A health-conformant reading of the GDPR’s right not to be subject to automated decision-making

Abstract As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical law review Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 373 - 391
Main Author van Kolfschooten, Hannah B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United Kingdom Oxford University Press 01.08.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Abstract As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients’ rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right ‘not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing’ in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)—although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients’ rights in the EU.
AbstractList As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients' rights. A specific patients' right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients' rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right 'not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing' in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)-although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients' rights in the EU.As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients' rights. A specific patients' right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients' rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right 'not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing' in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)-although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients' rights in the EU.
As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients’ rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right ‘not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing’ in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)—although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients’ rights in the EU.
Abstract As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients’ rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right ‘not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing’ in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)—although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients’ rights in the EU.
As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients’ rights. A specific patients’ right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients’ rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right ‘not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing’ in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)—although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients’ rights in the EU.
Author van Kolfschooten, Hannah B
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hannah B
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3342-0285
  surname: van Kolfschooten
  fullname: van Kolfschooten, Hannah B
  email: h.b.vankolfschooten@uva.nl
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39135367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFks1u1TAQhSNURH9gyxJ5CYu0duw48QpVhRakSiBU2JqJM7lxSexb26Hqjtfg9XgScptbKEiIje3xzPnGmuP9bMd5h1n2lNFDRhU_GrEd4PqouwakhXqQ7TEhRc4rRXfunXez_RgvKaWS1-xRtssV4yWX1V72-Zj0CEPqc-Nd58MILpGA0Fq3Ir4jqUdy9ur9hx_fvkcS7KpPxPlEkicNkjg1l2huI5iSHyFhS1o0Nlrv8hG-zJDH2cMOhohPtvtB9vH09cXJm_z83dnbk-Pz3JRUpFwKxlkBdWkqNAzbThR1iwwMVMjqVjZYm6ZSzWYVtC0RZFmYBktR113XAj_IXi7c9dTMQzHoUoBBr4MdIdxoD1b_mXG21yv_VTPGRaW4mgnPt4TgryaMSY82GhwGcOinqDlVBZdlzcq59Nn9Zr-63M11LhBLgQk-xoCdNjZBmscy97aDZlRv7NOLfXpr3yw7_Et2R_6n4NMiCKNNGlY2rpOOCMH02t76OV_7sNKttxsG50z-TlwUtBBU0YpuvkapCloxUchCyRn8YgH7af2_R_wEIxDN5g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s44206_025_00159_w
crossref_primary_10_3389_frai_2024_1400732
crossref_primary_10_7180_kmj_24_140
crossref_primary_10_3390_ph18010047
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. 2024
The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. 2024
– notice: The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
DBID TOX
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1093/medlaw/fwae029
DatabaseName Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef


MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: TOX
  name: Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
  url: https://academic.oup.com/journals/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Law
EISSN 1464-3790
EndPage 391
ExternalDocumentID PMC11347939
39135367
10_1093_medlaw_fwae029
10.3316/informit.T2024090700006592071426296
10.1093/medlaw/fwae029
Genre Original Articles
Journal Article
GeographicLocations EUROPEAN UNION
GeographicLocations_xml – name: EUROPEAN UNION
GroupedDBID ---
-E4
.2P
.CB
.I3
.ZR
0R~
0ZK
18M
1TH
29M
2WC
3EH
4.4
482
48X
5.J
53G
5GY
5VS
5WA
5WD
6DY
70D
8U8
AABZA
AACZT
AAFXQ
AAJKP
AAJQQ
AAMDB
AAMVS
AAMZS
AAOGV
AAPGJ
AAPNW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AAQJL
AARHZ
AASKQ
AAUAY
AAUOS
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWDT
AAXEK
ABCLM
ABCOO
ABDBF
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABEUO
ABGNP
ABGTT
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABKDP
ABKEB
ABLUF
ABNGD
ABNHQ
ABNKS
ABPQP
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABQTQ
ABSMQ
ABTAH
ABVAB
ABVGC
ABWST
ABXVV
ABYLZ
ABZBJ
ACBMB
ACFRR
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACOZV
ACPQN
ACUFI
ACUHS
ACUKT
ACUTJ
ACUTO
ACVCV
ACVHY
ACZBC
ADBBV
ADBKU
ADEYI
ADEYR
ADEZT
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIMT
ADIPN
ADLOL
ADMTO
ADNBA
ADOCK
ADQBN
ADQIT
ADRTK
ADUOI
ADVEK
ADYVW
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEGXH
AEHKA
AEHUL
AEJOX
AEKPW
AEKSI
AEMDU
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBB
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFCKW
AFFQV
AFFZL
AFHLB
AFIYH
AFOFC
AFSHK
AFTFX
AFVIK
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKEF
AGKRT
AGMDO
AGPAQ
AGQXC
AGQZG
AGSYK
AGYMI
AHCLI
AHMBA
AHMMS
AHXPO
AIAGR
AIJHB
AIMRU
AJDVS
AJEEA
AJNCP
AKWXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
ALXQX
AMHCJ
APIBT
APJGH
APWMN
AQDSO
AQGRX
AQKUS
ASPBG
ATGXG
ATTQO
AVNTJ
AVWKF
AXUDD
AYLYT
AZFZN
BAWVD
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BHONS
BHZBG
BPQBT
BSEYZ
BTRTY
BVRKM
BWUDY
BZKNY
C45
CAG
CDBKE
CNZYI
COF
CS3
CZ4
DAKXR
DILTD
D~K
EBD
EBS
EEOPI
EE~
EIHJH
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
ETYVG
F5P
F9B
FALNP
FEDTE
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
FTKQU
GAUVT
GCT
GJXCC
H13
H5~
HAR
HCSNT
HISYW
HOCAJ
HVGLF
HW0
HZ~
IOX
J21
JXSIZ
KAQDR
KBUDW
KOP
KSI
KSN
LAAQE
LBA
LDNZT
LFVXT
LKZDS
LNAJO
LXB
LXL
LXN
LXO
LXY
M-Z
M49
MAZMC
MBLQV
MJWOD
N9A
NANYC
NGC
NOMLY
NOYVH
NPJNY
NTWIH
NU-
NVLIB
O0~
O5R
O5S
O9-
OAWHX
OBFPC
OCZFY
ODMLO
OJQWA
OJZSN
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
OXVUA
O~Y
P2P
PAFKI
PB-
PEELM
PLIXB
PQQKQ
Q1.
Q5Y
QBD
R44
RD5
RHO
RIG
RNI
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
RZF
RZO
SV3
TAE
TEORI
TJJ
TJL
TJX
TLA
TMA
TOX
TWJ
UFL
ULB
UXL
UXR
WE1
X6Y
X7H
XFL
XPU
YADRA
YAJVU
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YXANX
ZKX
ZRR
ZY4
ZYG
~91
~D7
~SN
ABJFX
ADJQC
ADRIX
AFXEN
LXU
AAYXX
AGORE
AHGBF
AJBYB
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-641312a85c7ec1edf428de1aca7e18d6be8cb79b8cb740d5ea652cbe5488ffda3
IEDL.DBID TOX
ISSN 1464-3790
0967-0742
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:32:08 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:53:32 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:57:13 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:47:37 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:40 EDT 2025
Thu Oct 24 09:58:04 EDT 2024
Wed Apr 02 07:03:30 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords automated decision-making
Artificial Intelligence
patients
rights
EU law
GDPR
healthcare
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c504t-641312a85c7ec1edf428de1aca7e18d6be8cb79b8cb740d5ea652cbe5488ffda3
Notes Medical Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, Sep 2024, 373-391
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-3342-0285
OpenAccessLink https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwae029
PMID 39135367
PQID 3092365815
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 19
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_39135367
rmit_agispt_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_informit_T2024090700006592071426296
crossref_primary_10_1093_medlaw_fwae029
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11347939
crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_medlaw_fwae029
oup_primary_10_1093_medlaw_fwae029
proquest_miscellaneous_3092365815
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-Aug-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-Aug-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United Kingdom
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United Kingdom
– name: England
PublicationTitle Medical law review
PublicationTitleAlternate Med Law Rev
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
SSID ssj0006381
Score 2.3334994
Snippet Abstract As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to...
As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
rmit
oup
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 373
SubjectTerms Artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence - legislation & jurisprudence
Civil rights
Clinical Decision-Making
Computer Security - legislation & jurisprudence
Decision Making
European Union
Humans
Medical care
Original
Patient Rights - legislation & jurisprudence
Patients
Privacy, Right of
Title A health-conformant reading of the GDPR’s right not to be subject to automated decision-making
URI http://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.T2024090700006592071426296
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39135367
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3092365815
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11347939
Volume 32
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELagSIgLastrgVYGIXGyGj_iJMctZakQpQhtpb2ZcWJDpZJUTVZ75W_07_FLGMdp6PIQXCIlHjuPsT0zmZlvCHnh8gIbpGMpJJ4pyBNmvQImwYMAayXvDcWj9_rwRL1dpIsBLLr9gwu_kHsoFc5gtedX4BIRUvVQAgeU_PnxYtxzcRbxEZLx1y5rImctje2aNvl7UOS1jPpe2Mw2yd1BS6TTyNYtcsPV2-TmO1htk9tHgzf8Hvk0pTGNkaFRG8P_O3oRo-Jp4ynqdvTNwYeP379dtrS3wmnddLRrqHW0XdrwCyacwbJrUHF1Fa2Gijvsa1-k6j45mb2evzpkQ8UEVqaJ6phGkcQF5GmZuZK7yqNxUTkOJWSO55W2Li9tVthwVEmVOtCpKK1DsyX3vgL5gGzUTe0eEapSoTz2zDRYxb0KdodPyuC1w2UMYkLY1Uc15QAnHqpanJno1pYmMsEMTJiQlyP9eQTS-Cvlc-TRP4meXbHQ4IIIXg6oXbNsjUxQZ0W9iqcT8jCydBxLFqHMh84mJF9j9kgQwLbXW-rTLz3oNo85t3jj4zAvDHw-bc87E_cjE1Fu8TJOXIMTODy1lFz_bJiLgCZX4A7bq32FCJljQotCP_6f931C7oQBYujhU7LRXSzdDqpDnd0lt6b7B_uz3X5F_AA93g-T
linkProvider Oxford University Press
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+health-conformant+reading+of+the+GDPR%E2%80%99s+right+not+to+be+subject+to+automated+decision-making&rft.jtitle=Medical+law+review&rft.au=van+Kolfschooten%2C+Hannah+B&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.issn=1464-3790&rft.eissn=1464-3790&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=391&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fmedlaw%2Ffwae029&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1093_medlaw_fwae029
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1464-3790&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1464-3790&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1464-3790&client=summon