Treatment Outcomes of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for Ruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms: The Preservation of Branches May Improve the Prognosis

Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early treatment following onset. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization is selected as a treatment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Neuroendovascular Therapy Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 14 - 23
Main Authors Maruyama, Takumi, Masuko, Yu, Ayabe, Junichi, Tsuchiya, Yusuke, Takase, Kana, Tanaka, Yoshihide, Mishima, Hiroyuki, Watanabe, Masahide
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1882-4072
2186-2494
DOI10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0124

Cover

Abstract Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early treatment following onset. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization is selected as a treatment option according to the individual patient condition. This report is a retrospective examination evaluating the treatment outcomes for rVADA.Methods: The subjects were 20 rVADA patients (16 men and 4 women) who underwent endovascular treatment at our institution. The mean patient age was 52.9 years. Ten patients each were allocated to the PAO group and SAC group. We evaluated and compared the following parameters: presence of hemorrhagic complications, presence of ischemic complications, requirement of retreatment, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after 90 days.Results: The reasons for selecting SAC were contralateral occlusion or a small diameter in three patients, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) involvement in three patients, perforating artery from dissected lesion in five patients, and anterior spinal artery in one patient. There was no rebleeding in any patient. Symptomatic ischemic complications were observed in four patients in the PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Hyper-intense lesions in the brainstem on MRI DWI were noted in five patients in PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Retreatment was required for three patients in the PAO group and for four in the SAC group. Favorable outcomes (GOS 4, 5) after 90 days were observed for three patients in the PAO group and for eight patients in the SAC group (p = 0.0257).Conclusion: SAC that can preserve branches is a useful treatment option for rVADA. Further studies on a greater number of subjects are required to establish the optimal dose of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and for stent selection.
AbstractList Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early treatment following onset. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization is selected as a treatment option according to the individual patient condition. This report is a retrospective examination evaluating the treatment outcomes for rVADA. Methods: The subjects were 20 rVADA patients (16 men and 4 women) who underwent endovascular treatment at our institution. The mean patient age was 52.9 years. Ten patients each were allocated to the PAO group and SAC group. We evaluated and compared the following parameters: presence of hemorrhagic complications, presence of ischemic complications, requirement of retreatment, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after 90 days. Results: The reasons for selecting SAC were contralateral occlusion or a small diameter in three patients, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) involvement in three patients, perforating artery from dissected lesion in five patients, and anterior spinal artery in one patient. There was no rebleeding in any patient. Symptomatic ischemic complications were observed in four patients in the PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Hyper-intense lesions in the brainstem on MRI DWI were noted in five patients in PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Retreatment was required for three patients in the PAO group and for four in the SAC group. Favorable outcomes (GOS 4, 5) after 90 days were observed for three patients in the PAO group and for eight patients in the SAC group (p=0.0257). Conclusion: SAC that can preserve branches is a useful treatment option for rVADA. Further studies on a greater number of subjects are required to establish the optimal dose of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and for stent selection.
Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early treatment following onset. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization is selected as a treatment option according to the individual patient condition. This report is a retrospective examination evaluating the treatment outcomes for rVADA. The subjects were 20 rVADA patients (16 men and 4 women) who underwent endovascular treatment at our institution. The mean patient age was 52.9 years. Ten patients each were allocated to the PAO group and SAC group. We evaluated and compared the following parameters: presence of hemorrhagic complications, presence of ischemic complications, requirement of retreatment, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after 90 days. The reasons for selecting SAC were contralateral occlusion or a small diameter in three patients, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) involvement in three patients, perforating artery from dissected lesion in five patients, and anterior spinal artery in one patient. There was no rebleeding in any patient. Symptomatic ischemic complications were observed in four patients in the PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Hyper-intense lesions in the brainstem on MRI DWI were noted in five patients in PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Retreatment was required for three patients in the PAO group and for four in the SAC group. Favorable outcomes (GOS 4, 5) after 90 days were observed for three patients in the PAO group and for eight patients in the SAC group (p = 0.0257). SAC that can preserve branches is a useful treatment option for rVADA. Further studies on a greater number of subjects are required to establish the optimal dose of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and for stent selection.
Author Watanabe, Masahide
Mishima, Hiroyuki
Tsuchiya, Yusuke
Masuko, Yu
Takase, Kana
Tanaka, Yoshihide
Maruyama, Takumi
Ayabe, Junichi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Maruyama, Takumi
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Masuko, Yu
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Ayabe, Junichi
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Tsuchiya, Yusuke
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Takase, Kana
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Tanaka, Yoshihide
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Mishima, Hiroyuki
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Watanabe, Masahide
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37503455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVUduO0zAQtdAitiz7Abwg_0CKb7nxgkpZlpUWLYLCq-U4k9ZVYle2U6n8DX-KQ6AsfpgZec7FnnmOLqyzgNBLSpZ5WZev9xbi0qklI7TOCGXiCVowWhUZE7W4QAtaVSwTpGSX6DqEPUmnILSi4hm65GVOuMjzBfq58aDiADbihzFqN0DArsNfY7rJViGYEKHFa2d6fDM0rjc_VDTO4s55_GU8xNGn9nfwERqverxKhT_h9yYE0NHYLV5ZGP0pDOEN3uwAf_YQwB9nkWT0ziurd8n0kzrhu-Hg3RFw_A10W-uS_wv0tFN9gOs_-Qp9-3CzWX_M7h9u79ar-0yLuhYZVxogFwU0rBFQVbqhtYayUTnnLS-6hui8ZTXTteg4FVViqaJs2kqUFSsJ51fo7ax7GJsBWp0GkH4kD94Myp-kU0b-37FmJ7fuKCnhJSnopPDqscKZ-nfaCUBngPYuBA_dGUKJnJYqp6UmKzktVU5LTZzbmZMUjVa9s72xIPdu9DaNQ-oun0i7RGFUEkJzMiU-lSIFxnnJk1zxT2kfotrC2Vv5aHQPszfNJZ3C4zecEXqnvATLfwHmwcpJ
Cites_doi 10.1177/1591019917706190
10.1007/s003950050180
10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0025
10.3171/jns.2001.94.5.0712
10.3171/jns.2003.99.6.0960
10.3171/jns.1990.72.2.0183
10.1097/00006123-199505000-00003
10.1007/s00701-016-2788-2
10.1177/159101990801400107
10.3171/jns.1991.75.2.0299
10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0259
10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012309
10.3174/ajnr.A4542
10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.184
10.3174/ajnr.A4360
10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0191
10.1007/s10143-018-0999-0
10.3171/2012.9.JNS12566
10.3171/2017.2.JNS162916
10.1007/s11547-016-0686-6
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.
2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
– notice: 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.
– notice: 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021
CorporateAuthor Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital
Department of Neurosurgery
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Department of Neurosurgery
– name: Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
5PM
DOI 10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0124
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
DatabaseTitleList

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate Ayabe J, et al
EISSN 2186-2494
EndPage 23
ExternalDocumentID PMC10370613
37503455
10_5797_jnet_oa_2019_0124
cf5jneth_2021_001501_003_0014_00233732016
article_jnet_15_1_15_oa_2019_0124_article_char_en
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ABDBF
ABJNI
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
GROUPED_DOAJ
JMI
JSF
JSH
KQ8
MOJWN
OK1
RJT
RPM
RZJ
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-3acee546eb2b4e88cb19ce7ba533d36fb0c5d292c94f3148c49a67bd847827033
ISSN 1882-4072
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:36:57 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:51:01 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:32:34 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 16:15:00 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:31:08 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords treatment results
stent-assisted coil embolization
ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm
endovascular treatment
preservation of branches
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4994-3acee546eb2b4e88cb19ce7ba533d36fb0c5d292c94f3148c49a67bd847827033
Notes Email: jayabe7651@gmail.com
OpenAccessLink http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0124
PMID 37503455
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10370613
pubmed_primary_37503455
crossref_primary_10_5797_jnet_oa_2019_0124
medicalonline_journals_cf5jneth_2021_001501_003_0014_00233732016
jstage_primary_article_jnet_15_1_15_oa_2019_0124_article_char_en
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2021
  text: 2021-00-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
PublicationTitle Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy
PublicationTitleAlternate JNET
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
Publisher_xml – name: The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
References 10) Aihara M, Naito I, Shimizu T, et al: Predictive factors of medullary infarction after endovascular internal trapping using coils for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2018; 129: 107–113.
7) Cho DY, Choi JH, Kim BS, et al: Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes of diverse endovascular treatments in vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm involving the origin of PICA. World Neurosurg 2019; 121: e22–e31.
11) Mizutani T, Kojima H, Asamoto S, et al: Pathological mechanism and three-dimensional structure of cerebral dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2001; 94: 712–717.
16) Guan J, Li G, Kong X, et al: Endovascular treatment for ruptured and unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 558–563.
9) Endo H, Matsumoto Y, Kondo R, et al: Medullary infarction as a poor prognostic factor after internal coil trapping of a ruptured vertebral artery dissection. J Neurosurg 2013; 118: 131–139.
17) Muto M, Giurazza F, Ambrosanio G, et al: Stent-assisted coiling in ruptured cerebral aneurysms: multi-center experience in acute phase. Radiol Med 2017; 122: 43–52.
14) Mahmood A, Dujovny M, Torche M, et al: Microvascular anatomy of foramen caecum medullae oblongatae. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 299–304.
15) Sönmez Ö, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, et al: Deconstructive and reconstructive techniques in treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 1293–1298.
1) Yamaura A, Watanabe Y, Saeki N: Dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 183–188.
5) Hamada J, Kai Y, Morioka M, et al: Multimodal treatment of ruptured dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery during the acute stage. J Neurosurg 2003; 99: 960–966.
4) Iihara K, Sakai N, Murao K, et al: Dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery: a management strategy. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 259–267.
2) Mizutani T, Aruga T, Kirino T, et al: Recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage from untreated ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1995; 36: 905–911; discussion 912–913.
12) Nakamura H, Fujinaka T, Nishida T, et al: Endovascular therapy for ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: results from nationwide, retrospective, multi-center registries in Japan (JR-NET3). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2019; 59: 10–18.
8) Shimada K, Tanaka M, Kadooka K, et al: Efficacy of high-resolution cone-beam CT in the evaluation of perforators in vertebral artery dissection. Interv Neuroradiol 2017; 23: 350–356.
6) Ota T, Sato M, Amano T, et al: Reconstructive endovascular treatment of ruptured vertebral artery dissection involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158: 1089–1093.
20) Indolfi C, Esposito G, Stabile E, et al: A new rat model of small vessel stenting. Basic Res Cardiol 2000; 95: 179–185.
19) Cagnazzo F, Di Carlo DT, Petrella G, et.al: Ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage in patients on antiplatelet therapy for endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 43: 397–406.
13) Mercier PH, Brassier G, Fournier H-D, et al: Vascular microanatomy of the pontomedullary junction, posterior inferior cerebellar arteries, and the lateral spinal arteries. Interv Neuroradiol 2008; 14: 49–58.
18) Bechan RS, Sprengers ME, Majoie CB, et al: Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: complications in acutely ruptured versus unruptured aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 502–507.
3) Yamada M, Kitahara T, Kuruta A, et.al: Intracranial vertebral artery dissection with subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2004; 101: 25–30.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
10
References_xml – reference: 13) Mercier PH, Brassier G, Fournier H-D, et al: Vascular microanatomy of the pontomedullary junction, posterior inferior cerebellar arteries, and the lateral spinal arteries. Interv Neuroradiol 2008; 14: 49–58.
– reference: 4) Iihara K, Sakai N, Murao K, et al: Dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery: a management strategy. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 259–267.
– reference: 8) Shimada K, Tanaka M, Kadooka K, et al: Efficacy of high-resolution cone-beam CT in the evaluation of perforators in vertebral artery dissection. Interv Neuroradiol 2017; 23: 350–356.
– reference: 18) Bechan RS, Sprengers ME, Majoie CB, et al: Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: complications in acutely ruptured versus unruptured aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 502–507.
– reference: 19) Cagnazzo F, Di Carlo DT, Petrella G, et.al: Ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage in patients on antiplatelet therapy for endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 43: 397–406.
– reference: 7) Cho DY, Choi JH, Kim BS, et al: Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes of diverse endovascular treatments in vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm involving the origin of PICA. World Neurosurg 2019; 121: e22–e31.
– reference: 11) Mizutani T, Kojima H, Asamoto S, et al: Pathological mechanism and three-dimensional structure of cerebral dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2001; 94: 712–717.
– reference: 17) Muto M, Giurazza F, Ambrosanio G, et al: Stent-assisted coiling in ruptured cerebral aneurysms: multi-center experience in acute phase. Radiol Med 2017; 122: 43–52.
– reference: 15) Sönmez Ö, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, et al: Deconstructive and reconstructive techniques in treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 1293–1298.
– reference: 1) Yamaura A, Watanabe Y, Saeki N: Dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 183–188.
– reference: 3) Yamada M, Kitahara T, Kuruta A, et.al: Intracranial vertebral artery dissection with subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2004; 101: 25–30.
– reference: 5) Hamada J, Kai Y, Morioka M, et al: Multimodal treatment of ruptured dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery during the acute stage. J Neurosurg 2003; 99: 960–966.
– reference: 6) Ota T, Sato M, Amano T, et al: Reconstructive endovascular treatment of ruptured vertebral artery dissection involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158: 1089–1093.
– reference: 12) Nakamura H, Fujinaka T, Nishida T, et al: Endovascular therapy for ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: results from nationwide, retrospective, multi-center registries in Japan (JR-NET3). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2019; 59: 10–18.
– reference: 20) Indolfi C, Esposito G, Stabile E, et al: A new rat model of small vessel stenting. Basic Res Cardiol 2000; 95: 179–185.
– reference: 9) Endo H, Matsumoto Y, Kondo R, et al: Medullary infarction as a poor prognostic factor after internal coil trapping of a ruptured vertebral artery dissection. J Neurosurg 2013; 118: 131–139.
– reference: 2) Mizutani T, Aruga T, Kirino T, et al: Recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage from untreated ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1995; 36: 905–911; discussion 912–913.
– reference: 16) Guan J, Li G, Kong X, et al: Endovascular treatment for ruptured and unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 558–563.
– reference: 10) Aihara M, Naito I, Shimizu T, et al: Predictive factors of medullary infarction after endovascular internal trapping using coils for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2018; 129: 107–113.
– reference: 14) Mahmood A, Dujovny M, Torche M, et al: Microvascular anatomy of foramen caecum medullae oblongatae. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 299–304.
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1177/1591019917706190
– ident: 20
  doi: 10.1007/s003950050180
– ident: 3
  doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0025
– ident: 11
  doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.5.0712
– ident: 5
  doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.6.0960
– ident: 1
  doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.2.0183
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.1097/00006123-199505000-00003
– ident: 6
  doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2788-2
– ident: 13
  doi: 10.1177/159101990801400107
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.75.2.0299
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0259
– ident: 16
  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012309
– ident: 18
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4542
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.184
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4360
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0191
– ident: 19
  doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-0999-0
– ident: 9
  doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12566
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS162916
– ident: 17
  doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0686-6
SSID ssj0000601814
ssib040212986
ssib051641539
ssib058493112
ssib002919271
Score 2.1301813
Snippet Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and...
Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early...
SourceID pubmedcentral
pubmed
crossref
medicalonline
jstage
SourceType Open Access Repository
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 14
SubjectTerms endovascular treatment
Original
preservation of branches
ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm
stent-assisted coil embolization
treatment results
Title Treatment Outcomes of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for Ruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms: The Preservation of Branches May Improve the Prognosis
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jnet/15/1/15_oa.2019-0124/_article/-char/en
http://mol.medicalonline.jp/library/journal/download?GoodsID=cf5jneth/2021/001501/003&name=0014-0023e
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37503455
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10370613
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy, 2021, Vol.15(1), pp.14-23
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Pb9MwFLfK4ICEEIh_5c_kAyeqDJLYScqJgYoqpI4JNjROlp24arY2mZrkUA58Fz4bX4T37CRNNiYxLm6UOM9p3i_28_N7PxPyMowk5yqRTowZMizhkRMFoeckcQjTERdTLU2U70EwPWafTvjJYPC7E7VUlWov_vHXvJL_0SqcA71iluw1NNsKhRNwDPqFEjQM5b_puI0S_1yV0IAlkP0KZnDpwHtHDSbwxafL0WSl8mWdcmkiC79U57h2kIy-6XWJi8dL9NPr9Qb5OAvsBdFdgmyXm2JVNLEZGLDReHGxqfe4LccCmp3Jzcj6J7QxZQ_XOUbwpcUVxq-h0dRZso2ELfv0Bvsbqax7H9NXFunW8Q_WbH1pJgu5SJNt9C7601bGGp6m63xTnbW3HRW46cvGXPteFdWZ7ro7bPZ03TfjZAD53OzQZc7hjloOzCBZr0Pnl4Bre2ebrlqP8zbN-eIIwkPDTHya6XIvR14qzPFyPbYdLpsQgQujaBvbCLMqFCJQhMilQBECRdwgN70wdHnHpWTNBeRMM9EPzR-0q-8o5fWlB-nZT7dOYQqB3BB3VnZZz9KrdKypfqRvx3Q6ukfu1mqn-xbA98lAZw_Irxa8tAEvzee0D16K4KVd8FIAL23AS1vwUgteugUvbcH7lgJ0aRe62FADXQrQpTV0aWkq1tB9SI4_To4-TJ16vxAnZshw7Uuw-DgLtPIU01EUK3cc61BJmNIkfjBXb2KeeGMvHrO577II7pJBqBIw0CIPRj7_EdnJ8kw_IRQEqcibK82QzzF2oxjGKsUCyfxQMiaH5FWjBXFuaWHElYofkndWT23VusewVV0uXCy6t7Q1MPcSujoQ0dOwqHuhQsRzjlIWAj8WYRhD8cfHQybQJPdDH-QGQ_LYYqF9Ch9jGBjnQxL1UNJWQOr5_pUsXRgKeswuxpnA0-u8h2fkNj6kdWA-JzvlutIvwKQv1a5xhUE5-zmB8uBwtms-kj-OLwYp
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment+Outcomes+of+Stent-Assisted+Coil+Embolization+for+Ruptured+Vertebral+Artery+Dissecting+Aneurysms%3A+The+Preservation+of+Branches+May+Improve+the+Prognosis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neuroendovascular+therapy&rft.au=Ayabe%2C+Junichi&rft.au=Watanabe%2C+Masahide&rft.au=Mishima%2C+Hiroyuki&rft.au=Tsuchiya%2C+Yusuke&rft.date=2021&rft.issn=1882-4072&rft.eissn=2186-2494&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=23&rft_id=info:doi/10.5797%2Fjnet.oa.2019-0124&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_5797_jnet_oa_2019_0124
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1882-4072&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1882-4072&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1882-4072&client=summon