Efficient Utilization of the Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Deceased Donor Kidney Pool: An Analysis of the Effect of Labeling

We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age ≥ 60, or age 50–59 with ≥ 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of transplantation Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 304 - 309
Main Authors Hirth, R. A., Pan, Q., Schaubel, D. E., Merion, R. M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.02.2010
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1600-6135
1600-6143
1600-6143
DOI10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x

Cover

Abstract We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age ≥ 60, or age 50–59 with ≥ 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just‐younger versus just‐older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0–1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0–1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with ≥ 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys. The creation of a specific definition of an Expanded Criteria Donor for kidney transplantation corresponded to changes in number of such donors acquired and likelihood of use of such organs.
AbstractList We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age ≥ 60, or age 50–59 with ≥ 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just-younger versus just-older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with ≥ 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys.
We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age > or = 60, or age 50-59 with > or = 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just-younger versus just-older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with > or = 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys.
We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age > or = 60, or age 50-59 with > or = 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just-younger versus just-older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with > or = 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys.We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age > or = 60, or age 50-59 with > or = 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just-younger versus just-older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0-1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with > or = 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys.
We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD is age ≥ 60, or age 50–59 with ≥ 2 of 3 specified comorbidities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2005, we modeled recovery rates through linear regression and transplantation probabilities via logistic regression, focusing on organs from donors just‐younger versus just‐older than the ECD age thresholds. We split the sample at July 1, 2002 to determine how decisions changed at the approximate time of implementation of the ECD definition. Before July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0–1 comorbidities dropped at age 60, but transplantation probabilities given recovery did not. After July 2002, the number of recovered kidneys with 0–1 comorbidities rose at age 60, but transplantation probabilities contingent on recovery declined. No similar trends were observed at donor age 50 among donors with ≥ 2 comorbidities. Overall, implementation of the ECD definition coincided with a reversal of an apparent reluctance to recover kidneys from donors over age 59, but increased selectiveness on the part of surgeons/centers with respect to these kidneys. The creation of a specific definition of an Expanded Criteria Donor for kidney transplantation corresponded to changes in number of such donors acquired and likelihood of use of such organs.
Author Hirth, R. A.
Merion, R. M.
Schaubel, D. E.
Pan, Q.
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
4 Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
3 Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC
5 Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
2 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), Ann Arbor, MI
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
– name: 3 Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC
– name: 5 Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
– name: 2 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), Ann Arbor, MI
– name: 4 Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: R. A.
  surname: Hirth
  fullname: Hirth, R. A.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Q.
  surname: Pan
  fullname: Pan, Q.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: D. E.
  surname: Schaubel
  fullname: Schaubel, D. E.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: R. M.
  surname: Merion
  fullname: Merion, R. M.
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22422825$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20055795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNUttuEzEQtVARvcAvIL8g6EOCL-vdGAmkKAnXSPDQPlte77h15NjpekMTxMfjbdIUeKplyWPPzDkzPnOKjkIMgBCmZEjzersY0pKQQUkLPmSEyCFhklfDzRN0cnAcHWwujtFpSgtCaMVG7Bk6zjlCVFKcoN8za51xEDp82TnvfunOxYCjxd014NlmpUMDDZ60roPWaTyNIbb4zWwyPcdTMKBT9u4ev7kmwBb_iNG_w-OQt_bb5NIBzFowXX-b6xq8C1fP0VOrfYIX-_MMXX6cXUw-D-bfP32ZjOcDIwivBlYISynjJdSlZlbWljejUlghG1vVQFkDUtDcj7WaFIWtG-AjUdOKWylZTfgZ-rDDXa3rJTQmd9tqr1atW-p2q6J26l9PcNfqKv5URSFKQmkGeL0HaOPNGlKnli4Z8F4HiOukKs4lZWXBcuTLv6kOHPc_ngNe7QN0MtrbVgfj0kMcK1jWSDzUbNqYUgtWGdfdiZMrdF5RovpRUAvVq6x6xXsSqe5GQW0ywOg_gHuOR6S-36XeOg_bR-ep8deL3uJ_AA5pyu4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfac300
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_12383
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_14266
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_12154
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2011_03789_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_13867
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_kint_2016_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_14712
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2010_03359_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2012_04167_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2012_04146_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2018_00179
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_0012_2010_01356_x
crossref_primary_10_6002_ect_2011_0147
crossref_primary_10_4285_jkstn_2010_24_3_159
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000001715
crossref_primary_10_2215_CJN_07190715
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000001718
Cites_doi 10.1097/00007890-200211150-00014
10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00065-5
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01390.x
10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20804.x
10.1016/S0041-1345(97)82536-5
10.1002/cjs.5550360111
10.1016/S0041-1345(00)02443-X
10.1097/01.TP.0000161225.89368.81
10.1111/1475-6773.00212
10.1097/00007890-200204270-00034
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01506.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1600-6143
EndPage 309
ExternalDocumentID PMC4456011
20055795
22422825
10_1111_j_1600_6143_2009_02937_x
AJT2937
Genre article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: PHS HHS
  grantid: 234-2005-37009C
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DK070869
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
10A
1OC
23M
24P
2WC
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AALRI
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAXUO
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADVLN
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFGKR
AFJKZ
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHMBA
AIACR
AIAGR
AITUG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJAOE
AJBDE
AKRWK
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMRAJ
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DIK
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
E3Z
EBS
EJD
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FDB
FIJ
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GX1
H.X
HF~
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IPNFZ
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M41
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
TR2
UB1
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
XG1
YFH
YUY
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
0R~
AAFWJ
AAYWO
AAYXX
ACVFH
ADCNI
AEUPX
AFPUW
AGCQF
AIGII
AKBMS
AKYEP
APXCP
CITATION
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
EFKBS
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5037-f55f11236eb6a2f9bf3d865f59df7be12de951579ffa044fbde385b173f992b03
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1600-6135
1600-6143
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:09:06 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 11:36:24 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:52:30 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:15:30 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:48 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:25:15 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:58:09 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Suboptimal donor
Expanded criteria donors
Use
utilization
Homotransplantation
Kidney
Treatment
Urinary system
Surgery
Analysis
Graft
Pool
Cadaver
Kidney transplantation
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5037-f55f11236eb6a2f9bf3d865f59df7be12de951579ffa044fbde385b173f992b03
Notes Funding Sources: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients is funded by contract number 234–2005‐37009C from the Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Government.
Human Subjects Statement: This study was approved by HRSA's SRTR project officer. HRSA has determined that this study satisfies the criteria for the IRB exemption described in the ‘Public Benefit and Service Program’ provisions of 45 CFR 46.101(b)(5) and HRSA Circular 03.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://www.amjtransplant.org/article/S1600613522195791/pdf
PMID 20055795
PQID 733912642
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4456011
proquest_miscellaneous_733912642
pubmed_primary_20055795
pascalfrancis_primary_22422825
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2009_02937_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2009_02937_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1600_6143_2009_02937_x_AJT2937
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate February 2010
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2010
  text: February 2010
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Malden, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Malden, USA
– name: Hoboken, NJ
– name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of transplantation
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Transplant
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Inc
– name: Wiley
References 2008; 36
1997; 29
2002; 2
2002; 37
2006; 6
2007; 7
2002; 74
2001; 33
2002; 73
2005; 79
2001; 20
Pan (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib10) 2008; 36
Byrne (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib8) 2001; 20
Persijn (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib4) 1997; 29
Freeman (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib12) 2006; 6
Rao (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib13) 2007; 7
Sung (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib3) 2005; 79
Port (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib9) 2002; 74
Arnold (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib7) 2002; 73
Schold (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib11) 2006; 6
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib2
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib6
Stogis (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib5) 2002; 37
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib1
Rosengard (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib14) 2002; 2
Alfrey (10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib15) 2001; 33
References_xml – volume: 33
  start-page: 1162
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1163
  article-title: Matching does not improve outcome from aged marginal kidney donors
  publication-title: Transplant Proc
– volume: 36
  start-page: 111
  year: 2008
  end-page: 127
  article-title: Proportional hazards regression based on biased samples and estimated selection probabilities
  publication-title: Can J Stat
– volume: 20
  start-page: 69
  year: 2001
  end-page: 83
  article-title: A positive analysis of financial incentives for cadaveric organ transplantation
  publication-title: J Health Econo
– volume: 2
  start-page: 701
  year: 2002
  end-page: 711
  article-title: Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1257
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1261
  article-title: Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on the use of expanded criteria donor kidneys
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1614
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1617
  article-title: Public education and organ donation
  publication-title: Transplantation Proceedings
– volume: 6
  start-page: 2225
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2227
  article-title: It is time to re‐think the ‘Extended Criteria’
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1689
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1695
  article-title: The expanded criteria donor policy: An evaluation of program objectives and indirect ramifications
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 73
  start-page: 1361
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1367
  article-title: Financial incentives for cadaver organ donation: an ethical reappraisal
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 74
  start-page: 1281
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1286
  article-title: Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1329
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1344
  article-title: Using a Standardized Donation Ratio to Assess the Performance of Organ Procurement Organizations
  publication-title: Health Serv Res
– volume: 7
  start-page: 307
  issue: suppl 2
  year: 2007
  article-title: Kidney donor risk index [abstract]
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 74
  start-page: 1281
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib9
  article-title: Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors
  publication-title: Transplantation
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-200211150-00014
– ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib1
– ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib2
– volume: 20
  start-page: 69
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib8
  article-title: A positive analysis of financial incentives for cadaveric organ transplantation
  publication-title: J Health Econo
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00065-5
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1689
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib11
  article-title: The expanded criteria donor policy: An evaluation of program objectives and indirect ramifications
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01390.x
– volume: 7
  start-page: 307
  issue: suppl 2
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib13
  article-title: Kidney donor risk index [abstract]
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 2
  start-page: 701
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib14
  article-title: Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20804.x
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1614
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib4
  article-title: Public education and organ donation
  publication-title: Transplantation Proceedings
  doi: 10.1016/S0041-1345(97)82536-5
– volume: 36
  start-page: 111
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib10
  article-title: Proportional hazards regression based on biased samples and estimated selection probabilities
  publication-title: Can J Stat
  doi: 10.1002/cjs.5550360111
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1162
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib15
  article-title: Matching does not improve outcome from aged marginal kidney donors
  publication-title: Transplant Proc
  doi: 10.1016/S0041-1345(00)02443-X
– ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib6
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1257
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib3
  article-title: Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on the use of expanded criteria donor kidneys
  publication-title: Transplantation
  doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000161225.89368.81
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1329
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib5
  article-title: Using a Standardized Donation Ratio to Assess the Performance of Organ Procurement Organizations
  publication-title: Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00212
– volume: 73
  start-page: 1361
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib7
  article-title: Financial incentives for cadaver organ donation: an ethical reappraisal
  publication-title: Transplantation
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-200204270-00034
– volume: 6
  start-page: 2225
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02937.x_bib12
  article-title: It is time to re-think the ‘Extended Criteria’
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01506.x
SSID ssj0017282
Score 2.0532093
Snippet We investigated the effect of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) label on (i) recovery of kidneys and (ii) acceptance for transplantation given recovery. An ECD...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 304
SubjectTerms Biological and medical sciences
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Expanded criteria donors
Humans
Kidney - surgery
kidney transplantation
Medical sciences
Names
Probability
Registries
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the urinary system
Tissue Donors - statistics & numerical data
utilization
Title Efficient Utilization of the Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Deceased Donor Kidney Pool: An Analysis of the Effect of Labeling
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1600-6143.2009.02937.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20055795
https://www.proquest.com/docview/733912642
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4456011
Volume 10
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3da9swEBejT4OxbuzL7Rr0sIf1ISGyLMvaW0hSSvfBKA30zUiWREODHZoEutI_vney49VbH0rpm7_O2Oc763fS3e8I-eJ8rDJM1YmFVRCg6GHfpG7Y16mOcRkp86HX4c9f6fEsOTkX503-E9bC1PwQ7YQbekb4X6ODa7PqOjkM1hD6JLyhnYSRSw4QTzKeIo3-5LRlksIuTGHhsxbhopvU8-CNOiPVq6VegdJ83e3iITj6f1blfbQbhqujXXK5fdE6S-VysFmbQXHzDwfk82jiDXndoFo6qs3wLXnhynfkdhroKeA56Ww9XzQFn7TyFEAnnV4vcf7aUmy2gG5AJ1VZXdGv0_HkkE5cgetGtjn4fW5L94f-rqrFNzoq6ZZKpb1ZyErBvR_ahAr792R2ND0bH_ebZg_9QmCpohfCM6SCcQbMxCvjuc1S4YWyXhrHYusADAqpvNfDJPHGOp4JwyT3SsVmyD-QnbIq3SdCRSGYLayOQSrhWhuIiaSTqZKCSZNlEZHbD5sXDRM6NuRY5PciItBojhrFPp0qDxrNryPCWsllzQbyCJlex3ZaQQBPMVYOR4RujSkH38YFG126arPKJeeKAWKNI_Kxtq2_woE8TYGw7FhdewHShnfPlPOLQB-eJBiFs4ikwage_SL56OQMt_aeKrhPXta5F5gM9JnsrK827gAg3dr0grPeAd--O7Q
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3da9swEBeje9hg7IN9ed06Pexhe0iILcuy9haalKxNyxgJ9E1IlkTDgh3aBLrRP353suPVbR_K2Ju_ztjnO-t30t3vCPnkfCJzTNVJuJUQoOhBz2Ru0NOZTnAZKfeh1-HxSTaZp4en_LRpB4S1MDU_RDvhhp4R_tfo4Dgh3fVyGK0h9klZwzsJQ5foA6B8mALuwEhs9KPlksI-TGHps5ZhvJvWc-edOmPVk5W-ALX5ut_FXYD0dl7ldbwbBqyDZ2S5fdU6T-Vnf7M2_eL3DRbI_6SL5-RpA2zpsLbEF-SBK1-Sq3FgqIAHpfP1YtnUfNLKU8CddHy5wilsS7HfAnoCHVVldU4_j_dHX-jIFbh0ZJuDRwtbul_0e1Utv9JhSbdsKu3NQmIK7k21CUX2r8j8YDzbn_Safg-9gmO1oufcx8gG4wxYipfGM5tn3HNpvTAuTqwDPMiF9F4P0tQb61jOTSyYlzIxA_aa7JRV6d4Sygse28LqBKRSprWBsEg4kUnBY2HyPCJi-2VV0ZChY0-OpboWFIFGFWoUW3VKFTSqLiMSt5KrmhDkHjJ7HeNpBQE_JVg8HBG6tSYF7o1rNrp01eZCCcZkDKA1icib2rj-Cgf-NAnComN27QXIHN49Uy7OAoN4mmIgHkckC1Z17xdRw8MZbr37V8GP5NFkdjxV028nR7vkcZ2KgblB78nO-nzjPgDCW5u94Ll_AJ7rP9M
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3da9swEBelgzIYW8u-vLWdHvawPSTElmVZewtNQtd2pYwG-iYkS2KhwQ5tAt3YH7872XHrrQ9l9M1fZ-zznfU76e53hHx0PpE5puok3EoIUPSgZzI36OlMJ7iMlPvQ6_DbaXY4TY8u-EWT_4S1MDU_RDvhhp4R_tfo4Avru04OgzWEPilraCdh5BJ9wJNP0gyABQKk7y2VFLZhCiuftQzj3ayee-_UGaqeLfQ1aM3X7S7uw6P_plXehbthvJq8IJfrN63TVC77q6XpF7_-IoF8HFVsk-cNrKXD2g53yIYrX5Lf48BPAc9Jp8vZvKn4pJWngDrp-GaBE9iWYrcF9AM6qsrqin4aH4w-05ErcOHINgePZ7Z0P-lZVc2_0GFJ11wq7c1CWgrunWgTSuxfkelkfH5w2Gu6PfQKjrWKnnMfIxeMM2AnXhrPbJ5xz6X1wrg4sQ7QIBfSez1IU2-sYzk3sWBeysQM2GuyWVale0soL3hsC6sTkEqZ1gaCIuFEJgWPhcnziIj1h1VFQ4WOHTnm6k5IBBpVqFFs1ClV0Ki6iUjcSi5qOpAHyOx3bKcVBPSUYOlwROjamBQ4N67Y6NJVq2slGJMxQNYkIm9q27oVDuxpEoRFx-raC5A3vHumnP0I_OFpimF4HJEsGNWDX0QNj85x693_Cn4gW2ejiTr5enr8njyt8zAwMWiXbC6vVm4P4N3S7Ae__QOa1T6C
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficient+utilization+of+the+expanded+criteria+donor+%28ECD%29+deceased+donor+kidney+pool%3A+an+analysis+of+the+effect+of+labeling&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+transplantation&rft.au=Hirth%2C+R+A&rft.au=Pan%2C+Q&rft.au=Schaubel%2C+D+E&rft.au=Merion%2C+R+M&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.issn=1600-6143&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1600-6143.2009.02937.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1600-6135&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1600-6135&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1600-6135&client=summon