI was defined using one of the following diagnostic tools:endoscopic retrograde cholangiography,percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography,computed tomography scan,and magnetic resonance cholangiography.Patients with a final diagnosis of BDI underwent endoscopic and/or percutaneous interventions for the treatment of bile leak and/or stricture if clinically indicated.Patient consent was obtained,and study approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board in accordance with the legal regulations of the Human Clinical Research Center at the Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul,South Korea.RESULTS:A total of 77 patients were enrolled in the study.They were divided into three groups according to type of BDI.Among them,55 patients(71%)underwent cholecystectomy.Thirty-six patients(47%)had bile leak only(type 1),31 patients had biliary stricture only(type 2),and 10 patients had both bile leak and biliary stricture(type 3).Their initial treatment modalities were non-surgical.The success rate of non-surgical treatment in each group was as follows:BDI type 1:94%;type 2:71%;and type 3:30%.Clinical parameters such as demographic factors,primary disease,operation method,type of operation,non-surgical treatment modalities,endoscopic procedure steps,type of BDI,time to diagnosis and treatment duration were evaluated to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting the success rate.The type of BDI was a statistically significant prognostic factor in determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment.In addition,a shorter time to diagnosis of BDI after the operation correlated significantly with higher success rates in the treatment of type 1 BDIs.CONCLUSION:Endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches can be used as an initial treatment in type1 and 2 BDIs.However,surgical intervention is a treatment of choice in type 3 BDI. |
---|---|
AbstractList | AIMTo investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries (BDIs). METHODSThe study patients were enrolled from the pancreatobiliary units of a tertiary teaching hospital for the treatment of BDIs after hepatobiliary tract surgeries, excluding operations for liver transplantation and malignancies, from January 1999 to August 2010. A total of 5167 patients underwent operations, and 77 patients had BDIs following surgery. The primary end point was the treatment success rate according to different types of BDIs sustained using endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches. The type of BDI was defined using one of the following diagnostic tools: endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance cholangiography. Patients with a final diagnosis of BDI underwent endoscopic and/or percutaneous interventions for the treatment of bile leak and/or stricture if clinically indicated. Patient consent was obtained, and study approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board in accordance with the legal regulations of the Human Clinical Research Center at the Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. RESULTSA total of 77 patients were enrolled in the study. They were divided into three groups according to type of BDI. Among them, 55 patients (71%) underwent cholecystectomy. Thirty-six patients (47%) had bile leak only (type 1), 31 patients had biliary stricture only (type 2), and 10 patients had both bile leak and biliary stricture (type 3). Their initial treatment modalities were non-surgical. The success rate of non-surgical treatment in each group was as follows: BDI type 1: 94%; type 2: 71%; and type 3: 30%. Clinical parameters such as demographic factors, primary disease, operation method, type of operation, non-surgical treatment modalities, endoscopic procedure steps, type of BDI, time to diagnosis and treatment duration were evaluated to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting the success rate. The type of BDI was a statistically significant prognostic factor in determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment. In addition, a shorter time to diagnosis of BDI after the operation correlated significantly with higher success rates in the treatment of type 1 BDIs. CONCLUSIONEndoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches can be used as an initial treatment in type 1 and 2 BDIs. However, surgical intervention is a treatment of choice in type 3 BDI. AIM: To investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries (BDIs). METHODS: The study patients were enrolled from the pancreatobiliary units of a tertiary teaching hospital for the treatment of BDIs after hepatobiliary tract surgeries, excluding operations for liver transplantation and malignancies, from January 1999 to August 2010. A total of 5167 patients underwent operations, and 77 patients had BDIs following surgery. The primary end point was the treatment success rate according to different types of BDIs sustained using endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches. The type of BDI was defined using one of the following diagnostic tools: endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance cholangiography. Patients with a final diagnosis of BDI underwent endoscopic and/or percutaneous interventions for the treatment of bile leak and/or stricture if clinically indicated. Patient consent was obtained, and study approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board in accordance with the legal regulations of the Human Clinical Research Center at the Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were enrolled in the study. They were divided into three groups according to type of BDI. Among them, 55 patients (71%) underwent cholecystectomy. Thirty-six patients (47%) had bile leak only (type 1), 31 patients had biliary stricture only (type 2), and 10 patients had both bile leak and biliary stricture (type 3). Their initial treatment modalities were non-surgical. The success rate of non-surgical treatment in each group was as follows: BDI type 1: 94%; type 2: 71%; and type 3: 30%. Clinical parameters such as demographic factors, primary disease, operation method, type of operation, non-surgical treatment modalities, endoscopic procedure steps, type of BDI, time to diagnosis and treatment duration were evaluated to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting the success rate. The type of BDI was a statistically significant prognostic factor in determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment. In addition, a shorter time to diagnosis of BDI after the operation correlated significantly with higher success rates in the treatment of type 1 BDIs. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches can be used as an initial treatment in type 1 and 2 BDIs. However, surgical intervention is a treatment of choice in type 3 BDI. AIM:To investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries(BDIs).METHODS:The study patients were enrolled from the pancreatobiliary units of a tertiary teaching hospital for the treatment of BDIs after hepatobiliary tract surgeries,excluding operations for liver transplantation andmalignancies,from January 1999 to August 2010.A total of 5167 patients underwent operations,and 77patients had BDIs following surgery.The primary end point was the treatment success rate according to different types of BDIs sustained using endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches.The type of BDI was defined using one of the following diagnostic tools:endoscopic retrograde cholangiography,percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography,computed tomography scan,and magnetic resonance cholangiography.Patients with a final diagnosis of BDI underwent endoscopic and/or percutaneous interventions for the treatment of bile leak and/or stricture if clinically indicated.Patient consent was obtained,and study approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board in accordance with the legal regulations of the Human Clinical Research Center at the Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul,South Korea.RESULTS:A total of 77 patients were enrolled in the study.They were divided into three groups according to type of BDI.Among them,55 patients(71%)underwent cholecystectomy.Thirty-six patients(47%)had bile leak only(type 1),31 patients had biliary stricture only(type 2),and 10 patients had both bile leak and biliary stricture(type 3).Their initial treatment modalities were non-surgical.The success rate of non-surgical treatment in each group was as follows:BDI type 1:94%;type 2:71%;and type 3:30%.Clinical parameters such as demographic factors,primary disease,operation method,type of operation,non-surgical treatment modalities,endoscopic procedure steps,type of BDI,time to diagnosis and treatment duration were evaluated to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting the success rate.The type of BDI was a statistically significant prognostic factor in determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment.In addition,a shorter time to diagnosis of BDI after the operation correlated significantly with higher success rates in the treatment of type 1 BDIs.CONCLUSION:Endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches can be used as an initial treatment in type1 and 2 BDIs.However,surgical intervention is a treatment of choice in type 3 BDI. To investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries (BDIs). The study patients were enrolled from the pancreatobiliary units of a tertiary teaching hospital for the treatment of BDIs after hepatobiliary tract surgeries, excluding operations for liver transplantation and malignancies, from January 1999 to August 2010. A total of 5167 patients underwent operations, and 77 patients had BDIs following surgery. The primary end point was the treatment success rate according to different types of BDIs sustained using endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches. The type of BDI was defined using one of the following diagnostic tools: endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance cholangiography. Patients with a final diagnosis of BDI underwent endoscopic and/or percutaneous interventions for the treatment of bile leak and/or stricture if clinically indicated. Patient consent was obtained, and study approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board in accordance with the legal regulations of the Human Clinical Research Center at the Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. A total of 77 patients were enrolled in the study. They were divided into three groups according to type of BDI. Among them, 55 patients (71%) underwent cholecystectomy. Thirty-six patients (47%) had bile leak only (type 1), 31 patients had biliary stricture only (type 2), and 10 patients had both bile leak and biliary stricture (type 3). Their initial treatment modalities were non-surgical. The success rate of non-surgical treatment in each group was as follows: BDI type 1: 94%; type 2: 71%; and type 3: 30%. Clinical parameters such as demographic factors, primary disease, operation method, type of operation, non-surgical treatment modalities, endoscopic procedure steps, type of BDI, time to diagnosis and treatment duration were evaluated to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting the success rate. The type of BDI was a statistically significant prognostic factor in determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment. In addition, a shorter time to diagnosis of BDI after the operation correlated significantly with higher success rates in the treatment of type 1 BDIs. Endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches can be used as an initial treatment in type 1 and 2 BDIs. However, surgical intervention is a treatment of choice in type 3 BDI. |
Author | Young Ook Eum Joo Kyung Park Jaeyoung Chun Sang-Hyub Lee Ji Kon Ryu Yong-Tae Kim Yong-Bum Yoon Chang Jin Yoon Ho-Seong Han Jin-Hyeok Hwang |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Internal medicine,Cheongju St. Mary’s Hospital,Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568,South Korea Department of Internal Medicine,Seoul National University Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine,Seoul 110-744,South Korea Department of Internal Medicine,Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,Gyeonggi-do 463-707,South Korea Department of Radiology,Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,Gyeonggi-do 463-707,South Korea Department of Surgery,Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,Gyeonggi-do 463-707,South Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Young Ook surname: Eum fullname: Eum, Young Ook organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Joo Kyung surname: Park fullname: Park, Joo Kyung organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Jaeyoung surname: Chun fullname: Chun, Jaeyoung organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Sang-Hyub surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Sang-Hyub organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Ji Kon surname: Ryu fullname: Ryu, Ji Kon organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea – sequence: 6 givenname: Yong-Tae surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Yong-Tae organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea – sequence: 7 givenname: Yong-Bum surname: Yoon fullname: Yoon, Yong-Bum organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea – sequence: 8 givenname: Chang Jin surname: Yoon fullname: Yoon, Chang Jin organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea – sequence: 9 givenname: Ho-Seong surname: Han fullname: Han, Ho-Seong organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea – sequence: 10 givenname: Jin-Hyeok surname: Hwang fullname: Hwang, Jin-Hyeok organization: Young Ook Eum, Department of Internal medicine, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568, South Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944484$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVkc1v1DAQxS1URLeFOyeUI5cs4691zAEJrYBWquACNyTLsZ3Uq8Te2k6r_vd46bKAD_ZI782bsX4X6CzE4BB6jWFNBevePezG9T2BtSdkvZGEPUMrQrBsScfgDK0wgGglJeIcXeS8AyCUcvICnRMmGWMdW6GfX2No85JGb_TUlOR0mV0oTRyafczlr9T7yTV2MaXxYbekx_fNdvLht-Tn_VSL4mPIjQ62iUsxcXb5JXo-6Cm7V8f3Ev34_On79qq9-fblevvxpjUcNqUllgrDO2nBiK43WmLijGZOY2I1BYEHbMB2AwxW8qEnlAshnRmYYVL01tFL9OEpd7_0s7OmfiDpSe2Tn3V6VFF79b8S_K0a471iwLGktAa8PQakeLe4XNTss3HTpIOLS1aYU8k2dZVNtcKT1aSYc3LDaQwGdYCiKhRVoagKRR2g1JY3_653avhDoRroMfM2hvHOh_HkkdAdjuRQjZITDoeq3oT-Aq1ZnYg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_017_0411_6 crossref_primary_10_1159_000533794 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_14937 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastrohep_2017_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_017_3400_7 crossref_primary_10_22575_interventionalradiology_2_1_10 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_endomx_2015_03_001 crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v15_i4_592 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04143_x crossref_primary_10_26693_jmbs05_01_009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40719_017_0099_6 crossref_primary_10_5223_pghn_2016_19_4_281 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amsu_2018_09_018 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_020_01043_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12113786 crossref_primary_10_16931__1995_5464_2023_4_32_41 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2016_03_039 crossref_primary_10_1177_00031348231173945 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13017_021_00369_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2015_05_004 crossref_primary_10_5582_bst_2017_01176 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i30_6955 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastre_2018_03_009 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2014 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2014 |
DBID | 2RA 92L CQIGP W91 ~WA CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6924 |
DatabaseName | 维普_期刊 中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点 维普中文期刊数据库 中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生 中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点 Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Non-surgical treatment of post-surgical bile duct injury: Clinical implications and outcomes |
EISSN | 2219-2840 |
EndPage | 6931 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_3748_wjg_v20_i22_6924 24944484 90888889504849525050485052 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Republic of Korea |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Republic of Korea |
GroupedDBID | --- 123 29R 2B. 2C~ 2RA 2WC 36B 53G 5VR 8WL 92F 92I 92L 93N 93R AAKDD ACGFO AENEX AFUIB ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CCEZO CHBEP CIEJG CQIGP CS3 CW9 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EMB F5P FA0 FRP GX1 HYE M~E OK1 P2P RNS RPM SV3 TCJ TGQ TR2 W91 WFFXF XSB ~WA CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-2d37c589d0c78bca912eca4ea12da3071f1c0d8f0fd95fb235779ecf4c497bde3 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1007-9327 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 01 02:32:34 EDT 2023 Fri Apr 12 12:11:09 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 00:27:29 EDT 2024 Thu May 23 23:18:24 EDT 2024 Wed Feb 14 10:28:39 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 22 |
Keywords | Biliary stricture Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography Bile duct Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c506t-2d37c589d0c78bca912eca4ea12da3071f1c0d8f0fd95fb235779ecf4c497bde3 |
Notes | Young Ook Eum;Joo Kyung Park;Jaeyoung Chun;Sang-Hyub Lee;Ji Kon Ryu;Yong-Tae Kim;Yong-Bum Yoon;Chang Jin Yoon;Ho-Seong Han;Jin-Hyeok Hwang;Department of Internal medicine,Cheongju St. Mary’s Hospital,Chungcheongbuk-do 360-568,South Korea;Department of Internal Medicine,Seoul National University Hospital,Seoul National University College of Medicine,Seoul 110-744,South Korea;Department of Internal Medicine,Seoul National University College of Medicine,Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,Gyeonggi-do 463-707,South Korea;Department of Radiology,Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,Gyeonggi-do 463-707,South Korea;Department of Surgery,Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,Gyeonggi-do 463-707,South Korea ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author contributions: Eum YO and Park JK equally contributed to this work as first authors; Eum YO, Park JK and Hwang JH designed the research; Eum YO, Park JK, Chun JY, Lee SH, Yoon CJ and Han HS performed research; Eum YO, Park JK, Hwang JH analyzed data and drafted article; Ryu JK, Kim YT, Yoon YB and Hwang JH revised the paper with critically important intellectual content; Eun YO and Park JK wrote the paper. Telephone: +82-31-7877017 Fax: +82-31-7874051 Correspondence to: Jin-Hyeok Hwang, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do 463-707, South Korea. pdoctor7@snu.ac.kr |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6924 |
PMID | 24944484 |
PQID | 1539463076 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4051933 proquest_miscellaneous_1539463076 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v20_i22_6924 pubmed_primary_24944484 chongqing_primary_90888889504849525050485052 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-06-14 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-06-14 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2014 text: 2014-06-14 day: 14 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG |
PublicationTitleAlternate | World Journal of Gastroenterology |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
References | 17543307 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Aug;66(2):265-73 21484487 - J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jun;15(6):1005-6 3427352 - Br J Surg. 1987 Dec;74(12):1095-9 7840384 - Am J Surg. 1995 Feb;169(2):220-6 15920680 - Surg Endosc. 2005 Jul;19(7):967-73 17531644 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jun;65(7):1069-72 15358328 - J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;8(6):679-85 8903564 - Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996 Jan;6(1):81-105 15730933 - Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005 Feb;4(1):113-6 20298660 - G Chir. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1-2):16-9 15185435 - Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 May 22;148(21):1020-4 9543520 - Surg Endosc. 1998 Apr;12(4):315-21 11729381 - Ann Surg. 2001 Dec;234(6):750-7 17595232 - Gut. 2007 Nov;56(11):1599-605 21562917 - J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Aug;15(8):1323-4 21242709 - Pancreatology. 2010;10(6):695-701 17258983 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Feb;65(2):247-52 7311057 - Rinsho Hoshasen. 1981 Oct;26(10):1075-9 14759778 - J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Feb;198(2):218-26 22251523 - Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Jan-Feb;59(113):51-3 18028921 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Feb;67(2):375-6 8452402 - Ann Surg. 1993 Mar;217(3):237-43 20529098 - Clin Transplant. 2010 Nov-Dec;24(6):E230-5 20801692 - J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Oct;211(4):495-502 9179112 - J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Jun;184(6):571-8 16371721 - Korean J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec;46(6):463-70 7904002 - Lancet. 1994 Jan 15;343(8890):135-8 19281705 - Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2009 Apr;11(2):160-6 8566842 - Gut. 1996 Jan;38(1):141-7 10668872 - Arch Surg. 2000 Feb;135(2):153-7 |
References_xml | |
SSID | ssj0023352 |
Score | 2.27574 |
Snippet | AIM:To investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct... To investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries (BDIs). The... AIMTo investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries (BDIs).... AIM: To investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed chongqing |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 6924 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis Anastomotic Leak - etiology Anastomotic Leak - therapy Bile Ducts - injuries Bile Ducts - surgery Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Catheters cholangiography Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - instrumentation Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance Cholestasis - diagnosis Cholestasis - etiology Cholestasis - therapy Constriction, Pathologic Dilatation Drainage - adverse effects Drainage - instrumentation Endoscopic Equipment Design Evidence-Based Medicine Female Hospitals, University Humans Male Middle Aged Percutaneous Republic of Korea retrograde Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic - adverse effects Stents Tertiary Care Centers Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
Title | Non-surgical treatment of post-surgical bile duct injury: Clinical implications and outcomes |
URI | http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/84123X/201422/90888889504849525050485052.html https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944484 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1539463076 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4051933 |
Volume | 20 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1NT9wwFHwCTr2gVv0gfFSu1EslnE1sx4m5VQiEKoF6AIlDpcixHQgCZ2Gz7d_vczZJWbg1p0h2rMTzYs-Tx2OAr4zpQhZKU1dUjIo0lVQ7V9MMKVLiJBfShN3I5xfy7Er8uM6uNyAb98L0on1TNbG_f4h9c9trK-cPZjbqxGY_z49Fzzv4bBM2c87HFH3IssImon6JM8kpkpN8tTYZXFZmf-5u4t8siRvGYomJR3ACFkpghiKCtcJt628eccJYn6Je8c6X8sln89HpW9geiCT5vnrhd7Dh_Hv4ddF6ulg-9cMZmUTkpK3JvF10_4oqHAxIsHoljb_Dbj0ig0HoPWmeacyJ9pa0yw7D0i0-wNXpyeXxGR3OT6AmS2RHmeW5yQplE5MXldEqZc5o4XTKrMZ_O61Tk9iiTmqrsroKxje5cqYWRqi8so5_hC3fercDxEhMrGwwBrJcGMOUwWaUyJLaSO04j-Bw6r5yvvLJKIOECi-V4SiBeVggW3gXTs6L4NvYw1NtzEYCSCWCVCJIJYJUBpAi-DJCUGLoh_UM7V27XJQ4WCsh8UNkBJ9WkEytjbhGkK-BNVUIttrrJRhtvb32EF27__3kHrxBWiWCoCwV-7DVPS3dAVKXrvrch-pf_ADugw |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,891,27957,27958,53827,53829 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFL0qZQEbHuIVysNIbJBwJnEcJ2aHKqoBOiMWLeoCKXIcp01pnWknAYmv5zovOmUFWUWyE8k69r3nysfHAK8ZU6lIpaImzRnlYSioMqakMVKkwIiIC-1OIy-WYn7IPx3FR1sQj2dhOtG-zivfnp37tjrptJWrcz0bdWKzL4td3vGOaHYDbuJ6ZclYpA91ljtG1G1yBglFepL0u5POZ2X28_TY_8ECv2LMF1h6OC9gLjnWKNyZK5zU9vgCU8ZmkvqLeV4XUF7JSHt34es4ll6I8t1vm9zXv67ZPP7zYO_BnYGjkvd9833YMvYBfFvWlq7byy5SkkmfTuqSrOp186cpxzhDnIssqewpIvaODN6jZ6S6Il8nyhakbhuc8Wb9EA73PhzszulwNQPVcSAayooo0XEqi0Anaa6VDJnRihsVskJh2AjLUAdFWgZlIeMyd546iTS65JrLJC9M9Ai2bW3NEyBaYM1WOM-hIuJaM6nxN5LHQamFMlHkwdsJl2zVW3BkTp2Fj4wxAGGJ53gcvrlL-Tx4M0I39cZCx6GfIfoZop8h-plD34NXI7YZriq3VaKsqdt1hnlAcoEDER487rGe_jZOGA-SjVkwdXCO3ZstiG3n3D1g-fS_v3wJt-YHi_1s_-Py8w7cRvbGnW4t5M9gu7lszXNkSE3-olsPvwHNwRCD |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LatwwFBVtCqWbNqWPOH2p0E2hfsmybGVXkg7pI0MWDYRSELIkJ04TeZKxW-jX58qvzqS7eGWwLBD36OpcdHSE0DtCZM5yLn2TF8Snccx8aUzpp0CRIsMSypQ7jXwwZ_tH9Mtxerxy1Vcn2ldFFdjzi8BWp522cnGhwlEnFh4e7NKOdyThQpfhXXQP5izhY6E-1FruKFG30RllPlCUrN-hdF4r4Z-zk-A3iYKKkIBB-eH8gCmnUKdQZ7BwWtuTS1g21heq_9jnTRHlyqo0e4R-jOPpxSi_grYpAvX3htXjrQa8iR4OXBV_7Js8RneMfYJ-zmvrL9urLmPiSaeO6xIv6mXz71MB-QY7N1lc2TOI3A4ePEjPcbUiY8fSaly3DSDfLJ-io9mn77v7_nBFg6_SiDU-0Umm0pzrSGV5oSSPiVGSGhkTLSF9xGWsIp2XUal5WhbOWyfjRpVUUZ4V2iTP0IatrdlCWDGo3bTzHtIJVYpwBd1wmkalYtIkiYc-TLERi96KQziVFjw8hUQEpZ7jc_DmLufz0PsxfFNrKHgcAgQgQAACBCBAOAR46O0YXwGzy22ZSGvqdilgPeCUwUCYh5738Z56G0HjoWwNCVMD59y9_gXi2zl4D_HcvvWfb9D9w72Z-PZ5_vUFegAkjjr5Wkxfoo3mqjWvgCg1xetuSlwDVPUTAw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-surgical+treatment+of+post-surgical+bile+duct+injury%3A+Clinical+implications+and+outcomes&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E8%83%83%E8%82%A0%E7%97%85%E5%AD%A6%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88%EF%BC%88%E7%94%B5%E5%AD%90%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89&rft.au=Young+Ook+Eum+Joo+Kyung+Park+Jaeyoung+Chun+Sang-Hyub+Lee+Ji+Kon+Ryu+Yong-Tae+Kim+Yong-Bum+Yoon+Chang+Jin+Yoon+Ho-Seong+Han+Jin-Hyeok+Hwang&rft.date=2014-06-14&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=6924&rft.epage=6931&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748%2Fwjg.v20.i22.6924&rft.externalDocID=90888889504849525050485052 |
thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F84123X%2F84123X.jpg |