Revisiting foraging approaches in neuroscience

• Published in: Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 225 - 230
• Main Authors: Hall-McMaster, Sam, Luyckx, Fabrice
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.04.2019; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animal cognition; Animals; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Brain - physiology; Choice Behavior; Cognitive Psychology; Computational neuroscience; Decision making; Ecology; Humans; Mars; Memory; Nature; Nervous system; Neurons; Neurosciences; Optimal foraging; Physiology; Population biology; Psychology; Reinforcement; Reward; Theoretical Review; Theory; Foraging theory; Sequential decision-making; Reward-maximization
• DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-00682-z
• ISSN: 1530-7026; 1531-135X

Many complex real-world decisions, such as deciding which house to buy or whether to switch jobs, involve trying to maximize reward across a sequence of choices. Optimal Foraging Theory is well suited to study these kinds of choices because it provides formal models for reward-maximization in sequential situations. In this article, we review recent insights from foraging neuroscience, behavioral ecology, and computational modelling. We find that a commonly used approach in foraging neuroscience, in which choice items are encountered at random, does not reflect the way animals direct their foraging efforts in certain real-world settings, nor does it reflect efficient reward-maximizing behavior. Based on this, we propose that task designs allowing subjects to encounter choice items strategically will further improve the ecological validity of foraging approaches used in neuroscience, as well as give rise to new behavioral and neural predictions that deepen our understanding of sequential, value-based choice.