The Role of Execution Noise in Movement Variability

• Published in: Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 91; no. 2; pp. 1050 - 1063
• Main Authors: van Beers, Robert J, Haggard, Patrick, Wolpert, Daniel M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Am Phys Soc 01.02.2004
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Arm - physiology; Biomechanical Phenomena - methods; Electricity; Female; Humans; Male; Movement - physiology; Photic Stimulation - methods; Psychomotor Performance - physiology
• DOI: 10.1152/jn.00652.2003
• ISSN: 0022-3077

1 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR; 2 Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; and 3 Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands Submitted 8 July 2003; accepted in final form 10 October 2003 The origin of variability in goal-directed movements is not well understood. Variability can originate from several neural processes such as target localization, movement planning, and movement execution. Here we examine variability resulting from noise in movement execution. In several experiments, subjects moved their unseen hand to visual targets, under conditions which were designed to minimize the variability expected from localization and planning processes. We tested short movements in 32 directions in a center-out reaching task. The variability in the movement endpoints and in the initial movement direction varied systematically with the movement direction, with some directions having up to twice the variability of others. In a second experiment we tested four movements in the same direction but with different extents. Here, the longer movements were systematically curved, and the endpoint ellipses were not aligned with the straight line between starting and end position, but they were roughly aligned with the last part of the trajectory. We show that the variability observed in these experiments cannot be explained by planning noise but is well explained by noise in movement execution. A combination of both signal-dependent and signal-independent noise in the amplitude of the motor commands and temporal noise in their duration can explain the observed variability. Our results suggest that, in general, execution noise accounts for at least a large proportion of movement variability. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. J. van Beers, Dept. of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands (E-mail: r.vanbeers{at}erasmusmc.nl ).