Local recurrence and subsequent endoscopic treatment after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection with or without precutting in the colorectum
Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases. The medi...
Saved in:
Published in | Intestinal Research Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 502 - 510 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases
01.10.2017
대한장연구학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1598-9100 2288-1956 |
DOI | 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502 |
Cover
Abstract | Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases.
The medical records of patients with colorectal polyps treated by EPMR were analyzed. Patients without follow-up surveillance colonoscopies were excluded.
Among 359 lesions, the local recurrence rate on the first surveillance colonoscopy was 5.8% (18/312) and 6.4% (3/47) after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Among lesions without recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy, the rates of late recurrence on subsequent surveillance colonoscopy were 3.9% (6/152) and 0% after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Larger tumor size was the only independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 7.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-32.30;
<0.001). Endoscopic treatment was performed for all 27 recurrences. A combination of ≥2 endoscopic treatment modalities was used in 19 of 27 recurrences (70.4%). Surveillance colonoscopies were performed in 20 of 27 recurrences after endoscopic treatment. One (5.0%) had a re-recurrence and was treated by surgical resection because recurrence occurred at the appendiceal orifice. Nineteen of 20 lesions (95.0%) could be cured endoscopically, although 3 of the 19 showed second or third recurrences and were treated by repeat endoscopic resection.
The local recurrence rates after CEPMR and PEPMR were similar. Larger tumor size was an independent risk factor for local recurrence after EPMR. Endoscopic treatment of recurrences resulted in high cure rates, although combination methods were necessary in many cases. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases.
The medical records of patients with colorectal polyps treated by EPMR were analyzed. Patients without follow-up surveillance colonoscopies were excluded.
Among 359 lesions, the local recurrence rate on the first surveillance colonoscopy was 5.8% (18/312) and 6.4% (3/47) after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Among lesions without recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy, the rates of late recurrence on subsequent surveillance colonoscopy were 3.9% (6/152) and 0% after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Larger tumor size was the only independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 7.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-32.30;
<0.001). Endoscopic treatment was performed for all 27 recurrences. A combination of ≥2 endoscopic treatment modalities was used in 19 of 27 recurrences (70.4%). Surveillance colonoscopies were performed in 20 of 27 recurrences after endoscopic treatment. One (5.0%) had a re-recurrence and was treated by surgical resection because recurrence occurred at the appendiceal orifice. Nineteen of 20 lesions (95.0%) could be cured endoscopically, although 3 of the 19 showed second or third recurrences and were treated by repeat endoscopic resection.
The local recurrence rates after CEPMR and PEPMR were similar. Larger tumor size was an independent risk factor for local recurrence after EPMR. Endoscopic treatment of recurrences resulted in high cure rates, although combination methods were necessary in many cases. Background/Aims: Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases.Methods: The medical records of patients with colorectal polyps treated by EPMR were analyzed. Patients without follow-up surveillance colonoscopies were excluded.Results: Among 359 lesions, the local recurrence rate on the first surveillance colonoscopy was 5.8% (18/312) and 6.4% (3/47) after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Among lesions without recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy, the rates of late recurrence on subsequent surveillance colonoscopy were 3.9% (6/152) and 0% after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Larger tumor size was the only independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 7.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.95–32.30; P<0.001). Endoscopic treatment was performed for all 27 recurrences. A combination of ≥2 endoscopic treatment modalities was used in 19 of 27 recurrences (70.4%). Surveillance colonoscopies were performed in 20 of 27 recurrences after endoscopic treatment. One (5.0%) had a re-recurrence and was treated by surgical resection because recurrence occurred at the appendiceal orifice. Nineteen of 20 lesions (95.0%) could be cured endoscopically, although 3 of the 19 showed second or third recurrences and were treated by repeat endoscopic resection.Conclusions: The local recurrence rates after CEPMR and PEPMR were similar. Larger tumor size was an independent risk factor for local recurrence after EPMR. Endoscopic treatment of recurrences resulted in high cure rates, although combination methods were necessary in many cases. Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases.BACKGROUND/AIMSPrecutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases.The medical records of patients with colorectal polyps treated by EPMR were analyzed. Patients without follow-up surveillance colonoscopies were excluded.METHODSThe medical records of patients with colorectal polyps treated by EPMR were analyzed. Patients without follow-up surveillance colonoscopies were excluded.Among 359 lesions, the local recurrence rate on the first surveillance colonoscopy was 5.8% (18/312) and 6.4% (3/47) after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Among lesions without recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy, the rates of late recurrence on subsequent surveillance colonoscopy were 3.9% (6/152) and 0% after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Larger tumor size was the only independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 7.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-32.30; P<0.001). Endoscopic treatment was performed for all 27 recurrences. A combination of ≥2 endoscopic treatment modalities was used in 19 of 27 recurrences (70.4%). Surveillance colonoscopies were performed in 20 of 27 recurrences after endoscopic treatment. One (5.0%) had a re-recurrence and was treated by surgical resection because recurrence occurred at the appendiceal orifice. Nineteen of 20 lesions (95.0%) could be cured endoscopically, although 3 of the 19 showed second or third recurrences and were treated by repeat endoscopic resection.RESULTSAmong 359 lesions, the local recurrence rate on the first surveillance colonoscopy was 5.8% (18/312) and 6.4% (3/47) after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Among lesions without recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy, the rates of late recurrence on subsequent surveillance colonoscopy were 3.9% (6/152) and 0% after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Larger tumor size was the only independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 7.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-32.30; P<0.001). Endoscopic treatment was performed for all 27 recurrences. A combination of ≥2 endoscopic treatment modalities was used in 19 of 27 recurrences (70.4%). Surveillance colonoscopies were performed in 20 of 27 recurrences after endoscopic treatment. One (5.0%) had a re-recurrence and was treated by surgical resection because recurrence occurred at the appendiceal orifice. Nineteen of 20 lesions (95.0%) could be cured endoscopically, although 3 of the 19 showed second or third recurrences and were treated by repeat endoscopic resection.The local recurrence rates after CEPMR and PEPMR were similar. Larger tumor size was an independent risk factor for local recurrence after EPMR. Endoscopic treatment of recurrences resulted in high cure rates, although combination methods were necessary in many cases.CONCLUSIONSThe local recurrence rates after CEPMR and PEPMR were similar. Larger tumor size was an independent risk factor for local recurrence after EPMR. Endoscopic treatment of recurrences resulted in high cure rates, although combination methods were necessary in many cases. Background/Aims: Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases. Methods: The medical records of patients with colorectal polyps treated by EPMR were analyzed. Patients without follow-up surveillance colonoscopies were excluded. Results: Among 359 lesions, the local recurrence rate on the first surveillance colonoscopy was 5.8% (18/312) and 6.4% (3/47) after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Among lesions without recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy, the rates of late recurrence on subsequent surveillance colonoscopy were 3.9% (6/152) and 0% after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Larger tumor size was the only independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 7.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.95–32.30; P<0.001). Endoscopic treatment was performed for all 27 recurrences. A combination of ≥2 endoscopic treatment modalities was used in 19 of 27 recurrences (70.4%). Surveillance colonoscopies were performed in 20 of 27 recurrences after endoscopic treatment. One (5.0%) had a re-recurrence and was treated by surgical resection because recurrence occurred at the appendiceal orifice. Nineteen of 20 lesions (95.0%) could be cured endoscopically, although 3 of the 19 showed second or third recurrences and were treated by repeat endoscopic resection. Conclusions: The local recurrence rates after CEPMR and PEPMR were similar. Larger tumor size was an independent risk factor for local recurrence after EPMR. Endoscopic treatment of recurrences resulted in high cure rates, although combination methods were necessary in many cases. KCI Citation Count: 0 |
Author | Song, Eun Mi Park, Sang Hyoung Yang, Suk-Kyun Seo, Myeongsook Kim, Gwang Un Yang, Dong-Hoon Ye, Byong Duk Myung, Seung-Jae Hwang, Sung Wook Kim, Kyung-Jo Byeon, Jeong-Sik |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Myeongsook surname: Seo fullname: Seo, Myeongsook organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Eun Mi surname: Song fullname: Song, Eun Mi organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Gwang Un surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Gwang Un organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Sung Wook surname: Hwang fullname: Hwang, Sung Wook organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Sang Hyoung surname: Park fullname: Park, Sang Hyoung organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 6 givenname: Dong-Hoon surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Dong-Hoon organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 7 givenname: Kyung-Jo surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Kyung-Jo organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 8 givenname: Byong Duk surname: Ye fullname: Ye, Byong Duk organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 9 givenname: Seung-Jae surname: Myung fullname: Myung, Seung-Jae organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 10 givenname: Suk-Kyun surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Suk-Kyun organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 11 givenname: Jeong-Sik surname: Byeon fullname: Byeon, Jeong-Sik organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29142518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002275332$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp1Uk1v1DAQjVARLaV3TihHOOxiO7ZjX5Cqio-VKiGhvVv-mGxNE3uxnSL-BL8ZZ7dULRIXjzTz3ps3nnnZnIQYoGleY7RmBPfvfVoThPs1Zmu6Zog8a84IEWKFJeMnzRlmUqwkRui0ucjZG0RpT7HsuhfNKZGYEobFWfP7Olo9tgnsnBIEC60Ors2zyfBjhlBaCC5mG_fetiWBLtOS1EOB9Li092Bhgqo0zTbmg2IGW3wM7U9fbtqYDjHOpd0vzUrxYdf60JYbaG0cY02WeXrVPB_0mOHiPp43208ft1dfVtdfP2-uLq9XlkpeVoQBsg71g6aODZ1xYJGWnTa6zitY39UHHFBgxmGhhdCMyY44ZoxxDHfnzbujbEiDurVeRe0PcRfVbVKX37YbRZAUvOMVuzliXdTf1T75SadfB8IhEdNO6VS8HUFRKQdu3IB6bSnhnUBGDh2nHHpruGZV68NRaz-bCZytf5n0-ET0aSX4m-rpTjEuOikW42_vBVKs-8lFTT5bGEcdIM5ZYckZoRzjxfebx70emvzdfQWgI8CmmHOC4QGCkVouTPmklgtTmCmq6oVVCv-HYn3Ry5arWz_-n_gHCbzaOA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2019_11_041 crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_70066 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpsurg_2022_101124 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_021_08664_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10151_022_02623_y crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001951 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_019_05822_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2019_12_051 crossref_primary_10_1159_000518445 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1744133124000148 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_024_02325_2 crossref_primary_10_5217_ir_2019_00092 crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2024_2440403 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00464-012-2164-0 10.3748/wjg.v16.i22.2806 10.5217/ir.2016.14.4.358 10.1055/s-0034-1364970 10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8 10.1136/gut.47.2.251 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.1512 10.1007/s00464-010-1169-9 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.037 10.1067/mge.2001.115729 10.1038/ajg.2015.96 10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.52 10.1007/s00384-008-0596-8 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1248 10.1007/s00464-015-4497-y 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834aa47b 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.007 10.1007/s10620-015-3755-0 10.1038/ajg.2011.473 10.1055/s-2003-37254 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305516 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.003 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.318 10.1007/s00535-011-0524-5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright 2017. Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. 2017 Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright 2017. Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. 2017 Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA ACYCR |
DOI | 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Acceso a contenido Full Text - Doaj Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 2288-1956 |
EndPage | 510 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2098636 oai_doaj_org_article_499f6bdf07ac426380b9f3646e7cb6a5 PMC5683981 29142518 10_5217_ir_2017_15_4_502 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 5-W 53G 8JR 8XY AAYXX ABDBF ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AEGXH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV CITATION DIK EF. GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE HZB IPNFZ KQ8 M48 OK1 PGMZT RIG RPM M~E NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-25e0cd07fa4d5f3bdec0a93aba1008573085ede4e5bd18a88a55932d5bbbd513 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1598-9100 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:39:05 EST 2023 Wed Aug 27 01:13:55 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:36:15 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:23:39 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:55:01 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:11:37 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:48 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Endoscopic mucosal resection Piecemeal resection Colonic neoplasia |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c496t-25e0cd07fa4d5f3bdec0a93aba1008573085ede4e5bd18a88a55932d5bbbd513 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502 |
PMID | 29142518 |
PQID | 1965246116 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2098636 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_499f6bdf07ac426380b9f3646e7cb6a5 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5683981 proquest_miscellaneous_1965246116 pubmed_primary_29142518 crossref_primary_10_5217_ir_2017_15_4_502 crossref_citationtrail_10_5217_ir_2017_15_4_502 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-10-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2017 text: 2017-10-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Intestinal Research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Intest Res |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases 대한장연구학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases – name: 대한장연구학회 |
References | Yang (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref5) 2015; 60 Regula (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref20) 2003; 35 Hong (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref11) 2015; 48 Tajika (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref9) 2011; 23 Lee (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref8) 2012; 26 Sakamoto (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref12) 2012; 10 Kim (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref13) 2016; 30 Moss (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref1) 2015; 64 Kim (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref24) 2016; 14 Schlemper (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref15) 2000; 47 Tanaka (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref4) 2001; 54 Byeon (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref10) 2011; 74 Oka (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref3) 2015; 110 Sakamoto (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref14) 2011; 25 Sakamoto (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref19) 2012; 47 Belderbos (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref18) 2014; 46 Saito (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref7) 2010; 24 Holmes (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref22) 2016; 84 Kim (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref23) 2014; 80 Woodward (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref6) 2012; 107 Khashab (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref2) 2009; 70 Seo (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref16) 2010; 16 Tsiamoulos (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref21) 2012; 75 Hotta (10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref17) 2009; 24 |
References_xml | – volume: 26 start-page: 2220 year: 2012 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref8 publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2164-0 – volume: 16 start-page: 2806 year: 2010 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref16 publication-title: World J Gastroenterol doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i22.2806 – volume: 14 start-page: 358 year: 2016 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref24 publication-title: Intest Res doi: 10.5217/ir.2016.14.4.358 – volume: 46 start-page: 388 year: 2014 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref18 publication-title: Endoscopy doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1364970 – volume: 24 start-page: 343 year: 2010 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref7 publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8 – volume: 47 start-page: 251 year: 2000 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref15 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gut.47.2.251 – volume: 84 start-page: 822 year: 2016 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref22 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.1512 – volume: 25 start-page: 255 year: 2011 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref14 publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1169-9 – volume: 70 start-page: 344 year: 2009 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref2 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.037 – volume: 54 start-page: 62 year: 2001 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref4 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.115729 – volume: 110 start-page: 697 year: 2015 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref3 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.96 – volume: 48 start-page: 52 year: 2015 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref11 publication-title: Clin Endosc doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.52 – volume: 24 start-page: 225 year: 2009 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref17 publication-title: Int J Colorectal Dis doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0596-8 – volume: 74 start-page: 1075 year: 2011 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref10 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1248 – volume: 30 start-page: 2457 year: 2016 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref13 publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4497-y – volume: 23 start-page: 1042 year: 2011 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref9 publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834aa47b – volume: 10 start-page: 22 year: 2012 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref12 publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.007 – volume: 60 start-page: 3431 year: 2015 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref5 publication-title: Dig Dis Sci doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3755-0 – volume: 107 start-page: 650 year: 2012 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref6 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.473 – volume: 35 start-page: 212 year: 2003 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref20 publication-title: Endoscopy doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37254 – volume: 64 start-page: 57 year: 2015 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref1 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305516 – volume: 75 start-page: 400 year: 2012 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref21 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.003 – volume: 80 start-page: 1094 year: 2014 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref23 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.318 – volume: 47 start-page: 635 year: 2012 ident: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502_ref19 publication-title: J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1007/s00535-011-0524-5 |
SSID | ssib044741933 ssj0000607986 |
Score | 2.099908 |
Snippet | Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for... Background/Aims: Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify... |
SourceID | nrf doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 502 |
SubjectTerms | Colonic neoplasia Endoscopic mucosal resection Original Piecemeal resection 내과학 |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Acceso a contenido Full Text - Doaj dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELbQnrggEK_CggziwqGtXT-SHAGxWhBwWqS9WX5CtNSp0vRv8JuZcdKqRQguXJIotmPHM_bM2ONvCHnFtGVJeT9PToGBYuGp0bhuFUGWB9CZRYMHhT9_0Zdf5cdrdX0U6gt9wkZ44LHjlqCRJ-1CYpX1CC5eM9ckoaWOlXfaFvRS1rAjYwo4SUoQlGMceRDXOKIZG_coQVpVyxaBQHm14GohF2paUdnLpALdD5Im9-lPWufvzpNH0ujiLrkzqZH0zdj8e-RWzPfJz08omGiPS-jlEB-1OdAtTA3FX3qgMYcOj6G0nh4czGmJEn6ctGmjj2tQIOka3dnLF7fFYytTXLalXV_u3W6gG6ysuE7TNlNQJimiYOMsuls_IFcX76_eXc6neAtzLxs9zFcqMh9YlawMKgkXome2EdZZXoDwBVxiiDIqF3ht69qCOSJWQTnnguLiITnLXY6PCbWQvqq9UDxpqSoL5JdQOtU-OqlEmJHlvsONn7DIMSTGDwM2CZLItL1BEhmujDRAohl5fSixGXE4_pL3LdLwkA8RtMsL4Csz8ZX5F1_NyEvgAHPj21Ie7986c9MbsDM-QH1NrYWekRd7BjEwLHGvxebY7bYGgRoRqo9Dnkcjwxzas2o4zJS8npHqhJVOGnyaktvvBfpbaVBoa_7kf_zhU3Ibu230TDwnZ0O_i89Awxrc8zKYfgHCNyZW priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Local recurrence and subsequent endoscopic treatment after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection with or without precutting in the colorectum |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29142518 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1965246116 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5683981 https://doaj.org/article/499f6bdf07ac426380b9f3646e7cb6a5 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002275332 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Intestinal research, 2017, 15(4), , pp.502-510 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZQuXBBVLxCoTKIC4dNnfUjyQkBalUQ5dRKvVl-pUTtJks2K5ULP4HfzIyT3e6iFQcuSRTbSWTPeL5xxt8Q8pYpwyrp3KSyEhwUA1elwnWrALbcA2bmJW4UPvumTi_El0t5ebc9euzAxU7XDvNJXXQ36e2Pn-9B4QG_pmB88qMaeT2zPM1kKlKJzJL3wS4pdMXO7sC-EGA8yxHcDPM0y8uYChJMOmo9Y8N_zJ0PRdbgMgMJx_QgGyYsMv2DYWq6ahdI_TvWcsN4nTwiD0fUST8MYrJP7oXmMfn9Fe0Y7XDFPe75o6bxdAEzSQyv7mlofIu7VmpH1_HoNCYV3yya18GFGeBNOsPo9_jERQzwaiiu8tK2i-d22dM5vixGWtO6oYA9KZJm46S7nD0h5yfH559OJ2N6hokTpeonUxmY8yyvjPCy4tYHx0zJjTVZ5M3ncAg-iCCtzwpTFAa8Fz710lrrZcafkr2mbcJzQg2UTwvHZVYpIXMD0iKgdVW4YIXkPiFHqw7XbqQuxwwaNxpcGBwtXXcaR0tnUgsNo5WQd-sW84G24x91P-IYrush4Xa80XZXetRfDY5hpayvWG4cctwXzJYVV0KF3FllZELegAToa1fH9ni-avV1p8Et-QzvA0HjKiGvVwKiQYvx14xpQrtcaOR1RGa_DOo8GwRm_T0rsUtIviVKWx-8XdLU3yNTuFSAf4vsxX-3PCAPsK-G6MWXZK_vluEVoLDeHsbVi8OoYnj8dfwHyNozeg |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local+recurrence+and+subsequent+endoscopic+treatment+after+endoscopic+piecemeal+mucosal+resection+with+or+without+precutting+in+the+colorectum&rft.jtitle=Intestinal+research&rft.au=Seo%2C+Myeongsook&rft.au=Song%2C+Eun+Mi&rft.au=Kim%2C+Gwang+Un&rft.au=Hwang%2C+Sung+Wook&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.pub=Korean+Association+for+the+Study+of+Intestinal+Diseases&rft.issn=1598-9100&rft.eissn=2288-1956&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=502&rft.epage=510&rft_id=info:doi/10.5217%2Fir.2017.15.4.502&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F29142518&rft.externalDocID=PMC5683981 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1598-9100&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1598-9100&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1598-9100&client=summon |