Wireless pH‐motility capsule for colonic transit: prospective comparison with radiopaque markers in chronic constipation

Background  Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information. Methods  We proposed to validate wireless motility capsule (WMC), that measures pH, pressure and temperature, to ROM measurement of CT...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 22; no. 8; pp. 874 - e233
Main Authors Camilleri, M., Thorne, N. K., Ringel, Y., Hasler, W. L., Kuo, B., Esfandyari, T., Gupta, A., Scott, S. M., Mccallum, R. W., Parkman, H. P., Soffer, E., Wilding, G. E., Semler, J. R., Rao, S. S.c.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background  Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information. Methods  We proposed to validate wireless motility capsule (WMC), that measures pH, pressure and temperature, to ROM measurement of CT in patients with symptomatic constipation evaluated at multiple centers. Of 208 patients recruited, 158 eligible patients underwent simultaneous measurement of colonic transit time (CTT) using ROM (Metcalf method, cut off for delay >67 h), and WMC (cutoff for delay >59 h). The study was designed to demonstrate substantial equivalence, defined as diagnostic agreement >65% for patients who had normal or delayed ROM transit. Key Results  Fifty‐nine of 157 patients had delayed ROM CT. Transit results by the two methods differed: ROM median 55.0 h [IQR 31.0–85.0] and WMC (43.5 h [21.7–70.3], P < 0.001. The positive percent agreement between WMC and ROM for delayed transit was ∼80%; positive agreement in 47 by WMC/59 by ROM or 0.796 (95% CI = 0.67–0.98); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%) P = 0.01. The negative percent agreement (normal transit) was ∼91%: 89 by WMC/98 by ROM or 0.908 (95% CI = 0.83–0.96); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%), P = 0.00001. Overall device agreement was 87%. There were significant correlations (P < 0.001) between ROM and WMC transit (CTT [r = 0.707] and between ROM and combined small and large bowel transit [r = 0.704]). There were no significant adverse events. Conclusions & Inferences  The 87% overall agreement (positive and negative) validates WMC relative to ROM in differentiating slow vs normal CT in a multicenter clinical study of constipation.
AbstractList Background  Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information. Methods  We proposed to validate wireless motility capsule (WMC), that measures pH, pressure and temperature, to ROM measurement of CT in patients with symptomatic constipation evaluated at multiple centers. Of 208 patients recruited, 158 eligible patients underwent simultaneous measurement of colonic transit time (CTT) using ROM (Metcalf method, cut off for delay >67 h), and WMC (cutoff for delay >59 h). The study was designed to demonstrate substantial equivalence, defined as diagnostic agreement >65% for patients who had normal or delayed ROM transit. Key Results  Fifty‐nine of 157 patients had delayed ROM CT. Transit results by the two methods differed: ROM median 55.0 h [IQR 31.0–85.0] and WMC (43.5 h [21.7–70.3], P < 0.001. The positive percent agreement between WMC and ROM for delayed transit was ∼80%; positive agreement in 47 by WMC/59 by ROM or 0.796 (95% CI = 0.67–0.98); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%) P = 0.01. The negative percent agreement (normal transit) was ∼91%: 89 by WMC/98 by ROM or 0.908 (95% CI = 0.83–0.96); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%), P = 0.00001. Overall device agreement was 87%. There were significant correlations (P < 0.001) between ROM and WMC transit (CTT [r = 0.707] and between ROM and combined small and large bowel transit [r = 0.704]). There were no significant adverse events. Conclusions & Inferences  The 87% overall agreement (positive and negative) validates WMC relative to ROM in differentiating slow vs normal CT in a multicenter clinical study of constipation.
Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information. We proposed to validate wireless motility capsule (WMC), that measures pH, pressure and temperature, to ROM measurement of CT in patients with symptomatic constipation evaluated at multiple centers. Of 208 patients recruited, 158 eligible patients underwent simultaneous measurement of CT time (CTT) using ROM (Metcalf method, cut off for delay >67 h), and WMC (cutoff for delay >59 h). The study was designed to demonstrate substantial equivalence, defined as diagnostic agreement >65% for patients who had normal or delayed ROM transit. 59/157 patients had delayed ROM CT. Transit results by the two methods differed: ROM median 55.0h [IQR 31.0–85.0] and WMC (43.5h [21.7–70.3], p<0.001. The positive percent agreement between WMC and ROM for delayed transit was ~80%; positive agreement in 47 by WMC/59 by ROM or 0.796 (95% CI = 0.67–0.98); agreement vs. null hypothesis (65%) p=0.01. The negative percent agreement (normal transit) was ~91%: 89 by WMC/98 by ROM or 0.908 (95% CI = 0.83–0.96); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%), p=0.00001. Overall device agreement was 87%. There were significant correlations (p<0.001) between ROM and WMC transit (CTT [r=0.707] and between ROM and combined small and large bowel transit [r=0.704]). There were no significant adverse events. The 87% overall agreement (positive and negative) validates WMC relative to ROM in differentiating slow versus normal CT in a multicenter clinical study of constipation.
Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information.BACKGROUNDColon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information.We proposed to validate wireless motility capsule (WMC), that measures pH, pressure and temperature, to ROM measurement of CT in patients with symptomatic constipation evaluated at multiple centers. Of 208 patients recruited, 158 eligible patients underwent simultaneous measurement of colonic transit time (CTT) using ROM (Metcalf method, cut off for delay >67 h), and WMC (cutoff for delay >59 h). The study was designed to demonstrate substantial equivalence, defined as diagnostic agreement >65% for patients who had normal or delayed ROM transit.METHODSWe proposed to validate wireless motility capsule (WMC), that measures pH, pressure and temperature, to ROM measurement of CT in patients with symptomatic constipation evaluated at multiple centers. Of 208 patients recruited, 158 eligible patients underwent simultaneous measurement of colonic transit time (CTT) using ROM (Metcalf method, cut off for delay >67 h), and WMC (cutoff for delay >59 h). The study was designed to demonstrate substantial equivalence, defined as diagnostic agreement >65% for patients who had normal or delayed ROM transit.Fifty-nine of 157 patients had delayed ROM CT. Transit results by the two methods differed: ROM median 55.0 h [IQR 31.0-85.0] and WMC (43.5 h [21.7-70.3], P < 0.001. The positive percent agreement between WMC and ROM for delayed transit was approximately 80%; positive agreement in 47 by WMC/59 by ROM or 0.796 (95% CI = 0.67-0.98); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%) P = 0.01. The negative percent agreement (normal transit) was approximately 91%: 89 by WMC/98 by ROM or 0.908 (95% CI = 0.83-0.96); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%), P = 0.00001. Overall device agreement was 87%. There were significant correlations (P < 0.001) between ROM and WMC transit (CTT [r = 0.707] and between ROM and combined small and large bowel transit [r = 0.704]). There were no significant adverse events.KEY RESULTSFifty-nine of 157 patients had delayed ROM CT. Transit results by the two methods differed: ROM median 55.0 h [IQR 31.0-85.0] and WMC (43.5 h [21.7-70.3], P < 0.001. The positive percent agreement between WMC and ROM for delayed transit was approximately 80%; positive agreement in 47 by WMC/59 by ROM or 0.796 (95% CI = 0.67-0.98); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%) P = 0.01. The negative percent agreement (normal transit) was approximately 91%: 89 by WMC/98 by ROM or 0.908 (95% CI = 0.83-0.96); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%), P = 0.00001. Overall device agreement was 87%. There were significant correlations (P < 0.001) between ROM and WMC transit (CTT [r = 0.707] and between ROM and combined small and large bowel transit [r = 0.704]). There were no significant adverse events.The 87% overall agreement (positive and negative) validates WMC relative to ROM in differentiating slow vs normal CT in a multicenter clinical study of constipation.CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCESThe 87% overall agreement (positive and negative) validates WMC relative to ROM in differentiating slow vs normal CT in a multicenter clinical study of constipation.
Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information. We proposed to validate wireless motility capsule (WMC), that measures pH, pressure and temperature, to ROM measurement of CT in patients with symptomatic constipation evaluated at multiple centers. Of 208 patients recruited, 158 eligible patients underwent simultaneous measurement of colonic transit time (CTT) using ROM (Metcalf method, cut off for delay >67 h), and WMC (cutoff for delay >59 h). The study was designed to demonstrate substantial equivalence, defined as diagnostic agreement >65% for patients who had normal or delayed ROM transit. Fifty-nine of 157 patients had delayed ROM CT. Transit results by the two methods differed: ROM median 55.0 h [IQR 31.0-85.0] and WMC (43.5 h [21.7-70.3], P < 0.001. The positive percent agreement between WMC and ROM for delayed transit was approximately 80%; positive agreement in 47 by WMC/59 by ROM or 0.796 (95% CI = 0.67-0.98); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%) P = 0.01. The negative percent agreement (normal transit) was approximately 91%: 89 by WMC/98 by ROM or 0.908 (95% CI = 0.83-0.96); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%), P = 0.00001. Overall device agreement was 87%. There were significant correlations (P < 0.001) between ROM and WMC transit (CTT [r = 0.707] and between ROM and combined small and large bowel transit [r = 0.704]). There were no significant adverse events. The 87% overall agreement (positive and negative) validates WMC relative to ROM in differentiating slow vs normal CT in a multicenter clinical study of constipation.
AbstractBackground Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information.Methods We proposed to validate wireless motility capsule (WMC), that measures pH, pressure and temperature, to ROM measurement of CT in patients with symptomatic constipation evaluated at multiple centers. Of 208 patients recruited, 158 eligible patients underwent simultaneous measurement of colonic transit time (CTT) using ROM (Metcalf method, cut off for delay >67 h), and WMC (cutoff for delay >59 h). The study was designed to demonstrate substantial equivalence, defined as diagnostic agreement >65% for patients who had normal or delayed ROM transit.Key Results Fifty-nine of 157 patients had delayed ROM CT. Transit results by the two methods differed: ROM median 55.0 h [IQR 31.0-85.0] and WMC (43.5 h [21.7-70.3], P < 0.001. The positive percent agreement between WMC and ROM for delayed transit was similar to 80%; positive agreement in 47 by WMC-59 by ROM or 0.796 (95% CI = 0.67-0.98); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%) P = 0.01. The negative percent agreement (normal transit) was similar to 91%: 89 by WMC-98 by ROM or 0.908 (95% CI = 0.83-0.96); agreement vs null hypothesis (65%), P = 0.00001. Overall device agreement was 87%. There were significant correlations (P < 0.001) between ROM and WMC transit (CTT [r = 0.707] and between ROM and combined small and large bowel transit [r = 0.704]). There were no significant adverse events.Conclusions & Inferences The 87% overall agreement (positive and negative) validates WMC relative to ROM in differentiating slow vs normal CT in a multicenter clinical study of constipation.
Author Esfandyari, T.
Parkman, H. P.
Soffer, E.
Camilleri, M.
Wilding, G. E.
Hasler, W. L.
Gupta, A.
Rao, S. S.c.
Kuo, B.
Semler, J. R.
Thorne, N. K.
Scott, S. M.
Mccallum, R. W.
Ringel, Y.
AuthorAffiliation 13 Department of Biostatistics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
9 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
3 Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina
5 Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2 Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
6 University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
7 Department of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1 College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
11 Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom
10 University of Buffalo VA Medical Center, Buffalo, New York
4 Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
14 SmartPill Corporation, Buffalo, New York
12 Texas Tech University, El Paso, Texas
8 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 4 Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
– name: 10 University of Buffalo VA Medical Center, Buffalo, New York
– name: 2 Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
– name: 12 Texas Tech University, El Paso, Texas
– name: 13 Department of Biostatistics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
– name: 5 Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
– name: 3 Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina
– name: 7 Department of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
– name: 11 Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom
– name: 6 University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
– name: 8 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
– name: 9 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
– name: 1 College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
– name: 14 SmartPill Corporation, Buffalo, New York
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: M.
  surname: Camilleri
  fullname: Camilleri, M.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: N. K.
  surname: Thorne
  fullname: Thorne, N. K.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Y.
  surname: Ringel
  fullname: Ringel, Y.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: W. L.
  surname: Hasler
  fullname: Hasler, W. L.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: B.
  surname: Kuo
  fullname: Kuo, B.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: T.
  surname: Esfandyari
  fullname: Esfandyari, T.
– sequence: 7
  givenname: A.
  surname: Gupta
  fullname: Gupta, A.
– sequence: 8
  givenname: S. M.
  surname: Scott
  fullname: Scott, S. M.
– sequence: 9
  givenname: R. W.
  surname: Mccallum
  fullname: Mccallum, R. W.
– sequence: 10
  givenname: H. P.
  surname: Parkman
  fullname: Parkman, H. P.
– sequence: 11
  givenname: E.
  surname: Soffer
  fullname: Soffer, E.
– sequence: 12
  givenname: G. E.
  surname: Wilding
  fullname: Wilding, G. E.
– sequence: 13
  givenname: J. R.
  surname: Semler
  fullname: Semler, J. R.
– sequence: 14
  givenname: S. S.c.
  surname: Rao
  fullname: Rao, S. S.c.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20465593$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNUstuFDEQtFAQecAvIN847caP8YwHCSQUAUEK5ALiaHk8XrYXjz3Y3iTLKZ_AN_IleHbDAifii1vucnVXVx-jAx-8RQhTMqflnK7mlNdixlrJ5oyUV0IFbeY3D9DRPnEwxYLMaMvEITpOaUUIqVlVP0KHjFS1EC0_Qt8_Q7TOpoTH85-3P4aQwUHeYKPHtHYWL0LEJrjgweActU-Qn-MxhjRak-HKluQw6ggpeHwNeYmj7iGM-tva4kHHrzYmDB6bZdxSmOBThlFnCP4xerjQLtknd_cJ-vTm9cez89nF5dt3Z68uZkYQ0cy6nndSC94tCJeVlm1nbadZkUJkT4SUtLY9NbxquO4Er1nds8bomkjRCS01P0Evd7zjuhtsb6wvQpwaI5QGNypoUP9mPCzVl3ClWEtp1bJC8OyOIIaiK2U1QDLWOe1tWCfViEo2kgr5f2QlW85YVRXk07-b2nfz25kCkDuAKcNO0S72EErUtARqpSav1eS1mpZAbZdA3fwRvP9qIG9HXuSBuw_Bix3BNTi7uXdh9eH95RTxX2roz-8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_XCS_0000000000000470
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_addr_2021_113853
crossref_primary_10_1097_PG9_0000000000000224
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2013_03_016
crossref_primary_10_14309_ctg_0000000000000084
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2023_11_037
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcmgh_2016_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_13329
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13107
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_autneu_2016_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13616
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2015_2444406
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2016_53
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12496
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000003429
crossref_primary_10_1177_2050640613510161
crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm15128
crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000000288
crossref_primary_10_1517_14712598_2011_577060
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jchirv_2021_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mpmed_2011_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00431_021_04295_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_codi_13810
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpg_2010_11_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13196
crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm16060
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14045
crossref_primary_10_1159_000511851
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2019_11_049
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2018_07_009
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0b013e32834d4f61
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41575_019_0222_y
crossref_primary_10_1002_cche_10208
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000001874
crossref_primary_10_1177_1179552217729343
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_012_0269_1
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41578_018_0070_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2023_04_030
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_011_1751_6
crossref_primary_10_1128_mSphere_00047_17
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0141183
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10071392
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpg_2012_12_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_014_3431_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14050
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2016_03_010
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2011_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13087
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2018_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrc_2011_12_002
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_113_134551
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2011_10_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_codi_12052
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001049
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_14438
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_addr_2021_113915
crossref_primary_10_4161_gmic_19579
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13878
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0143690
crossref_primary_10_1093_jaoacint_qsad051
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2982_2012_01973_x
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2012_239
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_12496
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogc_2021_05_016
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpgi_00294_2012
crossref_primary_10_1039_C6FO00406G
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_016_0489_x
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2013_07_039
crossref_primary_10_1097_MJT_0000000000000417
crossref_primary_10_14309_ctg_0000000000000633
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2982_2010_01612_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_013_0335_3
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2016_000110
crossref_primary_10_1080_19490976_2017_1412908
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2010_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2015_07_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jchromb_2011_08_002
crossref_primary_10_1088_2752_5724_ac48a3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_coph_2011_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13020
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13541
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13147
crossref_primary_10_1021_acsami_2c12380
crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2018_59_8_945
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14908
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics9040221
crossref_primary_10_17235_reed_2016_4389_2016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpg_2010_12_006
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2023_330542
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpgi_00168_2011
crossref_primary_10_1159_000515736
crossref_primary_10_3862_jcoloproctology_72_583
crossref_primary_10_1177_1756283X12443093
crossref_primary_10_1177_2050640616663439
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fpurol_2024_10_007
crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm20001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2021_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2016_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12461
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41575_019_0167_1
crossref_primary_10_1021_acsami_1c14905
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpgi_00178_2014
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0000000000000028
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14131
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jviscsurg_2021_12_004
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpgi_00087_2016
crossref_primary_10_12659_MSM_882724
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aprim_2016_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2012_247
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12077
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_2042_7158_2012_01477_x
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002124
crossref_primary_10_1586_17474124_2016_1098533
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semerg_2016_06_009
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0185496
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrdp_2017_95
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_parkreldis_2017_02_029
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13451
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2014_200
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001138
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13734
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14306
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12249
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12403
crossref_primary_10_1177_1756283X12437874
crossref_primary_10_1002_star_201500017
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17216
crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000000574
Cites_doi 10.1136/gut.10.10.842
10.1016/0016-5085(92)91092-I
10.1016/S0016-5085(79)80182-1
10.1056/NEJMra020995
10.1152/ajpgi.00136.2009
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01298.x
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01061.x
10.1023/A:1018893409596
10.1136/gut.11.2.91
10.1136/bmj.2.5805.104
10.1093/oso/9780198509844.001.0001
10.1007/BF02605761
10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.057
10.1016/0016-5085(87)90837-7
10.1111/j.1365-2036.1990.tb00469.x
10.1016/0016-5085(91)90466-X
10.1097/00005176-199008000-00010
10.1136/gut.33.6.818
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04114.x
10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.066
10.1016/j.cgh.2009.01.017
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50613_2.x
10.1097/00042737-199912000-00007
10.1152/ajpgi.1989.257.2.G284
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41845.x
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01363.x
10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.067
10.1136/gut.29.3.390
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01025.x
10.1136/gut.29.8.1035
10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.084
10.4065/70.2.113
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03195.x
10.1007/s10620-009-0899-9
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03564.x
10.1136/gut.34.3.402
10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00391-X
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7TK
5PM
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01517.x
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Neurosciences Abstracts
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Neurosciences Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
CrossRef
Neurosciences Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1365-2982
EndPage e233
ExternalDocumentID PMC2911492
20465593
10_1111_j_1365_2982_2010_01517_x
NMO1517
Genre article
Multicenter Study
Comparative Study
Clinical Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: R01-DK-54681
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DK054681
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OB
1OC
24P
29N
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DTERQ
DU5
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBS
EBX
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPT
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
Q~Q
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAMMB
AAYXX
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7TK
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5057-bd3b8a53bf0384a89beeba206208d058816ed1c3473ab53626d27ca6085b5a8a3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1350-1925
1365-2982
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:20:03 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 16:29:28 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 10:55:30 EDT 2025
Sat May 31 02:09:08 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:14 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 06 05:08:56 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:46:28 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5057-bd3b8a53bf0384a89beeba206208d058816ed1c3473ab53626d27ca6085b5a8a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79053
PMID 20465593
PQID 748932244
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2911492
proquest_miscellaneous_754878158
proquest_miscellaneous_748932244
pubmed_primary_20465593
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2982_2010_01517_x
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1365_2982_2010_01517_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2982_2010_01517_x_NMO1517
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 2010
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2010
  text: August 2010
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
– name: England
PublicationTitle Neurogastroenterology and motility
PublicationTitleAlternate Neurogastroenterol Motil
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References 1980; 239
1990; 11
2004; 127
1995; 70
2009; 21
1989; 257
1987; 92
1969; 10
1992; 103
2009; 297
1981; 24
2000; 95
1970; 11
2003
2004; 2
1992; 33
1998; 43
1979; 76
2009; 136
1972; 2
2004; 99
1993; 34
2003; 349
1991; 101
2009; 54
1988; 29
2005; 100
2010; 138
2007; 133
2008; 27
1999; 11
2009; 7
2008; 20
2008; 135
1990; 4
e_1_2_8_27_2
e_1_2_8_28_2
e_1_2_8_29_2
e_1_2_8_23_2
e_1_2_8_24_2
e_1_2_8_25_2
e_1_2_8_26_2
e_1_2_8_9_2
e_1_2_8_2_2
Saad RJ (e_1_2_8_32_2) 2009; 136
e_1_2_8_4_2
e_1_2_8_3_2
e_1_2_8_6_2
e_1_2_8_5_2
e_1_2_8_8_2
e_1_2_8_7_2
e_1_2_8_42_2
Pepe MS (e_1_2_8_20_2) 2003
e_1_2_8_41_2
e_1_2_8_21_2
e_1_2_8_22_2
e_1_2_8_43_2
e_1_2_8_40_2
e_1_2_8_16_2
e_1_2_8_39_2
e_1_2_8_17_2
e_1_2_8_38_2
Sarr MG (e_1_2_8_18_2) 1980; 239
e_1_2_8_19_2
e_1_2_8_12_2
e_1_2_8_35_2
e_1_2_8_13_2
e_1_2_8_34_2
e_1_2_8_14_2
Zarate N (e_1_2_8_31_2) 2009; 21
e_1_2_8_37_2
e_1_2_8_15_2
e_1_2_8_36_2
e_1_2_8_30_2
e_1_2_8_10_2
e_1_2_8_33_2
e_1_2_8_11_2
References_xml – volume: 21
  issue: Suppl. 1
  year: 2009
  article-title: Accurate localisation of a fall in pH within the ileo‐caecal region
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 10
  start-page: 842
  year: 1969
  end-page: 7
  article-title: A new method for studying gut transit times using radioopaque markers
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 92
  start-page: 40
  year: 1987
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 2
  start-page: 895
  year: 2004
  end-page: 904
  article-title: Effect of renzapride on transit in constipation‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 54
  start-page: 2167
  year: 2009
  end-page: 74
  article-title: Wireless capsule motility: comparison of the SmartPill((R)) GI Monitoring System with scintigraphy for measuring whole gut transit
  publication-title: Dig Dis Sci
– volume: 100
  start-page: 1605
  year: 2005
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Clinical utility of diagnostic tests for constipation in adults: a systematic review
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 135
  start-page: 1155
  year: 2008
  end-page: 62
  article-title: New insight into intestinal motor function via noninvasive endoluminal image analysis
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 34
  start-page: 402
  year: 1993
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Radioisotope determination of regional colonic transit in severe constipation: comparison with radio opaque markers
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 257
  start-page: G284
  year: 1989
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Human gastric emptying and colonic filling of solids characterized by a new method
  publication-title: Am J Physiol
– volume: 76
  start-page: 804
  year: 1979
  end-page: 13
  article-title: Sieving of solid food by the canine stomach and sieving after gastric surgery
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 100
  start-page: S5
  year: 2005
  end-page: 21
  article-title: Systematic review on the management of chronic constipation in North America
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenerol
– year: 2003
– volume: 103
  start-page: 36
  year: 1992
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Towards a relatively inexpensive, noninvasive, accurate test for colonic motility disorders
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1264
  year: 2009
  end-page: e119
  article-title: Intestinal motor activity, endoluminal motion and transit
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1379
  year: 1999
  end-page: 85
  article-title: Night‐time quiescence and morning activation in the human colon: effect on transit of dispersed and large single unit formulations
  publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 95
  start-page: 2338
  year: 2000
  end-page: 47
  article-title: Whole gut transit scintigraphy in the clinical evaluation of patient with upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 29
  start-page: 390
  year: 1988
  end-page: 406
  article-title: Motility of the ileocolonic junction
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 20
  start-page: 311
  year: 2008
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Gastric emptying of a non‐digestible solid: assessment with simultaneous SmartPill pH and pressure capsule, antroduodenal manometry, gastric emptying scintigraphy
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 7
  start-page: 537
  year: 2009
  end-page: 44
  article-title: Investigation of colonic and whole‐gut transit with wireless motility capsule and radiopaque markers in constipation
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 99
  start-page: 750
  year: 2004
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 70
  start-page: 113
  year: 1995
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Scintigraphy of the whole gut: clinical evaluation of transit disorders
  publication-title: Mayo Clin Proc
– volume: 95
  start-page: 2838
  year: 2000
  end-page: 47
  article-title: Whole gut transit scintigraphy in the clinical evaluation of patients with upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 33
  start-page: 818
  year: 1992
  end-page: 24
  article-title: Defecation frequency and timing, and stool form in the general population: a prospective study
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 27
  start-page: 186
  year: 2008
  end-page: 96
  article-title: Comparison of gastric emptying of a nondigestible capsule to a radio‐labelled meal in healthy and gastroparetic subjects
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 24
  start-page: 625
  year: 1981
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Segmental colonic transit time
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
– volume: 239
  start-page: G497
  year: 1980
  end-page: 503
  article-title: Patterns of movement of liquids and solids through canine jejunum
  publication-title: Am J Physiol
– volume: 127
  start-page: 49
  year: 2004
  end-page: 56
  article-title: Abnormal predefecatory colonic motor patterns define constipation in obstructed defecation
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 11
  start-page: 211
  year: 1990
  end-page: 4
  article-title: Measurement of gastrointestinal pH and regional transit times in normal children
  publication-title: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1035
  year: 1988
  end-page: 41
  article-title: Measurement of gastrointestinal pH profiles in normal ambulant human subjects
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 136
  issue: Suppl. 1
  year: 2009
  article-title: Reduced stool frequency does not predict colonic and whole gut transit in constipated patients
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 101
  start-page: 107
  year: 1991
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Scintigraphic measurement of regional gut transit in idiopathic constipation
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 138
  start-page: 89
  year: 2010
  end-page: 97
  article-title: Phenotypic variation of colonic motor functions in chronic constipation
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 133
  start-page: 761
  year: 2007
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Effect of 5 days linaclotide on transit and bowel function in females with constipation‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 43
  start-page: 702
  year: 1998
  end-page: 5
  article-title: Small intestinal transit time and intraluminal pH in ileocecal resected patients with Crohn’s disease
  publication-title: Dig Dis Sci
– volume: 21
  start-page: 838
  year: 2009
  end-page: 57
  article-title: Colonic movements in healthy subjects as monitored by a magnet tracking system
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 4
  start-page: 247
  year: 1990
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Gastrointestinal pH and transit times in healthy subjects with ileostomy
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 2
  start-page: 104
  year: 1972
  end-page: 6
  article-title: pH profile of gut as measured by radiotelemetry capsule
  publication-title: Br Med J
– volume: 20
  start-page: 197
  year: 2008
  end-page: 205
  article-title: Gastrointestinal transit abnormalities are frequently detected in patients with unexplained GI symptoms at a tertiary centre
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 297
  start-page: G1107
  year: 2009
  end-page: 14
  article-title: Heightened coln motor activity measured by a wireless capsule in patients with constipation: relation to colon transit and IBS
  publication-title: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
– volume: 349
  start-page: 1360
  year: 2003
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Chronic constipation
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 11
  start-page: 91
  year: 1970
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Propulsion (mass movements) in the human colon and its relationship to meals and somatic activity
  publication-title: Gut
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_2
  doi: 10.1136/gut.10.10.842
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_2
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91092-I
– volume: 239
  start-page: G497
  year: 1980
  ident: e_1_2_8_18_2
  article-title: Patterns of movement of liquids and solids through canine jejunum
  publication-title: Am J Physiol
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_2
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(79)80182-1
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_2
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMra020995
– ident: e_1_2_8_36_2
  doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00136.2009
– ident: e_1_2_8_41_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01298.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01061.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_2
  doi: 10.1023/A:1018893409596
– volume: 136
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_8_32_2
  article-title: Reduced stool frequency does not predict colonic and whole gut transit in constipated patients
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_2
  doi: 10.1136/gut.11.2.91
– ident: e_1_2_8_29_2
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5805.104
– volume-title: The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_8_20_2
  doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198509844.001.0001
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_2
  doi: 10.1007/BF02605761
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_2
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.057
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_2
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90837-7
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1990.tb00469.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_2
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90466-X
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_2
  doi: 10.1097/00005176-199008000-00010
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_2
  doi: 10.1136/gut.33.6.818
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04114.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_39_2
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.066
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.01.017
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50613_2.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_2
  doi: 10.1097/00042737-199912000-00007
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_2
  doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1989.257.2.G284
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41845.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_43_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01363.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_2
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.067
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_2
  doi: 10.1136/gut.29.3.390
– ident: e_1_2_8_40_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01025.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_2
  doi: 10.1136/gut.29.8.1035
– ident: e_1_2_8_42_2
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.084
– volume: 21
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_8_31_2
  article-title: Accurate localisation of a fall in pH within the ileo‐caecal region
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– ident: e_1_2_8_37_2
  doi: 10.4065/70.2.113
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03195.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_38_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03195.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_2
  doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0899-9
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03564.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_2
  doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.402
– ident: e_1_2_8_33_2
  doi: 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00391-X
SSID ssj0006246
Score 2.372868
Snippet Background  Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited...
Background Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited...
Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information. We...
Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited...
AbstractBackground Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited...
Colon transit (CT) measurements are used in the management of significant constipation. The radiopaque marker (ROM) method provides limited information. We...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 874
SubjectTerms Adult
Capsule Endoscopy - methods
Capsules
Chronic Disease
Colon - physiopathology
colonic transit time
Constipation - diagnosis
Constipation - physiopathology
Contrast Media - metabolism
correlation
Female
Gastrointestinal Transit - physiology
Humans
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Male
Middle Aged
negative agreement
positive agreement
radiopaque markers
Reproducibility of Results
wireless motility capsule
Title Wireless pH‐motility capsule for colonic transit: prospective comparison with radiopaque markers in chronic constipation
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2982.2010.01517.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20465593
https://www.proquest.com/docview/748932244
https://www.proquest.com/docview/754878158
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2911492
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYhh5BLm0cfm6ZFh9CbF9uybDm3EBqWwqZQEshN6GVqsnHCrhfanPoT-hvzSzojeZ04KSWU3gyWdpnxjOcb-dMnQg6cKm1moclBdZsI6jFcMZNENoNi4HiVsgI3OE9P88l59vmCX3T8J9wLE_Qh-gU3zAz_vsYEV3oxTHLP0CpF2jG0oHgVY8STeAPx0dd7Jak8DRuNGI8jADV8SOr54w8NK9UT-PmURfkQ3frydPKSXK4MC6yUy_Gy1WNz-0jz8f9YvkVedCiWHoWw2yZrrtkhu0cNdPBXP-hH6nmlfsF-h2xMu8_3u-QWubYzeLfSm8ndz1_IA8QugBoFvfrMUQDQFFW0m9rQFoto3R5SMGm1HZSa_tREigvIdK5sDV0_uIxeIc9ovqB1Q00Q_IXRyIQIlPFX5Pzk09nxJOoOf4gM9kyRtkwLxZmuYiYyJUrtnFYpPMhY2JgLkeTOJoZlBVOao6iOTQujcoCQmiuh2Guy3lw37i2hONaW3FYIZlgVq7LStkKoZ6tE5dWIFKsHLU2njI4HdMzkgw4JPC7R4xI9Lr3H5fcRSfqZN0Ed5Blz6CqWJKQyfp9RjbteLqQXAgJIlf1lCDaYIuFiRN6E6Ov_N41RCq9kYM0gLvsBKCQ-vNPU37ygeAoVLyvTEcl92D3bFHk6_YJXe_868R3ZDGwMJFTuk_V2vnTvAeS1-oNP39-s9EaA
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELVQkYALlJaPhQI-IG5ZJXGcONwq1GqB7iKhVurN8lfUiG1abbNS2xM_gd_IL2HGzqYNRahC3CKtnZUnM5k3zvMbQt46VdrMQpGD6jYR5GO4YiaJbAbJwPEqZQUecJ7O8slB9umQH3btgPAsTNCH6DfcMDL8-xoDHDekh1HuKVqlSDuKFmSvYgyA8i42-Pb11dcrLak8DUeNGI8jgDV8SOv5452GueoGAL3Jo7yOb32C2n1E5qulBV7Kt_Gy1WNz-Zvq439a-zp52AFZuh087zG545oNsrndQBF_fEHfUU8t9Xv2G-TetPuCv0kukW47h9crPZ38_P4DqYBYCFCjoFyfOwoYmqKQdlMb2mIerdv3FNa0OhFKTd84keIeMl0oW0PhDzajx0g1WpzRuqEmaP7CaCRDBNb4E3Kwu7P_YRJ1_R8ig2VTpC3TQnGmq5iJTIlSO6dVCk8yFjbmQiS5s4lhWcGU5qirY9PCqBxQpOZKKPaUrDUnjXtOKI61JbcV4hlWxaqstK0Q7dkqUXk1IsXqSUvTiaNjj465vFYkgcUlWlyixaW3uDwfkaSfeRoEQm4xh66cSUI04yca1biT5Zn0WkCAqrK_DMEaUyRcjMiz4H79_6YxquGVDFYzcMx-AGqJD39p6iOvKZ5C0svKdERy73e3XoqcTb_g1Yt_nfiG3J_sT_fk3sfZ55fkQSBnIL9yi6y1i6V7BZiv1a99LP8C9nBKmw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQkSouPFoey9MHxC2rJI4Th1tFWS2PXRCiUm-Wn2rUbbraZiXoiZ_Ab-SXMONkQ0MRqhC3SLETeTyT-cb5_JmQ506VNrNQ5KC6TQT5GK6YSSKbQTJw3KeswA3Os3k-PcjeHvLDjv-Ee2FafYh-wQ0jI3yvMcCX1g-DPDC0SpF2DC1IXsUY8OT1LI8Fevj-p19SUnna7jRiPI4A1fAhq-ePTxqmqkv48zKN8iK8Dflpcoscb0bW0lKOx-tGj835b6KP_2fot8nNDsbSvdbv7pBrrt4hu3s1lPAnX-kLGoilYcV-h2zPuv_3u-QcybYL-LjS5fTHt-9IBMQygBoFxfrCUUDQFGW068rQBrNo1bykMKTNflBq-mMTKa4g05WyFZT9YDJ6gkSj1RmtampaxV9ojVSIljN-lxxMXn9-NY260x8ig0VTpC3TQnGmfcxEpkSpndMqhYmMhY25EEnubGJYVjClOarq2LQwCqaea66EYvfIVn1auweEYltbcusRzTAfq9Jr6xHrWZ-o3I9IsZloaTppdDyhYyEvlEhgcYkWl2hxGSwuv4xI0vdctvIgV-hDN74kIZbxB42q3en6TAYlIMBU2V-aYIUpEi5G5H7rff170xi18EoGoxn4Zd8AlcSHd-rqKCiKp5DysjIdkTy43ZWHIuezD3j18F87PiPbH_cn8v2b-btH5EbLzEBy5WOy1azW7gkAvkY_DZH8E_ZvSVM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wireless+pH-motility+capsule+for+colonic+transit%3A+prospective+comparison+with+radiopaque+markers+in+chronic+constipation&rft.jtitle=Neurogastroenterology+and+motility&rft.au=Camilleri%2C+M&rft.au=thorne%2C+nk&rft.au=Ringel%2C+Y&rft.au=Hasler%2C+WL&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.issn=1350-1925&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=874&rft.epage=e233&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2982.2010.01517.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1350-1925&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1350-1925&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1350-1925&client=summon