Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates

• Published in: European journal of epidemiology Vol. 33; no. 10; pp. 947 - 952
• Main Authors: Burgess, Stephen, Labrecque, Jeremy A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer 01.10.2018; Springer Netherlands; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Blood Pressure; Cardiology; Epidemiology; Exposure; Genetic diversity; Genetic variance; Genetic Variation; Humans; Hypertension; Infectious Diseases; Likelihood Functions; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mendelian Randomization Analysis - methods; METHODS; Models, Genetic; Models, Statistical; Oncology; Public Health; Random Allocation; Randomization; Risk Factors; Subgroups; Causal inference; Instrumental variable; Effect estimation; Mendelian randomization; Genetic epidemiology
• ISSN: 0393-2990; 1573-7284; 1573-7284
• DOI: 10.1007/s10654-018-0424-6

Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants to make causal inferences about a modifiable exposure. Subject to a genetic variant satisfying the instrumental variable assumptions, an association between the variant and outcome implies a causal effect of the exposure on the outcome. Complications arise with a binary exposure that is a dichotomization of a continuous risk factor (for example, hypertension is a dichotomization of blood pressure). This can lead to violation of the exclusion restriction assumption: the genetic variant can influence the outcome via the continuous risk factor even if the binary exposure does not change. Provided the instrumental variable assumptions are satisfied for the underlying continuous risk factor, causal inferences for the binary exposure are valid for the continuous risk factor. Causal estimates for the binary exposure assume the causal effect is a stepwise function at the point of dichotomization. Even then, estimation requires further parametric assumptions. Under monotonicity, the causal estimate represents the average causal effect in 'cornpliers', individuals for whom the binary exposure would be present if they have the genetic variant and absent otherwise. Unlike in randomized trials, genetic compliers are unlikely to be a large or representative subgroup of the population. Under homogeneity, the causal effect of the exposure on the outcome is assumed constant in all individuals; rarely a plausible assumption. We here provide methods for causal estimation with a binary exposure (although subject to all the above caveats). Mendelian randomization investigations with a dichotomized binary exposure should be conceptualized in terms of an underlying continuous variable.