A phase III, randomized, placebo‐controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective To assess the efficacy/safety of the B lymphocyte stimulator inhibitor belimumab plus standard therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods In a phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial, 819 antinuclear antibo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) Vol. 63; no. 12; pp. 3918 - 3930
Main Authors Furie, Richard, Petri, Michelle, Zamani, Omid, Cervera, Ricard, Wallace, Daniel J., Tegzová, Dana, Sanchez‐Guerrero, Jorge, Schwarting, Andreas, Merrill, Joan T., Chatham, W. Winn, Stohl, William, Ginzler, Ellen M., Hough, Douglas R., Zhong, Z. John, Freimuth, William, van Vollenhoven, Ronald F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.12.2011
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To assess the efficacy/safety of the B lymphocyte stimulator inhibitor belimumab plus standard therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods In a phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial, 819 antinuclear antibody–positive or anti–double‐stranded DNA–positive SLE patients with scores ≥6 on the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA) version of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 1 mg/kg belimumab, 10 mg/kg belimumab, or placebo intravenously on days 0, 14, and 28 and then every 28 days for 72 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the SLE Responder Index (SRI) response rate at week 52 (an SRI response was defined as a ≥4‐point reduction in SELENA–SLEDAI score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG] A organ domain score and no more than 1 new BILAG B score, and no worsening in physician's global assessment score versus baseline). Results Belimumab at 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy met the primary efficacy end point, generating a significantly greater SRI response at week 52 compared with placebo (43.2% versus 33.5%; P = 0.017). The rate with 1 mg/kg belimumab was 40.6% (P = 0.089). Response rates at week 76 were 32.4%, 39.1%, and 38.5% with placebo, 1 mg/kg belimumab, and 10 mg/kg belimumab, respectively. In post hoc sensitivity analyses evaluating higher SELENA–SLEDAI score thresholds, 10 mg/kg belimumab achieved better discrimination at weeks 52 and 76. Risk of severe flares over 76 weeks (based on the modified SLE Flare Index) was reduced with 1 mg/kg belimumab (34%) (P = 0.023) and 10 mg/kg belimumab (23%) (P = 0.13). Serious and severe adverse events, including infections, laboratory abnormalities, malignancies, and deaths, were comparable across groups. Conclusion Belimumab plus standard therapy significantly improved SRI response rate, reduced SLE disease activity and severe flares, and was generally well tolerated in SLE.
Bibliography:Dr. Merrill has received consulting fees and grant support from Human Genome Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline (less than $10,000 each); she has served as a paid consultant to the investment analysts Gerson Lehrman Group, Leerink Swann, and Sionna (less than $10,000 each).
Dr. Furie has received research or grant support, travel support, and payment for review activities, board membership, and consultancy from Human Genome Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline (more than $10,000 each) and is a member of the BLISS‐76 steering committee; he has served as a paid consultant to the investment analysts Gerson Lehrman Group, Guidepoint Global, and Lazard Ltd. (less than $10,000 each).
ClinicalTrials.gov
Dr. Wallace has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Human Genome Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline (less than $10,000 each).
Dr. Cervera has received payment for board membership and consultancy from Human Genome Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline (less than $10,000 each) and is a member of the BLISS‐76 steering committee.
Dr. Stohl has received research or grant support and consulting fees from Human Genome Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline (less than $10,000 each).
identifier: NCT00410384.
Dr. Chatham has received research or grant support and travel support from Human Genome Sciences (less than $10,000).
Dr. Petri has received research or grant support, travel support, and payment for review activities, board membership, and consultancy from Human Genome Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline (more than $10,000 each) and is a member of the BLISS‐76 steering committee; she has served as a paid consultant to the investment analyst Gerson Lehrman Group (less than $10,000).
Dr. Ginzler has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Human Genome Sciences, Genentech, Vifor Pharma, MedImmune, and Wyeth (less than $10,000 each); she has served as a paid consultant to the investment analysts Guidepoint Global and Gerson Lehrman Group (less than $10,000 each).
Drs. Hough, Zhong, and Freimuth own stock or stock options in Human Genome Sciences.
Dr. van Vollenhoven has received consulting fees and honoraria from Human Genome Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline (less than $10,000 each) and is a member of the BLISS‐76 steering committee.
ISSN:0004-3591
2326-5191
1529-0131
1529-0131
2326-5205
DOI:10.1002/art.30613