The Nature, Distribution and Causes of Traumatic Brain Injury

The identification and interpretation of brain damage resulting from a non‐missile head injury is often not easy with the result that the most obvious structural damage identified postmortem may not be the most important in trying to establish clinico‐pathological correlations. For example patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 397 - 406
Main Authors Graham, D.I., Adams, J. Hume, Nicoll, J.A.R., Maxwell, W.L., Gennarelli, T.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.1995
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The identification and interpretation of brain damage resulting from a non‐missile head injury is often not easy with the result that the most obvious structural damage identified postmortem may not be the most important in trying to establish clinico‐pathological correlations. For example patients with a fracture of the skull, quite severe cerebral contusions or a large intracranial haematoma that is successfully treated can make an uneventful and complete recovery if no other types of brain damage are present. However, not infrequently more subtle forms of pathology are present and ones that can only be identified microscopically. A systematic and pragmatic approach through the autopsy is therefore required and one that recognises the need for tissue to be retained in ways that are appropriate for cellular and molecular studies.
Bibliography:istex:E2D73A34BE98C23B4BB45C0E1FAA91200205449D
ArticleID:BPA397
ark:/67375/WNG-GC4T9FPN-0
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1015-6305
1750-3639
DOI:10.1111/j.1750-3639.1995.tb00618.x