Design and in vitro evaluation of new rpoB-DGGE primers for ruminants

Two new primer sets based on the rpoB gene were designed and evaluated with bovine and ovine rumen samples. The newly developed rpoB-DGGE primer set was used along with the 16S rRNA gene-V3, and another (old) rpoB-DGGE-based primer set from a previous study to in vitro compare the bovine and ovine r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFEMS microbiology ecology Vol. 76; no. 1; pp. 156 - 169
Main Authors Perumbakkam, Sudeep, Craig, A. Morrie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2011
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two new primer sets based on the rpoB gene were designed and evaluated with bovine and ovine rumen samples. The newly developed rpoB-DGGE primer set was used along with the 16S rRNA gene-V3, and another (old) rpoB-DGGE-based primer set from a previous study to in vitro compare the bovine and ovine rumen ecosystems. The results indicate a significant (P<0.001) difference in the microbial population between the two ruminants irrespective of the primers used in the analysis. Qualitative comparison of the data provides evidence for the presence of similar phyla profiles between the 16S rRNA gene and the newly developed rpoB primers. A comparison between the two rpoB-based primer sets (old and new) showed that the old rpoB-based primers failed to amplify phylum Bacteroidetes (a common phylum in the rumen) in both bovine and ovine rumen samples. The old and new rpoB-DGGE-based primers amplified a large number of clones belonging to phylum Proteobacteria, providing a useful insight into the microbial structure of the rumen. ChaoI, ACE, Simpson, and Shannon-Weaver index analysis estimated the bovine rumen to be more diverse than the ovine rumen for all three primer sets. These results provide a new insight into the community structure among ruminants using the newly developed primers in this study.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01042.x
Editor: Julian Marchesi
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0168-6496
1574-6941
DOI:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01042.x