Root resorption of self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets in severe anterior crowding Class I patients: a longitudinal retrospective study

To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" brack...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC oral health Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 115
Main Authors Chen, Weiting, Haq, Abdul Azeem Aminul, Zhou, Yu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 01.10.2015
BioMed Central
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment. No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group. There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects.
AbstractList Background To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Methods Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment. Result No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group. Conclusions There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects.
Background To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Methods Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment. Result No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group. Conclusions There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects. Keywords: Self-ligating brackets, Conventional brackets, EARR
To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment. No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group. There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects.
To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets.BACKGROUNDTo test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets.Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment.METHODSPre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment.No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group.RESULTNo statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group.There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects.CONCLUSIONSThere was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects.
To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022" bracket and 35 with the 0.022" 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment. No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient's degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group. There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects.
ArticleNumber 115
Audience Academic
Author Zhou, Yu
Haq, Abdul Azeem Aminul
Chen, Weiting
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Weiting
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Weiting
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Abdul Azeem Aminul
  surname: Haq
  fullname: Haq, Abdul Azeem Aminul
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yu
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Yu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26427531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kt1u1DAQhS1URH_gAbhBlrjhJsVOHCfhAqlaUahUCQnBteU4k8WL1w62s1WfhNdl0m2hrUBRFGvmnC-ZzDkmBz54IOQlZ6ect_Jt4mXHqoLxGm_GCvaEHHHRlIVsK35w73xIjlPaMMabVohn5LCUomzqih-RX19CyDRCCnHKNngaRprAjYWza52tX1PtB2qC34Ff-trRKYIeNnPKMNA-avMDcqLWo20HEVCfIdoQqYnhalgIK6dTohd0QiBS0juqqQt-bfOMfSRGyDGkCUy2O6AJy9fPydNRuwQvbp8n5Nv5h6-rT8Xl548Xq7PLwohO5KKWveh7UTHTm87gqR-N5JUpOYwdN0MlpehgEFjivBY1qw1IJjs5AMMpRHVC3u-509xvYTD4fVE7NUW71fFaBW3Vw46339U67JSoO1Y2HAFvbgEx_JwhZbW1yYBz2kOYk-INbzvWinqRvn4k3YQ54g9YVE3XylJ24q9qrR0o68eA7zULVJ3VgouqLm9Yp_9Q4TXA1uK6YLRYf2B4dX_QPxPeRQEFzV6Ae0spwqiMzXrZOZKtU5ypJXRqHzqFoVNL6BRDJ3_kvIP_3_Mb3IzcGg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_016_0320_y
crossref_primary_10_2319_041117_247_1
crossref_primary_10_4103_jos_JOS_120_17
crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjaa072
crossref_primary_10_4103_jos_jos_172_21
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11060864
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_022_02042_3
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58101342
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_1913
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_019_0743_3
crossref_primary_10_51847_YxGPFR62jS
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_017_2132_0
Cites_doi 10.1177/154411130401500205
10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70065-X
10.1016/0002-9416(86)90111-9
10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80017-5
10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.021
10.2319/080911-501.1
10.1016/0889-5406(89)90323-5
10.1093/ejo/10.1.30
10.2105/AJPH.76.5.556
10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70069-2
10.1177/00220345820610062501
10.1093/ejo/23.1.35
10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70129-6
10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
10.1067/mod.2000.99136
10.1093/ejo/cjq178
10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81678-6
10.1093/ejo/17.2.93
10.1002/sim.4780090617
10.1093/ejo/25.4.335
10.1002/cncr.26625
10.1093/ejo/5.3.173
10.1067/mod.2001.113409
10.1016/0002-9416(82)90317-7
10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.030
10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.032
10.1016/0889-5406(87)90266-6
10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80016-3
10.1093/ejo/22.6.665
10.1016/0889-5406(93)70106-X
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright BioMed Central 2015
Chen et al. 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Copyright BioMed Central 2015
– notice: Chen et al. 2015
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7X7
7XB
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1186/s12903-015-0100-0
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Database
Proquest Central Journals
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
Proquest SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biological Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database ProQuest
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Dentistry
EISSN 1472-6831
ExternalDocumentID PMC4590271
4016224051
A541435251
26427531
10_1186_s12903_015_0100_0
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
34H
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADFRT
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
IVC
KQ8
LK8
M1P
M48
M7P
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PMFND
3V.
7QP
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-56b4bb430cbc9cbb4bfc613c21ef91cd36649ed413c1154505ce60696de0ead43
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1472-6831
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 13:48:51 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 10:15:36 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:14:31 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:05:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:09:48 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:03:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:45:34 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:11 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c494t-56b4bb430cbc9cbb4bfc613c21ef91cd36649ed413c1154505ce60696de0ead43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12903-015-0100-0
PMID 26427531
PQID 1779862694
PQPubID 42535
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4590271
proquest_miscellaneous_1718908451
proquest_journals_1779862694
gale_infotracmisc_A541435251
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A541435251
pubmed_primary_26427531
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12903_015_0100_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_015_0100_0
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC oral health
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Oral Health
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
References GT Sameshima (100_CR7) 2001; 119
AD Mirabella (100_CR6) 1995; 17
F Weiland (100_CR19) 2003; 25
J Artun (100_CR12) 2005; 29
JK Hartsfield Jr (100_CR11) 2004; 15
WM McFadden (100_CR25) 1989; 96
AM Walker (100_CR32) 1986; 76
J Cohen (100_CR34) 1994; 47
RM Faltin (100_CR3) 2001; 23
D Mirabella (100_CR10) 1995; 108
SA Alexander (100_CR14) 1996; 110
I Smale (100_CR29) 2005; 128
L Linge (100_CR5) 1991; 99
EB Claus (100_CR24) 2012; 118
BW Beck (100_CR17) 1994; 105
FJ Anscombe (100_CR33) 1990; 9
B Weltman (100_CR8) 2010; 137
K Reitan (100_CR30) 1974; 44
V Leite (100_CR28) 2012; 82
GJ King (100_CR31) 1982; 61
P Scott (100_CR35) 2008; 134
GR Janson (100_CR13) 1999; 118
N Pandis (100_CR36) 2008; 134
J Andreasen (100_CR1) 1988
E Levander (100_CR9) 1988; 10
L Linge (100_CR18) 1988
S Baumrind (100_CR26) 1996; 110
N Brezniak (100_CR2) 1993; 103
BO Linge (100_CR4) 1983; 5
GR Janson (100_CR22) 1999; 118
DR Martins (100_CR27) 2012; 34
M Blake (100_CR20) 1995; 108
O Malmgren (100_CR21) 1982; 82
M Mavragani (100_CR15) 2000; 22
S Copeland (100_CR23) 1986; 89
B Mullenhauer (100_CR16) 1987; 92
16448232 - Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):919-26
8154460 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Apr;105(4):350-61
22492363 - Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4530-7
6961819 - Am J Orthod. 1982 Dec;82(6):487-91
3455795 - Am J Orthod. 1986 Jan;89(1):51-5
8422033 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Jan;103(1):62-6
3963285 - Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):556-8
18929262 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):470.e1-8
2218173 - Stat Med. 1990 Jun;9(6):703-8
7598108 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):76-84
21389075 - Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):170-5
18984396 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):646-51
12938838 - Eur J Orthod. 2003 Aug;25(4):335-42
3162877 - Eur J Orthod. 1988 Feb;10(1):30-8
6953114 - J Dent Res. 1982 Jun;61(6):775-9
2683733 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Nov;96(5):390-6
6578039 - Eur J Orthod. 1983 Aug;5(3):173-83
10982926 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Sep;118(3):262-73
8814033 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Sep;110(3):311-20
7781726 - Eur J Orthod. 1995 Apr;17(2):93-9
8814034 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Sep;110(3):321-4
15059946 - Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Jan 1;15(2):115-122
1986524 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jan;99(1):35-43
11296509 - Eur J Orthod. 2001 Feb;23(1):35-49
22409394 - Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1078-82
11343022 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May;119(5):505-10
11212602 - Eur J Orthod. 2000 Dec;22(6):665-74
7598104 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):48-55
20362905 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):462-76; discussion 12A
16027626 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jul;128(1):57-67
4520953 - Angle Orthod. 1974 Jan;44(1):68-82
References_xml – volume: 15
  start-page: 115
  year: 2004
  ident: 100_CR11
  publication-title: Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
  doi: 10.1177/154411130401500205
– volume: 108
  start-page: 48
  year: 1995
  ident: 100_CR10
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70065-X
– volume: 89
  start-page: 51
  year: 1986
  ident: 100_CR23
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90111-9
– volume: 110
  start-page: 321
  year: 1996
  ident: 100_CR14
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80017-5
– volume: 137
  start-page: 462
  year: 2010
  ident: 100_CR8
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.021
– start-page: 9
  volume-title: Biological mechanisms of tooth eruption and root resorption
  year: 1988
  ident: 100_CR1
– volume: 82
  start-page: 1078
  year: 2012
  ident: 100_CR28
  publication-title: Angle Orthod
  doi: 10.2319/080911-501.1
– volume: 96
  start-page: 390
  year: 1989
  ident: 100_CR25
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90323-5
– volume: 10
  start-page: 30
  year: 1988
  ident: 100_CR9
  publication-title: Eur J Orthod
  doi: 10.1093/ejo/10.1.30
– volume: 76
  start-page: 556
  year: 1986
  ident: 100_CR32
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.76.5.556
– volume: 108
  start-page: 76
  year: 1995
  ident: 100_CR20
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70069-2
– volume: 61
  start-page: 773
  year: 1982
  ident: 100_CR31
  publication-title: J Dent Res
  doi: 10.1177/00220345820610062501
– volume: 134
  start-page: 470.e1–8
  year: 2008
  ident: 100_CR35
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
– volume: 23
  start-page: 35
  year: 2001
  ident: 100_CR3
  publication-title: Eur J Orthod
  doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.1.35
– volume: 105
  start-page: 350
  year: 1994
  ident: 100_CR17
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70129-6
– volume: 47
  start-page: 997
  year: 1994
  ident: 100_CR34
  publication-title: Am Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
– volume: 118
  start-page: 262
  year: 1999
  ident: 100_CR13
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.99136
– volume: 34
  start-page: 170
  year: 2012
  ident: 100_CR27
  publication-title: Eur J Orthod
  doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq178
– volume: 99
  start-page: 35
  year: 1991
  ident: 100_CR5
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81678-6
– volume: 17
  start-page: 93
  year: 1995
  ident: 100_CR6
  publication-title: Eur J Orthod
  doi: 10.1093/ejo/17.2.93
– volume: 29
  start-page: 919
  year: 2005
  ident: 100_CR12
  publication-title: Angle Orthod
– volume: 9
  start-page: 703
  year: 1990
  ident: 100_CR33
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090617
– start-page: 527
  volume-title: The biological mechanisms of tooth eruption, resorption and replacement by implants
  year: 1988
  ident: 100_CR18
– volume: 25
  start-page: 335
  year: 2003
  ident: 100_CR19
  publication-title: Eur J Orthod
  doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.4.335
– volume: 118
  start-page: 4530
  year: 2012
  ident: 100_CR24
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.26625
– volume: 5
  start-page: 173
  year: 1983
  ident: 100_CR4
  publication-title: Eur J Orthod
  doi: 10.1093/ejo/5.3.173
– volume: 119
  start-page: 505
  year: 2001
  ident: 100_CR7
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113409
– volume: 82
  start-page: 487
  year: 1982
  ident: 100_CR21
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90317-7
– volume: 128
  start-page: 57
  year: 2005
  ident: 100_CR29
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.030
– volume: 118
  start-page: 262
  year: 1999
  ident: 100_CR22
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.99136
– volume: 134
  start-page: 646
  year: 2008
  ident: 100_CR36
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.032
– volume: 44
  start-page: 68
  year: 1974
  ident: 100_CR30
  publication-title: Angle Orthod
– volume: 92
  start-page: 437
  year: 1987
  ident: 100_CR16
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90266-6
– volume: 110
  start-page: 311
  year: 1996
  ident: 100_CR26
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80016-3
– volume: 22
  start-page: 665
  year: 2000
  ident: 100_CR15
  publication-title: Eur J Orthod
  doi: 10.1093/ejo/22.6.665
– volume: 103
  start-page: 62
  year: 1993
  ident: 100_CR2
  publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70106-X
– reference: 7598104 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):48-55
– reference: 2218173 - Stat Med. 1990 Jun;9(6):703-8
– reference: 21389075 - Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):170-5
– reference: 18984396 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):646-51
– reference: 8814033 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Sep;110(3):311-20
– reference: 22492363 - Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4530-7
– reference: 18929262 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):470.e1-8
– reference: 8422033 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Jan;103(1):62-6
– reference: 8154460 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Apr;105(4):350-61
– reference: 6961819 - Am J Orthod. 1982 Dec;82(6):487-91
– reference: 8814034 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Sep;110(3):321-4
– reference: 3162877 - Eur J Orthod. 1988 Feb;10(1):30-8
– reference: 10982926 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Sep;118(3):262-73
– reference: 6578039 - Eur J Orthod. 1983 Aug;5(3):173-83
– reference: 16448232 - Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):919-26
– reference: 16027626 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jul;128(1):57-67
– reference: 22409394 - Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1078-82
– reference: 12938838 - Eur J Orthod. 2003 Aug;25(4):335-42
– reference: 6953114 - J Dent Res. 1982 Jun;61(6):775-9
– reference: 2683733 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Nov;96(5):390-6
– reference: 3455795 - Am J Orthod. 1986 Jan;89(1):51-5
– reference: 4520953 - Angle Orthod. 1974 Jan;44(1):68-82
– reference: 11212602 - Eur J Orthod. 2000 Dec;22(6):665-74
– reference: 11296509 - Eur J Orthod. 2001 Feb;23(1):35-49
– reference: 3963285 - Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):556-8
– reference: 7781726 - Eur J Orthod. 1995 Apr;17(2):93-9
– reference: 20362905 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):462-76; discussion 12A
– reference: 1986524 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jan;99(1):35-43
– reference: 15059946 - Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Jan 1;15(2):115-122
– reference: 7598108 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):76-84
– reference: 11343022 - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May;119(5):505-10
SSID ssj0017844
Score 2.1220856
Snippet To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the...
Background To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 115
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Alloys - chemistry
Child
Dental Alloys - chemistry
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incisor - diagnostic imaging
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Malocclusion, Angle Class I - therapy
Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures - instrumentation
Orthodontic Brackets - classification
Orthodontic Wires
Radiography, Dental - methods
Retrospective Studies
Root Resorption - diagnostic imaging
Stainless Steel - chemistry
Tooth Apex - diagnostic imaging
Tooth Crown - diagnostic imaging
Tooth Movement Techniques - instrumentation
Tooth Root - diagnostic imaging
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA96gt6L6Pm1esoIgiCEa7rZtvFFDvU4hfNBPNi30ObjXFmavW0X_xT_XWey2br14d4KSdrszkxmJpn8foy9kd6LxlrFS1tKLgtneV37nIu6ysvaZvUssihcfCvOL-XX-WyeNty6VFa5WxPjQm2DoT3yE1GWiqJvJT-srjmxRtHpaqLQuM3uEHQZaXU5HxIuUVZSppNMURUnHe25UPUQlavRheqRL_p_Rd5zSeNyyT3_c_aA3U-BI5xuJf2Q3XLtEbv3iYp9iK_tiN29SMfkj9if7yH0gIl0WMcVAYKHzi09X0ZAjfYK6tbCfsE5rDB4tL82tPkJmECjbfcdLFochrruIP7_i7AG_CW_yd1BZNOEL5CAWbv3UMMyEPvRxhLTFn6-X4fdRU6IMLaP2eXZ5x8fz3liYOBGKtnzWdHIppHTzDRGGXxqvEH_b3LhvBLGTotCKmfRERqC9cFoyjjMiFRhXYazltMn7KANrXvGQImZbygeMXkjawwsifPYEE1S4VVupxOW7WShTYInJ5aMpY5pSlXorfg0ik-T-HQ2Ye-GIastNsdNnd-SgDXZLb7X1On6Ac6OELD0KfGhEzasmLDjUU-0NzNu3qmITvbe6X_aOWGvh2YaSTVsrQsb6iMqlVWSXvF0q1HDtDEszTFxxJZypGtDB0IBH7e0i58RDVwSAE8pnt88rRfsMCfFj2WIx-ygX2_cSwyn-uZVtJm_Bswh7Q
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Root resorption of self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets in severe anterior crowding Class I patients: a longitudinal retrospective study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26427531
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1779862694
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1718908451
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4590271
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fi9QwEB7uB6gvoqee1XOJIAhCtelmm0YQudM7TmEPWVxYfCltkupKac-2i_qX-O86k23XrRw--FIWkrTpzkxnJpl8H8ATkec8M0b50kjhi8gaP03z0OdpHMrUBOnEsShML6LzuXi_mCx2oKe36v7A5srUjvik5nXx_Me3n6_R4F85g4-jFw2tpVBVEJWh0UHpXdhHxySJ0GAq_mwqyFiIbmPzymEEDIzhOAbwfOCl_v5WbzmrYSHllmc6uwU3u5CSHa914Dbs2PIArr-lMiBicjuAa9NuA_0O_JpVVcswxa5q961gVc4aW-R-4aA2ys8sLQ3bLkVnlxhWmq8rWhZlmFqj1bcNW5Y4DK3AMieZZVUzfJPv5AiZ49lk71gH2dq8ZCkrKuJFWhni4MLHt3XVH_FkDuD2LszPTj--Ofc7bgZfCyVafxJlIsvEONCZVhp_ZbnGyECH3OaKazOOIqGsQRepCfAH4yxtMVdSkbEBzlqM78FeWZX2PjDFJ3lGkYoOM5FiyElsyJoIlKJchWbsQdDLItEdcDnxZxSJS2DiKFlLMkFJJiTJJPDg2WbI5Rq141-dn5KAE9IxvK9Ou4MJODvCxkqOiSmdUGO5B0eDnmiJetjcq0jSK3LCpVSUNSrhweNNM42k6rbSVivqw2MVxIJucbjWqM20e430QA50bdOB8MGHLeXyi8MJFwTNI_mD_x75EG6EZB6udvEI9tp6ZR9hDNZmI9iVCzmC_ZPTiw-zkVvJGDlrw-vs5NNv5oo2ew
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFD4aQ2J7QTBuhQFGAiEhRYtTN4mREJoYU8vWPaBN6ptJbAc6VUlpUk38Ev4Fv5FznAsND3vbWyVf6vb43Ozj7wN4LbKMp8ZILzKR8ERojZckWeDxJA6ixPjJyLEoTM_C8YX4MhvNtuBP-xaGyipbm-gMtSk0nZEf8CiSFH1L8XH50yPWKLpdbSk06m1xYn9dYcpWfpgcoXzfBMHx5_NPY69hFfC0kKLyRmEq0lQMfZ1qqfFTmmn0aTrgNpNcm2EYCmkNGndNUDUYIWiLUb4MjfXxbxdDnPcW3EbH61OyF826BI9HsRDNzSmPw4OSznioWonK4-gBd8_3_e8BNlxgvzxzw98d34O7TaDKDuuddR-2bL4HO0dUXET8cHtwZ9pcyz-A31-LomKYuBcrZ4FYkbHSLjJv4QA88u8syQ3bLHBnSwxWzeWaDlsZJuxoS6qSzXMchrplmZP3vFgx_CVX5F6ZY-9kE9YAwZbvWcIWBbEtrQ0xe-HXV6uifTjKHGzuQ7i4Edk8gu28yO0TYJKPspTiHx2kIsFAljiWNdEyhZkMzHAAfisLpRs4dGLlWCiXFsWhqsWnUHyKxKf8AbzrhixrLJDrOr8lASuyEzivTprnDrg6QtxSh8S_Tli0fAD7vZ6o37rf3G4R1diXUv3ThgG86pppJNXM5bZYUx8eSz8WNMXjekd1y8YwOMBEFVui3l7rOhDqeL8ln_9w6OOCAH8i_vT6Zb2EnfH59FSdTs5OnsFuQErgSiD3Ybtare1zDOWq9IXTHwbfblph_wLrOF-I
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Root+resorption+of+self-ligating+and+conventional+preadjusted+brackets+in+severe+anterior+crowding+Class+I+patients%3A+a+longitudinal+retrospective+study&rft.jtitle=BMC+oral+health&rft.au=Chen%2C+Weiting&rft.au=Haq%2C+Abdul+Azeem+Aminul&rft.au=Zhou%2C+Yu&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1472-6831&rft.volume=15&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12903-015-0100-0&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26427531&rft.externalDocID=PMC4590271
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6831&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6831&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6831&client=summon