Reprogramming of the gut microbiota following feralization in Sus scrofa
Wild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under natural selection) originated. Strong adaptation deeply affects feral population's morphology and physiology, including the microbiota community. The gut microbi...
Saved in:
Published in | Animal microbiome Vol. 5; no. 1; p. 14 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central
24.02.2023
BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Wild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under natural selection) originated. Strong adaptation deeply affects feral population's morphology and physiology, including the microbiota community. The gut microbiota is generally recognized to play a crucial role in maintaining host health and metabolism. To date, it is unclear whether feral populations' phylogeny, development stages or lifestyle have the greatest impact in shaping the gut microbiota, as well as how this can confer adaptability to new environments. Here, in order to deepen this point, we characterized the gut microbiota of feral population discriminating between juvenile and adult samples, and we compared it to the microbiota structure of wild boar and domestic pig as the references. Gut microbiota composition was estimated through the sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene by DNA metabarcoding and High Throughput Sequencing on DNA extracted from fecal samples.
The comparison of microbiota communities among the three forms showed significant differences. The feral form seems to carry some bacteria of both domestic pigs, derived from its ancestral condition, and wild boars, probably as a sign of a recent re-adaptation strategy to the natural environment. In addition, interestingly, feral pigs show some exclusive bacterial taxa, also suggesting an innovative nature of the evolutionary trajectories and an ecological segregation in feral populations, as already observed for other traits.
The feral pig showed a significant change between juvenile and adult microbiota suggesting an influence of the wild environment in which these populations segregate. However, it is important to underline that we certainly cannot overlook that these variations in the structure of the microbiota also depended on the different development stages of the animal, which in fact influence the composition of the intestinal microbiota. Concluding, the feral pigs represent a new actor living in the same geographical space as the wild boars, in which its gut microbial structure suggests that it is mainly the result of environmental segregation, most different from its closest relative. This gives rise to interesting fields of exploration regarding the changed ecological complexity and the consequent evolutionary destiny of the animal communities involved in this phenomenon. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Wild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under natural selection) originated. Strong adaptation deeply affects feral population's morphology and physiology, including the microbiota community. The gut microbiota is generally recognized to play a crucial role in maintaining host health and metabolism. To date, it is unclear whether feral populations' phylogeny, development stages or lifestyle have the greatest impact in shaping the gut microbiota, as well as how this can confer adaptability to new environments. Here, in order to deepen this point, we characterized the gut microbiota of feral population discriminating between juvenile and adult samples, and we compared it to the microbiota structure of wild boar and domestic pig as the references. Gut microbiota composition was estimated through the sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene by DNA metabarcoding and High Throughput Sequencing on DNA extracted from fecal samples.
The comparison of microbiota communities among the three forms showed significant differences. The feral form seems to carry some bacteria of both domestic pigs, derived from its ancestral condition, and wild boars, probably as a sign of a recent re-adaptation strategy to the natural environment. In addition, interestingly, feral pigs show some exclusive bacterial taxa, also suggesting an innovative nature of the evolutionary trajectories and an ecological segregation in feral populations, as already observed for other traits.
The feral pig showed a significant change between juvenile and adult microbiota suggesting an influence of the wild environment in which these populations segregate. However, it is important to underline that we certainly cannot overlook that these variations in the structure of the microbiota also depended on the different development stages of the animal, which in fact influence the composition of the intestinal microbiota. Concluding, the feral pigs represent a new actor living in the same geographical space as the wild boars, in which its gut microbial structure suggests that it is mainly the result of environmental segregation, most different from its closest relative. This gives rise to interesting fields of exploration regarding the changed ecological complexity and the consequent evolutionary destiny of the animal communities involved in this phenomenon. Abstract Background Wild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under natural selection) originated. Strong adaptation deeply affects feral population’s morphology and physiology, including the microbiota community. The gut microbiota is generally recognized to play a crucial role in maintaining host health and metabolism. To date, it is unclear whether feral populations’ phylogeny, development stages or lifestyle have the greatest impact in shaping the gut microbiota, as well as how this can confer adaptability to new environments. Here, in order to deepen this point, we characterized the gut microbiota of feral population discriminating between juvenile and adult samples, and we compared it to the microbiota structure of wild boar and domestic pig as the references. Gut microbiota composition was estimated through the sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene by DNA metabarcoding and High Throughput Sequencing on DNA extracted from fecal samples. Results The comparison of microbiota communities among the three forms showed significant differences. The feral form seems to carry some bacteria of both domestic pigs, derived from its ancestral condition, and wild boars, probably as a sign of a recent re-adaptation strategy to the natural environment. In addition, interestingly, feral pigs show some exclusive bacterial taxa, also suggesting an innovative nature of the evolutionary trajectories and an ecological segregation in feral populations, as already observed for other traits. Conclusions The feral pig showed a significant change between juvenile and adult microbiota suggesting an influence of the wild environment in which these populations segregate. However, it is important to underline that we certainly cannot overlook that these variations in the structure of the microbiota also depended on the different development stages of the animal, which in fact influence the composition of the intestinal microbiota. Concluding, the feral pigs represent a new actor living in the same geographical space as the wild boars, in which its gut microbial structure suggests that it is mainly the result of environmental segregation, most different from its closest relative. This gives rise to interesting fields of exploration regarding the changed ecological complexity and the consequent evolutionary destiny of the animal communities involved in this phenomenon. BACKGROUNDWild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under natural selection) originated. Strong adaptation deeply affects feral population's morphology and physiology, including the microbiota community. The gut microbiota is generally recognized to play a crucial role in maintaining host health and metabolism. To date, it is unclear whether feral populations' phylogeny, development stages or lifestyle have the greatest impact in shaping the gut microbiota, as well as how this can confer adaptability to new environments. Here, in order to deepen this point, we characterized the gut microbiota of feral population discriminating between juvenile and adult samples, and we compared it to the microbiota structure of wild boar and domestic pig as the references. Gut microbiota composition was estimated through the sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene by DNA metabarcoding and High Throughput Sequencing on DNA extracted from fecal samples. RESULTSThe comparison of microbiota communities among the three forms showed significant differences. The feral form seems to carry some bacteria of both domestic pigs, derived from its ancestral condition, and wild boars, probably as a sign of a recent re-adaptation strategy to the natural environment. In addition, interestingly, feral pigs show some exclusive bacterial taxa, also suggesting an innovative nature of the evolutionary trajectories and an ecological segregation in feral populations, as already observed for other traits. CONCLUSIONSThe feral pig showed a significant change between juvenile and adult microbiota suggesting an influence of the wild environment in which these populations segregate. However, it is important to underline that we certainly cannot overlook that these variations in the structure of the microbiota also depended on the different development stages of the animal, which in fact influence the composition of the intestinal microbiota. Concluding, the feral pigs represent a new actor living in the same geographical space as the wild boars, in which its gut microbial structure suggests that it is mainly the result of environmental segregation, most different from its closest relative. This gives rise to interesting fields of exploration regarding the changed ecological complexity and the consequent evolutionary destiny of the animal communities involved in this phenomenon. Abstract Background Wild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under natural selection) originated. Strong adaptation deeply affects feral population’s morphology and physiology, including the microbiota community. The gut microbiota is generally recognized to play a crucial role in maintaining host health and metabolism. To date, it is unclear whether feral populations’ phylogeny, development stages or lifestyle have the greatest impact in shaping the gut microbiota, as well as how this can confer adaptability to new environments. Here, in order to deepen this point, we characterized the gut microbiota of feral population discriminating between juvenile and adult samples, and we compared it to the microbiota structure of wild boar and domestic pig as the references. Gut microbiota composition was estimated through the sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene by DNA metabarcoding and High Throughput Sequencing on DNA extracted from fecal samples. Results The comparison of microbiota communities among the three forms showed significant differences. The feral form seems to carry some bacteria of both domestic pigs, derived from its ancestral condition, and wild boars, probably as a sign of a recent re-adaptation strategy to the natural environment. In addition, interestingly, feral pigs show some exclusive bacterial taxa, also suggesting an innovative nature of the evolutionary trajectories and an ecological segregation in feral populations, as already observed for other traits. Conclusions The feral pig showed a significant change between juvenile and adult microbiota suggesting an influence of the wild environment in which these populations segregate. However, it is important to underline that we certainly cannot overlook that these variations in the structure of the microbiota also depended on the different development stages of the animal, which in fact influence the composition of the intestinal microbiota. Concluding, the feral pigs represent a new actor living in the same geographical space as the wild boars, in which its gut microbial structure suggests that it is mainly the result of environmental segregation, most different from its closest relative. This gives rise to interesting fields of exploration regarding the changed ecological complexity and the consequent evolutionary destiny of the animal communities involved in this phenomenon. |
ArticleNumber | 14 |
Author | Petrelli, Simona Scala, Giovanni Fulgione, Domenico Ricca, Ezio Baccigalupi, Loredana Buglione, Maria Rivieccio, Eleonora |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Simona surname: Petrelli fullname: Petrelli, Simona organization: Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, NA, Italy – sequence: 2 givenname: Maria surname: Buglione fullname: Buglione, Maria organization: Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, NA, Italy – sequence: 3 givenname: Eleonora surname: Rivieccio fullname: Rivieccio, Eleonora organization: Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Via Porta Di Massa 1, 80133, Naples, Italy – sequence: 4 givenname: Ezio surname: Ricca fullname: Ricca, Ezio organization: Task Force On Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, 80100, Naples, NA, Italy – sequence: 5 givenname: Loredana surname: Baccigalupi fullname: Baccigalupi, Loredana organization: Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, NA, Italy – sequence: 6 givenname: Giovanni surname: Scala fullname: Scala, Giovanni organization: Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, NA, Italy – sequence: 7 givenname: Domenico surname: Fulgione fullname: Fulgione, Domenico email: fulgione@unina.it, fulgione@unina.it organization: Task Force On Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, 80100, Naples, NA, Italy. fulgione@unina.it |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdUctu1TAQtVARLaU_wAJFYsMm4Pdjg4QqoJUqIfFYW77OJPVVYl_sBApfj0NK1bIYezRz5ujMnKfoKKYICD0n-DUhWr4pnArKWrxGfUR78wid1BJvuVTk6F5-jM5K2eMVRZik5gk6ZlJTJoU6QRef4ZDTkN00hTg0qW_ma2iGZW6m4HPahTS7pk_jmH6u_R6yG8NvN4cUmxCbL0tpSsX17hl63LuxwNntf4q-fXj_9fyivfr08fL83VXruZFzq513QiiFwXDJQWvSMdgpzozEBGtKQGizExqM8YRTzKnnWlEBjjCBjWan6HLj7ZLb20MOk8u_bHLB_i2kPFiX5-BHsEoJZTphvHaUK-1dp7jWtJfMaO9pV7neblyHZTdB5yHOdb0HpA87MVzbIf2wxgjCFa4Er24Jcvq-QJntFIqHcXQR0lIsVRpjyTfdL_-D7tOSYz2VpbrKIpjSFUU3VL1pKRn6OzEE29V3u_lu8Rqr7_amDr24v8bdyD-X2R-Cwajn |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micres_2023_127444 crossref_primary_10_1134_S1068162024020237 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13213341 crossref_primary_10_31857_S0132342324020051 |
Cites_doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0050312 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 10.1017/CBO9781139019514.013 10.1007/s11692-013-9262-3 10.3390/land11060887 10.1073/pnas.1901169116 10.1007/s00338-017-1572-y 10.1038/ncomms12950 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0 10.1186/s12711-016-0204-2 10.1371/journal.pone.0068739 10.3390/ijms20071630 10.1038/nrg3982 10.1186/s40168-017-0370-7 10.2307/1942268 10.1093/femsec/fiz121 10.1038/nature06245 10.3390/microorganisms8060868 10.1080/11250003.2014.953220 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135813 10.1016/B978-0-12-818030-3.00003-9 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000341 10.1038/hdy.2016.74 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003453 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z 10.1186/s12862-014-0269-x 10.1016/j.zool.2017.05.003 10.3390/microorganisms8121886 10.1177/0959683615596842 10.1016/j.tree.2016.06.008 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062453 10.1111/mec.14278 10.1038/ismej.2015.39 10.1038/s41467-020-14515-6 10.1038/nature23292 10.1007/978-3-642-30197-1_302 10.1111/eva.12383 10.1038/hdy.2015.8 10.2307/j.ctvh1dwvg.19 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 10.1111/asj.12492 10.1038/s41598-022-16955-0 10.1111/mam.12015 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00161 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.011 10.1093/nar/gks1219 10.1159/000082979 10.1038/nbt.2676 10.1371/journal.pone.0201901 10.1038/nmeth.3869 10.1111/mec.16238 10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4 10.1186/s12859-015-0611-3 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000533 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2023. The Author(s). 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. The Author(s) 2023 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023. The Author(s). – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. – notice: The Author(s) 2023 |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 8FE 8FH ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ LK8 M7P PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s42523-023-00235-x |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Biological Sciences Biological Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Veterinary Medicine |
EISSN | 2524-4671 |
EndPage | 14 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_77579d59c8a2478cad74882f6398cc2d 10_1186_s42523_023_00235_x 36823657 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ AAFWJ AAHBH AAJSJ ACRMQ ADBBV ADUKV AFKRA AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP BBNVY BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC C24 C6C CCPQU EBLON EBS EYRJQ GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ M7P M~E NPM OK1 PGMZT PIMPY ROL RPM RSV SOJ AAYXX CITATION 8FE 8FH ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ LK8 PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 AFGXO 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-8aca55770e9464e881d3eb74396010821e589b58e99c142042c48725ea1350983 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2524-4671 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:14:22 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:32:16 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 07:54:02 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 17 04:10:33 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 12 17:34:21 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:14:12 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Gut microbiota Reprogramming Sus scrofa Feralization |
Language | English |
License | 2023. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c496t-8aca55770e9464e881d3eb74396010821e589b58e99c142042c48725ea1350983 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951470/ |
PMID | 36823657 |
PQID | 2848810228 |
PQPubID | 5068540 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_77579d59c8a2478cad74882f6398cc2d pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9951470 proquest_miscellaneous_2780064098 proquest_journals_2848810228 crossref_primary_10_1186_s42523_023_00235_x pubmed_primary_36823657 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-02-24 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-02-24 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2023 text: 2023-02-24 day: 24 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Animal microbiome |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Anim Microbiome |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | 235_CR19 L Dethlefsen (235_CR29) 2007; 449 T Kubasova (235_CR58) 2018; 13 MAM Groenen (235_CR2) 2016; 48 C Quast (235_CR42) 2012; 41 C Milani (235_CR38) 2013; 8 D Fulgione (235_CR14) 2022; 11 G Dubois (235_CR31) 2017; 5 V Maselli (235_CR12) 2014; 41 M Buglione (235_CR37) 2022; 12 K Ushida (235_CR25) 2016; 87 N-R Shin (235_CR55) 2015; 33 G Alessandri (235_CR22) 2019; 95 AM Arfken (235_CR60) 2020; 8 D Fulgione (235_CR24) 2017; 123 A Alberdi (235_CR34) 2016; 31 SP Glaeser (235_CR57) 2014 GE Gardiner (235_CR26) 2020; 8 S Zhang (235_CR16) 2020; 11 JR Bray (235_CR43) 1957; 27 H Hemmer (235_CR7) 1990 JG Caporaso (235_CR39) 2010; 7 KR Foster (235_CR35) 2017; 548 TD Ainsworth (235_CR47) 2015; 9 DCT Kruska (235_CR8) 2005; 65 235_CR15 H Heberle (235_CR46) 2015; 16 M Fang (235_CR9) 2009; 5 Ø Hammer (235_CR44) 2001; 4 MA Zeder (235_CR10) 2012 A Evin (235_CR18) 2015; 15 C Lega (235_CR4) 2016; 26 G Uhr (235_CR21) 1995; 3 LGE Wilkins (235_CR53) 2019; 17 MJ Sweet (235_CR48) 2017; 36 G Larson (235_CR1) 2014; 45 S Wilkinson (235_CR11) 2013; 9 NA Moran (235_CR36) 2019; 50 M Johnsson (235_CR20) 2016; 7 S Menneson (235_CR27) 2019; 13 LAF Frantz (235_CR3) 2019; 116 235_CR45 C Lega (235_CR5) 2017; 118 G Berg (235_CR54) 2020; 8 235_CR49 D Fulgione (235_CR13) 2016; 9 SA Ballari (235_CR23) 2014; 44 MGI Langille (235_CR51) 2013; 31 235_CR6 CJ Murren (235_CR52) 2015; 115 N Segata (235_CR50) 2011; 12 V Maselli (235_CR17) 2014; 81 BJ Callahan (235_CR40) 2016; 13 T Chen (235_CR28) 2017; 7 NA Bokulich (235_CR41) 2018; 6 W Fang (235_CR56) 2012; 7 XX Wasimuddin (235_CR30) 2017; 26 235_CR32 SF Gilbert (235_CR33) 2015; 16 B Adhikari (235_CR59) 2019; 20 |
References_xml | – volume: 7 year: 2012 ident: 235_CR56 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050312 contributor: fullname: W Fang – volume: 7 start-page: 335 year: 2010 ident: 235_CR39 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 contributor: fullname: JG Caporaso – start-page: 227 volume-title: Biodiversity in agriculture year: 2012 ident: 235_CR10 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139019514.013 contributor: fullname: MA Zeder – volume: 41 start-page: 229 year: 2014 ident: 235_CR12 publication-title: Evol Biol doi: 10.1007/s11692-013-9262-3 contributor: fullname: V Maselli – volume: 11 start-page: 887 year: 2022 ident: 235_CR14 publication-title: Land doi: 10.3390/land11060887 contributor: fullname: D Fulgione – volume: 116 start-page: 17231 year: 2019 ident: 235_CR3 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901169116 contributor: fullname: LAF Frantz – volume: 36 start-page: 815 year: 2017 ident: 235_CR48 publication-title: Coral Reefs doi: 10.1007/s00338-017-1572-y contributor: fullname: MJ Sweet – volume: 7 start-page: 12950 year: 2016 ident: 235_CR20 publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/ncomms12950 contributor: fullname: M Johnsson – volume: 8 start-page: 103 year: 2020 ident: 235_CR54 publication-title: Microbiome doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0 contributor: fullname: G Berg – volume: 48 start-page: 23 year: 2016 ident: 235_CR2 publication-title: Genet Sel Evol doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0204-2 contributor: fullname: MAM Groenen – volume-title: Domestication: the decline of environmental appreciation year: 1990 ident: 235_CR7 contributor: fullname: H Hemmer – volume: 8 year: 2013 ident: 235_CR38 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068739 contributor: fullname: C Milani – volume: 20 start-page: 1630 year: 2019 ident: 235_CR59 publication-title: IJMS doi: 10.3390/ijms20071630 contributor: fullname: B Adhikari – volume: 16 start-page: 611 year: 2015 ident: 235_CR33 publication-title: Nat Rev Genet doi: 10.1038/nrg3982 contributor: fullname: SF Gilbert – volume: 3 start-page: 77 year: 1995 ident: 235_CR21 publication-title: Journal of Mountain Ecology. contributor: fullname: G Uhr – volume: 5 start-page: 151 year: 2017 ident: 235_CR31 publication-title: Microbiome doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0370-7 contributor: fullname: G Dubois – volume: 27 start-page: 325 year: 1957 ident: 235_CR43 publication-title: Ecol Monogr doi: 10.2307/1942268 contributor: fullname: JR Bray – ident: 235_CR6 – ident: 235_CR45 – volume: 95 start-page: fiz121 year: 2019 ident: 235_CR22 publication-title: FEMS Microbiol Ecol doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz121 contributor: fullname: G Alessandri – volume: 449 start-page: 811 year: 2007 ident: 235_CR29 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature06245 contributor: fullname: L Dethlefsen – volume: 8 start-page: 868 year: 2020 ident: 235_CR60 publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060868 contributor: fullname: AM Arfken – volume: 81 start-page: 610 year: 2014 ident: 235_CR17 publication-title: Italian J Zool doi: 10.1080/11250003.2014.953220 contributor: fullname: V Maselli – volume: 45 start-page: 115 year: 2014 ident: 235_CR1 publication-title: Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135813 contributor: fullname: G Larson – ident: 235_CR32 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818030-3.00003-9 – volume: 5 year: 2009 ident: 235_CR9 publication-title: PLoS Genet doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000341 contributor: fullname: M Fang – volume: 118 start-page: 154 year: 2017 ident: 235_CR5 publication-title: Heredity doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.74 contributor: fullname: C Lega – ident: 235_CR49 – volume: 9 year: 2013 ident: 235_CR11 publication-title: PLoS Genet doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003453 contributor: fullname: S Wilkinson – volume: 6 start-page: 90 year: 2018 ident: 235_CR41 publication-title: Microbiome doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z contributor: fullname: NA Bokulich – volume: 15 start-page: 6 year: 2015 ident: 235_CR18 publication-title: BMC Evol Biol doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0269-x contributor: fullname: A Evin – volume: 123 start-page: 11 year: 2017 ident: 235_CR24 publication-title: Zoology doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2017.05.003 contributor: fullname: D Fulgione – volume: 8 start-page: 1886 year: 2020 ident: 235_CR26 publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121886 contributor: fullname: GE Gardiner – volume: 26 start-page: 327 year: 2016 ident: 235_CR4 publication-title: The Holocene doi: 10.1177/0959683615596842 contributor: fullname: C Lega – volume: 31 start-page: 689 year: 2016 ident: 235_CR34 publication-title: Trends Ecol Evol doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.06.008 contributor: fullname: A Alberdi – volume: 50 start-page: 451 year: 2019 ident: 235_CR36 publication-title: Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062453 contributor: fullname: NA Moran – volume: 26 start-page: 5515 year: 2017 ident: 235_CR30 publication-title: Mol Ecol doi: 10.1111/mec.14278 contributor: fullname: XX Wasimuddin – volume: 9 start-page: 2261 year: 2015 ident: 235_CR47 publication-title: ISME J doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.39 contributor: fullname: TD Ainsworth – volume: 11 start-page: 671 year: 2020 ident: 235_CR16 publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14515-6 contributor: fullname: S Zhang – volume: 548 start-page: 43 year: 2017 ident: 235_CR35 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature23292 contributor: fullname: KR Foster – start-page: 641 volume-title: The Prokaryotes year: 2014 ident: 235_CR57 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30197-1_302 contributor: fullname: SP Glaeser – volume: 9 start-page: 769 year: 2016 ident: 235_CR13 publication-title: Evol Appl doi: 10.1111/eva.12383 contributor: fullname: D Fulgione – volume: 115 start-page: 293 year: 2015 ident: 235_CR52 publication-title: Heredity doi: 10.1038/hdy.2015.8 contributor: fullname: CJ Murren – ident: 235_CR15 doi: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dwvg.19 – volume: 4 start-page: 9 year: 2001 ident: 235_CR44 publication-title: Palaeontol Electron contributor: fullname: Ø Hammer – volume: 12 start-page: R60 year: 2011 ident: 235_CR50 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 contributor: fullname: N Segata – volume: 87 start-page: 835 year: 2016 ident: 235_CR25 publication-title: Anim Sci J doi: 10.1111/asj.12492 contributor: fullname: K Ushida – volume: 12 start-page: 12682 year: 2022 ident: 235_CR37 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16955-0 contributor: fullname: M Buglione – volume: 44 start-page: 124 year: 2014 ident: 235_CR23 publication-title: Mammal Rev doi: 10.1111/mam.12015 contributor: fullname: SA Ballari – volume: 13 start-page: 161 year: 2019 ident: 235_CR27 publication-title: Front Behav Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00161 contributor: fullname: S Menneson – volume: 33 start-page: 496 year: 2015 ident: 235_CR55 publication-title: Trends Biotechnol doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.011 contributor: fullname: N-R Shin – volume: 41 start-page: D590 year: 2012 ident: 235_CR42 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 contributor: fullname: C Quast – volume: 65 start-page: 73 year: 2005 ident: 235_CR8 publication-title: Brain Behav Evol doi: 10.1159/000082979 contributor: fullname: DCT Kruska – volume: 31 start-page: 814 year: 2013 ident: 235_CR51 publication-title: Nat Biotechnol doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676 contributor: fullname: MGI Langille – volume: 13 start-page: e0201901 year: 2018 ident: 235_CR58 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201901 contributor: fullname: T Kubasova – volume: 13 start-page: 581 year: 2016 ident: 235_CR40 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 contributor: fullname: BJ Callahan – ident: 235_CR19 doi: 10.1111/mec.16238 – volume: 7 start-page: 2594 year: 2017 ident: 235_CR28 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4 contributor: fullname: T Chen – volume: 16 start-page: 169 year: 2015 ident: 235_CR46 publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0611-3 contributor: fullname: H Heberle – volume: 17 year: 2019 ident: 235_CR53 publication-title: PLoS Biol doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000533 contributor: fullname: LGE Wilkins |
SSID | ssj0002313629 |
Score | 2.3001456 |
Snippet | Wild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under natural selection)... Abstract Background Wild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under... BackgroundWild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under natural... BACKGROUNDWild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under natural... Abstract Background Wild boar has experienced several evolutionary trajectories from which domestic (under artificial selection) and the feral pig (under... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 14 |
SubjectTerms | Adaptability Adaptation Animals Developmental stages Digestive system DNA barcoding DNA sequencing Domestic animals Domestication Evolution Feces Feral populations Feralization Gastrointestinal tract Gut microbiota Hogs Intestinal microflora Metabolism Microbiota Natural selection Next-generation sequencing Phylogeny Reprogramming rRNA 16S Software Sus scrofa Taxonomy |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA7iyYvo-qovIniTsts0aZKjissi6MUHewtpmuoK2xW3i_58Z9LusiuCFw-5NCmkM5PMN53kG0LORel54TGnXiRZDIiYxbpkPHbO57zgzstQreHuPhs88duhGC6V-sIzYQ09cCO4rpRC6kJopyzjUjlbSLA5VoJnVc6xIuy-iVgKpt4CiUsCO7Oe35JRWXcKxskwZQkNOV7irxVPFAj7f0OZPw9LLnmf_hbZbGEjvWymu03WfNUhnWc8yxIu1NK7Nke-QwaAqZtDV2NwS3RSUsB49GVW0_GoYV2qLS1B_ZNP7C_xp1R7GZOOKvowm9Ip7s52lzz1bx6vB3FbLyF2XGd1rKyzQkjZ85pn3CuAoqnPMeLAqEuxxAulc6G81i7hDJarQ-UIb5MUcINK98h6Nan8AaF5kdpcS4hfreXwhpKldghdSgBwPrcRuZjLzrw3tBgmhBMqM42kTQ8bStp8ReQKxbsYiZTW4QEo2rSKNn8pOiLHc-WYdp1NDThX-Ezk8InI2aIbVgimPWzlJzMYI1XIV2oYs9_ocjGTNMOC70JGRK5oeWWqqz3V6DWwcGvAplz2Dv_j247IBguWyWLGj8l6_THzJwB26vw02PU37YH7Wg priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagvXBBpbxCW2QkbsjqxrFj-4QoarVCaoWAot4sx3bKHpqUJqv253fG8S5dhDj4EjuSNS9_4xnPEPJetlGEiDH1UNYMEDFnpuWCeR8bEYSPKnVrOD2r5-fiy4W8yBduQ06rXNnEZKhD7_GO_BDMqNbonuiP178Zdo3C6GpuofGYbPNSYJh2--j47Ou39S0LoBew0Gb1WkbXhwMIKcfQJQys9cLuNk6kVLj_X2jz76TJB6fQyQ55muEj_TTx-xl5FLtdsvsTc1rSw1p6mmPlz8kcsPWUfHUFxxPtWwpYj14uR3q1mKovjY62IAb9Lc63eDmVH2XSRUe_Lwc6oJV2L8j5yfGPz3OW-yYwL0w9Mu28k1KpWTSiFhHIFqrYoOeB3pfmZZTaNFJHY3wpOKitRybJ6MoK8IOuXpKtru_ia0KbULnGKPBjnRPwh1at8QhhWqB2bFxBPqxoZ6-n8hg2uRW6thOl7QwHUtreFeQIybteiaWt04f-5tJmTbFKSWWCNF47LpT2LijgPG8BSmnveSjI_oo5NuvbYP9IR0HeradBUzD84brYL2GN0iluaWDNq4mX651UNTZ-l6ogaoPLG1vdnOkWv1I1bgMYVajZm_9va4884UnmOONin2yNN8t4AHBmbN5mmb0Hw8P0nA priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Reprogramming of the gut microbiota following feralization in Sus scrofa |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823657 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2848810228 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2780064098 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9951470 https://doaj.org/article/77579d59c8a2478cad74882f6398cc2d |
Volume | 5 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1NT9wwEB0BvfRStfQrha6MxK0Ku3Hs2D4WBFohLUK0VNwix3Hoom6C2KzKz--Mk6x2q5568CW2JWdm7Hn2jJ8BjmXlRekppl4mWYyImMem4iJ2zheiFM6r8FrD7Cqb3orLO3m3A3K4CxOS9l0xP6l_LU7q-c-QW_m4cOMhT2x8PTszCAuEmox3YVel6cYW_SHwtyS4KJvhgozOxku0S07RSixE7xIT-XSa0VPf5JU2_FGg7f8X1vw7ZXLDB128hlc9eGRfu0G-gR1f78P-D8poCddq2ayPlL-FKSLrLvVqgc6JNRVDpMfuVy1bzDvupdayCo2g-U31FR1N9Vcy2bxm31ZLtqQ12r6D24vz72fTuH81IXbCZG2srbNSKjXxRmTCawSkqS9o30F7L80TL7UppPbGuERwnLSOVCS9TVJEDzp9D3t1U_uPwIoytYVBEWtrBfbQqjKOAEyFMM4XNoIvg-zyx44cIw-bCp3lndDzCRUSev4cwSmJd92SiK3Dh-bpPu_VmysllSmlcdpyobSzpcIlhlcIpLRzvIzgcFBO3s-2ZY4uFn-TmHwiOFpX4zyh4IetfbPCNkqHqKXBNh86Xa5HMthCBGpLy1tD3a5B0wxc3L0pfvrvngfwkgfL5DEXh7DXPq38Z8Q5bTGCF6fnV9c3o3BOMApW_gfrP_7M |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,21416,27955,27956,33777,33778,43838,53825,53827,74657 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwEB7B9gCXCsqjgVKMxA1F3XXs2D4hilot0F0haFFvluM47R6alCYr-vOZSbxLFyEOvsSOZM3L33jGMwBvZRVEGSimXk7yFBExT03FRep9KEQpfFB9t4bZPJ-eic_n8jxeuLUxrXJlE3tDXTae7sgP0IxqTe6Jfn_9M6WuURRdjS007sMWldzUI9g6PJp__ba-ZUH0ghbarF7L6PygRSHlFLrEQbVe0tuNE6kv3P8vtPl30uSdU-j4EWxH-Mg-DPx-DPdCvQM7PyinpX9Yy2YxVv4Epoith-SrKzyeWFMxxHrsYtmxq8VQfalzrEIxaH7RfEWXU_FRJlvU7PuyZS1ZafcUzo6PTj9O09g3IfXC5F2qnXdSKjUORuQiINnKLBTkeZD3pfkkSG0KqYMxfiI4qq0nJsngJhniB509g1Hd1GEXWFFmrjAK_VjnBP6hVWU8QZgKgVwoXALvVrSz10N5DNu7FTq3A6XtmAZR2t4mcEjkXa-k0tb9h-bmwkZNsUpJZUppvHZcKO1dqZDzvEIopb3nZQJ7K-bYqG-t_SMdCbxZT6OmUPjD1aFZ4hql-7ilwTXPB16ud5Ll1PhdqgTUBpc3tro5Uy8u-2rcBjGqUOMX_9_Wa3gwPZ2d2JNP8y8v4SHv5Y-nXOzBqLtZhlcIbbpiP8rvb3yh95I |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELaglRAXBOXRQFuMxA1Zu-vYsX1CtHS1PLqqgKLeLMexyx6alCYr-vOZSbxLFyEOvsSOZM3L33jGM4S8ljGIKmBMvZoUDBAxZyZywbwPpaiED6rv1nAyL2Zn4uO5PE_5T21Kq1zZxN5QV43HO_IRmFGt0T3Ro5jSIk7fT99e_WTYQQojramdxl2yrUQhwRHbPjyen35Z37gAkgFrbVYvZ3QxakFgOYYxYWDdF3azcTr1Rfz_hTz_TqC8dSJNH5IHCUrSdwPvH5E7od4hO98xv6V_ZEtPUtz8MZkBzh4SsS7hqKJNpID76MWyo5eLoRJT52gEkWh-4XzEi6r0QJMuavp12dIWLbZ7Qs6mx9-OZiz1UGBemKJj2nknpVLjYEQhApCwykOJXgh6YppPgtSmlDoY4yeCgwp7ZJgMbpIDltD5U7JVN3XYJbSsclcaBT6tcwL-0Coaj3AmAqgLpcvImxXt7NVQKsP2LoYu7EBpO8aBlLY3GTlE8q5XYpnr_kNzfWGT1lilpDKVNF47LpT2rlIgBTwCrNLe8yojeyvm2KR7rf0jKRl5tZ4GrcFQiKtDs4Q1SvcxTANrng28XO8kL7AJvFQZURtc3tjq5ky9-NFX5jaAV4UaP___tl6SeyC69vOH-acX5D7vxY8zLvbIVne9DPuAcrryIInvbxL1-8Y |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reprogramming+of+the+gut+microbiota+following+feralization+in+Sus+scrofa&rft.jtitle=Animal+microbiome&rft.au=Simona+Petrelli&rft.au=Maria+Buglione&rft.au=Eleonora+Rivieccio&rft.au=Ezio+Ricca&rft.date=2023-02-24&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=2524-4671&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs42523-023-00235-x&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_77579d59c8a2478cad74882f6398cc2d |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2524-4671&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2524-4671&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2524-4671&client=summon |