Chronic Sensing of Subthalamic Local Field Potentials: Comparison of First and Second Generation Implantable Bidirectional Systems Within a Single Subject

Many adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to modulate therapeutic stimulation. In first-generation bidirectional neurostimulators, the ability to sense neural signals during active stimulati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroscience Vol. 15; p. 725797
Main Authors Cummins, Daniel D., Kochanski, Ryan B., Gilron, Roee, Swann, Nicole C., Little, Simon, Hammer, Lauren H., Starr, Philip A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 10.08.2021
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Many adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to modulate therapeutic stimulation. In first-generation bidirectional neurostimulators, the ability to sense neural signals during active stimulation was often limited by artifact. Newer devices, with improved design specifications for sensing, have recently been developed and are now clinically available. To compare the sensing capabilities of the first-generation Medtronic PC + S and second-generation Percept PC neurostimulators within a single patient. A 42-year-old man with Parkinson's disease was initially implanted with left STN DBS leads connected to a PC + S implantable pulse generator. Four years later, the PC + S was replaced with the Percept PC. Local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded, both with stimulation OFF and ON, at multiple timepoints with each device and compared. Offline processing of time series data included artifact removal using digital filtering and template subtraction, before subsequent spectral analysis. With Percept PC, embedded processing of spectral power within a narrow frequency band was also utilized. In the absence of stimulation, both devices demonstrated a peak in the beta range (approximately 20 Hz), which was stable throughout the 4-year period. Similar to previous reports, recordings with the PC + S during active stimulation demonstrated significant stimulation artifact, limiting the ability to recover meaningful LFP signal. In contrast, the Percept PC, using the same electrodes and stimulation settings, produced time series data during stimulation with spectral analysis revealing a peak in the beta-band. Online analysis by the Percept demonstrated a reduction in beta-band activity with increasing stimulation amplitude. This report highlights recent advances in implantable neurostimulator technology for DBS, demonstrating improvements in sensing capabilities during active stimulation between first- and second-generation devices. The ability to reliably sense during stimulation is an important step toward both the clinical implementation of adaptive algorithms and the further investigation into the neurophysiology underlying movement disorders.
AbstractList Many adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to modulate therapeutic stimulation. In first-generation bidirectional neurostimulators, the ability to sense neural signals during active stimulation was often limited by artifact. Newer devices, with improved design specifications for sensing, have recently been developed and are now clinically available. To compare the sensing capabilities of the first-generation Medtronic PC + S and second-generation Percept PC neurostimulators within a single patient. A 42-year-old man with Parkinson's disease was initially implanted with left STN DBS leads connected to a PC + S implantable pulse generator. Four years later, the PC + S was replaced with the Percept PC. Local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded, both with stimulation OFF and ON, at multiple timepoints with each device and compared. Offline processing of time series data included artifact removal using digital filtering and template subtraction, before subsequent spectral analysis. With Percept PC, embedded processing of spectral power within a narrow frequency band was also utilized. In the absence of stimulation, both devices demonstrated a peak in the beta range (approximately 20 Hz), which was stable throughout the 4-year period. Similar to previous reports, recordings with the PC + S during active stimulation demonstrated significant stimulation artifact, limiting the ability to recover meaningful LFP signal. In contrast, the Percept PC, using the same electrodes and stimulation settings, produced time series data during stimulation with spectral analysis revealing a peak in the beta-band. Online analysis by the Percept demonstrated a reduction in beta-band activity with increasing stimulation amplitude. This report highlights recent advances in implantable neurostimulator technology for DBS, demonstrating improvements in sensing capabilities during active stimulation between first- and second-generation devices. The ability to reliably sense during stimulation is an important step toward both the clinical implementation of adaptive algorithms and the further investigation into the neurophysiology underlying movement disorders.
Many adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to modulate therapeutic stimulation. In first-generation bidirectional neurostimulators, the ability to sense neural signals during active stimulation was often limited by artifact. Newer devices, with improved design specifications for sensing, have recently been developed and are now clinically available.BACKGROUNDMany adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to modulate therapeutic stimulation. In first-generation bidirectional neurostimulators, the ability to sense neural signals during active stimulation was often limited by artifact. Newer devices, with improved design specifications for sensing, have recently been developed and are now clinically available.To compare the sensing capabilities of the first-generation Medtronic PC + S and second-generation Percept PC neurostimulators within a single patient.OBJECTIVETo compare the sensing capabilities of the first-generation Medtronic PC + S and second-generation Percept PC neurostimulators within a single patient.A 42-year-old man with Parkinson's disease was initially implanted with left STN DBS leads connected to a PC + S implantable pulse generator. Four years later, the PC + S was replaced with the Percept PC. Local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded, both with stimulation OFF and ON, at multiple timepoints with each device and compared. Offline processing of time series data included artifact removal using digital filtering and template subtraction, before subsequent spectral analysis. With Percept PC, embedded processing of spectral power within a narrow frequency band was also utilized.METHODSA 42-year-old man with Parkinson's disease was initially implanted with left STN DBS leads connected to a PC + S implantable pulse generator. Four years later, the PC + S was replaced with the Percept PC. Local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded, both with stimulation OFF and ON, at multiple timepoints with each device and compared. Offline processing of time series data included artifact removal using digital filtering and template subtraction, before subsequent spectral analysis. With Percept PC, embedded processing of spectral power within a narrow frequency band was also utilized.In the absence of stimulation, both devices demonstrated a peak in the beta range (approximately 20 Hz), which was stable throughout the 4-year period. Similar to previous reports, recordings with the PC + S during active stimulation demonstrated significant stimulation artifact, limiting the ability to recover meaningful LFP signal. In contrast, the Percept PC, using the same electrodes and stimulation settings, produced time series data during stimulation with spectral analysis revealing a peak in the beta-band. Online analysis by the Percept demonstrated a reduction in beta-band activity with increasing stimulation amplitude.RESULTSIn the absence of stimulation, both devices demonstrated a peak in the beta range (approximately 20 Hz), which was stable throughout the 4-year period. Similar to previous reports, recordings with the PC + S during active stimulation demonstrated significant stimulation artifact, limiting the ability to recover meaningful LFP signal. In contrast, the Percept PC, using the same electrodes and stimulation settings, produced time series data during stimulation with spectral analysis revealing a peak in the beta-band. Online analysis by the Percept demonstrated a reduction in beta-band activity with increasing stimulation amplitude.This report highlights recent advances in implantable neurostimulator technology for DBS, demonstrating improvements in sensing capabilities during active stimulation between first- and second-generation devices. The ability to reliably sense during stimulation is an important step toward both the clinical implementation of adaptive algorithms and the further investigation into the neurophysiology underlying movement disorders.CONCLUSIONThis report highlights recent advances in implantable neurostimulator technology for DBS, demonstrating improvements in sensing capabilities during active stimulation between first- and second-generation devices. The ability to reliably sense during stimulation is an important step toward both the clinical implementation of adaptive algorithms and the further investigation into the neurophysiology underlying movement disorders.
BackgroundMany adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to modulate therapeutic stimulation. In first-generation bidirectional neurostimulators, the ability to sense neural signals during active stimulation was often limited by artifact. Newer devices, with improved design specifications for sensing, have recently been developed and are now clinically available.ObjectiveTo compare the sensing capabilities of the first-generation Medtronic PC + S and second-generation Percept PC neurostimulators within a single patient.MethodsA 42-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease was initially implanted with left STN DBS leads connected to a PC + S implantable pulse generator. Four years later, the PC + S was replaced with the Percept PC. Local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded, both with stimulation OFF and ON, at multiple timepoints with each device and compared. Offline processing of time series data included artifact removal using digital filtering and template subtraction, before subsequent spectral analysis. With Percept PC, embedded processing of spectral power within a narrow frequency band was also utilized.ResultsIn the absence of stimulation, both devices demonstrated a peak in the beta range (approximately 20 Hz), which was stable throughout the 4-year period. Similar to previous reports, recordings with the PC + S during active stimulation demonstrated significant stimulation artifact, limiting the ability to recover meaningful LFP signal. In contrast, the Percept PC, using the same electrodes and stimulation settings, produced time series data during stimulation with spectral analysis revealing a peak in the beta-band. Online analysis by the Percept demonstrated a reduction in beta-band activity with increasing stimulation amplitude.ConclusionThis report highlights recent advances in implantable neurostimulator technology for DBS, demonstrating improvements in sensing capabilities during active stimulation between first- and second-generation devices. The ability to reliably sense during stimulation is an important step toward both the clinical implementation of adaptive algorithms and the further investigation into the neurophysiology underlying movement disorders.
Background: Many adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to modulate therapeutic stimulation. In first-generation bidirectional neurostimulators, the ability to sense neural signals during active stimulation was often limited by artifact. Newer devices, with improved design specifications for sensing, have recently been developed and are now clinically available. Objective: To compare the sensing capabilities of the first-generation Medtronic PC+S and second-generation Percept PC neurostimulators within a single patient. Methods: A 42-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease was initially implanted with left STN DBS leads connected to a PC+S implantable pulse generator. Four years later, the PC+S was replaced with the Percept PC. Local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded, both with stimulation OFF and ON, at multiple timepoints with each device and compared. Offline processing of time series data included artifact removal using digital filtering and template subtraction, before subsequent spectral analysis. With Percept PC, embedded processing of spectral power within a narrow frequency band was also utilized. Results: In the absence of stimulation, both devices demonstrated a peak in the beta range (approximately 20 Hz), which was stable throughout the four-year period. Similar to previous reports, recordings with the PC+S during active stimulation demonstrated significant stimulation artifact, limiting the ability to recover meaningful LFP signal. In contrast, the Percept PC, using the same electrodes and stimulation settings, produced time series data during stimulation with spectral analysis revealing a peak in the beta-band. Online analysis by the Percept demonstrated a reduction in beta-band activity with increasing stimulation amplitude. Conclusion: This report highlights recent advances in implantable neurostimulator technology for DBS, demonstrating improvements in sensing capabilities during active stimulation between first- and second-generation devices. The ability to reliably sense during stimulation is an important step towards both the clinical implementation of adaptive algorithms and the further investigation into the neurophysiology underlying movement disorders.
Author Swann, Nicole C.
Starr, Philip A.
Hammer, Lauren H.
Cummins, Daniel D.
Kochanski, Ryan B.
Little, Simon
Gilron, Roee
AuthorAffiliation 1 School of Medicine, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, CA , United States
4 Department of Neurology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, CA , United States
3 Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR , United States
2 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, CA , United States
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 4 Department of Neurology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, CA , United States
– name: 3 Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR , United States
– name: 2 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, CA , United States
– name: 1 School of Medicine, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, CA , United States
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Daniel D.
  surname: Cummins
  fullname: Cummins, Daniel D.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ryan B.
  surname: Kochanski
  fullname: Kochanski, Ryan B.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Roee
  surname: Gilron
  fullname: Gilron, Roee
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Nicole C.
  surname: Swann
  fullname: Swann, Nicole C.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Simon
  surname: Little
  fullname: Little, Simon
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Lauren H.
  surname: Hammer
  fullname: Hammer, Lauren H.
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Philip A.
  surname: Starr
  fullname: Starr, Philip A.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kl2LEzEUhgdZcT_0B3gjAW-8ac3XzCReCFrsWigoVNG7kMkkbcpMUpNU2L_ir_W03ZXdBa8S3rznOYeT97I6CzHYqnpJ8JQxId-64EOeUkzJtKV1K9sn1QVpGjrhNft5du9-Xl3mvMW4oYLTZ9U545y3VPKL6s9sk2LwBq1syD6sUXRote_KRg96BHkZjR7Q3NuhR19jsaF4PeR3aBbHnU4-x3ComPuUC9KhB4yJcFzbYJMuHp4X427QoehusOij732y5qADdXWTix0z-uHLxgek0QoGABf034LpefXUQS_74va8qr7PP32bfZ4sv1wvZh-WE8MlKxNjuBGOWC5q5jrHO1Ab1lPWd1Zi1zXSad5yQ6iklNQtJQI7x1qrQTTMsatqceL2UW_VLvlRpxsVtVdHIaa10ql4M1hleS2kqzHREnMnei1pX1MtZY8FlbUA1vsTa7fvRtsb2FfSwwPow5fgN2odfyvBBG2lBMCbW0CKv_Y2FzX6bOwAK7RxnxWtmwaztsUNWF8_sm7jPsFiD64aWIxwDq5X9yf6N8pdBMDQngwmxZyTdcr4cvw6GNAPimB1CJs6hk0dwqZOYYNK8qjyDv7_mr9O3NsN
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_023_00779_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_epi_17722
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41593_023_01260_4
crossref_primary_10_1097_WNP_0000000000001137
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wnsx_2022_100140
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdbs_2023_05_003
crossref_primary_10_3390_bios13020265
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2022_119147
crossref_primary_10_1162_imag_a_00029
crossref_primary_10_1002_mds_30169
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurom_2022_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1427_23_2023
crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2022_3217469
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_022_00301_2
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_022_00350_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2024_101427
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurom_2023_01_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurom_2024_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2024_3459801
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2022_958521
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2021_763235
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdbs_2024_03_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10462_024_10948_3
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.09.014
10.3171/2016.11.JNS161162
10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182676b91
10.1136/jnnp-2015-310972
10.1101/2021.01.15.426827
10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.040
10.1002/ana.23951
10.1111/ene.14801
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5459-09.2010
10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.02.015
10.1109/TBCAS.2018.2880148
10.1080/17434440.2021.1909471
10.1016/j.clinph.2017.08.028
10.1016/j.bios.2020.112888
10.1093/brain/awx252
10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.06.012
10.1002/mds.23232
10.1002/mds.26837
10.1038/s41587-021-00897-5
10.1016/j.nbd.2019.03.013
10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.05.008
10.1007/s00701-020-04493-5
10.1016/j.brs.2019.02.020
10.1101/2020.10.02.322743
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2021 Cummins, Kochanski, Gilron, Swann, Little, Hammer and Starr.
2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright © 2021 Cummins, Kochanski, Gilron, Swann, Little, Hammer and Starr. 2021 Cummins, Kochanski, Gilron, Swann, Little, Hammer and Starr
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2021 Cummins, Kochanski, Gilron, Swann, Little, Hammer and Starr.
– notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: Copyright © 2021 Cummins, Kochanski, Gilron, Swann, Little, Hammer and Starr. 2021 Cummins, Kochanski, Gilron, Swann, Little, Hammer and Starr
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7XB
88I
8FE
8FH
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
LK8
M2P
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2021.725797
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection (subscription)
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central Student
Proquest SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Science Database
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic

Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1662-453X
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_e4589f501a904f8da92d52a99d082958
PMC8382799
34447294
10_3389_fnins_2021_725797
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NINDS NIH HHS
  grantid: UH3 NS100544
– fundername: National Institutes of Health
GroupedDBID ---
29H
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
88I
8FE
8FH
9T4
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACXDI
ADRAZ
AEGXH
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BPHCQ
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
FRP
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HYE
KQ8
LK8
M2P
M48
M7P
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RNS
RPM
W2D
C1A
IAO
IEA
IHR
ISR
M~E
NPM
3V.
7XB
8FK
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-cc4c8f1e4853fbf4b49363d23dbe90fb69fa474c129221572180ff37ea74cc3f3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1662-453X
1662-4548
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:26 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 17:53:48 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 17:22:50 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 11:53:52 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:39:44 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:46 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:39:25 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords bidirectional neural interface
local field potential
subthalamic nucleus
deep brain stimulation
beta oscillations
Language English
License Copyright © 2021 Cummins, Kochanski, Gilron, Swann, Little, Hammer and Starr.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c493t-cc4c8f1e4853fbf4b49363d23dbe90fb69fa474c129221572180ff37ea74cc3f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Ilknur Telkes, Albany Medical College, United States; Konrad Ciecierski, Research and Academic Computer Network, Poland
This article was submitted to Neural Technology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship
Edited by: John D. Rolston, The University of Utah, United States
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/e4589f501a904f8da92d52a99d082958
PMID 34447294
PQID 2559933144
PQPubID 4424402
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e4589f501a904f8da92d52a99d082958
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8382799
proquest_miscellaneous_2566037706
proquest_journals_2559933144
pubmed_primary_34447294
crossref_citationtrail_10_3389_fnins_2021_725797
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2021_725797
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-08-10
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-08-10
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-08-10
  day: 10
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
– name: Lausanne
PublicationTitle Frontiers in neuroscience
PublicationTitleAlternate Front Neurosci
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
Frontiers Media S.A
Publisher_xml – name: Frontiers Research Foundation
– name: Frontiers Media S.A
References Gilron (B6) 2021
Neumann (B16) 2017; 128
Jimenez-Shahed (B9) 2021; 18
Neumann (B15) 2021
López-Azcárate (B14) 2010; 30
Stanslaski (B21) 2018; 12
Giannicola (B5) 2012; 237
Novak (B17) 2009; 463
Swann (B22) 2018; 128
Tinkhauser (B23) 2017; 140
Özkurt (B18) 2011; 229
Koeglsperger (B10) 2021; 163
Little (B12) 2013; 74
Piña-Fuentes (B19) 2019; 121
Ray (B20) 2008; 213
Dastin-van Rijn (B3) 2020; 2021
Goyal (B7) 2021; 176
Abosch (B1) 2012; 71
Little (B11) 2016; 87
Velisar (B24) 2019; 12
Holdefer (B8) 2010; 25
Feldmann (B4) 2021; 28
Lofredi (B13) 2019; 127
Blumenfeld (B2) 2017; 32
References_xml – volume: 121
  start-page: 47
  year: 2019
  ident: B19
  article-title: The characteristics of pallidal low-frequency and beta bursts could help implementing adaptive brain stimulation in the parkinsonian and dystonic internal globus pallidus.
  publication-title: Neurobiol. Dis.
  doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.09.014
– volume: 128
  start-page: 605
  year: 2018
  ident: B22
  article-title: Chronic multisite brain recordings from a totally implantable bidirectional neural interface: experience in 5 patients with Parkinson’s disease.
  publication-title: J. Neurosurg.
  doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161162
– volume: 71
  start-page: 804
  year: 2012
  ident: B1
  article-title: Long-term recordings of local field potentials from implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes.
  publication-title: Neurosurgery
  doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182676b91
– volume: 87
  start-page: 717
  year: 2016
  ident: B11
  article-title: Bilateral adaptive deep brain stimulation is effective in Parkinson’s disease.
  publication-title: J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310972
– year: 2021
  ident: B15
  article-title: The sensitivity of ECG contamination to surgical implantation site in adaptive closed-loop neurostimulation systems.
  publication-title: ioRxiv
  doi: 10.1101/2021.01.15.426827
– volume: 463
  start-page: 12
  year: 2009
  ident: B17
  article-title: Effect of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus upon the contralateral subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson disease.
  publication-title: Neurosci. Lett.
  doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.040
– volume: 74
  start-page: 449
  year: 2013
  ident: B12
  article-title: Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease.
  publication-title: Ann. Neurol.
  doi: 10.1002/ana.23951
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2372
  year: 2021
  ident: B4
  article-title: Subthalamic beta band suppression reflects effective neuromodulation in chronic recordings.
  publication-title: Eur. J. Neurol.
  doi: 10.1111/ene.14801
– volume: 30
  start-page: 6667
  year: 2010
  ident: B14
  article-title: Coupling between beta and high-frequency activity in the human subthalamic nucleus may be a pathophysiological mechanism in Parkinson’s disease.
  publication-title: J. Neurosci.
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5459-09.2010
– volume: 229
  start-page: 324
  year: 2011
  ident: B18
  article-title: High frequency oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus: A neurophysiological marker of the motor state in Parkinson’s disease.
  publication-title: Exp. Neurol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.02.015
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1230
  year: 2018
  ident: B21
  article-title: A chronically implantable neural coprocessor for investigating the treatment of neurological disorders.
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circ. Syst.
  doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2018.2880148
– volume: 18
  start-page: 319
  year: 2021
  ident: B9
  article-title: Device profile of the percept PC deep brain stimulation system for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease and related disorders.
  publication-title: Exp. Rev. Med. Devices
  doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1909471
– volume: 128
  start-page: 2286
  year: 2017
  ident: B16
  article-title: Long term correlation of subthalamic beta band activity with motor impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
  publication-title: Clin. Neurophysiol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.08.028
– volume: 176
  year: 2021
  ident: B7
  article-title: The development of an implantable deep brain stimulation device with simultaneous chronic electrophysiological recording and stimulation in humans.
  publication-title: Biosens. Bioelectron.
  doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112888
– volume: 140
  start-page: 2968
  year: 2017
  ident: B23
  article-title: Beta burst dynamics in Parkinson’s disease OFF and ON dopaminergic medication.
  publication-title: Brain
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awx252
– volume: 237
  start-page: 312
  year: 2012
  ident: B5
  article-title: Subthalamic local field potentials after seven-year deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease.
  publication-title: Exp. Neurol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.06.012
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2067
  year: 2010
  ident: B8
  article-title: Intraoperative local field recording for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor.
  publication-title: Move. Disord.
  doi: 10.1002/mds.23232
– volume: 32
  start-page: 80
  year: 2017
  ident: B2
  article-title: Sixty-hertz stimulation improves bradykinesia and amplifies subthalamic low-frequency oscillations.
  publication-title: Mov. Disord.
  doi: 10.1002/mds.26837
– start-page: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: B6
  article-title: Long-term wireless streaming of neural recordings for circuit discovery and adaptive stimulation in individuals with Parkinson’s disease.
  publication-title: Nat. Biotechnol.
  doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00897-5
– volume: 127
  start-page: 462
  year: 2019
  ident: B13
  article-title: Beta bursts during continuous movements accompany the velocity decrement in Parkinson’s disease patients.
  publication-title: Neurobiol. Dis.
  doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.03.013
– volume: 213
  start-page: 108
  year: 2008
  ident: B20
  article-title: Local field potential beta activity in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease is associated with improvements in bradykinesia after dopamine and deep brain stimulation.
  publication-title: Exp. Neurol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.05.008
– volume: 163
  start-page: 205
  year: 2021
  ident: B10
  article-title: Bilateral double beta peaks in a PD patient with STN electrodes.
  publication-title: Acta Neurochir.
  doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04493-5
– volume: 12
  start-page: 868
  year: 2019
  ident: B24
  article-title: Dual threshold neural closed loop deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease patients.
  publication-title: Brain Stimul.
  doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.02.020
– volume: 2021
  year: 2020
  ident: B3
  article-title: Uncovering biomarkers during therapeutic neuromodulation with PARRM: period-based artifact reconstruction and removal method.
  publication-title: Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1101/2020.10.02.322743
SSID ssj0062842
Score 2.407375
Snippet Many adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to...
Background: Many adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in...
BackgroundMany adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 725797
SubjectTerms beta oscillations
bidirectional neural interface
Deep brain stimulation
Design specifications
Electrophysiological recording
local field potential
Magnetic resonance imaging
Movement disorders
Neurodegenerative diseases
Neuroscience
Parkinson's disease
Software
Solitary tract nucleus
subthalamic nucleus
Time series
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagvXBBQHmEFmQkxAEpNBs7js0FdauuKgRVRanoLfIj7kYqTmnTA3-FX8uM4426CPW28ivWznheHn9DyFtQgaCYhcul9zbnxppctxx-WTB_tSlqL_E18tcjcXjKP59VZyngdp3SKlcyMQpq11uMke9GaCzGwP7_dPkrx6pReLuaSmjcJ5sggiU4X5vzg6PjbytZLED4xvtOgW-DwDgf7zXBLVO7PnQB8brL2Yca-BZRn25ppgjg_z-r89_kyVvaaPGIPExmJN0b6f6Y3GvDE7K1F8CF_vmbvqMxsTNGzLfInwSAS08wWT2c095TkBfDUl9gMXr6BdUZXWAqGz3uB0wfAp78SPenEoU4Y9GBnUh1cLAM-NCOjoDVSFeKEMNAIXyFRefdqCVjiJEmQHT6oxuWXaCansAGYBR8HwNAT8np4uD7_mGeSjLklis25NZyK_2s5aDlvfHcQKtgrmTOtKrwRiiveQ2ELlUJxgS4l7LwntWthkbLPHtGNkIf2heEVoY7C6uUM-gTM2MYLGwLWUtflE7qjBQrcjQ24ZVj2YyLBvwWpGATKdggBZuRghl5P025HME67ho8RxpPAxFnOzb0V-dNOrZNyyupfFXMtCq4l06r0lWlVsrhm-RKZmRnxSFNOvzwkYlVM_Jm6oZji3cxOrT9DY4RomB1XYiMPB8ZatoJ45yDzwOz6zVWW9vqek_olhEaXDJZ1kq9vHtb2-QB_hF5RPbdIRvD1U37CmyrwbxOB-gvoQQmyw
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA_n-eKLqOdH9ZQI4oPQM23SJhFE7g6XQzwRzsV7K_lobgt7qa498P4V_1pn2m5xZfHJt5KvppmZzkwy-Q0hL0AFgmIufapCcKmwzqamFvDkwPw1lsmg8Dby6afyZC4-nBfnO2Sd3mpcwB9bXTvMJzVfLQ9-fr9-BwL_Fj1O0LevQ2wiIm_n2YEEDtTyBrkJikminJ6K6VChhD9xPhxsbu-2oZp6BP9tZuff0ZN_qKPZHXJ7tCPp4UD4u2SnjvfI3mEEH_rymr6kfWRnv2W-R36NCLj0DKPV4wVtA4UfRrcwS8xGTz-iPqMzjGWjn9sO44dgcd7Q4ylHIfaYNWAoUhM9DANOtKcDYjUSliLGMJAIr2HRo2ZQk_0eIx0R0enXpls0kRp6BhOAVvB-3AG6T-az91-OT9IxJ0PqhOZd6pxwKmS1ADUfbBAWSkvuc-5trVmwpQ5GSKB0rnOwJsC_VCwELmsDhY4H_oDsxjbWjwgtrPAORskzqCszazkM7JiSKrDcK5MQtiZH5UbAcsybsazAcUEKVj0FK6RgNVAwIa-mLt8GtI5_NT5CGk8NEWi7L2hXF9Uot1UtCqVDwTKjmQjKG537Ijdae7yUXKiE7K85pFozb9XDuHEOvmpCnk_VILd4GGNi3V5hm7JkXEpWJuThwFDTTLgQApwe6C03WG1jqps1sVn02OCKq1xq_fh_fNsTcguXK-0BgPfJbre6qp-CCdbZZ71g_Qb29jQC
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Chronic Sensing of Subthalamic Local Field Potentials: Comparison of First and Second Generation Implantable Bidirectional Systems Within a Single Subject
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447294
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2559933144
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2566037706
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8382799
https://doaj.org/article/e4589f501a904f8da92d52a99d082958
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQuXBBQHkslMpIiANSqGM7ic2tW3VVIVpVlIreIj_ibqTiRSg98Ff4tczY2WgXIbhwiSK_kxl7ZuzxN4S8BhEIgrn2hQrBFdI6W5hOwpsD9ddY1gSFt5FPz-qTS_nhqrraCPWFPmEZHjj_uINOVkqHipVGMxmUN5r7ihutPd4KrdI1X5B5a2Mqr8E1LLo8n2GCCaYPQuwjYnPz8l0DPIoITxtSKIH1_0nD_N1RckPyLB6Q-6PKSA_zUB-SO118RHYPI5jLX3_QNzQ5cabd8V3ycwS7pRfomB6v6SpQWBuGpbnBwPP0I4ouukC3NXq-GtBVCPjvPT2awhFijUUPOiE10UMzYC97msGpkYYU4YSBGnjjis77LBHTdiIdwc_pl35Y9pEaegEDgFLQP272PCaXi-PPRyfFGH6hcFKLoXBOOhXKToJEDzZIC6m18Fx422kWbK2DkQ0QlWsOigOYkoqFIJrOQKITQTwhO3EVu2eEVlZ6B63wEvLq0loBDTumGhUY98rMCFuTo3UjNjmGyLhpwUZBCraJgi1SsM0UnJG3U5VvGZjjb4XnSOOpIGJqpwTgtHbktPZfnDYje2sOaceJDp0gYpsQYJbOyKspG6YonruY2K1usUxdM9E0rJ6Rp5mhppEIKSXYN1C72WK1raFu58R-mWDAlVC80fr5__i2F-Qe_q4iYf3ukZ3h-233ErStwe6Tu_Pjs_NP-2mCwfNUql9-6C2a
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbK9gAXBJTHQgEjAQek0GzsJDYSQt3S1ZZuVxVtRW_BduJuJHBKSYX6V_gR_EZmnIe6CPXW28qvjHbG87DH3xDyEkwgGOYkD4S1JuDa6EAVHH4ZcH-VDlMr8DXy3jyZHvFPx_HxCvnTvYXBtMpOJ3pFnVcGz8g3PDQWY-D_fzj9EWDVKLxd7UpoNGKxW1z8gpDt5_udj8DfV1E02T7cmgZtVYHAcMnqwBhuhB0VHAyV1ZZraE1YHrFcFzK0OpFW8RRojWQE9hAiJBFay9JCQaNhlsG6N8gqZxDKDMjqeHu-_7nT_Qkoe3-_muBbJAgGmntUCAPlhnWlQ3zwaPQ2hX2CKFOXLKEvGPA_L_ffZM1L1m9yh9xu3Va62cjZXbJSuHtkbdNByP79gr6mPpHUn9Cvkd8t4C49wOR4d0IrS0E_1QsF0gfNMzSfdIKpc3S_qjFdCfbAO7rVl0TEGZMS_FKqXA7LQMye0wYgG-WIIqQxSAS--qLjsrHK_kiTtgDs9EtZL0pHFT0AAmAUfB8PnO6To2th1gMycJUrHhEaa54bWCUaQV8y0prBwiYUqbBhlAs1JGHHjsy0-OhYpuNbBnEScjDzHMyQg1nDwSF50085bcBBrho8Rh73AxHX2zdUZydZqyaygsdC2jgcKRlyK3IlozyOlJQ5voGOxZCsdxKStcoGPtJvjSF50XeDmsC7H-WK6hzHJEnI0jRMhuRhI1A9JYxzDjEWzE6XRG2J1OUeVy48FLlgIkqlfHw1Wc_Jzenh3iyb7cx3n5Bb-KcEHlV4nQzqs_PiKfh1tX7WbiZKvl73_v0Lgytj5g
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLZGJyFeEDAuhQFGAh6QQt3YSWwkhNZt1cZGVTGm7S04drxGgmSMTGh_hZ_Cr-Mc56IVob3trfItVs_dPv4OIS_BBIJhjm0gnTOByEwW6FzALwPur85Y4iS-Rv40i3cOxcfj6HiF_OnewmBaZacTvaK2lcEz8pGHxuIc_P-Ra9Mi5lvTD6c_AqwghTetXTmNhkX28otfEL79fL-7BbR-FYbT7S-bO0FbYSAwQvE6MEYY6ca5AKPlMicyaI25DbnNcsVcFiunRQL7DlUIthGiJcmc40muodFwx2HdG2Q1gaiIDcjqZHs2_9zZgRgUv79rjfFdEgQGzZ0qhIRq5MqiRKzwcPw2AZlBxKlLVtEXD_ifx_tv4uYlSzi9Q263LizdaHjuLlnJy3tkbaOE8P37BX1NfVKpP61fI79b8F16gIny5QmtHAVdVS80cCI076MppVNMo6PzqsbUJZCHd3SzL4-IM6YF-KhUlxaWgfjd0gYsG3mKIrwxcAe-AKOTorHQ_niTtmDs9KioF0VJNT2ADcAo-D4ePt0nh9dCrAdkUFZl_ojQKBPWwCrhGPricZZxWNgwmUjHQiv1kLCOHKlpsdKxZMe3FGImpGDqKZgiBdOGgkPypp9y2gCFXDV4gjTuByLGt2-ozk7SVmWkuYikchEba8WEk1ar0EahVsrie-hIDsl6xyFpq3jgI72YDMmLvhtUBt4D6TKvznFMHDOeJCwekocNQ_U74UIIiLdgdrLEaktbXe4pi4WHJZdcholSj6_e1nNyE-Q23d-d7T0ht_A_CTzA8DoZ1Gfn-VNw8ersWStLlHy9bvH9C_WcaBs
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chronic+Sensing+of+Subthalamic+Local+Field+Potentials%3A+Comparison+of+First+and+Second+Generation+Implantable+Bidirectional+Systems+Within+a+Single+Subject&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+neuroscience&rft.au=Daniel+D.+Cummins&rft.au=Ryan+B.+Kochanski&rft.au=Roee+Gilron&rft.au=Nicole+C.+Swann&rft.date=2021-08-10&rft.pub=Frontiers+Media+S.A&rft.eissn=1662-453X&rft.volume=15&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffnins.2021.725797&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_e4589f501a904f8da92d52a99d082958
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1662-453X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1662-453X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1662-453X&client=summon