Root resorption of self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets in severe anterior crowding Class I patients: a longitudinal retrospective study
To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" brack...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC oral health Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 115 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
01.10.2015
BioMed Central |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets.
Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment.
No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group.
There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Methods Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment. Result No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group. Conclusions There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects. Background To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Methods Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment. Result No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group. Conclusions There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects. Keywords: Self-ligating brackets, Conventional brackets, EARR To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment. No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group. There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects. To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets.BACKGROUNDTo test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets.Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment.METHODSPre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment.No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group.RESULTNo statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group.There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects.CONCLUSIONSThere was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects. To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment. No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group. There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects. |
ArticleNumber | 115 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Zhou, Yu Haq, Abdul Azeem Aminul Chen, Weiting |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Weiting surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Weiting – sequence: 2 givenname: Abdul Azeem Aminul surname: Haq fullname: Haq, Abdul Azeem Aminul – sequence: 3 givenname: Yu surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Yu |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26427531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kt1u1DAQhS1URH_gAbhBlrjhJsVOHCfhAqlaUahUCQnBteU4k8WL1w62s1WfhNdl0m2hrUBRFGvmnC-ZzDkmBz54IOQlZ6ect_Jt4mXHqoLxGm_GCvaEHHHRlIVsK35w73xIjlPaMMabVohn5LCUomzqih-RX19CyDRCCnHKNngaRprAjYWza52tX1PtB2qC34Ff-trRKYIeNnPKMNA-avMDcqLWo20HEVCfIdoQqYnhalgIK6dTohd0QiBS0juqqQt-bfOMfSRGyDGkCUy2O6AJy9fPydNRuwQvbp8n5Nv5h6-rT8Xl548Xq7PLwohO5KKWveh7UTHTm87gqR-N5JUpOYwdN0MlpehgEFjivBY1qw1IJjs5AMMpRHVC3u-509xvYTD4fVE7NUW71fFaBW3Vw46339U67JSoO1Y2HAFvbgEx_JwhZbW1yYBz2kOYk-INbzvWinqRvn4k3YQ54g9YVE3XylJ24q9qrR0o68eA7zULVJ3VgouqLm9Yp_9Q4TXA1uK6YLRYf2B4dX_QPxPeRQEFzV6Ae0spwqiMzXrZOZKtU5ypJXRqHzqFoVNL6BRDJ3_kvIP_3_Mb3IzcGg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_016_0320_y crossref_primary_10_2319_041117_247_1 crossref_primary_10_4103_jos_JOS_120_17 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjaa072 crossref_primary_10_4103_jos_jos_172_21 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11060864 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_022_02042_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58101342 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_1913 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_019_0743_3 crossref_primary_10_51847_YxGPFR62jS crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_017_2132_0 |
Cites_doi | 10.1177/154411130401500205 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70065-X 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90111-9 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80017-5 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.021 10.2319/080911-501.1 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90323-5 10.1093/ejo/10.1.30 10.2105/AJPH.76.5.556 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70069-2 10.1177/00220345820610062501 10.1093/ejo/23.1.35 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70129-6 10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997 10.1067/mod.2000.99136 10.1093/ejo/cjq178 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81678-6 10.1093/ejo/17.2.93 10.1002/sim.4780090617 10.1093/ejo/25.4.335 10.1002/cncr.26625 10.1093/ejo/5.3.173 10.1067/mod.2001.113409 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90317-7 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.030 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.032 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90266-6 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80016-3 10.1093/ejo/22.6.665 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70106-X |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd. Copyright BioMed Central 2015 Chen et al. 2015 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Copyright BioMed Central 2015 – notice: Chen et al. 2015 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QP 7X7 7XB 88E 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M1P M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1186/s12903-015-0100-0 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Database Proquest Central Journals Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student Proquest SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biological Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Dentistry |
EISSN | 1472-6831 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC4590271 4016224051 A541435251 26427531 10_1186_s12903_015_0100_0 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 34H 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACPRK ADBBV ADFRT ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EJD F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC IVC KQ8 LK8 M1P M48 M7P M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PMFND 3V. 7QP 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-56b4bb430cbc9cbb4bfc613c21ef91cd36649ed413c1154505ce60696de0ead43 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1472-6831 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 13:48:51 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:15:36 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:14:31 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:05:17 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:09:48 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:03:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:45:34 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:11 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c494t-56b4bb430cbc9cbb4bfc613c21ef91cd36649ed413c1154505ce60696de0ead43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12903-015-0100-0 |
PMID | 26427531 |
PQID | 1779862694 |
PQPubID | 42535 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4590271 proquest_miscellaneous_1718908451 proquest_journals_1779862694 gale_infotracmisc_A541435251 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A541435251 pubmed_primary_26427531 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12903_015_0100_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_015_0100_0 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-10-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2015 text: 2015-10-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC oral health |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Oral Health |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central |
References | GT Sameshima (100_CR7) 2001; 119 AD Mirabella (100_CR6) 1995; 17 F Weiland (100_CR19) 2003; 25 J Artun (100_CR12) 2005; 29 JK Hartsfield Jr (100_CR11) 2004; 15 WM McFadden (100_CR25) 1989; 96 AM Walker (100_CR32) 1986; 76 J Cohen (100_CR34) 1994; 47 RM Faltin (100_CR3) 2001; 23 D Mirabella (100_CR10) 1995; 108 SA Alexander (100_CR14) 1996; 110 I Smale (100_CR29) 2005; 128 L Linge (100_CR5) 1991; 99 EB Claus (100_CR24) 2012; 118 BW Beck (100_CR17) 1994; 105 FJ Anscombe (100_CR33) 1990; 9 B Weltman (100_CR8) 2010; 137 K Reitan (100_CR30) 1974; 44 V Leite (100_CR28) 2012; 82 GJ King (100_CR31) 1982; 61 P Scott (100_CR35) 2008; 134 GR Janson (100_CR13) 1999; 118 N Pandis (100_CR36) 2008; 134 J Andreasen (100_CR1) 1988 E Levander (100_CR9) 1988; 10 L Linge (100_CR18) 1988 S Baumrind (100_CR26) 1996; 110 N Brezniak (100_CR2) 1993; 103 BO Linge (100_CR4) 1983; 5 GR Janson (100_CR22) 1999; 118 DR Martins (100_CR27) 2012; 34 M Blake (100_CR20) 1995; 108 O Malmgren (100_CR21) 1982; 82 M Mavragani (100_CR15) 2000; 22 S Copeland (100_CR23) 1986; 89 B Mullenhauer (100_CR16) 1987; 92 16448232 - Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):919-26 8154460 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Apr;105(4):350-61 22492363 - Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4530-7 6961819 - Am J Orthod. 1982 Dec;82(6):487-91 3455795 - Am J Orthod. 1986 Jan;89(1):51-5 8422033 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Jan;103(1):62-6 3963285 - Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):556-8 18929262 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):470.e1-8 2218173 - Stat Med. 1990 Jun;9(6):703-8 7598108 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):76-84 21389075 - Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):170-5 18984396 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):646-51 12938838 - Eur J Orthod. 2003 Aug;25(4):335-42 3162877 - Eur J Orthod. 1988 Feb;10(1):30-8 6953114 - J Dent Res. 1982 Jun;61(6):775-9 2683733 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Nov;96(5):390-6 6578039 - Eur J Orthod. 1983 Aug;5(3):173-83 10982926 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Sep;118(3):262-73 8814033 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Sep;110(3):311-20 7781726 - Eur J Orthod. 1995 Apr;17(2):93-9 8814034 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Sep;110(3):321-4 15059946 - Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Jan 1;15(2):115-122 1986524 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jan;99(1):35-43 11296509 - Eur J Orthod. 2001 Feb;23(1):35-49 22409394 - Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1078-82 11343022 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May;119(5):505-10 11212602 - Eur J Orthod. 2000 Dec;22(6):665-74 7598104 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):48-55 20362905 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):462-76; discussion 12A 16027626 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jul;128(1):57-67 4520953 - Angle Orthod. 1974 Jan;44(1):68-82 |
References_xml | – volume: 15 start-page: 115 year: 2004 ident: 100_CR11 publication-title: Crit Rev Oral Biol Med doi: 10.1177/154411130401500205 – volume: 108 start-page: 48 year: 1995 ident: 100_CR10 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70065-X – volume: 89 start-page: 51 year: 1986 ident: 100_CR23 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90111-9 – volume: 110 start-page: 321 year: 1996 ident: 100_CR14 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80017-5 – volume: 137 start-page: 462 year: 2010 ident: 100_CR8 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.021 – start-page: 9 volume-title: Biological mechanisms of tooth eruption and root resorption year: 1988 ident: 100_CR1 – volume: 82 start-page: 1078 year: 2012 ident: 100_CR28 publication-title: Angle Orthod doi: 10.2319/080911-501.1 – volume: 96 start-page: 390 year: 1989 ident: 100_CR25 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90323-5 – volume: 10 start-page: 30 year: 1988 ident: 100_CR9 publication-title: Eur J Orthod doi: 10.1093/ejo/10.1.30 – volume: 76 start-page: 556 year: 1986 ident: 100_CR32 publication-title: Am J Public Health doi: 10.2105/AJPH.76.5.556 – volume: 108 start-page: 76 year: 1995 ident: 100_CR20 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70069-2 – volume: 61 start-page: 773 year: 1982 ident: 100_CR31 publication-title: J Dent Res doi: 10.1177/00220345820610062501 – volume: 134 start-page: 470.e1–8 year: 2008 ident: 100_CR35 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 23 start-page: 35 year: 2001 ident: 100_CR3 publication-title: Eur J Orthod doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.1.35 – volume: 105 start-page: 350 year: 1994 ident: 100_CR17 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70129-6 – volume: 47 start-page: 997 year: 1994 ident: 100_CR34 publication-title: Am Psychol doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997 – volume: 118 start-page: 262 year: 1999 ident: 100_CR13 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.99136 – volume: 34 start-page: 170 year: 2012 ident: 100_CR27 publication-title: Eur J Orthod doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq178 – volume: 99 start-page: 35 year: 1991 ident: 100_CR5 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81678-6 – volume: 17 start-page: 93 year: 1995 ident: 100_CR6 publication-title: Eur J Orthod doi: 10.1093/ejo/17.2.93 – volume: 29 start-page: 919 year: 2005 ident: 100_CR12 publication-title: Angle Orthod – volume: 9 start-page: 703 year: 1990 ident: 100_CR33 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090617 – start-page: 527 volume-title: The biological mechanisms of tooth eruption, resorption and replacement by implants year: 1988 ident: 100_CR18 – volume: 25 start-page: 335 year: 2003 ident: 100_CR19 publication-title: Eur J Orthod doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.4.335 – volume: 118 start-page: 4530 year: 2012 ident: 100_CR24 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.26625 – volume: 5 start-page: 173 year: 1983 ident: 100_CR4 publication-title: Eur J Orthod doi: 10.1093/ejo/5.3.173 – volume: 119 start-page: 505 year: 2001 ident: 100_CR7 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113409 – volume: 82 start-page: 487 year: 1982 ident: 100_CR21 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90317-7 – volume: 128 start-page: 57 year: 2005 ident: 100_CR29 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.030 – volume: 118 start-page: 262 year: 1999 ident: 100_CR22 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.99136 – volume: 134 start-page: 646 year: 2008 ident: 100_CR36 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.032 – volume: 44 start-page: 68 year: 1974 ident: 100_CR30 publication-title: Angle Orthod – volume: 92 start-page: 437 year: 1987 ident: 100_CR16 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90266-6 – volume: 110 start-page: 311 year: 1996 ident: 100_CR26 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80016-3 – volume: 22 start-page: 665 year: 2000 ident: 100_CR15 publication-title: Eur J Orthod doi: 10.1093/ejo/22.6.665 – volume: 103 start-page: 62 year: 1993 ident: 100_CR2 publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70106-X – reference: 7598104 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):48-55 – reference: 2218173 - Stat Med. 1990 Jun;9(6):703-8 – reference: 21389075 - Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):170-5 – reference: 18984396 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):646-51 – reference: 8814033 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Sep;110(3):311-20 – reference: 22492363 - Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4530-7 – reference: 18929262 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):470.e1-8 – reference: 8422033 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Jan;103(1):62-6 – reference: 8154460 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Apr;105(4):350-61 – reference: 6961819 - Am J Orthod. 1982 Dec;82(6):487-91 – reference: 8814034 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Sep;110(3):321-4 – reference: 3162877 - Eur J Orthod. 1988 Feb;10(1):30-8 – reference: 10982926 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Sep;118(3):262-73 – reference: 6578039 - Eur J Orthod. 1983 Aug;5(3):173-83 – reference: 16448232 - Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):919-26 – reference: 16027626 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jul;128(1):57-67 – reference: 22409394 - Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1078-82 – reference: 12938838 - Eur J Orthod. 2003 Aug;25(4):335-42 – reference: 6953114 - J Dent Res. 1982 Jun;61(6):775-9 – reference: 2683733 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Nov;96(5):390-6 – reference: 3455795 - Am J Orthod. 1986 Jan;89(1):51-5 – reference: 4520953 - Angle Orthod. 1974 Jan;44(1):68-82 – reference: 11212602 - Eur J Orthod. 2000 Dec;22(6):665-74 – reference: 11296509 - Eur J Orthod. 2001 Feb;23(1):35-49 – reference: 3963285 - Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):556-8 – reference: 7781726 - Eur J Orthod. 1995 Apr;17(2):93-9 – reference: 20362905 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):462-76; discussion 12A – reference: 1986524 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jan;99(1):35-43 – reference: 15059946 - Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Jan 1;15(2):115-122 – reference: 7598108 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):76-84 – reference: 11343022 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May;119(5):505-10 |
SSID | ssj0017844 |
Score | 2.1220856 |
Snippet | To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the... Background To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 115 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Alloys - chemistry Child Dental Alloys - chemistry Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Incisor - diagnostic imaging Longitudinal Studies Male Malocclusion, Angle Class I - therapy Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures - instrumentation Orthodontic Brackets - classification Orthodontic Wires Radiography, Dental - methods Retrospective Studies Root Resorption - diagnostic imaging Stainless Steel - chemistry Tooth Apex - diagnostic imaging Tooth Crown - diagnostic imaging Tooth Movement Techniques - instrumentation Tooth Root - diagnostic imaging |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA96gt6L6Pm1esoIgiCEa7rZtvFFDvU4hfNBPNi30ObjXFmavW0X_xT_XWey2br14d4KSdrszkxmJpn8foy9kd6LxlrFS1tKLgtneV37nIu6ysvaZvUssihcfCvOL-XX-WyeNty6VFa5WxPjQm2DoT3yE1GWiqJvJT-srjmxRtHpaqLQuM3uEHQZaXU5HxIuUVZSppNMURUnHe25UPUQlavRheqRL_p_Rd5zSeNyyT3_c_aA3U-BI5xuJf2Q3XLtEbv3iYp9iK_tiN29SMfkj9if7yH0gIl0WMcVAYKHzi09X0ZAjfYK6tbCfsE5rDB4tL82tPkJmECjbfcdLFochrruIP7_i7AG_CW_yd1BZNOEL5CAWbv3UMMyEPvRxhLTFn6-X4fdRU6IMLaP2eXZ5x8fz3liYOBGKtnzWdHIppHTzDRGGXxqvEH_b3LhvBLGTotCKmfRERqC9cFoyjjMiFRhXYazltMn7KANrXvGQImZbygeMXkjawwsifPYEE1S4VVupxOW7WShTYInJ5aMpY5pSlXorfg0ik-T-HQ2Ye-GIastNsdNnd-SgDXZLb7X1On6Ac6OELD0KfGhEzasmLDjUU-0NzNu3qmITvbe6X_aOWGvh2YaSTVsrQsb6iMqlVWSXvF0q1HDtDEszTFxxJZypGtDB0IBH7e0i58RDVwSAE8pnt88rRfsMCfFj2WIx-ygX2_cSwyn-uZVtJm_Bswh7Q priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Root resorption of self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets in severe anterior crowding Class I patients: a longitudinal retrospective study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26427531 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1779862694 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1718908451 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4590271 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fi9QwEB7uB6gvoqee1XOJIAhCtelmm0YQudM7TmEPWVxYfCltkupKac-2i_qX-O86k23XrRw--FIWkrTpzkxnJpl8H8ATkec8M0b50kjhi8gaP03z0OdpHMrUBOnEsShML6LzuXi_mCx2oKe36v7A5srUjvik5nXx_Me3n6_R4F85g4-jFw2tpVBVEJWh0UHpXdhHxySJ0GAq_mwqyFiIbmPzymEEDIzhOAbwfOCl_v5WbzmrYSHllmc6uwU3u5CSHa914Dbs2PIArr-lMiBicjuAa9NuA_0O_JpVVcswxa5q961gVc4aW-R-4aA2ys8sLQ3bLkVnlxhWmq8rWhZlmFqj1bcNW5Y4DK3AMieZZVUzfJPv5AiZ49lk71gH2dq8ZCkrKuJFWhni4MLHt3XVH_FkDuD2LszPTj--Ofc7bgZfCyVafxJlIsvEONCZVhp_ZbnGyECH3OaKazOOIqGsQRepCfAH4yxtMVdSkbEBzlqM78FeWZX2PjDFJ3lGkYoOM5FiyElsyJoIlKJchWbsQdDLItEdcDnxZxSJS2DiKFlLMkFJJiTJJPDg2WbI5Rq141-dn5KAE9IxvK9Ou4MJODvCxkqOiSmdUGO5B0eDnmiJetjcq0jSK3LCpVSUNSrhweNNM42k6rbSVivqw2MVxIJucbjWqM20e430QA50bdOB8MGHLeXyi8MJFwTNI_mD_x75EG6EZB6udvEI9tp6ZR9hDNZmI9iVCzmC_ZPTiw-zkVvJGDlrw-vs5NNv5oo2ew |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFD4aQ2J7QTBuhQFGAiEhRYtTN4mREJoYU8vWPaBN6ptJbAc6VUlpUk38Ev4Fv5FznAsND3vbWyVf6vb43Ozj7wN4LbKMp8ZILzKR8ERojZckWeDxJA6ixPjJyLEoTM_C8YX4MhvNtuBP-xaGyipbm-gMtSk0nZEf8CiSFH1L8XH50yPWKLpdbSk06m1xYn9dYcpWfpgcoXzfBMHx5_NPY69hFfC0kKLyRmEq0lQMfZ1qqfFTmmn0aTrgNpNcm2EYCmkNGndNUDUYIWiLUb4MjfXxbxdDnPcW3EbH61OyF826BI9HsRDNzSmPw4OSznioWonK4-gBd8_3_e8BNlxgvzxzw98d34O7TaDKDuuddR-2bL4HO0dUXET8cHtwZ9pcyz-A31-LomKYuBcrZ4FYkbHSLjJv4QA88u8syQ3bLHBnSwxWzeWaDlsZJuxoS6qSzXMchrplmZP3vFgx_CVX5F6ZY-9kE9YAwZbvWcIWBbEtrQ0xe-HXV6uifTjKHGzuQ7i4Edk8gu28yO0TYJKPspTiHx2kIsFAljiWNdEyhZkMzHAAfisLpRs4dGLlWCiXFsWhqsWnUHyKxKf8AbzrhixrLJDrOr8lASuyEzivTprnDrg6QtxSh8S_Tli0fAD7vZ6o37rf3G4R1diXUv3ThgG86pppJNXM5bZYUx8eSz8WNMXjekd1y8YwOMBEFVui3l7rOhDqeL8ln_9w6OOCAH8i_vT6Zb2EnfH59FSdTs5OnsFuQErgSiD3Ybtare1zDOWq9IXTHwbfblph_wLrOF-I |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Root+resorption+of+self-ligating+and+conventional+preadjusted+brackets+in+severe+anterior+crowding+Class+I+patients%3A+a+longitudinal+retrospective+study&rft.jtitle=BMC+oral+health&rft.au=Chen%2C+Weiting&rft.au=Haq%2C+Abdul+Azeem+Aminul&rft.au=Zhou%2C+Yu&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1472-6831&rft.volume=15&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12903-015-0100-0&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26427531&rft.externalDocID=PMC4590271 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6831&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6831&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6831&client=summon |