Src Family Kinases Are Involved in the Differential Signaling from Two Splice Forms of c-Kit
In both mice and humans alternate splicing results in isoforms of c-Kit characterized by the presence or the absence of a tetrapeptide sequence, GNNK, in the juxtamembrane region of the extracellular domain. Dramatic differences in the kinetics and magnitude of activation of the intrinsic tyrosine k...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 278; no. 11; pp. 9159 - 9166 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
14.03.2003
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In both mice and humans alternate splicing results in isoforms of c-Kit characterized by the presence or the absence of a
tetrapeptide sequence, GNNK, in the juxtamembrane region of the extracellular domain. Dramatic differences in the kinetics
and magnitude of activation of the intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity of c-Kit between the GNNKâ and GNNK+ isoforms has previously
been shown. Here we report the analysis of downstream targets of receptor signaling, which revealed that the signaling was
differentially regulated in the two splice forms. The kinetics of phosphorylation of Shc, previously demonstrated to be phosphorylated
by Src downstream of c-Kit, was stronger and more rapid in the GNNKâ form, whereas it showed slower kinetics in the GNNK+
form. Inhibition of Src family kinases with the specific Src family kinase inhibitor SU6656 altered the kinetics of activation
of the GNNKâ form of c-Kit so that it resembled that of the GNNK+ form. In cells expressing the GNNKâ form, SCF was rapidly
degraded, whereas in cells expressing the GNNK+ form only showed a very slow rate of degradation of SCF. In the GNNK+ form
the Src inhibitor SU6656 only had a weak effect on degradation, whereas in the GNNKâ form it dramatically inhibited degradation.
In summary, the two splice forms show, despite only a four-amino acid sequence difference, remarkable differences in their
signaling capabilities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0021-9258 1083-351X 1083-351X |
DOI: | 10.1074/jbc.M211726200 |