Treatment Outcomes of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for Ruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms: The Preservation of Branches May Improve the Prognosis
Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early treatment following onset. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization is selected as a treatment...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 14 - 23 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1882-4072 2186-2494 |
DOI | 10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0124 |
Cover
Abstract | Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early treatment following onset. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization is selected as a treatment option according to the individual patient condition. This report is a retrospective examination evaluating the treatment outcomes for rVADA.Methods: The subjects were 20 rVADA patients (16 men and 4 women) who underwent endovascular treatment at our institution. The mean patient age was 52.9 years. Ten patients each were allocated to the PAO group and SAC group. We evaluated and compared the following parameters: presence of hemorrhagic complications, presence of ischemic complications, requirement of retreatment, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after 90 days.Results: The reasons for selecting SAC were contralateral occlusion or a small diameter in three patients, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) involvement in three patients, perforating artery from dissected lesion in five patients, and anterior spinal artery in one patient. There was no rebleeding in any patient. Symptomatic ischemic complications were observed in four patients in the PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Hyper-intense lesions in the brainstem on MRI DWI were noted in five patients in PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Retreatment was required for three patients in the PAO group and for four in the SAC group. Favorable outcomes (GOS 4, 5) after 90 days were observed for three patients in the PAO group and for eight patients in the SAC group (p = 0.0257).Conclusion: SAC that can preserve branches is a useful treatment option for rVADA. Further studies on a greater number of subjects are required to establish the optimal dose of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and for stent selection. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early treatment following onset. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization is selected as a treatment option according to the individual patient condition. This report is a retrospective examination evaluating the treatment outcomes for rVADA. Methods: The subjects were 20 rVADA patients (16 men and 4 women) who underwent endovascular treatment at our institution. The mean patient age was 52.9 years. Ten patients each were allocated to the PAO group and SAC group. We evaluated and compared the following parameters: presence of hemorrhagic complications, presence of ischemic complications, requirement of retreatment, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after 90 days. Results: The reasons for selecting SAC were contralateral occlusion or a small diameter in three patients, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) involvement in three patients, perforating artery from dissected lesion in five patients, and anterior spinal artery in one patient. There was no rebleeding in any patient. Symptomatic ischemic complications were observed in four patients in the PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Hyper-intense lesions in the brainstem on MRI DWI were noted in five patients in PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Retreatment was required for three patients in the PAO group and for four in the SAC group. Favorable outcomes (GOS 4, 5) after 90 days were observed for three patients in the PAO group and for eight patients in the SAC group (p=0.0257). Conclusion: SAC that can preserve branches is a useful treatment option for rVADA. Further studies on a greater number of subjects are required to establish the optimal dose of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and for stent selection. Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early treatment following onset. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization is selected as a treatment option according to the individual patient condition. This report is a retrospective examination evaluating the treatment outcomes for rVADA. The subjects were 20 rVADA patients (16 men and 4 women) who underwent endovascular treatment at our institution. The mean patient age was 52.9 years. Ten patients each were allocated to the PAO group and SAC group. We evaluated and compared the following parameters: presence of hemorrhagic complications, presence of ischemic complications, requirement of retreatment, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after 90 days. The reasons for selecting SAC were contralateral occlusion or a small diameter in three patients, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) involvement in three patients, perforating artery from dissected lesion in five patients, and anterior spinal artery in one patient. There was no rebleeding in any patient. Symptomatic ischemic complications were observed in four patients in the PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Hyper-intense lesions in the brainstem on MRI DWI were noted in five patients in PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Retreatment was required for three patients in the PAO group and for four in the SAC group. Favorable outcomes (GOS 4, 5) after 90 days were observed for three patients in the PAO group and for eight patients in the SAC group (p = 0.0257). SAC that can preserve branches is a useful treatment option for rVADA. Further studies on a greater number of subjects are required to establish the optimal dose of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and for stent selection. |
Author | Watanabe, Masahide Mishima, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya, Yusuke Masuko, Yu Takase, Kana Tanaka, Yoshihide Maruyama, Takumi Ayabe, Junichi |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Maruyama, Takumi organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Masuko, Yu organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Ayabe, Junichi organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Tsuchiya, Yusuke organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Takase, Kana organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Tanaka, Yoshihide organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Mishima, Hiroyuki organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Watanabe, Masahide organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37503455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVUduO0zAQtdAitiz7Abwg_0CKb7nxgkpZlpUWLYLCq-U4k9ZVYle2U6n8DX-KQ6AsfpgZec7FnnmOLqyzgNBLSpZ5WZev9xbi0qklI7TOCGXiCVowWhUZE7W4QAtaVSwTpGSX6DqEPUmnILSi4hm65GVOuMjzBfq58aDiADbihzFqN0DArsNfY7rJViGYEKHFa2d6fDM0rjc_VDTO4s55_GU8xNGn9nfwERqverxKhT_h9yYE0NHYLV5ZGP0pDOEN3uwAf_YQwB9nkWT0ziurd8n0kzrhu-Hg3RFw_A10W-uS_wv0tFN9gOs_-Qp9-3CzWX_M7h9u79ar-0yLuhYZVxogFwU0rBFQVbqhtYayUTnnLS-6hui8ZTXTteg4FVViqaJs2kqUFSsJ51fo7ax7GJsBWp0GkH4kD94Myp-kU0b-37FmJ7fuKCnhJSnopPDqscKZ-nfaCUBngPYuBA_dGUKJnJYqp6UmKzktVU5LTZzbmZMUjVa9s72xIPdu9DaNQ-oun0i7RGFUEkJzMiU-lSIFxnnJk1zxT2kfotrC2Vv5aHQPszfNJZ3C4zecEXqnvATLfwHmwcpJ |
Cites_doi | 10.1177/1591019917706190 10.1007/s003950050180 10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0025 10.3171/jns.2001.94.5.0712 10.3171/jns.2003.99.6.0960 10.3171/jns.1990.72.2.0183 10.1097/00006123-199505000-00003 10.1007/s00701-016-2788-2 10.1177/159101990801400107 10.3171/jns.1991.75.2.0299 10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0259 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012309 10.3174/ajnr.A4542 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.184 10.3174/ajnr.A4360 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0191 10.1007/s10143-018-0999-0 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12566 10.3171/2017.2.JNS162916 10.1007/s11547-016-0686-6 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy. 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy – notice: 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy. – notice: 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021 |
CorporateAuthor | Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital Department of Neurosurgery |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Department of Neurosurgery – name: Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 5PM |
DOI | 10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0124 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Ayabe J, et al |
EISSN | 2186-2494 |
EndPage | 23 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC10370613 37503455 10_5797_jnet_oa_2019_0124 cf5jneth_2021_001501_003_0014_00233732016 article_jnet_15_1_15_oa_2019_0124_article_char_en |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | ABDBF ABJNI ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS GROUPED_DOAJ JMI JSF JSH KQ8 MOJWN OK1 RJT RPM RZJ AAYXX CITATION NPM 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-3acee546eb2b4e88cb19ce7ba533d36fb0c5d292c94f3148c49a67bd847827033 |
ISSN | 1882-4072 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:36:57 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:51:01 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:32:34 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 16:15:00 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 06:31:08 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | treatment results stent-assisted coil embolization ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm endovascular treatment preservation of branches |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4994-3acee546eb2b4e88cb19ce7ba533d36fb0c5d292c94f3148c49a67bd847827033 |
Notes | Email: jayabe7651@gmail.com |
OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0124 |
PMID | 37503455 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10370613 pubmed_primary_37503455 crossref_primary_10_5797_jnet_oa_2019_0124 medicalonline_journals_cf5jneth_2021_001501_003_0014_00233732016 jstage_primary_article_jnet_15_1_15_oa_2019_0124_article_char_en |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2021 text: 2021-00-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Japan |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Japan |
PublicationTitle | Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | JNET |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy |
References | 10) Aihara M, Naito I, Shimizu T, et al: Predictive factors of medullary infarction after endovascular internal trapping using coils for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2018; 129: 107–113. 7) Cho DY, Choi JH, Kim BS, et al: Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes of diverse endovascular treatments in vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm involving the origin of PICA. World Neurosurg 2019; 121: e22–e31. 11) Mizutani T, Kojima H, Asamoto S, et al: Pathological mechanism and three-dimensional structure of cerebral dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2001; 94: 712–717. 16) Guan J, Li G, Kong X, et al: Endovascular treatment for ruptured and unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 558–563. 9) Endo H, Matsumoto Y, Kondo R, et al: Medullary infarction as a poor prognostic factor after internal coil trapping of a ruptured vertebral artery dissection. J Neurosurg 2013; 118: 131–139. 17) Muto M, Giurazza F, Ambrosanio G, et al: Stent-assisted coiling in ruptured cerebral aneurysms: multi-center experience in acute phase. Radiol Med 2017; 122: 43–52. 14) Mahmood A, Dujovny M, Torche M, et al: Microvascular anatomy of foramen caecum medullae oblongatae. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 299–304. 15) Sönmez Ö, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, et al: Deconstructive and reconstructive techniques in treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 1293–1298. 1) Yamaura A, Watanabe Y, Saeki N: Dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 183–188. 5) Hamada J, Kai Y, Morioka M, et al: Multimodal treatment of ruptured dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery during the acute stage. J Neurosurg 2003; 99: 960–966. 4) Iihara K, Sakai N, Murao K, et al: Dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery: a management strategy. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 259–267. 2) Mizutani T, Aruga T, Kirino T, et al: Recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage from untreated ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1995; 36: 905–911; discussion 912–913. 12) Nakamura H, Fujinaka T, Nishida T, et al: Endovascular therapy for ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: results from nationwide, retrospective, multi-center registries in Japan (JR-NET3). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2019; 59: 10–18. 8) Shimada K, Tanaka M, Kadooka K, et al: Efficacy of high-resolution cone-beam CT in the evaluation of perforators in vertebral artery dissection. Interv Neuroradiol 2017; 23: 350–356. 6) Ota T, Sato M, Amano T, et al: Reconstructive endovascular treatment of ruptured vertebral artery dissection involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158: 1089–1093. 20) Indolfi C, Esposito G, Stabile E, et al: A new rat model of small vessel stenting. Basic Res Cardiol 2000; 95: 179–185. 19) Cagnazzo F, Di Carlo DT, Petrella G, et.al: Ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage in patients on antiplatelet therapy for endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 43: 397–406. 13) Mercier PH, Brassier G, Fournier H-D, et al: Vascular microanatomy of the pontomedullary junction, posterior inferior cerebellar arteries, and the lateral spinal arteries. Interv Neuroradiol 2008; 14: 49–58. 18) Bechan RS, Sprengers ME, Majoie CB, et al: Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: complications in acutely ruptured versus unruptured aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 502–507. 3) Yamada M, Kitahara T, Kuruta A, et.al: Intracranial vertebral artery dissection with subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2004; 101: 25–30. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 10 |
References_xml | – reference: 13) Mercier PH, Brassier G, Fournier H-D, et al: Vascular microanatomy of the pontomedullary junction, posterior inferior cerebellar arteries, and the lateral spinal arteries. Interv Neuroradiol 2008; 14: 49–58. – reference: 4) Iihara K, Sakai N, Murao K, et al: Dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery: a management strategy. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 259–267. – reference: 8) Shimada K, Tanaka M, Kadooka K, et al: Efficacy of high-resolution cone-beam CT in the evaluation of perforators in vertebral artery dissection. Interv Neuroradiol 2017; 23: 350–356. – reference: 18) Bechan RS, Sprengers ME, Majoie CB, et al: Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: complications in acutely ruptured versus unruptured aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 502–507. – reference: 19) Cagnazzo F, Di Carlo DT, Petrella G, et.al: Ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage in patients on antiplatelet therapy for endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 43: 397–406. – reference: 7) Cho DY, Choi JH, Kim BS, et al: Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes of diverse endovascular treatments in vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm involving the origin of PICA. World Neurosurg 2019; 121: e22–e31. – reference: 11) Mizutani T, Kojima H, Asamoto S, et al: Pathological mechanism and three-dimensional structure of cerebral dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2001; 94: 712–717. – reference: 17) Muto M, Giurazza F, Ambrosanio G, et al: Stent-assisted coiling in ruptured cerebral aneurysms: multi-center experience in acute phase. Radiol Med 2017; 122: 43–52. – reference: 15) Sönmez Ö, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, et al: Deconstructive and reconstructive techniques in treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 1293–1298. – reference: 1) Yamaura A, Watanabe Y, Saeki N: Dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 183–188. – reference: 3) Yamada M, Kitahara T, Kuruta A, et.al: Intracranial vertebral artery dissection with subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2004; 101: 25–30. – reference: 5) Hamada J, Kai Y, Morioka M, et al: Multimodal treatment of ruptured dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery during the acute stage. J Neurosurg 2003; 99: 960–966. – reference: 6) Ota T, Sato M, Amano T, et al: Reconstructive endovascular treatment of ruptured vertebral artery dissection involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158: 1089–1093. – reference: 12) Nakamura H, Fujinaka T, Nishida T, et al: Endovascular therapy for ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: results from nationwide, retrospective, multi-center registries in Japan (JR-NET3). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2019; 59: 10–18. – reference: 20) Indolfi C, Esposito G, Stabile E, et al: A new rat model of small vessel stenting. Basic Res Cardiol 2000; 95: 179–185. – reference: 9) Endo H, Matsumoto Y, Kondo R, et al: Medullary infarction as a poor prognostic factor after internal coil trapping of a ruptured vertebral artery dissection. J Neurosurg 2013; 118: 131–139. – reference: 2) Mizutani T, Aruga T, Kirino T, et al: Recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage from untreated ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1995; 36: 905–911; discussion 912–913. – reference: 16) Guan J, Li G, Kong X, et al: Endovascular treatment for ruptured and unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 558–563. – reference: 10) Aihara M, Naito I, Shimizu T, et al: Predictive factors of medullary infarction after endovascular internal trapping using coils for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2018; 129: 107–113. – reference: 14) Mahmood A, Dujovny M, Torche M, et al: Microvascular anatomy of foramen caecum medullae oblongatae. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 299–304. – ident: 8 doi: 10.1177/1591019917706190 – ident: 20 doi: 10.1007/s003950050180 – ident: 3 doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0025 – ident: 11 doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.5.0712 – ident: 5 doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.6.0960 – ident: 1 doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.2.0183 – ident: 2 doi: 10.1097/00006123-199505000-00003 – ident: 6 doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2788-2 – ident: 13 doi: 10.1177/159101990801400107 – ident: 14 doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.75.2.0299 – ident: 4 doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0259 – ident: 16 doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012309 – ident: 18 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4542 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.184 – ident: 15 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4360 – ident: 12 doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0191 – ident: 19 doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-0999-0 – ident: 9 doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12566 – ident: 10 doi: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS162916 – ident: 17 doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0686-6 |
SSID | ssj0000601814 ssib040212986 ssib051641539 ssib058493112 ssib002919271 |
Score | 2.1301813 |
Snippet | Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and... Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral pubmed crossref medicalonline jstage |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 14 |
SubjectTerms | endovascular treatment Original preservation of branches ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm stent-assisted coil embolization treatment results |
Title | Treatment Outcomes of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for Ruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms: The Preservation of Branches May Improve the Prognosis |
URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jnet/15/1/15_oa.2019-0124/_article/-char/en http://mol.medicalonline.jp/library/journal/download?GoodsID=cf5jneth/2021/001501/003&name=0014-0023e https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37503455 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10370613 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy, 2021, Vol.15(1), pp.14-23 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Pb9MwFLfK4ICEEIh_5c_kAyeqDJLYScqJgYoqpI4JNjROlp24arY2mZrkUA58Fz4bX4T37CRNNiYxLm6UOM9p3i_28_N7PxPyMowk5yqRTowZMizhkRMFoeckcQjTERdTLU2U70EwPWafTvjJYPC7E7VUlWov_vHXvJL_0SqcA71iluw1NNsKhRNwDPqFEjQM5b_puI0S_1yV0IAlkP0KZnDpwHtHDSbwxafL0WSl8mWdcmkiC79U57h2kIy-6XWJi8dL9NPr9Qb5OAvsBdFdgmyXm2JVNLEZGLDReHGxqfe4LccCmp3Jzcj6J7QxZQ_XOUbwpcUVxq-h0dRZso2ELfv0Bvsbqax7H9NXFunW8Q_WbH1pJgu5SJNt9C7601bGGp6m63xTnbW3HRW46cvGXPteFdWZ7ro7bPZ03TfjZAD53OzQZc7hjloOzCBZr0Pnl4Bre2ebrlqP8zbN-eIIwkPDTHya6XIvR14qzPFyPbYdLpsQgQujaBvbCLMqFCJQhMilQBECRdwgN70wdHnHpWTNBeRMM9EPzR-0q-8o5fWlB-nZT7dOYQqB3BB3VnZZz9KrdKypfqRvx3Q6ukfu1mqn-xbA98lAZw_Irxa8tAEvzee0D16K4KVd8FIAL23AS1vwUgteugUvbcH7lgJ0aRe62FADXQrQpTV0aWkq1tB9SI4_To4-TJ16vxAnZshw7Uuw-DgLtPIU01EUK3cc61BJmNIkfjBXb2KeeGMvHrO577II7pJBqBIw0CIPRj7_EdnJ8kw_IRQEqcibK82QzzF2oxjGKsUCyfxQMiaH5FWjBXFuaWHElYofkndWT23VusewVV0uXCy6t7Q1MPcSujoQ0dOwqHuhQsRzjlIWAj8WYRhD8cfHQybQJPdDH-QGQ_LYYqF9Ch9jGBjnQxL1UNJWQOr5_pUsXRgKeswuxpnA0-u8h2fkNj6kdWA-JzvlutIvwKQv1a5xhUE5-zmB8uBwtms-kj-OLwYp |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment+Outcomes+of+Stent-Assisted+Coil+Embolization+for+Ruptured+Vertebral+Artery+Dissecting+Aneurysms%3A+The+Preservation+of+Branches+May+Improve+the+Prognosis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neuroendovascular+therapy&rft.au=Ayabe%2C+Junichi&rft.au=Watanabe%2C+Masahide&rft.au=Mishima%2C+Hiroyuki&rft.au=Tsuchiya%2C+Yusuke&rft.date=2021&rft.issn=1882-4072&rft.eissn=2186-2494&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=23&rft_id=info:doi/10.5797%2Fjnet.oa.2019-0124&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_5797_jnet_oa_2019_0124 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1882-4072&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1882-4072&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1882-4072&client=summon |