Trends in Use of Ancillary Glaucoma Tests for Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma from 2001 to 2009
Purpose To assess trends in the use of ancillary diagnostic tests in the evaluation of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspects over the past decade. Design Retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis. Participants A total of 169 917 individuals with OAG and 395 721 individuals...
Saved in:
Published in | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 119; no. 4; pp. 748 - 758 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.04.2012
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose To assess trends in the use of ancillary diagnostic tests in the evaluation of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspects over the past decade. Design Retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis. Participants A total of 169 917 individuals with OAG and 395 721 individuals with suspected glaucoma aged ≥40 years enrolled in a national United States managed care network between 2001 and 2009. Methods Claims data were analyzed to assess trends in visual field (VF) testing, fundus photography (FP), and other ocular imaging (OOI) testing for patients with OAG or suspected glaucoma between 2001 and 2009. Repeated-measures logistic regression was performed to identify differences in the odds of undergoing these procedures in 2001, 2005, and 2009 and whether differences exist for patients under the exclusive care of optometrists versus ophthalmologists. Main Outcome Measures Odds and annual probabilities of undergoing VF testing, FP, and OOI for OAG from 2001 to 2009. Results For patients with OAG, the odds of undergoing VF testing decreased by 36% from 2001 to 2005, by 12% from 2005 to 2009, and by 44% from 2001 to 2009. By comparison, the odds of having OOI increased by 100% from 2001 to 2005, by 24% from 2005 to 2009, and by 147% from 2001 to 2009. Probabilities of undergoing FP were relatively low (13%–25%) for both provider types and remained fairly steady over the decade. For patients cared for exclusively by optometrists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 66% in 2001 to 44% in 2009. Among those seen exclusively by ophthalmologists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 65% in 2001 to 51% in 2009. The probability of undergoing OOI increased from 26% in 2001 to 47% in 2009 for patients of optometrists and from 30% in 2001 to 46% in 2009 for patients of ophthalmologists. By 2008, patients with OAG receiving care exclusively by optometrists had a higher probability of undergoing OOI than VF testing. Conclusions From 2001 to 2009, OOI increased dramatically whereas VF testing declined considerably. Because OOI has not been shown to be as effective at detecting OAG or disease progression compared with VF testing, increased reliance on OOI technology, in lieu of VF testing, may be detrimental to patient care. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. |
---|---|
AbstractList | PURPOSETo assess trends in the use of ancillary diagnostic tests in the evaluation of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspects over the past decade. DESIGNRetrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis. PARTICIPANTSA total of 169 917 individuals with OAG and 395 721 individuals with suspected glaucoma aged ≥40 years enrolled in a national United States managed care network between 2001 and 2009. METHODSClaims data were analyzed to assess trends in visual field (VF) testing, fundus photography (FP), and other ocular imaging (OOI) testing for patients with OAG or suspected glaucoma between 2001 and 2009. Repeated-measures logistic regression was performed to identify differences in the odds of undergoing these procedures in 2001, 2005, and 2009 and whether differences exist for patients under the exclusive care of optometrists versus ophthalmologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESOdds and annual probabilities of undergoing VF testing, FP, and OOI for OAG from 2001 to 2009. RESULTSFor patients with OAG, the odds of undergoing VF testing decreased by 36% from 2001 to 2005, by 12% from 2005 to 2009, and by 44% from 2001 to 2009. By comparison, the odds of having OOI increased by 100% from 2001 to 2005, by 24% from 2005 to 2009, and by 147% from 2001 to 2009. Probabilities of undergoing FP were relatively low (13%-25%) for both provider types and remained fairly steady over the decade. For patients cared for exclusively by optometrists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 66% in 2001 to 44% in 2009. Among those seen exclusively by ophthalmologists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 65% in 2001 to 51% in 2009. The probability of undergoing OOI increased from 26% in 2001 to 47% in 2009 for patients of optometrists and from 30% in 2001 to 46% in 2009 for patients of ophthalmologists. By 2008, patients with OAG receiving care exclusively by optometrists had a higher probability of undergoing OOI than VF testing. CONCLUSIONSFrom 2001 to 2009, OOI increased dramatically whereas VF testing declined considerably. Because OOI has not been shown to be as effective at detecting OAG or disease progression compared with VF testing, increased reliance on OOI technology, in lieu of VF testing, may be detrimental to patient care. Purpose To assess trends in the use of ancillary diagnostic tests in the evaluation of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspects over the past decade. Design Retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis. Participants A total of 169 917 individuals with OAG and 395 721 individuals with suspected glaucoma aged ≥40 years enrolled in a national United States managed care network between 2001 and 2009. Methods Claims data were analyzed to assess trends in visual field (VF) testing, fundus photography (FP), and other ocular imaging (OOI) testing for patients with OAG or suspected glaucoma between 2001 and 2009. Repeated-measures logistic regression was performed to identify differences in the odds of undergoing these procedures in 2001, 2005, and 2009 and whether differences exist for patients under the exclusive care of optometrists versus ophthalmologists. Main Outcome Measures Odds and annual probabilities of undergoing VF testing, FP, and OOI for OAG from 2001 to 2009. Results For patients with OAG, the odds of undergoing VF testing decreased by 36% from 2001 to 2005, by 12% from 2005 to 2009, and by 44% from 2001 to 2009. By comparison, the odds of having OOI increased by 100% from 2001 to 2005, by 24% from 2005 to 2009, and by 147% from 2001 to 2009. Probabilities of undergoing FP were relatively low (13%–25%) for both provider types and remained fairly steady over the decade. For patients cared for exclusively by optometrists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 66% in 2001 to 44% in 2009. Among those seen exclusively by ophthalmologists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 65% in 2001 to 51% in 2009. The probability of undergoing OOI increased from 26% in 2001 to 47% in 2009 for patients of optometrists and from 30% in 2001 to 46% in 2009 for patients of ophthalmologists. By 2008, patients with OAG receiving care exclusively by optometrists had a higher probability of undergoing OOI than VF testing. Conclusions From 2001 to 2009, OOI increased dramatically whereas VF testing declined considerably. Because OOI has not been shown to be as effective at detecting OAG or disease progression compared with VF testing, increased reliance on OOI technology, in lieu of VF testing, may be detrimental to patient care. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. To assess trends in the use of ancillary diagnostic tests in the evaluation of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspects over the past decade. Retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis. A total of 169 917 individuals with OAG and 395 721 individuals with suspected glaucoma aged ≥40 years enrolled in a national United States managed care network between 2001 and 2009. Claims data were analyzed to assess trends in visual field (VF) testing, fundus photography (FP), and other ocular imaging (OOI) testing for patients with OAG or suspected glaucoma between 2001 and 2009. Repeated-measures logistic regression was performed to identify differences in the odds of undergoing these procedures in 2001, 2005, and 2009 and whether differences exist for patients under the exclusive care of optometrists versus ophthalmologists. Odds and annual probabilities of undergoing VF testing, FP, and OOI for OAG from 2001 to 2009. For patients with OAG, the odds of undergoing VF testing decreased by 36% from 2001 to 2005, by 12% from 2005 to 2009, and by 44% from 2001 to 2009. By comparison, the odds of having OOI increased by 100% from 2001 to 2005, by 24% from 2005 to 2009, and by 147% from 2001 to 2009. Probabilities of undergoing FP were relatively low (13%-25%) for both provider types and remained fairly steady over the decade. For patients cared for exclusively by optometrists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 66% in 2001 to 44% in 2009. Among those seen exclusively by ophthalmologists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 65% in 2001 to 51% in 2009. The probability of undergoing OOI increased from 26% in 2001 to 47% in 2009 for patients of optometrists and from 30% in 2001 to 46% in 2009 for patients of ophthalmologists. By 2008, patients with OAG receiving care exclusively by optometrists had a higher probability of undergoing OOI than VF testing. From 2001 to 2009, OOI increased dramatically whereas VF testing declined considerably. Because OOI has not been shown to be as effective at detecting OAG or disease progression compared with VF testing, increased reliance on OOI technology, in lieu of VF testing, may be detrimental to patient care. To assess trends in the use of ancillary diagnostic tests in the evaluation of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspects over the past decade. Retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis. A total of 169 917 individuals with OAG and 395 721 individuals with suspected glaucoma aged ≥40 years enrolled in a national United States managed care network between 2001 and 2009. Claims data were analyzed to assess trends in visual field (VF) testing, fundus photography (FP), and other ocular imaging (OOI) testing for patients with OAG or suspected glaucoma between 2001 and 2009. Repeated-measures logistic regression was performed to identify differences in the odds of undergoing these procedures in 2001, 2005, and 2009 and whether differences exist for patients under the exclusive care of optometrists versus ophthalmologists. Odds and annual probabilities of undergoing VF testing, FP, and OOI for OAG from 2001 to 2009. For patients with OAG, the odds of undergoing VF testing decreased by 36% from 2001 to 2005, by 12% from 2005 to 2009, and by 44% from 2001 to 2009. By comparison, the odds of having OOI increased by 100% from 2001 to 2005, by 24% from 2005 to 2009, and by 147% from 2001 to 2009. Probabilities of undergoing FP were relatively low (13%–25%) for both provider types and remained fairly steady over the decade. For patients cared for exclusively by optometrists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 66% in 2001 to 44% in 2009. Among those seen exclusively by ophthalmologists, the probability of VF testing decreased from 65% in 2001 to 51% in 2009. The probability of undergoing OOI increased from 26% in 2001 to 47% in 2009 for patients of optometrists and from 30% in 2001 to 46% in 2009 for patients of ophthalmologists. By 2008, patients with OAG receiving care exclusively by optometrists had a higher probability of undergoing OOI than VF testing. From 2001 to 2009, OOI increased dramatically whereas VF testing declined considerably. Because OOI has not been shown to be as effective at detecting OAG or disease progression compared with VF testing, increased reliance on OOI technology, in lieu of VF testing, may be detrimental to patient care. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. |
Author | Lichter, Paul R., MD Stein, Joshua D., MD, MS Nan, Bin, PhD Talwar, Nidhi, MA LaVerne, Alejandra M., BS |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Stein, Joshua D., MD, MS – sequence: 2 fullname: Talwar, Nidhi, MA – sequence: 3 fullname: LaVerne, Alejandra M., BS – sequence: 4 fullname: Nan, Bin, PhD – sequence: 5 fullname: Lichter, Paul R., MD |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25948569$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22218146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFks-L1DAUgIOsuLOr_4FILuKp9b00TacXYVh0FRZWcDyHNH11MnaSMWmV_e9NmdEFL54ege_9-vKu2IUPnhh7iVAioHq7L8NxN-1MKQCxhLYEWT9hK6xlW8gGqwu2yhgWSgq4ZFcp7QFAqUo-Y5dCCFyjVCtmtpF8n7jz_GsiHga-8daNo4kP_HY0sw0Hw7eUpsSHEPlnMzny-fHLTTt-fyRfbPy3kR7ZIYYDFwDIp7DE9jl7Opgx0YtzvGbbD--3Nx-Lu_vbTzebu8LKVkxF0xmlSFLTkIIKkGqoqROdVXU31Kqphr5HKzqhLBlJRCi6QYK1VbekVNfszansMYYfcx5YH1yylDfxFOakW7VGaEFAJuWJtDGkFGnQx-gOeWGNoBe1eq9PavWiVkOrs9qc9urcYO4O1P9N-uMyA6_PgEnWjEM02WR65OpWrmvVZu7diaNs46ejqJPNUi31LpKddB_c_yb5t4AdnXe553d6oLQPc_TZtEadhAb9ZTmD5QoQ83dUqKrf5muuIw |
CODEN | OPHTDG |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2015_04_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2017_04_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2020_08_018 crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_12150 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2016_01_041 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xops_2021_100097 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_54792_w crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2016_309436 crossref_primary_10_1155_2015_746150 crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_10_6_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001262 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_46294_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2014_05_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2016_02_020 crossref_primary_10_1377_hlthaff_2015_1007 crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000002339 crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2018_0105 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40135_014_0049_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_genes12121961 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_survophthal_2020_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2015_307313 crossref_primary_10_12968_opti_2018_7_176348 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2015_10_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2021_04_022 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_80401_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2014_07_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2013_11_038 crossref_primary_10_1287_opre_2015_1405 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2018_11_003 crossref_primary_10_1080_08164622_2021_1965461 crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_11_3_36 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2023_07_020 crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_12_10_13 crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_11_3_18 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2019_09_036 crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000000149 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcto2020005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_survophthal_2016_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000000306 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.07.005 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31818159cb 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.014 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.02.030 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181b21f99 10.1097/01.ijg.0000159129.93085.96 10.1167/iovs.06-0545 10.3928/15428877-20080501-16 10.1167/iovs.09-3715 10.1167/iovs.05-1239 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318193c2be 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00792-X 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.07.010 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.09.034 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.013 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | American Academy of Ophthalmology 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: American Academy of Ophthalmology – notice: 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045 |
DatabaseName | Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1549-4713 |
EndPage | 758 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_ophtha_2011_09_045 22218146 25948569 S0161642011009316 1_s2_0_S0161642011009316 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GeographicLocations | United States |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: American Glaucoma Society Clinician Scientist – fundername: National Eye Institute K23 Mentored Clinician Scientist Award grantid: 1K23EY019511-01 – fundername: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation – fundername: Research to Prevent Blindness – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: 1K23EY019511-01 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: K23 EY019511 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: K23 EY019511-02 |
GroupedDBID | - 08R 0R 1- 123 1B1 1P 1~5 29N 4.4 457 4G. 53G 55 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M AAEDT AAIAV AALRI AALRV AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO ABFLS ABFRF ABIID ABLJU ABMAC ABOCM ABPTK ABQIS ABWYI ACGFO ACGFS ACIUM ACNCT ADPAM AEFWE AENEX AEVXI AFFNX AFRHN AFTJW AGZHU AITUG AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALXNB BELOY C5W CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FO GBLVA GJ HVGLF HZ IHE IPNFZ J1W K K-O KOM L7B M27 M41 MO0 N4W N9A NQ- O9- OF- OPF OQ P2P R2- RIG ROL RPZ SDG SEL SES SSZ UHS UNMZH UV1 WH7 X7M XH2 XPP Z5R ZA5 ZGI ZXP --- --K .1- .55 .FO .GJ 0R~ 1P~ AAEDW ABCQX ABJNI ADMUD AHPSJ AMRAJ HZ~ OQ~ AAUGY IQODW AKRWK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-7ba66e4e77e60301e505eb2bc65bf5673fdd1c2b26cea4eee12bf40cc3b77e63 |
ISSN | 0161-6420 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 21:33:40 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 03:15:25 EDT 2024 Thu May 23 23:14:49 EDT 2024 Sun Oct 22 16:05:43 EDT 2023 Fri Feb 23 02:22:15 EST 2024 Thu Aug 18 18:35:47 EDT 2022 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Glaucoma Human Protozoa Eye disease Open angle glaucoma Use Ciliata Ophthalmology |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c492t-7ba66e4e77e60301e505eb2bc65bf5673fdd1c2b26cea4eee12bf40cc3b77e63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3319788?pdf=render |
PMID | 22218146 |
PQID | 968109020 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_968109020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2011_09_045 pubmed_primary_22218146 pascalfrancis_primary_25948569 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ophtha_2011_09_045 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0161642011009316 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2012 text: 2012-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | New York, NY |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, NY – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ophthalmology |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier |
References | Deleón-Ortega, Arthur, McGwin (bib5) 2006; 47 (bib13) 2010 Lin, Singh, Jampel (bib15) 2007; 114 (bib14) 2010 Coleman, Yu, Rowe (bib9) 2005; 112 Park, Kim, Kee (bib16) 2005; 14 Schuman (bib11) 2008; 106 (bib8) 2006 Medeiros, Zangwill, Alencar (bib20) 2009; 50 Gardiner, Demirel (bib10) 2008; 115 Leung, Cheung, Weinreb (bib1) 2011; 118 Leung, Mohamed, Leung (bib17) 2006; 47 Ortega, Kakati, Girkin (bib18) 2009; 18 Rauscher, Sekhon, Feuer, Budenz (bib2) 2009; 18 Asrani, Edghill, Gupta, Meerhoff (bib3) 2010; 19 Jaffe, Caprioli (bib4) 2004; 137 Badalà, Nouri-Mahdavi, Raoof (bib6) 2007; 144 (bib7) 2006 Hillman (bib12) 1992 Siam, Gheith, de Barros (bib19) 2008; 39 Friedman, Nordstrom, Mozaffari, Quigley (bib21) 2005; 112 16039717 - Ophthalmology. 2005 Sep;112(9):1500-4 17908595 - Ophthalmology. 2007 Oct;114(10):1937-49 21093920 - Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):763-7 17868631 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;144(5):724-32 19295369 - J Glaucoma. 2009 Mar;18(3):186-91 19815731 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Dec;50(12):5741-8 15745765 - Ophthalmology. 2005 Mar;112(3):401-6 19277249 - Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2008;106:426-58 19661819 - J Glaucoma. 2010 Apr-May;19(4):237-42 15870603 - J Glaucoma. 2005 Jun;14(3):210-4 18556958 - Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008 May-Jun;39(3):262-4 19041473 - Ophthalmology. 2008 Dec;115(12):2127-31 14700659 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;137(1):156-69 16877405 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;47(8):3374-80 19745664 - J Glaucoma. 2009 Sep;18(7):501-5 17122099 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Dec;47(12):5171-6 (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib7) 2006 Hillman (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib12) 1992 Ortega (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib18) 2009; 18 Rauscher (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib2) 2009; 18 (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib8) 2006 Park (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib16) 2005; 14 Deleón-Ortega (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib5) 2006; 47 Siam (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib19) 2008; 39 Schuman (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib11) 2008; 106 Coleman (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib9) 2005; 112 (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib14) 2010 Leung (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib17) 2006; 47 Badalà (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib6) 2007; 144 (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib13) 2010 Friedman (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib21) 2005; 112 Jaffe (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib4) 2004; 137 Asrani (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib3) 2010; 19 Medeiros (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib20) 2009; 50 Lin (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib15) 2007; 114 Leung (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib1) 2011; 118 Gardiner (10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib10) 2008; 115 |
References_xml | – volume: 47 start-page: 3374 year: 2006 end-page: 3380 ident: bib5 article-title: Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci contributor: fullname: McGwin – start-page: 12 year: 2010 ident: bib14 article-title: Preferred Practice Pattern – volume: 115 start-page: 2127 year: 2008 end-page: 2131 ident: bib10 article-title: Assessment of patient opinions of different clinical tests used in the management of glaucoma publication-title: Ophthalmology contributor: fullname: Demirel – volume: 106 start-page: 426 year: 2008 end-page: 458 ident: bib11 article-title: Spectral domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma (an AOS thesis) publication-title: Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc contributor: fullname: Schuman – volume: 18 start-page: 501 year: 2009 end-page: 505 ident: bib2 article-title: Myopia affects retinal nerve fiber layer measurements as determined by optical coherence tomography publication-title: J Glaucoma contributor: fullname: Budenz – year: 2006 ident: bib7 article-title: Physician ICD-9-CM 2006 – volume: 137 start-page: 156 year: 2004 end-page: 169 ident: bib4 article-title: Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol contributor: fullname: Caprioli – volume: 144 start-page: 724 year: 2007 end-page: 732 ident: bib6 article-title: Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol contributor: fullname: Raoof – volume: 39 start-page: 262 year: 2008 end-page: 264 ident: bib19 article-title: Limitations of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph publication-title: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging contributor: fullname: de Barros – volume: 50 start-page: 5741 year: 2009 end-page: 5748 ident: bib20 article-title: Detection of glaucoma progression with Stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci contributor: fullname: Alencar – volume: 18 start-page: 186 year: 2009 end-page: 191 ident: bib18 article-title: Artifacts on the optic nerve head analysis of the optical coherence tomography in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes publication-title: J Glaucoma contributor: fullname: Girkin – year: 2006 ident: bib8 article-title: CPT 2006 – volume: 14 start-page: 210 year: 2005 end-page: 214 ident: bib16 article-title: Evaluation of the influence of tilt of optic disc on the measurement of optic disc variables obtained by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy publication-title: J Glaucoma contributor: fullname: Kee – volume: 118 start-page: 763 year: 2011 end-page: 767 ident: bib1 article-title: Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a comparison between the fast and the regular retinal nerve fiber layer scans publication-title: Ophthalmology contributor: fullname: Weinreb – volume: 112 start-page: 401 year: 2005 end-page: 406 ident: bib9 article-title: Visual field testing in glaucoma Medicare beneficiaries before surgery publication-title: Ophthalmology contributor: fullname: Rowe – volume: 114 start-page: 1937 year: 2007 end-page: 1949 ident: bib15 article-title: Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology publication-title: Ophthalmology contributor: fullname: Jampel – start-page: 133 year: 1992 end-page: 149 ident: bib12 article-title: Physicians' acquisition and use of new technology in an era of economic constraints publication-title: Technology and Health Care in an Era of Limits contributor: fullname: Hillman – volume: 112 start-page: 1500 year: 2005 end-page: 1504 ident: bib21 article-title: Glaucoma management among individuals enrolled in a single comprehensive insurance plan publication-title: Ophthalmology contributor: fullname: Quigley – volume: 47 start-page: 5171 year: 2006 end-page: 5176 ident: bib17 article-title: Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in myopia: an optical coherence tomography study publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci contributor: fullname: Leung – volume: 19 start-page: 237 year: 2010 end-page: 242 ident: bib3 article-title: Optical coherence tomography errors in glaucoma publication-title: J Glaucoma contributor: fullname: Meerhoff – start-page: 32 year: 2010 ident: bib13 article-title: Preferred Practice Pattern – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib7 – volume: 114 start-page: 1937 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib15 article-title: Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.07.005 contributor: fullname: Lin – volume: 106 start-page: 426 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib11 article-title: Spectral domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma (an AOS thesis) publication-title: Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc contributor: fullname: Schuman – start-page: 12 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib14 article-title: Preferred Practice Pattern – volume: 18 start-page: 186 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib18 article-title: Artifacts on the optic nerve head analysis of the optical coherence tomography in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes publication-title: J Glaucoma doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31818159cb contributor: fullname: Ortega – volume: 118 start-page: 763 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib1 article-title: Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a comparison between the fast and the regular retinal nerve fiber layer scans publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.014 contributor: fullname: Leung – start-page: 32 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib13 article-title: Preferred Practice Pattern – volume: 112 start-page: 1500 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib21 article-title: Glaucoma management among individuals enrolled in a single comprehensive insurance plan publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.02.030 contributor: fullname: Friedman – volume: 19 start-page: 237 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib3 article-title: Optical coherence tomography errors in glaucoma publication-title: J Glaucoma doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181b21f99 contributor: fullname: Asrani – volume: 14 start-page: 210 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib16 article-title: Evaluation of the influence of tilt of optic disc on the measurement of optic disc variables obtained by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy publication-title: J Glaucoma doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000159129.93085.96 contributor: fullname: Park – volume: 47 start-page: 5171 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib17 article-title: Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in myopia: an optical coherence tomography study publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0545 contributor: fullname: Leung – volume: 39 start-page: 262 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib19 article-title: Limitations of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph publication-title: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging doi: 10.3928/15428877-20080501-16 contributor: fullname: Siam – volume: 50 start-page: 5741 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib20 article-title: Detection of glaucoma progression with Stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3715 contributor: fullname: Medeiros – volume: 47 start-page: 3374 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib5 article-title: Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1239 contributor: fullname: Deleón-Ortega – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib8 – volume: 18 start-page: 501 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib2 article-title: Myopia affects retinal nerve fiber layer measurements as determined by optical coherence tomography publication-title: J Glaucoma doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318193c2be contributor: fullname: Rauscher – volume: 137 start-page: 156 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib4 article-title: Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00792-X contributor: fullname: Jaffe – volume: 144 start-page: 724 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib6 article-title: Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.07.010 contributor: fullname: Badalà – start-page: 133 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib12 article-title: Physicians' acquisition and use of new technology in an era of economic constraints contributor: fullname: Hillman – volume: 112 start-page: 401 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib9 article-title: Visual field testing in glaucoma Medicare beneficiaries before surgery publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.09.034 contributor: fullname: Coleman – volume: 115 start-page: 2127 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045_bib10 article-title: Assessment of patient opinions of different clinical tests used in the management of glaucoma publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.013 contributor: fullname: Gardiner |
SSID | ssj0006634 |
Score | 2.3163278 |
Snippet | Purpose To assess trends in the use of ancillary diagnostic tests in the evaluation of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspects over the... To assess trends in the use of ancillary diagnostic tests in the evaluation of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspects over the past... PURPOSETo assess trends in the use of ancillary diagnostic tests in the evaluation of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspects over the... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed pascalfrancis elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 748 |
SubjectTerms | Biological and medical sciences Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological - trends Female Fluorescein Angiography - trends Follow-Up Studies Glaucoma and intraocular pressure Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis Humans Male Managed Care Programs - statistics & numerical data Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis Odds Ratio Ophthalmology Ophthalmology - trends Optometry - trends Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends Retrospective Studies Tomography, Optical Coherence - trends United States - epidemiology Visual Field Tests - trends |
Title | Trends in Use of Ancillary Glaucoma Tests for Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma from 2001 to 2009 |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0161642011009316 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.045 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22218146 https://search.proquest.com/docview/968109020 |
Volume | 119 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bjtMwELXKroSQEOJOuaz8wFuVKnESp3ks19WuWiTowr5ZjuPQViWpmlQIfoTfZSZ2kpZlgeWlraLYST0n4_HkzDEhz5WbqFEYpE7mZb4TBDpwYh1ljlQQO3t6FKcca4cnU358Fpych-e93o8d1tK2Sobq-2_rSv7HqnAM7IpVslewbNspHIDfYF_4BAvD57_ZuCW0npmU_DhXuIvQ5tvg7Upu4ZJyMAO3X2suoBr_oqtnQyaJM84_r3R3bl1rgvQnjEjxhcZu6PpuPa_mcvXFiDbVmQe72Zah3-f5cCet8KHZRfOkKOdbOXg17HIEq6-G1T1dpPNFywiSH3WTXl3ppczTjRxM2lZTk6h9YYXCbZ4CCR8tvcWmLrnnwGrH3fO91l8udjMLtSeNjACnnZQjo-9-wd-b1MNyWNRDYBVZ46FrJCr35bV_mfZaMmLDc1sK04vAXoQbC-jlGjlkURzCqv5wfPr-02k7yUOgZmXjzZ9qqjJr6uDFu7ks6rm5liU8i5nZROXyVU4d7cxuk1t2mULHBnN3SE_nd8n1iSVi3CPSQI8ucgrQo0VGW-jRBk60hh4F6NEGehShRzvodeci9ChCj1YFfsf3yezN69nLY8fu1uGoIGaVEyWScx3oKNIc19kaYmudsETxMMlCHvlZmnqKJYwrLQOttceSLHCV8hNs4j8gB3mR60eEah2mPngWlUYMN8iTWmUskkxxHSZspPrEaQZTrI0mi_iTEfskakZcNPXGMEPq0j7KpfBEyYSLTEfuoTVRRzH2Pb7b0kakJtIUAMC_XPNoz7TtjTLURwp53Ce0sbUAj46v6WSui20pYpQIjGEZ1ycPDQa6xgwj8oA_vuIIPCE3ukfyKTmoNlv9DILpKjmywP4JaDjHSQ |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,27957,27958 |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends+in+Use+of+Ancillary+Glaucoma+Tests+for+Patients+with+Open-Angle+Glaucoma+from+2001+to+2009&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology+%28Rochester%2C+Minn.%29&rft.au=Stein%2C+Joshua+D.&rft.au=Talwar%2C+Nidhi&rft.au=LaVerne%2C+Alejandra+M.&rft.au=Nan%2C+Bin&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=748&rft.epage=758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ophtha.2011.09.045&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_ophtha_2011_09_045 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F01616420%2FS0161642011X00155%2Fcov150h.gif |