A health-conformant reading of the GDPR’s right not to be subject to automated decision-making
Abstract As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to...
Saved in:
Published in | Medical law review Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 373 - 391 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press
01.08.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Abstract
As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients’ rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right ‘not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing’ in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)—although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients’ rights in the EU. |
---|---|
AbstractList | As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients' rights. A specific patients' right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients' rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right 'not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing' in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)-although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients' rights in the EU.As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients' rights. A specific patients' right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients' rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right 'not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing' in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)-although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients' rights in the EU. As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients’ rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right ‘not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing’ in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)—although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients’ rights in the EU. Abstract As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients’ rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right ‘not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing’ in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)—although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients’ rights in the EU. As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients’ rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right ‘not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing’ in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)—although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients’ rights in the EU. |
Author | van Kolfschooten, Hannah B |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hannah B orcidid: 0000-0002-3342-0285 surname: van Kolfschooten fullname: van Kolfschooten, Hannah B email: h.b.vankolfschooten@uva.nl |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39135367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFks1u1TAQhSNURH9gyxJ5CYu0duw48QpVhRakSiBU2JqJM7lxSexb26Hqjtfg9XgScptbKEiIje3xzPnGmuP9bMd5h1n2lNFDRhU_GrEd4PqouwakhXqQ7TEhRc4rRXfunXez_RgvKaWS1-xRtssV4yWX1V72-Zj0CEPqc-Nd58MILpGA0Fq3Ir4jqUdy9ur9hx_fvkcS7KpPxPlEkicNkjg1l2huI5iSHyFhS1o0Nlrv8hG-zJDH2cMOhohPtvtB9vH09cXJm_z83dnbk-Pz3JRUpFwKxlkBdWkqNAzbThR1iwwMVMjqVjZYm6ZSzWYVtC0RZFmYBktR113XAj_IXi7c9dTMQzHoUoBBr4MdIdxoD1b_mXG21yv_VTPGRaW4mgnPt4TgryaMSY82GhwGcOinqDlVBZdlzcq59Nn9Zr-63M11LhBLgQk-xoCdNjZBmscy97aDZlRv7NOLfXpr3yw7_Et2R_6n4NMiCKNNGlY2rpOOCMH02t76OV_7sNKttxsG50z-TlwUtBBU0YpuvkapCloxUchCyRn8YgH7af2_R_wEIxDN5g |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s44206_025_00159_w crossref_primary_10_3389_frai_2024_1400732 crossref_primary_10_7180_kmj_24_140 crossref_primary_10_3390_ph18010047 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. 2024 The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. 2024 – notice: The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. |
DBID | TOX AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1093/medlaw/fwae029 |
DatabaseName | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: TOX name: Oxford Journals Open Access Collection url: https://academic.oup.com/journals/ sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Law |
EISSN | 1464-3790 |
EndPage | 391 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC11347939 39135367 10_1093_medlaw_fwae029 10.3316/informit.T2024090700006592071426296 10.1093/medlaw/fwae029 |
Genre | Original Articles Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | EUROPEAN UNION |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: EUROPEAN UNION |
GroupedDBID | --- -E4 .2P .CB .I3 .ZR 0R~ 0ZK 18M 1TH 29M 2WC 3EH 4.4 482 48X 5.J 53G 5GY 5VS 5WA 5WD 6DY 70D 8U8 AABZA AACZT AAFXQ AAJKP AAJQQ AAMDB AAMVS AAMZS AAOGV AAPGJ AAPNW AAPQZ AAPXW AAQJL AARHZ AASKQ AAUAY AAUOS AAUQX AAVAP AAWDT AAXEK ABCLM ABCOO ABDBF ABDFA ABEJV ABEUO ABGNP ABGTT ABIXL ABJNI ABKDP ABKEB ABLUF ABNGD ABNHQ ABNKS ABPQP ABPTD ABQLI ABQTQ ABSMQ ABTAH ABVAB ABVGC ABWST ABXVV ABYLZ ABZBJ ACBMB ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACOZV ACPQN ACUFI ACUHS ACUKT ACUTJ ACUTO ACVCV ACVHY ACZBC ADBBV ADBKU ADEYI ADEYR ADEZT ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIMT ADIPN ADLOL ADMTO ADNBA ADOCK ADQBN ADQIT ADRTK ADUOI ADVEK ADYVW ADZXQ AEGPL AEGXH AEHKA AEHUL AEJOX AEKPW AEKSI AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AETBB AETBJ AEWNT AFCKW AFFQV AFFZL AFHLB AFIYH AFOFC AFSHK AFTFX AFVIK AFYAG AGINJ AGKEF AGKRT AGMDO AGPAQ AGQXC AGQZG AGSYK AGYMI AHCLI AHMBA AHMMS AHXPO AIAGR AIJHB AIMRU AJDVS AJEEA AJNCP AKWXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC ALXQX AMHCJ APIBT APJGH APWMN AQDSO AQGRX AQKUS ASPBG ATGXG ATTQO AVNTJ AVWKF AXUDD AYLYT AZFZN BAWVD BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BHONS BHZBG BPQBT BSEYZ BTRTY BVRKM BWUDY BZKNY C45 CAG CDBKE CNZYI COF CS3 CZ4 DAKXR DILTD D~K EBD EBS EEOPI EE~ EIHJH EJD EMOBN ESX ETYVG F5P F9B FALNP FEDTE FLUFQ FOEOM FOTVD FQBLK FTKQU GAUVT GCT GJXCC H13 H5~ HAR HCSNT HISYW HOCAJ HVGLF HW0 HZ~ IOX J21 JXSIZ KAQDR KBUDW KOP KSI KSN LAAQE LBA LDNZT LFVXT LKZDS LNAJO LXB LXL LXN LXO LXY M-Z M49 MAZMC MBLQV MJWOD N9A NANYC NGC NOMLY NOYVH NPJNY NTWIH NU- NVLIB O0~ O5R O5S O9- OAWHX OBFPC OCZFY ODMLO OJQWA OJZSN OPAEJ OVD OWPYF OXVUA O~Y P2P PAFKI PB- PEELM PLIXB PQQKQ Q1. Q5Y QBD R44 RD5 RHO RIG RNI ROL ROX ROZ RUSNO RW1 RXO RZF RZO SV3 TAE TEORI TJJ TJL TJX TLA TMA TOX TWJ UFL ULB UXL UXR WE1 X6Y X7H XFL XPU YADRA YAJVU YAYTL YKOAZ YXANX ZKX ZRR ZY4 ZYG ~91 ~D7 ~SN ABJFX ADJQC ADRIX AFXEN LXU AAYXX AGORE AHGBF AJBYB CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-641312a85c7ec1edf428de1aca7e18d6be8cb79b8cb740d5ea652cbe5488ffda3 |
IEDL.DBID | TOX |
ISSN | 1464-3790 0967-0742 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:32:08 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:53:32 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:57:13 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:47:37 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:40 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 24 09:58:04 EDT 2024 Wed Apr 02 07:03:30 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | automated decision-making Artificial Intelligence patients rights EU law GDPR healthcare |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c504t-641312a85c7ec1edf428de1aca7e18d6be8cb79b8cb740d5ea652cbe5488ffda3 |
Notes | Medical Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, Sep 2024, 373-391 Informit, Melbourne (Vic) ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-3342-0285 |
OpenAccessLink | https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwae029 |
PMID | 39135367 |
PQID | 3092365815 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 19 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_39135367 rmit_agispt_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_informit_T2024090700006592071426296 crossref_primary_10_1093_medlaw_fwae029 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11347939 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_medlaw_fwae029 oup_primary_10_1093_medlaw_fwae029 proquest_miscellaneous_3092365815 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-Aug-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2024 text: 2024-Aug-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United Kingdom |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United Kingdom – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Medical law review |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Med Law Rev |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press |
SSID | ssj0006381 |
Score | 2.3334994 |
Snippet | Abstract
As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to... As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref rmit oup |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 373 |
SubjectTerms | Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence - legislation & jurisprudence Civil rights Clinical Decision-Making Computer Security - legislation & jurisprudence Decision Making European Union Humans Medical care Original Patient Rights - legislation & jurisprudence Patients Privacy, Right of |
Title | A health-conformant reading of the GDPR’s right not to be subject to automated decision-making |
URI | http://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.T2024090700006592071426296 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39135367 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3092365815 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11347939 |
Volume | 32 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELagSIgLastrgVYGIXGyGj_iJMctZakQpQhtpb2ZcWJDpZJUTVZ75W_07_FLGMdp6PIQXCIlHjuPsT0zmZlvCHnh8gIbpGMpJJ4pyBNmvQImwYMAayXvDcWj9_rwRL1dpIsBLLr9gwu_kHsoFc5gtedX4BIRUvVQAgeU_PnxYtxzcRbxEZLx1y5rImctje2aNvl7UOS1jPpe2Mw2yd1BS6TTyNYtcsPV2-TmO1htk9tHgzf8Hvk0pTGNkaFRG8P_O3oRo-Jp4ynqdvTNwYeP379dtrS3wmnddLRrqHW0XdrwCyacwbJrUHF1Fa2Gijvsa1-k6j45mb2evzpkQ8UEVqaJ6phGkcQF5GmZuZK7yqNxUTkOJWSO55W2Li9tVthwVEmVOtCpKK1DsyX3vgL5gGzUTe0eEapSoTz2zDRYxb0KdodPyuC1w2UMYkLY1Uc15QAnHqpanJno1pYmMsEMTJiQlyP9eQTS-Cvlc-TRP4meXbHQ4IIIXg6oXbNsjUxQZ0W9iqcT8jCydBxLFqHMh84mJF9j9kgQwLbXW-rTLz3oNo85t3jj4zAvDHw-bc87E_cjE1Fu8TJOXIMTODy1lFz_bJiLgCZX4A7bq32FCJljQotCP_6f931C7oQBYujhU7LRXSzdDqpDnd0lt6b7B_uz3X5F_AA93g-T |
linkProvider | Oxford University Press |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+health-conformant+reading+of+the+GDPR%E2%80%99s+right+not+to+be+subject+to+automated+decision-making&rft.jtitle=Medical+law+review&rft.au=van+Kolfschooten%2C+Hannah+B&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.issn=1464-3790&rft.eissn=1464-3790&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=391&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fmedlaw%2Ffwae029&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1093_medlaw_fwae029 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1464-3790&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1464-3790&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1464-3790&client=summon |