Online Communication Between Doctors and Patients in Europe: Status and Perspectives

Use of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and patient is one aspect of eHealth with potentially great impact on the use of health systems, patient-doctor roles and relations and individuals...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical Internet research Vol. 12; no. 2; p. e20
Main Authors Santana, Silvina, Lausen, Berthold, Bujnowska-Fedak, Maria, Chronaki, Catherine, Kummervold, Per Egil, Rasmussen, Janne, Sorensen, Tove
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Canada Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor 15.06.2010
Gunther Eysenbach
JMIR Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1438-8871
1438-8871
DOI10.2196/jmir.1281

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Use of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and patient is one aspect of eHealth with potentially great impact on the use of health systems, patient-doctor roles and relations and individuals' health. Monitoring and understanding practices, trends, and expectations in this area is important, as it may bring invaluable knowledge to all stakeholders, in the Health 2.0 era. Our two main goals were: (1) to investigate use of the Internet and changes in expectations about future use for particular aspects of communication with a known doctor (obtaining a prescription, scheduling an appointment, or asking a particular health question), and (2) to investigate how important the provision of email and Web services to communicate with the physician is when choosing a new doctor for a first time face-to-face appointment. The data come from the second survey of the eHealth Trends study, which addressed trends and perspectives of health-related Internet use in Europe. This study builds on previous work that established levels of generic use of the Internet for self-help activities, ordering medicine or other health products, interacting with a Web doctor/unknown health professional, and communicating with a family doctor or other known health professional. A representative sample of citizens from seven European countries was surveyed (n = 7022) in April and May of 2007 through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). Respondents were questioned about their use of the Internet to obtain a prescription, schedule an appointment, or ask a health professional about a particular health question. They were also asked what their expectations were regarding future use of the Internet for health-related matters. In a more pragmatic approach to the subject, they were asked about the perceived importance when choosing a new doctor of the possibility of using email and the Web to communicate with that physician. Logistic regression analysis was used to draw the profiles of users of related eHealth services in Europe among the population in general and in the subgroup of those who use the Internet for health-related matters. Changes from 2005 to 2007 were computed using data from the first eHealth Trends survey (October and November 2005, n = 7934). In 2007, an estimated 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 - 2.1) of the population in these countries had used the Internet to request or renew a prescription; 3.2% (95% CI 2.8 - 3.6) had used the Internet to schedule an appointment; and 2.5% (95% CI 2.2 - 2.9) had used the Internet to ask a particular health question. This represents estimated increases of 0.9% (95% CI 0.5 - 1.3), 1.7% (95% CI 1.2 - 2.2), and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9 - 1.8). An estimated 18.0% (95% CI 17.1 - 18.9) of the populations of these countries expected that in the near future they would have consultations with health professionals online, and 25.4% (95% CI 24.4 - 26.3) expected that in the near future they would be able to schedule an appointment online. Among those using the Internet for health-related purposes, on average more than 4 in 10 people considered the provision of these eHealth services to be important when choosing a new doctor. Use of the Internet to communicate with a known health professional is still rare in Europe. Legal context, health policy issues, and technical conditions prevailing in different countries might be playing a major role in the situation. Interest in associated eHealth services is high among citizens and likely to increase.
AbstractList Use of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and patient is one aspect of eHealth with potentially great impact on the use of health systems, patient-doctor roles and relations and individuals' health. Monitoring and understanding practices, trends, and expectations in this area is important, as it may bring invaluable knowledge to all stakeholders, in the Health 2.0 era.BACKGROUNDUse of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and patient is one aspect of eHealth with potentially great impact on the use of health systems, patient-doctor roles and relations and individuals' health. Monitoring and understanding practices, trends, and expectations in this area is important, as it may bring invaluable knowledge to all stakeholders, in the Health 2.0 era.Our two main goals were: (1) to investigate use of the Internet and changes in expectations about future use for particular aspects of communication with a known doctor (obtaining a prescription, scheduling an appointment, or asking a particular health question), and (2) to investigate how important the provision of email and Web services to communicate with the physician is when choosing a new doctor for a first time face-to-face appointment. The data come from the second survey of the eHealth Trends study, which addressed trends and perspectives of health-related Internet use in Europe. This study builds on previous work that established levels of generic use of the Internet for self-help activities, ordering medicine or other health products, interacting with a Web doctor/unknown health professional, and communicating with a family doctor or other known health professional.OBJECTIVEOur two main goals were: (1) to investigate use of the Internet and changes in expectations about future use for particular aspects of communication with a known doctor (obtaining a prescription, scheduling an appointment, or asking a particular health question), and (2) to investigate how important the provision of email and Web services to communicate with the physician is when choosing a new doctor for a first time face-to-face appointment. The data come from the second survey of the eHealth Trends study, which addressed trends and perspectives of health-related Internet use in Europe. This study builds on previous work that established levels of generic use of the Internet for self-help activities, ordering medicine or other health products, interacting with a Web doctor/unknown health professional, and communicating with a family doctor or other known health professional.A representative sample of citizens from seven European countries was surveyed (n = 7022) in April and May of 2007 through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). Respondents were questioned about their use of the Internet to obtain a prescription, schedule an appointment, or ask a health professional about a particular health question. They were also asked what their expectations were regarding future use of the Internet for health-related matters. In a more pragmatic approach to the subject, they were asked about the perceived importance when choosing a new doctor of the possibility of using email and the Web to communicate with that physician. Logistic regression analysis was used to draw the profiles of users of related eHealth services in Europe among the population in general and in the subgroup of those who use the Internet for health-related matters. Changes from 2005 to 2007 were computed using data from the first eHealth Trends survey (October and November 2005, n = 7934).METHODSA representative sample of citizens from seven European countries was surveyed (n = 7022) in April and May of 2007 through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). Respondents were questioned about their use of the Internet to obtain a prescription, schedule an appointment, or ask a health professional about a particular health question. They were also asked what their expectations were regarding future use of the Internet for health-related matters. In a more pragmatic approach to the subject, they were asked about the perceived importance when choosing a new doctor of the possibility of using email and the Web to communicate with that physician. Logistic regression analysis was used to draw the profiles of users of related eHealth services in Europe among the population in general and in the subgroup of those who use the Internet for health-related matters. Changes from 2005 to 2007 were computed using data from the first eHealth Trends survey (October and November 2005, n = 7934).In 2007, an estimated 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 - 2.1) of the population in these countries had used the Internet to request or renew a prescription; 3.2% (95% CI 2.8 - 3.6) had used the Internet to schedule an appointment; and 2.5% (95% CI 2.2 - 2.9) had used the Internet to ask a particular health question. This represents estimated increases of 0.9% (95% CI 0.5 - 1.3), 1.7% (95% CI 1.2 - 2.2), and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9 - 1.8). An estimated 18.0% (95% CI 17.1 - 18.9) of the populations of these countries expected that in the near future they would have consultations with health professionals online, and 25.4% (95% CI 24.4 - 26.3) expected that in the near future they would be able to schedule an appointment online. Among those using the Internet for health-related purposes, on average more than 4 in 10 people considered the provision of these eHealth services to be important when choosing a new doctor.RESULTSIn 2007, an estimated 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 - 2.1) of the population in these countries had used the Internet to request or renew a prescription; 3.2% (95% CI 2.8 - 3.6) had used the Internet to schedule an appointment; and 2.5% (95% CI 2.2 - 2.9) had used the Internet to ask a particular health question. This represents estimated increases of 0.9% (95% CI 0.5 - 1.3), 1.7% (95% CI 1.2 - 2.2), and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9 - 1.8). An estimated 18.0% (95% CI 17.1 - 18.9) of the populations of these countries expected that in the near future they would have consultations with health professionals online, and 25.4% (95% CI 24.4 - 26.3) expected that in the near future they would be able to schedule an appointment online. Among those using the Internet for health-related purposes, on average more than 4 in 10 people considered the provision of these eHealth services to be important when choosing a new doctor.Use of the Internet to communicate with a known health professional is still rare in Europe. Legal context, health policy issues, and technical conditions prevailing in different countries might be playing a major role in the situation. Interest in associated eHealth services is high among citizens and likely to increase.CONCLUSIONSUse of the Internet to communicate with a known health professional is still rare in Europe. Legal context, health policy issues, and technical conditions prevailing in different countries might be playing a major role in the situation. Interest in associated eHealth services is high among citizens and likely to increase.
BackgroundUse of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and patient is one aspect of eHealth with potentially great impact on the use of health systems, patient-doctor roles and relations and individuals’ health. Monitoring and understanding practices, trends, and expectations in this area is important, as it may bring invaluable knowledge to all stakeholders, in the Health 2.0 era. ObjectiveOur two main goals were: (1) to investigate use of the Internet and changes in expectations about future use for particular aspects of communication with a known doctor (obtaining a prescription, scheduling an appointment, or asking a particular health question), and (2) to investigate how important the provision of email and Web services to communicate with the physician is when choosing a new doctor for a first time face-to-face appointment. The data come from the second survey of the eHealth Trends study, which addressed trends and perspectives of health-related Internet use in Europe. This study builds on previous work that established levels of generic use of the Internet for self-help activities, ordering medicine or other health products, interacting with a Web doctor/unknown health professional, and communicating with a family doctor or other known health professional. MethodsA representative sample of citizens from seven European countries was surveyed (n = 7022) in April and May of 2007 through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). Respondents were questioned about their use of the Internet to obtain a prescription, schedule an appointment, or ask a health professional about a particular health question. They were also asked what their expectations were regarding future use of the Internet for health-related matters. In a more pragmatic approach to the subject, they were asked about the perceived importance when choosing a new doctor of the possibility of using email and the Web to communicate with that physician. Logistic regression analysis was used to draw the profiles of users of related eHealth services in Europe among the population in general and in the subgroup of those who use the Internet for health-related matters. Changes from 2005 to 2007 were computed using data from the first eHealth Trends survey (October and November 2005, n = 7934). ResultsIn 2007, an estimated 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 - 2.1) of the population in these countries had used the Internet to request or renew a prescription; 3.2% (95% CI 2.8 - 3.6) had used the Internet to schedule an appointment; and 2.5% (95% CI 2.2 - 2.9) had used the Internet to ask a particular health question. This represents estimated increases of 0.9% (95% CI 0.5 - 1.3), 1.7% (95% CI 1.2 - 2.2), and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9 - 1.8). An estimated 18.0% (95% CI 17.1 - 18.9) of the populations of these countries expected that in the near future they would have consultations with health professionals online, and 25.4% (95% CI 24.4 - 26.3) expected that in the near future they would be able to schedule an appointment online. Among those using the Internet for health-related purposes, on average more than 4 in 10 people considered the provision of these eHealth services to be important when choosing a new doctor. ConclusionsUse of the Internet to communicate with a known health professional is still rare in Europe. Legal context, health policy issues, and technical conditions prevailing in different countries might be playing a major role in the situation. Interest in associated eHealth services is high among citizens and likely to increase.
Background: Use of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and patient is one aspect of eHealth with potentially great impact on the use of health systems, patient-doctor roles and relations and individuals’ health. Monitoring and understanding practices, trends, and expectations in this area is important, as it may bring invaluable knowledge to all stakeholders, in the Health 2.0 era. Objective: Our two main goals were: (1) to investigate use of the Internet and changes in expectations about future use for particular aspects of communication with a known doctor (obtaining a prescription, scheduling an appointment, or asking a particular health question), and (2) to investigate how important the provision of email and Web services to communicate with the physician is when choosing a new doctor for a first time face-to-face appointment. The data come from the second survey of the eHealth Trends study, which addressed trends and perspectives of health-related Internet use in Europe. This study builds on previous work that established levels of generic use of the Internet for self-help activities, ordering medicine or other health products, interacting with a Web doctor/unknown health professional, and communicating with a family doctor or other known health professional. Methods: A representative sample of citizens from seven European countries was surveyed (n = 7022) in April and May of 2007 through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). Respondents were questioned about their use of the Internet to obtain a prescription, schedule an appointment, or ask a health professional about a particular health question. They were also asked what their expectations were regarding future use of the Internet for health-related matters. In a more pragmatic approach to the subject, they were asked about the perceived importance when choosing a new doctor of the possibility of using email and the Web to communicate with that physician. Logistic regression analysis was used to draw the profiles of users of related eHealth services in Europe among the population in general and in the subgroup of those who use the Internet for health-related matters. Changes from 2005 to 2007 were computed using data from the first eHealth Trends survey (October and November 2005, n = 7934). Results: In 2007, an estimated 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 - 2.1) of the population in these countries had used the Internet to request or renew a prescription; 3.2% (95% CI 2.8 - 3.6) had used the Internet to schedule an appointment; and 2.5% (95% CI 2.2 - 2.9) had used the Internet to ask a particular health question. This represents estimated increases of 0.9% (95% CI 0.5 - 1.3), 1.7% (95% CI 1.2 - 2.2), and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9 - 1.8). An estimated 18.0% (95% CI 17.1 - 18.9) of the populations of these countries expected that in the near future they would have consultations with health professionals online, and 25.4% (95% CI 24.4 - 26.3) expected that in the near future they would be able to schedule an appointment online. Among those using the Internet for health-related purposes, on average more than 4 in 10 people considered the provision of these eHealth services to be important when choosing a new doctor. Conclusions: Use of the Internet to communicate with a known health professional is still rare in Europe. Legal context, health policy issues, and technical conditions prevailing in different countries might be playing a major role in the situation. Interest in associated eHealth services is high among citizens and likely to increase.
Background: Use of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and patient is one aspect of eHealth with potentially great impact on the use of health systems, patient-doctor roles and relations and individuals' health. Monitoring and understanding practices, trends, and expectations in this area is important, as it may bring invaluable knowledge to all stakeholders, in the Health 2.0 era. Objective: Our two main goals were: (1) to investigate use of the Internet and changes in expectations about future use for particular aspects of communication with a known doctor (obtaining a prescription, scheduling an appointment, or asking a particular health question), and (2) to investigate how important the provision of email and Web services to communicate with the physician is when choosing a new doctor for a first time face-to-face appointment. The data come from the second survey of the eHealth Trends study, which addressed trends and perspectives of health-related Internet use in Europe. This study builds on previous work that established levels of generic use of the Internet for self-help activities, ordering medicine or other health products, interacting with a Web doctor/unknown health professional, and communicating with a family doctor or other known health professional. Methods: A representative sample of citizens from seven European countries was surveyed (n = 7022) in April and May of 2007 through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). Respondents were questioned about their use of the Internet to obtain a prescription, schedule an appointment, or ask a health professional about a particular health question. They were also asked what their expectations were regarding future use of the Internet for health-related matters. In a more pragmatic approach to the subject, they were asked about the perceived importance when choosing a new doctor of the possibility of using email and the Web to communicate with that physician. Logistic regression analysis was used to draw the profiles of users of related eHealth services in Europe among the population in general and in the subgroup of those who use the Internet for health-related matters. Changes from 2005 to 2007 were computed using data from the first eHealth Trends survey (October and November 2005, n = 7934). Results: In 2007, an estimated 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.1) of the population in these countries had used the Internet to request or renew a prescription; 3.2% (95% CI 2.8-3.6) had used the Internet to schedule an appointment; and 2.5% (95% CI 2.2-2.9) had used the Internet to ask a particular health question. This represents estimated increases of 0.9% (95% CI 0.5-1.3), 1.7% (95% CI 1.2-2.2), and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9-1.8). An estimated 18.0% (95% CI 17.1-18.9) of the populations of these countries expected that in the near future they would have consultations with health professionals online, and 25.4% (95% CI 24.4 - 26.3) expected that in the near future they would be able to schedule an appointment online. Among those using the Internet for health-related purposes, on average more than 4 in 10 people considered the provision of these eHealth services to be important when choosing a new doctor. Conclusions: Use of the Internet to communicate with a known health professional is still rare in Europe. Legal context, health policy issues, and technical conditions prevailing in different countries might be playing a major role in the situation. Interest in associated eHealth services is high among citizens and likely to increase. Adapted from the source document.
Use of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and patient is one aspect of eHealth with potentially great impact on the use of health systems, patient-doctor roles and relations and individuals' health. Monitoring and understanding practices, trends, and expectations in this area is important, as it may bring invaluable knowledge to all stakeholders, in the Health 2.0 era. Our two main goals were: (1) to investigate use of the Internet and changes in expectations about future use for particular aspects of communication with a known doctor (obtaining a prescription, scheduling an appointment, or asking a particular health question), and (2) to investigate how important the provision of email and Web services to communicate with the physician is when choosing a new doctor for a first time face-to-face appointment. The data come from the second survey of the eHealth Trends study, which addressed trends and perspectives of health-related Internet use in Europe. This study builds on previous work that established levels of generic use of the Internet for self-help activities, ordering medicine or other health products, interacting with a Web doctor/unknown health professional, and communicating with a family doctor or other known health professional. A representative sample of citizens from seven European countries was surveyed (n = 7022) in April and May of 2007 through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). Respondents were questioned about their use of the Internet to obtain a prescription, schedule an appointment, or ask a health professional about a particular health question. They were also asked what their expectations were regarding future use of the Internet for health-related matters. In a more pragmatic approach to the subject, they were asked about the perceived importance when choosing a new doctor of the possibility of using email and the Web to communicate with that physician. Logistic regression analysis was used to draw the profiles of users of related eHealth services in Europe among the population in general and in the subgroup of those who use the Internet for health-related matters. Changes from 2005 to 2007 were computed using data from the first eHealth Trends survey (October and November 2005, n = 7934). In 2007, an estimated 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 - 2.1) of the population in these countries had used the Internet to request or renew a prescription; 3.2% (95% CI 2.8 - 3.6) had used the Internet to schedule an appointment; and 2.5% (95% CI 2.2 - 2.9) had used the Internet to ask a particular health question. This represents estimated increases of 0.9% (95% CI 0.5 - 1.3), 1.7% (95% CI 1.2 - 2.2), and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9 - 1.8). An estimated 18.0% (95% CI 17.1 - 18.9) of the populations of these countries expected that in the near future they would have consultations with health professionals online, and 25.4% (95% CI 24.4 - 26.3) expected that in the near future they would be able to schedule an appointment online. Among those using the Internet for health-related purposes, on average more than 4 in 10 people considered the provision of these eHealth services to be important when choosing a new doctor. Use of the Internet to communicate with a known health professional is still rare in Europe. Legal context, health policy issues, and technical conditions prevailing in different countries might be playing a major role in the situation. Interest in associated eHealth services is high among citizens and likely to increase.
Author Chronaki, Catherine
Rasmussen, Janne
Sorensen, Tove
Lausen, Berthold
Bujnowska-Fedak, Maria
Santana, Silvina
Kummervold, Per Egil
AuthorAffiliation 6 Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
1 Institute of Electronics Engineering and Telematic of Aveiro and Department of Economics, Management and Industrial Engineering University of Aveiro Aveiro Portugal
2 Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Essex Colchester United Kingdom
5 Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Tromsø and Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine University Hospital of North-Norway Tromsø Norway
7 Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine University Hospital of North-Norway Tromsø Norway
3 Department of Family Medicine Wrocław Medical University Wrocław Poland
4 Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas Heraklion Greece
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 6 Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
– name: 7 Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine University Hospital of North-Norway Tromsø Norway
– name: 5 Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Tromsø and Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine University Hospital of North-Norway Tromsø Norway
– name: 2 Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Essex Colchester United Kingdom
– name: 3 Department of Family Medicine Wrocław Medical University Wrocław Poland
– name: 4 Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas Heraklion Greece
– name: 1 Institute of Electronics Engineering and Telematic of Aveiro and Department of Economics, Management and Industrial Engineering University of Aveiro Aveiro Portugal
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Silvina
  surname: Santana
  fullname: Santana, Silvina
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Berthold
  surname: Lausen
  fullname: Lausen, Berthold
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Maria
  surname: Bujnowska-Fedak
  fullname: Bujnowska-Fedak, Maria
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Catherine
  surname: Chronaki
  fullname: Chronaki, Catherine
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Per Egil
  surname: Kummervold
  fullname: Kummervold, Per Egil
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Janne
  surname: Rasmussen
  fullname: Rasmussen, Janne
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Tove
  surname: Sorensen
  fullname: Sorensen, Tove
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20551011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkk1rFTEUhoNU7Icu_AMy4EJc3DZnkswkLgS9Vi0UKljXITdzpuYyk9wmmZb-e3M_Km3duMoh73seztch2fPBIyGvgR7XoJqT5ejiMdQSnpED4EzOpGxh70G8Tw5TWlJaU67gBdmvqRBAAQ7I5YUfnMdqHsZx8s6a7IKvPmO-RfTVl2BziKkyvqt-FAl9TpXz1ekUwwo_VD-zydNOxphWaLO7wfSSPO_NkPDV7j0iv76eXs6_z84vvp3NP53PrKA0z2TXMIrYq47TxaJvLEUQHe2MRWqZQssQVd0CFwvKhZRFMYY3CyMZGGsVOyJnW24XzFKvohtNvNPBOL35CPFKm5idHVDXBqGVfY-tbTltpRR9y03XoQRGWU8L6-OWtZoWI3a2tBrN8Aj6WPHut74KN7pWoqkZFMC7HSCG6wlT1qNLFofBeAxT0q3gwJRU_-FkjPGGcV6cb584l2GKvsxU1wI2NrUew5uHpf-t-X7LxXCyNdgYUorYa-vyZtOlEzdooHp9R3p9R3p9RyXj_ZOMe-i_3j_V68mY
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_02813432_2024_2437417
crossref_primary_10_52547_jha_24_1_84
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_3700
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11764_019_00742_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12445_016_0217_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10916_017_0724_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_15213269_2022_2035769
crossref_primary_10_1111_poms_13381
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3768055
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_2133
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2016_12_007
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0199236
crossref_primary_10_2196_med20_1996
crossref_primary_10_2196_ijmr_4549
crossref_primary_10_2196_20099
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_4430
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_5244
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_015_1473_3
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3017974
crossref_primary_10_1089_dia_2014_0308
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare12191929
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2016_07_011
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_1599
crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocac087
crossref_primary_10_2196_mental_6375
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_2683
crossref_primary_10_1177_10781552221090904
crossref_primary_10_2196_51279
crossref_primary_10_1177_0002764217717565
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssaho_2023_100556
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_017_0474_9
crossref_primary_10_1080_17538068_2017_1282184
crossref_primary_10_1002_nvsm_1756
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191811532
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1463423611000624
crossref_primary_10_2196_28323
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0240303
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11764_020_00913_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2011_09_005
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_2358
crossref_primary_10_2196_25809
crossref_primary_10_1089_tmj_2017_0031
crossref_primary_10_2196_medinform_4515
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_etiqe_2012_06_002
crossref_primary_10_2196_ijmr_4245
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2296_12_20
crossref_primary_10_1177_2055207616675559
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v26_i29_4182
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_022_02073_4
crossref_primary_10_1093_fampra_cmv101
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_888657
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12553_012_0026_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rppneu_2011_03_011
crossref_primary_10_2196_cancer_4279
crossref_primary_10_3402_ljm_v11_32679
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12414_011_0066_z
crossref_primary_10_1192_pb_bp_114_047555
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rppnen_2011_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42979_021_00818_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medcli_2012_05_010
crossref_primary_10_5937_mgiszm2388057J
crossref_primary_10_1186_1472_6947_11_20
crossref_primary_10_1186_1472_6947_11_21
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhqr_2018_04_004
crossref_primary_10_2478_pielxxiw_2018_0001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaceta_2015_07_014
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_4365
crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2019_1673950
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_6747
crossref_primary_10_1177_2327857922111024
crossref_primary_10_1287_isre_2019_0901
crossref_primary_10_1186_1472_6920_12_37
crossref_primary_10_2196_44339
Cites_doi 10.1186/1741-7015-4-18
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20627.x
10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791133
10.1186/1472-6947-6-1
10.2196/jmir.1056
10.1197/jamia.M1778
10.14236/jhi.v12i4.127
10.1056/NEJMp038209
10.1136/bmj.329.7463.435
10.1186/1472-6947-3-11
10.1542/peds.2004-1297
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30432.x
10.2196/jmir.1023
10.2196/jmir.1152
10.2196/jmir.7.4.e47
10.1177/0022022199030002004
10.2196/jmir.5.2.e9
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.11.004
10.2196/jmir.1143
10.2196/jmir.8.4.e26
10.1542/peds.109.5.740
10.1056/NEJMsa0900592
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40009.x
10.1186/1471-2458-7-53
10.1001/jama.280.15.1353
10.1186/1472-6947-5-2
10.1377/hlthaff.19.6.115
10.2196/jmir.9.3.e20
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.002
10.1001/jama.280.15.1321
10.1080/10810730600637574
10.1542/peds.109.5.954
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Silvina Santana, Berthold Lausen, Maria Bujnowska-Fedak, Catherine Chronaki, Janne Rasmussen, Tove Sorensen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.06.2010   2010
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: Silvina Santana, Berthold Lausen, Maria Bujnowska-Fedak, Catherine Chronaki, Janne Rasmussen, Tove Sorensen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.06.2010   2010
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QJ
7RV
7X7
7XB
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ALSLI
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
CNYFK
DWQXO
E3H
F2A
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1O
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PRQQA
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.2196/jmir.1281
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Library & Information Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)
Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Library Science Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Social Sciences
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Library Science
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Library & Information Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest One Social Sciences
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

Publicly Available Content Database
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ (selected full-text)
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Library & Information Science
EISSN 1438-8871
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_2ae178ffe7c7407885f74adde81303f0
PMC2956231
20551011
10_2196_jmir_1281
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Europe
Greece
Latvia
Norway
Denmark
Poland
Portugal
Germany
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Europe
– name: Germany
– name: Denmark
– name: Poland
– name: Portugal
– name: Latvia
– name: Greece
– name: Norway
GroupedDBID ---
.4I
.DC
29L
2WC
36B
53G
5GY
5VS
77K
7RV
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAKPC
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABIVO
ABUWG
ACGFO
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AEGXH
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AIAGR
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
C1A
CCPQU
CITATION
CNYFK
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EAP
EBD
EBS
EJD
ELW
EMB
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FRP
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
KQ8
M1O
M48
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
RNS
RPM
SJN
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
XSB
ACUHS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PPXIY
PRQQA
3V.
7QJ
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
E3H
F2A
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-8d630eef9d40bbf6c0e15d0dace0c39ec3ee927145b045880daaa46ba831acc93
IEDL.DBID M1O
ISSN 1438-8871
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:39 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:45:31 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 08:28:37 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 23:10:02 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 02:08:22 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:52 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:51 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:25:40 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c500t-8d630eef9d40bbf6c0e15d0dace0c39ec3ee927145b045880daaa46ba831acc93
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/2513334699?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 20551011
PQID 2513334699
PQPubID 2033121
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ae178ffe7c7407885f74adde81303f0
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2956231
proquest_miscellaneous_754139891
proquest_miscellaneous_733346344
proquest_journals_2513334699
pubmed_primary_20551011
crossref_citationtrail_10_2196_jmir_1281
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_1281
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20100615
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-06-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 6
  year: 2010
  text: 20100615
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Canada
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Canada
– name: Toronto
– name: Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto, Canada
PublicationTitle Journal of medical Internet research
PublicationTitleAlternate J Med Internet Res
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor
Gunther Eysenbach
JMIR Publications
Publisher_xml – name: Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor
– name: Gunther Eysenbach
– name: JMIR Publications
References ref13
ref56
ref15
ref14
ref53
ref52
ref11
Cummings, J (ref29) 2006; 5
ref55
ref10
ref54
ref17
ref16
ref19
Smith, John J (ref12) 2002; 179
ref50
ref46
ref45
ref48
ref47
ref41
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine (ref44) 2001
Goodyear-Smith, Felicity (ref26) 2005; 13
ref49
CPME/SCED (ref1) 2004
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
ref35
ref34
ref37
Chronaki, C (ref51)
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref33
ref32
ref2
ref39
ref38
Neville, Ron G (ref27) 2004; 12
Meyer, I (ref43) 2008
Katz, Steven J (ref18) 2004; 10
R Development Core Team (ref42) 2008
ref24
ref23
ref25
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref28
15693928 - J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan;20(1):52-7
19403464 - J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e12
16911780 - BMC Med. 2006;4:18
15321902 - BMJ. 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):435-8
11986460 - Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):954-6
12795738 - J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):385-9
17627929 - J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3):e20
19632972 - J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e18
15808021 - Inform Prim Care. 2004;12(4):201-6
16396679 - BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:1
17213045 - J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(4):e26
16641080 - J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 1:147-56
16259859 - Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(3):195-202
15676077 - BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Jan 27;5:2
19017584 - J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(4):e42
15905484 - J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):530-6
14519206 - BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2003 Oct 1;3:11
21552397 - J Cross Cult Psychol. 1999 Mar;30(2):206-218
11986430 - Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):740-4
15333064 - J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Sep;19(9):978-83
11192394 - Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Nov-Dec;19(6):115-23
12857665 - J Med Internet Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;5(2):e9
16236699 - J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(4):e47
19321858 - N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1628-38
19625210 - Int J Med Inform. 2009 Oct;78(10):688-703
18682374 - J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e23
15515991 - Am J Manag Care. 2004 Sep;10(9):593-8
9794317 - JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1353-9
12388486 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Nov;179(5):1133-6
9794310 - JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1321-4
15102994 - N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 22;350(17):1705-7
17188564 - Int J Med Inform. 2008 Jan;77(1):17-23
15867036 - Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1283-8
17425798 - BMC Public Health. 2007;7:53
References_xml – ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-18
– ident: ref37
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20627.x
– volume: 179
  start-page: 1133
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  ident: ref12
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791133
– year: 2001
  ident: ref44
  publication-title: Crossing the Quality Chasm
– ident: ref45
  doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-1
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.1056
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1778
– volume: 12
  start-page: 201
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: ref27
  publication-title: Inform Prim Care
  doi: 10.14236/jhi.v12i4.127
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMp038209
– ident: ref53
– ident: ref34
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.435
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-3-11
– ident: ref36
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1297
– year: 2008
  ident: ref42
  publication-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30432.x
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.1023
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.1152
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.4.e47
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1177/0022022199030002004
– ident: ref40
– ident: ref50
– volume: 13
  start-page: 195
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: ref26
  publication-title: Inform Prim Care
– volume: 5
  issue: 16
  year: 2006
  ident: ref29
  publication-title: The Wall Street Journal Online
– ident: ref47
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e9
– ident: ref54
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.11.004
– ident: ref33
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.1143
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e26
– ident: ref39
– ident: ref3
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.740
– volume: 10
  start-page: 593
  issue: 9
  year: 2004
  ident: ref18
  publication-title: Am J Manag Care
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0900592
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40009.x
– ident: ref48
– ident: ref55
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1353
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-2
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.6.115
– ident: ref38
– year: 2004
  ident: ref1
  publication-title: Comité Permanent des Médicins Européens/Standing Committee of European Doctors
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e20
– ident: ref49
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.002
– ident: ref52
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1321
– ident: ref56
  doi: 10.1080/10810730600637574
– ident: ref51
  publication-title: In: Cunningham P, Cunnigham M, editors. Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press;36-42
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.954
– ident: ref35
– year: 2008
  ident: ref43
  publication-title: Benchmarking ICT use among General Practitioners in Europe, European Commission
– reference: 16236699 - J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(4):e47
– reference: 17188564 - Int J Med Inform. 2008 Jan;77(1):17-23
– reference: 12857665 - J Med Internet Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;5(2):e9
– reference: 21552397 - J Cross Cult Psychol. 1999 Mar;30(2):206-218
– reference: 15102994 - N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 22;350(17):1705-7
– reference: 19632972 - J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e18
– reference: 11192394 - Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Nov-Dec;19(6):115-23
– reference: 12795738 - J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):385-9
– reference: 18682374 - J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e23
– reference: 15693928 - J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan;20(1):52-7
– reference: 14519206 - BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2003 Oct 1;3:11
– reference: 15867036 - Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1283-8
– reference: 12388486 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Nov;179(5):1133-6
– reference: 15333064 - J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Sep;19(9):978-83
– reference: 15676077 - BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Jan 27;5:2
– reference: 16911780 - BMC Med. 2006;4:18
– reference: 19625210 - Int J Med Inform. 2009 Oct;78(10):688-703
– reference: 9794310 - JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1321-4
– reference: 15515991 - Am J Manag Care. 2004 Sep;10(9):593-8
– reference: 11986430 - Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):740-4
– reference: 19017584 - J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(4):e42
– reference: 11986460 - Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):954-6
– reference: 17627929 - J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3):e20
– reference: 19403464 - J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e12
– reference: 19321858 - N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1628-38
– reference: 15905484 - J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):530-6
– reference: 16641080 - J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 1:147-56
– reference: 15321902 - BMJ. 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):435-8
– reference: 16259859 - Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(3):195-202
– reference: 16396679 - BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:1
– reference: 9794317 - JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1353-9
– reference: 17213045 - J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(4):e26
– reference: 15808021 - Inform Prim Care. 2004;12(4):201-6
– reference: 17425798 - BMC Public Health. 2007;7:53
SSID ssj0020491
Score 2.2575836
Snippet Use of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and...
Background: Use of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between...
BackgroundUse of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage e20
SubjectTerms Appointments and Schedules
Communication
Computer mediated communication
Computerized physician order entry
Consumers
Doctors
Electronic health records
Electronic Health Records - utilization
Electronic Mail
Electronic Prescribing - statistics & numerical data
Email
Europe
Family physicians
Forecasting
Health
Health education
Health information
Health professionals
Health Services Accessibility - trends
Health status
Humans
Internet
Internet - trends
Internet - utilization
Legislation
Logistic Models
Medical personnel
Original Paper
Patient communication
Patients
Physician-Patient Relations
Physicians
Policy analysis
Polls & surveys
Population Surveillance
Prescriptions
Primary care
Professionals
Regression analysis
Sampling Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Telemedicine
Trends
Web portals
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LTxwxDI4QB8SlKo-2y0sRQlUvU5LJa8INEAghgXoAiVuUyUPdqgyI3f3_xJPswiDUXriOfUhiO7Yn9meEDgiD6fZcVl5YXnGlZJWiVl4pn_xbdLRxDv53XF3Li1t-eSfuXo36gpqwDA-cD-6wtoGqJsagnII3p0ZExcEoG7h9Y5-tJ583T6ZKqpXiXppxhJJFysM_9-Onn_BmNPA-PUj_e5Hl2wLJVx7n_DP6VEJFfJyXuIaWQreOdkujAf6OSycRnCwuJrqOVq7KY_kGuskwonjQA4JPcmEWTt4FBu1g23n8K4OrTvC4w_n3_BGGKHRWyC8NmZNNdHt-dnN6UZUhCpUThEyrxktGQojac9K2UToSqPDEWxeIYzo4FoKuFeWi7btWE8VaLlvbMGqd0-wLWu4euvAN4UC9tIS0NHrNGQtt9N5qnq7uqHlKLUfox_xwjSsI4zDo4q9JmQbIwYAcDMhhhPYXrI8ZVuM9phOQ0IIBkLD7D0k_TNEP8z_9GKGduXxNMc-JqWGqDeNS6xHCC3IyLHgtsV14mE2M6jkY5_9gESkE0I1OK_2aFWax1poIuO0SRQ1UabCZIaUb_-7hvWsNMSnd-ojdb6PVXO4gKyp20PL0aRZ2UxQ1bfd6g3kGw-Ie8g
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3daxQxEA-1gvgiWr9OWwki4svWZPO1EUSsWIpw4kMP-hay-agndU_vA_S_N7PJra4cfd2Zh2xmJjPJfPwQekEYoNtzWXlhecWVklWKWnmlfPJv0dHGOXjvmH6WZzP-6UJc7KEtxmbZwNXOqx3gSc2WV8e_fv5-lwz-LZQxJwV6_e37fHkMGaEb6GZySAoQHKZ8SCbUKQimeajQmH3kivqJ_bvCzP-rJf9xP6d30Z0SN-L3WdD30F7oDtBR6TrAL3FpK4JtxsVeD9Ctacmc30fneaYoHjWE4JNcpYWTqwHUHWw7j7_kSasrPO9wfqt_gyEk3RTy3-7M1QM0O_14_uGsKogKlROErKvGS0ZCiNpz0rZROhKo8MRbF4hjOjgWgq4V5aLtW1gTxVouW9swap3T7CHa7xZdeIxwoF5aQloaveaMhTZ6bzVP53jUPN0zJ-jVdnONK-PGAfXiyqRrB8jBgBwMyGGCng-sP_KMjV1MJyChgQHGYvcfFstLU6zM1DZQ1cQYlFOQoGxEVBxO8AZcdSQTdLiVr9mqmqkB4oZxqfUE4YGcrAxSJ7YLi83KqJ6DcX4Ni0jxgG50WumjrDDDWmsi4OhLFDVSpdHPjCnd_Gs_67vWEKDSJ9cv_Cm6nasaZEXFIdpfLzfhKAVL6_ZZbwp_AIhHGEw
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Online Communication Between Doctors and Patients in Europe: Status and Perspectives
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20551011
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2513334699
https://www.proquest.com/docview/733346344
https://www.proquest.com/docview/754139891
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2956231
https://doaj.org/article/2ae178ffe7c7407885f74adde81303f0
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELZoKyEuPMor0EYWQojLpvbau15zQQS1qpBaKtRKuVlePyA8NiWbXPj1eNbOlq2qHrjkkJmDV2PPfPbMfIPQa8Jguj0vM1tonnEhyiygVp4JG-KbN7QyBt47Tk7L4wv-aVbM0oNbm8oqNz6xc9R2YeCN_CCHQSQsXObk-8vfGUyNguxqGqGxhXYohHoo3aOf-wtXQL80sgmFc1kefP81X04gczSIQR1V_0348nqZ5D9x5-gBUpsVx3KTH5P1qp6YP9fIHP__kx6i-wmS4g9xDz1Cd1yzi_ZTQwN-g1PHElgQJ1ewi-6epKT8Y3Qe6UrxoNcET2MBGA5RDAb6YN1YfBZJXFs8b3BMA7zDgHbXSXzV-Nk-QRdHh-cfj7M0rCEzBSGrrLIlI855aTmpa18a4mhhidXGEcOkM8w5mQvKi7rrjg0SrXlZ64pRbYxkT9F2s2jcc4QdtaUmpKbeSs6Yq721WvIQIrzk4Qo7Qm835lMmMZnDQI2fKtxowNIKLK3A0iP0qle9jPQdNylNYQ_0CsC43f2xWH5V6QCrXDsqKu-dMAJyn1XhBYfgUAEK8GSE9jZGVskNtOrKwiOEe3E4wJCV0Y1brFslOg3G-S0qRYAaspJhpc_iluzXmpMCvGqQiMFmHXzMUNLMv3U04rkE7Etf3L7wl-heLJgoM1rsoe3Vcu32Aw5b1WO0JWZijHamh6dnX8bda8a4O4Dwy6u_x1k9kA
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIgEXBOW10IKFAHEJtRMnjpEQokC1pd2Kw1bam3H8oFtBtmx2hfhT_EY8sbNLUNVbr5k5OJnxzDeZF0LPSQbb7VmRmFyxhHFeJB61soQb79-cpqXW8L9jdFwMT9jnST7ZQH-6Xhgoq-xsYmuozUzDP_LdFBaRZD6YE-_OfyawNQqyq90KjaAWh_b3Lx-yNW8PPnr5vkjT_U_jD8MkbhVIdE7IIilNkRFrnTCMVJUrNLE0N8QobYnOhNWZtSLllOVV28bpKUqxolJlRpXWMHzJm_xr3vESKCHkk3WA59E2DdOLvB0ods9-TOevIVPV83ntaoCL8Oz_ZZn_-Ln92-hWBKj4fdCoO2jD1ltoJ7Y34Jc49i-BPHE0DFvo-iim6O-icRheinudJ3gvlINh79NgvQ9WtcFfwkjXBk9rHJICbzBg32Ukr9tAm3vo5Eo-8n20Wc9q-xBhS02hCKmoM4Jlma2cMUow7zCcYD6gHaBX3ceVOs41h_Ua36WPb0AOEuQgQQ4D9GzFeh6GeVzEtAcSWjHA_O32wWz-TcbrLFNlKS-ds1xzyISWueMMXEUJmMCRAdru5CujUWjkWoUHCK_I_jpDjkbVdrZsJG85MsYuYck98BCl8Cd9EBRmddaU5GBjPYX3VKn3Mn1KPT1th4qnApAwfXT5wZ-iG8Px6EgeHRwfPkY3QylFkdB8G20u5ku74xHaonrSXguMvl71PfwL9YxU8Q
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3LbtQw0KqKVHFBUF4LLVgIEJewTuLEMRJClLJqKa16aKW9GcePsqjNls2uEL_G1zGTOLsEVb31mpmD43l7XoS8ZClut-d5ZDPNIy5EHoHXyiNhwb55ExfG4HvH4VG-d8q_jLPxGvnT9cJgWWWnExtFbacG38iHCS4iSSGYk0MfyiKOd0cfLn9GuEEKM63dOo2WRQ7c718QvtXv93eB1q-SZPT55NNeFDYMRCZjbB4VNk-Zc15azsrS54a5OLPMauOYSaUzqXMyETHPyqalEyBa87zURRprY3AQE6j_WyIFswmyJMarYA8877idZAQ6IR_-uJjM3mLWqmf_mjUBV_m2_5do_mPzRnfJneCs0o8td90ja67aJNuh1YG-pqGXCWlLg5LYJBuHIV1_n5y0g0xprwuF7rSlYRTsG676obqy9Lgd71rTSUXbBME7in7wIoBXLaH1A3J6I5f8kKxX08o9JtTFNteMlbG3kqepK721WnIwHl5yCG4H5E13ucqEGee4auNcQayDdFBIB4V0GJAXS9TLdrDHVUg7SKElAs7ibj5MZ2cqiLZKtItF4b0TRmBWtMi84Gg2CvQPPBuQrY6-KiiIWq3YeUDoEgyijfkaXbnpolaiwUg5vwYlAydEFhJO-qhlmOVZE5ahvgWI6LFS72f6kGryvRkwnkj0iuMn1x_8OdkACVRf948OnpLbbVVFHsXZFlmfzxZuG5y1efmskQpKvt20GP4FagtZJw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Online+Communication+Between+Doctors+and+Patients+in+Europe%3A+Status+and+Perspectives&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+medical+Internet+research&rft.au=Santana%2C+Silvina&rft.au=Berthold+Lausen+2&rft.au=Maria+Bujnowska-Fedak+3&rft.au=Catherine+Chronaki+4&rft.date=2010-06-15&rft.pub=Gunther+Eysenbach+MD+MPH%2C+Associate+Professor&rft.eissn=1438-8871&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2Fjmir.1281&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon