A New Philosophy for International Law
As many philosophers have pointed out, there is mystery in the bare assumption that promising creates obligation. How can an individual change his moral situation just by speaking a runic phrase? If we want to explain why promises do create moral obligations, we must point to different, more basic m...
Saved in:
Published in | Philosophy & public affairs Vol. 41; no. 1; pp. 2 - 30 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, NJ
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | As many philosophers have pointed out, there is mystery in the bare assumption that promising creates obligation. How can an individual change his moral situation just by speaking a runic phrase? If we want to explain why promises do create moral obligations, we must point to different, more basic moral principles that a promise invokes. Philosophers have suggested a variety of such principles. We must look for similar, more basic principles within international law. Dworkin posits that if law is understood as a special part of political morality, and if it serves its community well, its doctrines will crystallize over time. Its roots in political morality will grow less prominent--though will be available when needed--in ordinary legal argument. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:PAPA12008 ark:/67375/WNG-LK54D02X-5 istex:D570BA67315D0310539FBDAE517FBEC56D42DA66 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 |
ISSN: | 0048-3915 1088-4963 |
DOI: | 10.1111/papa.12008 |