Reliability, validity and minimum clinical importance difference of the Chinese version of the Zurich claudication questionnaire

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 16654 - 8
• Main Authors: Gao, Yi-xuan, Weng, Zhi-wen, Shao, Hui, Bo, Han, Chen, Zhi-hui, Song, Meng, Liu, Lu-ping, Zhang, Ling-yun, Liu, Jia-yu, Wang, Yu-han, Zhang, Meng-meng, Wang, Xi-you, Sun, Ya-nan, Yu, Chang-he
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 13.05.2025; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 692/308/409; 692/700; 692/700/565/411; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular diseases; China; Clinical Relevance; Disability Evaluation; Female; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Intermittent Claudication - diagnosis; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Middle Aged; Minimal Clinically Important Difference; multidisciplinary; Patients; Performance assessment; Performance evaluation; Questionnaires; Reliability; Reproducibility of Results; Responsiveness; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Severity of Illness Index; Spinal stenosis; Spinal Stenosis - diagnosis; Surveys and Questionnaires; The Zurich claudication questionnaire; Validity; China; Responsiveness; Validity; The Zurich claudication questionnaire; Reliability; Spinal stenosis

The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) has been translated and validated in multiple languages but few people have verified the measurement performance of the Chinese version of Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (Ch-ZCQ). The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of the Ch-ZCQ in l...