Recovery of Agricultural Odors and Odorous Compounds from Polyvinyl Fluoride Film Bags
Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human...
Saved in:
| Published in | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 10; no. 9; pp. 8536 - 8552 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Switzerland
MDPI AG
01.09.2010
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 µg m−3) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 µg m−3), propionic (15,800 µg m−3), isobutyric (1,686 µg m−3), butyric (1,049 µg m−3), isovaleric (1,236 µg m−3), valeric (643 µg m−3), and hexanoic (2,158 µg m−3) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 µg m−3) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 µg m−3), propionic (15,800 µg m−3), isobutyric (1,686 µg m−3), butyric (1,049 µg m−3), isovaleric (1,236 µg m−3), valeric (643 µg m−3), and hexanoic (2,158 µg m−3) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 μg m(-3)) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 μg m(-3)), propionic (15,800 μg m(-3)), isobutyric (1,686 μg m(-3)), butyric (1,049 μg m(-3)), isovaleric (1,236 μg m(-3)), valeric (643 μg m(-3)), and hexanoic (2,158 μg m(-3)) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 µg m-3) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 µg m-3), propionic (15,800 µg m-3), isobutyric (1,686 µg m-3), butyric (1,049 µg m-3), isovaleric (1,236 µg m-3), valeric (643 µg m-3), and hexanoic (2,158 µg m-3) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 µg m−3) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 µg m−3), propionic (15,800 µg m−3), isobutyric (1,686 µg m−3), butyric (1,049 µg m−3), isovaleric (1,236 µg m−3), valeric (643 µg m−3), and hexanoic (2,158 µg m−3) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 μg m(-3)) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 μg m(-3)), propionic (15,800 μg m(-3)), isobutyric (1,686 μg m(-3)), butyric (1,049 μg m(-3)), isovaleric (1,236 μg m(-3)), valeric (643 μg m(-3)), and hexanoic (2,158 μg m(-3)) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry.Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 μg m(-3)) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 μg m(-3)), propionic (15,800 μg m(-3)), isobutyric (1,686 μg m(-3)), butyric (1,049 μg m(-3)), isovaleric (1,236 μg m(-3)), valeric (643 μg m(-3)), and hexanoic (2,158 μg m(-3)) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 µg m−3) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 µg m−3), propionic (15,800 µg m−3), isobutyric (1,686 µg m−3), butyric (1,049 µg m−3), isovaleric (1,236 µg m−3), valeric (643 µg m−3), and hexanoic (2,158 µg m−3) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 μg m −3 ) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 μg m −3 ), propionic (15,800 μg m −3 ), isobutyric (1,686 μg m −3 ), butyric (1,049 μg m −3 ), isovaleric (1,236 μg m −3 ), valeric (643 μg m −3 ), and hexanoic (2,158 μg m −3 ) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. |
| Author | Koziel, Jacek A. Parker, David B. Perschbacher-Buser, Zena L. Cole, N. Andy |
| AuthorAffiliation | 1 USDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, 68933 USA 2 Adams State College, Alamosa, CO, 81102 USA; E-Mail: zenabuser@adams.edu 4 Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011 USA; E-Mail: koziel@iastate.edu 3 USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX, 79012 USA; E-Mail: andy.cole@ars.usda.gov |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 4 Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011 USA; E-Mail: koziel@iastate.edu – name: 2 Adams State College, Alamosa, CO, 81102 USA; E-Mail: zenabuser@adams.edu – name: 3 USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX, 79012 USA; E-Mail: andy.cole@ars.usda.gov – name: 1 USDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, 68933 USA |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: David B. surname: Parker fullname: Parker, David B. – sequence: 2 givenname: Zena L. surname: Perschbacher-Buser fullname: Perschbacher-Buser, Zena L. – sequence: 3 givenname: N. Andy surname: Cole fullname: Cole, N. Andy – sequence: 4 givenname: Jacek A. orcidid: 0000-0002-2387-0354 surname: Koziel fullname: Koziel, Jacek A. |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22163671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFkl1rFDEUhoNU7Jc3_gAJeCEIa_MxmZncCO3iaqHQItXbkElO1iyZyZrMLOy_N9uttS2CVzkkz3lzznvOMToY4gAIvaHkI-eSnGVKiCSt4PULdEQrVs1axsjBo_gQHee8IoRxzttX6JAxWvO6oUfoxzcwcQNpi6PD58vkzRTGKemAr21MGevB3kVxynge-3WcBpuxS7HHNzFsN37YBrwIU0zeAl740OMLvcyn6KXTIcPr-_MEfV98vp1_nV1df7mcn1_NjCB8nFVWSGhcTQmYhmvLpbXMAKtbDhps6aljndHCMOBOOFnxTjaspV3FBQDp-Am63OvaqFdqnXyv01ZF7dXdRUxLpdPoTQBloZglma6I5hW1TrvOMkFA1o440kHR-rTXWk9dD9bAMBYfnog-fRn8T7WMG8UZp6yiReD9vUCKvybIo-p9NhCCHqD4pySVUrSSk_-STcNYLYmoCvnuGbmKUxqKp4oK3oiG1Gz389vHpT_U_GfOBfiwB0yKOSdwDwglardE6u8SFZg8g40f9ejjrm0f_pXyG-rLyOE |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_s17081859 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_buildenv_2020_106668 crossref_primary_10_3390_s130100938 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_148862 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2012_06_080 crossref_primary_10_1080_10962247_2015_1100142 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_5665921 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_06_272 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_214190 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cej_2015_04_031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2012_01_001 crossref_primary_10_1021_ac401385m crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2017_07_0289 crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_9690704 crossref_primary_10_1080_10473289_2011_646050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2016_04_009 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos10040170 crossref_primary_10_4236_jep_2014_511096 crossref_primary_10_1088_1752_7163_ad6a31 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2015_10_0511 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_015_2495_2 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2018_00033 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2013_05_0185 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2016_09_0333 crossref_primary_10_1039_c2em30722g crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2011_04_081 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biosystemseng_2018_12_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biosystemseng_2020_10_005 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_17_4945_2017 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2010_0522 crossref_primary_10_1100_2011_529532 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2016_03_060 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biosystemseng_2019_11_007 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1093/oso/9780199631469.001.0001 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.017 10.2134/jeq2005.0035 10.2134/jeq2003.1173 10.1039/b008873k 10.2134/jeq2001.302624x 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.09.014 10.1016/0021-8634(92)80072-Z 10.2527/1998.7651331x 10.13031/2013.19184 10.3390/s100807287 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.12.003 10.2134/jeq2005.0370 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600032 10.13031/2013.11063 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01105_47.x 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466121 10.13031/2013.13258 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464711 10.1021/jf050763b 10.13031/2013.15634 10.1093/chromsci/44.7.451 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright MDPI AG 2010 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2010 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright MDPI AG 2010 – notice: 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2010 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7S9 L.6 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.3390/s100908536 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Engineering Chemistry |
| EISSN | 1424-8220 |
| EndPage | 8552 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_de33992a40a341dfafbd250e96f0f0be PMC3231241 3340398591 22163671 10_3390_s100908536 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | United States--US |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
| GroupedDBID | --- 123 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FE 8FG 8FI 8FJ AADQD AAHBH AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACUHS ADBBV ADMLS ADRAZ AENEX AFKRA AFZYC ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1I DU5 E3Z EBD ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HH5 HMCUK HYE IPNFZ KQ8 L6V M1P M48 MODMG M~E OK1 OVT P2P P62 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RIG RNS RPM TUS UKHRP XSB ~8M CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IAO ITC NPM PJZUB PPXIY 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7S9 L.6 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-4d59e7f610ec73ad39dd2ce2683eaed085b2bca5c2e3f5f943b97281b435ee0b3 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1424-8220 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:36 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 13:36:44 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 07:16:02 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 23:35:21 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 09:40:06 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:01:59 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:39:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:40 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 9 |
| Keywords | gas chromatography-mass spectrometry volatile fatty acid animal feeding operation single-compound odor threshold odor activity value volatile organic compound odor detection threshold Tedlar odor sampling |
| Language | English |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c503t-4d59e7f610ec73ad39dd2ce2683eaed085b2bca5c2e3f5f943b97281b435ee0b3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2387-0354 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1537570621?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 22163671 |
| PQID | 1537570621 |
| PQPubID | 2032333 |
| PageCount | 17 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de33992a40a341dfafbd250e96f0f0be pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3231241 proquest_miscellaneous_919958930 proquest_miscellaneous_772269054 proquest_journals_1537570621 pubmed_primary_22163671 crossref_primary_10_3390_s100908536 crossref_citationtrail_10_3390_s100908536 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2010-09-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2010 text: 2010-09-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland – name: Basel |
| PublicationTitle | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Sensors (Basel) |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: MDPI AG – name: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
| References | ref_50 Koziel (ref_17) 2005; 55 Loughrin (ref_26) 2006; 35 ref_12 ref_56 Clanton (ref_42) 1999; 42 ref_55 ref_10 ref_51 Spinhirne (ref_41) 2003; 46 Keener (ref_13) 2002; 45 ref_16 Hayashida (ref_46) 2005; 11 ref_15 Trabue (ref_14) 2006; 35 ref_25 ref_24 McGinn (ref_28) 2003; 32 ref_23 ref_22 ref_21 ref_20 Kim (ref_54) 2008; 42 ref_29 ref_27 Mochalski (ref_19) 2009; 877 ref_36 ref_35 ref_34 Mackie (ref_4) 1998; 76 ref_32 ref_31 ref_39 Kim (ref_52) 2010; 10 ref_38 Sunesson (ref_33) 2001; 3 Yamanaka (ref_11) 2009; 44 ref_47 ref_45 ref_44 ref_43 ref_40 ref_1 Phillips (ref_30) 1992; 53 ref_3 ref_2 Parker (ref_5) 2005; 48 (ref_9) 2003; 53 Zahn (ref_37) 2001; 30 Oka (ref_53) 2004; 23 ref_48 ref_8 Koziel (ref_18) 2006; 44 Wright (ref_49) 2005; 53 ref_7 ref_6 16391290 - J Environ Qual. 2006 Jan-Feb;35(1):194-9 11285926 - J Environ Qual. 2001 Mar-Apr;30(2):624-34 14685265 - EMBO J. 2004 Jan 14;23(1):120-6 16925943 - J Chromatogr Sci. 2006 Aug;44(7):451-7 16248569 - J Agric Food Chem. 2005 Nov 2;53(22):8663-72 19109077 - J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009 Jan 15;877(3):189-96 12568253 - J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Jan;53(1):51-60 11354733 - J Environ Monit. 2001 Feb;3(2):210-6 12931870 - J Environ Qual. 2003 Jul-Aug;32(4):1173-82 9621939 - J Anim Sci. 1998 May;76(5):1331-42 16187584 - J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Aug;55(8):1147-57 22163603 - Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(8):7287-302 16899738 - J Environ Qual. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):1668-77 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref_39 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199631469.001.0001 – volume: 42 start-page: 5061 year: 2008 ident: ref_54 article-title: A comparative analysis of malodor samples between direct (olfactometry) and indirect (instrumental) methods publication-title: Atmos. Environ doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.017 – ident: ref_32 – ident: ref_55 – volume: 35 start-page: 194 year: 2006 ident: ref_26 article-title: Reduction of malodorous compounds from a treated swine anaerobic lagoon publication-title: J. Environ. Qual doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0035 – ident: ref_51 – volume: 32 start-page: 1173 year: 2003 ident: ref_28 article-title: Atmospheric ammonia, volatile fatty acids, and other odorants near beef feedlots publication-title: J. Environ. Qual doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.1173 – volume: 3 start-page: 210 year: 2001 ident: ref_33 article-title: Airborne chemical compounds on dairy farms publication-title: J. Environ. Monit doi: 10.1039/b008873k – volume: 30 start-page: 624 year: 2001 ident: ref_37 article-title: Correlation of human olfactory responses to airborne concentrations of malodorous volatile organic compounds emitted from swine effluent publication-title: J. Environ. Qual doi: 10.2134/jeq2001.302624x – volume: 44 start-page: 1350 year: 2009 ident: ref_11 article-title: Psychological bias caused by notification of odor name in sensory evaluation of odor publication-title: Building Environ doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.09.014 – ident: ref_16 – volume: 53 start-page: 23 year: 1992 ident: ref_30 article-title: A Review of the control of odour nuisance from livestock buildings: Part 3, properties of the odorous substances which have been identified in livestock wastes or in the air around them publication-title: J. Agric. Eng. Res doi: 10.1016/0021-8634(92)80072-Z – volume: 76 start-page: 1331 year: 1998 ident: ref_4 article-title: Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste publication-title: J. Anim Sci doi: 10.2527/1998.7651331x – volume: 48 start-page: 1527 year: 2005 ident: ref_5 article-title: Odor characterization at open-lot beef cattle feedyards using triangular forced-choice olfactometry publication-title: Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng doi: 10.13031/2013.19184 – ident: ref_1 – ident: ref_35 – volume: 10 start-page: 7287 year: 2010 ident: ref_52 article-title: Experimental demonstration of masking phenomena between competing odorants via an air dilution sensory test publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s100807287 – ident: ref_23 – volume: 877 start-page: 189 year: 2009 ident: ref_19 article-title: Suitability of different polymer bags for storage of volatile sulphur compounds relevant to breath analysis publication-title: J. Chromatogr. B doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.12.003 – volume: 35 start-page: 1668 year: 2006 ident: ref_14 article-title: Bias of Tedlar bags in the measurement of agricultural odorants publication-title: J. Environ. Qual doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0370 – ident: ref_8 – ident: ref_31 – volume: 23 start-page: 120 year: 2004 ident: ref_53 article-title: Olfactory receptor antagonism between odorants publication-title: EMBO J doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600032 – ident: ref_56 – ident: ref_27 – ident: ref_48 – ident: ref_10 – volume: 45 start-page: 1579 year: 2002 ident: ref_13 article-title: Evaluation of thermal desorption for the measurement of artificial swine odorants in the vapor phase publication-title: Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng doi: 10.13031/2013.11063 – ident: ref_38 – ident: ref_45 – volume: 11 start-page: 113 year: 2005 ident: ref_46 article-title: Comparison of sampling bags used for measuring breath odor publication-title: Oral Diseases doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01105_47.x – ident: ref_20 – volume: 53 start-page: 51 year: 2003 ident: ref_9 article-title: Odor concentration decay and stability in gas sampling bags publication-title: J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc doi: 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466121 – ident: ref_7 – ident: ref_3 – ident: ref_24 – ident: ref_34 – volume: 42 start-page: 1103 year: 1999 ident: ref_42 article-title: Dynamic olfactometry variability in determining odour dilutions-to-threshold publication-title: Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng doi: 10.13031/2013.13258 – ident: ref_47 – ident: ref_40 – volume: 55 start-page: 1147 year: 2005 ident: ref_17 article-title: Evaluation of sample recovery of madodorous livestock gases from air sampling bags, solid phase microextraction fibers, Tenax TA sorbent tubes, and sampling canisters publication-title: J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc doi: 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464711 – ident: ref_44 – volume: 53 start-page: 8663 year: 2005 ident: ref_49 article-title: Multidimensional gas chromatography-olfactometry for identification and prioritization of malodors from confined animal feeding operations publication-title: J. Agric. Food Chem doi: 10.1021/jf050763b – ident: ref_21 – volume: 46 start-page: 1639 year: 2003 ident: ref_41 article-title: Generation and calibration of standard gas mixtures for volatile fatty acids using permeation tubes and solid-phase microextraction publication-title: Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng doi: 10.13031/2013.15634 – ident: ref_6 – ident: ref_25 – ident: ref_50 – ident: ref_29 – ident: ref_2 – ident: ref_12 – ident: ref_15 – ident: ref_36 – ident: ref_43 – ident: ref_22 – volume: 44 start-page: 451 year: 2006 ident: ref_18 article-title: Solid phase microextraction as a novel air sampling technology for improved, GC-Olfactometry-based, assessment of livestock odors publication-title: J. Chromatogr. Sci doi: 10.1093/chromsci/44.7.451 – reference: 22163603 - Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(8):7287-302 – reference: 16925943 - J Chromatogr Sci. 2006 Aug;44(7):451-7 – reference: 9621939 - J Anim Sci. 1998 May;76(5):1331-42 – reference: 19109077 - J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009 Jan 15;877(3):189-96 – reference: 16899738 - J Environ Qual. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):1668-77 – reference: 12931870 - J Environ Qual. 2003 Jul-Aug;32(4):1173-82 – reference: 16248569 - J Agric Food Chem. 2005 Nov 2;53(22):8663-72 – reference: 16391290 - J Environ Qual. 2006 Jan-Feb;35(1):194-9 – reference: 16187584 - J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Aug;55(8):1147-57 – reference: 14685265 - EMBO J. 2004 Jan 14;23(1):120-6 – reference: 11285926 - J Environ Qual. 2001 Mar-Apr;30(2):624-34 – reference: 11354733 - J Environ Monit. 2001 Feb;3(2):210-6 – reference: 12568253 - J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Jan;53(1):51-60 |
| SSID | ssj0023338 |
| Score | 2.2003045 |
| Snippet | Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 8536 |
| SubjectTerms | acetic acid Air pollution analysis animal feeding operation animal feeding operations Animal Husbandry bags Brand names butyric acid chemistry Chromatography Emissions Environmental Monitoring Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation Environmental Monitoring - methods Fatty Acids Fatty Acids - analysis Fluorides gas chromatography Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods Gases hexanoic acid Humans instrumentation isobutyric acid Laboratories Mass spectrometry methods odor activity value odor detection threshold odor sampling Odorants Odorants - analysis Odors off odors olfactometry p-cresol Polyethylene Glycols Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry Polyethylene Terephthalates polymers Polyvinyls Polyvinyls - chemistry propionic acid Regression Analysis sampling Scientific imaging Sensors single-compound odor threshold Tedlar valeric acid VOCs volatile fatty acid volatile organic compound Volatile organic compounds Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELWqntoDgrbAQkGW6IVDhGPHdnxsEauqEtBDi3qL_DEuK4UE7W6R9t8zTrLpblXUC7cosRx7PJ55k3jeEHKSOyV9dDFTMqisCCHPylK6LGguS6tDDjZ9h_z6TZ1fFxc38maj1Fc6E9bTA_eC-xRAJO5UWzCLBjdEG11Atw1GRRaZg2R90eetg6kh1BKiq2Gd0rgydIGsJybFnlhKmmMGgUZHynzvijrG_sdg5sPTkhvuZ_qcPBtwIz3tx_uC7EBzQPY32AQPyY8USqJmrmgb6entfGTVoN9DO19Q24TuCmN9msxAKqi0oCm_hF629erPrFnVdFrftfNZADqd1b_omb1dHJHr6Zerz-fZUDYh85KJJQpcGtARcRF4LWwQJgTugatSgIWAU3fceSs9BxFlNIVwRnOEr4icAJgTL8lu0zbwmlDhHIMAMg-eF6XXThQalDEYU-MbWD4hH9cSrPzAKZ5KW9QVxhZJ2tW9tCfkw9j2d8-k8Wirs7QQY4vEft3dQJ2oBp2ontKJCTleL2M1bMlFhaZdS80Ux1HT8TFupvSHxDaAwq8w1ODKIIr9dxOTctoR5LEJedXrxThWzhHcKo396y2N2ZrM9pNm9rOj9BYIsxFLvfkfs39L9vojDukg3DHZXc7v4B0ip6V7322Sv4_VGDc priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lj9MwELZgucAB8SawIEtw4RDh2LEdn9Auoloh8TiwqLfIj3GpVJKl6SL13zNO0nSLFm5RPErs8dj-xh5_Q8jrwinpo4u5kkHlZQhFXlXS5UFzWVkdCrBpH_LTZ3V2Xn6cy_m44daNYZW7ObGfqEPr0x75WxyZWmqmePHu4leeskal09UxhcZNcitRl6WQLj3fO1wC_a-BklSga5-uyzGDEKOnY94vQj1X_3UA8-84ySsLz-weuTsiRnoydPF9cgOaB-TOFR7Bh-R7ciLRJre0jfRksZ74NOiX0K47apvQP6GXT9MEkFIpdTTdLKFf29X297LZruhsdYntDUBny9VPemoX3SNyPvvw7f1ZPiZMyL1kYoOqlgZ0REQEXgsbhAmBe-CqEmAhYNMdd95Kz0FEGU0pnNEcgStiJgDmxGNy1LQNPCVUOMcggCyC52XltROlBmUMetP4B1Zk5M1Og7Uf2cRTUotVjV5F0na913ZGXk2yFwOHxrVSp6kjJonEe92_aNeLehxGdQCRmHRtySwuvyHa6AKCODAqssgcZOR41431OBi7em86GaFTMQ6jdDZiG0Dl1-hkcGUQv_5bxKTb7AjvWEaeDHYx1ZVzhLVK4_f1gcUcNOawpFn-6Mm8BQJsRFHP_l_x5-T2ELaQgtuOydFmfQkvEA1t3Mve5P8A6XQMvQ priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Recovery of Agricultural Odors and Odorous Compounds from Polyvinyl Fluoride Film Bags |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22163671 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1537570621 https://www.proquest.com/docview/772269054 https://www.proquest.com/docview/919958930 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3231241 https://doaj.org/article/de33992a40a341dfafbd250e96f0f0be |
| Volume | 10 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwELb6uMAB8WZLWVmCC4cgx47t5IAQRV0qpFYIsWhvkR2PtyuFpGS3FfvvGSfZ0K0WcYmixHmNZzLfl9jfEPImtkoW3vpISaeixLk4SlNpI6e5TI12MZjwHfL8Qp1Nky8zOdsjm_qdvQGXO6ldqCc1bcp3v3-tP2DAvw-MEyl7mAbHMoQOQu2TQ8xIOgToeTL8TeBCtBWtw6SuCBMi62RK7xy7lZha_f5doPPu2MlbyWjykDzoUST92HX7I7IH1WNy_5a24BPyIxBL9NM1rT0182bQ2KBIRJslNZVr15D50zCuPJRXWtIw24Re1eX6ZlGtS-rL67pZOKB-Uf6k1syXT8l0cvr901nUF1GICsnECs0vM9AeURIUWhgnMud4AVylAgw4fHTLbWFkwUF46bNE2ExzBLOIowCYFc_IQVVX8IJQYS0DBzJ2BU_SQluRaFBZhgwbr8DiEXm7sWBe9ArjodBFmSPTCNbO_1p7RF4Pba86XY2drU5CRwwtghZ2u6Fu5nkfWrkDEdR1TcIMpmTnjbcOgR1kyjPPLIzI8aYb841_5fii11IzxfGu6bAbQyv8LzEVoPFzJB5cZYhp_90kCzPcEfKxEXne-cVwr5wj1FUaz6-3PGbrYbb3VIvLVuBbIOhGPz76_2VfknvdcIYw6O2YHKyaa3iFKGllx2RfzzQu08nnMTk8Ob34-m3cfnEYt8HxB1yKF3U |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lj9MwELaW5QAcEG8CC1gCDhwiHDuO6wNCu0DVZR9w2EW9BTuelEohWZoW1D_Fb2ScpOkWLdz2FsUjxxnP2N_48Q0hLyKbyCy3eZhIl4Sxc1E4GEgbOsXlwCgXgfHrkEfHyeg0_jiW4y3ye3UXxh-rXI2JzUDtqsyvkb9Gz1RSsYRHb89-hD5rlN9dXaXQaM3iAJa_MGSr3-y_x_59yfnww8m7UdhlFQgzycQc2yM1qBxhA2RKGCe0czwDngwEGHAIQSy3mZEZB5HLXMfCasUR3SGwAGBWYL1XyFWceJn3KDVeB3gC472WAlUIzfz1PKaxvob-eT3pNbkBLgK0f5_LPDfRDW-Rmx1CpbutSd0mW1DeITfO8RbeJV980Io-sKRVTncns56_g35y1aympnTNU7WoqR9wfOqmmvqbLPRzVSx_TstlQYfFAvXrgA6nxXe6Zyb1PXJ6Kaq8T7bLqoSHhAprGTiQkct4PMiUFbGCRGuM3vELLArIq5UG06xjL_dJNIoUoxiv7XSt7YA872XPWs6OC6X2fEf0Ep5nu3lRzSZp57apA-GZe03MDE73Lje5dQgaQSc5y5mFgOysujHtnL9O16YaENoXo9v6vRhTAio_xaCGJxrx8r9FtL89j3CSBeRBaxd9WzlHGJ0orF9tWMzGz2yWlNNvDXm4QECPqO3R_xv-jFwbnRwdpof7xwePyfX2yIQ_WLdDtuezBTxBJDa3Txvzp-TrZfvbHyplStg |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pb9MwFLbGkBAcEL8JDLAEHDhEc-w4rg8IbYxqYzB2YKi3YMfPXaUuGU0L6r_GX8dzkrYrGtx2i2LLcZ7fs79nP3-PkFeJzWThrY8z6bI4dS6Jez1pY6e47BnlEjBhH_LzUbZ_kn4cyMEG-b24CxPCKhdzYjNRu6oIe-TbaJlKKpbxZNt3YRHHe_135z_ikEEqnLQu0mm0KnII81_ovtVvD_ZwrF9z3v_w9f1-3GUYiAvJxBT7JjUojxACCiWME9o5XgDPegIMOIQjltvCyIKD8NLrVFitOCI9BBkAzAps9xq5roRMgo2pwcrZE-j7tXSoQmgWruoxje01VNCrBbDJE3AZuP07RvPCote_Q253aJXutOp1l2xAeY_cusBheJ98Cw4s2sOcVp7uDCdLLg_6xVWTmprSNU_VrKZh8glpnGoabrXQ42o8_zkq52PaH89Qvg5ofzQ-o7tmWD8gJ1ciyodks6xKeEyosJaBA5m4gqe9QlmRKsi0Rk8ev8CSiLxZSDAvOibzkFBjnKNHE6Sdr6QdkZfLuuctf8eltXbDQCxrBM7t5kU1GeadCecORGDxNSkzuPQ7b7x1CCBBZ555ZiEiW4thzLuJoM5XahsRuixGEw7nMqYEFH6ODg7PNGLnf1fR4SY9QksWkUetXiz7yjlC6kxh-2pNY9Z-Zr2kHJ02ROICwT0iuCf_7_gLcgMtLf90cHT4lNxsoydCjN0W2ZxOZvAMQdnUPm-0n5LvV21ufwBKGk8O |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recovery+of+agricultural+odors+and+odorous+compounds+from+polyvinyl+fluoride+film+bags&rft.jtitle=Sensors+%28Basel%2C+Switzerland%29&rft.au=Parker%2C+David+B&rft.au=Perschbacher-Buser%2C+Zena+L&rft.au=Cole%2C+N+Andy&rft.au=Koziel%2C+Jacek+A&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=8536&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fs100908536&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1424-8220&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1424-8220&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1424-8220&client=summon |