Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing

Three experiments were designed to examine temporal envelope processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. In experiment 1, the hypothesis that listeners' modulation sensitivity would in part determine their ability to discriminate between temporal modulation rates was examined. Temporal modul...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in	The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 130; no. 3; pp. 1567 - 1580
Main Authors	Chatterjee, Monita, Oberzut, Cherish
Format	Journal Article
Language	English
Published	Melville, NY Acoustical Society of America 01.09.2011 American Institute of Physics
Subjects	Acoustic Stimulation Adult Aged Audiometry Auditory Perception Auditory Threshold Biological and medical sciences Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation Cochlear Implants Correction of Hearing Impairment - psychology Cues Discrimination (Psychology) Diseases of the ear Electric Stimulation Ent and stomatology Female Humans Loudness Perception Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nonlinear Dynamics Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology Persons With Hearing Impairments - rehabilitation Psychological Acoustics Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Signal Detection, Psychological Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Time Factors Young Adult Amplitude modulation Hearing aids Hearing Discrimination Auditive prosthesis
Online Access	Get full text
ISSN	0001-4966 1520-8524 1520-8524
DOI	10.1121/1.3621445

Cover

Abstract	Three experiments were designed to examine temporal envelope processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. In experiment 1, the hypothesis that listeners' modulation sensitivity would in part determine their ability to discriminate between temporal modulation rates was examined. Temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) obtained in an amplitude modulation detection (AMD) task were compared to threshold functions obtained in an amplitude modulation rate discrimination (AMRD) task. Statistically significant nonlinear correlations were observed between the two measures. In experiment 2, results of loudness-balancing showed small increases in the loudness of modulated over unmodulated stimuli beyond a modulation depth of 16%. Results of experiment 3 indicated small but statistically significant effects of level-roving on the overall gain of the TMTF, but no impact of level-roving on the average shape of the TMTF across subjects. This suggested that level-roving simply increased the task difficulty for most listeners, but did not indicate increased use of intensity cues under more challenging conditions. Data obtained with one subject, however, suggested that the most sensitive listeners may derive some benefit from intensity cues in these tasks. Overall, results indicated that intensity cues did not play an important role in temporal envelope processing by the average CI listener.
AbstractList	Three experiments were designed to examine temporal envelope processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. In experiment 1, the hypothesis that listeners' modulation sensitivity would in part determine their ability to discriminate between temporal modulation rates was examined. Temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) obtained in an amplitude modulation detection (AMD) task were compared to threshold functions obtained in an amplitude modulation rate discrimination (AMRD) task. Statistically significant nonlinear correlations were observed between the two measures. In experiment 2, results of loudness-balancing showed small increases in the loudness of modulated over unmodulated stimuli beyond a modulation depth of 16%. Results of experiment 3 indicated small but statistically significant effects of level-roving on the overall gain of the TMTF, but no impact of level-roving on the average shape of the TMTF across subjects. This suggested that level-roving simply increased the task difficulty for most listeners, but did not indicate increased use of intensity cues under more challenging conditions. Data obtained with one subject, however, suggested that the most sensitive listeners may derive some benefit from intensity cues in these tasks. Overall, results indicated that intensity cues did not play an important role in temporal envelope processing by the average CI listener. Three experiments were designed to examine temporal envelope processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. In experiment 1, the hypothesis that listeners’ modulation sensitivity would in part determine their ability to discriminate between temporal modulation rates was examined. Temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) obtained in an amplitude modulation detection (AMD) task were compared to threshold functions obtained in an amplitude modulation rate discrimination (AMRD) task. Statistically significant nonlinear correlations were observed between the two measures. In experiment 2, results of loudness-balancing showed small increases in the loudness of modulated over unmodulated stimuli beyond a modulation depth of 16%. Results of experiment 3 indicated small but statistically significant effects of level-roving on the overall gain of the TMTF, but no impact of level-roving on the average shape of the TMTF across subjects. This suggested that level-roving simply increased the task difficulty for most listeners, but did not indicate increased use of intensity cues under more challenging conditions. Data obtained with one subject, however, suggested that the most sensitive listeners may derive some benefit from intensity cues in these tasks. Overall, results indicated that intensity cues did not play an important role in temporal envelope processing by the average CI listener. Three experiments were designed to examine temporal envelope processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. In experiment 1, the hypothesis that listeners' modulation sensitivity would in part determine their ability to discriminate between temporal modulation rates was examined. Temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) obtained in an amplitude modulation detection (AMD) task were compared to threshold functions obtained in an amplitude modulation rate discrimination (AMRD) task. Statistically significant nonlinear correlations were observed between the two measures. In experiment 2, results of loudness-balancing showed small increases in the loudness of modulated over unmodulated stimuli beyond a modulation depth of 16%. Results of experiment 3 indicated small but statistically significant effects of level-roving on the overall gain of the TMTF, but no impact of level-roving on the average shape of the TMTF across subjects. This suggested that level-roving simply increased the task difficulty for most listeners, but did not indicate increased use of intensity cues under more challenging conditions. Data obtained with one subject, however, suggested that the most sensitive listeners may derive some benefit from intensity cues in these tasks. Overall, results indicated that intensity cues did not play an important role in temporal envelope processing by the average CI listener.Three experiments were designed to examine temporal envelope processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. In experiment 1, the hypothesis that listeners' modulation sensitivity would in part determine their ability to discriminate between temporal modulation rates was examined. Temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) obtained in an amplitude modulation detection (AMD) task were compared to threshold functions obtained in an amplitude modulation rate discrimination (AMRD) task. Statistically significant nonlinear correlations were observed between the two measures. In experiment 2, results of loudness-balancing showed small increases in the loudness of modulated over unmodulated stimuli beyond a modulation depth of 16%. Results of experiment 3 indicated small but statistically significant effects of level-roving on the overall gain of the TMTF, but no impact of level-roving on the average shape of the TMTF across subjects. This suggested that level-roving simply increased the task difficulty for most listeners, but did not indicate increased use of intensity cues under more challenging conditions. Data obtained with one subject, however, suggested that the most sensitive listeners may derive some benefit from intensity cues in these tasks. Overall, results indicated that intensity cues did not play an important role in temporal envelope processing by the average CI listener.
Author	Chatterjee, Monita Oberzut, Cherish
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Monita surname: Chatterjee fullname: Chatterjee, Monita email: mchatterjee@hesp.umd.edu organization: Cochlear Implants and Psychophysics Laboratory, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 – sequence: 2 givenname: Cherish surname: Oberzut fullname: Oberzut, Cherish organization: Cochlear Implants and Psychophysics Laboratory, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
BackLink	http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24533400$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21895095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNp9kstu1TAQhi1URE8LC14AZYOARdrxLbE3lVDLTarUDawtx3ZaI8c-2AkSb1-3J6dcBKwsj7_5PfPPHKGDmKJD6DmGE4wJPsUntCOYMf4IbTAn0ApO2AHaAABumey6Q3RUytd65YLKJ-iQYCE5SL5BVxdudmb2KTY62ibr2TXWF5P95KO-j6ex0dM2-HmxrpmSXcIu7mPjQs3N3ujQ3Didfbx-ih6POhT3bD2P0Zf37z6ff2wvrz58On972RomydyaQfDOaYZBcwPdMBAqJHWSda7XvZYWhs5oMBQcM4JJxoUFbu2A-5FBJ-kxOtvpbpdhcta4OGcd1LbWrfMPlbRXv79Ef6Ou03dFsRCyx1Xg1SqQ07fFlVlNtW0Xgo4uLUUJIUBIQmglX_-XxECIED0BUdEXv1b1UM7e7wq8XAFdqmtj1tH48pNjnFIGULnTHWdyKiW7URk_39tem_Gh_qnuJq-wWidfM978kbEX_Ru7mlf2qv-GH_ZD1f1Qd_uhLL0FtYzCiw
CODEN	JASMAN
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2013_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1177_2331216514553783 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0139546 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_021_00828_w crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0000610 crossref_primary_10_1121_1_5130384 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2024_109026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neures_2021_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1121_1_5025048 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_022_00854_2 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0016365 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_014_0468_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_022_00876_w crossref_primary_10_3109_14992027_2014_893374 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0019452 crossref_primary_10_1097_AUD_0000000000001383 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_022_00834_6 crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4929938 crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4967298 crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4869687 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2017_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1097_AUD_0000000000001289 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneumeth_2013_10_016 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0099338 crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165241229880 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_012_0354_z crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165251317006 crossref_primary_10_1097_AUD_0000000000000417 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2015_12_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2011_11_009 crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4944564 crossref_primary_10_1177_2331216520936160 crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2020_1841628 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2014_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_374035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2015_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2023_108744 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_51514_3 crossref_primary_10_1097_AUD_0000000000000588
Cites_doi	10.1121/1.1785611 10.1121/1.420344 10.1121/1.1985024 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.009 10.1097/00001756-200209160-00013 10.1121/1.383531 10.1121/1.1912375 10.1007/s10162-009-0188-5 10.1121/1.429605 10.1121/1.1929258 10.1007/s10162-005-0007-6 10.1121/1.1886405 10.3758/BF03204321 10.1121/1.2537501 10.1121/1.428448 10.1007/s10162-004-4050-5 10.1007/s10162-007-0071-1 10.1121/1.411872 10.1121/1.428150 10.1007/s10162-005-0027-2 10.1121/1.420347 10.1109/19.997828 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4949-09.2010 10.1121/1.2828051 10.1121/1.426893 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004 10.1007/s101620010079 10.1126/science.270.5234.303 10.1121/1.403807 10.1121/1.1555613 10.1098/rstb.1992.0070 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181888f61 10.1007/s10162-004-4046-1 10.1121/1.3280236 10.1044/jslhr.4005.1201
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2011 Acoustical Society of America 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2011 Acoustical Society of America 2011 Acoustical Society of America
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2011 Acoustical Society of America – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2011 Acoustical Society of America 2011 Acoustical Society of America
DBID	AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7X8 5PM
DOI	10.1121/1.3621445
DatabaseName	CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Animal Behavior Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	Animal Behavior Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Physics
EISSN	1520-8524
EndPage	1580
ExternalDocumentID	PMC3188971 21895095 24533400 10_1121_1_3621445 jasa
Genre	Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml	– fundername: UNSPECIFIED grantid: R01-DC-004786 to MC – fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS grantid: R01-DC-004786 – fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS grantid: R01 DC004786
GroupedDBID	--- --Z -~X .DC .GJ 123 186 29L 3O- 4.4 41~ 5-Q 53G 5RE 5VS 6TJ 85S AAAAW AAEUA AAPUP AAYIH ABDNZ ABEFF ABEFU ABJNI ABNAN ABPPZ ABTAH ABZEH ACBNA ACBRY ACCUC ACGFO ACGFS ACNCT ACXMS ACYGS ADCTM AEGXH AENEX AETEA AFFNX AFHCQ AGKCL AGLKD AGMXG AGTJO AGVCI AHPGS AHSDT AI. AIAGR AIDUJ AIZTS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQWKA BAUXJ CS3 D0L DU5 EBS EJD ESX F5P G8K H~9 M71 M73 MVM NEJ NHB OHT OK1 P2P RAZ RIP RNS ROL RQS S10 SC5 SJN TN5 TWZ UCJ UHB UPT UQL VH1 VOH VQA WH7 XFK XJT XOL XSW YQT ZCG ZXP ZY4 ~02 ~G0 AAGWI AAYXX ABJGX ADMLS AEILP CITATION ABDPE ADXHL IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7X8 5PM
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-cb856ea410a5c06bb23893e946e7a7a9d0b6ca0c30e4c849458d05ddb17f40693
ISSN	0001-4966 1520-8524
IngestDate	Thu Aug 21 14:12:56 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 19:45:18 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 18:23:39 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:03:19 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:16:08 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:44 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:56:55 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 21 00:19:17 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess	false
IsOpenAccess	true
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	3
Keywords	Amplitude modulation Hearing aids Hearing Discrimination Auditive prosthesis
Language	English
License	CC BY 4.0 2011 Acoustical Society of America
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c492t-cb856ea410a5c06bb23893e946e7a7a9d0b6ca0c30e4c849458d05ddb17f40693
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: mchatterjee@hesp.umd.edu
OpenAccessLink	https://asa.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1121/1.3621445
PMID	21895095
PQID	1022887208
PQPubID	23462
PageCount	14
ParticipantIDs	pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3188971 proquest_miscellaneous_888089223 proquest_miscellaneous_1022887208 pubmed_primary_21895095 pascalfrancis_primary_24533400 crossref_citationtrail_10_1121_1_3621445 crossref_primary_10_1121_1_3621445 scitation_primary_10_1121_1_3621445Detection_and_rate_d
ProviderPackageCode	CITATION AAYXX
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2011-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2011-09-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 09 year: 2011 text: 2011-09-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	Melville, NY
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Melville, NY – name: United States
PublicationTitle	The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
PublicationTitleAlternate	J Acoust Soc Am
PublicationYear	2011
Publisher	Acoustical Society of America American Institute of Physics
Publisher_xml	– name: Acoustical Society of America – name: American Institute of Physics
References	McKay, C.; Henshall, K. 2010; 11 Chatterjee, M.; Peng, S. 2008; 235 Chatterjee, M.; Robert, M. 2001; 2 Dau, T.; Kollmeier, B.; Kohlrausch, A. 1997; 102 Hillenbrand, J.; Getty, L.; Clark, M.; Wheeler, K. 1995; 97 Levitt, H. 1971; 49 Fu, Q.-J. 2002; 13 Rosen, S. 1992; 336 Jesteadt, W. 1980; 28 Kohlrausch, A.; Fassel, R.; Dau, T. 2000; 108 Luo, X.; Fu, Q.-J.; Wei, C.; Cao, K. 2008; 29 Galvin, J.; Fu, Q.-J. 2005; 6 Moore, B.; Vickers, D.; Baer, T.; Launer, S. 1999; 105 Fu, Q.-J.; Chinchilla, S.; Galvin, J. 2004; 5 Chatterjee, M.; Oba, S. 2005; 118 Shannon, R.; Zeng, F.; Kamath, V.; Wygonski, J.; Ekelid, M. 1995; 270 Pfingst, B.; Burkholder-Juhasz, R.; Xu, L.; Thompson, C. 2008; 123 Harmer, G.; Davis, B.; Abbott, D. 2002; 51 Zeng, F.; Zhang, C. 1997; 102 Green, T.; Faulkner, A.; Rosen, S. 2004; 116 Viemeister, N. 1979; 66 Fishman, K.; Shannon, R.; Slattery, W. 1997; 40 Dorman, M.; Spahr, T.; Gifford, R.; Loiselle, L.; McKarns, S.; Holden, T.; Skinner, M.; Finley, C. 2007; 8 Pfingst, B.; Xu, L.; Thompson, C. 2007; 121 Boex, C.; Baud, L.; Cosendai, G.; Sigrist, A.; Kos, M.; Pelizzone, M. 2006; 7 Luo, X.; Galvin, J.; Fu, Q.-J. 2010; 127 Shannon, R. 1992; 91 Chatterjee, M. 2003; 113 Chatterjee, M.; Oba, S. 2004; 5 Galvin, J.; Fu, Q.-J. 2009; 250 Fu, Q; Chinchilla, S.; Nogaki, G.; Galvin, J. 2005; 118 Zeng, F.; Turner, C. 1991; 43A Shannon, R.; Jensvold, A.; Padilla, M.; Robert, M. 1999; 106 Xu, L.; Thompson, C.; Pfingst, B. 2005; 117 Chatterjee, M.; Fu, Q.-J.; Shannon, R. 2000; 107 Middlebrooks, J.; Snyder, R. 2010; 30 (2023080109024038500_c4) 2004; 5 (2023080109024038500_c25) 2010; 127 (2023080109024038500_c34) 1995; 270 (2023080109024038500_c31) 2002 (2023080109024038500_c35) 1979; 66 (2023080109024038500_c1) 2006; 7 (2023080109024038500_c8) 1997; 102 (2023080109024038500_c9) 2002 (2023080109024038500_c39) 1999; 106 (2023080109024038500_c15) 2004; 5 (2023080109024038500_c28) 1999; 105 (2023080109024038500_c37) 1991; 43A (2023080109024038500_c36) 2005; 117 (2023080109024038500_c11) 2005; 6 (2023080109024038500_c18) 2004; 116 (2023080109024038500_c21) 1980; 28 (2023080109024038500_c38) 1997; 102 (2023080109024038500_c5) 2005; 118 (2023080109024038500_c12) 2009; 250 (2023080109024038500_c6) 2008; 235 (2023080109024038500_c16) 2005; 118 (2023080109024038500_c24) 2008; 29 (2023080109024038500_c26) 2010; 11 (2023080109024038500_c13) 1997; 40 (2023080109024038500_c22) 2000; 108 (2023080109024038500_c7) 2001; 2 (2023080109024038500_c30) 2007; 121 (2023080109024038500_c3) 2000; 107 (2023080109024038500_c29) 2008; 123 (2023080109024038500_c33) 1992; 91 (2023080109024038500_c20) 1995; 97 (2023080109024038500_c32) 1992; 336 (2023080109024038500_c14) 2002; 13 (2023080109024038500_c2) 2003; 113 (2023080109024038500_c10) 2007; 8 (2023080109024038500_c23) 1971; 49 (2023080109024038500_c19) 2002; 51 (2023080109024038500_c17) 1988 (2023080109024038500_c27) 2010; 30 7759650 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 May;97(5 Pt 1):3099-111 15492884 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Sep;5(3):253-60 10335628 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 May;105(5):2757-72 7569981 - Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):303-4 19450432 - Hear Res. 2009 Apr;250(1-2):46-54 5541744 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467 12352617 - Neuroreport. 2002 Sep 16;13(13):1635-9 18093766 - Hear Res. 2008 Jan;235(1-2):143-56 16450213 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Jun;7(2):110-24 16240829 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Sep;118(3 Pt 1):1711-8 16075190 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Sep;6(3):269-79 1354376 - Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 29;336(1278):367-73 12703715 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr;113(4 Pt 1):2042-53 7413416 - Percept Psychophys. 1980 Jul;28(1):85-8 15532661 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2298-310 17351713 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Jun;8(2):234-40 16158655 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):993-1002 15675001 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Dec;5(4):360-75 15957791 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 May;117(5):3255-67 9373979 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):2925-34 1597606 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr;91(4 Pt 1):2156-64 10955639 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Aug;108(2):723-34 18247907 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Feb;123(2):1054-62 17471737 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Apr;121(4):2236-46 9373976 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):2892-905 10615713 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):L71-4 18818548 - Ear Hear. 2008 Dec;29(6):957-70 1775657 - Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 Aug;43(3):565-83 9328890 - J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Oct;40(5):1201-15 500975 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1979 Nov;66(5):1364-80 19798533 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Mar;11(1):101-11 20136174 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):EL23-9 20130202 - J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 3;30(5):1937-46 11550525 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001 Jun;2(2):159-71 10738817 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Mar;107(3):1637-44
References_xml	– volume: 116 start-page: 2298-2310 year: 2004 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1785611 – volume: 102 start-page: 2892-2905 year: 1997 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.420344 – volume: 43A start-page: 565-583 year: 1991 publication-title: Q. J. Exp. Psychol. – volume: 118 start-page: 1711-1718 year: 2005 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1985024 – volume: 250 start-page: 46-64 year: 2009 publication-title: Hearing Res. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.009 – volume: 13 start-page: 1635-1639 year: 2002 publication-title: Neuroreport doi: 10.1097/00001756-200209160-00013 – volume: 66 start-page: 1364-1380 year: 1979 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.383531 – volume: 49 start-page: 467-477 year: 1971 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1912375 – volume: 11 start-page: 101-111 year: 2010 publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-009-0188-5 – volume: 108 start-page: 723-734 year: 2000 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.429605 – volume: 118 start-page: 993-1002 year: 2005 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1929258 – volume: 6 start-page: 269-279 year: 2005 publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0007-6 – volume: 117 start-page: 3255-3267 year: 2005 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1886405 – volume: 28 start-page: 85-88 year: 1980 publication-title: Percept. Psychophys. doi: 10.3758/BF03204321 – volume: 121 start-page: 2236-2246 year: 2007 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.2537501 – volume: 107 start-page: 1637-1644 year: 2000 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.428448 – volume: 5 start-page: 360-375 year: 2004 publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-004-4050-5 – volume: 8 start-page: 234-240 year: 2007 publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-007-0071-1 – volume: 97 start-page: 3099-3111 year: 1995 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.411872 – volume: 106 start-page: L71-L74 year: 1999 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.428150 – volume: 7 start-page: 110-124 year: 2006 publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolayngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0027-2 – volume: 40 start-page: 1201-1215 year: 1997 publication-title: J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. – volume: 102 start-page: 2925-2934 year: 1997 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.420347 – volume: 51 start-page: 299-309 year: 2002 publication-title: IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. doi: 10.1109/19.997828 – volume: 127 start-page: EL23-EL29 year: 2010 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. – volume: 30 start-page: 1937-1946 year: 2010 publication-title: J. Neurosci. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4949-09.2010 – volume: 123 start-page: 1054-1062 year: 2008 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.2828051 – volume: 105 start-page: 2757-2772 year: 1999 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.426893 – volume: 235 start-page: 143-156 year: 2008 publication-title: Hear. Res. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004 – volume: 2 start-page: 159-171 year: 2001 publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s101620010079 – volume: 270 start-page: 303-304 year: 1995 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.303 – volume: 91 start-page: 2156-2164 year: 1992 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.403807 – volume: 113 start-page: 2042-2053 year: 2003 publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1555613 – volume: 336 start-page: 367-373 year: 1992 publication-title: Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0070 – volume: 29 start-page: 957-970 year: 2008 publication-title: Ear Hear. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181888f61 – volume: 5 start-page: 253-260 year: 2004 publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-004-4046-1 – volume: 121 start-page: 2236 issue: 4 year: 2007 ident: 2023080109024038500_c30 article-title: Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.2537501 – volume: 107 start-page: 1637 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: 2023080109024038500_c3 article-title: Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.428448 – volume: 5 start-page: 360 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 2023080109024038500_c4 article-title: Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-004-4050-5 – volume: 118 start-page: 1711 year: 2005 ident: 2023080109024038500_c16 article-title: Voice gender identification by cochlear implant users: The role of spectral and temporal resolution publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1985024 – volume: 250 start-page: 46 issue: 1–2 year: 2009 ident: 2023080109024038500_c12 article-title: Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users publication-title: Hearing Res. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.009 – volume: 116 start-page: 2298 year: 2004 ident: 2023080109024038500_c18 article-title: Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1785611 – volume: 43A start-page: 565 year: 1991 ident: 2023080109024038500_c37 article-title: Binaural loudness matches in unilaterally impaired listeners publication-title: Q. J. Exp. Psychol. – volume: 8 start-page: 234 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 2023080109024038500_c10 article-title: An electric place-frequency map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-007-0071-1 – volume: 29 start-page: 957 issue: 6 year: 2008 ident: 2023080109024038500_c24 article-title: Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users publication-title: Ear Hear. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181888f61 – volume: 30 start-page: 1937 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 2023080109024038500_c27 article-title: Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity publication-title: J. Neurosci. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4949-09.2010 – volume: 123 start-page: 1054 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 2023080109024038500_c29 article-title: Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.2828051 – volume: 6 start-page: 269 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: 2023080109024038500_c11 article-title: Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0007-6 – start-page: 19 volume-title: Profile Analysis: Auditory Intensity Discrimination year: 1988 ident: 2023080109024038500_c17 – volume: 118 start-page: 993 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 2023080109024038500_c5 article-title: Noise improves modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners at moderate carrier levels publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1929258 – volume-title: Abstracts 24th ARO Midwinter Meeting (Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Mt. Royal, NJ) year: 2002 ident: 2023080109024038500_c9 article-title: TMTFs in cochlear implant users: The role of loudness cues – volume: 28 start-page: 85 issue: 1 year: 1980 ident: 2023080109024038500_c21 article-title: An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments publication-title: Percept. Psychophys. doi: 10.3758/BF03204321 – volume: 2 start-page: 159 issue: 2 year: 2001 ident: 2023080109024038500_c7 article-title: Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: Stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system? publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s101620010079 – volume: 106 start-page: L71 issue: 6 year: 1999 ident: 2023080109024038500_c39 article-title: Consonant recordings for speech testing publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.428150 – volume: 7 start-page: 110 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 2023080109024038500_c1 article-title: Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolayngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0027-2 – volume: 11 start-page: 101 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 2023080109024038500_c26 article-title: Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-009-0188-5 – volume: 336 start-page: 367 issue: 1278 year: 1992 ident: 2023080109024038500_c32 article-title: Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory, and linguistic aspects publication-title: Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0070 – volume: 117 start-page: 3255 issue: 5 year: 2005 ident: 2023080109024038500_c36 article-title: Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1886405 – volume: 108 start-page: 723 issue: 2 year: 2000 ident: 2023080109024038500_c22 article-title: The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.429605 – volume: 102 start-page: 2925 year: 1997 ident: 2023080109024038500_c38 article-title: Loudness of dynamic stimuli in electric and acoustic hearing publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.420347 – volume: 13 start-page: 1635 issue: 13 year: 2002 ident: 2023080109024038500_c14 article-title: Temporal processing and speech recognition by cochlear implant users publication-title: Neuroreport doi: 10.1097/00001756-200209160-00013 – volume: 235 start-page: 143 issue: 1–2 year: 2008 ident: 2023080109024038500_c6 article-title: Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition publication-title: Hear. Res. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004 – volume: 105 start-page: 2757 issue: 5 year: 1999 ident: 2023080109024038500_c28 article-title: Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.426893 – volume: 49 start-page: 467 year: 1971 ident: 2023080109024038500_c23 article-title: Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1912375 – volume: 51 start-page: 299 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: 2023080109024038500_c19 article-title: A review of stochastic resonance: Circuits and measurement publication-title: IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. doi: 10.1109/19.997828 – volume-title: House Ear Institute Nucleus Research Interface User’s Guide year: 2002 ident: 2023080109024038500_c31 – volume: 102 start-page: 2892 year: 1997 ident: 2023080109024038500_c8 article-title: Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.420344 – volume: 5 start-page: 253 year: 2004 ident: 2023080109024038500_c15 article-title: The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users publication-title: J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s10162-004-4046-1 – volume: 127 start-page: EL23 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 2023080109024038500_c25 article-title: Effects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implants publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.3280236 – volume: 270 start-page: 303 year: 1995 ident: 2023080109024038500_c34 article-title: Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.303 – volume: 91 start-page: 2156 year: 1992 ident: 2023080109024038500_c33 article-title: Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.403807 – volume: 66 start-page: 1364 year: 1979 ident: 2023080109024038500_c35 article-title: Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.383531 – volume: 40 start-page: 1201 issue: 5 year: 1997 ident: 2023080109024038500_c13 article-title: Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor publication-title: J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4005.1201 – volume: 97 start-page: 3099 year: 1995 ident: 2023080109024038500_c20 article-title: Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.411872 – volume: 113 start-page: 2042 issue: 4 year: 2003 ident: 2023080109024038500_c2 article-title: Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: Envelope vs. tonotopic components publication-title: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. doi: 10.1121/1.1555613 – reference: 18818548 - Ear Hear. 2008 Dec;29(6):957-70 – reference: 1597606 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr;91(4 Pt 1):2156-64 – reference: 19798533 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Mar;11(1):101-11 – reference: 18247907 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Feb;123(2):1054-62 – reference: 11550525 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001 Jun;2(2):159-71 – reference: 20130202 - J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 3;30(5):1937-46 – reference: 7759650 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 May;97(5 Pt 1):3099-111 – reference: 16075190 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Sep;6(3):269-79 – reference: 15675001 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Dec;5(4):360-75 – reference: 5541744 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+ – reference: 15532661 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2298-310 – reference: 20136174 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):EL23-9 – reference: 18093766 - Hear Res. 2008 Jan;235(1-2):143-56 – reference: 10955639 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Aug;108(2):723-34 – reference: 10615713 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):L71-4 – reference: 16158655 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):993-1002 – reference: 12352617 - Neuroreport. 2002 Sep 16;13(13):1635-9 – reference: 7413416 - Percept Psychophys. 1980 Jul;28(1):85-8 – reference: 16450213 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Jun;7(2):110-24 – reference: 1354376 - Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 29;336(1278):367-73 – reference: 7569981 - Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):303-4 – reference: 9328890 - J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Oct;40(5):1201-15 – reference: 19450432 - Hear Res. 2009 Apr;250(1-2):46-54 – reference: 15492884 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Sep;5(3):253-60 – reference: 16240829 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Sep;118(3 Pt 1):1711-8 – reference: 9373976 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):2892-905 – reference: 500975 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1979 Nov;66(5):1364-80 – reference: 12703715 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr;113(4 Pt 1):2042-53 – reference: 1775657 - Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 Aug;43(3):565-83 – reference: 15957791 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 May;117(5):3255-67 – reference: 17471737 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Apr;121(4):2236-46 – reference: 17351713 - J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Jun;8(2):234-40 – reference: 10335628 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 May;105(5):2757-72 – reference: 9373979 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):2925-34 – reference: 10738817 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Mar;107(3):1637-44
SSID	ssj0005839
Score	2.218565
Snippet	Three experiments were designed to examine temporal envelope processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. In experiment 1, the hypothesis that listeners'... Three experiments were designed to examine temporal envelope processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. In experiment 1, the hypothesis that listeners’...
SourceID	pubmedcentral proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref scitation
SourceType	Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	1567
SubjectTerms	Acoustic Stimulation Adult Aged Audiometry Auditory Perception Auditory Threshold Biological and medical sciences Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation Cochlear Implants Correction of Hearing Impairment - psychology Cues Discrimination (Psychology) Diseases of the ear Electric Stimulation Ent and stomatology Female Humans Loudness Perception Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nonlinear Dynamics Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology Persons With Hearing Impairments - rehabilitation Psychological Acoustics Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Signal Detection, Psychological Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Time Factors Young Adult
Title	Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing
URI	http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3621445 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21895095 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1022887208 https://www.proquest.com/docview/888089223 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3188971
Volume	130
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link	http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFLagFQIJIXbCUhnEgUtax3G240AHjSqgEsxIFZcodhx1EMpUNFz49bxnO05CpypwiUaJJ078vrzFbyPkNeOaSxAMIY8zEQLDY6GMKhZqgV6nKgMhZ6p9fkoXK3F0kpwMYUUmu6ST--rX1ryS_6EqnAO6YpbsP1DW3xROwG-gLxyBwnD8Kxof6k67Vt8YJQ5qIzpclO3U1auCFcaMYwVL7HrjmnWZQiGmAY6hEXa17kXYtwE-I2XVJKCojWn9hfVDXKwnqrHW5eN9GYvZEjTko7mJsjQcw187fjv__HW1tF5-LBF9Ot5zwE3UYhK_ceV8PbcF-7SwXVU8t3VumPXYGje8EyzJbCSHo8S2eLrI4zny-GgfRC9Yg8kgyHrn_R_yzUcdcoF5x4xdJ7s8y9Cpvzs7_PjhyxASlMfOXLLP7SpRwYQHfrqJ_nL7rDqHVWhsD5RtRsrFWNuboNrYKIuRIrO8S-44otKZhdM9ck2398kNEwmszh-QYw8qCqCiCCo6BRXdNNSDig6gouuWDqCiDlQPyer9fPluEbquG6ESBe9CJfMk1ZWIWJUolkrJUafVhUh1VmVVUTOZqoqpmGmhclGIJK9ZUtcyyhpMo44fkZ120-onhPKkiSSo0A1YsaLRuUw13I2rVIkmlokOyJt-Lct-UbAzyvfSmKY8KqPSLXtAXvmhZ7YOy7ZBexOC-JE95QPysqdQCWwUfWNVqwHMJW58gLzlLA8IvWRMDrIuL0CfDshjS9RhgigvQPWGJ8gm5PYDsIr79Eq7PjXV3EGo5kUWwT89MC5_Qw-BEiBQIgTK-ulVb_2M3Bo-4udkp_vxU78AVbqTe-4L-A3pvs0T
linkProvider	EBSCOhost
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection+and+rate+discrimination+of+amplitude+modulation+in+electrical+hearing&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+the+Acoustical+Society+of+America&rft.au=CHATTERJEE%2C+Monita&rft.au=OBERZUT%2C+Cherish&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.pub=Acoustical+Society+of+America&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1567&rft.epage=1580&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121%2F1.3621445&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=24533400
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0001-4966&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0001-4966&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0001-4966&client=summon