The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students' clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review
Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at i...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC medical education Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 365 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
13.05.2022
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at improving undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO from 1990 to January 2022, to identify all experimental articles testing the effectiveness of virtual patient educational tools on medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Quality of the articles was assessed using an adapted form of the MERSQI and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis summarised intervention features, how virtual patient tools were evaluated and reported effectiveness.
The search revealed 8,186 articles, with 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Average study quality was moderate (M = 6.5, SD = 2.7), with nearly half not reporting any measurement of validity or reliability for their clinical reasoning outcome measure (8/19, 42%). Eleven articles found a positive effect of virtual patient tools on reasoning (11/19, 58%). Four reported no significant effect and four reported mixed effects (4/19, 21%). Several domains of clinical reasoning were evaluated. Data gathering, ideas about diagnosis and patient management were more often found to improve after virtual patient use (34/47 analyses, 72%) than application of knowledge, flexibility in thinking and problem-solving (3/7 analyses, 43%).
Using virtual patient tools could effectively complement current teaching especially if opportunities for face-to-face teaching or other methods are limited, as there was some evidence that virtual patient educational tools can improve undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Evaluations that measured more case specific clinical reasoning domains, such as data gathering, showed more consistent improvement than general measures like problem-solving. Case specific measures might be more sensitive to change given the context dependent nature of clinical reasoning. Consistent use of validated clinical reasoning measures is needed to enable a meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BACKGROUNDUse of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at improving undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills. METHODSWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO from 1990 to January 2022, to identify all experimental articles testing the effectiveness of virtual patient educational tools on medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Quality of the articles was assessed using an adapted form of the MERSQI and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis summarised intervention features, how virtual patient tools were evaluated and reported effectiveness. RESULTSThe search revealed 8,186 articles, with 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Average study quality was moderate (M = 6.5, SD = 2.7), with nearly half not reporting any measurement of validity or reliability for their clinical reasoning outcome measure (8/19, 42%). Eleven articles found a positive effect of virtual patient tools on reasoning (11/19, 58%). Four reported no significant effect and four reported mixed effects (4/19, 21%). Several domains of clinical reasoning were evaluated. Data gathering, ideas about diagnosis and patient management were more often found to improve after virtual patient use (34/47 analyses, 72%) than application of knowledge, flexibility in thinking and problem-solving (3/7 analyses, 43%). CONCLUSIONSUsing virtual patient tools could effectively complement current teaching especially if opportunities for face-to-face teaching or other methods are limited, as there was some evidence that virtual patient educational tools can improve undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Evaluations that measured more case specific clinical reasoning domains, such as data gathering, showed more consistent improvement than general measures like problem-solving. Case specific measures might be more sensitive to change given the context dependent nature of clinical reasoning. Consistent use of validated clinical reasoning measures is needed to enable a meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness. Background Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at improving undergraduate medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO from 1990 to January 2022, to identify all experimental articles testing the effectiveness of virtual patient educational tools on medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Quality of the articles was assessed using an adapted form of the MERSQI and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis summarised intervention features, how virtual patient tools were evaluated and reported effectiveness. Results The search revealed 8,186 articles, with 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Average study quality was moderate (M = 6.5, SD = 2.7), with nearly half not reporting any measurement of validity or reliability for their clinical reasoning outcome measure (8/19, 42%). Eleven articles found a positive effect of virtual patient tools on reasoning (11/19, 58%). Four reported no significant effect and four reported mixed effects (4/19, 21%). Several domains of clinical reasoning were evaluated. Data gathering, ideas about diagnosis and patient management were more often found to improve after virtual patient use (34/47 analyses, 72%) than application of knowledge, flexibility in thinking and problem-solving (3/7 analyses, 43%). Conclusions Using virtual patient tools could effectively complement current teaching especially if opportunities for face-to-face teaching or other methods are limited, as there was some evidence that virtual patient educational tools can improve undergraduate medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Evaluations that measured more case specific clinical reasoning domains, such as data gathering, showed more consistent improvement than general measures like problem-solving. Case specific measures might be more sensitive to change given the context dependent nature of clinical reasoning. Consistent use of validated clinical reasoning measures is needed to enable a meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness. Background Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at improving undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO from 1990 to January 2022, to identify all experimental articles testing the effectiveness of virtual patient educational tools on medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Quality of the articles was assessed using an adapted form of the MERSQI and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis summarised intervention features, how virtual patient tools were evaluated and reported effectiveness. Results The search revealed 8,186 articles, with 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Average study quality was moderate (M = 6.5, SD = 2.7), with nearly half not reporting any measurement of validity or reliability for their clinical reasoning outcome measure (8/19, 42%). Eleven articles found a positive effect of virtual patient tools on reasoning (11/19, 58%). Four reported no significant effect and four reported mixed effects (4/19, 21%). Several domains of clinical reasoning were evaluated. Data gathering, ideas about diagnosis and patient management were more often found to improve after virtual patient use (34/47 analyses, 72%) than application of knowledge, flexibility in thinking and problem-solving (3/7 analyses, 43%). Conclusions Using virtual patient tools could effectively complement current teaching especially if opportunities for face-to-face teaching or other methods are limited, as there was some evidence that virtual patient educational tools can improve undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Evaluations that measured more case specific clinical reasoning domains, such as data gathering, showed more consistent improvement than general measures like problem-solving. Case specific measures might be more sensitive to change given the context dependent nature of clinical reasoning. Consistent use of validated clinical reasoning measures is needed to enable a meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness. Keywords: Computer simulation, Virtual patient, Computer-assisted instruction, Educational technology, Medical education, Clinical decision-making, Clinical reasoning, Clinical skills, Review, Medical students Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at improving undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO from 1990 to January 2022, to identify all experimental articles testing the effectiveness of virtual patient educational tools on medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Quality of the articles was assessed using an adapted form of the MERSQI and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis summarised intervention features, how virtual patient tools were evaluated and reported effectiveness. The search revealed 8,186 articles, with 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Average study quality was moderate (M = 6.5, SD = 2.7), with nearly half not reporting any measurement of validity or reliability for their clinical reasoning outcome measure (8/19, 42%). Eleven articles found a positive effect of virtual patient tools on reasoning (11/19, 58%). Four reported no significant effect and four reported mixed effects (4/19, 21%). Several domains of clinical reasoning were evaluated. Data gathering, ideas about diagnosis and patient management were more often found to improve after virtual patient use (34/47 analyses, 72%) than application of knowledge, flexibility in thinking and problem-solving (3/7 analyses, 43%). Using virtual patient tools could effectively complement current teaching especially if opportunities for face-to-face teaching or other methods are limited, as there was some evidence that virtual patient educational tools can improve undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Evaluations that measured more case specific clinical reasoning domains, such as data gathering, showed more consistent improvement than general measures like problem-solving. Case specific measures might be more sensitive to change given the context dependent nature of clinical reasoning. Consistent use of validated clinical reasoning measures is needed to enable a meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness. Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at improving undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO from 1990 to January 2022, to identify all experimental articles testing the effectiveness of virtual patient educational tools on medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Quality of the articles was assessed using an adapted form of the MERSQI and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis summarised intervention features, how virtual patient tools were evaluated and reported effectiveness. The search revealed 8,186 articles, with 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Average study quality was moderate (M = 6.5, SD = 2.7), with nearly half not reporting any measurement of validity or reliability for their clinical reasoning outcome measure (8/19, 42%). Eleven articles found a positive effect of virtual patient tools on reasoning (11/19, 58%). Four reported no significant effect and four reported mixed effects (4/19, 21%). Several domains of clinical reasoning were evaluated. Data gathering, ideas about diagnosis and patient management were more often found to improve after virtual patient use (34/47 analyses, 72%) than application of knowledge, flexibility in thinking and problem-solving (3/7 analyses, 43%). Using virtual patient tools could effectively complement current teaching especially if opportunities for face-to-face teaching or other methods are limited, as there was some evidence that virtual patient educational tools can improve undergraduate medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Evaluations that measured more case specific clinical reasoning domains, such as data gathering, showed more consistent improvement than general measures like problem-solving. Case specific measures might be more sensitive to change given the context dependent nature of clinical reasoning. Consistent use of validated clinical reasoning measures is needed to enable a meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness. Abstract Background Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at improving undergraduate medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO from 1990 to January 2022, to identify all experimental articles testing the effectiveness of virtual patient educational tools on medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Quality of the articles was assessed using an adapted form of the MERSQI and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis summarised intervention features, how virtual patient tools were evaluated and reported effectiveness. Results The search revealed 8,186 articles, with 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Average study quality was moderate (M = 6.5, SD = 2.7), with nearly half not reporting any measurement of validity or reliability for their clinical reasoning outcome measure (8/19, 42%). Eleven articles found a positive effect of virtual patient tools on reasoning (11/19, 58%). Four reported no significant effect and four reported mixed effects (4/19, 21%). Several domains of clinical reasoning were evaluated. Data gathering, ideas about diagnosis and patient management were more often found to improve after virtual patient use (34/47 analyses, 72%) than application of knowledge, flexibility in thinking and problem-solving (3/7 analyses, 43%). Conclusions Using virtual patient tools could effectively complement current teaching especially if opportunities for face-to-face teaching or other methods are limited, as there was some evidence that virtual patient educational tools can improve undergraduate medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Evaluations that measured more case specific clinical reasoning domains, such as data gathering, showed more consistent improvement than general measures like problem-solving. Case specific measures might be more sensitive to change given the context dependent nature of clinical reasoning. Consistent use of validated clinical reasoning measures is needed to enable a meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness. |
ArticleNumber | 365 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Plackett, Ruth Kambouri, Maria Sheringham, Jessica Mylan, Sophie Raine, Rosalind Kassianos, Angelos P |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ruth surname: Plackett fullname: Plackett, Ruth email: ruth.plackett.15@ucl.ac.uk organization: Department of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. ruth.plackett.15@ucl.ac.uk – sequence: 2 givenname: Angelos P surname: Kassianos fullname: Kassianos, Angelos P organization: Department of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: Sophie surname: Mylan fullname: Mylan, Sophie organization: Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England – sequence: 4 givenname: Maria surname: Kambouri fullname: Kambouri, Maria organization: Institute of Education, UCL, London, UK – sequence: 5 givenname: Rosalind surname: Raine fullname: Raine, Rosalind organization: Department of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK – sequence: 6 givenname: Jessica surname: Sheringham fullname: Sheringham, Jessica organization: Department of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptks1u1DAUhSNURH_gBVigSCxgk-LfJGaBVFUFKlViU9aW41xPPST2YCdD-wY8du_MlNJBKFJi3XvuZ5_4HBcHIQYoiteUnFLa1h8yZYqoijBWES4oqW6fFUdUNKyqFSMHT9aHxXHOS0Jo03L6ojjkUkpCWnlU_L6-gRKcAzv5NQTIuYyunLMPi3Lt0zSboVyZyUOYSuhni8sYsDbFOGR8l35cpbiGcoTeW2zkae5RnN-VdvBhW0pgcgwbYv7hhyF_LE2Z7_IEI9Isttcefr0snjszZHj18D0pvn--uD7_Wl19-3J5fnZVWaH4VLV4csUbIzYOqASoO9nxtm8Ys44JK2rJu74zrKWK88aSTvUto72SvFFGOH5SXO64fTRLvUp-NOlOR-P1thDTQpuExxpAy5oBtU5SwpVgzqkaN-GtaCyljDmCrE871mru0L9F38kMe9D9TvA3ehHXGq-t5XIDeP8ASPHnDHnSo88WhsEEiHPWrK5Fo2jDOUrf_iNdxjnhVWxV6BqV9K9qYdCADy7ivnYD1WcN4VK0spGoOv2PCp8eRm8xZM5jfW-A7QZsijkncI8eKdGbLOpdFjVmUW-zqG9x6M3Tv_M48id8_B6phdw6 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_023_04421_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_023_04422_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2023_108102 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_024_05518_8 crossref_primary_10_1515_dx_2023_0099 crossref_primary_10_2196_59213 crossref_primary_10_3390_mps7020023 crossref_primary_10_14406_acu_2024_001 crossref_primary_10_11124_JBIES_23_00348 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcsop_2023_100316 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_023_04955_1 crossref_primary_10_3389_frvir_2024_1377210 crossref_primary_10_1177_0976500X231159456 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_024_05154_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_024_05719_1 crossref_primary_10_15407_internalmed2023_02_055 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2024_2337254 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_64073 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_024_05121_x crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_023_04834_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_024_05241_4 crossref_primary_10_2196_43699 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radi_2023_11_009 crossref_primary_10_1080_10872981_2024_2322223 |
Cites_doi | 10.3109/01421590903514630 10.2196/jmir.4141 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00701.x 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb02084.x 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1841892 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.017 10.3390/ijerph17155325 10.1515/dx-2020-0160 10.1001/jama.298.9.1002 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02394.x 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01917.x 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.002 10.1080/01421590903002821 10.1056/NEJM198310133091511 10.1001/jama.2011.1234 10.1371/journal.pone.0203851 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02650.x 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.041 10.1007/s10459-018-9830-5 10.1111/medu.14152 10.1097/00001888-199503000-00009 10.1111/medu.12795 10.11613/BM.2012.031 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01567.x 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000514 10.2196/jmir.5035 10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.028 10.1186/s12909-018-1395-8 10.1186/s12909-017-1004-2 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001961 10.2196/16504 10.3109/0142159X.2012.706727 10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3 10.1207/S15328015TLM1204_5 10.1080/01421590903095502 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03286.x 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x 10.3402/meo.v19.25940 10.2196/14676 10.1001/jama.300.10.1181 10.1111/imj.13304 10.2196/13028 10.1186/s12909-020-02168-4 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.035 10.1080/01421590500046924 10.1186/s12909-021-02591-1 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2022 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 0-V 3V. 7X7 7XB 88B 88C 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR CCPQU CJNVE COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ K9. M0P M0S M0T M1P PIMPY PQEDU PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12909-022-03410-x |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】 ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Education Database (Alumni Edition) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Education Collection Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Education Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Health Management Database (Proquest) Medical Database Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) ProQuest One Education ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Education ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Social Science Premium Collection Education Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Education Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1472-6920 |
EndPage | 365 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_562e1cf5103942ff9622c3847c1122f0 A703548575 10_1186_s12909_022_03410_x 35550085 |
Genre | Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United Kingdom |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: School for Public Health Research grantid: PD-SPH-2015 – fundername: NIHR Policy Research Unit in Cancer Awareness, Screening and Early Diagnosis grantid: 106/0001 – fundername: ; – fundername: ; grantid: PD-SPH-2015 – fundername: ; grantid: 106/0001; 106/0001; 106/0001 |
GroupedDBID | --- -5C -5G -A0 -BR 0-V 0R~ 23N 2WC 3V. 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIHN ACRMQ ADBBV ADINQ ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI ARALO AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU CGR CJNVE CS3 CUY CVF DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ECM EIF EMB EMOBN F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK IAO IHR INH INR ITC IVC KQ8 M0P M0T M1P M48 M~E NPM O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT PIMPY PQEDU PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SHS SOJ SV3 TR2 UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX CITATION 7XB 8FK COVID K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-8555937a4555015ee6b5b38d722cf24c4653bdba2819337c0b9d821d95379a4f3 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1472-6920 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:14:29 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 20:34:25 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 05 06:06:57 EDT 2024 Fri Nov 08 21:55:54 EST 2024 Tue Nov 19 20:52:08 EST 2024 Tue Nov 12 22:55:41 EST 2024 Thu Nov 21 22:56:25 EST 2024 Wed Oct 16 00:41:21 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Medical students Clinical skills Computer simulation Computer-assisted instruction Educational technology Virtual patient Clinical reasoning Medical education Review Clinical decision-making |
Language | English |
License | 2022. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c493t-8555937a4555015ee6b5b38d722cf24c4653bdba2819337c0b9d821d95379a4f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098350/ |
PMID | 35550085 |
PQID | 2666536471 |
PQPubID | 42593 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_562e1cf5103942ff9622c3847c1122f0 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9098350 proquest_miscellaneous_2664791733 proquest_journals_2666536471 gale_infotracmisc_A703548575 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A703548575 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_022_03410_x pubmed_primary_35550085 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-05-13 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-05-13 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2022 text: 2022-05-13 day: 13 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC medical education |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Med Educ |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | P Devitt (3410_CR38) 1998; 68 DP Muller (3410_CR19) 2021; 43 K Kahl (3410_CR36) 2010; 122 CL Foronda (3410_CR17) 2020; 15 R Kleinert (3410_CR47) 2015; 17 A Middeke (3410_CR30) 2018; 13 DA Kolb (3410_CR7) 1984 L Niu (3410_CR55) 2013; 9 F Schubach (3410_CR32) 2017; 17 JN Scott (3410_CR54) 1998; 32 AA Kononowicz (3410_CR15) 2019; 21 A Isaza-Restrepo (3410_CR35) 2018; 18 O Aghili (3410_CR46) 2012; 4 ML McHugh (3410_CR24) 2012; 22 DA Reed (3410_CR25) 2007; 298 B Charlin (3410_CR43) 2000; 12 WC McGaghie (3410_CR11) 2016; 50 DA Cook (3410_CR14) 2008; 300 BD Homer (3410_CR53) 2014; 36 3410_CR2 T Watari (3410_CR31) 2020; 17 3410_CR3 J Kassier (3410_CR52) 1983; 309 T Raupach (3410_CR33) 2009; 31 F Consorti (3410_CR12) 2012; 59 DA Cook (3410_CR13) 2010; 85 CL Richardson (3410_CR16) 2020; 6 B Page (3410_CR26) 1995; 70 DA Cook (3410_CR22) 2011; 306 R Plackett (3410_CR34) 2020; 20 S Barry Issenberg (3410_CR10) 2005; 27 M Dekhtyar (3410_CR49) 2021; 9 G Bordage (3410_CR42) 2018; 23 J Lee (3410_CR21) 2020; 54 A Vallée (3410_CR18) 2020; 22 G Bordage (3410_CR45) 1990; 24 S Kim (3410_CR27) 2018; 93 B Wu (3410_CR41) 2014; 19 KA Ericsson (3410_CR6) 2008; 15 YH Qin (3410_CR39) 2022; 29 SH Chon (3410_CR29) 2019; 7 S Mamede (3410_CR51) 2004; 38 AL Kalet (3410_CR50) 2012; 34 M Io (3410_CR4) 2015 D Moher (3410_CR23) 2009; 6 IS Hege (3410_CR20) 2020; 37 M Botezatu (3410_CR48) 2010; 32 M Sobocan (3410_CR28) 2017; 47 P Bradley (3410_CR8) 2006; 40 AA Kononowicz (3410_CR9) 2015; 15 T Raupach (3410_CR37) 2021; 21 R Lehmann (3410_CR40) 2015; 17 AL Kalet (3410_CR44) 2007; 194 DA Cook (3410_CR5) 2009; 43 JA Cleland (3410_CR1) 2009; 31 AJ Viera (3410_CR56) 2005; 37 |
References_xml | – volume-title: Experiential learning : experience as the source of learning and development year: 1984 ident: 3410_CR7 contributor: fullname: DA Kolb – volume: 32 start-page: 562 issue: 7 year: 2010 ident: 3410_CR48 publication-title: Med Teach doi: 10.3109/01421590903514630 contributor: fullname: M Botezatu – volume: 17 start-page: e162 issue: 7 year: 2015 ident: 3410_CR40 publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/jmir.4141 contributor: fullname: R Lehmann – volume: 32 start-page: 14 issue: 1 year: 1998 ident: 3410_CR54 publication-title: Med Educ doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00701.x contributor: fullname: JN Scott – volume: 37 start-page: 360 issue: 5 year: 2005 ident: 3410_CR56 publication-title: Fam Med contributor: fullname: AJ Viera – volume: 15 start-page: 46 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 3410_CR17 publication-title: Simul Healthc doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411 contributor: fullname: CL Foronda – volume: 68 start-page: 284 issue: 4 year: 1998 ident: 3410_CR38 publication-title: Aust N Z J Surg doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb02084.x contributor: fullname: P Devitt – volume: 43 start-page: 137 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 3410_CR19 publication-title: Med Teach doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1841892 contributor: fullname: DP Muller – volume-title: Improving Diagnosis in Health Care year: 2015 ident: 3410_CR4 contributor: fullname: M Io – volume: 59 start-page: 1001 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 3410_CR12 publication-title: Comput Educ doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.017 contributor: fullname: F Consorti – volume: 17 start-page: 5325 issue: 15 year: 2020 ident: 3410_CR31 publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155325 contributor: fullname: T Watari – volume: 9 start-page: 69 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 3410_CR49 publication-title: Diagnosis doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0160 contributor: fullname: M Dekhtyar – volume: 298 start-page: 1002 issue: 9 year: 2007 ident: 3410_CR25 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1002 contributor: fullname: DA Reed – volume: 40 start-page: 254 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 3410_CR8 publication-title: Med Educ doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02394.x contributor: fullname: P Bradley – volume: 38 start-page: 1302 issue: 12 year: 2004 ident: 3410_CR51 publication-title: Med Educ doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01917.x contributor: fullname: S Mamede – volume: 9 start-page: 114 year: 2013 ident: 3410_CR55 publication-title: Educ Res Rev doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.002 contributor: fullname: L Niu – ident: 3410_CR3 – volume: 31 start-page: 477 issue: 6 year: 2009 ident: 3410_CR1 publication-title: Med Teach doi: 10.1080/01421590903002821 contributor: fullname: JA Cleland – volume: 309 start-page: 921 issue: 15 year: 1983 ident: 3410_CR52 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM198310133091511 contributor: fullname: J Kassier – volume: 306 start-page: 978 issue: 9 year: 2011 ident: 3410_CR22 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1234 contributor: fullname: DA Cook – volume: 13 start-page: e0203851 issue: 9 year: 2018 ident: 3410_CR30 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203851 contributor: fullname: A Middeke – volume: 24 start-page: 413 issue: 5 year: 1990 ident: 3410_CR45 publication-title: Med Educ doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02650.x contributor: fullname: G Bordage – volume: 85 start-page: 1589 issue: 10 year: 2010 ident: 3410_CR13 publication-title: Acad Med doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13 contributor: fullname: DA Cook – volume: 36 start-page: 365 year: 2014 ident: 3410_CR53 publication-title: Comput Hum Behav doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.041 contributor: fullname: BD Homer – volume: 23 start-page: 1005 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 3410_CR42 publication-title: Adv Health Sci Educ doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9830-5 contributor: fullname: G Bordage – volume: 54 start-page: 786 issue: 9 year: 2020 ident: 3410_CR21 publication-title: Med Educ doi: 10.1111/medu.14152 contributor: fullname: J Lee – volume: 70 start-page: 194 issue: 3 year: 1995 ident: 3410_CR26 publication-title: Acad Med doi: 10.1097/00001888-199503000-00009 contributor: fullname: B Page – volume: 50 start-page: 986 issue: 10 year: 2016 ident: 3410_CR11 publication-title: Med Educ doi: 10.1111/medu.12795 contributor: fullname: WC McGaghie – volume: 22 start-page: 276 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 3410_CR24 publication-title: Biochem Med (Zagreb) doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031 contributor: fullname: ML McHugh – volume: 122 start-page: 334 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 3410_CR36 publication-title: Acta Psychiatr Scand doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01567.x contributor: fullname: K Kahl – volume: 6 start-page: 332 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 3410_CR16 publication-title: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learning doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000514 contributor: fullname: CL Richardson – volume: 17 start-page: 1 issue: 11 year: 2015 ident: 3410_CR47 publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/jmir.5035 contributor: fullname: R Kleinert – volume: 29 start-page: 150 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 3410_CR39 publication-title: Acad Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.028 contributor: fullname: YH Qin – volume: 4 start-page: 518 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 3410_CR46 publication-title: Knowl Manag E-Learn contributor: fullname: O Aghili – volume: 18 start-page: 297 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 3410_CR35 publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1395-8 contributor: fullname: A Isaza-Restrepo – volume: 17 start-page: 165 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 3410_CR32 publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1004-2 contributor: fullname: F Schubach – volume: 93 start-page: 742 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 3410_CR27 publication-title: Acad Med: J Assoc Am Med Coll doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001961 contributor: fullname: S Kim – volume: 22 issue: 8 year: 2020 ident: 3410_CR18 publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/16504 contributor: fullname: A Vallée – volume: 34 start-page: 833 issue: 10 year: 2012 ident: 3410_CR50 publication-title: Med Teach doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.706727 contributor: fullname: AL Kalet – volume: 15 start-page: 11 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 3410_CR9 publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3 contributor: fullname: AA Kononowicz – volume: 37 start-page: 1 issue: 7 year: 2020 ident: 3410_CR20 publication-title: GMS Journal for Medical Education contributor: fullname: IS Hege – volume: 12 start-page: 189 issue: 4 year: 2000 ident: 3410_CR43 publication-title: Teach Learn Med doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1204_5 contributor: fullname: B Charlin – volume: 31 start-page: e431 issue: 9 year: 2009 ident: 3410_CR33 publication-title: Med Teach doi: 10.1080/01421590903095502 contributor: fullname: T Raupach – volume: 43 start-page: 303 issue: 4 year: 2009 ident: 3410_CR5 publication-title: Med Educ doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03286.x contributor: fullname: DA Cook – volume: 6 start-page: e1000097 issue: 7 year: 2009 ident: 3410_CR23 publication-title: PLoS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 contributor: fullname: D Moher – volume: 15 start-page: 988 issue: 11 year: 2008 ident: 3410_CR6 publication-title: Acad Emerg Med doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x contributor: fullname: KA Ericsson – volume: 19 start-page: 25940 year: 2014 ident: 3410_CR41 publication-title: Med Educ Online doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.25940 contributor: fullname: B Wu – volume: 21 start-page: e14676 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: 3410_CR15 publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/14676 contributor: fullname: AA Kononowicz – volume: 300 start-page: 1181 issue: 10 year: 2008 ident: 3410_CR14 publication-title: J Am Med Assoc doi: 10.1001/jama.300.10.1181 contributor: fullname: DA Cook – volume: 47 start-page: 99 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 3410_CR28 publication-title: Intern Med J doi: 10.1111/imj.13304 contributor: fullname: M Sobocan – volume: 7 start-page: e13028 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 3410_CR29 publication-title: Jmir Serious Games doi: 10.2196/13028 contributor: fullname: SH Chon – volume: 20 start-page: 245 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 3410_CR34 publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02168-4 contributor: fullname: R Plackett – volume: 194 start-page: 89 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 3410_CR44 publication-title: Am J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.035 contributor: fullname: AL Kalet – volume: 27 start-page: 10 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 3410_CR10 publication-title: Med Teach doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924 contributor: fullname: S Barry Issenberg – volume: 21 start-page: 189 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 3410_CR37 publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02591-1 contributor: fullname: T Raupach – ident: 3410_CR2 |
SSID | ssj0017831 |
Score | 2.478588 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of... Background Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited... BACKGROUNDUse of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited... Abstract Background Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 365 |
SubjectTerms | Beliefs, opinions and attitudes Clinical Competence Clinical decision making Clinical Reasoning Cognition & reasoning Cognitive ability Computer Assisted Instruction Computer simulation COVID-19 Curricula Decision-making Distance learning Educational Needs Educational technology Equipment and supplies Evaluation Health education Humans Intervention Medical education Medical students Methods Online tutorials Patients Problem Solving Reasoning Reproducibility of Results Skills Students, Medical Systematic review Teaching Teaching Methods Technology application Thinking Skills Virtual patient |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQD4gLovwGCjISEgdkNbGdOOZWEFWFVE5U6s2KHRtWLAlqtqjHnnkDXo8nYcZ2lo04cOGykWKvlMz_eGa-EPJCKdeokneMc98wGZrAWtEJBr7U9hAfKN3jvPPph-bkTL4_r893PvWFPWEJHjgR7hD8s69cQOA3LXkIuuHcCbCpDiIFHlK2XvI5mcr1A9WKah6RaZvDCU9bNMPO9RLMdsmuFm4oovX_bZN3nNKyYXLHAx3fIbdz6EiP0iPvkxt-uEtunubi-D3yA1hOU39GNmF0DBQb2z_R76sLHBShGUaV-rmvA-5txnE9wS9dxQMGT7-m4g2dEu7l9Ov6J50nKCk2sccjXDp9Wa3X02va0T9w0DSNwtwnZ8fvPr49YflTC8xJLTasrSGzEKqTcIUAwfvG1la0vQJiBy4dorDZ3nZYdhNCudLqvuVVr2uhdCeDeED2hnHwjwi1VtV9JevSWimxzue45kHXVnchKNUV5NVMefMtIWqYmIm0jUl8MsAnE_lkrgryBpmz3Ylo2PEGyIjJMmL-JSMFeYmsNaizwD_X5dEDeGBEvzJHYPYgc4PItSAHi52ga265PAuHybo-GQhxgDoNePmCPN8u4z-xf23w42XcIxVkxkIU5GGSpe0rCaQ5RL4FUQspW7zzcmVYfY5I4EAsiKDLx_-DSE_ILR4VpGaVOCB7m4tL_xQCro19FnXrN8w9KHg priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Coronavirus Research Database dbid: COVID link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwELaglRAX_imBgoyExAG5TWwnjrmgUqgKUuFCUW9W7MRl1SUpmyyqOHHmDXg9noSZxNk2IHHgkkixI9nJ55nx_Hwm5IlSLlMxLxjnVcakzzzLRSEY6FJbgn2gdIn1zgfvsv1D-fYoPQoOtzakVY4ysRfUZePQR74NiiRLkew8eXH6heGpURhdDUdoXCbrAkwHQPj67vuPb16t4ggqF8lYKpNn2y16XTTDDPYYxHfMzibqqGft_1s2X1BO08TJC5po7zox4xyGBJSTrWVnt9y3P-gd_3-SN8i1YKTSnQFVN8mlqr5FrhyEMPxt8gPARYdMkCAsaeMpptAf06-zBZak0EDYSqsxgwSedU0zb-FKZ70ro6KfhzARbQeGzfbX9590rNWkmC7fO4tpezKbz9vntKDnxNN0KLq5Qw73Xn_Y3WfhUAfmpBYdy1PYwwhVSLiDKVJVmU2tyEvFufNcOuR7s6UtMMAnhHKx1WXOk1KnQulCenGXrNVNXd0j1FqVlolMY2ulxIii45p7nVpdeK9UEZFn4781pwN3h-n3PHlmBiQYQILpkWDOIvISf_-qJ_Ju9w-axbEJy9iAtVglziMNoZbce53BsAVoeAd2K_dxRJ4ieAxKB0CIK0KRAwwYebbMDghY2COCjRyRzUlPWNVu2jwixASp0ppzeETk8aoZ38RMubpqln0fqWAPLkRENga0rqYk8JuDjR0RNcHxZM7Tlnr2qecch48Ftnp8_9_DekCu8n5xpSwRm2StWyyrh2C0dfZRWJm_AVJ5Rcs priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Open Access Journals dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwELaqIlW9oPIfWpCRkDggQ2I7cYyEUEFUFdJyYqXerNixy6pLApstKjfOvAGvx5Mw4yTbRvTEJYfYlpL58Xy2Zz4T8lQpV6iUV4xzXzAZisBKUQkGsdTWgA-UrrHeefaxOJ7LDyf5yRYZrzsaBNhdu7TD-6Tmq-WLi28_3oDDv44OXxYvO9xL0Qzz0lOYlFMGmPIGh8iIKV4zeXmqoEqRjYUz147bJTsQf3PEIZM4Fen8_520r0StaUbllRB1tEduDtiSHvbGcIts-eY22ZkNp-d3yC-wCdoncAxzHG0Dxcz3U_p9scJKEjrwrFI_Jn7Au3XbLjt40kXcgfD0S3-6Q7ueGLP78_M3HUssKWa5xz1e2p0tlsvuFa3oJV807Wtl7pL50ftP747ZcBcDc1KLNStBLIBkKoniyXLvC5tbUdaKcxe4dEjTZmtb4bmcEMqlVtclz2qdC6UrGcQ9st20jX9AqLUqrzOZp9ZKiQeBjmsedG51FYJSVUKej5I3X3vKDROXKmVhepUZUJmJKjMXCXmLytn0RLrs-KJdnZrB-wyAPJ-5gOyBWvIQdAGfLSAwO4CbPKQJeYaqNWhmoD9XDbUJ8MFIj2UOYV6EpR1A24QcTHqCM7pp82gcZrRlAxgIpFMADEjIk00zjsQEt8a357GPVLB0FiIh93tb2vzSaJIJURMrm_zztKVZfI5U4SAsgNjpw_8euU92eXSQnGXigGyvV-f-EcCwtX0cfesv7lQyMQ priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students' clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550085 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2666536471 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2664791733 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9098350 https://doaj.org/article/562e1cf5103942ff9622c3847c1122f0 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwEB61RUJcEP8NlJWRkDigdBPbiWNu3aVVQdpSVRRVXKzYicuK3aTabBFHzrwBr8eTMHaSpRE3Ll4pdiTHM-MZe775FuClECYVEc1DSss05Da1YcZyFqIv1QXGB0IWrt55dpIen_P3F8nFFiR9LYwH7Rs9368Wy_1q_sVjK6-WZtzjxMans6mMJAYO0XgbttH99kf0LnUgMhb31TFZOm7cRYsMHWg9wh07Ch3zNDrZxAUbA2fkOfv_3ZlvuKYhbPKGHzq6B3e7AJIctBO9D1tl9QBuz7oU-UP4iYInLUqj28hIbYmDt1-Sb_OVKxchHZkqKXt0Bz5b1_WiwZbM_TVDSZZtCoc0Lftl8_vHL9LXURIHZfcXuaT5Ol8smjckJ39JoUlbEPMIzo8OP06Pw-4PF0LDJVuHGS4Lhis5d8sTJ2WZ6kSzrBCUGku5cVxsutC5S74xJkykZZHRuJAJEzLnlj2Gnaquyl0gWoukiHkSac25y_YZKqmViZa5tULkAbzuV15dtbwayp9HslS1IlMoMuVFpr4HMHHC2Yx0nNj-Qb26VJ1mKIzkythYRxEoObVWpjhtht7XYExJbRTAKyda5SwX5WfyrgABJ-w4sNQBbn54fsP4NYC9wUi0ODPs7pVDdRbfKAx0cHVS9PUBvNh0uzcdiq0q62s_hgs8HzMWwJNWlzaf1KtkAGKgZYNvHvageXg-8M4cnv73m8_gDvUGkoQx24Od9eq6fI6x1lqP0MIuxAhuTQ5PTs_wd_rh07u3I39zge2MZ9ieTT6PvA3-AQbDMWY |
link.rule.ids | 230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,12056,21388,24318,27924,27925,31719,31720,33744,33745,38516,43310,43805,43895,53791,53793 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwELZgKwGX8lsIFDASEgeUNrGdOOaCSqHaQrdcWtSbFTtxWXW7KZtdVHHizBvwejwJM4mzbUDiwCWRYkeyk88z4_n5TMhzKW0qI5aHjJVpKFzqwoznPARdagqwD6QqsN55tJ8OD8X7o-TIO9xqn1bZycRGUBeVRR_5JiiSNEGy8_j12ZcQT43C6Ko_QuMqWcFTvJMBWdn--Gn37TKOIDMed6UyWbpZo9dFhZjBHoH4jsLznjpqWPv_ls2XlFM_cfKSJtq5SXQ3hzYB5WRjMTcb9tsf9I7_P8lbZNUbqXSrRdVtcqWc3iHXRj4Mf5f8AHDRNhPEC0taOYop9Mf063iGJSnUE7bSsssggWfzqprUcKXjxpVR0tM2TETrlmGz_vX9J-1qNSmmyzfOYlqfjCeT-hXN6QXxNG2Lbu6Rw513B9vD0B_qEFqh-DzMEtjDcJkLuIMpUpapSQzPCsmYdUxY5HszhckxwMe5tJFRRcbiQiVcqlw4vkYG02paPiDUGJkUsUgiY4TAiKJlijmVGJU7J2UekJfdv9VnLXeHbvY8WapbJGhAgm6QoM8D8gZ__7In8m43D6rZsfbLWIO1WMbWIQ2hEsw5lcKwOWh4C3Yrc1FAXiB4NEoHQIjNfZEDDBh5tvQWCFjYI4KNHJD1Xk9Y1bbf3CFEe6lS6wt4BOTZshnfxEy5aVktmj5Cwh6c84Dcb9G6nBLHbw42dkBkD8e9OfdbpuPPDec4fCyw1aOH_x7WU3J9eDDa03u7-x8ekRusWWhJGPN1MpjPFuVjMODm5olfpb8BzbVIuw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwELagSBWXiv-mFDASEgeUbmI7ccytFFblZ6seqNSbFTtxidhNVpst4siZN-D1eBJmnGTZiBuXHGJHcjwznrHnm8-EvJDSpjJiechYmYbCpS7MeM5D8KWmgPhAqgLrnWdn6emF-HCZXG5d9eVB-9ZUR_V8cVRXXzy2crmwkwEnNjmfnahIQeAQTZaFm9wktxIOSjZs1PsEgsx4PNTIZOmkxeMWFSJ0PYJ1OwqRfxpcbYIhx8gleeb-f9fnLQc1Bk9ueaPpHbLXh5H0uBvuXXKjrO-R3VmfKL9PfoL4aYfV6Jcz2jiKIPcr-q1aYdEI7SlVaTlgPODdumnmLTxp5Q8bSrroEjm07Tgw298_ftGhmpIioN0f59L2azWft69pTv9SQ9OuLOYBuZi--3xyGvbXLoRWKL4OM5gWCFpygdMTJ2WZmsTwrJCMWceERUY2U5gcU3CcSxsZVWQsLhTKIReOPyQ7dVOX-4QaI5MiFklkjBCY87NMMacSo3LnpMwD8mqYeb3s2DW035Vkqe5EpkFk2otMfw_IGxTOpicyY_sXzepK9_qhIZ4rY-uQKFAJ5pxKYdgcfLCFyJK5KCAvUbQa7RfkZ_O-DAEGjExY-hiWQNjFQRQbkMNRT7A7O24elEP3dt9qCHdgdlLw-AF5vmnGLxHLVpfNte8jJOySOQ_Io06XNr80qGRA5EjLRv88bgEj8azgvVEc_PeXz8ju-dup_vT-7ONjcpt5W0nCmB-SnfXqunwCwdfaPPVm9gfmiy7X |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+effectiveness+of+using+virtual+patient+educational+tools+to+improve+medical+students%E2%80%99+clinical+reasoning+skills%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=BMC+medical+education&rft.au=Plackett%2C+Ruth&rft.au=Kassianos%2C+Angelos+P.&rft.au=Mylan%2C+Sophie&rft.au=Kambouri%2C+Maria&rft.date=2022-05-13&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1472-6920&rft.volume=22&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12909-022-03410-x&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35550085&rft.externalDBID=PMC9098350 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6920&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6920&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6920&client=summon |