The Effects of Combined Respiratory-Gated Auricular Vagal Afferent Nerve Stimulation and Mindfulness Meditation for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study

• Published in: Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Vol. 23; no. 9; pp. 1570 - 1581
• Main Authors: Meints, Samantha M, Garcia, Ronald G, Schuman-Olivier, Zev, Datko, Michael, Desbordes, Gaelle, Cornelius, Marise, Edwards, Robert R, Napadow, Vitaly
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 01.09.2022
• Subjects: Adult; Analgesics; Back pain; Care and treatment; Chronic pain; Chronic Pain - therapy; Combined modality therapy; Emotions; Feasibility studies; Humans; Integrative Medicine Section; Low back pain; Low Back Pain - therapy; Meditation; Meditation - methods; Methods; Mindfulness; Mindfulness - methods; Mindfulness meditation; Patient outcomes; Pilot Projects; Sensory neurons; Vagus nerve; Vagus nerve stimulation; Vagus Nerve Stimulation - methods; United States
• ISSN: 1526-2375; 1526-4637; 1526-4637
• DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac025

Abstract Objective Respiratory-gated Auricular Vagal Afferent Nerve stimulation (RAVANS) is a safe nonpharmacological approach to managing chronic pain. The purpose of the current study was to examine (1) the feasibility and acceptability of RAVANS, combined with mindful meditation (MM) for chronic low back pain (CLBP), (2) the potential synergy of MM+RAVANS on improving pain, and (3) possible moderators of the influence of MM+RAVANS on pain. Design Pilot feasibility and acceptability study. Setting Pain management center at large academic medical center. Subjects Nineteen adults with CLBP and previous MM training. Methods Participants attended two sessions during which they completed quantitative sensory testing (QST), rated pain severity, and completed a MM+stimulation session. Participants received RAVANS during one visit and sham stimulation during the other, randomized in order. Following intervention, participants repeated QST. Results MM+RAVANS was well tolerated, acceptable, and feasible to provide relief for CLBP. Both MM+stimulation sessions resulted in improved back pain severity, punctate pain ratings, and pressure pain threshold. Individuals with greater negative affect showed greater back pain improvement from MM+RAVANS while those with greater mindfulness showed greater back pain improvement from MM+sham. Conclusions Results suggest that for CLBP patients with prior MM training, the analgesic effects of MM may have overshadowed effects of RAVANS given the brief single session MM+RAVANS intervention. However, those with greater negative affect may benefit from combined MM+RAVANS.