Efficient Utilization of the Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Deceased Donor Kidney Pool: An Analysis of the Effect of Labeling
We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age ≥ 60, or age 50–59 with ≥ 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of transplantation Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 304 - 309 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.02.2010
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1600-6135 1600-6143 1600-6143 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x |
Cover
Abstract | We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age ≥ 60, or age 50–59 with ≥ 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just‐younger versus just‐older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0–1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0–1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with ≥ 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys.
The creation of a specific definition of an Expanded Criteria Donor for kidney transplantation corresponded to changes in number of such donors acquired and likelihood of use of such organs. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age ≥ 60, or age 50–59 with ≥ 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just-younger versus just-older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with ≥ 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys. We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age > or = 60, or age 50-59 with > or = 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just-younger versus just-older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with > or = 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys. We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age > or = 60, or age 50-59 with > or = 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just-younger versus just-older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with > or = 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys.We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age > or = 60, or age 50-59 with > or = 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just-younger versus just-older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with > or = 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys. We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age ≥ 60, or age 50–59 with ≥ 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just‐younger versus just‐older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0–1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0–1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with ≥ 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys. The creation of a specific definition of an Expanded Criteria Donor for kidney transplantation corresponded to changes in number of such donors acquired and likelihood of use of such organs. |
Author | Hirth, R. A. Merion, R. M. Schaubel, D. E. Pan, Q. |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 4 Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 3 Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC 5 Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 2 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), Ann Arbor, MI |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI – name: 3 Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC – name: 5 Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI – name: 2 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), Ann Arbor, MI – name: 4 Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: R. A. surname: Hirth fullname: Hirth, R. A. – sequence: 2 givenname: Q. surname: Pan fullname: Pan, Q. – sequence: 3 givenname: D. E. surname: Schaubel fullname: Schaubel, D. E. – sequence: 4 givenname: R. M. surname: Merion fullname: Merion, R. M. |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22422825$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20055795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNUttuEzEQtVARvcAvIL8g6EOCL-vdGAmkKAnXSPDQPlte77h15NjpekMTxMfjbdIUeKplyWPPzDkzPnOKjkIMgBCmZEjzersY0pKQQUkLPmSEyCFhklfDzRN0cnAcHWwujtFpSgtCaMVG7Bk6zjlCVFKcoN8za51xEDp82TnvfunOxYCjxd014NlmpUMDDZ60roPWaTyNIbb4zWwyPcdTMKBT9u4ev7kmwBb_iNG_w-OQt_bb5NIBzFowXX-b6xq8C1fP0VOrfYIX-_MMXX6cXUw-D-bfP32ZjOcDIwivBlYISynjJdSlZlbWljejUlghG1vVQFkDUtDcj7WaFIWtG-AjUdOKWylZTfgZ-rDDXa3rJTQmd9tqr1atW-p2q6J26l9PcNfqKv5URSFKQmkGeL0HaOPNGlKnli4Z8F4HiOukKs4lZWXBcuTLv6kOHPc_ngNe7QN0MtrbVgfj0kMcK1jWSDzUbNqYUgtWGdfdiZMrdF5RovpRUAvVq6x6xXsSqe5GQW0ywOg_gHuOR6S-36XeOg_bR-ep8deL3uJ_AA5pyu4 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfac300 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_12383 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_14266 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_12154 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2011_03789_x crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_13867 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_kint_2016_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_14712 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2010_03359_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2012_04167_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2012_04146_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2018_00179 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_0012_2010_01356_x crossref_primary_10_6002_ect_2011_0147 crossref_primary_10_4285_jkstn_2010_24_3_159 crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000001715 crossref_primary_10_2215_CJN_07190715 crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000001718 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/00007890-200211150-00014 10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00065-5 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01390.x 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20804.x 10.1016/S0041-1345(97)82536-5 10.1002/cjs.5550360111 10.1016/S0041-1345(00)02443-X 10.1097/01.TP.0000161225.89368.81 10.1111/1475-6773.00212 10.1097/00007890-200204270-00034 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01506.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons 2015 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1600-6143 |
EndPage | 309 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC4456011 20055795 22422825 10_1111_j_1600_6143_2009_02937_x AJT2937 |
Genre | article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: PHS HHS grantid: 234-2005-37009C – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS grantid: R01 DK070869 |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 10A 1OC 23M 24P 2WC 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AALRI AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAXUO AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPPZ ABPVW ABXGK ACAHQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADVLN ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AFBPY AFEBI AFGKR AFJKZ AFPWT AFZJQ AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AITUG AIURR AIWBW AJAOE AJBDE AKRWK ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMRAJ AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DIK DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM E3Z EBS EJD ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FDB FIJ FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA GX1 H.X HF~ HZI HZ~ IHE IPNFZ IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M41 MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SUPJJ TEORI TR2 UB1 V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WIN WOHZO WOW WQJ WRC WVDHM WXI XG1 YFH YUY ZZTAW ~IA ~WT 0R~ AAFWJ AAYWO AAYXX ACVFH ADCNI AEUPX AFPUW AGCQF AIGII AKBMS AKYEP APXCP CITATION AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY EFKBS IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5037-f55f11236eb6a2f9bf3d865f59df7be12de951579ffa044fbde385b173f992b03 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1600-6135 1600-6143 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:09:06 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 11:36:24 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:52:30 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:15:30 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:25:15 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:58:09 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Suboptimal donor Expanded criteria donors Use utilization Homotransplantation Kidney Treatment Urinary system Surgery Analysis Graft Pool Cadaver Kidney transplantation |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5037-f55f11236eb6a2f9bf3d865f59df7be12de951579ffa044fbde385b173f992b03 |
Notes | Funding Sources: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients is funded by contract number 234–2005‐37009C from the Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Government. Human Subjects Statement: This study was approved by HRSA's SRTR project officer. HRSA has determined that this study satisfies the criteria for the IRB exemption described in the ‘Public Benefit and Service Program’ provisions of 45 CFR 46.101(b)(5) and HRSA Circular 03. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://www.amjtransplant.org/article/S1600613522195791/pdf |
PMID | 20055795 |
PQID | 733912642 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4456011 proquest_miscellaneous_733912642 pubmed_primary_20055795 pascalfrancis_primary_22422825 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2009_02937_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2009_02937_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2009_02937_x_AJT2937 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | February 2010 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2010 text: February 2010 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Malden, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Malden, USA – name: Hoboken, NJ – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | American journal of transplantation |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Transplant |
PublicationYear | 2010 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Inc – name: Wiley |
References | 2008; 36 1997; 29 2002; 2 2002; 37 2006; 6 2007; 7 2002; 74 2001; 33 2002; 73 2005; 79 2001; 20 Pan (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib10) 2008; 36 Byrne (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib8) 2001; 20 Persijn (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib4) 1997; 29 Freeman (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib12) 2006; 6 Rao (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib13) 2007; 7 Sung (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib3) 2005; 79 Port (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib9) 2002; 74 Arnold (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib7) 2002; 73 Schold (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib11) 2006; 6 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib2 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib6 Stogis (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib5) 2002; 37 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib1 Rosengard (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib14) 2002; 2 Alfrey (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib15) 2001; 33 |
References_xml | – volume: 33 start-page: 1162 year: 2001 end-page: 1163 article-title: Matching does not improve outcome from aged marginal kidney donors publication-title: Transplant Proc – volume: 36 start-page: 111 year: 2008 end-page: 127 article-title: Proportional hazards regression based on biased samples and estimated selection probabilities publication-title: Can J Stat – volume: 20 start-page: 69 year: 2001 end-page: 83 article-title: A positive analysis of financial incentives for cadaveric organ transplantation publication-title: J Health Econo – volume: 2 start-page: 701 year: 2002 end-page: 711 article-title: Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor publication-title: Am J Transplant – volume: 79 start-page: 1257 year: 2005 end-page: 1261 article-title: Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on the use of expanded criteria donor kidneys publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 29 start-page: 1614 year: 1997 end-page: 1617 article-title: Public education and organ donation publication-title: Transplantation Proceedings – volume: 6 start-page: 2225 year: 2006 end-page: 2227 article-title: It is time to re‐think the ‘Extended Criteria’ publication-title: Am J Transplant – volume: 6 start-page: 1689 year: 2006 end-page: 1695 article-title: The expanded criteria donor policy: An evaluation of program objectives and indirect ramifications publication-title: Am J Transplant – volume: 73 start-page: 1361 year: 2002 end-page: 1367 article-title: Financial incentives for cadaver organ donation: an ethical reappraisal publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 74 start-page: 1281 year: 2002 end-page: 1286 article-title: Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 37 start-page: 1329 year: 2002 end-page: 1344 article-title: Using a Standardized Donation Ratio to Assess the Performance of Organ Procurement Organizations publication-title: Health Serv Res – volume: 7 start-page: 307 issue: suppl 2 year: 2007 article-title: Kidney donor risk index [abstract] publication-title: Am J Transplant – volume: 74 start-page: 1281 year: 2002 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib9 article-title: Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors publication-title: Transplantation doi: 10.1097/00007890-200211150-00014 – ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib1 – ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib2 – volume: 20 start-page: 69 year: 2001 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib8 article-title: A positive analysis of financial incentives for cadaveric organ transplantation publication-title: J Health Econo doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00065-5 – volume: 6 start-page: 1689 year: 2006 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib11 article-title: The expanded criteria donor policy: An evaluation of program objectives and indirect ramifications publication-title: Am J Transplant doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01390.x – volume: 7 start-page: 307 issue: suppl 2 year: 2007 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib13 article-title: Kidney donor risk index [abstract] publication-title: Am J Transplant – volume: 2 start-page: 701 year: 2002 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib14 article-title: Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor publication-title: Am J Transplant doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20804.x – volume: 29 start-page: 1614 year: 1997 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib4 article-title: Public education and organ donation publication-title: Transplantation Proceedings doi: 10.1016/S0041-1345(97)82536-5 – volume: 36 start-page: 111 year: 2008 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib10 article-title: Proportional hazards regression based on biased samples and estimated selection probabilities publication-title: Can J Stat doi: 10.1002/cjs.5550360111 – volume: 33 start-page: 1162 year: 2001 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib15 article-title: Matching does not improve outcome from aged marginal kidney donors publication-title: Transplant Proc doi: 10.1016/S0041-1345(00)02443-X – ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib6 – volume: 79 start-page: 1257 year: 2005 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib3 article-title: Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on the use of expanded criteria donor kidneys publication-title: Transplantation doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000161225.89368.81 – volume: 37 start-page: 1329 year: 2002 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib5 article-title: Using a Standardized Donation Ratio to Assess the Performance of Organ Procurement Organizations publication-title: Health Serv Res doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00212 – volume: 73 start-page: 1361 year: 2002 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib7 article-title: Financial incentives for cadaver organ donation: an ethical reappraisal publication-title: Transplantation doi: 10.1097/00007890-200204270-00034 – volume: 6 start-page: 2225 year: 2006 ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib12 article-title: It is time to re-think the ‘Extended Criteria’ publication-title: Am J Transplant doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01506.x |
SSID | ssj0017282 |
Score | 2.0532093 |
Snippet | We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 304 |
SubjectTerms | Biological and medical sciences Clinical Laboratory Techniques Expanded criteria donors Humans Kidney - surgery kidney transplantation Medical sciences Names Probability Registries Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the urinary system Tissue Donors - statistics & numerical data utilization |
Title | Efficient Utilization of the Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Deceased Donor Kidney Pool: An Analysis of the Effect of Labeling |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1600-6143.2009.02937.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20055795 https://www.proquest.com/docview/733912642 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4456011 |
Volume | 10 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3da9swEBejT4OxbuzL7Rr0sIf1ISGyLMvaW0hSSvfBKA30zUiWREODHZoEutI_vney49VbH0rpm7_O2Oc763fS3e8I-eJ8rDJM1YmFVRCg6GHfpG7Y16mOcRkp86HX4c9f6fEsOTkX503-E9bC1PwQ7YQbekb4X6ODa7PqOjkM1hD6JLyhnYSRSw4QTzKeIo3-5LRlksIuTGHhsxbhopvU8-CNOiPVq6VegdJ83e3iITj6f1blfbQbhqujXXK5fdE6S-VysFmbQXHzDwfk82jiDXndoFo6qs3wLXnhynfkdhroKeA56Ww9XzQFn7TyFEAnnV4vcf7aUmy2gG5AJ1VZXdGv0_HkkE5cgetGtjn4fW5L94f-rqrFNzoq6ZZKpb1ZyErBvR_ahAr792R2ND0bH_ebZg_9QmCpohfCM6SCcQbMxCvjuc1S4YWyXhrHYusADAqpvNfDJPHGOp4JwyT3SsVmyD-QnbIq3SdCRSGYLayOQSrhWhuIiaSTqZKCSZNlEZHbD5sXDRM6NuRY5PciItBojhrFPp0qDxrNryPCWsllzQbyCJlex3ZaQQBPMVYOR4RujSkH38YFG126arPKJeeKAWKNI_Kxtq2_woE8TYGw7FhdewHShnfPlPOLQB-eJBiFs4ikwage_SL56OQMt_aeKrhPXta5F5gM9JnsrK827gAg3dr0grPeAd--O7Q |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3da9swEBeje9hg7IN9ed06Pexhe0iILcuy9haalKxNyxgJ9E1IlkTDgh3aBLrRP353suPVbR_K2Ju_ztjnO-t30t3vCPnkfCJzTNVJuJUQoOhBz2Ru0NOZTnAZKfeh1-HxSTaZp4en_LRpB4S1MDU_RDvhhp4R_tfo4Dgh3fVyGK0h9klZwzsJQ5foA6B8mALuwEhs9KPlksI-TGHps5ZhvJvWc-edOmPVk5W-ALX5ut_FXYD0dl7ldbwbBqyDZ2S5fdU6T-Vnf7M2_eL3DRbI_6SL5-RpA2zpsLbEF-SBK1-Sq3FgqIAHpfP1YtnUfNLKU8CddHy5wilsS7HfAnoCHVVldU4_j_dHX-jIFbh0ZJuDRwtbul_0e1Utv9JhSbdsKu3NQmIK7k21CUX2r8j8YDzbn_Safg-9gmO1oufcx8gG4wxYipfGM5tn3HNpvTAuTqwDPMiF9F4P0tQb61jOTSyYlzIxA_aa7JRV6d4Sygse28LqBKRSprWBsEg4kUnBY2HyPCJi-2VV0ZChY0-OpboWFIFGFWoUW3VKFTSqLiMSt5KrmhDkHjJ7HeNpBQE_JVg8HBG6tSYF7o1rNrp01eZCCcZkDKA1icib2rj-Cgf-NAnComN27QXIHN49Uy7OAoN4mmIgHkckC1Z17xdRw8MZbr37V8GP5NFkdjxV028nR7vkcZ2KgblB78nO-nzjPgDCW5u94Ll_AJ7rP9M |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3da9swEBelgzIYW8u-vLWdHvawPSTElmVZewtNQtd2pYwG-iYkS2KhwQ5tAt3YH7872XHrrQ9l9M1fZ-zznfU76e53hHx0PpE5puok3EoIUPSgZzI36OlMJ7iMlPvQ6_DbaXY4TY8u-EWT_4S1MDU_RDvhhp4R_tfo4Avru04OgzWEPilraCdh5BJ9wJNP0gyABQKk7y2VFLZhCiuftQzj3ayee-_UGaqeLfQ1aM3X7S7uw6P_plXehbthvJq8IJfrN63TVC77q6XpF7_-IoF8HFVsk-cNrKXD2g53yIYrX5Lf48BPAc9Jp8vZvKn4pJWngDrp-GaBE9iWYrcF9AM6qsrqin4aH4w-05ErcOHINgePZ7Z0P-lZVc2_0GFJ11wq7c1CWgrunWgTSuxfkelkfH5w2Gu6PfQKjrWKnnMfIxeMM2AnXhrPbJ5xz6X1wrg4sQ7QIBfSez1IU2-sYzk3sWBeysQM2GuyWVale0soL3hsC6sTkEqZ1gaCIuFEJgWPhcnziIj1h1VFQ4WOHTnm6k5IBBpVqFFs1ClV0Ki6iUjcSi5qOpAHyOx3bKcVBPSUYOlwROjamBQ4N67Y6NJVq2slGJMxQNYkIm9q27oVDuxpEoRFx-raC5A3vHumnP0I_OFpimF4HJEsGNWDX0QNj85x693_Cn4gW2ejiTr5enr8njyt8zAwMWiXbC6vVm4P4N3S7Ae__QOa1T6C |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficient+utilization+of+the+expanded+criteria+donor+%28ECD%29+deceased+donor+kidney+pool%3A+an+analysis+of+the+effect+of+labeling&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+transplantation&rft.au=Hirth%2C+R+A&rft.au=Pan%2C+Q&rft.au=Schaubel%2C+D+E&rft.au=Merion%2C+R+M&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.issn=1600-6143&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1600-6143.2009.02937.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1600-6135&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1600-6135&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1600-6135&client=summon |