Intraindividual validation of 4D flow measurement against 2D flow measurements in complex flow patterns in routine clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance of bicuspid aortic valve

Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEgyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Vol. 51; no. 1; pp. 222 - 8
Main Authors Kharabish, Ahmed, Belker, Kristina, Martinoff, Stefan, Ewert, Peter, Hennemuth, Anja, Huellebrand, Markus, Stern, Heiko, Meierhofer, Christian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 06.11.2020
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
SpringerOpen
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0378-603X
2090-4762
DOI10.1186/s43055-020-00331-x

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error. Results The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were − 8 and − 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/− 28 ml and + 14/− 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/− 18 ml and + 12/− 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers. Conclusion Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4–9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies.
AbstractList Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error. Results The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were − 8 and − 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/− 28 ml and + 14/− 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/− 18 ml and + 12/− 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers. Conclusion Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4–9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies.
Abstract Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error. Results The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were − 8 and − 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/− 28 ml and + 14/− 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/− 18 ml and + 12/− 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers. Conclusion Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4–9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies.
BackgroundComparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error.ResultsThe two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were − 8 and − 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/− 28 ml and + 14/− 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/− 18 ml and + 12/− 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers.ConclusionInter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4–9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies.
Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error. Results The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were - 8 and - 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/- 28 ml and + 14/- 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/- 18 ml and + 12/- 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers. Conclusion Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4-9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies.
Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error. The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were - 8 and - 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/- 28 ml and + 14/- 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/- 18 ml and + 12/- 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4-9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies.
Audience Professional
Academic
Author Huellebrand, Markus
Martinoff, Stefan
Ewert, Peter
Kharabish, Ahmed
Meierhofer, Christian
Hennemuth, Anja
Stern, Heiko
Belker, Kristina
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ahmed
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7826-970X
  surname: Kharabish
  fullname: Kharabish, Ahmed
  email: Ahmed.kharabish@lhch.NHS.UK
  organization: Department of Radiology, Cairo University Hospitals, Department of Radiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kristina
  surname: Belker
  fullname: Belker, Kristina
  organization: Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Stefan
  surname: Martinoff
  fullname: Martinoff, Stefan
  organization: Department of Radiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universitat Munchen
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Peter
  surname: Ewert
  fullname: Ewert, Peter
  organization: Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Anja
  surname: Hennemuth
  fullname: Hennemuth, Anja
  organization: Fraunhofer MEVIS—Institute for Medical Image Computing
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Markus
  surname: Huellebrand
  fullname: Huellebrand, Markus
  organization: Fraunhofer MEVIS—Institute for Medical Image Computing
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Heiko
  surname: Stern
  fullname: Stern, Heiko
  organization: Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Christian
  surname: Meierhofer
  fullname: Meierhofer, Christian
  organization: Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München
BookMark eNptUsuK3DAQNGEDmWz2B3IS5OyNXpbl47J5DSzkkkBuoi21Bw225Ej2ZPJj-b7VzASWkJUOgq7q6pJUr6urEANW1VtGbxnT6n2WgjZNTTmtKRWC1ccX1YbTjtayVfyq2lDR6lpR8eNVdZPznpYlKWVKbqo_27Ak8MH5g3crjOQAo3ew-BhIHIj8QIYx_iITQl4TThgWArvCzwvh_2OZ-EBsnOYRjxdwhmXBFM5AiuviAxI7-uBtmWUhOR8PkO06QiIT7AIu3pKEOQYIFk8Wem_XPHtHIKYTWAwe8E31coAx483f87r6_unjt_sv9cPXz9v7u4fayk4tNYjeCYUopRga6HvRgLaCgrNKy84qFALBuvI-ggnLmUUpbMd02_OWlQ5xXW0vui7C3szJT5B-mwjenAsx7QycXI1oQDZFijvnhlaCRa0ZaIZScVScK1e03l205hR_rpgXs49rCsW-4ZrxVmilmyfWDoqoD0Ms_2Mnn625U5qyVndKFNbtM6yyHU7elngMvtT_aRCXhlwuEXaYnoYzak4xMpcYmRIjc46ROYpHg8DAqA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10554_024_03299_1
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_022_00895_2
Cites_doi 10.1002/mrm.22090
10.1093/ehjci/jes273
10.1007/s10554-016-1031-9
10.1007/s11886-005-0011-9
10.1080/10976640701465090
10.2174/1381612823666170317144257
10.1002/jmri.23793
10.1007/s00330-011-2108-4
10.1023/A:1014394626363
10.1002/jmri.22280
10.1002/jmri.23500
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.067
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2020
COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer
The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2020
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer
– notice: The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
3V.
7X7
7XB
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s43055-020-00331-x
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
DatabaseTitleList

Publicly Available Content Database


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X7
  name: Health & Medical Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2090-4762
EndPage 8
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d
A680178963
10_1186_s43055_020_00331_x
GeographicLocations Germany
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Germany
GroupedDBID C6C
---
--K
0R~
4.4
457
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AAEDT
AAFWJ
AAIKJ
AAKKN
ABEEZ
ABMAC
ABUWG
ACACY
ACGFS
ACULB
ADBBV
ADEZE
AFGXO
AFKRA
AFPKN
AGHFR
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
C24
CCPQU
DIK
E3Z
EBS
FDB
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
ITC
IXB
KQ8
O-L
O9-
OK1
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PMFND
SES
SOJ
UKHRP
XH2
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-a3bd36ee443f5abb35a8c30adc6849c6e33eacd037313c21ce43c9187b271f5a3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 0378-603X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:16:52 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 04:56:25 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:32:05 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:24:22 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:40:35 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords CMRI
CHD
4D flow
BAV
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c496t-a3bd36ee443f5abb35a8c30adc6849c6e33eacd037313c21ce43c9187b271f5a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0002-7826-970X
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d
PQID 2812738685
PQPubID 5758466
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d
proquest_journals_2812738685
gale_infotracmisc_A680178963
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A680178963
springer_journals_10_1186_s43055_020_00331_x
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-11-06
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-11-06
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-11-06
  day: 06
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Cairo
PublicationTitle Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
PublicationTitleAbbrev Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
SpringerOpen
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer
– name: Springer Nature B.V
– name: SpringerOpen
References CR4
Uribe, Beerbaum, Sørensen, Rasmusson, Razavi, Schaeffter (CR16) 2009; 62
Kilner, Gatehouse, Firmin (CR1) 2007; 9
CR5
Colletti (CR3) 2005; 7
Nordmeyer, Riesenkampff, Crelier, Khasheei, Schnackenburg, Berger, Kuehne (CR13) 2010; 32
Kamphuis, Westenberg, van der Palen, Blom, de Roos, van der Geest, Elbaz, Roest (CR15) 2017; 33
Lewandowski, Raman, Banerjee, Milanesi (CR18) 2017; 23
CR19
CR17
CR9
CR14
Geiger, Markl, Jung, Grohmann, Stiller, Langer, Arnold (CR6) 2011; 21
Sundareswaran, Haggerty, de Zélicourt, Dasi, Pekkan, Frakes, Powell, Kanter, Fogel, Yoganathan (CR8) 2012; 143
CR10
Nordmeyer, Riesenkampff, Messroghli, Kropf, Nordmeyer, Berger, Kuehne (CR12) 2013; 37
Meierhofer, Schneider, Lyko, Hutter, Martinoff, Markl, Hager, Hess, Stern, Fratz (CR11) 2013; 14
Petersen, Voigtländer, Kreitner, Kalden, Wittlinger, Scharhag, Horstick, Becker, Hommel, Thelen, Meyer (CR2) 2002; 18
Geiger, Markl, Herzer, Hirtler, Loeffelbein, Stiller, Langer, Arnold (CR7) 2012; 35
References_xml – ident: CR19
– volume: 62
  start-page: 984
  year: 2009
  end-page: 992
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Four-dimensional (4D) flow of the whole heart and great vessels using real-time respiratory self-gating
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.22090
– ident: CR4
– ident: CR14
– volume: 14
  start-page: 797
  year: 2013
  end-page: 804
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study
  publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes273
– ident: CR17
– ident: CR10
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1069
  issue: 7
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1081
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Unravelling cardiovascular disease using four dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-1031-9
– ident: CR9
– volume: 7
  start-page: 52
  year: 2005
  end-page: 58
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Evaluation of intracardiac shunts with cardiac magnetic resonance
  publication-title: Curr Cardiol Rep
  doi: 10.1007/s11886-005-0011-9
– volume: 9
  start-page: 723
  year: 2007
  end-page: 728
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
  doi: 10.1080/10976640701465090
– volume: 23
  start-page: 3262
  issue: 22
  year: 2017
  end-page: 3267
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Novel insights into complex cardiovascular pathologies using 4D flow analysis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: Curr Pharm Des
  doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170317144257
– volume: 37
  start-page: 208
  year: 2013
  end-page: 216
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Four-dimensional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flow
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.23793
– ident: CR5
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1651
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1657
  ident: CR6
  article-title: 4D-MR flow analysis in patients after repair for tetralogy of Fallot
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2108-4
– volume: 18
  start-page: 53
  year: 2002
  end-page: 60
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Quantification of shunt volumes in congenital heart diseases using a breath-hold MR phase contrast technique-comparison with oximetry
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1023/A:1014394626363
– volume: 32
  start-page: 677
  year: 2010
  end-page: 683
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Flow-sensitive four-dimensional cine magnetic resonance imaging for offline blood flow quantification in multiple vessels: a validation study
  publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.22280
– volume: 35
  start-page: 594
  year: 2012
  end-page: 600
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Aortic flow patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome assessed by flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.23500
– volume: 143
  start-page: 1108
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1116
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Visualization of flow structures in Fontan patients using 3-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.067
SSID ssj0000400164
Score 2.1527069
Snippet Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed...
Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed...
Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare...
BackgroundComparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to...
Abstract Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
springer
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 222
SubjectTerms 4D flow
BAV
CHD
CMRI
Coronary vessels
Flow velocity
Heart valve diseases
Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging
Measurement
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nuclear Medicine
Pulmonary arteries
Radiology
Regression analysis
Software
Statistical significance
Veins & arteries
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagSIgLKi-xtCAfkLgQdWM7tnNCLVAVpHKi0t4sx4_VSjTZbrbt_rL-PmYch9VqJa4ZJ3Hiz2PPjOcbQj4KzqL2loNtEmMhrOdFPQ1NEX1tWaybWnmM6F7-khdX4uesmmWHW5-PVY46MSlq3zn0kZ8wWImwQKWuvixvCqwahdHVXELjMXmSqMsAz2qm_vlYEKAjgxQYS3LKZ2PejJYnfWK7KtB-wopmZbHJvP372nkvTJpWn_ND8jxvG-npMM4vyKPQviRPL3Ng_BV5-NGmYg9jdhUFAC2Gckm0i1R8o_FPd0-vtx5BaufQvl9Tti_r6aKl6bB52AzCZaLhbJNg1QFY20DHpErqds600ms7bzE1koIl3yGfR8AuNAt32y8XntoOPwI7eBdek6vz77-_XhS5JEPhRC3XheWN5zIEIXisbNPwymrHp9Y7qUXtZOAcNLmH381L7ljpguCuLrVqmCrhDv6GHLRdG94SKpQPwbHIIwcrLVa1V4CmgAYQFyJWE3KGg2GWA-uGQR7sdKFbzU2eVsaKCl7HvPdRCeuC1qXVZRCSBQkbSz8hn3AoDc5WGAZnc9IBdAF5r8yphBVaadBCE3K80xJmmdsVj2AweZb3ZovJCfk8AmQrTvaVlmYAmgGgmQQ0s3n3_6cdkWcMYYnea3lMDtar2_Ae9j7r5kMC-F9WAAYT
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Pb9UwDI_QkBAXNP6Jtw2UAxIXKl7jNE2PYzANpHFi0m5RmjjTk1j7tL7BPhmfDzttNZ4eF661q7ryz4kdx7YQbzWoZKMHik1SKrSPUDRLbIsUG69S0zZ15Izu-TdzdqG_XlaXU5scroX5O39fWvNhyC2pCg5yeOxYWZC_-LAqweTErDmZ62D-yTr14d9dbXfSnnk3Od0XTyY3UB6PensqHmD3TDw6nxLdz8XvL10e3jBXS0kCxGocfyT7JPUnmX70v-T1_Qmf9FfEP2yk2qUNctXJfHkc70biOrfV7DLhpifwdSjnIkkZtu6oymt_1XGpo6TIvOf-HMgitKtwO6xXUfqef4IF_IkvxMXp5-8nZ8U0YqEIujGbwkMbwSBqDanybQuVtwGWPgZjdRMMAtDKHJdQQwlBlQE1hKa0davqkt6Al2Kv6zt8JaSuI2JQCRJQ1JWqJtaEDuSABrRO1UJ8ZGW49dhFw3Ff6_yA1O0mM3FeV_Q5FWNMtfYBrS29LVEbhYYcxbgQ71iVjq2P1BD8VERAInAfK3dsaMetLa0qC3G0xUlWE7bJMxjcZLWDU-Tt8BBUS8K-nwFyT87xkjVuBJojoLkMNHd38H_sh-KxYpjy6bQ5Enubm1t8Tb7Npn2TQf0HoO_56A
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Intraindividual validation of 4D flow measurement against 2D flow measurements in complex flow patterns in routine clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance of bicuspid aortic valve
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43055-020-00331-x
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2812738685
https://doaj.org/article/a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d
Volume 51
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagXLggECAWysoHJC5ETWzHj2O7tCpIVAhRaW-W40e1Ek1WzRb2l_X3dcZJVFZ74MIxGUeaZD5PZmzPN4R8EJwlHRyH3CSlQrjAC1PGpkjBOJZMY1TAHd1vF_L8Unxd1su_Wn3hmbCBHnj4cEdO1M4HFkJISjgfta6crqKQLEoIHQJ639KUQzI1VcVoedRnLqsCsyPsV1YV25GVf9_37m2C5n_L2XPybAwK6fGgzAvyKLYvyd2XNvdvmAqmKGBiNXRAol2i4jNNv7o_9PphkY-6Kxjfbyjbl_V01dJ8fjxuB-E6M2u2WXDTAf7aSKc6Sep3jqnSa3fVYrUjheS8Q4qOiCo0K3_br1eBug41RwV_x1fk8uz05-K8GLssFF4YuSkcbwKXMQrBU-2ahtdOe1664KUWxsvIOTjnUHLFK-5Z5aPg3lRaNUxV8AR_TQ7aro1vCBUqxOhZ4olD4pVqExQAJGJOw4VI9YycoAXseiDSsEhtnW-Awe1ocPsvg8_IR7SfxQkIZvBurCMAFZDKyh5L-OkqDY5lRg53RsLE8bviCQF2nLi9ZRDwYB9UDcp-mlDxIM4pk5Z2QJcFdNmMLrt9-z_e7R15yhCxuGwtD8nB5uY2voegZ9PMyWO1VHPy5OT04vsPuFrIxTxj_h7GjgqK
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELZKKgEXxFMNFPABxIVVs7bX6z0g1NJWCW0ihFopN-P1I4pEd0OS0vCnOPL7mNkHURSJW687Xq9X883YM-OZIeSN4CwoZzjYJiFEwjgeZT2fR8FlhoUsz1KHEd3hSPYvxedxMt4hv9tcGLxW2erESlG70qKP_IDBToQNKlXycfYjwq5RGF1tW2jUsDjzv27AZFt8GBwDf98ydnpy8akfNV0FIisyuYwMzx2X3gvBQ2LynCdGWd4zzkolMis956CMXI-nPOaWxdYLbrNYpTlLY3iDw7x3yK7AjNYO2T06GX35-s-rgyLR1qwC80z2-LjN1FHyYFHV14rQYsMeanG0ajoFbO8HW4HZar87fUgeNAdVelgj6xHZ8cVjcnfYhOKfkD-Domov0eZzUYDstG7QRMtAxTEN38sberX2QVIzgfGLJWXbtAWdFrS63u5XNXFWFf4sKsK8BPEoPG3TOKnduEVLr8ykwGRMOvdoWQCOcQn51F4vZlNHTYk_gQv86Z-Sy1th1zPSKcrC7xEqUue9ZYEHDnZhSDKXAn49mlxciJB0yREyQ8_qOh8aK29XD8r5RDeCrI1I4HPMORdSYaxXKjYq9kIyL-Eo67rkHbJSo34ANljTpDnAErDSlj6UcCZIFei9LtnfGAlybTfJLRh0o1cWei0FXfK-BciaXFl0SuoaaBqApiug6dXz_8_2mtzrXwzP9flgdPaC3GcIUfSdy33SWc6v_Us4eS3zVw3cKfl22xL2F2VgRSY
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELfGkCZeEJ-iMMAPIF6I2tiOnTwgNCjVytjEA5P6Zhx_VJW2pLQdK_8YD_x13DkJVVWJt73mHMfR_e58d_bdEfJKcBZyZzj4JiEkwjieFANfJsEVhoWiLJTDE93TM3l8Lj5Psske-dPlwuC1yk4nRkXtaosx8j6DnQgbVOZZP7TXIr4OR-_nPxLsIIUnrV07jQYiJ_7XNbhvy3fjIfD6NWOjT98-Hidth4HEikKuEsNLx6X3QvCQmbLkmcktHxhnZS4KKz3noJjcgCuecstS6wW3RZqrkqkU3uAw7y1yW3GwqkCW1ET9i--gcHTVq8BRkwM-6XJ2ctlfxkpbCfpu2E0tTdZtz4DdnWHniDbufKN75G5rstKjBmP3yZ6vHpCD0_ZQ_iH5Pa5io4kus4sCeGdNqyZaByqGNFzU1_RyE42kZgrjlyvKdmlLOqtovOju1w1xHkuAVpGwqEFQKk-7hE5qt-7T0kszrTAtky48-hiAaFxCObNXy_nMUVPjT-ACf_pH5PxGmPWY7Fd15Z8QKpTz3rLAAwcPMWSFU4Bkj84XFyJkPfIBmaHnTcUPjTW444N6MdWtSGsjMvgcc84FJYz1eZ6aPPVCMi_BqHU98gZZqVFTABusaRMeYAlYc0sfSbAOVA4asEcOt0aChNttcgcG3WqYpd7IQ4-87QCyIUffLpe6AZoGoOkINL1--v_ZXpIDkCv9ZXx28ozcYYhQDKLLQ7K_Wlz552CCrcoXEeuUfL9p4foLpeBH7Q
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraindividual+validation+of+4D+flow+measurement+against+2D+flow+measurements+in+complex+flow+patterns+in+routine+clinical+cardiovascular+magnetic+resonance+of+bicuspid+aortic+valve&rft.jtitle=The+Egyptian+Journal+of+Radiology+and+Nuclear+Medicine&rft.au=Ahmed+Kharabish&rft.au=Kristina+Belker&rft.au=Stefan+Martinoff&rft.au=Peter+Ewert&rft.date=2020-11-06&rft.pub=SpringerOpen&rft.eissn=2090-4762&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs43055-020-00331-x&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0378-603X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0378-603X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0378-603X&client=summon