Comparison of oncological outcomes for open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: results from the Canadian Upper Tract Collaboration

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, over the past decade laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) has emerged as a minimally in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBJU international Vol. 112; no. 6; pp. 791 - 797
Main Authors Fairey, Adrian S., Kassouf, Wassim, Estey, Eric, Tanguay, Simon, Rendon, Ricardo, Bell, David, Izawa, Jonathan, Chin, Joseph, Kapoor, Anil, Matsumoto, Edward, Black, Peter, So, Alan, Lattouf, Jean‐Baptiste, Saad, Fred, Drachenberg, Darrel, Cagiannos, Ilias, Lacombe, Louis, Fradet, Yves, Jacobsen, Niels‐Erik B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Wiley-Blackwell 01.10.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, over the past decade laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical alternative. Data comparing the oncological efficacy of ORNU and LRNU have reported mixed results and the equivalence of these surgical techniques have not yet been established. We found that surgical approach was not independently associated with overall or disease‐specific survival; however, there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer recurrence‐free survival (RFS). To our knowledge, this is the first large, multi‐institutional analysis to show a trend toward inferior RFS in patients with UTUC treated with LRNU. Objective To examine the association between surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and clinical outcomes in a large, multi‐institutional cohort, as there are limited data comparing the oncological efficacy of open RNU (ORNU) and laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and Methods Institutional RNU databases containing detailed information on patients with UTUC treated between 1994 and 2009 were obtained from 10 academic centres in Canada. Data were collected on 1029 patients and combined into a relational database formatted with patient characteristics, pathological characteristics, and survival status. Surgical approach was classified as ORNU (n = 403) or LRNU (n = 446). The clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease‐specific survival (DSS), and recurrence‐free survival (RFS). The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional regression analysis were used to analyse survival data. Results Data were evaluable for 849 of 1029 (82.5%) patients. The median (interquartile range) follow‐up duration was 2.2 (0.6–5.0) years. The predicted 5‐year OS (67% vs 68%, log‐rank P = 0.19) and DSS (73% vs 76%, log‐rank P = 0.32) rates did not differ between the ORNU and LRNU groups; however, there was a trend toward an improved predicted 5‐year RFS rate in the ORNU group (43% vs 33%, log‐rank P = 0.06). Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed that surgical approach was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–1.27, P = 0.52) or DSS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60–1.37, P = 0.64); however, there was a trend toward an independent association between surgical approach and RFS (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98–1.57, P = 0.08). Conclusion Surgical approach was not independently associated with OS or DSS but there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer RFS. Further prospective evaluation is needed.
AbstractList What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, over the past decade laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical alternative. Data comparing the oncological efficacy of ORNU and LRNU have reported mixed results and the equivalence of these surgical techniques have not yet been established. We found that surgical approach was not independently associated with overall or disease-specific survival; however, there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS). To our knowledge, this is the first large, multi-institutional analysis to show a trend toward inferior RFS in patients with UTUC treated with LRNU. Objective To examine the association between surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and clinical outcomes in a large, multi-institutional cohort, as there are limited data comparing the oncological efficacy of open RNU (ORNU) and laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and Methods Institutional RNU databases containing detailed information on patients with UTUC treated between 1994 and 2009 were obtained from 10 academic centres in Canada. Data were collected on 1029 patients and combined into a relational database formatted with patient characteristics, pathological characteristics, and survival status. Surgical approach was classified as ORNU (n = 403) or LRNU (n = 446). The clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression analysis were used to analyse survival data. Results Data were evaluable for 849 of 1029 (82.5%) patients. The median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 2.2 (0.6-5.0) years. The predicted 5-year OS (67% vs 68%, log-rank P = 0.19) and DSS (73% vs 76%, log-rank P = 0.32) rates did not differ between the ORNU and LRNU groups; however, there was a trend toward an improved predicted 5-year RFS rate in the ORNU group (43% vs 33%, log-rank P = 0.06). Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed that surgical approach was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.27, P = 0.52) or DSS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60-1.37, P = 0.64); however, there was a trend toward an independent association between surgical approach and RFS (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98-1.57, P = 0.08). Conclusion Surgical approach was not independently associated with OS or DSS but there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer RFS. Further prospective evaluation is needed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, over the past decade laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical alternative. Data comparing the oncological efficacy of ORNU and LRNU have reported mixed results and the equivalence of these surgical techniques have not yet been established. We found that surgical approach was not independently associated with overall or disease‐specific survival; however, there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer recurrence‐free survival (RFS). To our knowledge, this is the first large, multi‐institutional analysis to show a trend toward inferior RFS in patients with UTUC treated with LRNU. Objective To examine the association between surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and clinical outcomes in a large, multi‐institutional cohort, as there are limited data comparing the oncological efficacy of open RNU (ORNU) and laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and Methods Institutional RNU databases containing detailed information on patients with UTUC treated between 1994 and 2009 were obtained from 10 academic centres in Canada. Data were collected on 1029 patients and combined into a relational database formatted with patient characteristics, pathological characteristics, and survival status. Surgical approach was classified as ORNU (n = 403) or LRNU (n = 446). The clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease‐specific survival (DSS), and recurrence‐free survival (RFS). The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional regression analysis were used to analyse survival data. Results Data were evaluable for 849 of 1029 (82.5%) patients. The median (interquartile range) follow‐up duration was 2.2 (0.6–5.0) years. The predicted 5‐year OS (67% vs 68%, log‐rank P = 0.19) and DSS (73% vs 76%, log‐rank P = 0.32) rates did not differ between the ORNU and LRNU groups; however, there was a trend toward an improved predicted 5‐year RFS rate in the ORNU group (43% vs 33%, log‐rank P = 0.06). Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed that surgical approach was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–1.27, P = 0.52) or DSS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60–1.37, P = 0.64); however, there was a trend toward an independent association between surgical approach and RFS (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98–1.57, P = 0.08). Conclusion Surgical approach was not independently associated with OS or DSS but there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer RFS. Further prospective evaluation is needed.
WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, over the past decade laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical alternative. Data comparing the oncological efficacy of ORNU and LRNU have reported mixed results and the equivalence of these surgical techniques have not yet been established. We found that surgical approach was not independently associated with overall or disease-specific survival; however, there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS). To our knowledge, this is the first large, multi-institutional analysis to show a trend toward inferior RFS in patients with UTUC treated with LRNU. To examine the association between surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and clinical outcomes in a large, multi-institutional cohort, as there are limited data comparing the oncological efficacy of open RNU (ORNU) and laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Institutional RNU databases containing detailed information on patients with UTUC treated between 1994 and 2009 were obtained from 10 academic centres in Canada. Data were collected on 1029 patients and combined into a relational database formatted with patient characteristics, pathological characteristics, and survival status. Surgical approach was classified as ORNU (n = 403) or LRNU (n = 446). The clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression analysis were used to analyse survival data. Data were evaluable for 849 of 1029 (82.5%) patients. The median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 2.2 (0.6-5.0) years. The predicted 5-year OS (67% vs 68%, log-rank P = 0.19) and DSS (73% vs 76%, log-rank P = 0.32) rates did not differ between the ORNU and LRNU groups; however, there was a trend toward an improved predicted 5-year RFS rate in the ORNU group (43% vs 33%, log-rank P = 0.06). Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed that surgical approach was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.27, P = 0.52) or DSS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60-1.37, P = 0.64); however, there was a trend toward an independent association between surgical approach and RFS (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98-1.57, P = 0.08). Surgical approach was not independently associated with OS or DSS but there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer RFS. Further prospective evaluation is needed.
WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, over the past decade laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical alternative. Data comparing the oncological efficacy of ORNU and LRNU have reported mixed results and the equivalence of these surgical techniques have not yet been established. We found that surgical approach was not independently associated with overall or disease-specific survival; however, there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS). To our knowledge, this is the first large, multi-institutional analysis to show a trend toward inferior RFS in patients with UTUC treated with LRNU.UNLABELLEDWHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, over the past decade laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical alternative. Data comparing the oncological efficacy of ORNU and LRNU have reported mixed results and the equivalence of these surgical techniques have not yet been established. We found that surgical approach was not independently associated with overall or disease-specific survival; however, there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS). To our knowledge, this is the first large, multi-institutional analysis to show a trend toward inferior RFS in patients with UTUC treated with LRNU.To examine the association between surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and clinical outcomes in a large, multi-institutional cohort, as there are limited data comparing the oncological efficacy of open RNU (ORNU) and laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).OBJECTIVETo examine the association between surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and clinical outcomes in a large, multi-institutional cohort, as there are limited data comparing the oncological efficacy of open RNU (ORNU) and laparoscopic RNU (LRNU) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).Institutional RNU databases containing detailed information on patients with UTUC treated between 1994 and 2009 were obtained from 10 academic centres in Canada. Data were collected on 1029 patients and combined into a relational database formatted with patient characteristics, pathological characteristics, and survival status. Surgical approach was classified as ORNU (n = 403) or LRNU (n = 446). The clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression analysis were used to analyse survival data.PATIENTS AND METHODSInstitutional RNU databases containing detailed information on patients with UTUC treated between 1994 and 2009 were obtained from 10 academic centres in Canada. Data were collected on 1029 patients and combined into a relational database formatted with patient characteristics, pathological characteristics, and survival status. Surgical approach was classified as ORNU (n = 403) or LRNU (n = 446). The clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression analysis were used to analyse survival data.Data were evaluable for 849 of 1029 (82.5%) patients. The median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 2.2 (0.6-5.0) years. The predicted 5-year OS (67% vs 68%, log-rank P = 0.19) and DSS (73% vs 76%, log-rank P = 0.32) rates did not differ between the ORNU and LRNU groups; however, there was a trend toward an improved predicted 5-year RFS rate in the ORNU group (43% vs 33%, log-rank P = 0.06). Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed that surgical approach was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.27, P = 0.52) or DSS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60-1.37, P = 0.64); however, there was a trend toward an independent association between surgical approach and RFS (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98-1.57, P = 0.08).RESULTSData were evaluable for 849 of 1029 (82.5%) patients. The median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 2.2 (0.6-5.0) years. The predicted 5-year OS (67% vs 68%, log-rank P = 0.19) and DSS (73% vs 76%, log-rank P = 0.32) rates did not differ between the ORNU and LRNU groups; however, there was a trend toward an improved predicted 5-year RFS rate in the ORNU group (43% vs 33%, log-rank P = 0.06). Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed that surgical approach was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.27, P = 0.52) or DSS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60-1.37, P = 0.64); however, there was a trend toward an independent association between surgical approach and RFS (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98-1.57, P = 0.08).Surgical approach was not independently associated with OS or DSS but there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer RFS. Further prospective evaluation is needed.CONCLUSIONSurgical approach was not independently associated with OS or DSS but there was a trend toward an independent association between LRNU and poorer RFS. Further prospective evaluation is needed.
Author Lacombe, Louis
So, Alan
Saad, Fred
Drachenberg, Darrel
Rendon, Ricardo
Chin, Joseph
Black, Peter
Matsumoto, Edward
Estey, Eric
Lattouf, Jean‐Baptiste
Izawa, Jonathan
Fairey, Adrian S.
Kassouf, Wassim
Tanguay, Simon
Cagiannos, Ilias
Bell, David
Fradet, Yves
Kapoor, Anil
Jacobsen, Niels‐Erik B.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Adrian S.
  surname: Fairey
  fullname: Fairey, Adrian S.
  organization: University of Alberta
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Wassim
  surname: Kassouf
  fullname: Kassouf, Wassim
  organization: McGill University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Eric
  surname: Estey
  fullname: Estey, Eric
  organization: University of Alberta
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Simon
  surname: Tanguay
  fullname: Tanguay, Simon
  organization: McGill University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ricardo
  surname: Rendon
  fullname: Rendon, Ricardo
  organization: Dalhousie University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: David
  surname: Bell
  fullname: Bell, David
  organization: Dalhousie University
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Jonathan
  surname: Izawa
  fullname: Izawa, Jonathan
  organization: University of Western Ontario
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Joseph
  surname: Chin
  fullname: Chin, Joseph
  organization: University of Western Ontario
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Anil
  surname: Kapoor
  fullname: Kapoor, Anil
  organization: McMaster University
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Edward
  surname: Matsumoto
  fullname: Matsumoto, Edward
  organization: McMaster University
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Peter
  surname: Black
  fullname: Black, Peter
  organization: University of British Columbia
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Alan
  surname: So
  fullname: So, Alan
  organization: University of British Columbia
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Jean‐Baptiste
  surname: Lattouf
  fullname: Lattouf, Jean‐Baptiste
  organization: University of Montreal
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Fred
  surname: Saad
  fullname: Saad, Fred
  organization: University of Montreal
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Darrel
  surname: Drachenberg
  fullname: Drachenberg, Darrel
  organization: University of Manitoba
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Ilias
  surname: Cagiannos
  fullname: Cagiannos, Ilias
  organization: University of Ottawa
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Louis
  surname: Lacombe
  fullname: Lacombe, Louis
  organization: Laval University
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Yves
  surname: Fradet
  fullname: Fradet, Yves
  organization: Laval University
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Niels‐Erik B.
  surname: Jacobsen
  fullname: Jacobsen, Niels‐Erik B.
  organization: University of Alberta
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27746110$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqVkd2K1TAUhYOMOD_6ChIQwZtzTNq0ab0QtPjLgDdzwLuQprtODm12TVKc8w4-tGnnzAhzpblJ2PnWzs5a5-TEoQNCKGdbntbr_ZaLUmwEZ9-3GeNZqgoptjePyNn9xcndmdXlKTkPYc9YKpTFE3Ka5VxUkmdn5HeD46S9Dego9hSdwQF_WKMHinM0OEKgPXqKEziqXUcHnXAMBidrqNfdijqYrj3OHiJ4MBHHwxvqIcxDTGqPI43XQBvtEq4d3U0TeHrltYm0wWHQLXodLbqn5HGvhwDPjvsF2X38cNV83lx--_SleXe5MaIWYsMLIaEXfVVAJcu-6oGJHNq8y7uyrouW6VYYLkFCxoq61qWss7bmkFRVCz3LL8ir276Tx58zhKhGGwykSRzgHBQXeVbyMhM8oS8eoPv0T5emWykmK8aLRD0_UnM7Qqcmb0ftD-rO5wS8PAI6JMN6r52x4S8npSg5XyarbjmTPA4e-nuEM7VEr_ZqSVUtCaslerVGr26S9O0DqbFxtTV6bYf_aPDLDnD454fV-6-79Zj_AZg8ybs
CODEN BJINFO
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2016_07_036
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_723669
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2017_0662
crossref_primary_10_4143_crt_2017_417
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000011954
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_10708
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_25877
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2014_07_008
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_0496
crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2020_1032
crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2015_56_2_375
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_025_13773_1
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_13221_z
crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2016_4541
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_021_02236_z
crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_13463
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2020_02_020
crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcp_14639
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_018_1248_9
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1115830
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_13611
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2021_729686
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00120_015_3882_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_017_2026_4
crossref_primary_10_1080_21681805_2019_1710562
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_015_1712_3
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_2063
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2017_10_003
crossref_primary_10_1159_000364833
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_13694
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_013_1160_x
crossref_primary_10_4081_aiua_2022_1_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2017_07_028
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_018_6557_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_016_0202_x
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.003
10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.042
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06665.x
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.072
10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.021
10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.007
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.013
10.1097/00000478-199812000-00001
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09826.x
10.3322/caac.20138
10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4
10.1245/s10434-011-1841-x
10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.005
10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02420.x
10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.005
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07950.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2012 BJU International
2014 INIST-CNRS
2012 BJU International.
BJUI © 2013 BJU International
Copyright_xml – notice: 2012 BJU International
– notice: 2014 INIST-CNRS
– notice: 2012 BJU International.
– notice: BJUI © 2013 BJU International
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7X8
DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11474.x
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1464-410X
EndPage 797
ExternalDocumentID 3070519731
23148712
27746110
10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11474_x
BJU11474
Genre article
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations Canada
North America
America
Ontario
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Ontario
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.55
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
23N
24P
2WC
31~
33P
36B
3O-
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6P2
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DIK
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
J5H
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
X7M
XG1
YFH
ZGI
ZXP
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGYGG
CITATION
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4944-1547ef4f85e876f8fe043eb3d3d6995b0ab4c17e7e20599a6792b91e47e8bef03
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1464-4096
1464-410X
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 00:10:50 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 14 07:46:38 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:53:48 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:16:05 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:50:00 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:19 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:21:58 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Endoscopic surgery
Urothelial cancer
Nephrology
Urinary system disease
Prognosis
Nephroureterectomy
Urinary tract disease
Malignant tumor
Urinary tract
Survival
Urology
Canadian Upper Tract Collaboration
Treatment
Urinary system
radical nephroureterectomy
Upper urinary tract
Comparative study
Cancer
Urothelium
upper urinary tract urothelial cancer
survival
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
2012 BJU International.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4944-1547ef4f85e876f8fe043eb3d3d6995b0ab4c17e7e20599a6792b91e47e8bef03
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMID 23148712
PQID 1432078015
PQPubID 1026371
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1432616241
proquest_journals_1432078015
pubmed_primary_23148712
pascalfrancis_primary_27746110
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11474_x
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11474_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11474_x_BJU11474
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2013
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2013
  text: October 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Oxford
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford
– name: England
– name: Edgecliff
PublicationTitle BJU international
PublicationTitleAlternate BJU Int
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley-Blackwell
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2009; 56
2009; 55
2010; 58
2011
2010; 108
2012; 19
2005; 65
2011; 59
2002
2007; 99
2009; 103
2007; 69
2009; 59
1998; 22
2012; 62
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
Greene FL (e_1_2_7_17_1) 2002
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
Siegal R (e_1_2_7_2_1) 2012; 62
References_xml – year: 2011
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1397
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1409
  article-title: Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: a multicenter analysis in Japan
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1435
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1448
  article-title: The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee
  publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol
– volume: 59
  start-page: 584
  year: 2011
  end-page: 594
  article-title: European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas: 2011 update
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 69
  start-page: 656
  year: 2007
  end-page: 661
  article-title: Oncologic control after open or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: a single center experience
  publication-title: Urology
– year: 2002
– volume: 69
  start-page: 457
  year: 2007
  end-page: 461
  article-title: Comparative study of oncologic outcome of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and standard nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1037
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1063
  article-title: Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 108
  start-page: 406
  year: 2010
  end-page: 412
  article-title: Oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy: results from an international cohort
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 62
  start-page: 10
  year: 2012
  end-page: 29
  article-title: Cancer statistics, 2012
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
– volume: 99
  start-page: 632
  year: 2007
  end-page: 636
  article-title: Survival analysis in patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: a comparison between open and hand‐assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 58
  start-page: 645
  year: 2010
  end-page: 651
  article-title: Comparison between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in a contemporary group of patients: are recurrence and disease‐specific survival associated with surgical technique?
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 301
  year: 2012
  end-page: 308
  article-title: Assessment of oncologic control obtained after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT‐UCs): results from a large French multicenter collaborative study
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
– volume: 59
  start-page: 642
  year: 2009
  end-page: 649
  article-title: Primary urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract: important clinicopathological factors predicting bladder recurrence after surgical resection
  publication-title: Pathol Int
– volume: 103
  start-page: 66
  year: 2009
  end-page: 70
  article-title: The oncological results of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell cancer are equal to those of open nephroureterectomy
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 56
  start-page: 520
  year: 2009
  end-page: 526
  article-title: Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy: perioperative and oncologic outcomes from a randomized prospective study
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Comparison of oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a multi‐institutional analysis of 1249 cases
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 65
  start-page: 279
  year: 2005
  end-page: 283
  article-title: Risk factors for subsequent development of bladder cancer after primary transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract
  publication-title: Urology
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.003
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.042
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06665.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.072
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.021
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.007
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.013
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1097/00000478-199812000-00001
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09826.x
– volume: 62
  start-page: 10
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  article-title: Cancer statistics, 2012
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.20138
– volume-title: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1841-x
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.005
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02420.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.005
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07950.x
SSID ssj0014665
Score 2.2813334
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard...
WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard...
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) with excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff is a standard...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 791
SubjectTerms Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Canadian Upper Tract Collaboration
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - mortality
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery
Confidence intervals
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy - methods
Male
Medical sciences
Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)
Nephrectomy - methods
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Ontario - epidemiology
radical nephroureterectomy
Regression analysis
Retrospective Studies
Studies
survival
Survival Rate - trends
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
Tumors of the urinary system
upper urinary tract urothelial cancer
Ureteral Neoplasms - mortality
Ureteral Neoplasms - pathology
Ureteral Neoplasms - surgery
Urinary tract. Prostate gland
Title Comparison of oncological outcomes for open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: results from the Canadian Upper Tract Collaboration
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2012.11474.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148712
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1432078015
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1432616241
Volume 112
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlgVIofTd1ky4q9OrFluVXb9lNlxBIDyULezOSPYaSjW38gLa_oT-6M_KjccghlN4M9sjWeDT6pBl9w9gn5YUgM3DsLFe-LVP0g1ooaQcqCj2pQ1-bU--XX4PzrbzY-bsh_4nOwvT8ENOGG40M469pgCvd3B3k0paus6MMLUGst6FcEp6k1C3CR98mJil81FSV7EUQts-Teu5taDZTPa1Ug0rL-2oX98HRObo109PmObseO9ZnpVwvu1Yv0193OB__T89fsGcDiuWnvdm9ZI-geMUeXw5x-tfs93oqb8jLnJdFOvpYXnYtvg8ajmiZU-0uroqM73HOJl7Nsvqe8lqZ4BEvoKIqQjVl7FBw4ebnZ15D0-1blK7LG47glY_0CnxbVVDzKzr1xde3rfsN226-XK3P7aHug53KWEobUV0IucwjH9BX51EOjvRw0Z95WRDHvnaUJqOCEASxy6ggjIWOXUCpSEPueG_ZQVEW8I5xkAIbyt0I0kBmrlDgKooUS9oW8ILUYuH4j5N0IEWn2hz7ZLY4kgkpOyFlJ0bZyQ-LuZNk1RODPEBmMTOjSVAgCA8QiFnsZLSrZPAlDbblCQRyiNss9nG6jV6AQjuqgLLrnwncAOGYxY56e_zbuIdL3tAV2FdjVQ_-3GR1sTWX7_9Z8pg9EVQ_xGQ_nrCDtu7gA6K4Vi_Y4enqbLVZmHH6B_nkOss
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELVQkQAJUb4JlGIkrlkljhMn3GBFtZRuD2hX2lvkJBMJsU2ibCK1_Q390cw4HzRVDxXittJmvGtnPH72jN9j7JP2FMgMHDvLtW_LFONgIrS0Ax0qTybKT8yt9-VpsFjL442_6eWA6C5Mxw8xHrjRzDDxmiY4HUjfnOXSlq6zoRItQbS3Ss4QUN4ngW-zv_o5cknhs0ZXsrNB4D4t67m1pcla9bjSOxy2vNO7uA2QTvGtWaCO9tl26FpXl_J71jbJLL28wfr4n_r-lD3pgSz_0nneM3YPiufswbJP1b9gV_NR4ZCXOS-LdAizvGwb_EHYcQTMnOS7uC4yvsVlm6g1y-pXymtt8ke8gIqEhGoq2qH8wtnFZ17Drt02aF2XZxzxKx8YFvi6qqDmK7r4xefXHfwlWx99W80Xdi_9YKcyktJGYKcgl3noA4brPMzBkR7u-zMvC6LITxydkF-BAkEEMzpQkUgiF9AqTCB3vFdsrygLeMM4SIEN5W4IaSAzV2hwNSWLJZ0MeEFqMTW85DjtedFJnmMbT_ZHMqbBjmmwYzPY8bnF3NGy6rhB7mBzOPGj0VAgDg8Qi1nsYHCsuA8nO2zLE4jlELpZ7OP4NQYCyu7oAsq2eyZwA0RkFnvdOeTfxj3c9SpXYF-NW93578Zfj9fm49t_tvzAHi5Wy5P45Pvpj3fskSA5EVMMecD2mrqF9wjqmuTQTNY_sf89dA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlhVAofT_cpqkKvXqxZVm2e2s3XdK0CaVkYW9GtkcQsrGNdw1NfkN_dGfkR-uQQyi9GeyRrfFo9Ekz-oax9zqIQBbguYXRoStz9IOZ0NJVOo4CmUVhZk-9H5-ow6U8WoWrPv-JzsJ0_BDjhhuNDOuvaYDXhbk-yKUrfW9FGVqCWG8jOUM8eVcqLyYLP_gxUknhs7asZCeDuH2a1XNjS5Op6n6tN6g105W7uAmPTuGtnZ8WD9n50LMuLeV81m6zWX51jfTx_3T9EXvQw1j-sbO7x-wOlE_Y7nEfqH_Kfs3H-oa8Mrwq88HJ8qrd4vtgwxEucyrexXVZ8DVO2kSsWdVnOW-0jR7xEmoqI9RQyg5FFy4uP_AGNu16i9JNdcERvfKBX4Ev6xoafkrHvvj8b_N-xpaLz6fzQ7cv_ODmMpHSRVgXgZEmDgGdtYkNeDLAVX8RFCpJwszTGVkVRCCIXkarKBFZ4gNKxRkYL3jOdsqqhJeMgxTYkPFjyJUsfKHB1xQqlrQvEKjcYdHwj9O8Z0Wn4hzrdLI6kikpOyVlp1bZ6U-H-aNk3TGD3EJmf2JGo6BAFK4QiTlsb7CrtHcmG2wrEIjkELg57N14G90AxXZ0CVXbPaN8hXjMYS86e_zTeIBr3sgX2FdrVbf-3PTT0dJevvpnybds9_vBIv325eTra3ZPUC0Rmwm5x3a2TQtvENFts307VH8D2hc8LA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+oncological+outcomes+for+open+and+laparoscopic+radical+nephroureterectomy%3A+results+from+the+Canadian+Upper+Tract+Collaboration&rft.jtitle=BJU+international&rft.au=Fairey%2C+Adrian+S&rft.au=Kassouf%2C+Wassim&rft.au=Estey%2C+Eric&rft.au=Tanguay%2C+Simon&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=791&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2012.11474.x&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23148712&rft.externalDocID=23148712
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1464-4096&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1464-4096&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1464-4096&client=summon