Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study

Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 1 - 793
Main Author Yaşar, Burak
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central Ltd 24.10.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. Methods Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system. Results The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( Z : − 1.393, p  = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group ( t (35) = 0.29, p  = 0.016, p  < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. Conclusions For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended.
AbstractList BackgroundPeritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier.MethodsBetween December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system.ResultsThe mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: − 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group.ConclusionsFor the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended.
BACKGROUNDPeritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier.METHODSBetween December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland's total active motion grading system.RESULTSThe mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: - 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group.CONCLUSIONSFor the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended.
Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. Methods Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system. Results The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: − 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. Conclusions For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended.
Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. Methods Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland's total active motion grading system. Results The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: - 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. Conclusions For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. Keywords: Flexor tendon repair, Flexor zone 2, Tendon adhesion, Anti-adhesion barrier, Collagen, Collagen sheet
Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. Methods Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system. Results The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( Z : − 1.393, p  = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group ( t (35) = 0.29, p  = 0.016, p  < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. Conclusions For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended.
Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland's total active motion grading system. The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: - 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended.
ArticleNumber 793
Audience Academic
Author Yaşar, Burak
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Burak
  surname: Yaşar
  fullname: Yaşar, Burak
BookMark eNptks9vFCEUxyemJrbVf8ATiRcvU4Hhx-DFNE3VJk28aPRGGHjMspmFFdjW-tdLu426xnCAPL7fD-_x3kl3FFOErntJ8Bkho3hTyIDJ2GM69JhRxfrhSXdMJFO9VOrb0V_nZ91JKWuMOeYjO-6-XkYbsl1CnFGF6FJEGbYmZFRCBXQb6grZtCxmhojKCqCiEJFf4EfK6GdLAtG3zVFzKluwNdwAKnXn7p53T71ZCrx43E-7L-8vP1987K8_fbi6OL_uLVO09t5RMilhiMVWTRi4YJZO1HPHOfdMOMMHyoWVzAPHEstRCPCKjc4p4rwfTrurPdcls9bbHDYm3-lkgn4IpDxrk2uwC2jBpaXSDpLAyCaAybuJCCJAMK_8BI31bs_a7qYNOAuxZrMcQA9vYljpOd1ognlLSfFGeP1IyOn7DkrVm1AstO-LkHZF03EkklBOWJO--ke6Trsc2181lcJYSoHFH9VsWgUh-tQetvdQfS5lazfFVDbV2X9UbTnYBNua5EOLHxjo3mBb30oG_7tIgvX9QOn9QOlm0A8DpYfhF6NPwAg
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.019
10.2106/JBJS.K.00988
10.1177/1753193412458646
10.1016/j.bjps.2003.10.003
10.1016/j.jss.2009.10.010
10.1177/1753193408091570
10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.037
10.1007/s00238-014-1002-0
10.1177/1753193417691390
10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.007
10.1097/00000637-200045010-00017
10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0208
10.1177/17531934097321
10.1002/term.284
10.1016/j.hcl.2022.12.001
10.1002/lsm.22066
10.1016/S0363-5023(80)80101-8
10.1007/s00402-022-04506-1
10.1177/1753193411432675
10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.004
10.1002/jor.22305
10.1007/s12593-015-0192-4
10.1016/0363-5023(93)90083-F
10.1016/0363-5023(92)90128-C
10.1177/1753193408090758
10.1007/s12593-014-0156-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7QP
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PIMPY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13018-023-04294-3
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic


CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X7
  name: Health & Medical Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1749-799X
EndPage 793
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_657c27c371e84beebfdb1616e64f9fbe
A770232027
10_1186_s13018_023_04294_3
GroupedDBID ---
-5E
-5G
-A0
-BR
0R~
29L
2WC
3V.
53G
5GY
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ACRMQ
ADBBV
ADINQ
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C24
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPT
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
ABVAZ
AFGXO
AFNRJ
7QP
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-fd21b96a1c0c9b0e564c2b2f5d555f46da53256c74fe50707866ef948dd91dff3
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 1749-799X
IngestDate Tue Oct 22 14:55:57 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 17 21:29:45 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 08:43:24 EDT 2024
Fri Nov 08 20:53:59 EST 2024
Fri Feb 23 00:21:59 EST 2024
Fri Feb 02 04:39:13 EST 2024
Thu Sep 12 19:12:46 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c492t-fd21b96a1c0c9b0e564c2b2f5d555f46da53256c74fe50707866ef948dd91dff3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594895/
PQID 2890077606
PQPubID 55349
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_657c27c371e84beebfdb1616e64f9fbe
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10594895
proquest_miscellaneous_2881712514
proquest_journals_2890077606
gale_infotracmisc_A770232027
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A770232027
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_04294_3
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-10-24
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-10-24
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-10-24
  day: 24
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
PublicationTitle Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References X Zhou (4294_CR26) 2017; 42
CW Stegink Jansen (4294_CR20) 1993; 18
C Zhao (4294_CR13) 2013; 31
J Håkansson (4294_CR11) 2012; 37
S Liu (4294_CR14) 2013; 19
M Jaibaji (4294_CR6) 2000; 45
L-K Hung (4294_CR12) 2013; 95
C Wirtz (4294_CR18) 2022; 143
MV Karaaltin (4294_CR15) 2013; 38
JW Strickland (4294_CR19) 1980; 5
C Aletto (4294_CR24) 2023; 39
T Ni (4294_CR10) 2012; 44
OA Branford (4294_CR9) 2011; 5
C Savvidou (4294_CR25) 2016; 07
RH Caulfield (4294_CR1) 2008; 33
JB Tang (4294_CR5) 2013; 29
A Momeni (4294_CR21) 2010; 26
H Akbari (4294_CR23) 2016; 07
D Bhavsar (4294_CR8) 2010; 159
FH Peck (4294_CR4) 2004; 57
GL Hoffmann (4294_CR2) 2008; 33
OA Branford (4294_CR7) 2012; 37
JT Hardwicke (4294_CR3) 2014; 39
JB Tang (4294_CR17) 2009; 34
C Fulchignoni (4294_CR27) 2020; 12
EC Francis (4294_CR16) 2014; 37
L Hagberg (4294_CR22) 1992; 17
References_xml – volume: 37
  start-page: 2519
  year: 2012
  ident: 4294_CR11
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Am.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.019
  contributor:
    fullname: J Håkansson
– volume: 95
  year: 2013
  ident: 4294_CR12
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00988
  contributor:
    fullname: L-K Hung
– volume: 38
  start-page: 651
  year: 2013
  ident: 4294_CR15
  publication-title: J Hand Surg (Eur Vol)
  doi: 10.1177/1753193412458646
  contributor:
    fullname: MV Karaaltin
– volume: 57
  start-page: 45
  year: 2004
  ident: 4294_CR4
  publication-title: Br J Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.10.003
  contributor:
    fullname: FH Peck
– volume: 159
  start-page: 765
  year: 2010
  ident: 4294_CR8
  publication-title: J Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.10.010
  contributor:
    fullname: D Bhavsar
– volume: 33
  start-page: 418
  year: 2008
  ident: 4294_CR2
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Eur
  doi: 10.1177/1753193408091570
  contributor:
    fullname: GL Hoffmann
– volume: 39
  start-page: 686
  year: 2014
  ident: 4294_CR3
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Am.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.037
  contributor:
    fullname: JT Hardwicke
– volume: 37
  start-page: 573
  year: 2014
  ident: 4294_CR16
  publication-title: Eur J Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00238-014-1002-0
  contributor:
    fullname: EC Francis
– volume: 42
  start-page: 462
  year: 2017
  ident: 4294_CR26
  publication-title: J Hand Surg (Eur Vol)
  doi: 10.1177/1753193417691390
  contributor:
    fullname: X Zhou
– volume: 29
  start-page: 251
  year: 2013
  ident: 4294_CR5
  publication-title: Hand Clin
  doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.007
  contributor:
    fullname: JB Tang
– volume: 45
  start-page: 83
  year: 2000
  ident: 4294_CR6
  publication-title: Ann Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000637-200045010-00017
  contributor:
    fullname: M Jaibaji
– volume: 19
  start-page: 529
  year: 2013
  ident: 4294_CR14
  publication-title: Tissue Eng Part A
  doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0208
  contributor:
    fullname: S Liu
– volume: 34
  start-page: 137
  year: 2009
  ident: 4294_CR17
  publication-title: J Hand Surg (Eur Vol)
  doi: 10.1177/17531934097321
  contributor:
    fullname: JB Tang
– volume: 5
  start-page: 20
  year: 2011
  ident: 4294_CR9
  publication-title: J Tissue Eng Regen Med
  doi: 10.1002/term.284
  contributor:
    fullname: OA Branford
– volume: 39
  start-page: 215
  year: 2023
  ident: 4294_CR24
  publication-title: Hand Clin
  doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2022.12.001
  contributor:
    fullname: C Aletto
– volume: 44
  start-page: 645
  year: 2012
  ident: 4294_CR10
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
  doi: 10.1002/lsm.22066
  contributor:
    fullname: T Ni
– volume: 5
  start-page: 537
  year: 1980
  ident: 4294_CR19
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Am
  doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(80)80101-8
  contributor:
    fullname: JW Strickland
– volume: 143
  start-page: 1133
  year: 2022
  ident: 4294_CR18
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04506-1
  contributor:
    fullname: C Wirtz
– volume: 12
  start-page: 8668
  year: 2020
  ident: 4294_CR27
  publication-title: Orthop Rev (Pavia).
  contributor:
    fullname: C Fulchignoni
– volume: 37
  start-page: 555
  year: 2012
  ident: 4294_CR7
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Eur
  doi: 10.1177/1753193411432675
  contributor:
    fullname: OA Branford
– volume: 26
  start-page: 179
  year: 2010
  ident: 4294_CR21
  publication-title: Hand Clin
  doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.004
  contributor:
    fullname: A Momeni
– volume: 31
  start-page: 969
  year: 2013
  ident: 4294_CR13
  publication-title: J Orthop Res
  doi: 10.1002/jor.22305
  contributor:
    fullname: C Zhao
– volume: 07
  start-page: 244
  year: 2016
  ident: 4294_CR23
  publication-title: J Hand Microsurg
  doi: 10.1007/s12593-015-0192-4
  contributor:
    fullname: H Akbari
– volume: 18
  start-page: 411
  year: 1993
  ident: 4294_CR20
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Am
  doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90083-F
  contributor:
    fullname: CW Stegink Jansen
– volume: 17
  start-page: 132
  year: 1992
  ident: 4294_CR22
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Am
  doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(92)90128-C
  contributor:
    fullname: L Hagberg
– volume: 33
  start-page: 412
  year: 2008
  ident: 4294_CR1
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Eur
  doi: 10.1177/1753193408090758
  contributor:
    fullname: RH Caulfield
– volume: 07
  start-page: 25
  year: 2016
  ident: 4294_CR25
  publication-title: J Hand Microsurg
  doi: 10.1007/s12593-014-0156-0
  contributor:
    fullname: C Savvidou
SSID ssj0050584
Score 2.3496337
Snippet Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in...
Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in...
Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor...
BackgroundPeritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased...
BACKGROUNDPeritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased...
Abstract Background Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Adhesion
Analysis
Animal models
Anti-adhesion barrier
Anti-inflammatory agents
Collagen
Collagen sheet
Flexor tendon repair
Flexor zone 2
Hyaluronic acid
Injuries
Medical records
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Normal distribution
Orthopedics
Patients
Range of motion
Rehabilitation
Statistical analysis
Student's t-test
Surgery
Tendon adhesion
Tendons
Vitamin C
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1NaxYxEA7SkxdRqrhaSwTBg4TuZvPprUpLEfRksbew-Rj7guzKvlso_noz2d3S1YMXr5uEZJ-ZzEw-5gkhb7IO6NQGzkAFyYQBYMZEyZKseadDqKGQPX_-oi4uxacreXXvqS-8EzbTA8_AnSipA9eh1U0ywqfkIfocpaikBFjwqVjf2q6LqdkGZ7duxJoiY9TJPlvqxrDsnxgaYMHajRsqbP1_2-Q_70neczznj8mjJWKkp_NIn5AHqT8k3876sBsxrfE7xV3soadjdiy7keJpMMXdVVpEnPWD7q9Tmuiup_Aj3Q4j_TX0ifL3ucU0DmuqJS1Es0_J5fnZ148XbHkjgQVh-cQg8sZb1TWhDtbXSSoRuOcgo5QShIqdbHNUE7SADD9S-yiVwAoTo20iQPuMHPS51-eEKqhBBA_QmSh0Ssa0XYbdRs3bGMFX5N0Kmfs5U2G4soQwys0AuwywKwC7tiIfENW7mkhjXT5k4bpFuO5fwq3IW5SJw8mWJRC6JWcgDxhpq9yp1rlL3L-pyNGmZp4kYVu8StUtk3Tv8IwV2YxqVZHXd8XYEi-e9Wm4wTqm0RgEioqYjTZs_mxb0u-uC1F3U8hwrHzxP7B4SR7iU_foN7k4IgfTeJNe5YBo8sdF938DVCkLuA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9UwFA969-KLKCpWp0QQfJCwNs1XfZFN7hiCQ8Th3kLzcbYLo529HYh_vTm57bQKvjYJJz3fOUl-IeR10gEda88ZKC-ZMADMmCBZlCVvtfclZLDnT6fq5Ex8PJfnU8FtOx2rnH1idtSh91gjP8ANMYSeKdX76-8MX43C3dXpCY27ZI-nlUK5IntH69PPX2ZfnMK7EfNVGaMOtsljV4alOMXQEQtWL8JRRu3_1zf_fV7yjwB0_IDcnzJHergT9UNyJ3aPyLd15zcDXm-8oFjN7js6pACzGSjOm2KVlWZRJz2h28sYR7rpKFzFH_1Af_ZdpPxdGjEO_XzlkmbA2cfk7Hj99cMJm95KYF40fGQQeOUa1Va-9I0ro1TCc8dBBiklCBVaWafsxmsBSQwI8aNUhEaYEJoqANRPyKpLVJ8SqqAE4R1Aa4LQMRpTt7WumqB5HQK4grydWWavd5AYNi8ljLI7BtvEYJsZbOuCHCFXb3sinHX-0A8XdrIOq6T2XPtEJRrhYnQQXEpFVVQCGnCxIG9QJhaNLknAt9PdgTRhhK-yh1onkljHKcj-omcyFr9snqVqJ2Pd2t-qVZBXt804Eg-gdbG_wT6m0pgMioKYhTYs_mzZ0m0uM2B3lUFxGvns_9Sfk3v4mD1GRi72yWocbuKLlPKM7uWk178ABEYDQg
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access(OpenAccess)
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA_revEiiorVVSIIHiTapvmqILLKLougJx_uLTRfuw-Wdu3rwupf70xe-7C6R69NQtLfzGQmH_MLIS9BB3SsPWdJecmESYkZEySLsuSt9r5Mmez5y1d1shKfT-XpHpmfO5oA3Ny4tMP3pFbDxZvrHz8_gMG_zwZv1NsNzMOVYeB9GE6vgtW3yG0uYKWOV_nE7lQBnL0Rc-LMje0Wzilz-P87U_99e_IPd3R8j9yd4kh6uBX8fbIXuwfk-1Hn1wMmO55R3NvuOzqAu1kPFM-IKe650ix40Bq6OY9xpOuOpot43Q_0V99Fyt9Bi3Ho5wRMmulnH5LV8dG3TydsejmBedHwkaXAK9eotvKlb1wZpRKeO55kkFImoUIra4h1vBYJhIKEP0rF1AgTQlOFlOpHZL-DXh8TqlKZhHcptSYIHaMxdVvrqgma1yEkV5DXM2T2ckuQYfPCwii7BdgCwDYDbOuCfERUdzWR3Dp_6IczO9mKVVJ7rj30Eo1wMboUHASmKiqRmuRiQV6hTCwqBUjAt1MmAQwYyazsodbQJe7qFORgURNMxy-LZ6naWfMsnrwix1GpCvJiV4wt8TpaF_srrGMqjaGhKIhZaMPiz5Yl3fo803dXmSKnkU_-BxZPyR2OCgzelIsDsj8OV_EZhEmje551_zdJSRKy
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2890077606
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2881712514
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10594895
https://doaj.org/article/657c27c371e84beebfdb1616e64f9fbe
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZJeumltLSlbpNFhUIPRVk_9HJvm7AhLGwIbUP3JqxXYkjs4HWg9NdnpLVD3d56scGSkDwz0oxGM58Q-gQyIFxhcuK5YYRK74mUlhHH0rwSxqQ-gj2vL_j5FV1t2GYP8TEXJgbtG10fN7d3x019E2Mr7-_MfIwTm1-uT7MIMlKy-T7aBwkd9-i79RdUuqRjeozk8y2s0pkkoJtIWHwpKSYqKCL1_7se_x0j-YfSOXuJXgzWIl7sRvUK7bnmNfq5bEzdhZTGaxw82G2DO1AqdYfDSTAOnlUc2Quygbc3zvW4brC_db_aDv9uG4fzr9Ci79oxzRJHkNk36Ops-eP0nAz3IxBDy7wn3uaZLnmVmdSUOnWMU5Pr3DPLGPOU24oVYNEYQT2QPsD6cO48UM7aMrPeF2_RQQO9vkOY-9RTo72vpKXCOSmLqhBZaUVeWOt1gr6MJFP3OxgMFbcPkqsdgRUQWEUCqyJBJ4GqTzUDhHX80HbXamCk4kyYXBjoxUmqndPeajA_uePUl167BH0OPFFhogEHTDXkC8CAA2SVWggBXQbfTYIOJzVhgphp8chVNUzQrQrnqwHJKOUJ-vhUHFqGoLPGtQ-hjsxEMABpguREGiZ_Ni0BmY0g3aOMvv__ph_Q83C5fdCUOT1EB3334I7ABOr1DOR-I2bo2WKx-r6C98ny4vLbLDoU4LmmchbnxCMiRQ9z
link.rule.ids 230,315,730,783,787,867,888,2109,12068,21400,24330,27936,27937,31731,31732,33756,33757,43322,43817,53804,53806
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1baxQxFA7aPuhLUVScWjWC4IOEziW38UVa2bJqu4i02LcwubULMtPObkH89Z6TnamOgq-ThJM595wkXwh5DTqgQuVKFqUTjOsYmdZesCDyslHO5TGBPZ8s5PyMfzoX50PBbTUcqxx9YnLUvnNYI9_HDTGEnsnl-6trhq9G4e7q8ITGXbKNUFWw-No-nC2-fB19MYR3zcerMlrur8BjF5pBnGLoiDmrJuEoofb_65v_Pi_5RwA6ekB2hsyRHmxE_ZDcCe0j8m3WumWP1xsvKFazu5b2EGCWPcV5U6yy0iRq0BO6ugxhTZctjd_Dj66nP7s20PIdjFj33XjlkibA2cfk7Gh2-mHOhrcSmON1uWbRl4WtZVO43NU2D0JyV9oyCi-EiFz6RlSQ3TjFI4gBIX6kDLHm2vu68DFWT8hWC1SfEipjHrmzMTbacxWC1lVTqaL2qqy8jzYjb0eWmasNJIZJSwktzYbBBhhsEoNNlZFD5OptT4SzTh-6_sIM1mGkUK5UDqgEzW0INnoLqagMksc62pCRNygTg0YHEnDNcHcAJozwVeZAKSCJdZyM7E16grG4afMoVTMY68r8Vq2MvLptxpF4AK0N3Q32AfXCZJBnRE-0YfJn05Z2eZkAu4sEilOL3f9Tf0nuzU9Pjs3xx8XnZ-Q-PmyPUbLke2Rr3d-E55D-rO2LQcd_AXmnBjw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFLagSIgLiwARKGAkJA4oM4njLdxK6agsrXqgohIHK97aqG0yymQk1F_PsyepSLn1Gtuyne9tsd_7gtB7kAHhCkNSzw1LqfQ-ldKy1LGMVMKYzEey54NDvn9Mv52wkyGrcjWkVTZG17Pm4nLW1Gcxt3J5aeZjntj86GA3jyQjJZsvrZ_fRfdAaTM-fqlvrDA4dknHIhnJ5yuw1blMwUOlwQTTtJg4osjX_79Vvpkp-Y_rWTxCv8dFbzJOzmfrXs_M1Q0-x9vt6jF6OESkeGfT5wm645qn6NdeY-oulE2e4nBK3ja4A8dVdzjcNuNweoujCIH84dWZcz2uG-wv3J-2w1dt4zD5BCP6rh1LOXEksn2Gjhd7P3f30-EfDKmhJelTb0muS17lJjOlzhzj1BBNPLOMMU-5rVgBUZMR1AO8gTqIc-dhH9aWufW-eI62Gpj1BcLcZ54a7X0lLRXOSVlUhchLK0hhrdcJ-jgCopYbqg0VP1EkVxv4FMCnInyqSNDngNl1z0CTHR-03akaXqviTBgiDMziJNXOaW81hLjccepLr12CPgTEVVBmwNdUQ00CLDjQYqkdIWDKcD6UoO1JT1BCM20eZUYNRmClwh1uYEvKeILeXTeHkSGxrXHtOvSRuQhBJk2QnMjaZGfTFpCgSAQ-SszL2w99i-4ffVmoH18Pv79CD0jQD3DMhG6jrb5bu9cQcfX6TVStv2szLkc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Encircling+tendon+repair+site+with+collagen+sheet+in+flexor+zone+2%3A+retrospective+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+surgery+and+research&rft.au=Burak+Ya%C5%9Far&rft.date=2023-10-24&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13018-023-04294-3&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_657c27c371e84beebfdb1616e64f9fbe
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon