CT-generated radiographs in patients with pelvic ring injury: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs?
Pelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated images have higher diagnostic accuracy than plain films for the classification of acetabular fractures. However, similar studies have not been performed for...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 11; no. 26; p. 26 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
22.02.2016
BioMed Central |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Pelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated images have higher diagnostic accuracy than plain films for the classification of acetabular fractures. However, similar studies have not been performed for pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare CT-generated and plain radiographs in terms of the ability of surgeons at different experience levels to identify pelvic injury type.
CT-generated and plain radiograph image sets were created from 15 pelvic ring injury patients with known classification morphology. Three groups, each consisting of three orthopaedic surgeons representing different levels of expertise, viewed these image sets and recorded their diagnoses. These diagnoses were compared to the gold standard findings of the treating physician and to each other.
Overall, there was a significantly improved ability to correctly classify pelvic ring injury type by CT-generated radiographs as compared to plain radiographs (p < 0.01). However, analysis of the groups revealed that this difference was limited to the less experienced groups (p < 0.05).
CT-generated radiographs are diagnostically beneficial for less experienced surgeons and at least as good as conventional plain radiographs for experienced surgeons in classifying pelvic ring injuries. Therefore, CT-generated radiographs may be clinically valuable: sparing the patient additional radiation exposure and discomfort by avoiding the reordering of plain radiographs when the initial studies are of poor quality, as well as serving as a possible alternative for supplemental initial injury plain radiographic views. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Pelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated images have higher diagnostic accuracy than plain films for the classification of acetabular fractures. However, similar studies have not been performed for pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare CT-generated and plain radiographs in terms of the ability of surgeons at different experience levels to identify pelvic injury type.
CT-generated and plain radiograph image sets were created from 15 pelvic ring injury patients with known classification morphology. Three groups, each consisting of three orthopaedic surgeons representing different levels of expertise, viewed these image sets and recorded their diagnoses. These diagnoses were compared to the gold standard findings of the treating physician and to each other.
Overall, there was a significantly improved ability to correctly classify pelvic ring injury type by CT-generated radiographs as compared to plain radiographs (p < 0.01). However, analysis of the groups revealed that this difference was limited to the less experienced groups (p < 0.05).
CT-generated radiographs are diagnostically beneficial for less experienced surgeons and at least as good as conventional plain radiographs for experienced surgeons in classifying pelvic ring injuries. Therefore, CT-generated radiographs may be clinically valuable: sparing the patient additional radiation exposure and discomfort by avoiding the reordering of plain radiographs when the initial studies are of poor quality, as well as serving as a possible alternative for supplemental initial injury plain radiographic views. BACKGROUNDPelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated images have higher diagnostic accuracy than plain films for the classification of acetabular fractures. However, similar studies have not been performed for pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare CT-generated and plain radiographs in terms of the ability of surgeons at different experience levels to identify pelvic injury type.METHODSCT-generated and plain radiograph image sets were created from 15 pelvic ring injury patients with known classification morphology. Three groups, each consisting of three orthopaedic surgeons representing different levels of expertise, viewed these image sets and recorded their diagnoses. These diagnoses were compared to the gold standard findings of the treating physician and to each other.RESULTSOverall, there was a significantly improved ability to correctly classify pelvic ring injury type by CT-generated radiographs as compared to plain radiographs (p < 0.01). However, analysis of the groups revealed that this difference was limited to the less experienced groups (p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONSCT-generated radiographs are diagnostically beneficial for less experienced surgeons and at least as good as conventional plain radiographs for experienced surgeons in classifying pelvic ring injuries. Therefore, CT-generated radiographs may be clinically valuable: sparing the patient additional radiation exposure and discomfort by avoiding the reordering of plain radiographs when the initial studies are of poor quality, as well as serving as a possible alternative for supplemental initial injury plain radiographic views. Background Pelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated images have higher diagnostic accuracy than plain films for the classification of acetabular fractures. However, similar studies have not been performed for pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare CT-generated and plain radiographs in terms of the ability of surgeons at different experience levels to identify pelvic injury type. Methods CT-generated and plain radiograph image sets were created from 15 pelvic ring injury patients with known classification morphology. Three groups, each consisting of three orthopaedic surgeons representing different levels of expertise, viewed these image sets and recorded their diagnoses. These diagnoses were compared to the gold standard findings of the treating physician and to each other. Results Overall, there was a significantly improved ability to correctly classify pelvic ring injury type by CT-generated radiographs as compared to plain radiographs (p < 0.01). However, analysis of the groups revealed that this difference was limited to the less experienced groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions CT-generated radiographs are diagnostically beneficial for less experienced surgeons and at least as good as conventional plain radiographs for experienced surgeons in classifying pelvic ring injuries. Therefore, CT-generated radiographs may be clinically valuable: sparing the patient additional radiation exposure and discomfort by avoiding the reordering of plain radiographs when the initial studies are of poor quality, as well as serving as a possible alternative for supplemental initial injury plain radiographic views. Keywords: Pelvic ring injury, CT-generated radiographs, Pelvic fractures Background Pelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated images have higher diagnostic accuracy than plain films for the classification of acetabular fractures. However, similar studies have not been performed for pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare CT-generated and plain radiographs in terms of the ability of surgeons at different experience levels to identify pelvic injury type. Methods CT-generated and plain radiograph image sets were created from 15 pelvic ring injury patients with known classification morphology. Three groups, each consisting of three orthopaedic surgeons representing different levels of expertise, viewed these image sets and recorded their diagnoses. These diagnoses were compared to the gold standard findings of the treating physician and to each other. Results Overall, there was a significantly improved ability to correctly classify pelvic ring injury type by CT-generated radiographs as compared to plain radiographs (p < 0.01). However, analysis of the groups revealed that this difference was limited to the less experienced groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions CT-generated radiographs are diagnostically beneficial for less experienced surgeons and at least as good as conventional plain radiographs for experienced surgeons in classifying pelvic ring injuries. Therefore, CT-generated radiographs may be clinically valuable: sparing the patient additional radiation exposure and discomfort by avoiding the reordering of plain radiographs when the initial studies are of poor quality, as well as serving as a possible alternative for supplemental initial injury plain radiographic views. Pelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated images have higher diagnostic accuracy than plain films for the classification of acetabular fractures. However, similar studies have not been performed for pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare CT-generated and plain radiographs in terms of the ability of surgeons at different experience levels to identify pelvic injury type. CT-generated and plain radiograph image sets were created from 15 pelvic ring injury patients with known classification morphology. Three groups, each consisting of three orthopaedic surgeons representing different levels of expertise, viewed these image sets and recorded their diagnoses. These diagnoses were compared to the gold standard findings of the treating physician and to each other. Overall, there was a significantly improved ability to correctly classify pelvic ring injury type by CT-generated radiographs as compared to plain radiographs (p < 0.01). However, analysis of the groups revealed that this difference was limited to the less experienced groups (p < 0.05). CT-generated radiographs are diagnostically beneficial for less experienced surgeons and at least as good as conventional plain radiographs for experienced surgeons in classifying pelvic ring injuries. Therefore, CT-generated radiographs may be clinically valuable: sparing the patient additional radiation exposure and discomfort by avoiding the reordering of plain radiographs when the initial studies are of poor quality, as well as serving as a possible alternative for supplemental initial injury plain radiographic views. |
ArticleNumber | 26 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Abdelfattah, Adham A Moed, Berton R |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Adham A surname: Abdelfattah fullname: Abdelfattah, Adham A organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Avenue, 7th Floor Desloge Towers, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Berton R surname: Moed fullname: Moed, Berton R email: moedbr@slu.edu, moedbr@slu.edu organization: The Hansjörg Wyss Endowed Chair in Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Avenue, 7th Floor Desloge Towers, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. moedbr@slu.edu |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26898717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkktv1DAUhS1URB_wA9ggS2zYpPWNHT9YgKoRj0qV2BSJneVJbmY8ytjBTorm3-PRlDJFyAs_7neOde1zTk5CDEjIa2CXAFpeZeAMdMVAVoxLqOQzcgZKmEoZ8-PkaH1KznPeMNawRosX5LSW2mgF6owMi7tqhQGTm7CjyXU-rpIb15n6QEc3eQxTpr_8tKYjDve-pcmHVSlu5rR7T1sX6LTGHV0inXNxKKrB40xjT8fBld2R5ceX5HnvhoyvHuYL8v3zp7vF1-r225ebxfVt1Qojpsp0yDqnVSdb3tS8RzQN44Kh6DlvjVSdAKWVqFFxoZramU6C1MLxJQhRa35BPhx8x3m5xa4tPSQ32DH5rUs7G523TyvBr-0q3luhZA0SisG7B4MUf86YJ7v1ucVhcAHjnC0oWUgBghX07T_oJs4plPYKZXRhgDV_qZUb0PrQx3Jvuze110IIBoI3slCX_6HK6HDr2_L3vS_nTwRwELQp5pywf-wRmN1HxB4iYktE7D4idq95c_w4j4o_meC_Abxet24 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_018_3883_1 crossref_primary_10_5435_JAAOS_D_18_00102 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13319_019_0217_z crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_75884_y crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_19_22013 |
Cites_doi | 10.1148/radiographics.12.2.1561413 10.1016/0001-4575(90)90040-R 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00003 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c83bc0 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802ea951 10.1097/00005373-199612000-00009 10.1007/s002560050066 10.1097/00005373-198907000-00012 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00022 10.1148/radiology.165.2.3659379 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318188d6c3 10.1148/radiol.2412050960 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd. Copyright BioMed Central 2016 Abdelfattah and Moed. 2016 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Copyright BioMed Central 2016 – notice: Abdelfattah and Moed. 2016 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QP 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-016-0361-6 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X7 name: ProQuest Health and Medical url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1749-799X |
EndPage | 26 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4095555881 A444014356 10_1186_s13018_016_0361_6 26898717 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GeographicLocations | United States |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States |
GroupedDBID | --- -5E -5G -A0 -BR 0R~ 29L 2WC 3V. 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACPRK ACRMQ ADBBV ADINQ ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ECM EIF EJD EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPT ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E NPM O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW ~8M AAYXX CITATION 7QP 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-9de0da87d6c3523fee950340e4f33c967d4178742e734752a9d61684a3b144283 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1749-799X |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 21:01:20 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 04:50:38 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 16:29:27 EDT 2024 Tue Nov 19 21:29:36 EST 2024 Tue Nov 12 23:34:51 EST 2024 Thu Sep 12 19:12:26 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:57:47 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 26 |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c494t-9de0da87d6c3523fee950340e4f33c967d4178742e734752a9d61684a3b144283 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762161/ |
PMID | 26898717 |
PQID | 1798414105 |
PQPubID | 55349 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4762161 proquest_miscellaneous_1767624140 proquest_journals_1798414105 gale_infotracmisc_A444014356 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A444014356 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_016_0361_6 pubmed_primary_26898717 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-02-22 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-02-22 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2016 text: 2016-02-22 day: 22 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Orthop Surg Res |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central |
References | 20418733 - J Orthop Trauma. 2010 May;24(5):284-90 3659379 - Radiology. 1987 Nov;165(2):537-9 8769431 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):6-14 18277234 - J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10 Suppl):S1-133 18827587 - J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Oct;22(9):589-94 8970552 - J Trauma. 1996 Dec;41(6):994-8 2222708 - Accid Anal Prev. 1990 Oct;22(5):457-66 2746708 - J Trauma. 1989 Jul;29(7):981-1000; discussion 1000-2 1561413 - Radiographics. 1992 Mar;12(2):227-42 17005769 - Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):386-91 17211266 - J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Jan;21(1):31-7 8769450 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):186-93 7418324 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Sep;(151):56-64 8741053 - Skeletal Radiol. 1996 Apr;25(3):207-14 HR Mostafavi (361_CR10) 1996; 329 JWR Young (361_CR3) 1987 BS Kuszyk (361_CR14) 1996; 25 RV O’Toole (361_CR16) 2010; 24 EE Berg (361_CR11) 1996; 41 MLC Routt Jr (361_CR18) 2010 SA Dalal (361_CR6) 1989; 29 K Ohashi (361_CR17) 2006; 241 JL Marsh (361_CR5) 2007; 21 M Tile (361_CR4) 1995 PIII Tornetta (361_CR9) 1996; 329 JH Siegel (361_CR1) 1990; 22 W Smith (361_CR2) 2007; 21 SE Porter (361_CR12) 2008; 22 WW Scott (361_CR13) 1987; 165 HC Sagi (361_CR7) 2010 M Tile (361_CR8) 1980; 151 CR Martinez (361_CR15) 1992; 12 |
References_xml | – volume: 12 start-page: 227 year: 1992 ident: 361_CR15 publication-title: Radiographics doi: 10.1148/radiographics.12.2.1561413 contributor: fullname: CR Martinez – start-page: 323 volume-title: Orthopaedic knowledge update: trauma 4 year: 2010 ident: 361_CR18 contributor: fullname: MLC Routt Jr – volume: 22 start-page: 457 issue: 5 year: 1990 ident: 361_CR1 publication-title: Accid Anal Prev doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(90)90040-R contributor: fullname: JH Siegel – volume: 329 start-page: 6 year: 1996 ident: 361_CR10 publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00003 contributor: fullname: HR Mostafavi – volume: 21 start-page: S1 issue: Suppl 10 year: 2007 ident: 361_CR5 publication-title: J Orthop Trauma doi: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001 contributor: fullname: JL Marsh – start-page: 1415 volume-title: Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults year: 2010 ident: 361_CR7 contributor: fullname: HC Sagi – volume: 151 start-page: 56 year: 1980 ident: 361_CR8 publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res contributor: fullname: M Tile – volume: 24 start-page: 284 year: 2010 ident: 361_CR16 publication-title: J Orthop Trauma doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c83bc0 contributor: fullname: RV O’Toole – volume: 21 start-page: 31 year: 2007 ident: 361_CR2 publication-title: J Orthop Trauma doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802ea951 contributor: fullname: W Smith – volume: 41 start-page: 994 year: 1996 ident: 361_CR11 publication-title: J Trauma doi: 10.1097/00005373-199612000-00009 contributor: fullname: EE Berg – volume: 25 start-page: 207 year: 1996 ident: 361_CR14 publication-title: Skeletal Radiol doi: 10.1007/s002560050066 contributor: fullname: BS Kuszyk – volume: 29 start-page: 981 year: 1989 ident: 361_CR6 publication-title: J Trauma doi: 10.1097/00005373-198907000-00012 contributor: fullname: SA Dalal – volume: 329 start-page: 186 year: 1996 ident: 361_CR9 publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00022 contributor: fullname: PIII Tornetta – volume: 165 start-page: 537 year: 1987 ident: 361_CR13 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiology.165.2.3659379 contributor: fullname: WW Scott – volume: 22 start-page: 589 year: 2008 ident: 361_CR12 publication-title: J Orthop Trauma doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318188d6c3 contributor: fullname: SE Porter – volume-title: Radiologic management of pelvic ring fractures: systematic radiographic diagnosis year: 1987 ident: 361_CR3 contributor: fullname: JWR Young – volume-title: Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum year: 1995 ident: 361_CR4 contributor: fullname: M Tile – volume: 241 start-page: 386 year: 2006 ident: 361_CR17 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412050960 contributor: fullname: K Ohashi |
SSID | ssj0050584 |
Score | 2.1125083 |
Snippet | Pelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated images have... Background Pelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated... BACKGROUNDPelvic ring injury classification traditionally is made using plain radiographs. Recent studies suggest that computed tomography (CT)-generated... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 26 |
SubjectTerms | Analysis Clinical Competence CT imaging Diagnostic imaging Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging Fractures, Bone - surgery Humans Observer Variation Orthopedics Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging Pelvic Bones - injuries Retrospective Studies Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Na9wwEBXt5tJLSejXNklRoVAoiNjSWJJ7CWlICIWGUhLITdiS3G5ZvJt495B_3xlbu1330IvBaCzLo9HMkzR-YuwDji_VNFYLWXgQ0NgoammiMBi9Y621B0U_J3-71le38PWuuEsLbl1Kq9z4xN5Rh4WnNfITItaCPinxdHkv6NQo2l1NR2g8ZXsyV9ZO2N6Xi-vvPza-GMO7hbSXmVt90qHHzil5C2fRSudCj6LRvz55JyiNEyZ3ItDlPnueoCM_G_r6gD2J7Qs2P78RP3vqaISO_KEKs4GDuuOzlifS1I7Taitfxjm6BU4LeVj4G5X5maNiOULAR15Hvu6wBnwKUemaLxq-nFd4t1Pl6Ut2e3lxc34l0gkKwkMJK1GGmIXKmqA9Ai3VxFgWmYIsQqOUL7UJkOOIBRmNAlPIqgw61xYqVeNEC5HHKzZpF218w3gRbW2N1YYI0xFGVN6HkOFV1cT6Z6bs00aTbjkQZbh-gmG1G9TuKJmM1O70lH0kXTsaRKhQX6V_AfBVREflzgCAiAcLlDwaSaLx-3HxprdcGnyd-2sqU_Z-W0xPUkJZGxdrktFopiiVTdnroXO3zZbalrb_JDPq9q0AUXKPS9rZr56aG7BSxNBv_9-sQ_ZM9jYohZRHbLJ6WMdjxDar-l0y4D9-LfiE priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Open Access Journals dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3da9swEBdd97KXsbKvbF3RYDAYaHOksz4GpZSyUgbdUwN5E7YsbxnByeIE2v--d7IT4tKHvRiMTrJ9utP9JJ9-YuwT-peqa6uFzAMIqG0UpTRRGIzesdQ6gKLNyde_9NUEfk7z6QHbHm_VK7B9dGpH50lNVvOvt__uztDhT5PDW_2txXF4TClZODdWeiz0E_ZUYmCkDK9r2P1UwFifDiBGDO6EcW7a_-R8tIlBmHo4WO9Fq2Em5V5ounzBnveYkp93RnDEDmLzks0vbsTvxCmNmJKvimrWkVO3fNbwnk215bQMy5dxjuMFpxU-LPyLWv7OUeMcseEdLyPftNgC1kK4uuGLmi_nBd7tNXn2ik0uf9xcXIn-aAURwMFauCpmVWFNpQMiMFXH6PJMQRahVio4bSoYoyuDjEaByWXhKj3WFgpV4gwMIclrdtgsmviW8Tza0hqrDTGpI74oQqiqDK-qJDpAM2Jftpr0y45Bw6eZh9W-U7unLDNSu9cj9pl07am_UaGh6DcJ4KOIp8qfAwAxEuYoeTyQRK8Iw-Jtb_mtUXkiZ4OU2DpiH3fFVJMyzZq42JCMRvtFqWzE3nSdu3ttqa2z6ZPMoNt3AsTVPSxpZn8SZzdgowiu3_33971nz2QyRymkPGaH69UmfkD8sy5PklXfA-oqAE0 priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | CT-generated radiographs in patients with pelvic ring injury: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs? |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26898717 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1798414105 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1767624140 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4762161 |
Volume | 11 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdt97KXsbEvb13QYDAYqLGlsyT3ZWShpQRSytZC3oQty1tG6oQ6edh_35NsZ_Ee92JjdLLMfeju5NNPhHxC-xJVpSXjqQUGlXas4Moxhd7bFVJaEH5z8vxaXt3BbJEujkja74UJRfu2WJ7Vq_uzevkr1FZu7u24rxMb38yngCNgpDI-JsfofvsUvZ1-0aNr6H5fJlqOG5ykE1-vhYmzkAnzZxZxqTHVDmeU_fVF_87IBy5pWC554H8un5NnXeBIJ-0HviBHrn5JVtNb9jMAR2PgSB_yctkiUDd0WdMOMrWhfq2VbtwKJwXql_Gw8Tey8pwiWykGgH9o4eiuwTdgL4xJd3Rd0c0qx6eDV359Re4uL26nV6w7P4FZyGDLstLFZa5VKS2GWaJyLktjAbGDSgibSVVCgvYK3CkBKuV5VspEashFgWkWxh2vyUm9rt1bQlOnC620VB4uHYOI3NqyjPEqCo_5pyLypeek2bQwGSakF1qaVgLGl5J5CRgZkc-e18abEDLU5t1OABzKg1GZCQB42MEUKU8HlKj6dtjcS8t0ptcYj8AGoXo1Ih_3zb6nLyer3XrnaSSqEFLFEXnTCnf_2b1yREQNxL4n8IDcwxbU0wDM3enlu__u-Z485UFTOeP8lJxsH3buAwY922KEqr5QI_JkMpn9mOH928X1zfdRWELA6xz0KJjBI1g4Bgk |
link.rule.ids | 230,314,727,780,784,864,885,12056,21388,24318,27924,27925,31719,31720,33744,33745,43310,43805,53791,53793 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb9MwELage4AXBOJXYYCRkJCQrCX2xXZ4mca0qcBWIdRJe7MSxxlFVVqW9oH_nrvELQ0PvESKfHGc8_nus335zNg7HF-qrq0WMvMgoLZBlNIEYTB6h1JrD4p-Tr6c6skVfLnOruOCWxvTKrc-sXPU1dLTGvkREWtBl5R4vPol6NQo2l2NR2jcZQfEnJ6N2MGns-m371tfjOHdQtzLTK0-atFjp5S8hbNopVOhB9HoX5-8F5SGCZN7Eej8IXsQoSM_6fv6EbsTmsdscToTNx11NEJHfltU856DuuXzhkfS1JbTaitfhQW6BU4LeVj4E5X5kaNiOULA37wMfNNiDfgUotINX9Z8tSjwbq_K4yfs6vxsdjoR8QQF4SGHtcirkFSFNZX2CLRUHUKeJQqSALVSPtemghRHLMhgFJhMFnmlU22hUCVOtBB5PGWjZtmE54xnwZbWWG2IMB1hROF9VSV4VSWx_pkx-7DVpFv1RBmum2BY7Xq1O0omI7U7PWbvSdeOBhEq1BfxXwB8FdFRuRMAIOLBDCUPB5Jo_H5YvO0tFwdf6_6aypi93RXTk5RQ1oTlhmQ0milKJWP2rO_cXbOltrntPskMun0nQJTcw5Jm_qOj5gasFDH0i_836w27N5ldXriLz9OvL9l92dmjFFIestH6dhNeIc5Zl6-jMf8BPsv7bA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagSIgLouIVKMVISEhIbhLbsR0uqNqyKo9WPbRSb1biOLBom42a3QP_nhkn2W44cokUeZxE8_B8k0w-E_Ie4kvUtVGMZ04yWRvPSq4905C9famUkwJ_Tj47V6dX8tt1dr2z1Vdo2nfl4qhZ3hw1i1-ht7K9cfHYJxZfnM0k3AGQStxWdXyfPMgEONlYqPeLMOR1I4ePmKlRcQdLdYpdW1A-C5Uy3LmIKwMFd9ip7C4j_bsu7ySmadPkThaaPyGPB_hIj_vH3Cf3fPOULGeX7Gegjwb4SG-LatHzUHd00dCBOLWj-MaVtn4JSwPFl3kw-BsU-omCcinAwD-09HTTwRVgFiDTDV3VtF0WcLZzyc_PyNX8y-XslA27KDAnc7lmeeWTqjC6Ug7Alqi9z7NEyMTLWgiXK13JFKJWcq-F1Bkv8kqlyshClFBsAfp4TvaaVeNfEpp5UxptlEbSdIAShXNVlcBRlMj8pyPycdSkbXuyDBuKDKNsbwGLDWVoAasi8gF1bTGQQKGuGP4HgFshJZU9llIi-WAGkgcTSQgANx0erWWHAOws8rDJ0MMakXfbYZyJTWWNX21QRoEjgVQSkRe9cbePPTpHRPTE7FsBpOWejoC3BnruwTtf_ffMt-Thxcnc_vh6_v01ecSD03LG-QHZW99u_BtAQevyMPj7X081BJU |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CT-generated+radiographs+in+patients+with+pelvic+ring+injury%3A+can+they+be+used+in+lieu+of+plain+radiographs%3F&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+surgery+and+research&rft.au=Abdelfattah%2C+Adham+A&rft.au=Moed%2C+Berton+R&rft.date=2016-02-22&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1749-799X&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=26&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13018-016-0361-6&rft.externalDocID=A444014356 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |