Reproducibility of Single-Subject Functional Connectivity Measurements

• Published in: American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 548 - 555
• Main Authors: Anderson, J.S., Ferguson, M.A., Lopez-Larson, M., Yurgelun-Todd, D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oak Brook, IL American Society of Neuroradiology 01.03.2011
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Brain - physiology; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording; Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology; Functional; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Nerve Net - physiology; Nervous system; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Visual Perception - physiology; Young Adult; Human; Nervous system diseases; Radiodiagnosis; Reproducibility
• DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2330
• ISSN: 0195-6108; 1936-959X

Measurements of resting-state functional connectivity have increasingly been used for characterization of neuropathologic and neurodevelopmental populations. We collected data to characterize how much imaging time is necessary to obtain reproducible quantitative functional connectivity measurements needed for a reliable single-subject diagnostic test. We obtained 100 five-minute BOLD scans on a single subject, divided into 10 sessions of 10 scans each, with the subject at rest or while watching video clips of cartoons. These data were compared with resting-state BOLD scans from 36 healthy control subjects by evaluating the correlation between each pair of 64 small spheric regions of interest obtained from a published functional brain parcellation. Single-subject and group data converged to reliable estimates of individual and population connectivity values proportional to 1 / sqrt(n). Dramatic improvements in reliability were seen by using ≤25 minutes of imaging time, with smaller improvements for additional time. Functional connectivity "fingerprints" for the individual and population began diverging at approximately 15 minutes of imaging time, with increasing reliability even at 4 hours of imaging time. Twenty-five minutes of BOLD imaging time was required before any individual connections could reliably discriminate an individual from a group of healthy control subjects. A classifier discriminating scans during which our subject was resting or watching cartoons was 95% accurate at 10 minutes and 100% accurate at 15 minutes of imaging time. An individual subject and control population converged to reliable different functional connectivity profiles that were task-modulated and could be discriminated with sufficient imaging time.