Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a possible choice for patients with resistant thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer treatments
Background Thin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some studies have reported promoted endometrial growth after a period of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with intrauterine adhesion, th...
Saved in:
Published in | Reproductive biology and endocrinology Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
01.09.2023
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background Thin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some studies have reported promoted endometrial growth after a period of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with intrauterine adhesion, there have been no reports in patients with resistant thin endometrium. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of HBOT on endometrium growth and pregnancy outcomes in patients with resistant thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer (FET) treatments. Methods This prospective pre-post cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated assisted reproductive medical center between October 2021 and December 2022. Patients who had experienced at least one canceled transfer cycle due to a thin endometrium(< 7 mm) on the endometrium transformation day, despite the use of standard therapies as well as adjuvant therapies, were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned voluntarily to either the HBOT group or the concurrent control group. The HBOT group received daily HBOT for at least 10 days during the proliferative phase, in addition to the routine endometrium preparation methods and the concurrent control group underwent cycles without HBOT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparability between the groups. Both self-control and case-control comparisons were conducted. The primary outcome measured was endometrial thickness (ET) on the day of endometrium transformation. Secondary outcomes included intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR), embryo implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate, and others. Results Patients in the HBOT group demonstrated a significantly thicker endometrial thickness on the day of endometrium transformation after undergoing therapy (5.76 [+ or -] 1.66 vs. 6.57 [+ or -] 1.23, P = 0.002). This improvement was accompanied by a decreased rate of cycle cancellations. Baseline parameters and endometrial thickness were comparable between the HBOT group and the concurrent control group during the cycle. The IPR was similar in patients who received cleavage-stage embryos (0.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 1.00), but significantly higher in patients in the HBOT group who received blastocysts (53.8% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.017). Conclusions A period of HBOT prior to endometrium transformation contributes to increased endometrial thickness and facilitates blastocyst implantation in patients with resistant thin endometrium during FET treatments. Trial registration The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration no. ChiCTR2300072831, retrospectively registered). Keywords: Resistant thin endometrium, Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, Frozen embryo transfer, Asherman syndrome |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Background Thin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some studies have reported promoted endometrial growth after a period of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with intrauterine adhesion, there have been no reports in patients with resistant thin endometrium. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of HBOT on endometrium growth and pregnancy outcomes in patients with resistant thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer (FET) treatments. Methods This prospective pre-post cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated assisted reproductive medical center between October 2021 and December 2022. Patients who had experienced at least one canceled transfer cycle due to a thin endometrium(< 7 mm) on the endometrium transformation day, despite the use of standard therapies as well as adjuvant therapies, were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned voluntarily to either the HBOT group or the concurrent control group. The HBOT group received daily HBOT for at least 10 days during the proliferative phase, in addition to the routine endometrium preparation methods and the concurrent control group underwent cycles without HBOT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparability between the groups. Both self-control and case-control comparisons were conducted. The primary outcome measured was endometrial thickness (ET) on the day of endometrium transformation. Secondary outcomes included intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR), embryo implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate, and others. Results Patients in the HBOT group demonstrated a significantly thicker endometrial thickness on the day of endometrium transformation after undergoing therapy (5.76 ± 1.66 vs. 6.57 ± 1.23, P = 0.002). This improvement was accompanied by a decreased rate of cycle cancellations. Baseline parameters and endometrial thickness were comparable between the HBOT group and the concurrent control group during the cycle. The IPR was similar in patients who received cleavage-stage embryos (0.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 1.00), but significantly higher in patients in the HBOT group who received blastocysts (53.8% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.017). Conclusions A period of HBOT prior to endometrium transformation contributes to increased endometrial thickness and facilitates blastocyst implantation in patients with resistant thin endometrium during FET treatments. Trial registration The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration no. ChiCTR2300072831, retrospectively registered). Thin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some studies have reported promoted endometrial growth after a period of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with intrauterine adhesion, there have been no reports in patients with resistant thin endometrium. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of HBOT on endometrium growth and pregnancy outcomes in patients with resistant thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer (FET) treatments. This prospective pre-post cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated assisted reproductive medical center between October 2021 and December 2022. Patients who had experienced at least one canceled transfer cycle due to a thin endometrium(< 7 mm) on the endometrium transformation day, despite the use of standard therapies as well as adjuvant therapies, were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned voluntarily to either the HBOT group or the concurrent control group. The HBOT group received daily HBOT for at least 10 days during the proliferative phase, in addition to the routine endometrium preparation methods and the concurrent control group underwent cycles without HBOT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparability between the groups. Both self-control and case-control comparisons were conducted. The primary outcome measured was endometrial thickness (ET) on the day of endometrium transformation. Secondary outcomes included intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR), embryo implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate, and others. A period of HBOT prior to endometrium transformation contributes to increased endometrial thickness and facilitates blastocyst implantation in patients with resistant thin endometrium during FET treatments. Thin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some studies have reported promoted endometrial growth after a period of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with intrauterine adhesion, there have been no reports in patients with resistant thin endometrium. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of HBOT on endometrium growth and pregnancy outcomes in patients with resistant thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer (FET) treatments.BACKGROUNDThin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some studies have reported promoted endometrial growth after a period of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with intrauterine adhesion, there have been no reports in patients with resistant thin endometrium. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of HBOT on endometrium growth and pregnancy outcomes in patients with resistant thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer (FET) treatments.This prospective pre-post cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated assisted reproductive medical center between October 2021 and December 2022. Patients who had experienced at least one canceled transfer cycle due to a thin endometrium(< 7 mm) on the endometrium transformation day, despite the use of standard therapies as well as adjuvant therapies, were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned voluntarily to either the HBOT group or the concurrent control group. The HBOT group received daily HBOT for at least 10 days during the proliferative phase, in addition to the routine endometrium preparation methods and the concurrent control group underwent cycles without HBOT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparability between the groups. Both self-control and case-control comparisons were conducted. The primary outcome measured was endometrial thickness (ET) on the day of endometrium transformation. Secondary outcomes included intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR), embryo implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate, and others.METHODSThis prospective pre-post cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated assisted reproductive medical center between October 2021 and December 2022. Patients who had experienced at least one canceled transfer cycle due to a thin endometrium(< 7 mm) on the endometrium transformation day, despite the use of standard therapies as well as adjuvant therapies, were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned voluntarily to either the HBOT group or the concurrent control group. The HBOT group received daily HBOT for at least 10 days during the proliferative phase, in addition to the routine endometrium preparation methods and the concurrent control group underwent cycles without HBOT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparability between the groups. Both self-control and case-control comparisons were conducted. The primary outcome measured was endometrial thickness (ET) on the day of endometrium transformation. Secondary outcomes included intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR), embryo implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate, and others.Patients in the HBOT group demonstrated a significantly thicker endometrial thickness on the day of endometrium transformation after undergoing therapy (5.76 ± 1.66 vs. 6.57 ± 1.23, P = 0.002). This improvement was accompanied by a decreased rate of cycle cancellations. Baseline parameters and endometrial thickness were comparable between the HBOT group and the concurrent control group during the cycle. The IPR was similar in patients who received cleavage-stage embryos (0.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 1.00), but significantly higher in patients in the HBOT group who received blastocysts (53.8% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.017).RESULTSPatients in the HBOT group demonstrated a significantly thicker endometrial thickness on the day of endometrium transformation after undergoing therapy (5.76 ± 1.66 vs. 6.57 ± 1.23, P = 0.002). This improvement was accompanied by a decreased rate of cycle cancellations. Baseline parameters and endometrial thickness were comparable between the HBOT group and the concurrent control group during the cycle. The IPR was similar in patients who received cleavage-stage embryos (0.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 1.00), but significantly higher in patients in the HBOT group who received blastocysts (53.8% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.017).A period of HBOT prior to endometrium transformation contributes to increased endometrial thickness and facilitates blastocyst implantation in patients with resistant thin endometrium during FET treatments.CONCLUSIONSA period of HBOT prior to endometrium transformation contributes to increased endometrial thickness and facilitates blastocyst implantation in patients with resistant thin endometrium during FET treatments.The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration no. ChiCTR2300072831, retrospectively registered).TRIAL REGISTRATIONThe trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration no. ChiCTR2300072831, retrospectively registered). BackgroundThin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some studies have reported promoted endometrial growth after a period of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with intrauterine adhesion, there have been no reports in patients with resistant thin endometrium. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of HBOT on endometrium growth and pregnancy outcomes in patients with resistant thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer (FET) treatments.MethodsThis prospective pre-post cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated assisted reproductive medical center between October 2021 and December 2022. Patients who had experienced at least one canceled transfer cycle due to a thin endometrium(< 7 mm) on the endometrium transformation day, despite the use of standard therapies as well as adjuvant therapies, were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned voluntarily to either the HBOT group or the concurrent control group. The HBOT group received daily HBOT for at least 10 days during the proliferative phase, in addition to the routine endometrium preparation methods and the concurrent control group underwent cycles without HBOT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparability between the groups. Both self-control and case-control comparisons were conducted. The primary outcome measured was endometrial thickness (ET) on the day of endometrium transformation. Secondary outcomes included intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR), embryo implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate, and others.ResultsPatients in the HBOT group demonstrated a significantly thicker endometrial thickness on the day of endometrium transformation after undergoing therapy (5.76 ± 1.66 vs. 6.57 ± 1.23, P = 0.002). This improvement was accompanied by a decreased rate of cycle cancellations. Baseline parameters and endometrial thickness were comparable between the HBOT group and the concurrent control group during the cycle. The IPR was similar in patients who received cleavage-stage embryos (0.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 1.00), but significantly higher in patients in the HBOT group who received blastocysts (53.8% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.017).ConclusionsA period of HBOT prior to endometrium transformation contributes to increased endometrial thickness and facilitates blastocyst implantation in patients with resistant thin endometrium during FET treatments.Trial registrationThe trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration no. ChiCTR2300072831, retrospectively registered). Background Thin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some studies have reported promoted endometrial growth after a period of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with intrauterine adhesion, there have been no reports in patients with resistant thin endometrium. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of HBOT on endometrium growth and pregnancy outcomes in patients with resistant thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer (FET) treatments. Methods This prospective pre-post cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated assisted reproductive medical center between October 2021 and December 2022. Patients who had experienced at least one canceled transfer cycle due to a thin endometrium(< 7 mm) on the endometrium transformation day, despite the use of standard therapies as well as adjuvant therapies, were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned voluntarily to either the HBOT group or the concurrent control group. The HBOT group received daily HBOT for at least 10 days during the proliferative phase, in addition to the routine endometrium preparation methods and the concurrent control group underwent cycles without HBOT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparability between the groups. Both self-control and case-control comparisons were conducted. The primary outcome measured was endometrial thickness (ET) on the day of endometrium transformation. Secondary outcomes included intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR), embryo implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate, and others. Results Patients in the HBOT group demonstrated a significantly thicker endometrial thickness on the day of endometrium transformation after undergoing therapy (5.76 [+ or -] 1.66 vs. 6.57 [+ or -] 1.23, P = 0.002). This improvement was accompanied by a decreased rate of cycle cancellations. Baseline parameters and endometrial thickness were comparable between the HBOT group and the concurrent control group during the cycle. The IPR was similar in patients who received cleavage-stage embryos (0.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 1.00), but significantly higher in patients in the HBOT group who received blastocysts (53.8% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.017). Conclusions A period of HBOT prior to endometrium transformation contributes to increased endometrial thickness and facilitates blastocyst implantation in patients with resistant thin endometrium during FET treatments. Trial registration The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration no. ChiCTR2300072831, retrospectively registered). Keywords: Resistant thin endometrium, Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, Frozen embryo transfer, Asherman syndrome |
ArticleNumber | 80 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Xu, Bin Zhao, Jianjuan Li, Shuyi Chen, Jingjing Zhang, Qiong Zhao, Jing Li, Yanping Liang, Shaolin Huang, Fangling Li, Jinsheng Fu, Jing Peng, Zhengrong |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jingjing surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Jingjing – sequence: 2 givenname: Fangling surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Fangling – sequence: 3 givenname: Jing surname: Fu fullname: Fu, Jing – sequence: 4 givenname: Jianjuan surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Jianjuan – sequence: 5 givenname: Jinsheng surname: Li fullname: Li, Jinsheng – sequence: 6 givenname: Zhengrong surname: Peng fullname: Peng, Zhengrong – sequence: 7 givenname: Jing surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Jing – sequence: 8 givenname: Bin surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Bin – sequence: 9 givenname: Shuyi surname: Li fullname: Li, Shuyi – sequence: 10 givenname: Qiong surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Qiong – sequence: 11 givenname: Shaolin surname: Liang fullname: Liang, Shaolin – sequence: 12 givenname: Yanping surname: Li fullname: Li, Yanping |
BookMark | eNptkk1v1DAQhiNUJNrCH-BkiQuXFH8ltrmgqgJaqRKX3i3HHu96ldjBToDtkV-Ot1sBRciSPRq_84zGfs-ak5giNM1rgi8Ikf27QqjqZIspazEhdefPmlPChWiFpOLkr_hFc1bKDmOKsexPm5_X-xnyYHKwKP3YbyCiZQvZzPv3yKA5lRKGEZDdpmAB-ZTRbJYAcSnoe1i2KEMJZTFxqWUhIoguTbDksE7IrTnEDfI53VcqTEPeJ7RkE4uHXAMwy3QAvWyeezMWePV4njd3nz7eXV23t18-31xd3raWK7q0XCjqsXNOqp4YNQx-YF0HoCSjUnrFOsI9EaIbvBdAXW9dLzuHJWGOK8HOm5sj1iWz03MOk8l7nUzQD4mUN9rkJdgRNDNUSS6IEhRzJrlSnQUKDAYKHEBW1ocja16HCZytY2QzPoE-vYlhqzfpmyaYCyoYr4S3j4Scvq5QFj2FYmEcTYS0Fk1ljznmvCNV-uYf6S6tOdanOqg63mHM5R_VxtQJQvSpNrYHqL4UPav_3QlWVRf_UdXlYAq2esqHmn9SQI8FNlcvZPC_hyRYH6ynj9bT1Xr6wXqas1-P9c9a |
Cites_doi | 10.1001/archsurg.135.11.1293 10.1186/1477-7827-8-30 10.1007/s11357-022-00707-z 10.2147/DDDT.S281451 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062322 10.1093/humrep/des370 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.05.011 10.3390/biomedicines10123145 10.1002/advs.202100233 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.029 10.1186/s13287-021-02499-z 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.12.016 10.3390/jcm12010308 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1966 10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5 10.17305/bjbms.2006.3168 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.062 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.101 10.1093/humrep/der037 10.2147/DDDT.S297236 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.031 10.1007/s12576-019-00678-5 10.1093/humrep/15.suppl_2.199 10.1159/000516749 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1550 10.1093/humrep/deaa248 10.1136/jitc-2021-004006 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1096 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.09.005 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.12.006 10.4103/0974-1208.178632 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00634.x 10.1093/humupd/dmu011 10.1007/s00520-022-06994-8 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103796 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.077 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.009 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58082-0 10.1016/j.placenta.2018.03.003 10.1089/ars.2014.5940 10.1097/MD.0000000000009689 10.1007/978-3-319-47140-2_2 10.1007/s10815-006-9053-1 10.4103/2045-9912.310057 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. – notice: BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QG 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AN0 AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12958-023-01123-4 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest British Nursing Database ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition British Nursing Index with Full Text ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Animal Behavior Abstracts ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1477-7827 |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_3a29847197204384995ce2e3eb2e4ee8 PMC10472734 A763020573 10_1186_s12958_023_01123_4 |
GeographicLocations | China United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China – name: United States--US |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; grantid: 202203104548 – fundername: ; grantid: 2021YFC2700404; 2021YFC2700404; 2021YFC2700404; 2021YFC2700404; 2021YFC2700404; 2021YFC2700404; 2021YFC2700404 – fundername: ; grantid: 2021SK2028; 2021SK2028; 2021SK2028; 2021SK2028; 2021SK2028; 2021SK2028; 2021SK2028 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29P 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AN0 AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BNQBC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO ICW IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB PMFND 3V. 7QG 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-4792f0ddd8961a9bbfb355ee983288f93514f1775bff7e2d6cd685d0813d4973 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1477-7827 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:03 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:36:16 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 16:11:35 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 22:02:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:22:03 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:16:51 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:45:10 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c492t-4792f0ddd8961a9bbfb355ee983288f93514f1775bff7e2d6cd685d0813d4973 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/3a29847197204384995ce2e3eb2e4ee8 |
PQID | 2865450048 |
PQPubID | 42860 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3a29847197204384995ce2e3eb2e4ee8 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10472734 proquest_miscellaneous_2860404451 proquest_journals_2865450048 gale_infotracmisc_A763020573 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A763020573 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12958_023_01123_4 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2023 text: 2023-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Reproductive biology and endocrinology |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | SL Chen (1123_CR5) 2010; 8 BJ Van Voorhis (1123_CR20) 2005; 83 XX Chen (1123_CR45) 2023; 13 A Ishihara (1123_CR19) 2019; 69 X Liu (1123_CR43) 2021; 8 GK Velure (1123_CR47) 2022; 30 DK Gardner (1123_CR27) 2019; 112 K Ben (1123_CR48) 2020; 35 Y Zhang (1123_CR14) 2021; 12 T Zhang (1123_CR3) 2018; 97 AY Sheikh (1123_CR42) 2000; 135 K Li (1123_CR44) 2022; 10 N Gleicher (1123_CR12) 2013; 28 J Lindenmann (1123_CR39) 2022; 10 T El-Toukhy (1123_CR34) 2008; 89 MH Schoots (1123_CR37) 2018; 69 J Yuan (1123_CR41) 2009; 1787 JW Catt (1123_CR36) 2000; 15 1123_CR25 A Takasaki (1123_CR26) 2010; 93 D Glujovsky (1123_CR35) 2020; 10 Y Chang (1123_CR13) 2023; 156 R Israel (1123_CR4) 1996; 65 MJ Chen (1123_CR7) 2006; 23 A Mitrović (1123_CR22) 2006; 6 A Kasius (1123_CR29) 2014; 20 P Sundström (1123_CR33) 1998; 13 JH Check (1123_CR1) 2003; 30 D Kitala (1123_CR46) 2022; 12 KM Fosen (1123_CR40) 2014; 21 A Mitrović (1123_CR21) 2006; 46 J Leverment (1123_CR23) 2004; 31 W Feng (1123_CR8) 2021; 15 Y Tao (1123_CR10) 2020; 14 P Mensah-Kane (1123_CR18) 2023; 45 W Zakrzewski (1123_CR15) 2019; 10 J Zhao (1123_CR6) 2014; 29 B Xu (1123_CR11) 2015; 30 I Miwa (1123_CR32) 2009; 91 1123_CR16 D Zhou (1123_CR17) 2023; 59 1123_CR38 G Gao (1123_CR2) 2020; 40 RF Casper (1123_CR24) 2021; 96 X Li (1123_CR9) 2021; 86 L Dain (1123_CR31) 2013; 100 VC Ribeiro (1123_CR30) 2018; 36 N Mahajan (1123_CR28) 2016; 9 |
References_xml | – volume: 135 start-page: 1293 issue: 11 year: 2000 ident: 1123_CR42 publication-title: Arch Surg doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.11.1293 – volume: 8 start-page: 30 year: 2010 ident: 1123_CR5 publication-title: Reprod Biol Endocrinol doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-30 – volume: 45 start-page: 747 issue: 2 year: 2023 ident: 1123_CR18 publication-title: Geroscience doi: 10.1007/s11357-022-00707-z – volume: 14 start-page: 5289 year: 2020 ident: 1123_CR10 publication-title: Drug Des Devel Ther doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S281451 – volume: 13 start-page: e062322 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 1123_CR45 publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062322 – volume: 28 start-page: 172 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 1123_CR12 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/des370 – volume: 29 start-page: 291 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 1123_CR6 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.05.011 – volume: 10 start-page: 3145 issue: 12 year: 2022 ident: 1123_CR39 publication-title: Biomedicines doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123145 – volume: 8 start-page: e2100233 issue: 15 year: 2021 ident: 1123_CR43 publication-title: Adv Sci (Weinh) doi: 10.1002/advs.202100233 – volume: 91 start-page: 998 issue: 4 year: 2009 ident: 1123_CR32 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.029 – volume: 12 start-page: 420 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 1123_CR14 publication-title: Stem Cell Res Ther doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02499-z – volume: 36 start-page: 416 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 1123_CR30 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.12.016 – volume: 12 start-page: 308 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 1123_CR46 publication-title: J Clin Med doi: 10.3390/jcm12010308 – volume: 30 start-page: 93 issue: 2–3 year: 2003 ident: 1123_CR1 publication-title: Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol – volume: 100 start-page: 1289 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: 1123_CR31 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1966 – volume: 31 start-page: 245 issue: 2 year: 2004 ident: 1123_CR23 publication-title: Undersea Hyperb Med – volume: 10 start-page: CD006359 issue: 10 year: 2020 ident: 1123_CR35 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 10 start-page: 68 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1123_CR15 publication-title: Stem Cell Res Ther doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5 – volume: 6 start-page: 21 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 1123_CR22 publication-title: Bosn J Basic Med Sci doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2006.3168 – volume: 93 start-page: 1851 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 1123_CR26 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.062 – volume: 83 start-page: 226 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 1123_CR20 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.101 – ident: 1123_CR25 doi: 10.1093/humrep/der037 – volume: 15 start-page: 1521 year: 2021 ident: 1123_CR8 publication-title: Drug Des Devel Ther doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S297236 – volume: 89 start-page: 832 issue: 4 year: 2008 ident: 1123_CR34 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.031 – volume: 69 start-page: 573 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 1123_CR19 publication-title: J Physiol Sci doi: 10.1007/s12576-019-00678-5 – volume: 15 start-page: 199 issue: suppl 2 year: 2000 ident: 1123_CR36 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.suppl_2.199 – volume: 86 start-page: 307 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 1123_CR9 publication-title: Gynecol Obstet Invest doi: 10.1159/000516749 – volume: 13 start-page: 1550 issue: 6 year: 1998 ident: 1123_CR33 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1550 – volume: 35 start-page: 2774 issue: 12 year: 2020 ident: 1123_CR48 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa248 – volume: 10 start-page: e004006 issue: 8 year: 2022 ident: 1123_CR44 publication-title: J Immunother Cancer doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004006 – volume: 96 start-page: 519 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 1123_CR24 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1096 – volume: 40 start-page: 124 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 1123_CR2 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.09.005 – volume: 30 start-page: 349 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 1123_CR11 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.12.006 – volume: 9 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 1123_CR28 publication-title: J Hum Reprod Sci doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.178632 – volume: 46 start-page: 456 issue: 5 year: 2006 ident: 1123_CR21 publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00634.x – volume: 20 start-page: 530 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 1123_CR29 publication-title: Hum Reprod Update doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu011 – volume: 30 start-page: 5703 issue: 7 year: 2022 ident: 1123_CR47 publication-title: Support Care Cancer doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06994-8 – volume: 59 start-page: 762 issue: 4 year: 2023 ident: 1123_CR17 publication-title: Med (Kaunas) – volume: 156 start-page: 103796 issue: March year: 2023 ident: 1123_CR13 publication-title: J Reprod Immunol doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103796 – volume: 112 start-page: e81 issue: 4 Suppl1 year: 2019 ident: 1123_CR27 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.077 – volume: 1787 start-page: 828 issue: 7 year: 2009 ident: 1123_CR41 publication-title: Biochim Biophys Acta doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.009 – volume: 65 start-page: 262 issue: 2 year: 1996 ident: 1123_CR4 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58082-0 – volume: 69 start-page: 153 year: 2018 ident: 1123_CR37 publication-title: Placenta doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2018.03.003 – volume: 21 start-page: 1634 issue: 11 year: 2014 ident: 1123_CR40 publication-title: Antioxid Redox Signal doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.5940 – volume: 97 start-page: e9689 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 1123_CR3 publication-title: Med (Baltim) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009689 – ident: 1123_CR38 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47140-2_2 – volume: 23 start-page: 337 issue: 7–8 year: 2006 ident: 1123_CR7 publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9053-1 – ident: 1123_CR16 doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.310057 |
SSID | ssj0020086 |
Score | 2.3693733 |
Snippet | Background Thin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some... Thin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some studies have... BackgroundThin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies. While some... Abstract Background Thin endometrium is considered suboptimal for embryo implantation, leading to compromised pregnancy rates without effective therapies.... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Asherman syndrome Blastocysts Care and treatment Complications and side effects Embryo transfer Embryo transplantation Embryos Endometriosis Endometrium Estrogens Frozen embryo transfer Hormone replacement therapy Hospitals Hyperbaric oxygen therapy Hyperbaric oxygenation Implantation Infertility Ovulation Oxygen therapy Patient outcomes Patients Platelet-rich plasma therapy Pregnancy Reproductive health Resistant thin endometrium Thoracic surgery Ultrasonic imaging Uterus |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF5VPXGpgFJhKNUgofZQWU28a3u3t4CoIiR6aqXeVt6XiETWVeJIhCO_nJm1E9Vw4MI1u46cndc3m5lvGPsgg6DxNy5vMLjnwiqRK2t5Hiw3zcQHq9I4n6-31fxefHkoH56M-qKasJ4euD-4K94UijyoomkqXCJAL60vPMeM0AvvU5svxrxdMjWkWoTUdy0ysrpaY1QrZY7xCVNn9NW5GIWhxNb_t0_-s07ySeC5ec6OBsQIs_5NX7ADH1-y41nEbHm5hXNINZzpcvyY_ZpjWkl_ICwstD-2qBzQN1htr6GBx5YM4LsHdHnoHwDxKgy8qmugC1nA3JvwZOzwsUUEH127pJFbmyX0_YwQVu1P_Fa_NKttC12CvX4F-3r19St2d_P57tM8H6Ys5FaooqOrtSJMnHNSVdNGGRMMYhDvFdq6lEFRqX-Y1nVpQqh94SrrKlk6hBLcCVXzE3YY2-hfM2hsMTW1MlYRqpHWEBsgN5UrJ84GZTN2uTtz_dhzaeiUg8hK9xLSKCGdJKRFxj6SWPY7iQc7fYDaoQft0P_SjoxdkFA1WSseiW2GpgN8YeK90jN0r6gtZc0zdjraiVZmx8s7tdCDla81dfWKkpxgxt7vl-lJqlyLvt2kPegniQYuY3KkTqNfNl6Ji2-J6Zt4NIh_6M3_OIu37FmRLIAK5E7ZYbfa-HeIqDpzloznN_DmID8 priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lj9MwELZguXBBwILIsiAjITgga9vYSWwuqCBWFRKcFqk3K35BJZqUJJUoR345M47bJSBxjZ3nvCcz3xDyXAaB428cq8G4M2GVYMpazoLlpp75YFUc5_PxU7n8LD6silVKuPWprPKgE6Oidq3FHPkFdlCKAhnuzfY7w6lR-Hc1jdC4SW4hdBmWdFWr64AL_fVDo4wsL3qwbYVkYKUggAaNzcTEGEXM_n8189_Vkn-Yn8u75E7yG-liJPQ9csM398npooGYebOnL2is5Iwp8lPyawnBJf5GWFva_tgDi9CxzWr_mtZ026IYfPMUFB9oCQpeK03oqj3FtCyFCBy9ymaA09YN9Y1rNzh4a7ehY1cjDV37E67qN6bbt3SIzq_v6LFqvX9Ari7fX71bsjRrgVmh8gETbHmYOeekKue1MiYY8ES8VyDxUgaFBf9hXlWFCaHyuSutK2XhwKHgTqiKPyQnTdv4R4TWNp-bShmr0LeR1iAmIDelK2bOBmUz8urwzfV2RNTQMRKRpR4ppIFCOlJIi4y8RbIcdyIadjzQdl90Ei7N61yhlVU4cYdLCOIK63PPvcm98F5m5CUSVaPMwiexdWo9gAdG9Cu9ACUL3FJUPCPnk50ga3a6fGALnWS919ecmZFnx2U8E-vXGt_u4h7QlggGlxE5YafJm01XmvXXiPeNaBqIQnT2_7s_JrfzyNtYAHdOToZu55-AxzSYp1EsfgMLyBik priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a possible choice for patients with resistant thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer treatments |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2865450048 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2860404451 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10472734 https://doaj.org/article/3a29847197204384995ce2e3eb2e4ee8 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3Na9RAFB_6cfEiahWj7TKC6EGiu8kkMyOI7ErLIrRIaWHxMmS-6kI3abNZ6Hr0L_e9SXYx2oOXHDKTkMz7nnnv9wh5LTzD9jc2LsC4x8xIFktj0tibVBdD540M7XxOz_LpJfs6y2Y7ZNPuqFvA5b2hHfaTuqyv39_drj-DwH8KAi_yD0uwWZmIwfpAYAyaOGa7ZB8sE0dBPWXbUwU86m-rjTiPwTLyTRHNve_oGaqA5_-v1v47k_IP03TyiDzsfEo6bpngMdlx5RNyMC4hnl6s6RsasjzD9vkB-TWFwBOPGOaGVndrYB_almCtP9KC3lQoIteOwrqABqHg0dIOeXVJccuWQnSOHmfZwGPzkrrSVgtsyrVa0Lbikfq6-glvdQtdryvaBMfY1XSb0b58Si5Oji--TOOuD0NsmEwa3HxL_NBaK2Q-KqTWXoOX4pwEbSCEl1gM4EecZ9p77hKbG5uLzIKzkVomefqM7JVV6Z4TWphkpLnURqLfI4xGvMBU5zYbWuOlici7zZqrmxZtQ4UoReSqpZACCqlAIcUiMkGybGciUna4UdVXqhM8lRaJRAsssRtPKiDAy4xLXOp04phzIiJvkagKOQyWxBRdWQJ8MCJjqTEoYOCcjKcROezNBDk0_eENW6gNGyus-2UZqsmIvNoO45OY21a6ahXmgCZFoLiIiB479f6sP1LOfwQscETaQISiF__9Gy_JgySwOebJHZK9pl65I3CsGj0gu3zGB2R_cnz27XwQticGQYLgej75_hu52SZN |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEB6V9AAXBBSEocAi8Tggq4m9tneREEqhVUrbCKEi9bbyPlwiETvkIQhH_g__kZm1HTBI3HrNrp3E8_jmW88D4IkoOI2_sWGO4B5yI3kojYnDwsQ677vCSD_O53Scjj7yd-fJ-Rb8bGthKK2y9YneUdvK0Bn5HlVQ8oQU7vXsS0hTo-jtajtCo1aLY7f-ipRt8eroLcr3aRQdHpy9GYXNVIHQcBkt6SgpKvrWWiHTQS61LjRirnMSdVuIQlJqezHIskQXReYimxqbisQidMaWyyzG216BbR4jk-nB9v7B-P2HDcMjgtBW5oh0b4FgmogQYREZO0JEyDvo54cE_AsFf6dn_oF3hzfgehOosmGtWTdhy5W3YGdYIkmfrtkz5lNH_Zn8DvwYIZul9xYTw6pva9RJVtd1rV-ynM0qsrvPjqGnRbfEMExmTTvXBaNzYIaUn8LYcomXTUrmSltNadLXasrqMkpWzKvveFc31fN1xZY-2nZztkmTX9yGs8sQwx3olVXp7gLLTTTQmdRGUjAljKYmhLFObdK3ppAmgBftM1ezuoWH8tRHpKqWkEIJKS8hxQPYJ7FsdlL7bf9BNb9QjTWrOI8kwbqkET-xQNaYGBe52OnIcedEAM9JqIqcBD4Skze1DviDqd2WGqJXR21JsjiA3c5ONG7TXW7VQjXOZaF-m0IAjzfLdCUlzJWuWvk96J6p-1wAoqNOnX_WXSknn3yDcWrfQW2P7v3_2x_B1dHZ6Yk6ORof34drkddzyr7bhd5yvnIPMFxb6oeNkTBQl2yWvwDZwVXl |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hyperbaric+oxygen+therapy%3A+a+possible+choice+for+patients+with+resistant+thin+endometrium+during+frozen+embryo+transfer+treatments&rft.jtitle=Reproductive+biology+and+endocrinology&rft.au=Chen%2C+Jingjing&rft.au=Huang%2C+Fangling&rft.au=Fu%2C+Jing&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Jianjuan&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1477-7827&rft.eissn=1477-7827&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12958-023-01123-4&rft.externalDocID=A763020573 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon |