Intraindividual validation of 4D flow measurement against 2D flow measurements in complex flow patterns in routine clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance of bicuspid aortic valve
Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four...
Saved in:
Published in | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Vol. 51; no. 1; pp. 222 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
06.11.2020
Springer Springer Nature B.V SpringerOpen |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0378-603X 2090-4762 |
DOI | 10.1186/s43055-020-00331-x |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error.
Results
The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were − 8 and − 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/− 28 ml and + 14/− 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/− 18 ml and + 12/− 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers.
Conclusion
Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4–9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background
Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error.
Results
The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were − 8 and − 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/− 28 ml and + 14/− 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/− 18 ml and + 12/− 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers.
Conclusion
Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4–9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies. Abstract Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error. Results The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were − 8 and − 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/− 28 ml and + 14/− 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/− 18 ml and + 12/− 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers. Conclusion Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4–9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies. BackgroundComparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error.ResultsThe two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were − 8 and − 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/− 28 ml and + 14/− 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/− 18 ml and + 12/− 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers.ConclusionInter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4–9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies. Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error. Results The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were - 8 and - 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/- 28 ml and + 14/- 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/- 18 ml and + 12/- 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers. Conclusion Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4-9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies. Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare four-dimensional against the two-dimensional flow measurement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and to test potentials of four-dimensional operator-dependent sources of error. The two- and four-dimensional flow data sets of sixteen patients with bicuspid aortic valve and eighteen healthy subjects were studied. Flow analyses were performed by two observers blindly. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were - 8 and - 4 ml, respectively. Four-dimensional measurements resulted in systematically higher flow values than the two-dimensional flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 12/- 28 ml and + 14/- 21 ml, respectively. In the healthy volunteers, mean differences between the two- and four-dimensional measurements in both observers were ± 0 and + 1 ml, respectively. The upper and lower limits of agreement between the two- and four-dimensional measurements by both observers were + 21/- 18 ml and + 12/- 13 ml, respectively. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow measurement was 4% mean net forward flow in bicuspid aortic valve patients and 8% in healthy volunteers. Inter-observer variability in four-dimensional flow assessment is 8% or less which is acceptable for clinical cardiac MRI routine. There is close agreement of two- and four-dimensional flow tools in normal and complex flow pattern. In complex flow pattern, however, four-dimensional flow measurement picks up 4-9% higher flow values. It seems, therefore, that four-dimensional flow is closer to real flow values than two-dimensional flow, which is however to be proven by further studies. |
Audience | Professional Academic |
Author | Huellebrand, Markus Martinoff, Stefan Ewert, Peter Kharabish, Ahmed Meierhofer, Christian Hennemuth, Anja Stern, Heiko Belker, Kristina |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ahmed orcidid: 0000-0002-7826-970X surname: Kharabish fullname: Kharabish, Ahmed email: Ahmed.kharabish@lhch.NHS.UK organization: Department of Radiology, Cairo University Hospitals, Department of Radiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital – sequence: 2 givenname: Kristina surname: Belker fullname: Belker, Kristina organization: Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München – sequence: 3 givenname: Stefan surname: Martinoff fullname: Martinoff, Stefan organization: Department of Radiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universitat Munchen – sequence: 4 givenname: Peter surname: Ewert fullname: Ewert, Peter organization: Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München – sequence: 5 givenname: Anja surname: Hennemuth fullname: Hennemuth, Anja organization: Fraunhofer MEVIS—Institute for Medical Image Computing – sequence: 6 givenname: Markus surname: Huellebrand fullname: Huellebrand, Markus organization: Fraunhofer MEVIS—Institute for Medical Image Computing – sequence: 7 givenname: Heiko surname: Stern fullname: Stern, Heiko organization: Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München – sequence: 8 givenname: Christian surname: Meierhofer fullname: Meierhofer, Christian organization: Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München |
BookMark | eNptUsuK3DAQNGEDmWz2B3IS5OyNXpbl47J5DSzkkkBuoi21Bw225Ej2ZPJj-b7VzASWkJUOgq7q6pJUr6urEANW1VtGbxnT6n2WgjZNTTmtKRWC1ccX1YbTjtayVfyq2lDR6lpR8eNVdZPznpYlKWVKbqo_27Ak8MH5g3crjOQAo3ew-BhIHIj8QIYx_iITQl4TThgWArvCzwvh_2OZ-EBsnOYRjxdwhmXBFM5AiuviAxI7-uBtmWUhOR8PkO06QiIT7AIu3pKEOQYIFk8Wem_XPHtHIKYTWAwe8E31coAx483f87r6_unjt_sv9cPXz9v7u4fayk4tNYjeCYUopRga6HvRgLaCgrNKy84qFALBuvI-ggnLmUUpbMd02_OWlQ5xXW0vui7C3szJT5B-mwjenAsx7QycXI1oQDZFijvnhlaCRa0ZaIZScVScK1e03l205hR_rpgXs49rCsW-4ZrxVmilmyfWDoqoD0Ms_2Mnn625U5qyVndKFNbtM6yyHU7elngMvtT_aRCXhlwuEXaYnoYzak4xMpcYmRIjc46ROYpHg8DAqA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10554_024_03299_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_022_00895_2 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/mrm.22090 10.1093/ehjci/jes273 10.1007/s10554-016-1031-9 10.1007/s11886-005-0011-9 10.1080/10976640701465090 10.2174/1381612823666170317144257 10.1002/jmri.23793 10.1007/s00330-011-2108-4 10.1023/A:1014394626363 10.1002/jmri.22280 10.1002/jmri.23500 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.067 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2020 COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2020 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer – notice: The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | C6C 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s43055-020-00331-x |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X7 name: Health & Medical Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2090-4762 |
EndPage | 8 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d A680178963 10_1186_s43055_020_00331_x |
GeographicLocations | Germany |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany |
GroupedDBID | C6C --- --K 0R~ 4.4 457 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAEDT AAFWJ AAIKJ AAKKN ABEEZ ABMAC ABUWG ACACY ACGFS ACULB ADBBV ADEZE AFGXO AFKRA AFPKN AGHFR AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR C24 CCPQU DIK E3Z EBS FDB FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK IAO IHR INH ITC IXB KQ8 O-L O9- OK1 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PMFND SES SOJ UKHRP XH2 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-a3bd36ee443f5abb35a8c30adc6849c6e33eacd037313c21ce43c9187b271f5a3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 0378-603X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:16:52 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 04:56:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:32:05 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:24:22 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:40:35 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | CMRI CHD 4D flow BAV |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c496t-a3bd36ee443f5abb35a8c30adc6849c6e33eacd037313c21ce43c9187b271f5a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-7826-970X |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d |
PQID | 2812738685 |
PQPubID | 5758466 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d proquest_journals_2812738685 gale_infotracmisc_A680178963 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A680178963 springer_journals_10_1186_s43055_020_00331_x |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-11-06 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-11-06 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2020 text: 2020-11-06 day: 06 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Berlin/Heidelberg |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Cairo |
PublicationTitle | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Springer Nature B.V SpringerOpen |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg – name: Springer – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: SpringerOpen |
References | CR4 Uribe, Beerbaum, Sørensen, Rasmusson, Razavi, Schaeffter (CR16) 2009; 62 Kilner, Gatehouse, Firmin (CR1) 2007; 9 CR5 Colletti (CR3) 2005; 7 Nordmeyer, Riesenkampff, Crelier, Khasheei, Schnackenburg, Berger, Kuehne (CR13) 2010; 32 Kamphuis, Westenberg, van der Palen, Blom, de Roos, van der Geest, Elbaz, Roest (CR15) 2017; 33 Lewandowski, Raman, Banerjee, Milanesi (CR18) 2017; 23 CR19 CR17 CR9 CR14 Geiger, Markl, Jung, Grohmann, Stiller, Langer, Arnold (CR6) 2011; 21 Sundareswaran, Haggerty, de Zélicourt, Dasi, Pekkan, Frakes, Powell, Kanter, Fogel, Yoganathan (CR8) 2012; 143 CR10 Nordmeyer, Riesenkampff, Messroghli, Kropf, Nordmeyer, Berger, Kuehne (CR12) 2013; 37 Meierhofer, Schneider, Lyko, Hutter, Martinoff, Markl, Hager, Hess, Stern, Fratz (CR11) 2013; 14 Petersen, Voigtländer, Kreitner, Kalden, Wittlinger, Scharhag, Horstick, Becker, Hommel, Thelen, Meyer (CR2) 2002; 18 Geiger, Markl, Herzer, Hirtler, Loeffelbein, Stiller, Langer, Arnold (CR7) 2012; 35 |
References_xml | – ident: CR19 – volume: 62 start-page: 984 year: 2009 end-page: 992 ident: CR16 article-title: Four-dimensional (4D) flow of the whole heart and great vessels using real-time respiratory self-gating publication-title: Magn Reson Med doi: 10.1002/mrm.22090 – ident: CR4 – ident: CR14 – volume: 14 start-page: 797 year: 2013 end-page: 804 ident: CR11 article-title: Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes273 – ident: CR17 – ident: CR10 – volume: 33 start-page: 1069 issue: 7 year: 2017 end-page: 1081 ident: CR15 article-title: Unravelling cardiovascular disease using four dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-1031-9 – ident: CR9 – volume: 7 start-page: 52 year: 2005 end-page: 58 ident: CR3 article-title: Evaluation of intracardiac shunts with cardiac magnetic resonance publication-title: Curr Cardiol Rep doi: 10.1007/s11886-005-0011-9 – volume: 9 start-page: 723 year: 2007 end-page: 728 ident: CR1 article-title: Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising publication-title: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson doi: 10.1080/10976640701465090 – volume: 23 start-page: 3262 issue: 22 year: 2017 end-page: 3267 ident: CR18 article-title: Novel insights into complex cardiovascular pathologies using 4D flow analysis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: Curr Pharm Des doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170317144257 – volume: 37 start-page: 208 year: 2013 end-page: 216 ident: CR12 article-title: Four-dimensional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flow publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.23793 – ident: CR5 – volume: 21 start-page: 1651 year: 2011 end-page: 1657 ident: CR6 article-title: 4D-MR flow analysis in patients after repair for tetralogy of Fallot publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2108-4 – volume: 18 start-page: 53 year: 2002 end-page: 60 ident: CR2 article-title: Quantification of shunt volumes in congenital heart diseases using a breath-hold MR phase contrast technique-comparison with oximetry publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging doi: 10.1023/A:1014394626363 – volume: 32 start-page: 677 year: 2010 end-page: 683 ident: CR13 article-title: Flow-sensitive four-dimensional cine magnetic resonance imaging for offline blood flow quantification in multiple vessels: a validation study publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.22280 – volume: 35 start-page: 594 year: 2012 end-page: 600 ident: CR7 article-title: Aortic flow patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome assessed by flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.23500 – volume: 143 start-page: 1108 year: 2012 end-page: 1116 ident: CR8 article-title: Visualization of flow structures in Fontan patients using 3-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.067 |
SSID | ssj0000400164 |
Score | 2.1527069 |
Snippet | Background
Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed... Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed... Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to compare... BackgroundComparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This study aimed to... Abstract Background Comparing four-dimensional flow against two-dimensional flow measurements in patients with complex flow pattern is still lacking. This... |
SourceID | doaj proquest gale springer |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 222 |
SubjectTerms | 4D flow BAV CHD CMRI Coronary vessels Flow velocity Heart valve diseases Imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Measurement Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nuclear Medicine Pulmonary arteries Radiology Regression analysis Software Statistical significance Veins & arteries |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagSIgLKi-xtCAfkLgQdWM7tnNCLVAVpHKi0t4sx4_VSjTZbrbt_rL-PmYch9VqJa4ZJ3Hiz2PPjOcbQj4KzqL2loNtEmMhrOdFPQ1NEX1tWaybWnmM6F7-khdX4uesmmWHW5-PVY46MSlq3zn0kZ8wWImwQKWuvixvCqwahdHVXELjMXmSqMsAz2qm_vlYEKAjgxQYS3LKZ2PejJYnfWK7KtB-wopmZbHJvP372nkvTJpWn_ND8jxvG-npMM4vyKPQviRPL3Ng_BV5-NGmYg9jdhUFAC2Gckm0i1R8o_FPd0-vtx5BaufQvl9Tti_r6aKl6bB52AzCZaLhbJNg1QFY20DHpErqds600ms7bzE1koIl3yGfR8AuNAt32y8XntoOPwI7eBdek6vz77-_XhS5JEPhRC3XheWN5zIEIXisbNPwymrHp9Y7qUXtZOAcNLmH381L7ljpguCuLrVqmCrhDv6GHLRdG94SKpQPwbHIIwcrLVa1V4CmgAYQFyJWE3KGg2GWA-uGQR7sdKFbzU2eVsaKCl7HvPdRCeuC1qXVZRCSBQkbSz8hn3AoDc5WGAZnc9IBdAF5r8yphBVaadBCE3K80xJmmdsVj2AweZb3ZovJCfk8AmQrTvaVlmYAmgGgmQQ0s3n3_6cdkWcMYYnea3lMDtar2_Ae9j7r5kMC-F9WAAYT priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Pb9UwDI_QkBAXNP6Jtw2UAxIXKl7jNE2PYzANpHFi0m5RmjjTk1j7tL7BPhmfDzttNZ4eF661q7ryz4kdx7YQbzWoZKMHik1SKrSPUDRLbIsUG69S0zZ15Izu-TdzdqG_XlaXU5scroX5O39fWvNhyC2pCg5yeOxYWZC_-LAqweTErDmZ62D-yTr14d9dbXfSnnk3Od0XTyY3UB6PensqHmD3TDw6nxLdz8XvL10e3jBXS0kCxGocfyT7JPUnmX70v-T1_Qmf9FfEP2yk2qUNctXJfHkc70biOrfV7DLhpifwdSjnIkkZtu6oymt_1XGpo6TIvOf-HMgitKtwO6xXUfqef4IF_IkvxMXp5-8nZ8U0YqEIujGbwkMbwSBqDanybQuVtwGWPgZjdRMMAtDKHJdQQwlBlQE1hKa0davqkt6Al2Kv6zt8JaSuI2JQCRJQ1JWqJtaEDuSABrRO1UJ8ZGW49dhFw3Ff6_yA1O0mM3FeV_Q5FWNMtfYBrS29LVEbhYYcxbgQ71iVjq2P1BD8VERAInAfK3dsaMetLa0qC3G0xUlWE7bJMxjcZLWDU-Tt8BBUS8K-nwFyT87xkjVuBJojoLkMNHd38H_sh-KxYpjy6bQ5Enubm1t8Tb7Npn2TQf0HoO_56A priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Intraindividual validation of 4D flow measurement against 2D flow measurements in complex flow patterns in routine clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance of bicuspid aortic valve |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43055-020-00331-x https://www.proquest.com/docview/2812738685 https://doaj.org/article/a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d |
Volume | 51 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagXLggECAWysoHJC5ETWzHj2O7tCpIVAhRaW-W40e1Ek1WzRb2l_X3dcZJVFZ74MIxGUeaZD5PZmzPN4R8EJwlHRyH3CSlQrjAC1PGpkjBOJZMY1TAHd1vF_L8Unxd1su_Wn3hmbCBHnj4cEdO1M4HFkJISjgfta6crqKQLEoIHQJ639KUQzI1VcVoedRnLqsCsyPsV1YV25GVf9_37m2C5n_L2XPybAwK6fGgzAvyKLYvyd2XNvdvmAqmKGBiNXRAol2i4jNNv7o_9PphkY-6Kxjfbyjbl_V01dJ8fjxuB-E6M2u2WXDTAf7aSKc6Sep3jqnSa3fVYrUjheS8Q4qOiCo0K3_br1eBug41RwV_x1fk8uz05-K8GLssFF4YuSkcbwKXMQrBU-2ahtdOe1664KUWxsvIOTjnUHLFK-5Z5aPg3lRaNUxV8AR_TQ7aro1vCBUqxOhZ4olD4pVqExQAJGJOw4VI9YycoAXseiDSsEhtnW-Awe1ocPsvg8_IR7SfxQkIZvBurCMAFZDKyh5L-OkqDY5lRg53RsLE8bviCQF2nLi9ZRDwYB9UDcp-mlDxIM4pk5Z2QJcFdNmMLrt9-z_e7R15yhCxuGwtD8nB5uY2voegZ9PMyWO1VHPy5OT04vsPuFrIxTxj_h7GjgqK |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELZKKgEXxFMNFPABxIVVs7bX6z0g1NJWCW0ihFopN-P1I4pEd0OS0vCnOPL7mNkHURSJW687Xq9X883YM-OZIeSN4CwoZzjYJiFEwjgeZT2fR8FlhoUsz1KHEd3hSPYvxedxMt4hv9tcGLxW2erESlG70qKP_IDBToQNKlXycfYjwq5RGF1tW2jUsDjzv27AZFt8GBwDf98ydnpy8akfNV0FIisyuYwMzx2X3gvBQ2LynCdGWd4zzkolMis956CMXI-nPOaWxdYLbrNYpTlLY3iDw7x3yK7AjNYO2T06GX35-s-rgyLR1qwC80z2-LjN1FHyYFHV14rQYsMeanG0ajoFbO8HW4HZar87fUgeNAdVelgj6xHZ8cVjcnfYhOKfkD-Domov0eZzUYDstG7QRMtAxTEN38sberX2QVIzgfGLJWXbtAWdFrS63u5XNXFWFf4sKsK8BPEoPG3TOKnduEVLr8ykwGRMOvdoWQCOcQn51F4vZlNHTYk_gQv86Z-Sy1th1zPSKcrC7xEqUue9ZYEHDnZhSDKXAn49mlxciJB0yREyQ8_qOh8aK29XD8r5RDeCrI1I4HPMORdSYaxXKjYq9kIyL-Eo67rkHbJSo34ANljTpDnAErDSlj6UcCZIFei9LtnfGAlybTfJLRh0o1cWei0FXfK-BciaXFl0SuoaaBqApiug6dXz_8_2mtzrXwzP9flgdPaC3GcIUfSdy33SWc6v_Us4eS3zVw3cKfl22xL2F2VgRSY |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELfGkCZeEJ-iMMAPIF6I2tiOnTwgNCjVytjEA5P6Zhx_VJW2pLQdK_8YD_x13DkJVVWJt73mHMfR_e58d_bdEfJKcBZyZzj4JiEkwjieFANfJsEVhoWiLJTDE93TM3l8Lj5Psske-dPlwuC1yk4nRkXtaosx8j6DnQgbVOZZP7TXIr4OR-_nPxLsIIUnrV07jQYiJ_7XNbhvy3fjIfD6NWOjT98-Hidth4HEikKuEsNLx6X3QvCQmbLkmcktHxhnZS4KKz3noJjcgCuecstS6wW3RZqrkqkU3uAw7y1yW3GwqkCW1ET9i--gcHTVq8BRkwM-6XJ2ctlfxkpbCfpu2E0tTdZtz4DdnWHniDbufKN75G5rstKjBmP3yZ6vHpCD0_ZQ_iH5Pa5io4kus4sCeGdNqyZaByqGNFzU1_RyE42kZgrjlyvKdmlLOqtovOju1w1xHkuAVpGwqEFQKk-7hE5qt-7T0kszrTAtky48-hiAaFxCObNXy_nMUVPjT-ACf_pH5PxGmPWY7Fd15Z8QKpTz3rLAAwcPMWSFU4Bkj84XFyJkPfIBmaHnTcUPjTW444N6MdWtSGsjMvgcc84FJYz1eZ6aPPVCMi_BqHU98gZZqVFTABusaRMeYAlYc0sfSbAOVA4asEcOt0aChNttcgcG3WqYpd7IQ4-87QCyIUffLpe6AZoGoOkINL1--v_ZXpIDkCv9ZXx28ozcYYhQDKLLQ7K_Wlz552CCrcoXEeuUfL9p4foLpeBH7Q |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraindividual+validation+of+4D+flow+measurement+against+2D+flow+measurements+in+complex+flow+patterns+in+routine+clinical+cardiovascular+magnetic+resonance+of+bicuspid+aortic+valve&rft.jtitle=The+Egyptian+Journal+of+Radiology+and+Nuclear+Medicine&rft.au=Ahmed+Kharabish&rft.au=Kristina+Belker&rft.au=Stefan+Martinoff&rft.au=Peter+Ewert&rft.date=2020-11-06&rft.pub=SpringerOpen&rft.eissn=2090-4762&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs43055-020-00331-x&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_a45acd2dddf74ace881a81e462e6226d |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0378-603X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0378-603X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0378-603X&client=summon |