Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study
Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have n...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 1 - 793 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
24.10.2023
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Abstract
Background
Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier.
Methods
Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system.
Results
The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (
Z
: − 1.393,
p
= 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (
t
(35) = 0.29,
p
= 0.016,
p
< 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group.
Conclusions
For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BackgroundPeritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier.MethodsBetween December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system.ResultsThe mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: − 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group.ConclusionsFor the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. BACKGROUNDPeritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier.METHODSBetween December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland's total active motion grading system.RESULTSThe mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: - 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group.CONCLUSIONSFor the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. Methods Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system. Results The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: − 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. Conclusions For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. Methods Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland's total active motion grading system. Results The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: - 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. Conclusions For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. Keywords: Flexor tendon repair, Flexor zone 2, Tendon adhesion, Anti-adhesion barrier, Collagen, Collagen sheet Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. Methods Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system. Results The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( Z : − 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group ( t (35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. Conclusions For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland's total active motion grading system. The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: - 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. |
ArticleNumber | 793 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Yaşar, Burak |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Burak surname: Yaşar fullname: Yaşar, Burak |
BookMark | eNptks9vFCEUxyemJrbVf8ATiRcvU4Hhx-DFNE3VJk28aPRGGHjMspmFFdjW-tdLu426xnCAPL7fD-_x3kl3FFOErntJ8Bkho3hTyIDJ2GM69JhRxfrhSXdMJFO9VOrb0V_nZ91JKWuMOeYjO-6-XkYbsl1CnFGF6FJEGbYmZFRCBXQb6grZtCxmhojKCqCiEJFf4EfK6GdLAtG3zVFzKluwNdwAKnXn7p53T71ZCrx43E-7L-8vP1987K8_fbi6OL_uLVO09t5RMilhiMVWTRi4YJZO1HPHOfdMOMMHyoWVzAPHEstRCPCKjc4p4rwfTrurPdcls9bbHDYm3-lkgn4IpDxrk2uwC2jBpaXSDpLAyCaAybuJCCJAMK_8BI31bs_a7qYNOAuxZrMcQA9vYljpOd1ognlLSfFGeP1IyOn7DkrVm1AstO-LkHZF03EkklBOWJO--ke6Trsc2181lcJYSoHFH9VsWgUh-tQetvdQfS5lazfFVDbV2X9UbTnYBNua5EOLHxjo3mBb30oG_7tIgvX9QOn9QOlm0A8DpYfhF6NPwAg |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.019 10.2106/JBJS.K.00988 10.1177/1753193412458646 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.10.003 10.1016/j.jss.2009.10.010 10.1177/1753193408091570 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.037 10.1007/s00238-014-1002-0 10.1177/1753193417691390 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.007 10.1097/00000637-200045010-00017 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0208 10.1177/17531934097321 10.1002/term.284 10.1016/j.hcl.2022.12.001 10.1002/lsm.22066 10.1016/S0363-5023(80)80101-8 10.1007/s00402-022-04506-1 10.1177/1753193411432675 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.004 10.1002/jor.22305 10.1007/s12593-015-0192-4 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90083-F 10.1016/0363-5023(92)90128-C 10.1177/1753193408090758 10.1007/s12593-014-0156-0 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QP 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-023-04294-3 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X7 name: Health & Medical Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1749-799X |
EndPage | 793 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_657c27c371e84beebfdb1616e64f9fbe A770232027 10_1186_s13018_023_04294_3 |
GroupedDBID | --- -5E -5G -A0 -BR 0R~ 29L 2WC 3V. 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACPRK ACRMQ ADBBV ADINQ ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPT ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW ~8M ABVAZ AFGXO AFNRJ 7QP 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-fd21b96a1c0c9b0e564c2b2f5d555f46da53256c74fe50707866ef948dd91dff3 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1749-799X |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 14:55:57 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:29:45 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 08:43:24 EDT 2024 Fri Nov 08 20:53:59 EST 2024 Fri Feb 23 00:21:59 EST 2024 Fri Feb 02 04:39:13 EST 2024 Thu Sep 12 19:12:46 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c492t-fd21b96a1c0c9b0e564c2b2f5d555f46da53256c74fe50707866ef948dd91dff3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594895/ |
PQID | 2890077606 |
PQPubID | 55349 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_657c27c371e84beebfdb1616e64f9fbe pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10594895 proquest_miscellaneous_2881712514 proquest_journals_2890077606 gale_infotracmisc_A770232027 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A770232027 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_04294_3 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-10-24 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-10-24 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2023 text: 2023-10-24 day: 24 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | X Zhou (4294_CR26) 2017; 42 CW Stegink Jansen (4294_CR20) 1993; 18 C Zhao (4294_CR13) 2013; 31 J Håkansson (4294_CR11) 2012; 37 S Liu (4294_CR14) 2013; 19 M Jaibaji (4294_CR6) 2000; 45 L-K Hung (4294_CR12) 2013; 95 C Wirtz (4294_CR18) 2022; 143 MV Karaaltin (4294_CR15) 2013; 38 JW Strickland (4294_CR19) 1980; 5 C Aletto (4294_CR24) 2023; 39 T Ni (4294_CR10) 2012; 44 OA Branford (4294_CR9) 2011; 5 C Savvidou (4294_CR25) 2016; 07 RH Caulfield (4294_CR1) 2008; 33 JB Tang (4294_CR5) 2013; 29 A Momeni (4294_CR21) 2010; 26 H Akbari (4294_CR23) 2016; 07 D Bhavsar (4294_CR8) 2010; 159 FH Peck (4294_CR4) 2004; 57 GL Hoffmann (4294_CR2) 2008; 33 OA Branford (4294_CR7) 2012; 37 JT Hardwicke (4294_CR3) 2014; 39 JB Tang (4294_CR17) 2009; 34 C Fulchignoni (4294_CR27) 2020; 12 EC Francis (4294_CR16) 2014; 37 L Hagberg (4294_CR22) 1992; 17 |
References_xml | – volume: 37 start-page: 2519 year: 2012 ident: 4294_CR11 publication-title: J Hand Surg Am. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.019 contributor: fullname: J Håkansson – volume: 95 year: 2013 ident: 4294_CR12 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00988 contributor: fullname: L-K Hung – volume: 38 start-page: 651 year: 2013 ident: 4294_CR15 publication-title: J Hand Surg (Eur Vol) doi: 10.1177/1753193412458646 contributor: fullname: MV Karaaltin – volume: 57 start-page: 45 year: 2004 ident: 4294_CR4 publication-title: Br J Plast Surg doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.10.003 contributor: fullname: FH Peck – volume: 159 start-page: 765 year: 2010 ident: 4294_CR8 publication-title: J Surg Res doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.10.010 contributor: fullname: D Bhavsar – volume: 33 start-page: 418 year: 2008 ident: 4294_CR2 publication-title: J Hand Surg Eur doi: 10.1177/1753193408091570 contributor: fullname: GL Hoffmann – volume: 39 start-page: 686 year: 2014 ident: 4294_CR3 publication-title: J Hand Surg Am. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.037 contributor: fullname: JT Hardwicke – volume: 37 start-page: 573 year: 2014 ident: 4294_CR16 publication-title: Eur J Plast Surg doi: 10.1007/s00238-014-1002-0 contributor: fullname: EC Francis – volume: 42 start-page: 462 year: 2017 ident: 4294_CR26 publication-title: J Hand Surg (Eur Vol) doi: 10.1177/1753193417691390 contributor: fullname: X Zhou – volume: 29 start-page: 251 year: 2013 ident: 4294_CR5 publication-title: Hand Clin doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.007 contributor: fullname: JB Tang – volume: 45 start-page: 83 year: 2000 ident: 4294_CR6 publication-title: Ann Plast Surg doi: 10.1097/00000637-200045010-00017 contributor: fullname: M Jaibaji – volume: 19 start-page: 529 year: 2013 ident: 4294_CR14 publication-title: Tissue Eng Part A doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0208 contributor: fullname: S Liu – volume: 34 start-page: 137 year: 2009 ident: 4294_CR17 publication-title: J Hand Surg (Eur Vol) doi: 10.1177/17531934097321 contributor: fullname: JB Tang – volume: 5 start-page: 20 year: 2011 ident: 4294_CR9 publication-title: J Tissue Eng Regen Med doi: 10.1002/term.284 contributor: fullname: OA Branford – volume: 39 start-page: 215 year: 2023 ident: 4294_CR24 publication-title: Hand Clin doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2022.12.001 contributor: fullname: C Aletto – volume: 44 start-page: 645 year: 2012 ident: 4294_CR10 publication-title: Lasers Surg Med doi: 10.1002/lsm.22066 contributor: fullname: T Ni – volume: 5 start-page: 537 year: 1980 ident: 4294_CR19 publication-title: J Hand Surg Am doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(80)80101-8 contributor: fullname: JW Strickland – volume: 143 start-page: 1133 year: 2022 ident: 4294_CR18 publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04506-1 contributor: fullname: C Wirtz – volume: 12 start-page: 8668 year: 2020 ident: 4294_CR27 publication-title: Orthop Rev (Pavia). contributor: fullname: C Fulchignoni – volume: 37 start-page: 555 year: 2012 ident: 4294_CR7 publication-title: J Hand Surg Eur doi: 10.1177/1753193411432675 contributor: fullname: OA Branford – volume: 26 start-page: 179 year: 2010 ident: 4294_CR21 publication-title: Hand Clin doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.004 contributor: fullname: A Momeni – volume: 31 start-page: 969 year: 2013 ident: 4294_CR13 publication-title: J Orthop Res doi: 10.1002/jor.22305 contributor: fullname: C Zhao – volume: 07 start-page: 244 year: 2016 ident: 4294_CR23 publication-title: J Hand Microsurg doi: 10.1007/s12593-015-0192-4 contributor: fullname: H Akbari – volume: 18 start-page: 411 year: 1993 ident: 4294_CR20 publication-title: J Hand Surg Am doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90083-F contributor: fullname: CW Stegink Jansen – volume: 17 start-page: 132 year: 1992 ident: 4294_CR22 publication-title: J Hand Surg Am doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(92)90128-C contributor: fullname: L Hagberg – volume: 33 start-page: 412 year: 2008 ident: 4294_CR1 publication-title: J Hand Surg Eur doi: 10.1177/1753193408090758 contributor: fullname: RH Caulfield – volume: 07 start-page: 25 year: 2016 ident: 4294_CR25 publication-title: J Hand Microsurg doi: 10.1007/s12593-014-0156-0 contributor: fullname: C Savvidou |
SSID | ssj0050584 |
Score | 2.3496337 |
Snippet | Abstract
Background
Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in... Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in... Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor... BackgroundPeritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased... BACKGROUNDPeritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased... Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Adhesion Analysis Animal models Anti-adhesion barrier Anti-inflammatory agents Collagen Collagen sheet Flexor tendon repair Flexor zone 2 Hyaluronic acid Injuries Medical records Medical research Medicine, Experimental Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Normal distribution Orthopedics Patients Range of motion Rehabilitation Statistical analysis Student's t-test Surgery Tendon adhesion Tendons Vitamin C |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1NaxYxEA7SkxdRqrhaSwTBg4TuZvPprUpLEfRksbew-Rj7guzKvlso_noz2d3S1YMXr5uEZJ-ZzEw-5gkhb7IO6NQGzkAFyYQBYMZEyZKseadDqKGQPX_-oi4uxacreXXvqS-8EzbTA8_AnSipA9eh1U0ywqfkIfocpaikBFjwqVjf2q6LqdkGZ7duxJoiY9TJPlvqxrDsnxgaYMHajRsqbP1_2-Q_70neczznj8mjJWKkp_NIn5AHqT8k3876sBsxrfE7xV3soadjdiy7keJpMMXdVVpEnPWD7q9Tmuiup_Aj3Q4j_TX0ifL3ucU0DmuqJS1Es0_J5fnZ148XbHkjgQVh-cQg8sZb1TWhDtbXSSoRuOcgo5QShIqdbHNUE7SADD9S-yiVwAoTo20iQPuMHPS51-eEKqhBBA_QmSh0Ssa0XYbdRs3bGMFX5N0Kmfs5U2G4soQwys0AuwywKwC7tiIfENW7mkhjXT5k4bpFuO5fwq3IW5SJw8mWJRC6JWcgDxhpq9yp1rlL3L-pyNGmZp4kYVu8StUtk3Tv8IwV2YxqVZHXd8XYEi-e9Wm4wTqm0RgEioqYjTZs_mxb0u-uC1F3U8hwrHzxP7B4SR7iU_foN7k4IgfTeJNe5YBo8sdF938DVCkLuA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9UwFA969-KLKCpWp0QQfJCwNs1XfZFN7hiCQ8Th3kLzcbYLo529HYh_vTm57bQKvjYJJz3fOUl-IeR10gEda88ZKC-ZMADMmCBZlCVvtfclZLDnT6fq5Ex8PJfnU8FtOx2rnH1idtSh91gjP8ANMYSeKdX76-8MX43C3dXpCY27ZI-nlUK5IntH69PPX2ZfnMK7EfNVGaMOtsljV4alOMXQEQtWL8JRRu3_1zf_fV7yjwB0_IDcnzJHergT9UNyJ3aPyLd15zcDXm-8oFjN7js6pACzGSjOm2KVlWZRJz2h28sYR7rpKFzFH_1Af_ZdpPxdGjEO_XzlkmbA2cfk7Hj99cMJm95KYF40fGQQeOUa1Va-9I0ro1TCc8dBBiklCBVaWafsxmsBSQwI8aNUhEaYEJoqANRPyKpLVJ8SqqAE4R1Aa4LQMRpTt7WumqB5HQK4grydWWavd5AYNi8ljLI7BtvEYJsZbOuCHCFXb3sinHX-0A8XdrIOq6T2XPtEJRrhYnQQXEpFVVQCGnCxIG9QJhaNLknAt9PdgTRhhK-yh1onkljHKcj-omcyFr9snqVqJ2Pd2t-qVZBXt804Eg-gdbG_wT6m0pgMioKYhTYs_mzZ0m0uM2B3lUFxGvns_9Sfk3v4mD1GRi72yWocbuKLlPKM7uWk178ABEYDQg priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access(OpenAccess) dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA_revEiiorVVSIIHiTapvmqILLKLougJx_uLTRfuw-Wdu3rwupf70xe-7C6R69NQtLfzGQmH_MLIS9BB3SsPWdJecmESYkZEySLsuSt9r5Mmez5y1d1shKfT-XpHpmfO5oA3Ny4tMP3pFbDxZvrHz8_gMG_zwZv1NsNzMOVYeB9GE6vgtW3yG0uYKWOV_nE7lQBnL0Rc-LMje0Wzilz-P87U_99e_IPd3R8j9yd4kh6uBX8fbIXuwfk-1Hn1wMmO55R3NvuOzqAu1kPFM-IKe650ix40Bq6OY9xpOuOpot43Q_0V99Fyt9Bi3Ho5wRMmulnH5LV8dG3TydsejmBedHwkaXAK9eotvKlb1wZpRKeO55kkFImoUIra4h1vBYJhIKEP0rF1AgTQlOFlOpHZL-DXh8TqlKZhHcptSYIHaMxdVvrqgma1yEkV5DXM2T2ckuQYfPCwii7BdgCwDYDbOuCfERUdzWR3Dp_6IczO9mKVVJ7rj30Eo1wMboUHASmKiqRmuRiQV6hTCwqBUjAt1MmAQwYyazsodbQJe7qFORgURNMxy-LZ6naWfMsnrwix1GpCvJiV4wt8TpaF_srrGMqjaGhKIhZaMPiz5Yl3fo803dXmSKnkU_-BxZPyR2OCgzelIsDsj8OV_EZhEmje551_zdJSRKy priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2890077606 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2881712514 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10594895 https://doaj.org/article/657c27c371e84beebfdb1616e64f9fbe |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZJeumltLSlbpNFhUIPRVk_9HJvm7AhLGwIbUP3JqxXYkjs4HWg9NdnpLVD3d56scGSkDwz0oxGM58Q-gQyIFxhcuK5YYRK74mUlhHH0rwSxqQ-gj2vL_j5FV1t2GYP8TEXJgbtG10fN7d3x019E2Mr7-_MfIwTm1-uT7MIMlKy-T7aBwkd9-i79RdUuqRjeozk8y2s0pkkoJtIWHwpKSYqKCL1_7se_x0j-YfSOXuJXgzWIl7sRvUK7bnmNfq5bEzdhZTGaxw82G2DO1AqdYfDSTAOnlUc2Quygbc3zvW4brC_db_aDv9uG4fzr9Ci79oxzRJHkNk36Ops-eP0nAz3IxBDy7wn3uaZLnmVmdSUOnWMU5Pr3DPLGPOU24oVYNEYQT2QPsD6cO48UM7aMrPeF2_RQQO9vkOY-9RTo72vpKXCOSmLqhBZaUVeWOt1gr6MJFP3OxgMFbcPkqsdgRUQWEUCqyJBJ4GqTzUDhHX80HbXamCk4kyYXBjoxUmqndPeajA_uePUl167BH0OPFFhogEHTDXkC8CAA2SVWggBXQbfTYIOJzVhgphp8chVNUzQrQrnqwHJKOUJ-vhUHFqGoLPGtQ-hjsxEMABpguREGiZ_Ni0BmY0g3aOMvv__ph_Q83C5fdCUOT1EB3334I7ABOr1DOR-I2bo2WKx-r6C98ny4vLbLDoU4LmmchbnxCMiRQ9z |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,730,783,787,867,888,2109,12068,21400,24330,27936,27937,31731,31732,33756,33757,43322,43817,53804,53806 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1baxQxFA7aPuhLUVScWjWC4IOEziW38UVa2bJqu4i02LcwubULMtPObkH89Z6TnamOgq-ThJM595wkXwh5DTqgQuVKFqUTjOsYmdZesCDyslHO5TGBPZ8s5PyMfzoX50PBbTUcqxx9YnLUvnNYI9_HDTGEnsnl-6trhq9G4e7q8ITGXbKNUFWw-No-nC2-fB19MYR3zcerMlrur8BjF5pBnGLoiDmrJuEoofb_65v_Pi_5RwA6ekB2hsyRHmxE_ZDcCe0j8m3WumWP1xsvKFazu5b2EGCWPcV5U6yy0iRq0BO6ugxhTZctjd_Dj66nP7s20PIdjFj33XjlkibA2cfk7Gh2-mHOhrcSmON1uWbRl4WtZVO43NU2D0JyV9oyCi-EiFz6RlSQ3TjFI4gBIX6kDLHm2vu68DFWT8hWC1SfEipjHrmzMTbacxWC1lVTqaL2qqy8jzYjb0eWmasNJIZJSwktzYbBBhhsEoNNlZFD5OptT4SzTh-6_sIM1mGkUK5UDqgEzW0INnoLqagMksc62pCRNygTg0YHEnDNcHcAJozwVeZAKSCJdZyM7E16grG4afMoVTMY68r8Vq2MvLptxpF4AK0N3Q32AfXCZJBnRE-0YfJn05Z2eZkAu4sEilOL3f9Tf0nuzU9Pjs3xx8XnZ-Q-PmyPUbLke2Rr3d-E55D-rO2LQcd_AXmnBjw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFLagSIgLiwARKGAkJA4oM4njLdxK6agsrXqgohIHK97aqG0yymQk1F_PsyepSLn1Gtuyne9tsd_7gtB7kAHhCkNSzw1LqfQ-ldKy1LGMVMKYzEey54NDvn9Mv52wkyGrcjWkVTZG17Pm4nLW1Gcxt3J5aeZjntj86GA3jyQjJZsvrZ_fRfdAaTM-fqlvrDA4dknHIhnJ5yuw1blMwUOlwQTTtJg4osjX_79Vvpkp-Y_rWTxCv8dFbzJOzmfrXs_M1Q0-x9vt6jF6OESkeGfT5wm645qn6NdeY-oulE2e4nBK3ja4A8dVdzjcNuNweoujCIH84dWZcz2uG-wv3J-2w1dt4zD5BCP6rh1LOXEksn2Gjhd7P3f30-EfDKmhJelTb0muS17lJjOlzhzj1BBNPLOMMU-5rVgBUZMR1AO8gTqIc-dhH9aWufW-eI62Gpj1BcLcZ54a7X0lLRXOSVlUhchLK0hhrdcJ-jgCopYbqg0VP1EkVxv4FMCnInyqSNDngNl1z0CTHR-03akaXqviTBgiDMziJNXOaW81hLjccepLr12CPgTEVVBmwNdUQ00CLDjQYqkdIWDKcD6UoO1JT1BCM20eZUYNRmClwh1uYEvKeILeXTeHkSGxrXHtOvSRuQhBJk2QnMjaZGfTFpCgSAQ-SszL2w99i-4ffVmoH18Pv79CD0jQD3DMhG6jrb5bu9cQcfX6TVStv2szLkc |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Encircling+tendon+repair+site+with+collagen+sheet+in+flexor+zone+2%3A+retrospective+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+surgery+and+research&rft.au=Burak+Ya%C5%9Far&rft.date=2023-10-24&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13018-023-04294-3&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_657c27c371e84beebfdb1616e64f9fbe |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |