Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential and benign leiomyoma

Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast‐enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyoma. Materials and Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 43; no. 2; pp. 333 - 342
Main Authors Lin, Gigin, Yang, Lan-Yan, Huang, Yu-Ting, Ng, Koon-Kwan, Ng, Shu-Hang, Ueng, Shir-Hwa, Chao, Angel, Yen, Tzu-Chen, Chang, Ting-Chang, Lai, Chyong-Huey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI10.1002/jmri.24998

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast‐enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyoma. Materials and Methods A consecutive cohort of 8 LMS/STUMP and 25 benign leiomyomas underwent pelvic MRI exam at 3T. Two radiologists independently evaluated images based on CE‐MRI (central nonenhancement at equilibrial phase) and DWI (hyperintensity on b = 1000 s/mm2 and hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficients [ADC] map). The ADC values were calculated from b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2. Results CE‐MRI yielded a significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (0.94 vs. 0.52) and a significantly higher specificity (0.96 vs. 0.36) than DWI (P < 0.05 for both), and remained a comparably high sensitivity as DWI (0.88 vs. 1.00). A combination of DWI and ADC value <1.08 × 10−3 mm2/s (determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis) improved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of DWI to 0.88, 0.88, and 0.88, respectively, by post‐hoc analysis based on the same study cohort. Conclusion For prospective differentiation between uterine LMS/STUMP and benign leiomyoma, CE‐MRI can provide accurate information and is preferable to DWI. Combination of DWI and ADC values can achieve a comparable diagnostic accuracy to CE‐MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:333–342.
AbstractList Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyoma. Materials and Methods A consecutive cohort of 8 LMS/STUMP and 25 benign leiomyomas underwent pelvic MRI exam at 3T. Two radiologists independently evaluated images based on CE-MRI (central nonenhancement at equilibrial phase) and DWI (hyperintensity on b = 1000 s/mm2 and hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficients [ADC] map). The ADC values were calculated from b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2. Results CE-MRI yielded a significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (0.94 vs. 0.52) and a significantly higher specificity (0.96 vs. 0.36) than DWI (P < 0.05 for both), and remained a comparably high sensitivity as DWI (0.88 vs. 1.00). A combination of DWI and ADC value <1.08 × 10-3 mm2/s (determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis) improved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of DWI to 0.88, 0.88, and 0.88, respectively, by post-hoc analysis based on the same study cohort. Conclusion For prospective differentiation between uterine LMS/STUMP and benign leiomyoma, CE-MRI can provide accurate information and is preferable to DWI. Combination of DWI and ADC values can achieve a comparable diagnostic accuracy to CE-MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:333-342.
PURPOSETo compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyoma.MATERIALS AND METHODSA consecutive cohort of 8 LMS/STUMP and 25 benign leiomyomas underwent pelvic MRI exam at 3T. Two radiologists independently evaluated images based on CE-MRI (central nonenhancement at equilibrial phase) and DWI (hyperintensity on b = 1000 s/mm2 and hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficients [ADC] map). The ADC values were calculated from b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2 .RESULTSCE-MRI yielded a significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (0.94 vs. 0.52) and a significantly higher specificity (0.96 vs. 0.36) than DWI (P < 0.05 for both), and remained a comparably high sensitivity as DWI (0.88 vs. 1.00). A combination of DWI and ADC value <1.08 × 10(-3) mm2 /s (determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis) improved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of DWI to 0.88, 0.88, and 0.88, respectively, by post-hoc analysis based on the same study cohort.CONCLUSIONFor prospective differentiation between uterine LMS/STUMP and benign leiomyoma, CE-MRI can provide accurate information and is preferable to DWI. Combination of DWI and ADC values can achieve a comparable diagnostic accuracy to CE-MRI.
Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast‐enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyoma. Materials and Methods A consecutive cohort of 8 LMS/STUMP and 25 benign leiomyomas underwent pelvic MRI exam at 3T. Two radiologists independently evaluated images based on CE‐MRI (central nonenhancement at equilibrial phase) and DWI (hyperintensity on b = 1000 s/mm2 and hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficients [ADC] map). The ADC values were calculated from b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2. Results CE‐MRI yielded a significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (0.94 vs. 0.52) and a significantly higher specificity (0.96 vs. 0.36) than DWI (P < 0.05 for both), and remained a comparably high sensitivity as DWI (0.88 vs. 1.00). A combination of DWI and ADC value <1.08 × 10−3 mm2/s (determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis) improved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of DWI to 0.88, 0.88, and 0.88, respectively, by post‐hoc analysis based on the same study cohort. Conclusion For prospective differentiation between uterine LMS/STUMP and benign leiomyoma, CE‐MRI can provide accurate information and is preferable to DWI. Combination of DWI and ADC values can achieve a comparable diagnostic accuracy to CE‐MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:333–342.
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyoma. A consecutive cohort of 8 LMS/STUMP and 25 benign leiomyomas underwent pelvic MRI exam at 3T. Two radiologists independently evaluated images based on CE-MRI (central nonenhancement at equilibrial phase) and DWI (hyperintensity on b = 1000 s/mm2 and hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficients [ADC] map). The ADC values were calculated from b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2 . CE-MRI yielded a significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (0.94 vs. 0.52) and a significantly higher specificity (0.96 vs. 0.36) than DWI (P < 0.05 for both), and remained a comparably high sensitivity as DWI (0.88 vs. 1.00). A combination of DWI and ADC value <1.08 × 10(-3) mm2 /s (determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis) improved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of DWI to 0.88, 0.88, and 0.88, respectively, by post-hoc analysis based on the same study cohort. For prospective differentiation between uterine LMS/STUMP and benign leiomyoma, CE-MRI can provide accurate information and is preferable to DWI. Combination of DWI and ADC values can achieve a comparable diagnostic accuracy to CE-MRI.
Author Huang, Yu-Ting
Lin, Gigin
Ng, Shu-Hang
Yen, Tzu-Chen
Yang, Lan-Yan
Chang, Ting-Chang
Lai, Chyong-Huey
Chao, Angel
Ng, Koon-Kwan
Ueng, Shir-Hwa
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Gigin
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Gigin
  organization: Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Lan-Yan
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Lan-Yan
  organization: Clinical Trial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yu-Ting
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Yu-Ting
  organization: Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Koon-Kwan
  surname: Ng
  fullname: Ng, Koon-Kwan
  organization: Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Shu-Hang
  surname: Ng
  fullname: Ng, Shu-Hang
  organization: Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Shir-Hwa
  surname: Ueng
  fullname: Ueng, Shir-Hwa
  organization: Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Angel
  surname: Chao
  fullname: Chao, Angel
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Tzu-Chen
  surname: Yen
  fullname: Yen, Tzu-Chen
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Center for Advanced Molecular Imaging and Translation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Ting-Chang
  surname: Chang
  fullname: Chang, Ting-Chang
  email: tinchang.chang@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Chyong-Huey
  surname: Lai
  fullname: Lai, Chyong-Huey
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26383110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kt1u1DAQhSNURH_ghgdAlrhBSGntZBPHl7BAabUFgUBcWhNnsuslthfb0bIPy7vg_etFhbiyNfOdMyOdOc9OrLOYZc8ZvWSUFldL4_VlMRGieZSdsaoo8qJq6pP0p1WZs4by0-w8hCWlVIhJ9SQ7LeqyKRmjZ9mfqTMr8Do4S1xP4gJJp2FuXYhaEVBq9KA225ZyNnoIMUe7AKuwI3dfbwjYLgn6fgza2XyNer6Ih5a2B7u-R482aoiJIS3GNaIlY0SvLZIBtTMbF8ArZ4BckWCciwtixqAGJHE0zpO1TpUxTfURkq-BQc8t2EhWLu6sh90mLdpUP1oaeJo97mEI-OzwXmTfP7z_Nv2Yzz5f30zfzHJVUdbkHZQt1B0yVtcciq5XnHdClKj6um2AY18VpWLIJgisROgY41wINkk9XlEsL7JXe9-Vd79GDFEaHRQOA1h0Y5CM17ThKQ2R0JcP0KUbvU3bJariomK03lIvDtTYGuzkymsDfiOPwSXg9R5Q3oXgsb9HGJXbq5Dbq5C7q0gwfQArHXdppET18G8J20vWesDNf8zlbcr6qMn3Gh0i_r7XgP8pa17ySv74dC1n4h19O2VfJCv_AvSd3t0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_024_04704_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2020_05_040
crossref_primary_10_2147_IJWH_S388278
crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000002334
crossref_primary_10_1080_02656736_2024_2418426
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13071223
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11547_023_01654_1
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000019166
crossref_primary_10_3348_kjr_2023_0760
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2016_04_033
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40644_019_0206_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1343533
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20210283
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare7040158
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_02_038
crossref_primary_10_1111_jog_13694
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11604_021_01096_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_022_03431_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_021_03263_w
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20200483
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_17_18605
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0266462318000168
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11604_021_01217_2
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20201332
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14010088
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_021_03126_4
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_021_08113_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2022_08_144
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000034452
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14131438
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_606X_22_05126_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gore_2023_101306
crossref_primary_10_3390_surgeries4030041
crossref_primary_10_3802_jgo_2024_35_e24
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2024_109556
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2020191658
crossref_primary_10_5180_jsgoe_37_1_135
crossref_primary_10_5334_jbsr_2275
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_020_02734_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_081X_19_42006_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2023_111217
crossref_primary_10_1097_RUQ_0000000000000454
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40944_024_00855_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2018_05_015
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14143517
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07678_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_017_1076_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crwh_2022_e00386
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_25981
crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_7890241
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_24_31280
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcl_2023_02_008
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59081371
crossref_primary_10_1148_rg_220161
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_022_03545_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2019_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_8880080
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_14579
crossref_primary_10_12677_acm_2024_1482398
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2018_11_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2020_09_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2022_08_003
crossref_primary_10_11648_j_ijcocr_20240904_11
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2017_02_019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_017_1208_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejro_2021_100328
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_1069654
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2020_11_115
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40644_019_0247_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_021_03132_6
crossref_primary_10_3892_mco_2019_1797
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_016_0924_3
crossref_primary_10_3348_kjr_2018_0090
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13081404
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2018_10_010
crossref_primary_10_3348_jksr_2021_0116
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2020_109406
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13216443
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_211658
crossref_primary_10_1097_RCT_0000000000000565
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20210115
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14184468
crossref_primary_10_1097_RCT_0000000000001656
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics10100735
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2017_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000019787
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2022_09_019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40944_025_00967_5
crossref_primary_10_5387_fms_23_00018
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00438_024_02184_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diii_2019_07_007
crossref_primary_10_1089_gyn_2019_0037
crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2023_005220
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpet_2017_11_002
crossref_primary_10_25259_JCIS_24_2021
crossref_primary_10_1159_000494299
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_26630
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_024_04198_8
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0000000000000612
crossref_primary_10_1097_CCO_0000000000000758
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2023_107319
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2018_01_002
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.02.020
10.1007/s00330-009-1471-x
10.1097/00000478-199406000-00001
10.1148/rg.236035033
10.1148/radiol.11102340
10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234695
10.1016/0002-9378(90)91298-Q
10.1148/radiol.2503080874
10.1148/radiology.158.2.3753623
10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01086.x
10.1002/jmri.20207
10.1055/s-0030-1251477
10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.028
10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc04s131
10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.005
10.1007/s00330-013-2819-9
10.2214/ajr.177.6.1771307
10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.12.029
10.1016/j.acra.2011.03.008
10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811369
10.1007/s00330-007-0787-7
10.1007/s00261-012-9919-x
10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70226-8
10.2214/AJR.11.7287
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.07.002
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
– notice: 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7TK
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1002/jmri.24998
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1522-2586
EndPage 342
ExternalDocumentID 3925188561
26383110
10_1002_jmri_24998
JMRI24998
ark_67375_WNG_L9D0BC1Q_1
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Chang Gung Medical Foundation
  funderid: CMRPG‐370444 ; 290262
– fundername: National Science Council, Taiwan
  funderid: NSC100‐2325‐B‐182‐008 ; NSC 103‐2314‐B‐182A‐006 ; NMRPD1A0842. IRB 97‐2366B.
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
24P
31~
33P
3O-
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HBH
HDBZQ
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M65
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RGB
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RWI
RX1
RYL
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TWZ
UB1
V2E
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XV2
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AFWVQ
ALVPJ
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7TK
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5018-da3ba6de11667a2dfc77d993ecf6b8a7ef523c1e14ea13ead117799148a7750e3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1053-1807
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 00:42:47 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 13 03:48:20 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:59:20 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:56:33 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:57:21 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:46:18 EST 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:55:20 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords diagnostic accuracy
magnetic resonance imaging
diffusion-weighted imaging
uterine sarcoma
contrast enhancement
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5018-da3ba6de11667a2dfc77d993ecf6b8a7ef523c1e14ea13ead117799148a7750e3
Notes National Science Council, Taiwan - No. NSC100-2325-B-182-008; No. NSC 103-2314-B-182A-006; No. NMRPD1A0842. IRB 97-2366B.
ArticleID:JMRI24998
Chang Gung Medical Foundation - No. CMRPG-370444; No. 290262
ark:/67375/WNG-L9D0BC1Q-1
istex:C64F46F9B033AEE89ABD839673C64CC8577E36A6
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/jmri.24998
PMID 26383110
PQID 1757951069
PQPubID 1006400
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1760870539
proquest_journals_1757951069
pubmed_primary_26383110
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_24998
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jmri_24998
wiley_primary_10_1002_jmri_24998_JMRI24998
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_L9D0BC1Q_1
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate February 2016
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2016
  text: February 2016
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Nashville
PublicationSubtitle JMRI
PublicationTitle Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
PublicationTitleAlternate J. Magn. Reson. Imaging
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Jacobs I, Shepherd JH, Oram DH, Reznek RH. MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1307-1311.
Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. CT and MRI of uterine sarcomas and their mimickers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1369-1374.
Cornfeld D, Israel G, Martel M, Weinreb J, Schwartz P, McCarthy S. MRI appearance of mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:241-249.
Hricak H, Tscholakoff D, Heinrichs L, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms. Radiology 1986;158:385-391.
Wang Y, Alkasab TK, Narin O, et al. Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after adoption of restrictive gadolinium-based contrast agent guidelines. Radiology 2011;260:105-111.
Amant F, Coosemans A, Debiec-Rychter M, Timmerman D, Vergote I. Clinical management of uterine sarcomas. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:1188-1198.
Thomassin-Naggara I, Dechoux S, Bonneau C, et al. How to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours using MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2013;23:2306-2314.
Gupta JK, Sinha AS, Lumsden MA, Hickey M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD005073.
Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I, et al. Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 1999;19(Spec No):S131-145.
Brooks SE, Zhan M, Cote T, Baquet CR. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis of 2677 cases of uterine sarcoma 1989-1999. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:204-208.
Kido A, Togashi K, Koyama T, Yamaoka T, Fujiwara T, Fujii S. Diffusely enlarged uterus: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiographics 2003;23:1423-1439.
Goto A, Takeuchi S, Sugimura K, Maruo T. Usefulness of Gd-DTPA contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI and serum determination of LDH and its isozymes in the differential diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma from degenerated leiomyoma of the uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002;12:354-361.
Tirumani SH, Ojili V, Shanbhogue AK, Fasih N, Ryan JG, Reinhold C. Current concepts in the imaging of uterine sarcoma. Abdom Imaging 2013;38:397-411.
Lin G, Ng KK, Chang CJ, et al. Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2009;250:784-792.
Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Awai K, et al. Combined use of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted 3-T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2756-2764.
Leibsohn S, d'Ablaing G, Mishell DR Jr, Schlaerth JB. Leiomyosarcoma in a series of hysterectomies performed for presumed uterine leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:968-974; discussion 974-966.
Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Okamoto Y, Yoshikawa H. Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential and leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: MR findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:998-1007.
Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T, et al. The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 2008;18:723-730.
Sato K, Yuasa N, Fujita M, Fukushima Y. Clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging for preoperative differentiation between uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:368 e361-368.
Laughlin SK, Schroeder JC, Baird DD. New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Semin Reprod Med 2010;28:204-217.
Metwally M, Cheong YC, Horne AW. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD003857.
Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M, et al. Hyperintense uterine leiomyoma at T2-weighted MR imaging: differentiation with dynamic enhanced MR imaging and clinical implications. Radiology 1993;189:721-725.
Wu TI, Yen TC, Lai CH. Clinical presentation and diagnosis of uterine sarcoma, including imaging. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011;25:681-689.
Guntupalli SR, Ramirez PT, Anderson ML, Milam MR, Bodurka DC, Malpica A. Uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: a retrospective analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:324-326.
Kim HS, Baik JH, Pham LD, Jacobs MA. MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata: long-term outcomes. Acad Radiol 2011;18:970-976.
Shah SH, Jagannathan JP, Krajewski K, O'Regan KN, George S, Ramaiya NH. Uterine sarcomas: then and now. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:213-223.
Bell SW, Kempson RL, Hendrickson MR. Problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1994;18:535-558.
2004; 20
1986; 158
2013; 23
2008; 18
2002; 12
2009; 113
2006
2009; 250
2014; 210
2012; 11
2011; 18
1993; 189
1990; 162
2001; 177
2012; 199
2009; 10
2004; 93
2013; 38
1999; 19
2010; 28
2003; 181
1994; 18
1981
2011; 25
2009; 19
2011; 260
2010; 74
2003; 23
e_1_2_6_10_1
e_1_2_6_19_1
e_1_2_6_13_1
e_1_2_6_14_1
e_1_2_6_11_1
e_1_2_6_12_1
e_1_2_6_17_1
e_1_2_6_15_1
e_1_2_6_16_1
Fleiss JL (e_1_2_6_21_1) 1981
Metwally M (e_1_2_6_7_1) 2012; 11
e_1_2_6_20_1
e_1_2_6_9_1
Gupta JK (e_1_2_6_8_1) 2006
e_1_2_6_5_1
e_1_2_6_4_1
e_1_2_6_6_1
e_1_2_6_25_1
e_1_2_6_24_1
e_1_2_6_3_1
e_1_2_6_23_1
e_1_2_6_2_1
e_1_2_6_22_1
e_1_2_6_29_1
Sato K (e_1_2_6_18_1) 2014; 210
e_1_2_6_28_1
e_1_2_6_27_1
e_1_2_6_26_1
References_xml – reference: Goto A, Takeuchi S, Sugimura K, Maruo T. Usefulness of Gd-DTPA contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI and serum determination of LDH and its isozymes in the differential diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma from degenerated leiomyoma of the uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002;12:354-361.
– reference: Guntupalli SR, Ramirez PT, Anderson ML, Milam MR, Bodurka DC, Malpica A. Uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: a retrospective analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:324-326.
– reference: Bell SW, Kempson RL, Hendrickson MR. Problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1994;18:535-558.
– reference: Amant F, Coosemans A, Debiec-Rychter M, Timmerman D, Vergote I. Clinical management of uterine sarcomas. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:1188-1198.
– reference: Tirumani SH, Ojili V, Shanbhogue AK, Fasih N, Ryan JG, Reinhold C. Current concepts in the imaging of uterine sarcoma. Abdom Imaging 2013;38:397-411.
– reference: Wang Y, Alkasab TK, Narin O, et al. Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after adoption of restrictive gadolinium-based contrast agent guidelines. Radiology 2011;260:105-111.
– reference: Kim HS, Baik JH, Pham LD, Jacobs MA. MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata: long-term outcomes. Acad Radiol 2011;18:970-976.
– reference: Wu TI, Yen TC, Lai CH. Clinical presentation and diagnosis of uterine sarcoma, including imaging. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011;25:681-689.
– reference: Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I, et al. Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 1999;19(Spec No):S131-145.
– reference: Leibsohn S, d'Ablaing G, Mishell DR Jr, Schlaerth JB. Leiomyosarcoma in a series of hysterectomies performed for presumed uterine leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:968-974; discussion 974-966.
– reference: Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Jacobs I, Shepherd JH, Oram DH, Reznek RH. MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1307-1311.
– reference: Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M, et al. Hyperintense uterine leiomyoma at T2-weighted MR imaging: differentiation with dynamic enhanced MR imaging and clinical implications. Radiology 1993;189:721-725.
– reference: Laughlin SK, Schroeder JC, Baird DD. New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Semin Reprod Med 2010;28:204-217.
– reference: Shah SH, Jagannathan JP, Krajewski K, O'Regan KN, George S, Ramaiya NH. Uterine sarcomas: then and now. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:213-223.
– reference: Brooks SE, Zhan M, Cote T, Baquet CR. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis of 2677 cases of uterine sarcoma 1989-1999. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:204-208.
– reference: Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T, et al. The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 2008;18:723-730.
– reference: Hricak H, Tscholakoff D, Heinrichs L, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms. Radiology 1986;158:385-391.
– reference: Thomassin-Naggara I, Dechoux S, Bonneau C, et al. How to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours using MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2013;23:2306-2314.
– reference: Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. CT and MRI of uterine sarcomas and their mimickers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1369-1374.
– reference: Kido A, Togashi K, Koyama T, Yamaoka T, Fujiwara T, Fujii S. Diffusely enlarged uterus: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiographics 2003;23:1423-1439.
– reference: Gupta JK, Sinha AS, Lumsden MA, Hickey M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD005073.
– reference: Cornfeld D, Israel G, Martel M, Weinreb J, Schwartz P, McCarthy S. MRI appearance of mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:241-249.
– reference: Sato K, Yuasa N, Fujita M, Fukushima Y. Clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging for preoperative differentiation between uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:368 e361-368.
– reference: Metwally M, Cheong YC, Horne AW. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD003857.
– reference: Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
– reference: Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Awai K, et al. Combined use of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted 3-T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2756-2764.
– reference: Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Okamoto Y, Yoshikawa H. Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential and leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: MR findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:998-1007.
– reference: Lin G, Ng KK, Chang CJ, et al. Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2009;250:784-792.
– start-page: CD005073
  year: 2006
  article-title: Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 74
  start-page: 241
  year: 2010
  end-page: 249
  article-title: MRI appearance of mesenchymal tumors of the uterus
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1423
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1439
  article-title: Diffusely enlarged uterus: evaluation with MR imaging
  publication-title: Radiographics
– volume: 260
  start-page: 105
  year: 2011
  end-page: 111
  article-title: Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after adoption of restrictive gadolinium‐based contrast agent guidelines
  publication-title: Radiology
– year: 1981
– volume: 18
  start-page: 723
  year: 2008
  end-page: 730
  article-title: The utility of diffusion‐weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
– volume: 11
  start-page: CD003857
  year: 2012
  article-title: Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 18
  start-page: 535
  year: 1994
  end-page: 558
  article-title: Problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases
  publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol
– volume: 250
  start-page: 784
  year: 2009
  end-page: 792
  article-title: Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted 3.0‐T MR imaging—initial experience
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 18
  start-page: 970
  year: 2011
  end-page: 976
  article-title: MR‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata: long‐term outcomes
  publication-title: Acad Radiol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 2756
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2764
  article-title: Combined use of T2‐weighted and diffusion‐weighted 3‐T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
– volume: 28
  start-page: 204
  year: 2010
  end-page: 217
  article-title: New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Semin Reprod Med
– volume: 113
  start-page: 324
  year: 2009
  end-page: 326
  article-title: Uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: a retrospective analysis
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 12
  start-page: 354
  year: 2002
  end-page: 361
  article-title: Usefulness of Gd‐DTPA contrast‐enhanced dynamic MRI and serum determination of LDH and its isozymes in the differential diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma from degenerated leiomyoma of the uterus
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer
– volume: 199
  start-page: 213
  year: 2012
  end-page: 223
  article-title: Uterine sarcomas: then and now
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 20
  start-page: 998
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1007
  article-title: Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential and leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: MR findings
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
– volume: 93
  start-page: 204
  year: 2004
  end-page: 208
  article-title: Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis of 2677 cases of uterine sarcoma 1989–1999
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2306
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2314
  article-title: How to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours using MR imaging
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
– volume: 19
  start-page: S131
  issue: Spec No
  year: 1999
  end-page: 145
  article-title: Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds
  publication-title: Radiographics
– volume: 158
  start-page: 385
  year: 1986
  end-page: 391
  article-title: Uterine leiomyomas: correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 38
  start-page: 397
  year: 2013
  end-page: 411
  article-title: Current concepts in the imaging of uterine sarcoma
  publication-title: Abdom Imaging
– volume: 177
  start-page: 1307
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1311
  article-title: MR imaging of uterine sarcomas
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 210
  start-page: 368
  year: 2014
  article-title: Clinical application of diffusion‐weighted imaging for preoperative differentiation between uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 181
  start-page: 1369
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1374
  article-title: CT and MRI of uterine sarcomas and their mimickers
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 162
  start-page: 968
  year: 1990
  end-page: 974
  article-title: Leiomyosarcoma in a series of hysterectomies performed for presumed uterine leiomyomas
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1188
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1198
  article-title: Clinical management of uterine sarcomas
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
– volume: 25
  start-page: 681
  year: 2011
  end-page: 689
  article-title: Clinical presentation and diagnosis of uterine sarcoma, including imaging
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 189
  start-page: 721
  year: 1993
  end-page: 725
  article-title: Hyperintense uterine leiomyoma at T2‐weighted MR imaging: differentiation with dynamic enhanced MR imaging and clinical implications
  publication-title: Radiology
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.02.020
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1471-x
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_1
  doi: 10.1097/00000478-199406000-00001
– ident: e_1_2_6_22_1
  doi: 10.1148/rg.236035033
– ident: e_1_2_6_29_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102340
– ident: e_1_2_6_13_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234695
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91298-Q
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2503080874
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3753623
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01086.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_12_1
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.20207
– volume: 11
  start-page: CD003857
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  article-title: Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
  doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251477
– volume: 210
  start-page: 368
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_6_18_1
  article-title: Clinical application of diffusion‐weighted imaging for preoperative differentiation between uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.028
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc04s131
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.005
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2819-9
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.177.6.1771307
– ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.12.029
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.03.008
– start-page: CD005073
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
  article-title: Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_1
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811369
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0787-7
– ident: e_1_2_6_28_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9919-x
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70226-8
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_1
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7287
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.07.002
– volume-title: Statistical methods for rates and proportions
  year: 1981
  ident: e_1_2_6_21_1
SSID ssj0009945
Score 2.4932623
Snippet Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast‐enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation...
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation between...
Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation...
PURPOSETo compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 333
SubjectTerms Adult
contrast enhancement
Contrast Media
Diagnosis, Differential
diagnostic accuracy
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
diffusion-weighted imaging
Female
Humans
Image Enhancement
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Leiomyoma - pathology
Leiomyosarcoma - pathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Smooth Muscle Tumor - pathology
Uterine Neoplasms - pathology
uterine sarcoma
Title Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential and benign leiomyoma
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-L9D0BC1Q-1/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjmri.24998
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26383110
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1757951069
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1760870539
Volume 43
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9RAFB5KBfHF-yVaZUQRFLKbyT3gi67WWtyCxWJfZDhzia7dJCUXtD75E_yL-ks8M8lmqRRB35bMyexJcs6Zb2a-OYeQhxCKQKW5clXqB26o0aUEeMrFsKBy4ekI7EHa-V68cxDuHkaHG-Tp6ixMnx9iXHAznmHjtXFwEM10nTT0c1EvJjh5yMxJX0PWMohof507KstshWLED4HLUi8Zc5P60_Wtp0ajc-bFfj0Lap5Grnbo2b5EPqyU7hknR5OuFRP57Y98jv_7VJfJxQGT0me9EV0hG7q8Ss7Ph133a-TnbCxWSKucImSkqmfo4Q0UpOxqkCemyRLfoWl_ff-hy0-WXEDn-68plIqaUiydWZvDxi92QXZoXJRDl32plrY3FjowyKipOYFq0KVeVMVJ1aBnVgXQKW2KCs2MFl2DWtO2K6qammVlikN1T3SgBc4yPhqqDz2uWtv10uoidInXV10WcJ0cbL98N9txh9IQrjQZCF0FgYBYacbiOAFf5TJJFEItLfNYpJDoHCfYkmkWamABeovZm0YoHGIbYiQd3CCbZVXqW4QyBlGiItC5UGGexhmAAC2UZCLHcAcOebwyES6HvOmmfMeS9xmffW6-GbffzCEPRtnjPlvImVKPrKWNIlAfGX5dEvH3e6_4m-yF93zG3nLmkK2VKfIhtDQc8V5iYHGcOeT-2IxBwez0QKmrzsjEHgbiKECZm70Jj3_mY8QNEPQ55Ik1xL8oynfRCuyv2_8ifIdcQFg5cNu3yGZbd_ouQrdW3LMu-hvqoEmC
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bbtNAEF1BKwEv3C-BAotASCA5ieP7I6SUtCSRqFrRt9Wsdw2hsV35IihPfAK_CF_CzNpxVFQhwVuUGW_W8czs2dnxHMaegSsdFSbKUuHIsVyNLiVhqCwMCyqRQ-2BeZF2Nvcnh-7ekXfU1ubQuzBNf4gu4UaeYeI1OTglpAfrrqGf02LRx91DFF5km0TpTQQG2_vr7lFRZDiKEUE4lh0Og6476WiwvvbMerRJf-3X88DmWexqFp-daw3Daml6FlLNyXG_rmQ__vZHR8f_vq_r7GoLS_mrxo5usAs6u8kuzdqD91vs57jjK-R5whE1ctUU6eEFHOK4LiA-JZGpfYey-vX9h84-mfoCPtvf5ZApTmwsNaXnUPjF5GRb4SJrh2zYWqrGXnhbRMaJdgKnwZd6kaeneYnOmafAB7xMc7Q0ntYlzppXdZoXnDLLHFfrptaBp7jR-EjVPvwkr8zQSzMXqTP8fjVkCrfZ4c6bg_HEatkhrJiaEFoKHAm-0rbt-wGMVBIHgUK0pePElyEEOsE9dmxr29VgO-gwdDyNaNhFGcIk7dxhG1me6XuM2zZ4gfJAJ1K5SehHABK0VLEtE4x40GMvVjYi4rZ1OjF4LEXT9Hkk6JkJ88x67Gmne9I0DDlX67kxtU4FimMqsQs88WH-Vkyj7eHrsf1e2D22tbJF0UaXUiDkCwgZ-1GPPenEGBfosAcyndek4w8xFnsO6txtbLj7sREGXQdxX4-9NJb4l4mKPbQC8-n-vyg_ZpcnB7OpmO7O3z1gVxBltqXuW2yjKmr9EJFcJR8Zf_0NMRZNnA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bbtNAEF2VVqp44X4JFFgEQgLJSdZ2fJF4gZTQliaCiqp9QatZ7xpCYzvyRVCe-AR-Eb6E2fUlKqqQ4C3KjDfj-Mzs2d3xDCGPwRWODGJpycB2LFehSwkYSgvDgozFUI3AvEg7nXk7h-7e8eh4jTxv34Wp60N0G27aM0y81g6-lPFgVTT0c5LP-7h4CIMLZMP10Fs0JTpYFY8KQ9OiGAmEY7Fg6HfFSe3B6toz09GG_me_nsc1z1JXM_dMLpMPrdV1yslJvypFP_r2R0HH_72tK-RSQ0rpixpFV8maSq-RzWlz7H6d_Bx33QppFlPkjFTWKXp4AYUoqnKITrXIZL5DUf76_kOln0x2AZ0e7FJIJdW9WCq9OYfCL2ZHthHO02bIuldLWaOFNilkVDedQDPoQs2z5DQr0DWzBOiAFkmGOKNJVaDVtKySLKd6X5niXF1nOtAElxkfda4PXWalGXphbBEqxe_bIRO4QQ4nr96Pd6ymN4QV6RKElgRHgCcVY57ngy3jyPclci0VxZ4IwFcxrrAjppirgDnoLvpwGrmwizIkScq5SdbTLFW3CWUMRr4cgYqFdOPACwEEKCEjJmKMd9AjT1uI8KgpnK77dyx4XfLZ5vqZcfPMeuRRp7usy4Wcq_XEIK1TgfxEJ9j5I340e833w-3hyzF7x1mPbLVQ5E1sKTgSPl_zYi_skYedGKOCPuqBVGWV1kGH8BH5qHOrhnD3YzaGXAdZX488M0D8i6F8D1FgPt35F-UHZPPt9oTv787e3CUXkWI2ee5bZL3MK3UPaVwp7htv_Q1JOExU
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+the+diagnostic+accuracy+of+contrast-enhanced+MRI+and+diffusion-weighted+MRI+in+the+differentiation+between+uterine+leiomyosarcoma+%2F+smooth+muscle+tumor+with+uncertain+malignant+potential+and+benign+leiomyoma&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+magnetic+resonance+imaging&rft.au=Lin%2C+Gigin&rft.au=Yang%2C+Lan-Yan&rft.au=Huang%2C+Yu-Ting&rft.au=Ng%2C+Koon-Kwan&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjmri.24998&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=3925188561
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon