Use of Research Interfaces for Psychophysical Studies With Cochlear-Implant Users

A growing number of laboratories are using research interfaces to conduct experiments with cochlear-implant (CI) users. Because these interfaces bypass a subject’s clinical sound processor, several concerns exist regarding safety and stimulation levels. Here we suggest best-practice approaches for h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTrends in hearing Vol. 21; p. 2331216517736464
Main Authors Litovsky, Ruth Y., Goupell, Matthew J., Kan, Alan, Landsberger, David M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2017
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2331-2165
2331-2165
DOI10.1177/2331216517736464

Cover

Abstract A growing number of laboratories are using research interfaces to conduct experiments with cochlear-implant (CI) users. Because these interfaces bypass a subject’s clinical sound processor, several concerns exist regarding safety and stimulation levels. Here we suggest best-practice approaches for how to safely and ethically perform this type of research and highlight areas of limited knowledge where further research is needed to help clarify safety limits. The article is designed to provide an introductory level of technical detail about the devices and the effects of electrical stimulation on perception and neurophysiology. From this, we summarize what should be the best practices in the field, based on the literature and our experience. Findings from the review of the literature suggest that there are three main safety concerns: (a) to prevent biological or neural damage, (b) to avoid presentation of uncomfortably loud sounds, and (c) to ensure that subjects have control over stimulus presentation. Researchers must pay close attention to the software–hardware interface to ensure that the three main safety concerns are closely monitored. An important area for future research will be the determination of the amount of biological damage that can occur from electrical stimulation from a CI placed in the cochlea, not in direct contact with neural tissue. As technology used in research with CIs evolve, some of these approaches may change. However, the three main safety principles outlined here are not anticipated to undergo change with technological advances.
AbstractList A growing number of laboratories are using research interfaces to conduct experiments with cochlear-implant (CI) users. Because these interfaces bypass a subject’s clinical sound processor, several concerns exist regarding safety and stimulation levels. Here we suggest best-practice approaches for how to safely and ethically perform this type of research and highlight areas of limited knowledge where further research is needed to help clarify safety limits. The article is designed to provide an introductory level of technical detail about the devices and the effects of electrical stimulation on perception and neurophysiology. From this, we summarize what should be the best practices in the field, based on the literature and our experience. Findings from the review of the literature suggest that there are three main safety concerns: (a) to prevent biological or neural damage, (b) to avoid presentation of uncomfortably loud sounds, and (c) to ensure that subjects have control over stimulus presentation. Researchers must pay close attention to the software–hardware interface to ensure that the three main safety concerns are closely monitored. An important area for future research will be the determination of the amount of biological damage that can occur from electrical stimulation from a CI placed in the cochlea, not in direct contact with neural tissue. As technology used in research with CIs evolve, some of these approaches may change. However, the three main safety principles outlined here are not anticipated to undergo change with technological advances.
A growing number of laboratories are using research interfaces to conduct experiments with cochlear-implant (CI) users. Because these interfaces bypass a subject's clinical sound processor, several concerns exist regarding safety and stimulation levels. Here we suggest best-practice approaches for how to safely and ethically perform this type of research and highlight areas of limited knowledge where further research is needed to help clarify safety limits. The article is designed to provide an introductory level of technical detail about the devices and the effects of electrical stimulation on perception and neurophysiology. From this, we summarize what should be the best practices in the field, based on the literature and our experience. Findings from the review of the literature suggest that there are three main safety concerns: (a) to prevent biological or neural damage, (b) to avoid presentation of uncomfortably loud sounds, and (c) to ensure that subjects have control over stimulus presentation. Researchers must pay close attention to the software-hardware interface to ensure that the three main safety concerns are closely monitored. An important area for future research will be the determination of the amount of biological damage that can occur from electrical stimulation from a CI placed in the cochlea, not in direct contact with neural tissue. As technology used in research with CIs evolve, some of these approaches may change. However, the three main safety principles outlined here are not anticipated to undergo change with technological advances.A growing number of laboratories are using research interfaces to conduct experiments with cochlear-implant (CI) users. Because these interfaces bypass a subject's clinical sound processor, several concerns exist regarding safety and stimulation levels. Here we suggest best-practice approaches for how to safely and ethically perform this type of research and highlight areas of limited knowledge where further research is needed to help clarify safety limits. The article is designed to provide an introductory level of technical detail about the devices and the effects of electrical stimulation on perception and neurophysiology. From this, we summarize what should be the best practices in the field, based on the literature and our experience. Findings from the review of the literature suggest that there are three main safety concerns: (a) to prevent biological or neural damage, (b) to avoid presentation of uncomfortably loud sounds, and (c) to ensure that subjects have control over stimulus presentation. Researchers must pay close attention to the software-hardware interface to ensure that the three main safety concerns are closely monitored. An important area for future research will be the determination of the amount of biological damage that can occur from electrical stimulation from a CI placed in the cochlea, not in direct contact with neural tissue. As technology used in research with CIs evolve, some of these approaches may change. However, the three main safety principles outlined here are not anticipated to undergo change with technological advances.
Author Landsberger, David M.
Litovsky, Ruth Y.
Kan, Alan
Goupell, Matthew J.
AuthorAffiliation 3 New York University School of Medicine, NY, USA
1 University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA
2 Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland-College Park, MD, USA
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland-College Park, MD, USA
– name: 3 New York University School of Medicine, NY, USA
– name: 1 University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ruth Y.
  surname: Litovsky
  fullname: Litovsky, Ruth Y.
  email: Litovsky@waisman.wisc.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Matthew J.
  surname: Goupell
  fullname: Goupell, Matthew J.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Alan
  surname: Kan
  fullname: Kan, Alan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: David M.
  surname: Landsberger
  fullname: Landsberger, David M.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29113579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kd1rFDEUxYNU7Id990nm0ZepSWby9SLIYnWhoK0WH0Mmc7OTZXayJhlh__tm3Vbagj6EXO6953fgnlN0NIUJEHpD8AUhQrynTUMo4azUDW95-wKd7Fv1vnf0qD5G5ymtMcaEMiY4fYWOqSKkYUKdoOvbBFVw1Q0kMNEO1XLKEJ2xkCoXYvUt7ewQtsMueWvG6nuee19GP30eqkWww1hU9XKzHc2Uq8KK6TV66cyY4Pz-P0O3l59-LL7UV18_Lxcfr2rLMM61sxJL58ASCpSpXhGheHmE8L7pnFVEcpC9FUK0kmLmBO-swLh3xhnFu-YMLQ_cPpi13ka_MXGng_H6TyPElTYxezuC7l2jqJRUso601JJOmla1PWbSdVBcC-vDgbWduw30FqYczfgE-nQy-UGvwm9d7tmSRhXAu3tADL9mSFlvfLIwlrNAmJMmxUUy2iheVt8-9vpr8pBJWeCHBRtDShGctj6b7MPe2o-aYL3PXz_PvwjxM-ED-z-S-iBJZgV6HeY4lcz-vX8Hb7S9Hw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165221129165
crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165231176157
crossref_primary_10_1109_TASLP_2023_3267608
crossref_primary_10_1177_2331216520956560
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_018_00707_x
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_0665_21_2021
crossref_primary_10_1121_1_5130384
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2021_3123241
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2023_3313198
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0016365
crossref_primary_10_1177_2331216520936160
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0002989
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13071917
crossref_primary_10_1121_1_5123464
crossref_primary_10_1177_2331216518807535
crossref_primary_10_1121_1_5070150
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0017603
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0019879
crossref_primary_10_1109_TCDS_2023_3275587
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci10060406
crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165211007367
crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165211061116
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2018_08_004
Cites_doi 10.1007/s10162-006-0064-5
10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004
10.1121/1.1937362
10.1097/00001756-199806010-00033
10.1159/000438742
10.1121/1.1394222
10.1007/s10162-006-0040-0
10.1121/1.2436712
10.1177/2331216515619763
10.1080/00016480802610218
10.1016/0378-5955(83)90115-6
10.1016/j.heares.2012.12.006
10.1007/BF02368010
10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181645336
10.1121/1.419611
10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00177-1
10.1007/BF02446202
10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046029
10.1007/s10162-013-0440-x
10.1121/1.2751258
10.1121/1.4862877
10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.006
10.1109/TBME.2013.2262712
10.1121/1.428448
10.1121/1.2258390
10.1121/1.4820889
10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.005
10.1121/1.1937228
10.1121/1.3613938
10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.021
10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.009
10.1109/10.126616
10.1121/1.426274
10.1007/BF02510526
10.1097/01.mao.0000281803.36574.bc
10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.006
10.1121/1.409835
10.1121/1.3290994
10.1121/1.3036175
10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.003
10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e1d19e
10.1121/1.1623785
10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.013
10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259984
10.1121/1.3257546
10.1016/j.heares.2012.02.011
10.1109/10.102812
10.1007/s10162-009-0175-x
10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.007
10.1121/1.398902
10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e1d15e
10.1126/science.8160013
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2017
The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2017
– notice: The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications
DBID AFRWT
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1177/2331216517736464
DatabaseName Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: AFRWT
  name: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
  url: http://journals.sagepub.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2331-2165
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_df39288285b142c1b8a494d058fbe961
PMC5764139
29113579
10_1177_2331216517736464
10.1177_2331216517736464
Genre Journal Article
Review
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
  grantid: R01DC003083; R01DC008365; R01DC012152; R01DC014948; R03DC015321
  funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100000055 10.13039/100000055 10.13039/100000055 10.13039/100000055 10.13039/100000055
– fundername: NICHD NIH HHS
  grantid: P30 HD003352
– fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DC003083
– fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DC014948
– fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS
  grantid: R03 DC015321
GroupedDBID 0R~
54M
5VS
7RV
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AANEX
AASGM
ABAWP
ABQXT
ABUWG
ABVFX
ACARO
ACDXX
ACGFS
ACROE
ADBBV
ADEBD
ADOGD
ADRAZ
AENEX
AERKM
AEUHG
AEWDL
AFCOW
AFKRA
AFKRG
AFRWT
AJUZI
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
ARTOV
AUTPY
AYAKG
BAWUL
BCNDV
BDDNI
BENPR
BPHCQ
BSEHC
BVXVI
CCPQU
DC.
DIK
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IPNFZ
J8X
K.F
KQ8
M48
M~E
NAPCQ
O9-
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
RIG
ROL
RPM
S01
SAUOL
SCDPB
SCNPE
SFC
SFH
SV3
UKHRP
AAYXX
ACHEB
CITATION
31X
AADTT
AATBZ
ABHQH
ACGZU
ACSBE
ACSIQ
AEUIJ
AEWHI
B8Z
CGR
CUY
CVF
DV7
ECM
EIF
M4V
NPM
OK1
RHX
SFK
SFT
SGV
SPJ
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-fc808ffec12e259d91796179116d3bfc9186e8dc77748205f76bc700dfafa96b3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2331-2165
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:10:42 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:13:15 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 13:17:40 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:34:08 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:27 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:24:10 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:36:37 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords research interface
cochlear implants
safety
Language English
License This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c500t-fc808ffec12e259d91796179116d3bfc9186e8dc77748205f76bc700dfafa96b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2331216517736464?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider
PMID 29113579
PQID 1961852396
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_df39288285b142c1b8a494d058fbe961
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5764139
proquest_miscellaneous_1961852396
pubmed_primary_29113579
crossref_citationtrail_10_1177_2331216517736464
crossref_primary_10_1177_2331216517736464
sage_journals_10_1177_2331216517736464
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Los Angeles, CA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Los Angeles, CA
– name: United States
– name: Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA
PublicationTitle Trends in hearing
PublicationTitleAlternate Trends Amplif
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher SAGE Publications
SAGE Publishing
Publisher_xml – name: SAGE Publications
– name: SAGE Publishing
References Srinivasan, Shannon, Landsberger 2012; 286
Sanpetrino, Smith 2006; 1
Shannon 2015; 322
McCreery, Agnew, Yuen, Bullara 1988; 16
Chen, Ishihara, Zeng 2005; 118
Litovsky, Jones, Agrawal, van Hoesel 2010; 127
Tang, Benitez, Zeng 2011; 8
Saoji, Litvak 2010; 31
Busby, Whitford, Blamey, Richardson, Clark 1994; 95
Hughes, Stille 2010; 31
Morse, Morse, Nunn, Archer, Boyle 2007; 8
Zeng, Galvin, Zhang 1998; 9
Saoji, Landsberger, Padilla, Litvak 2013; 298
Chatterjee, Peng 2008; 235
McCreery, Agnew, Yuen, Bullara 1992; 30
McCreery, Agnew, Yuen, Bullara 1995; 33
Zeng, Shannon 1994; 264
McKay, Henshall 2003; 181
Hong, Rubinstein 2003; 114
Shannon 1992; 39
Donaldson, Kreft, Litvak 2005; 118
Macherey, van Wieringen, Carlyon, Deeks, Wouters 2006; 7
McKay, Remine, McDermott 2001; 110
Lu, Litovsky, Zeng 2010; 127
van Wieringen, Carlyon, Laneau, Wouters 2005; 200
Landsberger, Srinivasan 2009; 254
Landsberger, Galvin 2011; 130
Landsberger, Padilla, Srinivasan 2012; 284
Padilla, Landsberger 2014; 135
Padilla, Stupak, Landsberger 2017; 348
Prado-Guitierrez, Fewster, Heasman, McKay, Shepherd 2006; 215
Shannon 1983; 12
Frijns, Kalkman, Vanpoucke, Bongers, Briaire 2009; 129
McCreery, Agnew, Yuen, Bullara 1990; 37
Berenstein, Mens, Mulder, Vanpoucke 2008; 29
van Hoesel, Clark 1997; 102
van Hoesel, Jones, Litovsky 2009; 10
Kan, Stoelb, Litovsky, Goupell, Ye 2013; 134
Firszt, Koch, Downing, Litvak 2007; 28
Majdak, Laback, Baumgartner 2006; 120
Chatterjee, Fu, Shannon 2000; 107
Shannon, Adams, Ferrel, Palumbo, Grandgenett 1990; 87
Ali, Lobo, Loizou 2013; 60
Loizou, Hu, Litovsky, Yu, Peters, Lake, Roland 2009; 125
Chatterjee 1999; 105
Luo, Fu 2007; 122
Zhu, Tang, Zeng, Guan, Ye 2012; 283
Bierer 2007; 121
bibr34-2331216517736464
bibr4-2331216517736464
bibr26-2331216517736464
bibr42-2331216517736464
bibr18-2331216517736464
bibr50-2331216517736464
bibr35-2331216517736464
bibr33-2331216517736464
bibr16-2331216517736464
bibr3-2331216517736464
bibr52-2331216517736464
bibr25-2331216517736464
bibr17-2331216517736464
bibr51-2331216517736464
bibr43-2331216517736464
bibr40-2331216517736464
bibr6-2331216517736464
bibr37-2331216517736464
bibr24-2331216517736464
bibr11-2331216517736464
bibr14-2331216517736464
bibr27-2331216517736464
bibr1-2331216517736464
bibr45-2331216517736464
bibr19-2331216517736464
bibr32-2331216517736464
bibr9-2331216517736464
bibr21-2331216517736464
bibr39-2331216517736464
bibr13-2331216517736464
bibr12-2331216517736464
bibr20-2331216517736464
bibr48-2331216517736464
bibr46-2331216517736464
bibr22-2331216517736464
bibr8-2331216517736464
bibr29-2331216517736464
bibr38-2331216517736464
bibr30-2331216517736464
bibr47-2331216517736464
bibr15-2331216517736464
bibr10-2331216517736464
bibr23-2331216517736464
bibr28-2331216517736464
bibr7-2331216517736464
bibr31-2331216517736464
bibr2-2331216517736464
bibr44-2331216517736464
bibr41-2331216517736464
bibr5-2331216517736464
bibr49-2331216517736464
bibr36-2331216517736464
References_xml – volume: 30
  start-page: 109
  issue: 1
  year: 1992
  end-page: 114
  article-title: Damage in peripheral nerve from continuous electrical stimulation: Comparison of two stimulus waveforms
  publication-title: Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
– volume: 33
  start-page: 426
  issue: 3 Spec No
  year: 1995
  end-page: 429
  article-title: Relationship between stimulus amplitude, stimulus frequency and neural damage during electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve of cat
  publication-title: Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
– volume: 1
  start-page: 1642
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1644
  article-title: The growth of loudness functions measured in cochlear implant listeners using absolute magnitude estimation and compared using Akaike’s information criterion
  publication-title: Conference Proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
– volume: 39
  start-page: 424
  issue: 4
  year: 1992
  end-page: 426
  article-title: A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
– volume: 135
  start-page: EL102
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: EL108
  article-title: Loudness summation using focused and unfocused electrical stimulation
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 10
  start-page: 557
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  end-page: 567
  article-title: Interaural Time-Delay Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Pulse Rate, Modulation Rate, and Place of Stimulation
  publication-title: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
– volume: 31
  start-page: 693
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  end-page: 701
  article-title: Use of “phantom electrode” technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant
  publication-title: Ear and Hearing
– volume: 118
  start-page: 338
  year: 2005
  end-page: 345
  article-title: Pitch discrimination of patterned electric stimulation
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 130
  start-page: 1559
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1566
  article-title: Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 120
  start-page: 2190
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2201
  article-title: Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 284
  start-page: 16
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2012
  end-page: 24
  article-title: Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users
  publication-title: Hearing and Research
– volume: 125
  start-page: 372
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 383
  article-title: Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting
  publication-title: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 286
  start-page: 19
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2012
  end-page: 29
  article-title: Improving Virtual Channel Discrimination in a Multi-Channel Context
  publication-title: Hearing Research
– volume: 264
  start-page: 564
  year: 1994
  end-page: 566
  article-title: Loudness-coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory system
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 134
  start-page: 2923
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2936
  article-title: Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users
  publication-title: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 105
  start-page: 850
  issue: 2, Pt 1
  year: 1999
  end-page: 860
  article-title: Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 37
  start-page: 996
  issue: 10
  year: 1990
  end-page: 1001
  article-title: Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
– volume: 200
  start-page: 73
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2005
  end-page: 86
  article-title: Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear
  publication-title: Hearing and Research
– volume: 7
  start-page: 253
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  end-page: 266
  article-title: Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: Effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate
  publication-title: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
– volume: 127
  start-page: 400
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 414
  article-title: Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 8
  start-page: 046029
  year: 2011
  article-title: Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants
  publication-title: Journal of Neural Engineering
– volume: 215
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2006
  end-page: 55
  article-title: Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival
  publication-title: Hearing and Research
– volume: 118
  start-page: 623
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  end-page: 626
  article-title: Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L)
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 28
  start-page: 629
  issue: 5
  year: 2007
  end-page: 636
  article-title: Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients
  publication-title: Otology and Neurotology
– volume: 129
  start-page: 433
  year: 2009
  end-page: 439
  article-title: Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: Evidence for two neural response modalities
  publication-title: Acta Otolaryngol
– volume: 16
  start-page: 463
  issue: 5
  year: 1988
  end-page: 481
  article-title: Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with faradaic and capacitor electrodes
  publication-title: Annals of Biomedical Engineering
– volume: 114
  start-page: 3327
  issue: 6 Pt 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 3342
  article-title: High-rate conditioning pulse trains in cochlear implants: Dynamic range measures with sinusoidal stimuli
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 8
  start-page: 42
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 53
  article-title: The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli
  publication-title: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 1983
  end-page: 16
  article-title: Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction
  publication-title: Hearing and Research
– volume: 102
  start-page: 495
  issue: 1
  year: 1997
  end-page: 507
  article-title: Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 181
  start-page: 94
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2003
  end-page: 99
  article-title: The perceptual effects of interphase gap duration in cochlear implant stimulation
  publication-title: Hearing and Research
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1845
  issue: 8
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1848
  article-title: Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve
  publication-title: Neuroreport
– volume: 107
  start-page: 1637
  issue: 3
  year: 2000
  end-page: 1644
  article-title: Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 254
  start-page: 34
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 41
  article-title: Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients
  publication-title: Hearing and Research
– volume: 127
  start-page: 1479
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1490
  article-title: Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 29
  start-page: 250
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  end-page: 260
  article-title: Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: Comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations
  publication-title: Ear and Hearing
– volume: 95
  start-page: 2658
  issue: 5 Pt 1
  year: 1994
  end-page: 2669
  article-title: Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 298
  start-page: 109
  year: 2013
  end-page: 116
  article-title: Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants
  publication-title: Hearing and Research
– volume: 110
  start-page: 1514
  issue: 3 Pt 1
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1524
  article-title: Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 121
  start-page: 1642
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1653
  article-title: Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: Evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 322
  start-page: 57
  year: 2015
  end-page: 66
  article-title: Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013
  publication-title: Hearing and Research
– volume: 87
  start-page: 905
  issue: 2
  year: 1990
  end-page: 907
  article-title: A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the nucleus cochlear implant
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 60
  start-page: 3060
  issue: 11
  year: 2013
  end-page: 3073
  article-title: Design and evaluation of a personal digital assistant-based research platform for cochlear implants
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
– volume: 122
  start-page: 1046
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1054
  article-title: Frequency modulation detection with simultaneous amplitude modulation by cochlear implant users
  publication-title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
– volume: 348
  start-page: 54
  year: 2017
  end-page: 62
  article-title: Pitch Ranking with Different Virtual Channel Configurations in Electrical Hearing
  publication-title: Hearing Research
– volume: 235
  start-page: 143
  year: 2008
  end-page: 156
  article-title: Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition
  publication-title: Hearing Research
– volume: 283
  start-page: 45
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2012
  end-page: 58
  article-title: Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation
  publication-title: Hearing and Research
– volume: 31
  start-page: 679
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  end-page: 692
  article-title: Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants
  publication-title: Ear and Hearing
– ident: bibr30-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1007/s10162-006-0064-5
– ident: bibr9-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004
– ident: bibr12-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.1937362
– ident: bibr44-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1097/00001756-199806010-00033
– ident: bibr11-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1159/000438742
– ident: bibr29-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.1394222
– ident: bibr23-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1007/s10162-006-0040-0
– ident: bibr3-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.2436712
– ident: bibr2-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1177/2331216515619763
– ident: bibr14-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1080/00016480802610218
– ident: bibr37-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90115-6
– ident: bibr35-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.12.006
– ident: bibr25-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1007/BF02368010
– ident: bibr4-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181645336
– ident: bibr42-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.419611
– ident: bibr28-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00177-1
– ident: bibr26-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1007/BF02446202
– ident: bibr41-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046029
– ident: bibr33-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0440-x
– ident: bibr22-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.2751258
– ident: bibr31-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.4862877
– ident: bibr43-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.006
– ident: bibr1-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2262712
– ident: bibr8-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.428448
– ident: bibr49-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.2258390
– ident: bibr47-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.4820889
– ident: bibr46-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.005
– ident: bibr10-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.1937228
– ident: bibr17-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.3613938
– ident: bibr6-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.021
– ident: bibr18-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.009
– ident: bibr38-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1109/10.126616
– ident: bibr7-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.426274
– ident: bibr27-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1007/BF02510526
– ident: bibr13-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000281803.36574.bc
– ident: bibr32-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.006
– ident: bibr5-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.409835
– ident: bibr21-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.3290994
– ident: bibr48-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.3036175
– ident: bibr39-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.003
– ident: bibr16-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e1d19e
– ident: bibr15-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.1623785
– ident: bibr50-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.013
– ident: bibr34-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259984
– ident: bibr20-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.3257546
– ident: bibr51-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.02.011
– ident: bibr24-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1109/10.102812
– ident: bibr52-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1007/s10162-009-0175-x
– ident: bibr19-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.007
– ident: bibr40-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1121/1.398902
– ident: bibr36-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e1d15e
– ident: bibr45-2331216517736464
  doi: 10.1126/science.8160013
SSID ssj0001255762
Score 2.2612236
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet A growing number of laboratories are using research interfaces to conduct experiments with cochlear-implant (CI) users. Because these interfaces bypass a...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
sage
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 2331216517736464
SubjectTerms Bionics
Cochlear Implants - adverse effects
Electric Stimulation - adverse effects
Electric Stimulation - methods
Ethics, Research
Evidence-Based Practice - ethics
Evidence-Based Practice - standards
Humans
Loudness Perception
Patient Safety
Review
Software Design
Sound - adverse effects
User-Computer Interface
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA7iQbyIb-uLCCJ4KJumSZoeVVxEWEFw0Vtp0oQVpLu46_93ps2uuz4v3kofNJmZZL5JJt8QcqolY947H4tKylhoJ2LDyzI2leepZUYbhmeHe3fqpi9un-TTXKkvzAlr6YFbwXUqDx5cI88aLlfYxOhS5KJiUnvj8jbwYTmbC6ba1RUJQJp_7Et2eJomPFESrlMllFjwQw1d_3cY82uq5Fy-V-OCuutkLWBHetG2eYMsuXqTrPTC7vgWue-PHR16Os2mo81yn8ekKwrYlLaT3ShohoYUQvr4PBnQq6EdYAWJGOmCQdq0j8cwt0m_e_1wdROHkgmxBaFPYm8105gIknAHgU0FwRjIKIMZTVWp8TZPtHK6shmgPvD90mfK2Iyxype-zJVJd8hyPazdHqFCphypO6XSgFGYzsHZZ6XEfTc8nOsi0pkKsLCBTxzLWrwUSaAQ_yzyiJzPvhi1XBq_vHuJOpm9hyzYzQ2wjSLYRvGXbUTkZKrRAkYNboWUtRu-jYsEC91ADJ6riOy2Gp79ioO0UpnlEckWdL_QlsUn9fOgYeYGmwNQAF-eoZUUYToY_9jL_f_o5QFZ5Yg1mgzDQ7I8eX1zR4CUJua4GRTvP_EJeA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
  dbid: AFRWT
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1La9wwEB7SBEovpe-6L1QohR7UtWVJlk8lDV1CIYWWLMnNWLKUDTR2yHoP_fedseVttmlLb8aWsTWjsT_N4xuAN0alaQg-cNkoxaXxkltR19w2QeQutcamVDt89EUfLuTnU3W6A-1UCxMluHpPaVX4RsPHmqybvNGzGGSciTzPRKYVHudaavlh3V9Uo7d7aqpBZyg8vb6gyLajfMgffKpuuwV71IsJDXlvf_7t5PiaV0YhABe_4pk3HrX1_xpo_v-ETW-mWF7LExt-XfN7cDdiTrY_LpL7sOPbB3D7KEbVH8LXxcqzLrApC48NbsJAyVoMMS0bP5KXUaMsph6yk_N-yQ46t6TOE5xohlFLbEHlm49gMf90fHDIY6sF7lBZPQ_OpIYSSDLhcUPU4Cau1MRcmukmt8GVKC1vGlcgWkTMoEKhrSvStAl1qEtt88ew23atfwpMqlwQ5afSBrFNakoECUWtKF5HRb0-gdkkwMpFHnJqh_G9yiL1-O8iT-Dd5o7LkYPjH2M_kk4244g9ezjRXZ1V0RirJiAqNMTdRy4wl1lTy1I2qTLBepx3Aq8njVZobRRCqVvfrVdVRg1ycO9e6gSejBrePEqgtHJVlAkUW7rfepftK-35cmD0xjWHYALvfEurpJqM4K-zfPa_A5_DHUE4ZMg-fAG7_dXav0QU1dtXcen_BKtYFLU
  priority: 102
  providerName: SAGE Publications
Title Use of Research Interfaces for Psychophysical Studies With Cochlear-Implant Users
URI https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2331216517736464
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29113579
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1961852396
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5764139
https://doaj.org/article/df39288285b142c1b8a494d058fbe961
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bi9QwFA66C-KLeLdehggi-BA3aZo0fRBZF4dFGEHZsvtWmjRxFpZ2nZkF_feek2ZmHXcVfCtt0ss5SfOdS75DyCujOA_BB1Z0SrHC-ILZvG2Z7UIuHbfGctw7PPusD-vi04k6udwenQS4vNa0w3pS9eLs7Y_vP9_DhH-XQo57uZQiF1rBsdSFLm6SXViXNJpiswT2R4-LAnCdx2pzUjDscRm3vHKTrXUq0vlfh0GvplL-lg8Wl6jpXXInYUu6Pw6Ge-SG7--TW7MUPX9AvtRLT4dA19l2NLoDAyZlUcCudPwZnifN0ZRiSI9PV3N6MLg5VphgSCcM2qA1btN8SOrpx6ODQ5ZKKjAHSlmx4Aw3mCgicg-GTwfGWqWRoVToTtrgKmG0N50rARUCNlCh1NaVnHehDW2lrXxEdvqh908ILZTMkdpTaQMYhpsKwEDZKozL4eZdn5G9tQAbl_jGsezFWSMSxfifIs_Im02P85Fr4x9tP6BONu2QJTueGBbfmjTpmi4A-jPI0YeuLiesaYuq6LgywXr47oy8XGu0gVmFoZK298PFshFYCAds9Epn5PGo4c2jcpCWVGWVkXJL91vvsn2lP51H5m4YfwAaoOdrHCXNerT_9Suf_odEnpHbOUKOmGj4nOysFhf-BQCmlZ2Q3f3p1-OjSXQ4TOKs-AXd4wtE
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwED_BJsFeJj63bHwYCSHxEOY4tuM8jomqwDoJ1Gp7i2LHppNQMq3d_7-71C0tA8RblNiKfeezf_adfwfw1ijOQ_AhlY1SqTReplbUdWqbIHLHrbGc7g6PzvRwIr9cqIu1VF9RgrMPFFaFLeon65V1F8WRyPNMZFrhc66llvdhW6oeG20fD76fj9cOWBRiafHLNXmn6sZS1DP2_wlm3o2WXAv56lehwSPYjfCRHS_0_Rju-fYJPBhFB_lT-DaZedYFtgyoY_2JX6C4K4bwlC3mu6uoHBajCNn55XzKTjo3pSQSKTEGo8DZhG5iPoPJ4NP4ZJjGrAmpQ7nP0-AMNxQLkgmPe5sG92OlJhLSTDe5Da7MjPamcQUCP1z-VSi0dQXnTahDXWqbP4ettmv9PjCpckHsnUobhCnclLjeF7Ui1xvdz_UJHC0FWLlIKU6ZLX5WWWQR_13kCbxf1bha0Gn8o-xH0smqHBFh9y-66x9VtKuqCQjwDNHw0WmWy6ypZSkbrkywHvudwJulRis0HPKG1K3vbmZVRrlucBte6gT2Fhpe_UqgtHJVlAkUG7rfaMvml_Zy2pNz45hDXIA139EoqZbj-a-9PPjfgq_h4XA8Oq1OP599PYQdQfCiDyp8AVvz6xv_EsHR3L6KZnALjKICGw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwEB7BVqq4IN6Ep5EQEoewjmM7zrEUVuXRClBX7S2KX2wllKy62__PTNa7dCkgblFiK_GMHX_2fP4G4KVRnMcYYi69Urk0QeZWtG1ufRSl49ZYTmeHD4_0wVR-PFWniZtDZ2GSBRdviFaFXzT8rGl0z30cpxjjWJRlIQqt8LrUUsvrsCMphe4IdvYm306OL22yKMTT4ld48krVreloUO3_E9S8ypi8RPsaZqLJLbiZICTbW_n8NlwL3R3YPUxB8rvwdboIrI9sTapjw65fJO4VQ4jKVv-8eXIQS0xCdnK2nLH93s0okUROqsFodDal05j3YDp5f7x_kKfMCblD2y_z6Aw3xAcpRMD1jcc1Wa1JiLTQvrTR1YXRwXhXIfhDCKBipa2rOPexjW2tbXkfRl3fhYfApCoFKXgqbRCqcFPjnF-1isJvdEY3ZDBeG7BxSVacslv8aIqkJP67yTN4vakxX0lq_KPsW_LJphyJYQ83-vPvTRpbjY8I8gxJ8dGOliusaWUtPVcm2oDtzuDF2qMNDh6KiLRd6C8WTUH5bnApXusMHqw8vHmVQGuVqqozqLZ8v_Ut20-6s9kg0I19DrEB1nxFvaRZ9-m_tvLR_xZ8Drtf3k2azx-OPj2GG4IQxsArfAKj5flFeIr4aGmfpVHwE5G4AzQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use+of+Research+Interfaces+for+Psychophysical+Studies+With+Cochlear-Implant+Users&rft.jtitle=Trends+in+hearing&rft.au=Litovsky%2C+Ruth+Y.&rft.au=Goupell%2C+Matthew+J.&rft.au=Kan%2C+Alan&rft.au=Landsberger%2C+David+M.&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.issn=2331-2165&rft.eissn=2331-2165&rft.volume=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F2331216517736464&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_2331216517736464
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2331-2165&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2331-2165&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2331-2165&client=summon